Skip to main content
NCBI home page
G3: Genes | Genomes | Genetics logoLink to G3: Genes | Genomes | Genetics
. 2012 Dec 1;2(12):1577–1584. doi: 10.1534/g3.112.002253

Mapping Six New Susceptibility to Colon Cancer (Scc) Loci Using a Mouse Interspecific Backcross

Chevonne D Eversley *, Xie Yuying *, R Scott Pearsall *, David W Threadgill *,†,1
PMCID: PMC3516479  PMID: 23275880

Abstract

Colorectal cancer (CRC) has a complex etiology resulting from the combination of multiple genetic and environmental factors, each with small effects. Interactions among susceptibility modifier loci make many of the loci difficult to detect in human genome-wide association studies. Previous analyses in mice have used classical inbred strains, which share large portions of their genomes due to common ancestry. Herein, we used an interspecific backcross between the Mus musculus strain A/J and the Mus spretus strain SPRET/EiJ to map 6 additional CRC modifier loci (Scc16-21) and 2 suggestive loci. Three loci modify the location of tumors along the proximal-distal axis of the colon. Six CRC modifiers previously mapped in intraspecific crosses were also replicated. This work confirms genetic models suggesting that CRC is caused by many small effect alleles and brings the catalog of reported CRC modifier loci to 23 spread across 13 chromosomes. Furthermore, this work provides the foundation for large population-level epistatic interaction tests to identify combinations of low effect alleles that may have large effects on CRC susceptibility.

Keywords: spretus, cancer modifier, colorectal cancer

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most commonly diagnosed form of cancer in developed countries, and it is responsible for the second largest number of cancer-related deaths. First-degree family members of an individual with sporadic cancer have a 2- to 3-fold increased risk of developing CRC (Bishop and Thomas 1990; Stephenson et al. 1991), indicating that shared genetic factors likely contribute to differential susceptibility. Twin studies demonstrate that heritable factors account for as much as 35% of sporadic CRC cases (Lichtenstein et al. 2000).

Genetic analyses in both humans and mice suggest that multiple small-effect alleles contribute to sporadic CRC susceptibility. Recent genome-wide association studies in humans have identified loci that increase risk associated with CRC (Broderick et al. 2007; Houlston et al. 2008; Jaeger et al. 2008; Tomlinson et al. 2007, 2008; Zanke et al. 2007). In an independent study, three of the loci were replicated, and combined analysis suggested that the odds ratio is at most 2.6 for a high-risk patient with two risk alleles among the three loci (Tenesa et al. 2008). Similar to the variability in susceptibility of humans to sporadic CRC, different mouse strains show varying susceptibility to colonic tumors (Bissahoyo et al. 2005; Diwan and Blackman 1980).

The CRC susceptibility loci identified in mice have primarily been based upon the azoxymethane (AOM) or related dimethylhydrozine (DMH) carcinogen model (Schauer et al. 1969; Uronis and Threadgill 2009; Ward 1975). AOM induces tumors in the distal mouse colon that resemble sporadic CRC of the descending colon in humans both histologically (Chang 1978; Uronis et al. 2007) and molecularly (Hirose et al. 2003; Kaiser et al. 2007; Takahashi et al. 2000; Vivona et al. 1993). Susceptibility to colon cancer 1 (Scc1) was one of the first low-penetrance cancer modifiers to be successfully mapped and cloned in mice using the AOM/DMH model (Ruivenkamp et al. 2002). An additional 14 Scc loci have been mapped using the same recombinant congenic panel between BALB/cHeA and STS/A strains (Moen et al. 1992, 1996; Ruivenkamp et al. 2003; van Wezel et al. 1999), and more recently, one unnamed locus using genome-wide association in a panel of inbred mouse strains (Liu et al. 2012). Two additional colon carcinogenesis susceptibility loci, Ccs1 and Ccs2, were reported in studies using crosses between ICR/Ha and C57BL/6Ha and between CBA/J and C57BL/6J, respectively (Angel et al. 2000; Jacoby et al. 1994).

