Skip to main content
Indian Journal of Microbiology logoLink to Indian Journal of Microbiology
. 2012 Oct 9;52(4):676–681. doi: 10.1007/s12088-012-0313-8

Antimicrobial and Antimycobacterial Activities of Methyl Caffeate Isolated from Solanum torvum Swartz. Fruit

Chandrasekhar Balachandran 1, Veeramuthu Duraipandiyan 1,2, Naif Abdullah Al-Dhabi 2, K Balakrishna 1, Nitin Pal Kalia 3, Vikrant Singh Rajput 3, Inshad Ali Khan 3, Savarimuthu Ignacimuthu 1,
PMCID: PMC3516656  PMID: 24293730

Abstract

Abstract

Solanum torvum Swartz. (Solanaceae) fruit is traditionally used for the treatment of bacterial and fungal infections. The methanolic extract was subjected to activity guided fractionation by column chromatography over silica gel. The structure of the compound was elucidated using physical and spectroscopic data. The antimicrobial activity was screened using five Gram-positive bacteria, six Gram-negative bacteria, seven clinical isolates and four fungi. Antimycobacterial activity was screened against two Mycobacterium strains. The zone of inhibition by methyl caffeate ranged from 0 to 22 mm. The lowest minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) values of methyl caffeate were: 50 μg/ml against P. vulgaris, 25 μg/ml against K. pneumoniae (ESBL-3971), 8 μg/ml against M. tuberculosis (H37Rv) and 8 μg/ml against M. tuberculosis (RifR). Methyl caffeate showed moderate antimicrobial and prominent antimycobacterial activities. Methyl caffeate can be evaluated further for drug development.

Keywords: Methyl caffeate, Solanum torvum, Antimicrobial, Antimycobacterial

Introduction

In recent years there has been an increasing interest in the use of natural substances against infectious diseases [1]. The development of antibiotic resistance and undesirable side effects due to excessive use of synthetic drugs has necessitated the search for new plant products to treat bacterial and fungal infections [2]. Herbs contain copious amount of chemicals that could be exploited to prevent microbial infections [3]. The emergence of antibiotic-resistant mycobacterial strains underscores the need for novel effective drugs against resistant mycobacteria as first-line antituberculosis medications. According to World Health Organisation (WHO), between 1980 and 2005, 90 million cases of TB worldwide were reported.

Solanum torvum Swartz (Solanaceae) is a shrub widely distributed in South India, Malaysia, China, Philippines, Thailand, West Indies and Tropical America. Antimicrobial activities of the leaf and fruit of this plant have been reported [4, 5]. The fruits of S. torvum are edible and traditionally used for the treatment of abscesses, jigger wounds, skin infections and athlete’s foot [6]. Pharmacological studies revealed antiviral [7], immunosecretory [8], antioxidant [9], analgesic, anti-inflammatory [10] and antiulcerogenic activities [11]. Chemical constituents reported from this fruit include triacontane derivatives [12, 13], chlorogenone and neochlorogenone [14], isoflavonoid sulfate and steroidal glycosides [7, 15], 22-β-O-spirostanol oligoglycosides [16], 26-β-O-glucosidase [17]; methyl caffeate isolated from S. torvum showed α-glucosidase inhibition activity [18]. Methyl caffeate also showed oxidative stress inhibiting activity [19], anti-platelet activity [20], antiproliferative activity in cervix adenocarcinoma [21] and anticancer activity in lung and leukmia cell lines [22]. Hence the present study was carried out to isolate methyl caffeate from S. torvum fruits and to assess its antimicrobial and antimycobacterial activities. Methyl caffeate showed good antimycobacterial activity. Hence it can be probed further for drug development.

Materials and Methods

Plant Material

Fresh unripe fruits of the Solanum torvum were collected during June 2010 from medicinal farm Koyambedu, Chennai, India. The species was identified by the taxonomist at Entomology Research Institute, Loyola College, Chennai, India. A voucher specimen (No. ERI/ETHPH/ST/120) has been deposited at the herbarium of the institute.

