Abstract
Prokaryotic ion channels have been valuable in providing structural models for understanding ion filtration and channel-gating mechanisms. However, their functional examinations have remained rare and usually been carried out by incorporating purified channel protein into artificial lipid membranes. Here we demonstrate the utilization of Escherichia coli to host the functional analyses by examining a putative cyclic nucleotide-gated K+ channel cloned from Magnetospirillum magnetotacticum, MmaK. When expressed in wild-type E. coli cells, MmaK renders the host sensitive to millimolar concentrations of externally applied K+, indicating MmaK forms a functional K+ conduit in the E. coli membrane in vivo. After enlarging these cells into giant spheroplasts, macro- and microscopic MmaK currents are readily detected in excised E. coli membrane patches by a patch clamp. We show that MmaK is indeed gated by submicromolar cAMP and ~10-fold higher concentration of cGMP and manifests as an inwardly rectified, K+-specific current with a 10.8 pS unitary conductance at −100 mV. Additionally, MmaK is inactivated by slightly acidic pH only from the cytoplasmic side. Our in vitro biophysical characterizations of MmaK correlate with its in vivo phenotype in E. coli, implicating its critical role as an intracellular cAMP and pH sensor for modulating bacterial membrane potential. Exemplified by MmaK functional studies, we establish that E. coli and its giant spheroplast provide a convenient and versatile system to express foreign channels for biophysical analyses that can be further dovetailed with microbial genetics.
Recent sequencing of bacterial genomes reveals that ion channels evolved as early as three billion years ago. K+ channels, for example, are widely spread in all life forms, Bacteria, Archaea, and Eukarya (1, 2). Because prokaryotic channel genes can often be heterologously expressed in Escherichia coli at high yield, the channel proteins so produced have laid an inroad to determine their crystal structures. Beginning with the prelude of MacKinnon and Doyle (3) crystal structures of these channels have raised our understanding of the molecular bases of ion channels as illustrated in several atomic structures of prokaryotic K+ channels (4–9).
Functional interpretation of prokaryotic channel structures by electrophysiological methods, however, has not been straightforward. The main technical barrier is that the prokaryotic channel activities are often difficult to analyze under the existing methodology. A common strategy has been reconstitution of the purified channel protein into artificial lipids for bilayer lipid membrane measurement (5, 10, 11), a process that relies on the chance survival of the channel during detergent extraction and lipid reconstitution. In some cases, the reconstituted channel activities can only be demonstrated with the low resolution 86Rb+ uptake assay (9, 12–14).
An often overlooked opportunity to capture these channels in action is the very membrane of the E. coli cells in which they are commonly overproduced. Although the rod of this bacterium (0.75-μm diameter, 2 μm in length) is about the dimension of a patch clamp pipette tip, there are genetic and pharmacological ways of generating giant E. coli some ten times its original size. In 1987, Martinac et al. (15) first described the enlargement of E. coli into giant spheroplast for direct patch clamp examination of the native mechanosensitive channels (16). Besides mechanosensitive channels, however, this pioneering method has seldom been extended to study the activities of other foreign channels. We have optimized the methods of functional preparation of giant E. coli spheroplast as well as patch clamp of the enlarged membrane to study MthK, the RCK (regulating the conductance of K+)-containing K+ channel from Methanobacterium thermoautotrophicum (5). The success in detecting the ensemble current of MthK in E. coli membrane led us to discover its hitherto unknown properties, including deactivation, desensitization, acidic inactivation, and Cd2+ activation (17). In this report, we illustrate the optimized method of giant spheroplast preparation and gigOhm seal formation in detail by functional expression and biophysical characterization of a bacterial cyclic nucleotide-gated K+ channel, MmaK2 from M. magnetotacticum. Related extension of microbial genetics to ion channel research is also discussed.