A recent analysis of inbred mouse strains revealed that common laboratory strains have a significant, shared contribution from Mus musculus domesticus (Roberts et al. 2007; Yang et al. 2011). The consequence of common ancestry is that large genomic intervals are identical by descent, resulting in reduced genetic diversity. Consequently, previous studies in mice have analyzed only part of the mouse genome for CRC susceptibility loci. SPRET/EiJ (M. spretus) diverged from M. musculus over one million years ago and offers the potential to analyze additional regions of the mouse genome. Using genetic crosses between the AOM-resistant SPRET/EiJ strain and the susceptible A/J strain, we mapped six additional Scc loci and two suggestive loci influencing a variety of tumor phenotypes, including position along the proximal-distal axis of the colon.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Genetic crosses

A/J (A) and SPRET/EiJ (S) mice were obtained from the Jackson Laboratory (Bar Harbor, ME). Female A/J mice (M. musculus) were crossed to male SPRET/EiJ mice (M. spretus) to generate ASF1 hybrids. Since this interspecific cross generates infertile males, ASF1 females were backcrossed to A/J males to create a population of 235 (ASF1)A N2 mice.

Cancer phenotyping

Mice, two-to-four months of age, were given four weekly intraperitoneal injections of AOM at 10 mg/kg of body weight (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO) as previously determined to optimize differential susceptibility to AOM-induced CRC (Bissahoyo et al. 2005). Mice were weighed and killed by CO2 asphyxiation 20 weeks after the last AOM dose. A tail clip, liver lobe, and the entire colon were removed from each mouse. Colons were gently flushed with phosphate buffer saline, mounted on bibulous paper, and splayed open along the longitudinal axis. The number of tumors, their sizes, and locations along the proximal-distal axis were recorded.

Genotyping

DNA was extracted from liver or tail samples from each mouse using Puregene DNA Purification Kit (Promega, Madison, WI). Mice from the (ASF1)A N2 generation were genotyped using a custom Sequenom MassARRAY SNP Genotyping platform containing 183 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP) markers (GeneSeek, Lincoln, NE). The custom platform design included SNP markers from NCBI Build 37 spaced at 10–15 cM intervals selected to be informative between the A/J and SPRET/EiJ mouse strains. All genotype and phenotype data are provided in Supporting Information, File S1.

QTL mapping

Genotype probabilities were calculated using the Haldane map algorithm in J/qtl software (http://research.jax.org/faculty/churchill/software/Jqtl/index.html), a Java interface for R/qtl (Broman et al. 2003). As none of the tumor phenotypes could be transformed to fit a Gaussian distribution when all mice were included, the binary phenotype of presence or absence of tumors was used for the initial analysis. Binary analysis was performed by obtaining the maximum-likelihood estimates using the EM algorithm at 2 cM intervals throughout the genome (Broman 2003). Mice without tumors were excluded from further quantitative analyses. Genetic analysis of body weight was performed on nontransformed data using all mice.

The phenotypic measurements tumor number, average tumor diameter, maximum tumor diameter, and tumor position along the proximal-distal colonic axis from mice with tumors (n = 113) were transformed using rank z-transformation parameters and analyzed as normally distributed phenotypes. One-dimensional genomes scans were performed using the EM algorithm. Tumor load (tumor number × average tumor diameter) could not be transformed to fit a normal distribution and was analyzed using an extension of the Wilcoxon rank sum test for non-parametric interval mapping (Broman 2003; Kruglyak and Lander 1995). No secondary loci were detected in any of the one-dimensional genome scans when controlling for the primary locus that was detected in each analysis. Only loci that reached genome-wide significance were given official designations.

Two-dimensional analysis of tumor phenotypes was performed using Haley-Knott regression algorithms to identify epistatic interactions. Significance thresholds were calculated by performing 1000 permutations with intervals set at the 182 SNP markers used in the analysis. The additive and interaction models were used to determine the type of epistasis influencing phenotypic variance.

Pointwise Wilcoxon rank sum test was performed on SNP markers in close proximity to previously identified Scc loci (Moen et al. 1992, 1996; Ruivenkamp et al. 2003; van Wezel et al. 1999).