Extraction and Isolation

The collected fruits were shade dried at room temperature and powdered in a hammer mill. One kilogram of the powder was extracted with methanol twice at room temperature for 48 h. The combined extract was evaporated to dryness at 40 °C under reduced pressure. Dark green residue was obtained (50 g). The total methanol extract was chromotographed over silica gel (Merck 60–120 mesh) packed with chloroform. The column was successively eluted with chloroform, chloroform–ethyl acetate mixtures with increasing amounts of ethyl acetate and finally with ethyl acetate:methanol (1:1). Based on thin layer chromatography (TLC) profiles similar fractions were combined to give eleven fractions. When the fractions were bioassayed, fraction 4 (Yield 4.5 g) showed maximum antimicrobial activity. Fraction 4 was further purified using column chromatography and eluted with chloroform:ethyl acetate (4:1); it yielded light yellow crystals of methyl caffeate (70 mg) (m.p.: 156–162).

Bacterial Strains

The following Gram positive, Gram negative bacteria and clinical isolates were used for the experiment. Gram positive bacteria: Staphylococcus aureus MTCC 96, Enterobacter aerogenes MTCC 111, Micrococcus luteus, Staphylococcus epidermidis MTCC 3615, Gram negative bacteria: Shigella flexneri MTCC 1457, Proteus vulgaris MTCC 1771, Klebsiella pneumoniae MTCC 109, Salmonella typhimurium MTCC 1251, Salmonella paratyphi-B, Pseudomonas aeruginosa MTCC 741 and Bacillus subtilis MTCC 441; the clinical isolates : Escherichia coli (ESBL-3984, Extended Spectrum Beta Lactamase), Escherichia coli (ESBL-3904), Klebsiella pneumoniae (ESBL-3971), Klebsiella pneumoniae (ESBL-75799), Klebsiella pneumoniae (ESBL-3894), Klebsiella pneumoniae (ESBL-3967) and Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA-methicillin resistant, clinical pathogen). The reference cultures were obtained from Institute of Microbial Technology (IMTECH), Chandigarh, India-160 036.

Fungal Strains

Candida albicans MTCC 227, Malassesia pachydermatis, Trichophyton mentagrophytes 66/01 and Aspergillus flavus were used for antifungal assays. All the cultures were obtained from the Department of Microbiology, Christian Medical College, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India.

Preparation of Inoculum

Bacterial inoculums were prepared by growing cells in Mueller–Hinton broth (MHB) (Himedia) for 24 h at 37 °C. The filamentous fungi were grown on sabouraud dextrose agar (SDA) slants at 28 °C for 10 days and the spores were collected using sterile doubled distilled water and homogenized. Yeast was grown on sabouraud dextrose broth (SDB) at 28 °C for 48 h.

Antimicrobial Activity

Antibacterial and antifungal activities were carried out using disc-diffusion method [23]. Petri plates were prepared with 20 ml of sterile Mueller–Hinton agar (MHA) (Hi-media, Mumbai). The test cultures were swabbed on the top of the solidified media and allowed to dry for 10 min and a specific amount (25 μl from the 20 mg/ml) of compound was added to each disc. The loaded discs were placed on the surface of the medium and left for 30 min at room temperature for compound diffusion. Negative control was prepared using respective solvents. Streptomycin (10 μg/disc) was used as positive control. The plates were incubated for 24 h at 37 °C for bacteria and for 48 h at 28 °C for fungi. Zones of inhibition were recorded in millimetres and the experiment was repeated twice.

Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC)

Minimum inhibitory concentration studies of the isolated compound were performed according to the standard reference method for bacteria [24], for filamentous fungi [25] and yeasts [26]. The concentrations (500, 250, 100, 50, 25, 12.5 6.25, 3.125 and 1.56 μg/ml) of the compound were dissolved in DMSO (2 %) and used. They were added to each medium in 96 well plates. An inoculum of 100 μl from each well was inoculated. The antifungal agent fluconazole for fungi and antibacterial agent streptomycin for bacteria were included in the assays as positive controls. For fungi, the plates were incubated for 48–72 h at 28 °C and for bacteria the plates were incubated for 24 h at 37 °C. The MIC for fungi was defined as the lowest extract concentration, showing no visible fungal growth after incubation time. 5 μl of tested broth was placed on the sterile MHA plates for bacteria and incubated at respective temperature. The MIC for bacteria was determined as the lowest concentration of the compound inhibiting the visual growth of the test cultures on the agar plate.

Antimycobacterial Assay

The anti-TB activity of methyl caffeate was evaluated against standard sensitive strain Mycobacterium tuberculosis H37Rv and an rifampicin isolate M. tuberculosis Rifr. The MIC was determined using broth micro-dilution assay [2729]. The experiment was performed in sterile Middlebrook 7H9 broth supplemented with10 % ADC (BD Biosciences, USA). The above-mentioned test bacteria were grown to mid-log phase (10–12 days) at 37 °C with shaking in the test media (Middlebrook 7H9 broth supplemented with 10 % ADC). Stock solution (1 mg/ml) of methyl caffeate was prepared in DMSO and 6.4 μl volume of these stock solutions were added to the wells of a 96 well U bottom microtitre plates (Tarson, Mumbai, India) and nine twofold serial dilutions of the compound were prepared in 100 μl of test media. The turbidity of the cultures was adjusted to be equivalent to one McFarland turbidity standard (~1 × 107CFU/ml), which was further diluted 1:10 in test media and a 100 μl volume of this diluted inoculums was added to each well of the plate, resulting in a final inoculums of 5 × 105 CFU/ml. The final concentrations of the methyl caffeate after the addition of inoculums ranged from 0.12 to 32 μg/ml. Rifampicin in the concentration range from 0.12 to 32 μg/ml was used as control drug in the experiment. Periphery wells of the plate were filled with sterile distilled water to prevent evaporation of media in the wells. The plates were incubated at 37 °C under 5 % CO2 for 3 weeks. Inhibition of growth was determined both by visual examination and with a spectrophotometer at an OD600 (Multiskan spectrum; Thermo Scientific, USA). The lowest concentration of the compound showing no turbidity was recorded as MIC.

Statistical Analysis

Antimicrobial activity of methyl caffeate was statistically analyzed by one way Analysis of Variance. Significant differences between the zones of inhibition (mm) were determined using Duncan multiple range test at p = 0.05 with the help of SPSS 11.5 version software package.

Results and Discussion

The methanol extract of S. torvum fruit was previously shown to have in vitro antimicrobial activity against A. pyogenes, B. subtilis, P. aeruginosa, S. aureus, S. pyogenes, A. niger and C. albicans [6]. In the present study methanol extract of S. torvum unripe fruit was fractionated on a silica gel column by eluting with solvents of increasing polarity and the fractions were monitored by TLC. Similar fractions were combined. The active principle was identified as methyl caffeate. The structure was elucidated using spectroscopic methods. IR: V KBr/max = 3484 (hydroxyl), 2955, 2840, 1682 (ester carbonyl), 1601, 1529, 1442 (aromatic), 1367, 1277 (ester C–O–C), 1181, 1105, 974, 850, 812, 773 cm−1. 1H NMR (δ, DMSO-d6, 400 MHz): 6.77 (1H, d, J = 8.0 H2, H-5) 7.00 (1H, dd, J = 8.0 and 2.0 H2, H-6), 7.06 (1H, d, J = 2.0 H2, H-2), 6.27(1H, d, J = 16.0 H2, H-8), 7.49 (1H, d, J = 16.0 H2, H-7), 3.69(3H, S, –COOMe). 13C NMR (δ, DMSO-d6, 100 MHz): 125.50 (C-1), 115.69 (C-2), 145.58(C-3), 148.42(C-4), 114.73(C-5), 121.41(C-6), 145.16(C-7), 115.07(C-8), 167.08 (–COOMe), 51.20 (–COOMe). EI-MS (m/z) for C10H10O4: 194 (M+), 163 [M-OMe]+ 134 [M-60]+. The identity of the compound was confirmed by comparison of the physical and spectroscopic data (IR, 1HNMR, 13CNMR and MS) with those reported in the literature [30] (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Isolated compound methyl caffeate from S. torvum fruit