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
Molecular Biology and Phenotype Analysis
The mmaK gene (NCBI 46202428) from M. magnetotacticum (genomic DNA from Dr. B. Martinac, University of Queensland, Australia) was inserted into the pB13d vector between the NcoI and XhoI sites. An I2V mutation was made to create an NcoI site. The pB13d vector was created by replacing the LacUV5 promoter and the lacI gene of the pB11d vector with an E. coli genomic fragment containing araBAD promoter and the araC gene, corresponding to the DNA position of 70082–71319 of the E. coli K-12 genome. The plasmids were transformed into the TOP10 E. coli strain (F-, mcrA, Δ(mrr-hsdRMS-mcrBC), ϕ80lacZΔM15, ΔlacX74, deoR, nupG, recA1, araD139, Δ(ara-leu)7697, galU, galK rpsL(StrR), endA1, λ−, from Invitrogen) by electroporation and stored at −80 °C in the presence of 16% glycerol as a stock. Note that TOP10 has no deletions of the channels native to E. coli. We found it unnecessary to use mscL− mscS− bacteria for the expression of foreign channel. The presence of these mechanosensitive channels (15, 16) is in fact useful to help judge the quality of the patch (see below). For plasmid retention, 100 μg/ml ampicillin was added in all subsequent culture media. The phenotype assay was carried out following the protocol as previously described (18). Tryptone medium contain 10 g/liter of tryptone (211705; Bacto Tryptone), which has ~0.5 mM contaminating K+ (measured with a flame photometer).
Generation of Giant E. coli Spheroplast
To make giant spheroplasts, cells were streaked out from the −80 °C stock on a Luria Bertani-agar plate (10 g/liter tryptone, 5 g/liter yeast extract, 10 g/liter NaCl, and 1.5% agar) and grown overnight to reach colony sizes ~1–2 mm in diameter. A single colony was then inoculated in 5 ml of modified Luria Bertani medium (10 g/liter tryptone, 5 g/liter yeast extract, and 5 g/liter NaCl) in a 14-ml test tube and incubated aerobically by rotating at 250 rpm, 37 °C until A600 reached 0.3–0.5. At the desired A600, 0.5 ml of the exponentially growing culture was diluted 10-fold into 4.5 ml of prewarmed modified Luria Bertani medium supplemented with 60 μg/ml cephalexin (diluted from 10 mg/ml of sterile stock solution) (C4895; Sigma) to block the cell fission. After 2 h of incubation by rotation at 250 rpm, 37 °C, 0.001% L-arabinose (diluted from 1% sterile stock solution) was added to the culture to induce the expression of mmaK for 1.5–2 h. Unseptated filaments were harvested by spinning down 1–2 ml of the culture at 3,000 ×g in a 1.5-ml Eppendorf tube for 1 min. The snake pellet was then resuspended with 500 μl of 0.8 M sucrose by inverting the tube a few times. 30 μl of 1 M Tris-HCl, pH 8.0, 24 μl of 0.5 mg/ml lysozyme (~20 μg/ml final concentration (~600 units) (L6876; Sigma)) 6 μl of 5 mg/ml DNase (~50 μg/ml final concentration (D5025; Sigma)), and 6 μl of 125 mM EDTA-NaOH, pH 8.0 (~1.3 mM final concentration) were added in sequence and mixed immediately in between by inverting the tube a few times. After 5–10 min of incubation at room temperature, 100 μl of Stop Solution (10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0, 0.7 M sucrose, 20 mM MgCl2) was added to terminate digestion. The spheroplasts were directly used for patch clamping or frozen in aliquots at −80 °C and thawed in ice before later usage. We found that the amount of the lysozyme and EDTA described previously (15, 19) tends to produce transparent or grayish spheroplasts on which it is difficult to form gigOhm seals. Lowering the concentrations as described herein increases the consistency of the qualities of the giant spheroplasts in our applications.
Recording Set-up and Formation of gigOhm Seal
A calibrated glass pipette (100-μl; catalog number 2-000-100; Drummond Scientific Company, Broomall, PA) was pulled in two steps to a tip size ~4.5–5.0 bubble number (usually ~7–3 MΩ in the K150 solution) with a P-97 Micropipette Puller (Sutter Instrument Company, Novato, CA) and filled with a pipette solution (K150, pH 7.5, containing 10 mM Hepes-Tris, pH 7.5, 150 mM KCl, 20 mM CaCl2, and 500 mM sucrose), except for Fig. 6B, which was filled with a K150, pH 5.5, solution. The same solution was added to a patch clamp chamber (RC-22; Warner Instruments, Hamden, CT) together with 0.5–1 μl of the giant spheroplasts. Note that the addition of 20 mM Ca2+ (or Mg2+) in the pipette and bath solutions is necessary for gigOhm seal formation. We found that lowering the concentration of these divalent ions below millimolar range significantly affects the ability to obtain gigOhm seal. Under an inverted microscope (Nikon Eclipse TE300) equipped with ×10 ocular lenses and a ×40 phase contrast objective, the giant spheroplasts appear in different sizes and darkness. Note that not all the giant spheroplasts are adequate to form a gigOhm seal. We found that the giant spheroplasts with black or dark gray color are easier to form gigOhm seal than the transparent or grayish ones. With sufficient magnification under phase contrast (usually requires higher than ×200), coils of ruptured outer membrane can be visualized as rough materials around the surface, which should be excluded from the patch. The seal formation was monitored under the Seal Test window of a Clampex 8.1 software (Axon Instruments, Sunnyvale, CA). After initial attachment to the membrane and suction of the pipette by mouth, the seal resistance usually increased to ~20–50 megOhm rapidly. With continual application of negative pressure to the pipette by mouth, the seal resistance increased to ~1–2 gigOhm in a few seconds to minutes. We found that continuously holding the membrane at positive potentials (20–50 mV under the Gap-free mode of the Clampex 8.1 software) can often stabilize the seal and further increase the seal resistance to higher than 3 gigOhm in a few minutes. A membrane patch was then excised from the giant spheroplast by gently tapping the micromanipulator (Leica) that held the headstage of an EPC7 Patch Clamp Amplifier (HEKA Instruments, Southboro, MA). After excision of a membrane patch, gentle suctions by mouth were applied to the patch to confirm the presence of the standard mechanosensitive channel activities (usually MscS, mechanosensitive channel of small conductance) (15, 16) that serve as an internal control of correct membrane configuration. No pressure was applied to the membrane path afterward. The pipette tip was then positioned in front of the opening of a single-walled, 3-barrel glass tube (0.7 mm ID) of the SF-77B perfusion system (Warner Instruments, Hamden, CT). The perfusates were gravity-fed, and the flow speed at the opening of the tubing was estimated to be ~0.5 cm/s. Stepping of the perfusion channels was controlled by programmed protocols (Episodic stimulation mode) through an analog OUT channel in the Clampex 8.1 software and a Digidata1322A digitizer (Axon Instruments). The analog stepping signal was digitized and recorded together with those of the probe voltage and the membrane current for data analysis using a Clampfit 9.2 software (Axon Instruments). Before being digitized, the analog current signal was filtered inline with an 8-pole Bessel filter (Frequency Devices Inc., Haverhill, MA). The dead time (from the beginning of the stepping to the activation of channels) varied between 30 and 110 ms from patch to patch. This variation may be due to the varied pipette tip sizes and the distance between the membrane patch and the opening of the pipette tip. All the solutions containing sucrose were sterilized by 0.2-μm filtration and stored at room temperature. Concentrated nucleotide stocks were diluted into the perfusate before usage.
RESULTS
Strategy of Examining Foreign Channel Activity in E. coli
Fig. 1 summarizes the general methods of using E. coli to host the functional analyses of a foreign ion channel. Using BLAST (Basic Local Alignment Search Tool), we have compiled subtypes of prokaryotic K+ channel genes available from known bacterial and archaeal genomes (1). The desired channel gene is retrieved through PCR from the genomic DNA of the original organism and transformed into an E. coli strain for heterologous expression. Whether the channel gene produces a functional K+ conduit in the E. coli membrane can be surveyed in vivo by looking for K+-related phenotypes and in vitro by directly enlarging the same cells for patch clamping to detect the corresponding current.
As an example, gene homologues of animal cyclic nucleotide-gated cation channels (CNG or HCN) have been identified in a few bacterial genomes (1); however, their biophysical activities have not been successfully detected to date. One such gene homologue, mmaK in M. magnetotacticum, encodes a putative 389-residue K+ channel subunit containing six predicted trans-membrane segments (TMs) and a cytoplasmic cyclic-nucleotide binding domain (CNBD) at the carboxyl terminus (Fig. 2). A conserved K+ filter sequence, TVGFGD, is found between its TM5 and TM6. The entire coding sequence of mmaK has 90% similarity (37% identity, 53% positive) to the MloK1 channel from Mesorhizobium loti, whose CNBD has been crystallized and whose activity has been documented by population 86Rb+ uptake assay (13, 14), although not by electrophysiological methods. The “C-linker” that is typically found in the animal CNG and HCN channels are absent in both of the bacterial MmaK and MloK1 channels (Fig. 2).
Expression of MmaK Renders the E. coli Host Sensitive Specifically to K+ Ion in the Medium
The mmaK gene was cloned into the pB13d vector behind an araBAD promoter and transformed into the wild-type TOP10 E. coli cells. The E. coli host carrying the pB13d-MmaK plasmid is highly sensitive to the K+ concentrations in the growth medium even in the absence of the arabinose inducer (Fig. 3). On tryptone-based agarose plates, the mmaK-bearing cells can grow like control cells with or without added NaCl (Fig. 3A, bottom rows in plates 1–3) without losing colony-forming units (evident at the final dilution), although the colonies are thinner and therefore translucent (see “Discussion”). However, these mmaK-bearing cells cannot grow on plates with additional 10 or 50 mM KCl (Fig. 3A, bottom rows in plates 4 and 5, respectively), unlike the control (top rows in plates 4 and 5). This K+-sensitive phenotype is also observed in liquid medium. Adding 10 mM KCl to the exponentially growing cultures immediately stops the growth of the mmaK-bearing cells (Fig. 3B, filled circles in panel 3), but not the control cells (open circles). This growth inhibition in liquid medium is also specific to K+, but not to Na+, because adding equal molar NaCl has no effect on the growth of both cell types (Fig. 3B, panel 2). This K+-sensitive phenotype is very similar to that caused by the gain-of-function mutants of the native Kch channel of E. coli (18), indicating that the E. coli cells are able to express MmaK and to form a functional K+ conduit in its membrane. Note that the K+-sensitive phenotype observed in both cases was carried out in the absence of the corresponding inducers, reiterating that the leakage levels of the inducible promoters are enough to produce sufficient number of channels to give the observable phenotypes. This K+ sensitivity is the first reported phenotype caused by a foreign K+ channel gene in a wild-type E. coli, although others have shown rescue phenotypes of a K+ auxotroph (20–24).
Patch Clamp Analyses of MmaK in Enlarged E. coli Membrane
Because the in vivo phenotyping assay indicates that MmaK can be functionally expressed in E. coli, we then went on to test whether a corresponding K+-specific current can be detected on the E. coli membrane. The same mmaK-bearing cells were thus enlarged as giant spheroplasts for direct patch clamp analysis. L-Arabinose, the inducer of the araBAD promoter, was added to promote the expression and to maximize our chances of finding the corresponding current. The basic method of enlarging E. coli cells (15, 19) has been optimized for consistent giant spheroplast and gigOhm seal formation. To this end, we found the concentrations of lysozyme and EDTA to be critical (see “Experimental Procedures”). High resolution optics were adopted here to visually select the debris-free surface to increase the rate of obtaining gigOhm seals. Because MmaK contains a CNBD at its cytoplasmic carboxyl terminus, we employed the excised inside-out patch mode to allow presentation of the putative ligand, cAMP and cGMP. To resolve ligand activation time course, a rapid perfusate stepping system was also adopted to ensure rapid solution exchanges in tens of milliseconds.
MmaK Is Gated by Submicromollar cAMP and Micromollar cGMP from the Cytoplasmic Side
In a frequency of ~nine of ten excised patches examined, a cAMP-inducible macroscopic current is readily observed when a stream of perfusate containing 100 μM cAMP is brought to bathe the patch (n > 70, Fig. 4A, left), whereas the cells carrying the control empty vector have never shown this activity (n > 10, data not shown). The number of unitary conductance in an excised patch varies ~30 –300, although patches containing more than 600 units have also been observed occasionally. The cAMP activation and deactivation kinetics can each be fitted with a single exponential with a τ of 26.9 ± 9.3 ms and 1.77 ± 0.33 s, respectively (n = 13) (Fig. 4A, right). These fast activation and slow deactivation kinetics are similar to those of eukaryotic CNG channels (25), implicating a compatible gating mechanism involving the cyclic nucleotide binding domain, even though the bacterial MmaK channel does not contain the C-linker between its TM6 and the CNBD (Fig. 2). The cAMP dose response was examined between 0.1 and 100 μM and revealed a half-effective concentration (EC50) of 0.72 μM and a Hill coefficient (h) of ~1.2 (n = 5, Fig. 4B). Cyclic GMP apparently also activates MmaK, but with ~10-fold less efficacy than cAMP does (EC50 ~ 7.4 μM and h ~ 1.5, n = 2, Fig. 4B, right).
Besides the ensemble currents, the unitary current of MmaK was also observed after the deactivation of most of the channels in the ensemble. This microscopic unitary current reveals a unitary conductance of 10.8 pS at −100 mV of membrane potential (Fig. 4C). This is the first unitary conductance of a prokaryotic cAMP-activated K+ channel reported, and it is apparently larger than those of the eukaryotic HCN cation channels (26).
MmaK Conducts an Inwardly Rectified, K+-selective Current
The ion-conducting properties of the cAMP-induced MmaK current were examined by ramping the holding membrane potential from −150 to +150 mV. With 150 mM KCl at both sides of the membrane, we found that the current rectifies inwardly beginning near 0 mV, indicating the channel is voltage-sensitive in addition to being cAMP-activated (Fig. 5A, the K150 trace). MmaK contains a K+ filter sequence, TVGFGD, between TM5 and TM6 (Fig. 2). To test whether MmaK is selective for K+ ion, we replaced the KCl with NaCl perfusate and found that the latter reversibly abolishes the outward current (Fig. 5A, the Na150 trace, and 5B), indicating the channel indeed does not pass Na+. Thus, MmaK is likely to conduct K+ in the deep polarized membrane potential of the bacterium, explaining the in vivo phenotype above (Fig. 3, see also “Discussion”).
MmaK Is Inactivated by Slightly Acidic pH but Only from the Cytoplasmic Side
Several prokaryotic K+ channels are known to be regulated by pH (12, 17, 27, 28). To see whether the activity of MmaK is also modulated by pH, we perfused the cytoplasmic-side-out membrane patch with perfusates containing various pH values from 8.5 to 5.5. We found that MmaK is reversibly inactivated by slightly acidic pH values with a half inactivation pH of 7.0 and a Hill coefficient of 0.79 (n = 5, Fig. 6A). This acid inactivation only happens when the low pH is applied to the cytoplasmic side, because reducing the pH of the pipette solution to 5.5 does not inactivate MmaK (Fig. 6B). These results indicate that the pH-sensing module of the MmaK channel is located intracellularly.
By patch clamping the MmaK channel in the E. coli membrane, we found MmaK can reside in at least three functional states: closed, open, and acid-inactivated (Fig. 6C). The functionality of this bacterial cyclic nucleotide-gated K+ channel is apparently similar to other eukaryotic or prokaryotic K+ channels, having a sizable unitary conductance and being an intricate sensor of various metabolic and environmental signals: nucleotides, pH, and voltage.
DISCUSSION
In this report, we demonstrated that the model E. coli bacterium can be comparable with Xenopus oocyte as an arena for heterologous ion channel expression and characterization, in addition to its traditional role as the factory to produce foreign recombinant proteins. The ability to directly examine the electrophysiology of foreign prokaryotic ion channels in enlarged E. coli membrane (17, 29, 30) provides several technical advantages over the existing eukaryotic expression systems or reconstitutions. First, for prokaryotic channels, there is a better chance of their being functionally expressed in E. coli, a fellow prokaryote, than in eukaryotic cells. Second, giant spheroplasts can be prepared with relative ease, obviating the need of mRNA synthesis for injection or protein purification for reconstitution. Third, the reconstitution procedure has little control over how the channel protein is inserted into the artificial membranes, leading to possible questions on the orientation of the assembled channels. Because a giant spheroplast is essentially a large cell, there is no ambiguity in sidedness for on-cell or excised patches used. Forth, excised patches, together with rapid perfusion, allow resolution of the time course of channel activation, deactivation, and inactivation by ligands (e.g. Fig. 4), which is difficult to achieve with the technique of conventional planar lipid bilayer. Fifth, once generated, giant spheroplasts can be stored at −80 °C and be thawed for patch clamping without having to reinitiate preparation. Months of storage apparently have no detrimental effects on channel activities. Sixth, and most importantly, the need for only one construct not only saves time and effort but also ensures that the in vivo observations (phenotype) correspond to the in vitro ones (biophysics). Because the very same bacterial strain can now be examined on plate by genetics and under the electrode by biophysics, efficient cycling between the two powerful enterprises is anticipated.
A plate or tube phenotype is invaluable in microbial genetics to study the in vivo functions of a gene product. As shown in Fig. 2, MmaK renders E. coli sensitive to externally added K+, but not Na+. This K+-sensitive phenotype recapitulates the gain-of-function phenotype discovered after mutagenizing Kch, the gene that encodes the K+ channel native to E. coli (18). Externally enriched K+ apparently causes membrane depolarization through the gain-of-function Kch channels, resulting in the K+-specific growth phenotype (31). That mmaK-bearing cells phenocopy gain-of-function kch-bearing cells suggests a similar pathogenic mechanism (Fig. 7). The cellular cAMP of E. coli is known to vary between 0.5 and 10 μM (32). Here, we found the EC50 of cAMP in MmaK activation to be ~0.72 μM under patch clamp. Thus, this biophysical property in vitro is entirely compatible with the K+-sensitive phenotype in vivo, indicating that MmaK is constitutively activated by the cAMP in the host cells. This constitutive activity is reflected even in live cells grown in ordinary tryptone medium containing only ~0.5 mM of contaminating K+. Note that such cells grow to lower final density in liquid medium (Fig. 3B, panels 1 and 2) and make thin and therefore translucent colonies on plate (Fig. 3A, plates 1, 2, and 3), indicative of stress. We believe that MmaK channels in effect clamp the membrane potential (Vm) at or near the equilibrium potential of K+ (EK). This is tolerated when EK is reasonably deep as in ordinary medium, but the Vm would become too shallow (hypopolarized) for growth when EK is reduced by externally added K+ (Fig. 7). Therefore, it is likely that MmaK functions as a cytoplasmic cAMP sensor in transducing the chemical signal into electric ones (Vm or protonmotive force) in the original organism.
It is now possible to isolate gain- or loss-of-function MmaK mutations and directly correlate the biophysical alternations they cause with the amino acid substitutions. Further second-site intragenic suppressor mutations may give insights into amino acid interactions during gating. These assumption-free forward genetic methods, together with site-directed reverse genetics as predicted by sequence or crystal structure and spheroplast patch clamp, promise even deeper understanding of the structure-function relationship of ion channels.
Acknowledgments
We thank Dr. B. Martinac for the generous gift of M. magnetotacticum DNA.
Footnotes
This work was supported by National Institutes of Health Grants GM74821 (to S. C.), GM054867 (to Y. S.), and GM047856 (to C. K.) and the Vilas Trust of the University of Wisconsin-Madison.
The abbreviations used are: Mmak, cyclic nucleotide-gated potassium channel from M. magnetotacticum; MloK1, M. loti cyclic nucleotide-gated potassium channel; CNG, cyclic nucleotide-gated ion channel; HCN, hyperpolarization-activated cyclic nucleotide-gated ion channel; CNBD, cyclic nucleotide binding domain; MES, 4-morpholineethanesulfonic acid; TM, transmembrane.
References
- 1.Kuo MMC, Haynes WJ, Loukin SH, Kung C, Saimi Y. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2005;29:961–985. doi: 10.1016/j.femsre.2005.03.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Loukin SH, Kuo MMC, Zhou XL, Haynes WJ, Kung C, Saimi Y. J Gen Physiol. 2005;125:521–527. doi: 10.1085/jgp.200509261. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.MacKinnon R, Doyle DA. Nat Struct Biol. 1997;4:877–879. doi: 10.1038/nsb1197-877. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Doyle DA, Cabral JM, Pfuetzner RA, Kuo AL, Gulbis JM, Cohen SL, Chait BT, MacKinnon R. Science. 1998;280:69–77. doi: 10.1126/science.280.5360.69. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Jiang YX, Lee A, Chen JY, Cadene M, Chait BT, MacKinnon R. Nature. 2002;417:515–522. doi: 10.1038/417515a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Jiang YX, Lee A, Chen JY, Ruta V, Cadene M, Chait BT, MacKinnon R. Nature. 2003;423:33–41. doi: 10.1038/nature01580. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Kuo A, Gulbis JM, Antcliff JF, Rahman T, Lowe ED, Zimmer J, Cuthbertson J, Ashcroft FM, Ezaki T, Doyle DA. Science. 2003;300:1922–1926. doi: 10.1126/science.1085028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Kuo AL, Domene C, Johnson LN, Doyle DA, Venien-Bryan C. Structure. 2005;13:1463–1472. doi: 10.1016/j.str.2005.07.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Shi N, Ye S, Alam A, Chen L, Jiang Y. Nature. 2006;440:570–574. doi: 10.1038/nature04508. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Ruta V, Jiang YX, Lee A, Chen JY, MacKinnon R. Nature. 2003;422:180–185. doi: 10.1038/nature01473. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Heginbotham L, LeMasurier M, Kolmakova-Partensky L, Miller C. J Gen Physiol. 1999;114:551–560. doi: 10.1085/jgp.114.4.551. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Enkvetchakul D, Bhattacharyya J, Jeliazkova I, Groesbeck DK, Cukras CA, Nichols CG. J Biol Chem. 2004;279:47076–47080. doi: 10.1074/jbc.C400417200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Clayton GM, Silverman WR, Heginbotham L, Morais-Cabral JH. Cell. 2004;119:615–627. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2004.10.030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Nimigean CM, Shane T, Miller C. J Gen Physiol. 2004;124:203–210. doi: 10.1085/jgp.200409133. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Martinac B, Buechner M, Delcour AH, Adler J, Kung C. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1987;84:2297–2301. doi: 10.1073/pnas.84.8.2297. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Kung C. Nature. 2005;436:647–654. doi: 10.1038/nature03896. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Kuo MMC, Baker KA, Wong L, Choe S. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007;104:2151–2156. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0609085104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Kuo MMC, Saimi Y, Kung C. EMBO J. 2003;22:4049–4058. doi: 10.1093/emboj/cdg409. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Blount P, Sukharev SI, Moe PC, Martinac B, Kung C. Methods Enzymol. 1999;294:458–482. doi: 10.1016/s0076-6879(99)94027-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Sun S, Gan JH, Paynter JJ, Tucker SJ. Physiol Genomics. 2006;26:1–7. doi: 10.1152/physiolgenomics.00026.2006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Parfenova LV, Crane BM, Rothberg BS. J Biol Chem. 2006;281:21131–21138. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M603109200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Ptak CP, Cuello LG, Perozo E. Biochemistry. 2005;44:62–71. doi: 10.1021/bi048390f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Sesti F, Rajan S, Gonzalez-Colaso R, Nikolaeva N, Goldstein SA. Nat Neurosci. 2003;6:353–361. doi: 10.1038/nn1028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Hellmer J, Zeilinger C. FEBS Lett. 2003;547:165–169. doi: 10.1016/s0014-5793(03)00706-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Zufall F, Hatt H, Firestein S. J Biol Chem. 1993;90:9335–9339. doi: 10.1073/pnas.90.20.9335. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.DiFrancesco D, Mangoni M. J Physiol. 1994;474:473–482. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1994.sp020038. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Gao L, Mi X, Paajanen V, Wang K, Fan Z. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005;102:17630–17635. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0505158102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Li Y, Berke I, Chen L, Jiang Y. J Gen Physiol. 2007;129:109–120. doi: 10.1085/jgp.200609655. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Santos JS, Lundby A, Zazueta C, Montal M. J Gen Physiol. 2006;128:283–292. doi: 10.1085/jgp.200609572. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Nakayama Y, Fujiu K, Sokabe M, Yoshimura K. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007;104:5883–5888. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0609996104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Kuo MM-C. PhD thesis. University of Wisconsin; Madison: 2005. Prokaryotic K+ Channels: A Survey and a Case Study on the Biological Functions of the Escherichia coli Kch. [Google Scholar]
- 32.Botsford JL. Microbiol Rev. 1981;45:620–642. doi: 10.1128/mr.45.4.620-642.1981. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Zagotta WN, Olivier NB, Black KD, Young EC, Olson R, Gouaux E. Nature. 2003;425:200–205. doi: 10.1038/nature01922. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Harold FM, Maloney PC. In: Escherichia coli and Salmonella. Neidhardt FC, editor. Vol. 1. ASM Press; Washington, D. C: 1996. pp. 283–306. [Google Scholar]