Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Dec 10.
Published in final edited form as: Nat Commun. 2012 Mar 13;3:741. doi: 10.1038/ncomms1730

Fast and ultrasensitive method for quantitating prion infectivity titer

Natallia Makarava a,b, Regina Savtchenko a,b, Irina Alexeeva c, Robert G Rohwer c,d, Ilia V Baskakov a,b
PMCID: PMC3518416  NIHMSID: NIHMS425496  PMID: 22415832

Abstract

Bioassay by end-point dilution has been employed for decades for routine determination of prion infectivity titer. Here we show that the new Protein Misfolding Cyclic Amplification with Teflon beads (PMCAb) can be used to estimate titers of the misfolded version of the prion protein (PrPSc) with a higher level of precision and in 3 to 6 days as opposed to two years, when compared with bioassay. For two hamster strains 263K and SSLOW, median infective doses (ID50) determined by PCMAb (PMCAb50) were found to be 1012.8 and 1012.2 per gram of brain tissue, which are 160- and 4,000-fold higher than the corresponding ID50 values measured by bioassay. These 102-103-fold differences could be attributed to a large excess of PMCAb-reactive prion protein seeds with little or no infectivity. Alternatively, the differences between ID50 and PMCAb50 could be due to higher rate of clearance of PrPSc seeds in animals versus PMCAb reactions. A well calibrated PMCAb reaction can be an efficient and cost effective method for the estimation of PrPSc titer.


A pathognomonic hallmark of the prion diseases is the accumulation of the misfolded isoform of the prion protein (PrPSc). The traditional method for obtaining a quantitative estimate of prion infectivity is end-point dilution titration in animals. A suspension of the tissue or fluid of interest is diluted in ten fold serial steps and then each dilution is inoculated into a group of animals. A dilution at which only a fraction of the inoculated animals develops clinical signs of disease or shows positive evidence of PrPSc on immunoassay is called a “limiting dilution”. At limiting dilution there are only one or a few infectious doses per inoculation volume. End point dilution titers are typically expressed as the median infective dose (ID50): the reciprocal of the dilution required to infect only 50% of the animals inoculated as determined by interpolation or other statistical methods. While the end-point bioassay has been the principal method for determining prion infectivity, the assay is extremely long, expensive and laborious. Moreover, the bioassay works optimally only for prion strains with incubation times well within the life span of the host.

Alternatives to end-point titration are biochemical or immunochemical assays that assess either the presence, mass or concentration of PrPSc1,2,3,4. However, establishing accurate quantitative relationships between PrPSc concentration and prion titer has proven to be difficult because of the size heterogeneity of prion particles and uncertainty over whether all prion particles are equally infectious 5,6,7. Moreover, the size distribution and physical properties of prion particles appear to vary with agent strain and host species 6. In 2003, Weismann and co-workers introduced a scrapie cell assay that quantitatively estimates prion infectivity titers within much shorter time frame than animal bioassay 8. The scrapie cell assay was shown to be capable of detecting prions in as low as 1010-fold diluted scrapie-infected brain material 9. Moreover, in recent studies the scrapie cell assay was adapted for detecting prions from various species 10.

Protein Misfolding Cyclic Amplification (PMCA) propagates PrPSc and infectivity in vitro 11-14. The sensitivity of the PMCA reaction to detect prion particles exceeds that of the bioassay 15, 16. While PMCA has been proven for detecting and amplifying prions from a broad range of species including human, cow, sheep, cervids, mouse, hamster and others 16-26, highly robust PMCA amplification has been limited to mostly rodent and rodent-adapted strains. Nevertheless, the efficiency of prion replication in PMCA was shown to mimic cross-species transmission barrier 27-29 or genetic susceptibility of sheep to scrapie that occurs due to prion protein polymorphisms 19. The improvements in the PMCA assay found in PMCA with beads (PMCAb) have resulted in a much faster, more robust, sensitive and cost-efficient way of measuring PrPSc compared with either PMCA or bioassay 29, 30.