Methyl caffeate exhibited (Table 1) activity against bacteria using disc diffusion method. The MIC values of methyl caffeate against bacteria and fungi are given in Tables 2 and 3. Methyl caffeate showed only moderate effect when compared to control drugs of fluconazole for fungi and streptomycin for bacteria. P. aeruginosa has emerged as one of the most problematic Gram-negative pathogen, with an alarmingly high antibiotic resistance rate [31, 32]. Even with the most effective antibiotics against this pathogen, namely carbapenems (imipenem and meropenem), the resistance rate was found to be 15–20.4 % amongst 152 P. aeruginosa strains [32]. Our study showed that methyl caffeate was active against P. aeruginosa. This activity might be due to its ability to complex with cell wall [33] to inhibit microbial growth [34]. Methyl caffeate is a phenolic compound and antimicrobial capacity of phenolic compounds is well known [35]. Table 4 shows the MIC values of methyl caffeate against M. tuberculosis using micro-broth dilution assays. Methyl caffeate exhibited potent anti-TB activity against both the tested isolates (8 μg/ml). The MIC values showed good activity against both M. tuberculosis (H37Rv) and M. tuberculosis (RifR) at 8 μg/ml. The methods described here could be useful in determining the mycobactericidal activity of natural products because these assays require smaller volumes and can be performed faster than other methods described by Rastogi et al. [36] and Friis-Moller et al. [37]. Thesium chinense Turcz. has been used as a Korean traditional medicine to treat tuberculosis and methyl caffeate was isolated from it [38]. The in vitro antibacterial and antimycobacterial activities may support the use of S. torvum species in traditional medicine to treat microbial infections. The bioactivity guided fractionation of the methanol extract of the unripe fruit led to the isolation of methyl caffeate as the major active principle. Our experiment suggests that S. torvum, an important medicinal herb in Indian medicine, may be a potent candidate for clinical trial for tuberculosis.

Table 1.

Antimicrobial activity of methyl caffeate isolated from S. torvum (2 mg/ml) using disc-diffusion method (zone of inhibition in mm)

Organism Methyl caffeate Streptomycin (25 μg/disc)
Gram positive
 Staphylococcus aureus 20 ± 0.71f 14 ± 0.71a
 Enterobacter aerogenes 0a 22 ± 0.71c,d
 Micrococcus luteus 9 ± 0.45b 24 ± 0.90d,e
 Shigella flexneri 0a 24 ± 0.90d,e
 Staphylococcus epidermidis 0a 14 ± 0.71a
Gram negative
 Proteus vulgaris 22 ± 0.71g 30 ± 0.71g
 Salmonella typhimurium 12 ± 0.71c 24 ± 0.90d,e
 Salmonella paratyphi-B 16 ± 0.45d 18 ± 0.71b
 Pseudomonasaeruginosa 20 ± 0.71f 30 ± 0.54g
 Bacillus subtilis 19 ± 0.71e 22 ± 0.84c,d
 Klebsiella pneumoniae 9 ± 0.45b 20 ± 0.71b
Fungi Fluconazole
 Candida albicans 20 ± 0.71f 28 ± 0.71f,g
 Aspergillus flavus 22 ± 0.81g 29 ± 0.71f,g

Values in each column followed by the same numerical were not significantly different by Duncan test at p ≤ 0.05. Streptomycin—standard antibacterial agent; fluconazole—standard antifungal agent. No activity—a and b, c, d, e, f, g increasing the mode of activity from lower to higher

Table 2.

Minimum inhibitory concentration (μg/ml) of methyl caffeate isolated from S. torvum against tested bacteria

Organism Methyl caffeate Streptomycin
Gram positive
 Staphylococcus aureus 250 6.25
 Micrococcus luteus 100 6.25
Gram negative
 Proteus vulgaris 50 6.25
 Salmonella paratyphi-B 100 25
 Salmonella typhimurium 500 30
 Pseudomonasaeruginosa 100 25
 Bacillus subtilis 250 25
 Klebsiella pneumoniae 100 6.25
Clinical isolates
 Escherichia coli (ESBL-3984) 250 25
 Escherichia coli (ESBL-3904) 500 25
 Klebsiella pneumoniae (ESBL-3971) 25 6.25
 Klebsiella pneumoniae (ESBL-75799) 100 25
 Klebsiella pneumoniae (ESBL-3894) 500 6.25
 Klebsiella pneumoniae (ESBL-3967) 250 25
 Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) 500 6.25

Streptomycin (standard antibacterial agent); methyl caffeate (isolated compound)

Table 3.

Minimum inhibitory concentration (μg/ml) of methyl caffeate isolated from S. torvum against tested fungi

Organism Methyl caffeate Fluconazole
Candida albicans 250 >100
Malassesia pachydermatis 500 12.5
Trichophyton mentagrophytes 100 25
Aspergillus flavus 100 25

Fluconazole (standard antifungal agent); methyl caffeate (isolated compound)

Table 4.

Minimum inhibitory concentration values for inhibition by methyl caffeate against M. tuberculosis culture using absolute concentration method

Strains Lab code Methyl caffeate MIC (μg/ml) Rifampicin (μg/ml)
M. tuberculosis H37Rv (HR-Sen) (ATCC 27294) H37Rv 8 0.12
M. tuberculosis RifR RifR 8 32

Conclusion

Methyl caffeate isolated from the methanolic extract of the fruits of S. torvum showed moderate antibacterial and antifungal activities against the tested strains when compared to control drugs. Methyl caffeate showed a potent in vitro anti-TB activity against both the tested isolates of M. tuberculosis using micro-broth dilution assays at the dose level of 8 μg/ml. The results showed that methyl caffeate could be probed further in drug discovery programme related to tuberculosis.

Acknowledgments

We thank R. Lakshmi Sundaram, Application Specialist, Central Research Facility, Sri Ramachandra University, for helping in spectroscopy. We are grateful to OSDD-CSIR, New Delhi and Entomology Research Institute, Chennai, for financial assistance.

Contributor Information

Chandrasekhar Balachandran, Email: balaeri09@gmail.com.

Savarimuthu Ignacimuthu, Phone: + 044-28178348, FAX: + 044-28175566, Email: entolc@hotmail.com.

References

  • 1.Estevinho L, Pereira AP, Moreira L, Dias LG, Pereira E. Antioxidant and antimicrobial effects of phenolic compounds extracts of Northeast Portugal honey. Food Chem Toxicol. 2008;46:3774–3779. doi: 10.1016/j.fct.2008.09.062. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Bolivara P, Paredesa CC, Hernándezb LR, Juárezc ZN, Sánchez-Arreolab E, Av-Gaya Y, Bacha H. Antimicrobial, anti-inflammatory, antiparasitic, and cytotoxic activities of Galium mexicanum. J Ethnopharmacol. 2011;137(1):141–147. doi: 10.1016/j.jep.2011.04.069. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Kuete V, Fozing DC, Kapche WFGD, Mbaveng AT, Kuiate JR, Ngadjui BT, Abegaz BM. Antimicrobial activity of the methanolic extract and compounds from Morus mesozygia stem bark. J Ethnopharmacol. 2009;124:551. doi: 10.1016/j.jep.2009.05.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Ajaiyeoba EO. Comparative phytochemical and antimicrobial studies of Solanum macrocarpum and Solanum torvum leaves. Fitoterapia. 1999;70:184. doi: 10.1016/S0367-326X(98)00041-0. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Wiart C, Mogana S, Califa S, Mahan M, Ismael S, Bucle M, Narayana AK, Sulaiman M. Antimicrobial screening of plants used for traditional medicine in the State of Perak, Peninsular Malaysia. Fitoterapia. 2004;75:68. doi: 10.1016/j.fitote.2003.07.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Chah KF, Muko KN, Oboegbulem SI. Antimicrobial activity of methanolic extract of Solanum torvum fruit. Fitoterapia. 2000;71:187–189. doi: 10.1016/S0367-326X(99)00139-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Arthan D, Svasti J, Kittakoop P, Pittayakhachonwut D, Tanticharoen M, Hebtaranonth Y. Antiviral isoflavonoid sulfate and steroidal glycosides from the fruits of Solanum torvum. Phytochemistry. 2002;59:459. doi: 10.1016/S0031-9422(01)00417-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Israf DA, Lajis NH, Somchit MN, Sulaiman MR. Enhancement of ovalbumin specific IgA responses via oral boosting with antigen co-administered with an aqueous Solanum torvum extract. Life Sci. 2004;75:397. doi: 10.1016/j.lfs.2003.10.038. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Sivapriya M, Srinivas L. Isolation and purification of a novel antioxidant protein from the water extract of Sundakai (Solanum torvum) seeds. Food Chem. 2007;104:510. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2006.11.060. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Ndebia EJ, Kamga R, Anye N, Nkeh B. Analgesic and anti-inflammatory properties of aqueous extract from leaves of Solanum torvum (Solanaceae) Afr J Trad Cam. 2007;4:240. doi: 10.4314/ajtcam.v4i2.31214. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Nguelefack TB, Feumebo CB, Ateufack G, Watcho P, Tatsimo S, Atsamo AD, Tane P, Kamanyi A (2008) Antiulcerogenic properties of the aqueous and methanol extracts from the leaves of Solanum torvum Swartz (Solanaceae) in rats. J Ethnopharmacol 119–135 [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 12.Mahmood U, Shukla YN, Thakur RS. Nonalkaloidal constituents from Solanum torvum leaves. Phytochemistry. 1983;22:167. doi: 10.1016/S0031-9422(00)80080-1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Mahmood U, Agrawal PK, Thakur RS. Torvonin A, a spirostane saponin from Solanum torvum leaves. Phytochemistry. 1985;24:2456. doi: 10.1016/S0031-9422(00)83069-1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Carabot CA, Blunden G, Patel VA. Chlorogenone and neochlorogenone from the Unripe fruits of Solanum torvum. Phytochemistry. 1991;199:130–1339. [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Yahara S, Yamashita T, Nozawa N, Nohara T. Steroidal glycosides from Solanum torvum. Phytochemistry. 1996;43:1069. doi: 10.1016/S0031-9422(96)00396-2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Iida Y, Yanai Y, Ono M, Ikeda T, Nohara T. Three unusual 22-β-O-Hydroxy (5a) spirostanol Glycosides from the fruits of Solanum torvum. Chem Pharm Bull. 2005;53:1122. doi: 10.1248/cpb.53.1122. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Arthan D, Kittakoop P, Esen A, Svasti J. Furostanol glycoside 26-β-O-glucosidase from the leaves of Solanum torvum. Phytochemistry. 2006;67:27. doi: 10.1016/j.phytochem.2005.09.035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Takahashi K, Yoshioka Y, Kato E, Katsuki S, Iida O, Hosokawa K, Kawabata J. Methyl caffeate as an α-glucosidase inhibitor from Solanum torvum fruits and the activity of related compounds. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem. 2010;74:741. doi: 10.1271/bbb.90789. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Ishige K, Schubert D, Sagara D. Flavonoids protect neuronal cells from oxidative stress by three distinct mechanisms. Free Radical Bio Med. 2001;30:433. doi: 10.1016/S0891-5849(00)00498-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Pyo MK, Lee YY, ChAnti SHY. Platelet Effect of the Constituents Isolated from the Barks and Fruits of Magnolia obovata. Arch Pharm Res. 2002;25:325. doi: 10.1007/BF02976634. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Fiuza SM, Gomes C, Teixeira LJ, da Cruz MTG, Cordeiro MN, Milhazes N, Borges F, Marques MP. Phenolic acid derivatives with potential anticancer properties–a structure-activity relationship study. Part 1: methyl, propyl and octyl esters of caffeic and gallic acids. Bioorgan Med Chem. 2004;13:3581. doi: 10.1016/j.bmc.2004.04.026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Lee SP, Jun G, Yoon E, Park S, Yang C. Inhibitory effect of methyl caffeate on Fos-Jun-DNA complex formation and suppression of cancer cell growth. B Kor Chem Soc. 2001;22:1131. [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Murray PR, Baron EJ, Pfaller MA, Tenover FC, Yolke RH (1995) Manual of clinical microbiology, vol 6. ASM, Washington, DC
  • 24.Duraipandiyan V, Ignacimuthu S. Antibacterial and antifungal activity of Flindersine isolated from the traditional medicinal plant, Toddalia asiatica (L.) Lam. J Ethnopharmacol. 2009;123:494. doi: 10.1016/j.jep.2009.02.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) Reference method for Broth dilution antifungal susceptibility testing of filamentous fungi; approved standard second edition (2008) CLSI document M38-A2 (ISBN 1-56238-668-9). Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, Wayne
  • 26.NCCLS (2002) M27-A2 reference method for broth dilution antifungal susceptibility testing of yeasts: proposed standard. National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards, Wayne
  • 27.Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (2008) Methods for antimicrobial susceptibility testing of aerobic bacteria approved standard M07-A8, 9th edn. National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards, Wayne
  • 28.Maccari R, Ottana R, Monforte F, Vigorita MG. In vitro antimycobacterial activities of 2-monosubstituted isonicotinohydrazides and their cyanoborane adducts. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2002;46:294–299. doi: 10.1128/AAC.46.2.294-299.2002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Wallace RJ, Nash DR, Steele LC, Steingrube V. Susceptibility testing of slowly growing mycobacteria by a microdilution MIC method with 7H9 broth. J Clin Microbiol. 1986;24:976–981. doi: 10.1128/jcm.24.6.976-981.1986. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Xiang M, Su H, Hu J, Yan Y. Isolation, identification and determination of methyl caffeate, ethyl caffeate and other phenolic compounds from Polygonum amplexicaule var, Sinense. J Med Plan Res. 2011;5:1685. [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Bacq-Calberg CM, Coyotte J, Hoet P, Nguyem-Disteeche M. Microbiologie. Bruxelles: De Boeck and Larcier; 1999. p. 338. [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Savafi L, Duran N, Savafi N, Onlem Y, Ocak S. The prevalence and resistance patterns of Pseudomans aeruginosa in intensive care units in a University Hospital. J Med Sci. 2005;35:317. [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Cowan MM. Plant products as antimicrobial agents. Clin Microbiol Rev. 1999;12:564. doi: 10.1128/cmr.12.4.564. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Arvind S, Reg FC, Enzo AP. Identification of antimicrobial components of an ethanolic extract of the Australian medicinal plant. Eremophila duttonii. Phytother Res. 2004;18:615. doi: 10.1002/ptr.1507. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Pereira JA, Pereira APG, Ferreira ICFR, Valentão P, Andrade PB, Seabra R, Estevinho L. Table olives from Portugal: compounds, antioxidant potential, and antimicrobial activity. J Agr Food Chem. 2006;54:8425. doi: 10.1021/jf061769j. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Rastogi N, Abaul J, Goh KS, Devallois A, Philoge`ne E, Bourgeois P. Antimycobacterial activity of chemically defined natural substances from Caribbean flora in Guadeloupe. FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol. 1998;20:267–273. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-695X.1998.tb01136.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Friis-Moller A, Chen M, Fuursted K, Christensen SB, Kharazmi A. In vitro antimycobacterial and antilegionella activity of licochalcone A from Chinese licorice roots. Planta Med. 2002;68:416–419. doi: 10.1055/s-2002-32087. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Lee K, Kim KH, Choi SU, Lee JH, Lee KR. Phytochemical constitutents of Thesium chinense Turcz and their cytotoxic activities in vitro. Nat Prod Sci. 2009;15:246–249. [Google Scholar]

Articles from Indian Journal of Microbiology are provided here courtesy of Springer

RESOURCES