Abstract
Purpose
To investigate the incidence, mechanisms, characteristics, and visual outcomes of traumatic wound dehiscence following keratoplasty.
Methods
Medical records of 32 consecutive patients with traumatic globe rupture following keratoplasty who had been treated at our center from 2001 to 2009 were retrospectively reviewed.
Results
The study population consisted of 32 eyes of 32 patients including 25 men and 7 women with history of corneal transplantation who had sustained eye trauma leading to globe rupture. Mean patient age was 38.1 (range, 8 to 87) years and median interval between keratoplasty and the traumatic event was 9 months (range, 30 days to 20 years). Associated anterior segment findings included iris prolapse in 71.9%, lens extrusion in 34.4%, and hyphema in 40.6% of eyes. Posterior segment complications included vitreous prolapse (56%), vitreous hemorrhage (28%) and retinal detachment (18%). Eyes which had undergone deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty (DALK; 5 cases, 15.6%) tended to have less severe presentation and better final visual acuity. There was no correlation between the time interval from keratoplasty to the traumatic event, and final visual outcomes.
Conclusion
The host-graft interface demonstrates decreased stability long after surgery and the visual prognosis of traumatic wound dehiscence is poor in many cases. An intact Descemet’s membrane in DALK may mitigate the severity of ocular injuries, but even in these cases, the visual outcome of globe rupture is not good and prevention of ocular trauma should be emphasized to all patients undergoing any kind of keratoplasty.
Keywords: Corneal Transplantation, Complications, Surgical Wound Dehiscence
INTRODUCTION
Globe rupture may occur in any eye that sustains trauma and tends to occur at the weakest points. Keratoplasty exposes patients to a higher risk of globe rupture following trauma because the surgical wound may never regain the strength and stability of an intact cornea.1-3
These eyes can be severely injured by only minor insult, which may result in globe rupture at the host-graft junction.4 Multiple factors have been proposed to be associated with weak host-graft junctions, such as inappropriate wound apposition, avascularity of the interface, prolonged treatment with topical steroids, and suture complications.5
In this study we evaluated the mechanisms, incidence, characteristics and visual outcomes of traumatic globe rupture following keratoplasty.
Methods
This retrospective study includes 32 eyes of 32 patients who sustained ocular trauma following keratoplasty from 2001 to 2009. During this period, 1,083 eyes had undergone keratoplasty at our center. Records of all patients were reviewed and those with globe rupture were selected. Cases with inadequate follow-up were excluded from the study. Records were reviewed in terms of describing the injury and therapeutic measurements. After appropriate management in the emergency room, all cases were referred to the operation room for secondary repair. In all cases, the ruptured wound was sutured with 10-0 nylon and if needed, anterior vitrectomy and iris repositioning was performed. The mean duration of follow up after repair was 23 (range, 2 to 98) months.
Results
Thirty-two eyes of 32 patients that had sustained ocular trauma following keratoplasty were studied. Indications for corneal transplantation included pseudophakic bullous keratopathy (PBK) in 7 cases, keratoconus in 18, herpetic corneal opacity in two cases, one case of congenital hereditary endothelial dystrophy (CHED), two cases of macular corneal dystrophy, one case of corneal melting due to herpes simplex keratitis, and one case of old corneal opacity due to corneal laceration repair. The type of keratoplasty was penetrating keratoplasty (PKP) in 26 eyes (81.3%), deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty (DALK) in 5 eyes (15.6%), and tectonic graft in one eye (3.1%).
Mean age at the time of trauma was 38.1±18.7 (range, 8 to 87) years and mean interval between keratoplasty and traumatic wound dehiscence was 44.1 months (range, 1-350). Dehiscence occurred during the first 3 years following operation in 24 cases (75%) which included 13 cases (40.6%) in the first year, 4 cases in the second (12.5%) and 7 cases (21.8%) in the third.
All patients included herein had sustained blunt ocular trauma and none had worn protective eyewear following keratoplasty. The cause of trauma included being hit accidentally in 13 cases, intentional assault in 10, minor trauma such as finger pokes in 3 cases, and falling either due to loss of consciousness or accidents in 6 cases (Table 1).
Table 1.
Characteristics of traumatic wound dehiscence following keratoplasty
| Case | Indication for keratoplasty | Typeof keratoplasty | Age at time of trauma | Causeof trauma | Interval between trauma and keratoplasty (months) | Final visual acuity |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | PBK | PKP | 51 | Fall | 80 | CF 2m |
| 2 | PBK | PKP | 52 | Fall | 15 | HM |
| 3 | Keratoconus | PKP | 25 | Fingerpoke | 5 | CF 2m |
| 4 | PBK | PKP | 65 | Fall | 3 | LP |
| 5 | Keratoconus | DALK | 26 | Punch | 11 | 3/10 |
| 6 | PBK | PKP | 80 | Fall | 36 | NLP |
| 7 | Keratoconus | PKP | 18 | Punch | 5 | 4/10 |
| 8 | Keratoconus | DALK | 28 | Struckby door | 15 | 3/10 |
| 9 | Macular corneal dystrophy | PBK | 12 | Struckby hand | 5 | 8/10 |
| 10 | Keratoconus | DALK | 36 | Struckby hand | 1 | 2/10 |
| 11 | Corneal melting due to herpetic keratitis | Tectonic graft | 51 | Punch | 36 | NLP |
| 12 | Keratoconus | PKP | 23 | Punch | 36 | CF 1m |
| 13 | Opacity due to corneal laceration repair | PKP | 14 | Struckby hand | 8 | CF 3m |
| 14 | Keratoconus | DALK | 40 | Struckby own hand | 4 | 2/10 |
| 15 | Keratoconus | PKP | 35 | Punch | 28 | HM |
| 16 | Keratoconus | DALK | 40 | Punch | 8 | HM |
| 17 | Old herpetic corneal opacity | PKP | 41 | Punch | 43 | HM |
| 18 | PBK | PKP | 78 | Struckby hand | 15 | CF 2m |
| 19 | Macular corneal dystrophy | PKP | 11 | Struckby hand | 26 | CF 2m |
| 20 | Keratoconus | PKP | 29 | Punch | 34 | HM |
| 21 | Keratoconus | DALK | 40 | Struckby hand | 14 | HM |
| 22 | Old herpetic corneal opacity | PKP | 47 | Struckby hand | 35 | HM |
| 23 | Keratoconus | PKP | 35 | Punch | 12 | NLP |
| 24 | CHED | PKP | 8 | Struckby door | 24 | CF 5 |
| 25 | PBK | PKP | 60 | Fall | 237 | CF20cm |
| 26 | Keratoconus | PKP | 41 | Fall | 240 | LP |
| 27 | Keratoconus | PKP | 25 | Fingerpoke | 24 | CF 1m |
| 28 | Keratoconus | PKP | 44 | Struckby car door | 240 | HM |
| 29 | PBK | PKP | 57 | Fingerpoke | 16 | 2/10 |
| 30 | Keratoconus | PKP | 46 | Punch | 110 | CF0.5m |
| 31 | Keratoconus | PKP | 30 | Struckby hand | 100 | NLP |
| 32 | Keratoconus | PKP | 28 | Struckby toy | 30 | CF 1m |
PBK, pseudophakic bullous keratopathy; CHED, congenital hereditary endothelial dystrophy; PKP, penetrating keratoplasty DALK, deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty; CF, counting fingers; HM, hand motion; LP, light perception NLP, no light perception
Traumatic globe rupture occurred at the host-graft junction in all cases. The suturing technique was interrupted in 21 cases and running in 11 cases. The extent of the wound dehiscence was one quarter in 16 cases (50%), two quarters in 13 cases (40.6%), and three quarters in 3 cases (9.4%). Wound dehiscence was more frequently located superiorly and inferotemporally (12 cases; 37.5%). The dehiscence was superonasal in 10 cases (31.3%), and superotemporal and inferonasal in 5 cases each (15.6%). In keratoconus cases, the location of wound dehiscence was inferotemporal in 8 cases (44.4%) and inferonasal in 4 (22.2%). The type of initial suturing had been combined in 14 cases and interrupted in 18.
Associated injuries included iris prolapse in 23 cases (71.9%), hyphema in 13 eyes (40.6%), lens expulsion in 11 eyes (34.4%), and flat anterior chambers in 7 subjects (21.9%). Posterior segment injuries, such as vitreous hemorrhage and retinal detachment, were observed in 15 eyes (46.8%). Six of the posterior segment injuries were cases of retinal detachment and all occurred within the first 7 months after trauma. All cases of retinal detachment underwent vitreoretinal surgery and anatomical results were satisfactory in 5 eyes. Three patients underwent vitreoretinal surgery because of persistent vitreous hemorrhage. One case underwent Ahmed glaucoma valve implantation because of poor intraocular pressure control, and endophthalmitis complicated one case 7 days after the traumatic event.
Final visual acuity (VA) was 1/10 or better in 7 (21.8%), better than hand motions to 1/10 in 11 (34.3%), hand motions or light perception in 10 (31.2%) and no light perception in 4 (12.5%) eyes. DALK patients were more likely to have better final visual acuity (P = 0.037) than PKP patients. In addition, they were less likely to experience iris prolapse (P = 0.020) or hyphema (P = 0.052), or require vitreoretinal surgery (P = 0.920). Although DALK patients had a smaller area of wound dehiscence as compared to PKP cases, the difference did not reach statistical significance (P = 0.601).
Discussion
Traumatic wound dehiscence following keratoplasty has been evaluated in many studies and associations between final visual acuity on one hand and age, sex, type of trauma, interval from keratoplasty to trauma, and indications for keratoplasty on the other have been investigated. Wound dehiscence following keratoplasty has an unfavorable prognosis5 and the burden of this problem has not been adequately determined in Iran.
The incidence of traumatic wound dehiscence following keratoplasty in this study was 2.9%. The incidence of rupture reported from other countries varies from 0.6% to 5.8%.5
Rehany and Rumelt6 reported traumatic wound dehiscence to be more common in younger individuals and also in those who had undergone keratoplasty for keratoconus. These two factors are inter-dependent since patients with keratoconus are younger than subjects with other keratoplasty indications. Foroutan et al7 also found greater susceptibility in younger subjects and reported keratoconus as the most common indication. In contrast to these studies, Tseng et al8 found greater susceptibility to ocular trauma in older patients. In our study, mean patient age at the time of trauma was 38.1 years and the most common indication for keratoplasty was keratoconus. This confirms young age and keratoconus as risk factors for wound dehiscence. In contrast to these findings, traumatic wound dehiscence was not associated with younger age or keratoconus in the studies by Tseng et al8 and Raber et al9.
Binder et al10 found no correlation between suturing technique and wound dehiscence. In our study, globe rupture was more frequent when sutures were placed in an interrupted fashion which is in good agreement with other studies that have found continuous sutures to be superior to interrupted sutures in preserving globe integrity; this is the reason why we observed less globe rupture with this technique in comparison to interrupted one.6,11
The mean interval between keratoplasty and traumatic wound dehiscence has varied from 18 weeks to 7.5 years in the literature.6,8,11-13 In our study, the mean interval between keratoplasty and traumatic wound dehiscence was 44.1 (range, 1 to 350) months and dehiscence frequently occurred during the first 3 years in the majority (75%) of cases. Wound dehiscence was more prevalent in the first and third years, which could be explained by the fact that at our center, sutures are removed 2 years after keratoplasty and the second peak of wound dehiscence in the third year may be due to weakened wound integrity after suture removal. Other series7,9,12 have demonstrated higher frequencies of wound dehiscence in the first two years following keratoplasty, but later occurrences have also been reported.8 The corneal wound never achieves its original strength, even years after keratoplasty.1 The higher prevalence of wound dehiscence in the early period after keratoplasty could be related to wound weakness, visual rehabilitation following keratoplasty and increased physical activity of the patient.6
Traumatic globe rupture following keratoplasty may lead to severe ocular complications including iris prolapse, extrusion of the crystalline lens (or intraocular lens), vitreous loss, and early or late retinal detachment.6,7,11,14 Anatomical complications in our study were as follows: iris prolapse in 23 cases (71.9%), hyphema in 13 (40.6%), lens expulsion in 11 cases (34.4%), and flat anterior chamber in 7 (21.9%). As in previously reported series,4,6,8,17 posterior segment injuries, such as retinal detachment and vitreous hemorrhage, were associated with poor prognosis and were an important cause of complete loss of vision in our study.
Patients who had undergone DALK tended to have better final visual acuity (P = 0.037) and also less extensive wound dehiscence although the difference with PKP was not statistically significant (60% of DALK eyes versus 50% of PKP cases had one quadrant of wound dehiscence). This may be due to better preserved corneal structure in DALK in comparison with PKP. Because younger patients have a more active lifestyle and are therefore more susceptible to ocular trauma, whenever possible, lamellar keratoplasty is the procedure of choice in this population, which in addition to decreased rate of rejection, offers better structural integrity.7 In older subjects who require keratoplasty for endothelial decompensation one can perform an endothelial graft which avoids post-PKP wound problems.15 In the case of PKP, new techniques such as the femtosecond laser technology are under evaluation for achieving a lamellar host-graft junction configuration which may offer a better wound profile.16,17
Most studies report poor visual outcomes for ocular trauma following keratoplasty.6-9 In the current study, 14 patients (43.7%) had final visual acuity of hand motions or less.
None of the patients in this case series wore protective glasses. Several authors have suggested using eye protection during the vulnerable period5,12, but as shown in this study, ocular trauma may occur during a large and variable time period after surgery, and it would be better to inform the patients of such complications and constantly remind them of such risks at each follow up visit.
Footnotes
Conflicts of Interest
None.
REFERENCES
- 1.Pettinelli DJ, Starr CE, Stark WJ. Late traumatic corneal wound dehiscence after penetrating keratoplasty. Arch Ophthalmol. 2005;123:853–856. doi: 10.1001/archopht.123.6.853. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Maheshwari S, Saswade M, Thool A. Traumatic wound dehiscence 14 years following penetrating keratoplasty. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2003;51:259–260. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Lee BL, Manche EE, Glasgow BJ. Rupture of radial and arcuate keratotomy scars by blunt trauma 91 months after incisional keratotomy. Am J Ophthalmol. 1995;120:108–110. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9394(14)73766-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Oshry T, Lifihitz T. Traumatic wound dehiscence after corneal graft. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers. 2001;32:470–473. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Lam FC, Rahman MQ, Ramaesh K. Traumatic wound dehiscence after penetrating keratoplasty-a cause for concern. Eye (Lond) 2007;21:1146–1150. doi: 10.1038/sj.eye.6702407. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Rehany U, Rumelt S. Ocular trauma following penetrating keratoplasty: incidence, outcome, and postoperative recommendations. Arch Ophthalmol. 1998;116:1282–1286. doi: 10.1001/archopht.116.10.1282. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Foroutan AR, Gheibi GH, Joshaghani M, Ahadian A, Foroutan P. Traumatic wound dehiscence and lens extrusion after penetrating keratoplasty. Cornea. 2009;28:1097–1099. doi: 10.1097/ICO.0b013e3181a1645e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Tseng SH, Lin SC, Chen FK. Traumatic wound dehiscence after penetrating keratoplasty: clinical features and outcome in 21 cases. Cornea. 1999;18:553–558. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Raber IM, Arentsen JJ, Laibson PR. Traumatic wound dehiscence after penetrating keratoplasty. Arch Ophthalmol. 1980;98:1407–1409. doi: 10.1001/archopht.1980.01020040259009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Binder PS, Abel R, Polack FM, Kaufman HE. Keratoplasty wound separations. Am J Ophthalmol. 1975;80:109–115. doi: 10.1016/0002-9394(75)90880-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Agrawal V, Wagh M, Krishnamachary M, Rao GN, Gupta S. Traumatic wound dehiscence after penetrating keratoplasty. Cornea. 1995;14:601–603. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Elder MJ, Stack RR. Globe rupture following penetrating keratoplasty: how often, why, and what can we do to prevent it? Cornea. 2004;23:776–780. doi: 10.1097/01.ico.0000133996.99520.c4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Gasset AR, Dohlman CH. The tensile strength of corneal wounds. Arch Ophthalmol. 1968;79:595–602. doi: 10.1001/archopht.1968.03850040597020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Bowman RJ, Yorston D, Aitchison TC, McIntyre B, Kirkness CM. Traumatic wound rupture after penetrating keratoplasty in Africa. Br J Ophthalmol. 1999;83:530–534. doi: 10.1136/bjo.83.5.530. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Price MO, Price FW. Descemet's stripping with endothelial keratoplasty: comparative outcomes with microkeratome-dissected and manually dissected donor tissue. Ophthalmology. 2006;113:1936–1942. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2006.05.034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Busin M. A new lamellar wound configuration for penetrating keratoplasty surgery. Arch Ophthalmol. 2003;121:260–265. doi: 10.1001/archopht.121.2.260. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Jeganathan SV, Ghosh S, Jhanji V, Lamoureux E, Taylor HR, Vajpayee RB. Resuturing following penetrating keratoplasty: a retrospective analysis. Br J Ophthalmol. 2008;92:893–895. doi: 10.1136/bjo.2007.133421. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]