To illustrate the advantages of PMCAb based end point titration, we assessed the relative concentrations of PrPSc in brain material of two rodent strains, 263K and SSLOW, which display very short or very long incubation time to symptomatic disease, respectively 31. We show that using PMCAb format PrPSc titration can be performed in only a few days. We also observed strain-specific differences in the specific infectivity relative to PMCAb-based PrPSc titer ranging from hundred to thousands of PMCAb active particles per intra-cranial infectious dose 50 (ic ID50).

Results

End-point dilution titration using PMCAb

The PMCAb amplification was initiated by “seeding” a substrate of uninfected brain homogenate with PrPSc. To determine the concentration of PMCAb seeds, 10% brain homogenates prepared from 263K or SSLOW-infected animas were diluted in ten fold serial steps, then aliquots from each dilution were used to seed serial PMCAb reactions. Up to ten independent serial PMCAb reactions were conducted for each dilution for each strain. Each PMCAb round consisted of 48 cycles, 30 min each. Three or six serial PMCAb rounds were sufficient for amplification of even the highest dilutions of 263K or SSLOW, respectively (Fig. 1a,b), to the level detectible by Western blot. An increase in number of PMCAb rounds did not increase the percentage of positive reactions for the most highly diluted samples illustrating that the limiting dilution was reached (Fig. 1c).

Figure 1. End-point sPMCAb titration.

Figure 1

10% scrapie brain material from SSLOW- (a) or 263K infected animals (b, c) were diluted in ten fold serial steps, then aliquots from each dilution were used to seed serial PMCAb reactions. Example of a Western blot of sPMCA products amplified for 6 rounds is shown in plots a and b. Panel c shows products of PMCAb reactions seeded with four dilutions and amplified for 2, 3 or 6 serial rounds. The dilutions shown for PMCAb reactions were normalized per gram of brain tissue, to correct for differences in assay volumes used for PMCAb (100 μl) and bioassay (50 μl).

In our experience, PMCAb displays a high level of selectivity for infection-specific forms of PrP. To date we have detected no false positive amplifications in the routine control reactions that are included with every PMCAb titration experiment. These controls consist of six serial rounds of 48 cycles of PMCAb on unseeded substrate only. Other controls include six rounds of serial PMCAb on 10% normal brain homogenates from 700-day old hamsters (Fig. 2), and PMCAb amplifications on hamster substrate seeded with full-length recombinant hamster PrP amyloid fibrils prepared under a variety of previously described experimental conditions and protocols 32-35. No positive signals were detected in any of the controls (Fig. 2).

Figure 2. Testing the specificity of PrPSc detection in sPMCAb.

Figure 2

sPMCAb reactions were seeded with 10% NBH from 700 day old S. hamsters (lanes 5 and 6), recombinant PrP (rPrP) amyloid fibrils type I not subjected to annealing (lane 7); fibrils type I subjected to annealing in Triton (lane 8), BSA (lane 9) or NBH (lanes 10, 11 and 12); with rPrP amyloid fibrils type II (lane 13); or 1011-fold diluted SSLOW brain material (lane14). Four non-seeded reactions are shown in lanes 1, 2, 3 and 4. Six rounds of sPMCAb were conducted for each seeded condition and non-seeded reaction. The final concentration of rPrP amyloid fibrils in sPMCAb reactions was 10 μg/ml. rPrP fibrils were prepared using Syrian Hamster full-length rPrP; fibrils type I were prepared in 1M GdnHCl and 3M urea as described by Bocharova et al 32; fibrils type II were prepared in 0.5 M GdnHCl as described by Sun et al 34. rPrP fibrils type I were subjected to annealing in 1% Tritorn X-100, 5 mg/ml BSA, or 5% NBH as described by Bocharova et al.33 and Makarava et al. 31. After six sPMCAb rounds, all samples were treated with PK as described in Methods; Western blots were stained with 3F4. To rigorously test the specificity of sPMCAb for detecting PrPSc, multiple experiments were performed using four Misonix S-4000 sonicators over a two year period. Several independently prepared stocks of rPrP amyloid fibrils of each type were produced using rPrP from several independent purifications. All results on sPMCAb seeding by rPrP fibrils were negative, confirming that sPMCAb is highly specific for PrPSc.

