Abstract
In this study, antibacterial activity of metabolites secreted by the phase I variant of Photorhabdus luminescens was investigated. Bioactivity of these metabolites was screened against 28 different bacterial species and strains. Bacterial sensitivity was determined by a modified-version of the Kirby–Bauer disk diffusion susceptibility method, whereas the phase I variant’s culture permeate was utilized as the “antibacterial” agent. This investigation demonstrates that 11 of the 28 bacterial species tested were sensitive to at least one of the secreted compounds or a combination thereof.
Keywords: Photorhabdus luminescens, Phase variation, Antimicrobials, Heterorhabditis bacteriophora
Photorhabdus luminescens is a Gram-negative, bioluminescent, phase-varying, enteric bacterium that is symbiotically associated with the entomoparasitic nematode Heterorhabditis bacteriophora. Infective juvenile nematodes of H. bacteriophora are able to penetrate the host insect and migrate to the hemocoel where they release phase I cells of P. luminescens into the hemolymph [1–5]. After release, the bacterial symbiont proliferates killing the insect within 24–48 h by the production of toxins whereas other biomolecules such as pigments and antimicrobials are produced upon death of the insect [6–10].
Li et al. [11] identified two anthraquinone-derived pigments (3,8-dimethoxy-1-hydroxy-9,10-anthraquinone and 1,3-dimethoxy-8-hydroxy-9,10-anthraquinone) and demonstrated their antimicrobial properties. The same researchers also identified a secreted antibiotic (3,5-dihydroxy-4-isopropylstilbene) which is effective against fungi. Furthermore, the authors did not describe the modes of action for any of these compounds. In the present investigation, the Kirby–Bauer disk diffusion antibiotic susceptibility method [12] was modified to observe the bioactivity of the secreted metabolites produced by P. luminescens. Activity was determined by testing blank paper discs impregnated with a filter-sterilized culture permeate of phase I cells against bacterial lawns of 28 species and strains.
Isolation of phase I cells was performed aseptically by dissecting infected insects that exhibited luminescence and red pigmentation as described by Inman and Holmes [13] and confirmed utilizing conventional tests [14–16]. A Sartorius Stedim Biostat® A plus bioreactor containing nutrient broth supplemented with 2.0 % trehalose was inoculated with phase I cells. Process parameters: agitation (100 rpm); air flow (1 vvm) and pH (7.20). Cultivation was ended after 24 h. A cell-free permeate was generated from tangential-flow filtration and filter-sterilized. Sterile, blank disks were impregnated with the permeate and dried.
Colonies of each microbe were suspended in tryptic soy broth and incubated at 30 °C until turbidity reached that of a 0.5 MacFarland standard. Aliquots of each culture were spread onto Muller-Hinton plates to prepare bacterial lawns. Impregnated discs and blank disks were placed onto the agar and incubated for 24 h at 30 °C. Antibacterial screening of each organism was performed in replicates of three and the diameter of the three zones was averaged.
Measurements of bacterial sensitivity are seen in Table 1. Upon analysis, 11 species of bacteria tested were sensitive to at least one of the secreted compounds. Gram-negative bacilli were not sensitive; however, all members of Neisseriaceae were. Further analysis suggests that Gram-positive cocci of Micrococcaceae were sensitive; however, Streptococcaceae were not. As far as Bacillus is concerned, two species were not sensitive.
Table 1.
Microbe | Zone diameter (mm) |
---|---|
Bacillus cereus | 11 |
B. licheniformis | 0 |
B. megaterium | 13 |
B. subtilis | 16 |
B. subtilisa | 17 |
B. thuringiensis | 0 |
Citrobacter freundii | 0 |
Enterobacter aerogenes | 0 |
E. cloacae | 0 |
Enterococcus faecalis | 0 |
Escherichia coli | 0 |
E. coli K12-wt | 0 |
Klebsiella pneumoniae | 0 |
Lactococcus (Streptococcus) lactis | 0 |
Micrococcus luteus | 12 |
Moraxella catarrhalis | 19 |
Neisseria sicca | 27 |
N. subflava | 26 |
Pseudomonas aeruginosa | 0 |
P. fluorescens | 0 |
Salmonella enteritidis | 0 |
S. typhimurium | 0 |
Serratia marcescens | 0 |
Sporosarcina ureae | 18 |
Staphylococcus epidermidis | 12 |
S. simulans | 13 |
Streptococcus durans | 0 |
S. mutans | 0 |
aAntibiotic-producing strain
The results of this study show that one or more of the secreted compounds were effective against 39 % of the bacterial species screened. Accordingly, P. luminescens may be a new attractive source of antimicrobial drugs, especially for treating infections caused by Gram-negative cocci. Furthermore, more research is needed to specify the responsible compound for such sensitivity.
Acknowledgments
Partial financial support for this study was provided in part by the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Development Grant 5G11HD052381-05 and the North Carolina Biotechnology Center Grant 2010-IDG-1008. The content of this article is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the funding organizations.
References
- 1.Boemare NE, Laumond C, Mauleon H. The entomopathogenic nematode-bacterium complex: biology, life cycle and vertebrate safety. Biocontrol Sci Technol. 1996;6:333–345. doi: 10.1080/09583159631316. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Clark DJ. Photorhabdus: a model for the analysis of pathogenicity and mutualism. Cell Microbiol. 2008;10:2159–2167. doi: 10.1111/j.1462-5822.2008.01209.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Strauch O, Ehlers RU. Food signal production of Photorhabdus luminescens inducing recovery of entomopathogenic nematodes Heterorhabditis spp. in liquid culture. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 1998;50:369–374. doi: 10.1007/s002530051306. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Krasomil-Osterfeld K. Phase II variants of Photorhabdus luminescens are induced by growth in low-osmolarity medium. Symbiosis. 1997;22:155–165. [Google Scholar]
- 5.Smigielski AJ, Akhurst RJ, Boemare NE. Phase variation in Xenorhabdus nematophilus and Photorhabdus luminescens: differences in respiratory activity and membrane energization. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1994;60:120–125. doi: 10.1128/aem.60.1.120-125.1994. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Ehlers RU, Stoessel S, Wyass U. The influence of phase variants of Xenorhabdus spp. and Escherichia coli (Enterobacteriaceae) on the propagation of entomopathogenic nematodes of the genera Steinernema and Heterorhabditis. Rev Nematol. 1990;13:417–424. [Google Scholar]
- 7.Gerritsen LJM, Smits PH. The influence of Photorhabdus luminescens strains and form variants on the reproduction and bacterial retention of Heterorhabditis megidis. Fundam Appl Nematol. 1997;20:317–322. [Google Scholar]
- 8.Forst S, Nealson K. Molecular biology of the symbiotic-pathogenic bacteria Xenorhabdus spp. and Photorhabdus spp. Microbiol Rev. 1996;60:21–43. doi: 10.1128/mr.60.1.21-43.1996. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Waterfield NR, Ciche T, Clarke D. Photorhabdus and a host of hosts. Annu Rev Microbiol. 2009;63:557–574. doi: 10.1146/annurev.micro.091208.073507. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Richardson WH, Schmidt TM, Nealson KH. Identification of an anthraquinone pigment and a hydroxystilbene antibiotic from Xenorhabdus luminescens. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1988;54:1602–1605. doi: 10.1128/aem.54.6.1602-1605.1988. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Li J, Chen G, Wu H, Webster JM. Identification of two pigments and a hydroxystilbene antibiotic from Photorhabdusluminescens. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1995;61:4329–4333. doi: 10.1128/aem.61.12.4329-4333.1995. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Bauer AW, Kirby WMM, Sherris JC, Turk M. Antibiotic susceptibility testing by a standardized single disk method. Am J Clin Pathol. 1966;45:493–496. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Inman FL, Holmes LD. The effects of trehalose on the bioluminescence and pigmentation of the phase I variant of Photorhabdusluminescens. J Life Sci. 2012;6:119–129. [Google Scholar]
- 14.Akhurst RJ. Morphological and functional dimorphism in Xenorhabdus spp., bacteria associated with the insect pathogenic nematodes Neoaplectana and Heterorhabditis. J Gen Microbiol. 1980;121:303–309. [Google Scholar]
- 15.Singh S, Moreau E, Inman FL, Holmes LD. Characterization of Photorhabdusluminescens growth for the rearing of the beneficial nematode Heterorhabditisbacteriophora. Indian J Microbiol. 2011 doi: 10.1007/s12088-011-0238-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Inman FL, Singh S, Holmes LD. Mass production of the beneficial nematode Heterorhabditisbacteriophora and its bacterial symbiont Photorhabdusluminescens. Indian J Microbiol. 2012 doi: 10.1007/s12088-012-0270-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]