RESULTS

Validation of the A/J × SPRET/EiJ cross for modifier mapping

To validate the utility of the interspecific backcross population for mapping modifiers of CRC susceptibility, modifier loci controlling body weights of (ASF1)A N2 mice were analyzed, and their locations were compared with previously identified obesity modifiers in SPRET/EiJ crosses. Loci on Chr 7 (Mob1) and Chr12 (Mob3), originally reported in a (C57BL/6J × SPRET/EiJ) × C57BL/6J backcross (Fisler et al. 1993; Warden et al. 1995; Yi et al. 2004), were replicated (Figure 1). Additionally, two previously reported body weight modifiers on the X chromosome (Bw1 and Bw3) were replicated. Bw1 and Bw3 were previously reported in (A/J × SPRET/EiJ) × C57BL/6J and (C3H/He × SPRET/EiJ) × C57BL/6J crosses, respectively (Dragani et al. 1995).

Figure 1 .

Figure 1 

Open in a new tab

Genome scan for modifier loci controlling body weight. Significance thresholds are shown by dotted lines, and red lines mark peak LOD scores.

Replication of previously mapped Scc loci

When exposed to four weekly doses of AOM, 100% of A/J mice developed colonic tumors, whereas SPRET/EiJ mice were completely resistant (Figure 2). Genome-wide, SPRET/EiJ is dominant to the susceptible A/J strain, as less than 5% of ASF1 hybrids develop tumors. Almost 50% of the (ASF1)A N2 backcross mice (113 of 235) developed colorectal tumors in response to AOM exposure.

Figure 2 .

Figure 2 

Open in a new tab

Colon tumor penetrance of parental strains, F1 hybrids, and N2 backcross mice used in the current study.

To determine whether previously mapped colon tumor susceptibility loci also contribute to differential susceptibility in the (ASF1)A N2 population, point-wise analysis was performed using the SNP marker nearest to previously identified Scc and Ccs loci (Table 1) (Angel et al. 2000; Jacoby et al. 1994; Moen et al. 1992, 1996; Ruivenkamp et al. 2003; van Wezel et al. 1996, 1999). Markers near Scc9, Scc11, Scc13, and Scc15 showed significant association with tumor presence, whereas Scc5 and Scc13 were associated with tumor number and tumor load. Scc8 was only associated with tumor load. No other Scc or Ccs loci showed an association with colon tumor phenotypes in the (ASF1)A N2 population, and none of the previously mapped loci reached significance when performing a genome-wide analysis, consistent with being low-effect susceptibility alleles. Since SNPs were not selected based on location of previous colon cancer susceptibility loci, some markers were more distant, resulting in reduced power to replicate previous results.

Table 1. Point-wise analysis of previously mapped colon cancer susceptibility loci.

Locus SNP Marker Chr Mb Presence/Absence P-value Tumor Multiplicity P-value Tumor Load P-value
Scc1 rs3716390 2 81.6 0.55 0.81 0.41
Scc2 rs4223152 2 52.5 0.64 0.45 0.72
Scc3 rs8253293 1 196.9 0.28 0.37 0.13
Scc4 rs4231637 17 73.5 0.13 0.93 0.78
Scc5 UNC_18_37970902 18 37.9 0.66 0.02 0.02
Scc6 rs4228590 11 17.1 0.74 0.11 0.15
Scc7 / Ccs2 rs6322812 3 159.5 0.08 0.45 0.73
Scc8 rs3701395 8 3.1 0.25 0.09 0.02
Scc9 rs13480754 10 106.9 0.05 0.47 0.70
Scc10 rs16822005 2 91 0.42 0.85 0.41
Scc11 rs3024208 4 130.4 0.03 0.09 0.25
Scc12 rs16807506 7 135 0.53 0.69 0.85
Scc13 rs29973570 6 72.5 0.03 0.03 0.02
Scc14 rs6280091 10 31.4 0.54 0.66 0.87
Scc15 rs4228762 11 58 <0.01 0.11 0.18
Ccs1 rs8261201 12 88.5 0.24 0.12 0.35
Open in a new tab

P-values lower than 0.05 are marked in bold.