End-point dilution titration in animals

In parallel to PMCAb titration, the infectivity titers of brains from 263K and SSLOW-infected animals were measured using end-point dilution bioassay. Animals were considered infected if they develop symptomatic disease or if their brains contained PrPSc as judged by Western blot even without symptomatic disease. The fractions of animals infected at each dilution are presented in Table 1.

Table 1.

Summary of end-point titration of 263 and SSLOW

Dilution of brain material Number of animals infected#/total number
263K SSLOW
101 8/8
102 8/8
103 8/8
104 8/8
105 12/12 5/5
106 12/12 8/8
107 11/11 5/8
108 55/59 2/8
109 107/153 0/8
1010 2/12 0/6
1011 0/12 0/8
#

animals were considered infected if they were symptomatic or positive for PrPSc by Western blotting

Analysis of prion titer

For each dilution, the fraction of animals infected or the fraction of PMCAb reactions with a positive signal on Western blot were plotted against the logarithm of dilution for both 263K and SSLOW (Fig. 3). At limiting dilution, PrPSc particles must necessarily assort randomly into the reaction aliquots and their distribution is described by the Poisson equation. While there was a good fit to the Poisson equation by the animal infectivity data for both 263K and SSLOW, the PMCAb titration curves for both strains showed a more gradual slope than predicted by the Poisson equation (Fig. 3a). This is consistent with increasing reaction efficiency at higher dilutions. One possibility is that dilution results in a concentration-dependent dissociation of aggregates, thereby releasing and increasing the concentration of PMCAb reactive centers. Alternatively, dilution might diminish the effects of an inhibitor. Since the effect is at very high dilutions, the inhibitor alternative seems less likely.

Figure 3. Correlation of prion infectivity titer by end-point titration bioassay with PMCAb activity.

Figure 3

Brain homogenate materials from Syrian Hamsters infected with SSLOW (green symbols) or 263K (red symbols) were subjected to 10-fold serial dilution, then each dilution was analyzed by animal bioassay or serial PMCAb. Percentage of animals infected (squares) or giving positive PMCAb reactions (triangles) is plotted as a function of dilution. (a) Analysis of the data using Poisson function, where the solid curves represent the results of nonlinear least-square best fit. Analysis of the data for SSLOW (b) or 263K (c) using sigmoidal function. The solid curves represent the results of nonlinear least-square best fit and the blue curves represent 95% confidence intervals. ID50 and PMCAb50 values were calculated from the results of fitting.

An arbitrary sigmoidal function and non-linear regression analysis were used to calculate ID50 or PMCAb50 values from bioassay- or PMCAb-based end point curves, respectively (Fig. 3c,d, Table 2). (Note that the Poisson equation is a special instance of the more generalized sigmoidal function used.) The infectivity titers determined in this way were almost identical to those determined by the Poisson equation or by more traditional application of the Reed and Meunch and Spearman and Karber methods (Table 2). Analogous to the bioassay, a PMCAb50 is the reciprocal of the concentration at which only 50% of the PMCAb reactions were positive. As judged from ID50 and PMCAb50 values, PMCAb was more sensitive than bioassay by ~4,000 fold for SSLOW and ~160 fold in the case of 263K. Importantly, PMCAb titration was completed in a few days, whereas the bioassay required nearly two years.

Table 2.

ID50 values measured by end-point bioassay or PMCAb

Assay50 units/g of tissue Ratio
Bioassay* ID50 Bioassay# ID50 PMCAb# PMCAb50 #PMCAb50/#ID50
263K 1010.5 1010.6 1012.8 160
SSLOW 108.7 108.6 1012.2 4000
*

the ID50 values were estimated using the Poisson equation

#

the ID50 values were estimated using the sigmoidal equation

Discussion

We show here that PMCAb, when well calibrated against bioassay, can be used to obtain an estimate PrPSc titer in only 3 to 6 days, approximately 100 times faster than the bioassay. At the same time, PMCAb offers ethical advantages of avoiding the need for animal use. The precision of the measurements in PMCAb is limited only by the number of replicates performed. The new PMCAb-based assay can be used as a fast, efficient and ultrasensitive method for determining PrPSc titer and is uniquely beneficial for samples that have extremely low levels of infectivity and for determining infectivity concentrations for prion strains with long incubation times. On the other hand, while PMCA has been employed for amplification of PrPSc from a wide range of species 16, 18-25, the most robust amplification was achieved so far for a limited number of rodent or rodent-adapted strains. Further technical improvements are needed for PMCA to be used as a platform for quantitative estimates of PrPSc from a broad range of species.

In recent studies, Soto and coworkers, estimated the amount of PrPSc based on the number of PMCA rounds necessary to amplify prions to a detectible level 16. While PMCAb and PMCA methods have similar sensitivities for detection of 263K, PMCA requires 18 days to reach sensitivity comparable to that achieved by PMCAb in 3 days. Furthermore, PMCA did not work well for amplification of SSLOW PrPSc29. PMCAb is also far less sensitive to inhibitors and small variations in sonication conditions that have plagued conventional PMCA.

It is of interest to consider the molecular relationship of PMCAb titer to prion infectivity. A PMCAb50 titer represents the number of PMCAb-active, PrPSc-particles capable of initiating PMCAb amplification per gram of material sampled. Both PMCAb amplification products and PrPSc are heterogeneous in at least size, and perhaps structure, and exactly which structures represent infectivity is not yet clear. Furthermore, contradictory data exists regarding specific infectivity of PMCA-generated versus that of brain-derived PrPSc36, 37.

Close comparison of the two sets of data, obtained from the end-point dilution titration on animals and PMCAb, permits establishing a quantitative relationship. The ratio of PMCAb50/ID50 reports on a number of PMCAb active particles that corresponds to one prion infectious dose or unit. The PMCAb50/ID50 ratio was found to be 160 and 4,000 particles per one infectious does for 263K and SSLOW, respectively (Table 2). There are several ways to explain 102-103 -fold excess in a number of PMCAb-active particles over the number of the infectious doses. The large PMCAb50/ID50 ratio could be interpreted as only a few or one out of each 160 or 4,000 PrPSc particles being truly infectious, whereas the majority of particles while detectible and amplifiable by PMCAb has little or no infectivity. Consistent with this interpretation, recent studies reported a dissociation between PMCA seeding ability and biological infectivity for PrPSc seeds produced from PrP constructs with deletions of polybasic domains 38. Furthermore, the studies by Klingeborn and co-workers showed that PrPSc generated in PMCA had considerably lower infectivity titer than that of brain-derived PrPSc36. This work suggested that two competitive PMCA pathways that amplify infectious PrPSc and non-infectious particles exist. In contrast, the work by Shikiya and Bartz reported that PMCA-generated PrPSc had a titer similar to that of brain-derived PrPSc37. Further studies are needed to clarify these contradictory results.

Alternatively, the differences between ID50 and PMCAb50 values might reflect substantial differences in obstacles to successfully initiate prion infection in an animal versus PMCAb reaction, respectively. It has been reported that prions inoculated into animals are subject to intensive proteolytic degradation and clearance 39. In contrast, the PMCAb amplification is conducted in the presence of protease inhibitors to prevent degradation of the normal prion protein substrate for conversion. It is conceivable that this environment also preserves a greater fraction of infectious, PMCAb-active particles thereby accounting for the ~102-103 fold greater sensitivity of the PMCAb assay.

Strain 263K (short incubation, short clinical duration) and SSLOW (very long incubation and clinical duration 31) represent the two extremes of prion hamster disease. Nevertheless, the concentration of PMCAb reactive particles was similar in brains of animals infected with 263K or SSLOW (Table 2). No PMCAb-reactive particles were found in brains from aged animals confirming that these particles are disease-specific. In contrast to similar PMCAb50 values, the infectivity titer was ~100 fold lower for SSLOW than for 263K (Table 2). The PMCAb50/ID50 ratio was 160 and 4,000 particles for 263K and SSLOW, respectively (Table 2). If the hypothesis that PMCAb amplifies infectious and non-infectious prion protein seeds is correct, then PMCAb50/ID50 value reflects a strain-specific ratio of non-infectious, disease-associate PMCAb-reactive particles per infectious PrPSc seeds. Alternatively, the difference in the PMCAb50/ID50 ratio could also reflect the strain-specific differences in the amount of PMCAb active particles required for infecting an animal. The difference in efficiency of infection between the two strains could be attributed to several factors. First, the differences could be due to differences in strain-specific rates of PrPSc clearance upon inoculation. Second, the PrPSc species that is the most reactive in PMCAb might be not the one that is the most toxic. In fact, previous studies pointed on an uncoupling of prion infectious titer and neurotoxicity 40. While PMCAb presumably counts PrPSc particles, the read-out parameter for bioassay is the presence of clinical or subclinical disease, which is a result of accumulation of neurotoxic PrP species. Therefore, if infectious and neurotoxic PrP species are two different entities, the differences in PMCAb50/ID50 value could be interpreted as a reflection of a complex strain-specific relationship between a PMCAb active PrPSc species and a neurotoxic species.

The strain-specific difference in the PMCAb50/ID50 ratio was mainly due to substantially lower ID50 titer of SSLOW in comparison to that of 263K. We do not know whether we would have eventually seen an ID50 for SSLOW equivalent to that of 263K, if hamsters have longer life spans in which to develop infections from low titer inocula. In this respect, PMCAb offers advantageous over the bioassay for titering slow prion strains, as the read-out parameter in PMCAb is not limited by the life span of an animal.

Further comparison of end-point titration data from bioassay and PMCAb will test whether PMCAb50/ID50 ratio represents an inherent strain-specific property. Fortunately, uncertainties as to the relationship of PMCAb-active particles to infectivity do not diminish the power or usefulness of PMCAb as a quantitative assay. PMCAb can be used as is, as a relative indicator of infectivity titer between two similar samples. With careful calibration and sample control it can be used to estimate PrPSc infectivity titer itself.

Methods

End-point titration bioassay

This study was carried out in strict accordance with the recommendations in the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals of the National Institutes of Health. The protocol was approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of the University of Maryland, Baltimore (Assurance Number A32000-01; Permit Number: 0309001). 10% scrapie brain homogenate (BH) was prepared in PBS, pH 7.4 by sonication and serially diluted up to 1011 fold in PBS as previously described 41. SSLOW-inoculated animals from the second passage of SSLOW 31 were used for both bioassay and PMCAb. Before inoculation, samples were dispersed by 90 seconds of maximum power ultrasonication in PBS. Each hamster received 50 μl inoculum intracerebrally under general anesthesia (2% O2/ 4 MAC isoflurane). The inoculated animals were observed closely up to 660 days post inoculation or until they developed clinical signs of prion disease. For SSLOW-inoculated animals, the clinical signs were observed as early as 318±10 days post inoculation for the 10 fold dilution of brain material or as late as 560±10 days for the 106 fold dilution of brain material. Only one out of eight animals inoculated with 107 fold dilution showed clinical signs, whereas no clinical signs were observed for dilutions 108 fold and above. Affected animals were euthanized and their disease status was confirmed by Western blot analysis of their brains. At the end of the incubation (660 days post inoculation) all remaining animals were euthanized and all brains were assessed for the presence of PrPSc by Western blot. Animals, whose brains contained PrPSc but had not yet developed symptomatic disease were considered infected.

End-point titration using PMCAb

Healthy hamsters were euthanized and immediately perfused with PBS, pH 7.4, supplemented with 5 mM EDTA. Brains were dissected, and 10% brain homogenate (w/v) was prepared using ice-cold conversion buffer and glass/Teflon tissue grinders cooled on ice and attached to a constant torque homogenizer (Heidolph RZR2020). The brains were ground at low speed until homogeneous, then 5 additional strokes completed the homogenization. The composition of conversion buffer was as previously described 11: Ca2+-free and Mg2+-free PBS, pH 7.4 supplemented with 0.15 M NaCl, 1.0% Triton and 1 tablet of Complete protease inhibitors cocktail (Roche, Cat. # 1836145) per 50 ml of conversion buffer. The resulting 10% normal brain homogenate (NBH) in conversion buffer was used as the substrate in PMCA reactions. To prepare seeds, scrapie infected brains were homogenized as for inoculation (above), and 100 μl aliquots were sonicated in MISONIX S-400 microplate horn for 30 sec at 50% power before serial dilution from 10- to 1014-fold in conversion buffer. Then, 10 μl of each dilution was used to seed 90 μl of NBH in PMCAb. Teflon beads (2.38 mm diameter, McMaster-Carr, Los Angeles, CA) were placed into the 0.2 ml tubes first, then NBH and seeds were added. Samples in 0.2 ml thin-wall PCR tubes (Fisher, Cat. # 14230205) were placed in a floating rack inside a Misonix S-4000 microplate cup horn filled with 350 ml water. Two coils of rubber tubing attached to a circulating water bath were installed for maintaining 37°C inside the sonicator chamber. The standard sonication program consisted of 30 sec sonication pulses delivered at 50% efficiency applied every 30 min during a 24 hour period. For each subsequent round of serial PMCAb, 10 μl aliquotes from a previous round were used to seed the reactions in the next round. At limiting dilutions, up to ten independent serial PMCAb reactions were used for each dilution to accumulate statistics.

Data analysis

To correct for differences in assay volumes used for PMCAb (100 μl) and bioassay (50 μl) the fraction of positive PMCAb reactions or positive animals presented in Figure 3 were normalized per gram of brain tissue.

Analysis using Poisson equation

For the probability that a given aliquot received no active particle, P(0), the Poisson equation reduces to P(0) = e-m, where m is the concentration of the active particle at that dilution in particles per inoculation volume. The probability that there will be at least one active particle to initiate infection, P(≥1), is P(≥1) = 1 - e-m. The infectivity data were fit to the expression:

F=1-exp(-ax) (1)

where F is fraction of infected animals, x is dilution and a is the fitted parameter equal to the undiluted concentration of infectivity. ID50 was calculated by solving the fitted equations for F equals 0.5 (infectivity), which reduce to the expression:

ID50=-ln(0.5)a (2)

Analysis using sigmoidal equation

ID50 and PMCAb50 values were determined by regression analysis in Sigma Plot using nonlinear least squares fitting of both sets of data to the sigmoidal equation:

F=(100exp(-(A+Bx)))(1+exp(-(A+Bx))) (3)

where F is percent of positive PMCAb reactions or infected animals, x is logarithm of the dilution fold, A and B are two fitting parameters that define the position of a limiting dilution transition on the x axis and the slope of the transition, respectively. ID50 and PMCAb50 were calculated according to the equation:

PMCAb50orID50=AB (4)

Proteinase K assay

To analyze the PMCAb end point titration reactions, 10 μl of each sample was supplemented with 5 μl SDS and 5 μl PK, to a final concentration of SDS and PK of 0.25% and 50 μg/ml respectively, followed by incubation at 37μC for 1 hour. The digestion was terminated by addition of SDS sample buffer and boiling for 10 min. Samples were loaded onto NuPAGE 12% BisTris gels, transferred to PVDF membrane, and stained with 3F4 antibody.

To analyze scrapie brain homogenates, an aliquot of 10% brain homogenate was mixed with an equal volume of 4% sarcosyl in PBS, supplemented with 50 mM Tris, pH 7.5, and digested with 20 μg/ml PK for 30 min at 37°C with 1000 rpm shaking (Eppendorf thermomixer). The reaction was stopped by SDS sample buffer. Samples were boiled for 10 min and loaded onto NuPAGE 12% BisTris gels. After transfer to PVDF membrane, PrP was detected with 3F4 antibody.

Acknowledgments

We thank Pamela Wright for editing the manuscript. This work was supported by NIH grant NS045585 to IVB, and VA Merit Award to RGR.

Footnotes

Author contributions

N.M., R.S., and I.A. carried out the work. N.M., R.G.R., and I.V.B. designed the study and analyzed the data. I.V.B and R.G.R. wrote the manuscript. All authors commented on the final manuscript.

Competing financial interests: The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Reference List

  • 1.Wadsworth JD, et al. Tissues distribution of protease resistant prion protein in variant Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease using a highly sensitive immunobloting assay. Lancet. 2001;358:171–180. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(01)05403-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Safar JG, et al. Measuring prions causing bovine spongiform encephalopathy or chronic wasting disease by immunoassays and transgenic mice. Nat. Biotechnol. 2002;20:1147–1150. doi: 10.1038/nbt748. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Edgeworth JA, et al. Detection of prion infection in variant Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease: a blood-based assay. Lancet. 2011;377:487–493. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)62308-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Gregori L, et al. A sensitive and quantitative assay for normal PrP in plasma. J. Virol Methods. 2008;149:251–259. doi: 10.1016/j.jviromet.2008.01.028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Silveira JR, et al. The most infectious prion protein particles. Nature. 2005;437:257–261. doi: 10.1038/nature03989. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Tixador P, et al. The physical relationship between infectivity and prion protein aggregates is strain-dependent. PLOS Pathog. 2010;6:e1000859. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1000859. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Barron RM, et al. High titer of transmissible spongiform encephalopathy infectivity associated with extremely low levels of PrPSc in vitro. J. Biol. Chem. 2007:35878–35886. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M704329200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Klöhn PC, Stoltze L, Flechsig E, Enari M, Weissmann C. A quantitative, highly sensitive cell-based infectivity assay for mouse scrapie prions. Proc. Acad. Natl. Sci. U. S. A. 2003;100:11666–11671. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1834432100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Edgeworth JA, Jackson GS, Clarke AR, Weissmann C, Collinge J. Highly sensitive, quantitative cell-based assay for prions adsorbed to solid surfaces. Proc. Acad. Natl. Sci. U. S. A. 2009;3479 doi: 10.1073/pnas.0813342106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Arellano-Anaya ZE, et al. A Simple, Versatile and Sensitive Cell-Based Assay for Prions from Various Species. Plos ONE. 2011;6:e20563. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0020563. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Castilla J, Saa P, Hetz C, Soto C. In vitro generation of infectious scrapie prions. Cell. 2005;121:195–206. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2005.02.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Saborio GP, Permanne B, Soto C. Sensitive detection of pathological prion protein by cyclic amplification of protein misfolding. Nature. 2001;411:810–813. doi: 10.1038/35081095. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Deleault NR, Harris BT, Rees JR, Supattapone S. Formation of native prions from minimal components in vitro. Proc. Acad. Natl. Sci. U. S. A. 2007;104:9741–9746. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0702662104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Wang F, Wang X, Yuan C-G, Ma J. Generating a Prion Bacterially Expressed Recombinant Prion Protein. Science. 2010;327:1132–1135. doi: 10.1126/science.1183748. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Saa P, Castilla J, Soto C. Ultra-efficient Replication of Infectious Prions by Automated Protein Misfolding Cyclic Amplification. J. Biol. Chem. 2006;281:35245–35252. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M603964200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Chen B, Morales R, Barria MA, Soto C. Estimating prion concentration in fluids and tissues by quantitative PMCA. Nat Methods. 2010;7:519–520. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.1465. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Deleault NR, Lucassen RW, Supattapone S. RNA molecules stimulate prion protein conversion. Nature. 2003;425:717–720. doi: 10.1038/nature01979. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Haley NJ, et al. Detection of chronic wasting disease prions in salivary, urinary, and intestinal tissues of deer: potential mechanisms of prion shedding and transmission. J. Virol. 2011;85:6309–6318. doi: 10.1128/JVI.00425-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Bucalossi C, et al. Assessment of the genetic susceptibility of sheep to scrapie by protein misfolding cyclic amplification and comparison with experimental scrapie transmission studies. J. Virol. 2011;85:8386–8392. doi: 10.1128/JVI.00241-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Yokoyama T, et al. Heparin enhances the cell-protein misfolding cyclic amplification efficiency of variant Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease. Neroscience Lett. 2011;498:119–123. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2011.04.072. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Ayers JL, et al. The strain-encoded relationship between PrP replication, stability and processing in neurons is predictive of the incubation period of disease. PLOS Pathog. 2011;7:e1001317. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1001317. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Murayama Y, et al. Sulfated dextrans enhance in vitro amplification of bovine spongiform encephalopathy PrP(Sc) and enable ultrasensitive detection of bovine PrP(Sc). Plos ONE. 2010;5:e13152. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0013152. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Tattum MH, Jones S, Pal S, Collinge J, Jackson GS. Discrimination between prion-infected and normal blood samples by protein misfolding cyclic amplification. Transfusion. 2010;50:2619–2627. doi: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2010.02595.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Rubenstein R, et al. Prion disease detection, PMCA kinetics, and IgG in urine from sheep naturally/experimentally infected with scrapie and deer with preclinical/clinical chronic wasting disease. J. Virol. 2011;85:9031–9038. doi: 10.1128/JVI.05111-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Nishina K, et al. The Stoichiometry of Host PrPC Glycoforms Modulates the Efficiency of PrPSc formation in vitro. Biochemistry. 2006;45:14129–14139. doi: 10.1021/bi061526k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Gonzalez-Montalban N, Makarava N, Savtchenko R, Baskakov IV. Relationship between Conformational Stability and Amplification Efficiency of Prions. Biochemistry. 2011;50:7933–7940. doi: 10.1021/bi200950v. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Castilla J, et al. Crossing the Species Barrier by PrPSc Replication In Vitro Generates Unique Infectious Prions. Cell. 2008;134:757–768. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2008.07.030. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Green KM, et al. Accelerated High Fidelity Prion Amplification Within and Across Prion Species Barriers. PLOS Pathog. 2008;4:e1000139. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1000139. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Gonzalez-Montalban N, et al. Highly Efficient Protein Misfolding Cyclic Amplification. PLoS Pathogen. 2011;7:e1001277. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1001277. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Pritzkow S, et al. Quantitative detection and biological propagation of scrapie seeding activity in vitro facilitate use of prions as model pathogens for disinfection. Plos ONE. 2011;6:e20384. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0020384. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Makarava N, et al. Recombinant prion protein induces a new transmissible prion disease in wild type animals. Acta Neuropathol. 2010;119:177–187. doi: 10.1007/s00401-009-0633-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Bocharova OV, Breydo L, Parfenov AS, Salnikov VV, Baskakov IV. In vitro conversion of full length mammalian prion protein produces amyloid form with physical property of PrPSc. J. Mol. Biol. 2005;346:645–659. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2004.11.068. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Bocharova OV, et al. Annealing PrP amyloid firbils at high temperature results in extension of a proteinase K resistant core. J. Biol. Chem. 2006;281:2373–2379. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M510840200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Sun Y, et al. Conformational stability of PrP amyloid firbils controls their smallest possible fragment size. J. Mol. Biol. 2008;376:1155–1167. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2007.12.053. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Makarava N, Baskakov IV. The same primary structure of the prion protein yields two distinct self-propagating states. J. Biol. Chem. 2008;283:15988–15996. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M800562200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Klingeborn M, Race B, Meade-White KD, Chesebro B. Lower specific infectivity of protease-resistant prion protein generated in cell-free reactions. Proc. Acad. Natl. Sci. U. S. A. 2011;108:1244–1253. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1111255108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Shikiya AS, Bartz JC. In vitro generation of high titer prions. J. Virol. 2011;85:13439–13442. doi: 10.1128/JVI.06134-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Miller MB, Geoghegan JC, Supattapone S. Dissociation of infectivity from seeding ability in prions with alternate docking mechanism. PLoS Pathogen. 2011;7:e1002128. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1002128. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Safar J, et al. Prion clearance in bigenic mice. J. Gen. Virol. 2005;86:2913–2923. doi: 10.1099/vir.0.80947-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Sandberg MK, Al-Doujaily H, Sharps B, Clarke AR, Collinge J. Prion propagation and toxicity in vitro occur in two distinct mechanistic phases. Nature. 2011;470:540–542. doi: 10.1038/nature09768. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Gregori L, et al. Reduction of transmissible spongiform encephalopathy infectivity from human red blood cells with prion protein affinity ligands. Transfusion. 2006;46:1152–1161. doi: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2006.00865.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES