Abstract
Background
Gender differences in the relationship between alcohol use and depressive symptoms are inconsistent, and few studies have addressed this issue in Russia. Because this finding may have important implications for interventions to reduce alcohol misuse or alcohol related problems in Russia, we conducted a study to investigate whether the association between alcohol use and depressive symptoms differs by gender at high risk for HIV.
Methods
We used the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT) and the 10-item Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale to measure alcohol use and depressive symptoms among 307 patients who attended a clinic for sexually transmitted infections in St. Petersburg, Russia. Logistic regression models were applied for the analysis.
Results
The comparison of data between men and women revealed a significant quadratic term of alcohol use and significant interactions between alcohol use and gender on depressive symptoms. Men with an AUDIT score in the first and fourth quartiles were more likely to report depressive symptoms in comparison to men in the second quartile. Their odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were 7.54 (2.00–28.51) and 5.06 (1.31–19.63), respectively. Among women, a linear trend was observed such that those who misused alcohol were three times more likely to have depressive symptoms than those who did not misuse alcohol (OR = 3.03, 95% CI, 1.05–8.80).
Conclusion
The association between alcohol use and depressive symptoms differed by gender. Additional research is needed to investigate this relationship in Russia. Strategies to reduce alcohol-related problems in Russia may need to consider these differences.
Keywords: alcohol, depression, depressive symptoms, gender differences, Russia
Introduction
Studies outside Russia have demonstrated that the association between alcohol problems and depression is well established [1–5]. Several possible explanations for this relationship have been proposed [2, 6, 7]. First, both alcohol problems and depression might share common environmental or genetic causes [8]. Second, alcohol problems may affect the development of depression through metabolic changes (e.g., alcohol problems reduce foliate metabolism, which is linked to an increased risk of depression) or through the negative effects that alcoholism has on a drinker’s social, economic and legal circumstances (e.g., partner-relationship disruptions) [2, 9]. Third, because people with depression are more likely to drink alcohol to cope with negative feelings, depression might lead to alcohol problems [10]. Finally, although there appear to be more studies that support an alcoholism to depression pathway [2], there is also evidence that this association may be bidirectional; that is, both disorders simultaneously increase the risk of the other [11].
Moreover, studies in the U.S. have shown that both alcohol use and depression may differ by gender [12–16]. In general, men tend to consume more alcohol than women, and women are more likely to have depression than men [15, 16]. However, results from studies that have examined the association between alcohol use and depression by gender also show mixed and inconclusive results [17–20]. For example, one cross-sectional study observed a non-linear U-shaped relationship for men but a linear trend for women [17]. In this study, the mean HADS (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale) scores for depression were 4.4, 2.9, 2.6 and 5.6 for men who were non-drinker, moderate, hazardous, and harmful drinkers, respectively, suggesting a non-linear U-shaped relationship for men [17]. Another study observed a non-linear relationship among women [21], and a third study found a non-linear relationship among both men and women [7]. To our knowledge, no study in Russia has examined the existence of gender differences in the relationship between alcohol use and depression, particularly in men and women at high risk for HIV [1, 22]. A clarification of the relationship between alcohol use and depression may provide important information for interventions aimed at reducing alcohol use or alcohol related health risks.
To address these questions, we conducted a study to investigate whether the association between alcohol use and depressive symptoms differed by gender and whether a U-shaped relationship was present among 307 participants who visited a STI (sexually transmitted infection) clinic center and were enrolled in a randomized intervention trial in St. Petersburg, Russia between July 2009 and November 2010. This special group was selected because both alcohol use and depression have been linked to HIV-related behaviors and few studies have examined the association between alcohol use and depression in HIV high risk groups [23].
Materials and Methods
Participants and procedures
Four hundred seventy patients who visited a public clinic for STIs in St. Petersburg, Russia were screened for participation in a behavior intervention study. The institutional review boards of the Biomedical Center in St. Petersburg, Russia and Yale University in Connecticut, United States approved this study. An invitation was extended to the 338 adults who met the inclusion criteria of having multiple sexual partners or at least one casual partner three months prior to the interview. These potential participants were informed of the purpose of the study and were assured that the study was confidential and voluntary. Thirty-one patients refused to participate. Three hundred seven patients provided written informed consent and completed a baseline assessment between July 2009 and November 2010. We used the baseline data before intervention for the present analysis.
A self-administered questionnaire collected data on demographics, alcohol use, drug use, sexual risk behaviors, and psychological factors. The demographics consisted of age, sex, marital status, education level, employment status, and monthly income. The Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT) which includes 10 questions with a total score that ranges from 0 to 40 was used to measure alcohol use [24]. A score of 8 or higher is usually indicative of hazardous drinking [24]. The Cronbach’s α for the AUDIT is 0.85 in the current sample.
The ten-item Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale (CES-D-10), which is a shorter version of the 20-item CES-D that is widely used to screen for depression [25, 26], identified depressive symptoms. Each item on the CES-D-10 has four 4-point response options that range from 0 to 3. Thus, the total CES-D-10 score ranges from 0 to 30. A score of 10 or more is usually used as the cut-off value for depressive symptoms. The CES-D-10 has demonstrated good predictive accuracy when screening for depression in comparison to its full version [25]. The Cronbach’s α for the CES-D-10 is 0.84 in the current sample.
Statistical analyses
Chi-square tests were used to examine whether the characteristics differed by gender. Fisher’s exact test was used to compare these variables when the Chi-square test was inappropriate (i.e., in cases of small expected frequencies). A graph was plotted to preliminarily examine the effect of alcohol use on depressive symptoms by dividing the AUDIT score into quartiles and calculating the prevalence of depressive symptoms at each quartile. The quartiles were separately calculated for men and women because men and women might have different drinking patterns. The Mantel-Haenszel Chi-square test was used to preliminarily examine whether there was a linear relationship between the quartiles of alcohol use and depressive symptoms.
Multivariate logistic regression was used to examine the relationship between alcohol use and depressive symptoms. Higher order terms of continuous AUDIT scores and interaction terms between AUDIT scores and gender on depressive symptoms were included in the models to test whether there was a U-shaped relationship and whether the relationship differed by gender. If a significant interaction effect was observed, separate multivariate logistic regressions were used to determine whether alcohol use was associated with depressive symptoms for men and women. For the purpose of interpretation of the study results, AUDIT quartiles were used in the final model when a U-shaped relationship was observed, and dichotomized AUDIT (alcohol misuse vs. non-misuse) was used when a linear relationship was observed. The significance level was set at p < 0.05 and the data were analyzed using SAS 9.1 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC).
Results
Of the 307 participants, 220 were men and 87 were women (Table 1). Men were less likely to be married and to have monthly income < 15,000 rubles (about 530 U.S. dollars) in comparison to women. No significant gender differences were observed for age, education, employment status, history of STIs, ever being a commercial sex worker, and intravenous drug use.
Table 1.
Characteristics | Men (n = 220) | Women (n = 87) | p-value a |
---|---|---|---|
Age (25 years or less) | 56.8% | 48.3% | 0.18 |
Being married | 16.8% | 31.0% | 0.006 |
Some higher education | 48.6% | 55.2% | 0.30 |
Monthly income < 15,000 rubles | 32.3% | 69.0% | <0.0001 |
Unemployed | 40.0% | 47.1% | 0.25 |
Ever had an STI b | 34.1% | 39.1% | 0.41 |
Number of sexual partner, past 3 months | 0.02 | ||
1 | 24.1% | 36.8% | |
2 | 29.1% | 33.3% | |
3 or more | 46.8% | 29.9% | |
Commercial sex workers | 4.1% | 2.3% | 0.73 c |
Intravenous drug use | 4.5% | 1.1% | 0.19 c |
Alcohol misuse identified by AUDIT score d | 84.1% | 44.8% | <0.0001 |
Depressive symptoms e | 17.3% | 27.6% | 0.04 |
Obtained from the Chi-squared test without additional notes.
STI: sexually transmitted infection.
Obtained from Fisher’s exact test.
AUDIT: the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test; scores ≥8 indicate alcohol misuse.
Identified by the CES-D-10: Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale. The mean and median CES-D-10 scores were 6.1 and 5.0, respectively; CES-D-10 scores ≥ 10 indicate depressive symptoms.
The mean (median) AUDIT scores for men and women were 13.4 (13.0) and 9.0 (7.0), respectively, and men were nearly twice as likely as women to misuse alcohol (84.1% of men vs. 44.8% of women, p < 0.0001). The mean (median) CES-D-10 scores for men and women were 5.7 (5.0) and 6.9 (6.0), respectively, and men were less likely to have depressive symptoms in comparison to women (17.3% of men vs. 27.6% of women, p = 0.04).
The prevalence rates of depressive symptoms were 28.6%, 5.2%, 10.9% and 25.5% across the 1st to 4th quartiles of alcohol use in men, respectively (Figure 1). The Mantel-Haenszel linear trend test on these data was not significant (p = 0.82). The prevalence rates of depressive symptoms were 12.0%, 21.7%, 40.0% and 42.1% across the 1st to 4th quartiles of alcohol use in women, respectively. The Mantel-Haenszel linear trend test on these data, however, was significant (p = 0.01).
In the model with men and women included, the regression coefficients for the interaction between the first-order AUDIT score and gender (p = 0.001) and the interaction between quadratic term of AUDIT score and gender (p = 0.004) were significant. Stratification analysis was then conducted by gender.
To facilitate the interpretation of the results, we replaced the continuous AUDIT score with quartile levels of AUDIT score (Table 2). The model revealed that men in the 1st and 4th alcohol use quartiles were more likely to have depressive symptoms in comparison to those in the 2nd quartile (odds ratio [OR; and 95% CIs] for the 1st quartile: 7.54 [2.00–28.51]; for the 4th quartile: 5.06 [1.31–19.63]) after controlling for significant covariates, such as employment status, as well as histories of STIs and intravenous drug use. There were no significant differences between the 2nd and 3rd alcohol use quartiles.
Table 2.
Characteristics | Men (n = 220)
|
Women (n = 87)
|
||
---|---|---|---|---|
Unadjusted OR | Adjusted OR | Unadjusted OR | Adjusted OR | |
Age (25 years or less) | 0.93 (0.46–1.87) | — | 1.39 (0.54–3.56) | — |
Being married | 0.91 (0.35–2.37) | — | 0.89 (0.32–2.47) | — |
Some higher education | 0.49 (0.23–1.01) | — | 0.95 (0.37–2.43) | — |
Monthly income < 15,000 rubles | 1.92 (0.94–3.92) | — | 1.50 (0.52–4.34) | — |
Unemployed | 2.12 (1.05–4.30) | 2.42 (1.12–5.26) | 1.17 (0.46–3.01) | — |
Ever had an STI a | 2.25 (1.11–4.57) | 2.47 (1.14–5.34) | 1.16 (0.45–3.02) | — |
Number of sexual partner in the past 3 months | ||||
1 | Reference | — | Reference | Reference |
2 | 0.79 (0.32–1.94) | — | 5.91 (1.45–24.09) | 5.73 (1.36–24.06) |
3 or more | 0.54 (0.23–1.26) | — | 6.04 (1.45–25.18) | 4.46 (1.03–19.41) |
Commercial sex workers b | 1.39 (0.28–6.96) | — | — | — |
Intravenous drug use b | 3.45 (0.92–12.88) | 4.66 (1.11–19.54) | — | — |
Alcohol use c | 3.48 (1.29–9.38) | 3.03 (1.05–8.80) | ||
1st quartile | 7.33 (2.00–26.87) | 7.54 (2.00–28.51) | — | — |
2nd quartile | Reference | Reference | — | — |
3rd quartile | 2.25 (0.53–9.46) | 2.32 (0.53–10.10) | — | — |
4th quartile | 6.27 (1.67–23.52) | 5.06 (1.31–19.63) | — | — |
STI: sexually transmitted infections
Commercial sex worker and injection drug use were not included in the estimation among women due to small numbers.
Alcohol use was identified by using the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT). Since a significant linear trend was observed for women, we presented alcohol use as alcohol misuse vs. non-misuse for women (a score ≥ 8 indicates alcohol misuse).
Given the linear trend between continuous AUDIT score and depressive symptoms among women, a multivariate analysis directly investigated this relationship using alcohol misuse in place of continuous AUDIT score in order to obtain more intuitive results. In the multivariate analysis, women who misused alcohol were 3.03 times more likely to have depressive symptoms in comparison to those who did not misuse alcohol (95% CI = 1.05–8.80) after controlling for the number of sexual partners that these women had in the past three months (a significant covariate).
Discussion
The present study found a significant association between alcohol use and depressive symptoms, and this association differed by gender. Specifically, a non-linear, U-shaped relationship was present among men, whereas a linear trend was observed among women. To the best of our knowledge, this study is the first to specifically examine the existence of a non-linear relationship and gender differences between alcohol use and depressive symptoms in Russia.
The U-shaped relationship that was observed in the present study suggests that men who had higher AUDIT scores were associated with fewer depressive symptoms up to a point; above this threshold, men who had higher AUDIT scores were associated with more depressive symptoms. Although this U-shaped relationship has also been observed in previous studies, the mechanisms remain unclear [7, 17, 27–29]. The two sides of the curve might have different underlying mechanisms [29]. First, it is possible that alcohol misuse may lead to depressive symptoms on the right side of the curve (moderate to heavy drinking), whereas alcohol use might have a protective effect on the left side of the curve (light to moderate drinking) [28]. Second, it is possible that depressive symptoms might lead to either abstinence or the heavy use of alcohol [7]. For example, some people with depressive symptoms might cope with these symptoms with heavy alcohol use, whereas others might activate a self-evaluation process that motivates them to reduce their alcohol use [2, 30]. It is also possible that people who use alcohol at both ends of the curve might share common risk factors for depression (e.g., unemployment and social isolation). For example, unemployment might cause either heavy drinking due to increased stress or abstinence due to financial hardship [31, 32]. Although we controlled for important potential confounders in the association between alcohol use and depressive symptoms, we missed others, such as economic or employment related stresses among those who were employed [33–35]. Future studies might need to elucidate the potential mechanisms that may affect the association between alcohol and depression.
Contrary to the studies that have observed a U-shaped relationship among both men and women [7], the present study observed a linear trend among women, which suggests that more alcohol use is associated with a greater likelihood of depressive symptoms. One previous study reported similar gender differences [17]. This gender difference indicates that the relationship between alcohol use and depressive symptoms is different for men and women. Recent evidence also suggests that women who consume alcohol develop depressive symptoms faster than men [2]. Our results suggest that there is a need for additional longitudinal studies to investigate and confirm the gender differences in the relationship between alcohol use and depression in Russia. Prevention programs to reduce the negative consequences of alcohol use might benefit from considering these differences.
The results from the present study should be interpreted in the context of several limitations. First, although the CES-D-10 scale is widely used to screen for depression, it is not a clinical evaluation. Furthermore, although the CES-D has been used and validated in many countries, including Russia [36, 37], the validity of the CES-D-10 has not been examined in Russia. Second, the participants (STI patients) were highly selective; thus, these findings should not be generalized to other populations such as non-clinic samples. Third, the different patterns of alcohol use and depression in the men and women might simply be due to different motivations for alcohol use. For example, it is possible that the more women self-medicate with alcohol the more depressed they become, thus generating a linear positive slope [38]. Men’s depression on the other hand might be situationally brought on by the drinking. For example, in Russia, abstainers might be depressed because they feel excluded from men’s peer groups [39]; those who are excessive drinkers may be unable to function in the economy and family life – making them depressed [32, 34]. We did not collect drinking motivation in the present study and thus we could not exclude these possibilities.
In summary, the present study demonstrated a non-linear U-shaped relationship between alcohol use and depressive symptoms among men and a linear trend among women. Additional research is needed to investigate relationships among alcohol use, depressive symptoms, gender differences, and other alcohol related risk factors in Russia. Preventive strategies for reduction of alcohol-related problems in Russia should consider these differences.
Acknowledgments
This work was funded by Grant Number R01AA017389 from the National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (PI: N. Abdala).
Abbreviations
- AUDIT
Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test
- CES-D
Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale
- CI
Confidence interval
- OR
Odds ratio
- STI
Sexually transmitted infection
Footnotes
Declaration of interest
None declared.
All authors had no any possible conflicts of interests.
References
- 1.Bobak M, Pikhart H, Pajak A, Kubinova R, Malyutina S, Sebakova H, et al. Depressive symptoms in urban population samples in Russia, Poland and the Czech Republic. Br J Psychiatry. 2006;188:359–365. doi: 10.1192/bjp.188.4.359. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Boden JM, Fergusson DM. Alcohol and depression. Addiction. 2011;106(5):906–914. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2010.03351.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Fergusson DM, Boden JM, Horwood LJ. Tests of causal links between alcohol abuse or dependence and major depression. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2009;66(3):260–266. doi: 10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2008.543. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Hasin DS, Grant BF. Major depression in 6050 former drinkers: association with past alcohol dependence. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2002;59(9):794–800. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.59.9.794. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Nunes EV, Levin FR. Treatment of depression in patients with alcohol or other drug dependence: a meta-analysis. JAMA. 2004;291(15):1887–1896. doi: 10.1001/jama.291.15.1887. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Conner KR, Pinquart M, Gamble SA. Meta-analysis of depression and substance use among individuals with alcohol use disorders. J Subst Abuse Treat. 2009;37(2):127–137. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2008.11.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Rodgers B, Korten AE, Jorm AF, Jacomb PA, Christensen H, Henderson AS. Non-linear relationships in associations of depression and anxiety with alcohol use. Psychol Med. 2000;30(2):421–432. doi: 10.1017/s0033291799001865. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Tambs K, Harris JR, Magnus P. Genetic and environmental contributions to the correlation between alcohol consumption and symptoms of anxiety and depression. Results from a bivariate analysis of Norwegian twin data. Behav Genet. 1997;27(3):241–250. doi: 10.1023/a:1025662114352. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.McEachin RC, Keller BJ, Saunders EF, McInnis MG. Modeling gene-by-environment interaction in comorbid depression with alcohol use disorders via an integrated bioinformatics approach. BioData Min. 2008;1(1):2. doi: 10.1186/1756-0381-1-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Schuckit MA, Smith TL, Chacko Y. Evaluation of a depression-related model of alcohol problems in 430 probands from the San Diego prospective study. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2006;82(3):194–203. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2005.09.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Flensborg-Madsen T, Mortensen EL, Knop J, Becker U, Sher L, Gronbaek M. Comorbidity and temporal ordering of alcohol use disorders and other psychiatric disorders: results from a Danish register-based study. Compr Psychiatry. 2009;50(4):307–314. doi: 10.1016/j.comppsych.2008.09.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Bobrova N, West R, Malyutina D, Malyutina S, Bobak M. Gender differences in drinking practices in middle aged and older Russians. Alcohol Alcohol. 2010;45(6):573–580. doi: 10.1093/alcalc/agq069. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Ehlers CL, Gizer IR, Vieten C, Gilder A, Gilder DA, Stouffer GM, et al. Age at regular drinking, clinical course, and heritability of alcohol dependence in the San Francisco family study: a gender analysis. Am J Addict. 2010;19(2):101–110. doi: 10.1111/j.1521-0391.2009.00021.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Gupta R, Dandu M, Packel L, Rutherford G, Leiter K, Phaladze N, et al. Depression and HIV in Botswana: a population-based study on gender-specific socioeconomic and behavioral correlates. PLoS One. 2010;5(12):e14252. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0014252. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Hyde JS, Mezulis AH, Abramson LY. The ABCs of depression: integrating affective, biological, and cognitive models to explain the emergence of the gender difference in depression. Psychol Rev. 2008;115(2):291–313. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.115.2.291. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Wilsnack RW, Vogeltanz ND, Wilsnack SC, Harris TR, Ahlstrom S, Bondy S, et al. Gender differences in alcohol consumption and adverse drinking consequences: cross- cultural patterns. Addiction. 2000;95(2):251–265. doi: 10.1046/j.1360-0443.2000.95225112.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Alati R, Kinner S, Najman JM, Fowler G, Watt K, Green D. Gender differences in the relationships between alcohol, tobacco and mental health in patients attending an emergency department. Alcohol Alcohol. 2004;39(5):463–469. doi: 10.1093/alcalc/agh080. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Choi NG, Dinitto DM. Heavy/binge drinking and depressive symptoms in older adults: gender differences. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2010 doi: 10.1002/gps.2616. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Moscato BS, Russell M, Zielezny M, Bromet E, Egri G, Mudar P, et al. Gender differences in the relation between depressive symptoms and alcohol problems: a longitudinal perspective. Am J Epidemiol. 1997;146(11):966–974. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a009224. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Skaff MM, Finney JW, Moos RH. Gender differences in problem drinking and depression: different “vulnerabilities?”. Am J Community Psychol. 1999;27(1):25–54. doi: 10.1023/A:1022813727823. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Alati R, Lawlor DA, Najman JM, Williams GM, Bor W, O’Callaghan M. Is there really a ‘J-shaped’ curve in the association between alcohol consumption and symptoms of depression and anxiety? Findings from the Mater-University Study of Pregnancy and its outcomes. Addiction. 2005;100(5):643–651. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2005.01063.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Averina M, Nilssen O, Brenn T, Brox J, Arkhipovsky VL, Kalinin AG. Social and lifestyle determinants of depression, anxiety, sleeping disorders and self-evaluated quality of life in Russia--a population-based study in Arkhangelsk. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2005;40(7):511–518. doi: 10.1007/s00127-005-0918-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Sullivan LE, Saitz R, Cheng DM, Libman H, Nunes D, Samet JH. The impact of alcohol use on depressive symptoms in human immunodeficiency virus-infected patients. Addiction. 2008;103(9):1461–7. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2008.02245.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Babor TF, Higgins-Biddle JC, Saunders JB, Monteiro MG. AUDIT: The Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test: Guidelines for Use in Primary Care: Department of Mental Health and Substance Dependence. World Health Organization; CH-1211 Geneva 27, Switzerland: 2001. [Google Scholar]
- 25.Andresen EM, Malmgren JA, Carter WB, Patrick DL. Screening for depression in well older adults: evaluation of a short form of the CES-D (Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale) Am J Prev Med. 1994;10(2):77–84. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Radloff LS. The CES-D scale: A self-report depression scale for research in the general population. Appl Psychological Measurement. 1977;1:385–401. [Google Scholar]
- 27.Lipton RI. The effect of moderate alcohol use on the relationship between stress and depression. Am J Public Health. 1994;84(12):1913–1917. doi: 10.2105/ajph.84.12.1913. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Power C, Rodgers B, Hope S. U-shaped relation for alcohol consumption and health in early adulthood and implications for mortality. Lancet. 1998;352(9131):877. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(98)23937-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Skogen JC, Harvey SB, Henderson M, Stordal E, Mykletun A. Anxiety and depression among abstainers and low-level alcohol consumers. The Nord-Trondelag Health Study Addiction. 2009;104(9):1519–1529. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2009.02659.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Schutte KK, Hearst J, Moos RH. Gender differences in the relations between depressive symptoms and drinking behavior among problem drinkers: a three-wave study. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1997;65(3):392–404. doi: 10.1037//0022-006x.65.3.392. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Koposov RA, Ruchkin VV, Eisemann M, Sidorov PI. Alcohol use in adolescents from northern Russia: the role of the social context. Alcohol and alcoholism. 2002;37(3):297–303. doi: 10.1093/alcalc/37.3.297. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Perlman FJ. Drinking in transition: trends in alcohol consumption in Russia 1994–2004. BMC public health. 2010;10:691. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-10-691. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Bobak M, Pikhart H, Kubinova R, Malyutina S, Pajak A, Sebakova H, et al. The association between psychosocial characteristics at work and problem drinking: a cross-sectional study of men in three Eastern European urban populations. Occupational and environmental medicine. 2005;62(8):546–50. doi: 10.1136/oem.2004.017202. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Jukkala T, Makinen IH, Kislitsyna O, Ferlander S, Vagero D. Economic strain, social relations, gender, and binge drinking in Moscow. Social science & medicine. 2008;66(3):663–74. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2007.10.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Tomkins S, Saburova L, Kiryanov N, Andreev E, McKee M, Shkolnikov V, et al. Prevalence and socio-economic distribution of hazardous patterns of alcohol drinking: study of alcohol consumption in men aged 25–54 years in Izhevsk, Russia. Addiction. 2007;102(4):544–53. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2006.01693.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Andriushchenko AV, Drobizhev MI, Dobrovol’skii AV. A comparative validation of the scale CES-D, BDI, and HADS(d) in diagnosis of depressive disorders in general practice. Zh Nevrol Psikhiatr Im SS Korsakova. 2003;103(5):11–18. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Dershem LD, Patsiorkovski VV, O’Brien DJ. The Use of the CES- D for Measuring Symptoms of Depression in Three Rural Russian Villages. Social Indicators Research. 1996;39:1–20. [Google Scholar]
- 38.Grant BF, Harford TC. Comorbidity between DSM-IV alcohol use disorders and major depression: results of a national survey. Drug and alcohol dependence. 1995;39(3):197–206. doi: 10.1016/0376-8716(95)01160-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Saburova L, Keenan K, Bobrova N, Leon DA, Elbourne D. Alcohol and fatal life trajectories in Russia: understanding narrative accounts of premature male death in the family. BMC public health. 2011;11:481. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-11-481. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]