SPRET/EiJ harbors a major colon cancer resistance locus

Binary analysis of tumor presence (≥1 tumor, n = 113 mice) and absence (0 tumors, n = 125 mice) detected a single modifier locus (LOD = 3.83; Figure 3). This locus, designated Scc16 (Table 2), was most strongly associated with rs16808928 (Chr 11, 71 cM). A tumor effect plot revealed that SPRET/EiJ contributes a tumor-resistance allele at Scc16 (Figure 3, inset); mice heterozygous at rs16808928 have a significantly increased likelihood of being tumor free than mice homozygous for the A/J allele (t test, P < 0.0001).

Figure 3 .

Figure 3 

Open in a new tab

Genome scan for modifier loci controlling the binary tumor presence phenotype. Significance thresholds are shown by dotted lines, and red line marks peak LOD score. Inset shows allele effect plot of the peak marker on Chr 11.

Table 2. Summary of colon cancer modifier loci identified in an (ASF1)A N2 backcross.

Locus Phenotype SNP Marker Chr Mba Conf Int (cM)b LOD Score P-value
Scc16 Tumor presence rs16808928 11 116.4 32.0–71.0 3.83 <0.01
Scc17 Tumor number rs13479769 8 55.6 12.0–70.8 2.66 0.04
Chr 1 Tumor number rs3658044 1 19.2 0–20.0 2.291 0.11
Scc18 Tumor load rs16805672 6 88.7 36.2–58.7 2.825 0.04
Scc19 Max tumor size × sex/tumor load rs13482118 14 30.6 5.8–20.2 3.389 0.05
Scc20 Rel distal position × tumor number rs8238935 1 58.1 9.1–34.5 4.067 <0.01
Full / Additive Alpha
Scc17 × Scc21 Tumor load rs13479769 × rs16810780 8 × 1 55.6 × 34.5 5.565 / 4.581 0.10
Scc18 × Scc19 Tumor load × sex rs16805672 × rs13482118 6 × 14 88.7 × 30.6 6.236 / 6.190 0.05
Full / Interaction Alpha
Chr 1 × Chr 10 Rel distal position × tumor number rs3658044 × NCBI_10_99187828 1 × 10 19.2 × 99.1 7.358 / 6.351 0.10
Open in a new tab
a

Physical location of SNP markers.

b

1.5 LOD confidence intervals based on genetic analysis.

Colorectal cancer phenotypes are determined by oligogenic modifier loci

Mice without tumors were excluded from analysis of quantitative tumor phenotypes, including tumor number, tumor load, average tumor diameter, maximum tumor diameter, and tumor position along the colon, phenotypes that are weakly correlated within the (ASF1)A N2 backcross population (Table 3). Only average tumor diameter and maximum tumor diameter, as well as tumor number and tumor load have r2 values greater than 0.7. The fact that average tumor size was not correlated with tumor load, which is the product of average tumor size and tumor number, suggests that tumor number is much more variable than average tumor diameter and is the major determinant of tumor load.

Table 3. Tumor phenotype correlation matrix.

r2 Tumor Load Max Tumor Diameter Avg Tumor Diameter Relative Position Tumor Number
Tumor load 1.00 0.68 0.50 0.47 0.89
Max tumor diameter 1.00 0.86 0.31 0.47
Avg tumor diameter 1.00 0.17 0.23
Relative position 1.00 0.45
Tumor number 1.00
Open in a new tab

Tumor number is the only phenotype that was not transformable into a normal distribution. Non-parametric methods detected a single modifier on Chr 8 named Scc17 (rs13479769, 30 cM; LOD = 2.66; Table 2), which explains 10.1% of the variance in tumor number (P = 0.001). An effect plot revealed that mice heterozygous at the Scc17 locus have fewer tumors than mice homozygous for the A/J allele (t test, P = 0.0003), showing that the A/J allele increases tumor number. An additional putative tumor number modifier on Chr 1 (rs3658044) was suggestive; this locus potentially explains 7.6% of the phenotypic variance (P = 0.003).

Analysis of tumor load also identified one modifier on Chr 6 named Scc18 (rs16805672, 37 cM; LOD = 2.826; Table 2), which explains 11.4% of the variance (P < 0.0001). Interestingly, the SPRET/EiJ Scc18 allele increases tumor load. No loci were detected that modified average or maximum tumor diameter. However, a sex-dependent modifier locus on Chr 14 named Scc19 was detected for maximum tumor size (LOD = 3.421); Scc19 explains less than 1% of the variance (P = 0.325).

The colon has a proximal-distal axis with regional differences in cell composition and function. Modifiers influencing tumor position within the colon have not been reported. To identify whether modifiers influence tumor position, a genome scan was performed using measurements of tumor position along the proximal-distal axis of the colon. Although no significant associations were detected using tumor position alone, if tumor number were considered as a covariate, one modifier named Scc20 was identified on Chr 1 (rs8238935, 32 cM; LOD = 4.067; Figure 4). This locus is proximal to the suggestive tumor number modifier Chr 1 (rs3658044) with an overlapping confidence interval; however, it is likely to be a distinct locus because the r2 correlation between tumor number and position is only 0.45 (Table 3). Mice homozygous for the A/J Scc20 allele are likely to have tumors that are positioned more distally than mice heterozygous at the Scc20 locus.

Figure 4 .

Figure 4 

Open in a new tab

Genome scan for modifier loci controlling the tumor number phenotype. Significance thresholds are shown by dotted lines, and red line marks peak LOD score.

Epistatic interactions among modifiers

Two-dimensional modifier scans were performed on all tumor phenotypes to detect allele combinations that may have gone undetected using one-dimensional scans. Analysis of tumor load revealed one significant (α = 0.05) and one suggestive interaction (α = 0.1; Figure 5 and Table 2). The suggestive additive interaction was detected between Chr 8 (Scc17) and a locus on Chr 1 named Scc21 (full LOD = 5.565, and additive LOD = 4.581). An effect plot of tumor load shows that the tumor load–increasing effect of the A/J allele at Scc21 is observed only when mice are also homozygous for the A/J allele at Scc17 (Figure 5, inset). A larger study will be required to validate putative epistatic interactions between loci on Chrs 1 and 6, Chrs 6 and 8, and Chrs 6 and 18 that do not reach the suggestive threshold set for interactions (Figure 5), as well as for the detection of interactions previously reported such as between Ssc7 and Scc8 (van Wezel et al. 1996).

Figure 5 .

Figure 5 

Open in a new tab

Heat plot of two-dimensional genome scan for tumor load modifiers. Color scale represents significance levels. The image above the diagonal is the additive portion of allele effect and below the diagonal is the full allele effect. Inset shows effect plot of the interaction detected between Chr 8 and 1 (Scc17 × Scc21).

When sex was used as a covariate with tumor load, a significant interaction was detected between Scc18 and Scc19 (full LOD = 6.236, and additive LOD = 6.190, Table 2).

A suggestive interaction was also detected for tumor position, but only if tumor number was used as a covariate (Table 2). The interaction LOD between (rs3658044) and a locus on Chr 10 (NCBI_10_99187828) is 7.358 (full–add).

DISCUSSION

Several loci influencing CRC susceptibility have been identified in crosses between resistant and susceptible mouse strains. Numerous studies using recombinant congenic strains led to the identification of 15 Scc loci, with almost half being involved in two-way interactions (Moen et al. 1992, 1996; Ruivenkamp et al. 2003; van Wezel et al. 1996, 1999). Analyses of additional crosses were used to identify Ccs1 and Ccs2 (Angel et al. 2000; Jacoby et al. 1994). We employed an interspecific backcross to replicate six of the previously reported loci and to identify six additional loci, Scc16–21 (Figure 6). This brings the number of reported colon cancer susceptibility loci in mice to 23 spread across 13 chromosomes, with half of the known loci being detected in the interspecific backcross reported here. Similar to previous observations, numerous interactions between modifiers were observed, suggesting that networks of interacting, low-penetrance alleles determine CRC susceptibility. The small effect of most modifiers highlights the difficulties involved in identifying allelic combinations that influence cancer susceptibility in humans and that likely contributed to several previous modifier loci not replicating in the current study. Lack of replication could also be due to genetic differences among the strain combinations used and/or Type I errors.

Figure 6 .

Figure 6 

Open in a new tab

Comparative locations of all reported colon cancer susceptibility loci. Each locus is centered in its confidence interval.

A recently reported genome-wide association study using an intrasubspecific panel of mouse strains also replicated some previously detected Scc and Ccs loci (Liu et al. 2012), although only one, Scc8, was in common with the present study. The lack of concordance across the three approaches (intrasubspecific linkage, intrasubspecific association, and intersubspecific linkage) underscores the difficulties in detecting low-penetrance allele effects and the variation in loci detected that is dependent upon the genetic structure of the target populations.

Genome-wide analysis of an interspecific backcross between SPRET/EiJ and A/J reported here detected a locus (Scc16) with a major effect controlling penetrance of AOM-induced tumors. Tumor load was most strongly influenced by Scc18 located on Chr 6. Furthermore, Scc17, modulating tumor number, and Scc21 were found to interact to affect tumor load. Tumor load is also regulated in a sex-dependent fashion by Scc19, which was detected individually using maximum tumor diameter.

Modifiers also appear to influence the relative position of tumors along the proximal-distal axis of the colon. Scc20 on Chr 1 and an interaction between suggestive loci on Chr 1 (rs3658044) and Chr 10 (NCBI_10_99187828) modify spatial positioning of tumors. Chr 10 (NCBI_10_99187828) is proximal to Scc9 with both loci being located in a region of conserved synteny with human Chr 12. Interestingly, several studies report hypermethylation, overexpression, and chromosomal loss of genes associated with colon cancer on 12q (Nakao et al. 1998; Richter et al. 2003; van Dieren et al. 2006). The detection of Chr 10 (NCBI_10_99187828) in the present study increases the possibility that one or both of these loci represent alleles whose orthologs may be associated with cancer susceptibility in humans.

A number of genome-wide association studies have been conducted recently in humans, which revealed several common variants that function as low-penetrance susceptibility alleles. Although none of the mouse susceptibility loci identified here appear to be in conserved syntenic segments with those detected in the human studies, the mouse loci may function in similar pathways or may be detectable only when allele interactions are tested. Future identification of the underlying genes responsible for the Scc loci should reveal the relationship between mouse and human cancer susceptibility and how genetic modifiers influence susceptibility.

Supplementary Material

Supporting Information
supp_2_12_1577__index.html (780B, html)

Acknowledgments

The authors thank members of the Threadgill Lab for assistance with mouse necropsies. This work was supported by National Institutes of Health grants CA-092479, CA079869, CA105417, and CA106991; fellowship CA123636; and center grants DK034987 and CA016086.

Footnotes

Communicating editor: J. B. Holland

Literature Cited

  1. Angel J. M., Popova N., Lanko N., Turusov V. S., DiGiovanni J., 2000.  A locus that influences susceptibility to 1, 2-dimethylhydrazine-induced colon tumors maps to the distal end of mouse chromosome 3. Mol. Carcinog. 27: 47–54 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bishop D. T., Thomas H. J., 1990.  The genetics of colorectal cancer. Cancer Surv. 9: 585–604 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bissahoyo A., Pearsall R. S., Hanlon K., Amann V., Hicks D., et al. , 2005.  Azoxymethane is a genetic background-dependent colorectal tumor initiator and promoter in mice: effects of dose, route, and diet. Toxicol. Sci. 88: 340–345 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Broderick P., Carvajal-Carmona L., Pittman A. M., Webb E., Howarth K., et al. , 2007.  A genome-wide association study shows that common alleles of SMAD7 influence colorectal cancer risk. Nat. Genet. 39: 1315–1317 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Broman K. W., 2003.  Mapping quantitative trait loci in the case of a spike in the phenotype distribution. Genetics 163: 1169–1175 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Broman K. W., Wu H., Sen S., Churchill G. A., 2003.  R/qtl: QTL mapping in experimental crosses. Bioinformatics 19: 889–890 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Chang W. W., 1978.  Histogenesis of symmetrical 1,2-dimethylhydrazine-induced neoplasms of the colon in the mouse. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 60: 1405–1418 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Diwan B. A., Blackman K. E., 1980.  Differential susceptibility of 3 sublines of C57BL/6 mice to the induction of colorectal tumors by 1,2-dimethylhydrazine. Cancer Lett. 9: 111–115 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Dragani T. A., Zeng Z. B., Canzian F., Gariboldi M., Ghilarducci M. T., et al. , 1995.  Mapping of body weight loci on mouse chromosome X. Mamm. Genome 6: 778–781 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Fisler J. S., Warden C. H., Pace M. J., Lusis A. J., 1993.  BSB: a new mouse model of multigenic obesity. Obes. Res. 1: 271–280 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Hirose Y., Kuno T., Yamada Y., Sakata K., Katayama M., et al. , 2003.  Azoxymethane-induced beta-catenin-accumulated crypts in colonic mucosa of rodents as an intermediate biomarker for colon carcinogenesis. Carcinogenesis 24: 107–111 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Houlston R. S., Webb E., Broderick P., Pittman A. M., di Bernardo M. C., et al. , 2008.  Meta-analysis of genome-wide association data identifies four new susceptibility loci for colorectal cancer. Nat. Genet. 40: 1426–1435 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Jacoby R. F., Hohman C., Marshall D. J., Frick T. J., Schlack S., et al. , 1994.  Genetic analysis of colon cancer susceptibility in mice. Genomics 22: 381–387 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Jaeger E., Webb E., Howarth K., Carvajal-Carmona L., Rowan A., et al. , 2008.  Common genetic variants at the CRAC1 (HMPS) locus on chromosome 15q13.3 influence colorectal cancer risk. Nat. Genet. 40: 26–28 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Kaiser S., Park Y. K., Franklin J. L., Halberg R. B., Yu M., et al. , 2007.  Transcriptional recapitulation and subversion of embryonic colon development by mouse colon tumor models and human colon cancer. Genome Biol. 8: R131. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Kruglyak L., Lander E. S., 1995.  A nonparametric approach for mapping quantitative trait loci. Genetics 139: 1421–1428 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Lichtenstein P., Holm N. V., Verkasalo P. K., Iliadou A., Kaprio J., et al. , 2000.  Environmental and heritable factors in the causation of cancer--analyses of cohorts of twins from Sweden, Denmark, and Finland. N. Engl. J. Med. 343: 78–85 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Liu P., Lu Y., Liu H., Wen W., Jia D., et al. , 2012.  Genome-wide association and fine mapping of genetic Loci predisposing to colon carcinogenesis in mice. Mol. Cancer Res. 10: 66–74 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Moen C. J., Snoek M., Hart A. A., Demant P., 1992.  Scc-1, a novel colon cancer susceptibility gene in the mouse: linkage to CD44 (Ly-24, Pgp-1) on chromosome 2. Oncogene 7: 563–566 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Moen C. J., Groot P. C., Hart A. A., Snoek M., Demant P., 1996.  Fine mapping of colon tumor susceptibility (Scc) genes in the mouse, different from the genes known to be somatically mutated in colon cancer. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 93: 1082–1086 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Nakao K., Shibusawa M., Tsunoda A., Yoshizawa H., Murakami M., et al. , 1998.  Genetic changes in primary colorectal cancer by comparative genomic hybridization. Surg. Today 28: 567–569 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Richter H., Slezak P., Walch A., Werner M., Braselmann H., et al. , 2003.  Distinct chromosomal imbalances in nonpolypoid and polypoid colorectal adenomas indicate different genetic pathways in the development of colorectal neoplasms. Am. J. Pathol. 163: 287–294 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Roberts A., Pardo-Manuel de Villena F., Wang W., McMillan L., Threadgill D. W., 2007.  The polymorphism architecture of mouse genetic resources elucidated using genome-wide resequencing data: implications for QTL discovery and systems genetics. Mamm. Genome 18: 473–481 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Ruivenkamp C. A., van Wezel T., Zanon C., Stassen A. P., Vlcek C., et al. , 2002.  Ptprj is a candidate for the mouse colon-cancer susceptibility locus Scc1 and is frequently deleted in human cancers. Nat. Genet. 31: 295–300 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Ruivenkamp C. A., Csikos T., Klous A. M., van Wezel T., Demant P., 2003.  Five new mouse susceptibility to colon cancer loci, Scc11-Scc15. Oncogene 22: 7258–7260 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Schauer A., Vollnagel T., Wildanger F., 1969.  Cancerization of the rat intestine by 1,2-dimethylhydrazine. Z. Gesamte Exp. Med. 150: 87–93 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Stephenson B. M., Finan P. J., Gascoyne J., Garbett F., Murday V. A., et al. , 1991.  Frequency of familial colorectal cancer. Br. J. Surg. 78: 1162–1166 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Takahashi M., Nakatsugi S., Sugimura T., Wakabayashi K., 2000.  Frequent mutations of the beta-catenin gene in mouse colon tumors induced by azoxymethane. Carcinogenesis 21: 1117–1120 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Tenesa A., Farrington S. M., Prendergast J. G., Porteous M. E., Walker M., et al. , 2008.  Genome-wide association scan identifies a colorectal cancer susceptibility locus on 11q23 and replicates risk loci at 8q24 and 18q21. Nat. Genet. 40: 631–637 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Tomlinson I., Webb E., Carvajal-Carmona L., Broderick P., Kemp Z., et al. , 2007.  A genome-wide association scan of tag SNPs identifies a susceptibility variant for colorectal cancer at 8q24.21. Nat. Genet. 39: 984–988 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Tomlinson I. P., Webb E., Carvajal-Carmona L., Broderick P., Howarth K., et al. , 2008.  A genome-wide association study identifies colorectal cancer susceptibility loci on chromosomes 10p14 and 8q23.3. Nat. Genet. 40: 623–630 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Uronis J. M., Threadgill D. W., 2009.  Murine models of colorectal cancer. Mamm. Genome 20: 261–268 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Uronis J. M., Herfarth H. H., Rubinas T. C., Bissahoyo A. C., Hanlon K., et al. , 2007.  Flat colorectal cancers are genetically determined and progress to invasion without going through a polypoid stage. Cancer Res. 67: 11594–11600 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. van Dieren J. M., Wink J. C., Vissers K. J., van Marion R., Hoogmans M. M., et al. , 2006.  Chromosomal and microsatellite instability of adenocarcinomas and dysplastic lesions (DALM) in ulcerative colitis. Diagn. Mol. Pathol. 15: 216–222 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. van Wezel T., Stassen A. P., Moen C. J., Hart A. A., van der Valk M. A., et al. , 1996.  Gene interaction and single gene effects in colon tumour susceptibility in mice. Nat. Genet. 14: 468–470 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. van Wezel T., Ruivenkamp C. A., Stassen A. P., Moen C. J., Demant P., 1999.  Four new colon cancer susceptibility loci, Scc6 to Scc9 in the mouse. Cancer Res. 59: 4216–4218 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Vivona A. A., Shpitz B., Medline A., Bruce W. R., Hay K., et al. , 1993.  K-ras mutations in aberrant crypt foci, adenomas and adenocarcinomas during azoxymethane-induced colon carcinogenesis. Carcinogenesis 14: 1777–1781 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Ward J. M., 1975.  Dose response to a single injection of azoxymethane in rats. Induction of tumors in the gastrointestinal tract, auditory sebaceous glands, kidney, liver and preputial gland. Vet. Pathol. 12: 165–177 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Warden C. H., Fisler J. S., Shoemaker S. M., Wen P. Z., Svenson K. L., et al. , 1995.  Identification of four chromosomal loci determining obesity in a multifactorial mouse model. J. Clin. Invest. 95: 1545–1552 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Yang H., Wang J. R., Didion J. P., Buus R. J., Bell T. A., et al. , 2011.  Subspecific origin and haplotype diversity in the laboratory mouse. Nat. Genet. 43: 648–655 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Yi N., Diament A., Chiu S., Kim K., Allison D. B., et al. , 2004.  Characterization of epistasis influencing complex spontaneous obesity in the BSB model. Genetics 167: 399–409 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Zanke B. W., Greenwood C. M., Rangrej J., Kustra R., Tenesa A., et al. , 2007.  Genome-wide association scan identifies a colorectal cancer susceptibility locus on chromosome 8q24. Nat. Genet. 39: 989–994 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supporting Information
supp_2_12_1577__index.html (780B, html)
supp_2.12.1577_FileS1.xlsx (180KB, xlsx)

Articles from G3: Genes|Genomes|Genetics are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES