Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2012 Nov 2;338(1):24–30. doi: 10.1111/1574-6968.12018

The Role of Ionic Interactions in the Adherence of the S. epidermidis Adhesin SdrF to Prosthetic Material

Faustino A Toba 1,a, Livia Visai 2, Sheetal Trivedi 1, Franklin D Lowy 1,3
PMCID: PMC3521083  NIHMSID: NIHMS413558  PMID: 23039791

Abstract

Staphylococcus epidermidis infections are common complications of prosthetic device implantation. SdrF, a surface protein, appears to play a critical role in the initial colonization step by adhering to type I collagen and Dacron™. The role of ionic interactions in S. epidermidis adherence to prosthetic material was examined. SdrF was cloned and expressed in Lactococcus lactis. The effect of pH, cation concentration and detergents on adherence to different types of plastic surfaces was assessed by crystal violet staining and bacterial cell counting. SdrF, in contrast with controls and other S. epidermidis surface proteins, bound to hydrophobic materials such as polystyrene. Binding was an ionic interaction and was affected by surface charge of the plastic, pH and cation concentration. Adherence of the SdrF construct was increased to positively charged plastics and was reduced by increasing concentrations of Ca2+ and Na+. Binding was optimal at pH 7.4. Kinetic studies demonstrated that the SdrF B domain, as well as one of the B subdomains was sufficient to mediate binding. The SdrF construct also bound more avidly to Goretex™ than the lacotococcal control. SdrF is a multifunctional protein that contributes to prosthetic devices infections by ionic, as well as specific receptor-ligand interactions.

Introduction

Infections are among the most common complications of prosthetic device implantation (Baddour, et al., 2003, Gandelman, et al., 2007, Wang, et al., 2007). The capacity of bacteria to adhere to these devices through both specific and nonspecific interactions is a critical first step in the initiation of these infections (Broekhuizen, et al., 2006, Tsapikouni, et al., 2008, Otto, 2009). This problem is enhanced when the infection involves devices such as ventricular assist devices that are critical to patient survival (Rose, et al., 2001). Infections involving these devices occur in 15-30% of patients and generally require either device removal or transplantation in order to affect a cure (Herrmann, et al., 1997, Holman, et al., 1997, Gordon, et al., 2006) [INTERMACS (www.intermacs.org)].

Staphylococcus epidermidis remains the most common cause of prosthetic device-related infections (Simon, et al., 2005, Gordon, et al., 2006). As part of the commensal skin flora, staphylococci are uniquely situated to contaminate wounds when cutaneous barriers are breached. Surface proteins known as microbial surface components recognizing adhesive matrix molecules (MSCRAMMs) facilitate the initial colonization step (Patti, et al., 1994, MacKintosh, et al., 2006, Otto, 2009). SdrF, a S. epidermidis surface protein, appears to contribute to the initiation of prosthetic device infections. Previous studies showed that SdrF, a member of the serine-aspartate (SD) family of surface proteins, binds type-I collagen and mediates adhesion of S. epidermidis to the ventricular assisted device (VAD) driveline (Bowden, et al., 2005, Arrecubieta, et al., 2007, Arrecubieta, et al., 2009). Surprisingly it was also found that SdrF also dramatically enhanced adherence to Dacron, the material that covers the driveline, presumably by ionic interactions (Arrecubieta, et al., 2009). In light of the potential contribution of this ionic interaction to the initiation of infection, we further examined the nature of this process.

Methods

Strains, plasmid and growth conditions

Lactococcus lactis MG1363 (Wells, 1993) was grown at 30°C in M17 media supplemented with 0.5% glucose. MG1363 strains containing the plasmid pOri23 (Que, et al., 2000) expression vector were grown in media supplemented with erythromycin (5 g/ml). Escherichia coli XL-1 (Qiagen, CA) was grown at 37°C in LB media. XL-1 containing his-tag expression plasmid pQE30 (Qiagen, CA) were grown in media supplemented with Ampicillin (100 g/ml). Five different previously prepared E. coli constructs using the pQE30 expression plasmid were used in this study (Arrecubieta, et al., 2007). These constructs expressed different components of the SdrF B domain including sdrFrB1-4, sdrFrB1, sdrFrB2, sdrFrB3, and sdrFrB4. S. epidermidis strain 9491, a SdrF positive strain, was also used in this study (McCrea, et al., 2000, Arrecubieta, et al., 2007, Arrecubieta, et al., 2009).

Recombinant strains, proteins and antibodies

S. epidermidis SdrF and sub-clones were cloned into the expression vector pOri23 and transformed into MG1363, as described (Arrecubieta, et al., 2007, Arrecubieta, et al., 2009). The same sub-clones were cloned into pQE30 his-tag expression system (Qiagen, CA) and expressed from XL-1. These proteins were purified as previously described using His-trap columns (Pierce, IL) (Arrecubieta, et al., 2007). Purified proteins were biotinylated with EZ-Link NHS-LC-Biotin (Pierce, IL). Polyclonal antibodies directed against the A and B domains of SdrF were used as previously described (Arrecubieta, et al., 2007, Arrecubieta, et al., 2009).

Bacterial adherence assays

Adherence assays were carried out in 96-well plates as previously described (Arrecubieta, et al., 2007, Arrecubieta, et al., 2009). Mid-log phase MG1363 cells were suspended in phosphate buffer saline (PBS) to a final OD600=0.1. Aliquots of 100 l were added to the wells and incubated for 1 hour at 37°C. Wells were washed with PBS and attached cells were stained with crystal violet for direct cell counting or were recovered by three sequential 5-minute treatments with Trypsin/EDTA at 37°C and then plated on GM17 agar for cell counts (Arrecubieta, et al., 2009).

Three differently charged 96-well plastic plates were studied, Tissue Culture (TC), Primaria and Polysterene (Becton Dickinson, NJ). A second type of prosthetic material frequently used in prosthetic devices, Goretex™, was also used in adherence assays. To further examine the nature of the ionic interaction different environmental conditions were studied including: pH (4.5, 7.2 and 9.5), cations (calcium, lithium, magnesium, sodium) and disruptive agents (Tween20, Sigma, MO) prepared in PBS (Sigma, MO).

Each experiment was performed at least three times and each time point was performed in triplicate. Data were analyzed using an unpaired Student’s t test. A value of p<0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.

Protein surface-interaction

Purified His-tagged proteins were biotinylated and attached to 96-well plates as previously described (Arrecubieta, et al., 2007). Briefly, adherent biotin-labeled proteins were incubated with HRP-avidin (DakoCytomation, Glostrup, Denmark) for 30 min at 22°C. After PBS washing, binding of the HRP-avidin was quantified by adding the substrate o-phenylenediamine dihydrochloride and measuring the resulting absorbance at 490nm in a microplate reader (Bio-Rad, CA). Attachment assays were carried out in three different 96-well plate materials described above. All reagents were purchased from Sigma (St. Louis, MO).

Results

Adherence of L. lactis expressing SdrF to plastic

Adherence of L. lactis expressing the S. epidermidis surface protein SdrF to three different types of plastic was examined at three different initial bacterial concentrations. The Primaria plates are positively charged, while the polystyrene plates have a net neutral charge and the TC plates are negatively charged. The SdrF expressing constructs showed increased attachment to the three different plastic plates tested when compared with the lactococcal controls at the two higher initial bacterial inocula (ODs 0.5 and 1.0; p<0.01). (Figure 1) (p<0.05). Attachment was highest to the Primaria™ plates, an increase of 70%, when compared to either the polystyrene or TC plates.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Adherence of the S. epidermidis surface protein, SdrF, expressed in L. lactis to three different types of polystyrene plates, Tissue culture (TC), Polystyrene, and Primaria. Three different initial bacterial concentrations were used in these assays. these are indicated by the OD in the horizontal axis. Adherence of L. lactis strains expressing SdrF were compared with the control strain MG1363 containing the pORI plasmid without insert .

SdrF has two ligand binding domains, the A and B domains. The B domain, composed of four structurally similar subdomains, mediates binding to collagen. Previous studies found that the B4 subdomain was sufficient to mediate this binding interaction (Arrecubieta, et al., 2007). The SdrF B4 subdomain, was also capable of mediating attachment to the Primaria™ plates, although adherence to the other two types of plastic was reduced when compared to SdrF (Figure 2). Antibodies targeting the SdrF B-domain, but not the A-domain, reduced adherence of SdrF-lactis to the polystyrene plates (Figure 3) (p<0.05) further suggesting that the SdrF interaction with plastic is through its B-domain

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Adherence of the SdrF B4 purified protein to the different plastic surfaces, Tissue culture (TC), Polystyrene, and Primaria.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

The effect of antibodies directed against the SdrF A and B domains effect on attachment of L. lactis strains MG1363 expressing SdrF to polystyrene was examined at two different concentrations. PreI indicates preimmune sera that was used as a control. Anti-A, antibody directed against the SdrF A domain; Anti-B, antibody directed against the SdrF B domain

Binding to Goretex (polytetrafluoroethylene), a second hydrophobic material frequently used in prosthetic material, was also assessed. While the lactococcal expressing SdrF construct demonstrated enhanced binding to the material (p<.05) neither the isolated A or B domains of SdrF or a SdrF positive S. epidermidis, 9491, demonstrated enhanced binding when compared with the controls (Figure 4).

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Adherence to Goretex. Adherence of the control strain MG1363, SdrF expressed in L. lactis, compared with the isolated A or B domains expressed in L. lactis and the S. epidermidis SdrF positive strain 9491.

Effect of cations, pH and detergents on adherence

Increasing concentrations of the cations sodium, lithium and calcium reduced the attachment of L. lactis expressing SdrF (Figure 5A). Similar effects were observed when the B4 subunit of the SdrF was challenged with increasing cation concentration. Ca2+ and Na+ cations showed the largest effect on SdrF expressing clones to the polystyrene surface reducing adherence to plastic by 53% and 60%, respectively (Figure 5B and C).

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Effect of varying cation concentrations on the adherence of SdrF, the B domain and B4 subdomain to polystyrene. (A) L. lactis expressing SdrF, (B) purified SdrF B domain and (C) purified SdrF B4 subdomain.

Effect of pH and detergents on adherence

L. lactis expressing SdrF bound to plastic most efficiently at pH 7.4 (Figure 6A). Increasing concentrations of the detergents Tween-20 and beta-D-octylglucoside reduced adherence of L. lactis expressing SdrF (Figure 6B), the SdrF B domain and SdrF B4 subdomain to polystyrene plastic (Figure 6C and D). Beta-D-octylglucoside produced a greater effect than Tween-20 with the SdrF B1,4 and SdrF B4 interaction with polystyrene (p<.05) (Figure 6C and D). The protein denaturing agents urea and guanidine chloride also affected the adherence of the SdrF B domain and its sub-domain B4 to the polystyrene wells (Figure 6C and D). Guanidine chloride caused a larger reduction in binding by the SdrF B domain and its subdomain B4 (p<.05).

Figure 6.

Figure 6

A. Effect of pH on L. lactis expressing SdrF adherence to polystyrene. B. The effect of Tween on L. lactis expressing SdrF adherence to polystyrene. C. Adherence of purified SdrF B domain and D. purified SdrF B4 subdomain to polystyrene in the presence of detergents and disruptive agents.

Discussion

S. epidermidis is one of the primary pathogens responsible for prosthetic device infections (von Eiff, et al., 2002). In a previous study, we utilized the lactococcal heterologous expression system to demonstrate that SdrF mediates bacterial adherence to the ventricular assist device extracutaneous Dacron covered drivelines.(Arrecubieta, et al., 2009). This suggested that SdrF-Dacron surface interactions contributes to the initiation of prosthetic device infections. This study further explored the nature of this interaction.

Attachment assays to polystyrene showed that L. lactis strains expressing SdrF adhered better to polystyrene, especially to the Primaria™ plates, than did the plasmid controls. Both TC and Primaria™ plates are modified polystyrene plastic. In the case of TC plastic, the addition of COOH groups to the polystyrene polymer confers a net negative charge to the surface of the polymer. On the other hand, Primaria™ plates are modified by the incorporation of NH2 groups, which makes the plates positively charged. The higher attachment observed in the Primaria™ suggests that SdrF, a negatively charged molecule, preferentially binds the positively charged plate via ionic interactions.

Antibodies targeting the B, but not the A, domain showed a reduction of bacteria expressing SdrF attachment to polystyrene, suggesting that the interaction occurs via the negatively charged B domain and also that its subdomains are sufficient to mediate attachment (McCrea, et al., 2000).

The cation concentration (ionic strength) of a solution also affects protein-surface interactions. Cations can interfere with the hydrostatic and electrostatic forces that operate in the adsorption of proteins to surfaces (Agnihotri & Siedlecki, 2004, Tsapikouni, et al., 2008). Increasing concentrations of several ions (Ca2+, Li1+, Na1+, Mg2+) reduced the attachment bacteria expressing SdrF and the B domain and subunit to polystyrene. These results add further support to the observation that the attachment of SdrF to polystyrene is ionic and is perturbed by increasing concentrations of ions in the solution.

Calcium cations caused a greater reduction of attachment with a lower concentration than any of the other ions assayed. Sequence analysis of SdrF B domain revealed high sequence similarity with another staphylococcal surface protein, clumping factor A (ClfA) (O’Connell, et al., 1998). Like SdrF, ClfA is also a binding protein that, in the case of CflA, binds fibrinogen (O’Connell, et al., 1998). ClfA-fibrinogen binding is localized to a region where the sequence resembles the Ca2+-binding EF-hand motif often found in eukaryotic binding proteins (D’Souza, et al., 1990, O’Connell, et al., 1998). In these proteins Ca2+ interferes with protein-ligand interaction either by occupying the ligand-binding site or binding to another site and causing a conformational change in the protein that prohibits the binding of the ligand. The steep reduction observed with increased Ca2+ concentration suggests that SdrF-polystyrene ionic interaction may depend on the conformational state of the protein.

The pH value of the surrounding solution affects the properties of both, the polymer and the protein. Our results suggest that at values close to physiological pH the interaction between SdrF and polystyrene surfaces was optimal. The pH affects the protonation of proteins and surfaces (Matsumoto, et al., 2003). Preliminary predictions made using Protean (DNASTAR Lasergene 8) suggest that at physiological pH (7.4) SdrF has an overall negative charge (near - 324.4) with the B domain concentrating most of that negative overall charge. These preliminary predictions might help explain the ionic nature of the SdrF-polystyrene interaction and its preference for slightly positively charge surfaces.

Detergents (i.e. Tween-20 and beta-D-octylglucoside) and disruptive agents (i.e. urea and guanidine chloride) are also known to perturb protein-surface interactions, as these molecules denature or perturb the protein structure (Boks, et al., 2008). Increasing concentrations of the nonionic surfactant Tween20 reduced the interaction between SdrF as well as the B domain constructs and the polystyrene surface. Both of these detergents are used in the pharmaceutical industry and contact lenses to avoid protein and microbial adsorption to the material (Santos, et al., 2007){(Santos, et al., 2007)Wang, 2008 #55} due to their amphiphilic properties.

The effect of guanidine chloride on SdrF B4-polystyrene interaction was higher than the effect of urea. Although still controversial, these two disruptive agents appear to denature proteins in different ways (Lim, et al., 2009). While urea seems to create hydrogen bonds to the peptide group, guanidine chloride appears to disrupt the main backbone of the peptide (Lim, et al., 2009). Guanidine chloride is usually more effective than urea when the peptide contain helices stabilized by planar residues (Lim, et al., 2009). This indicates that the SdrF-polystyrene interaction depends on the tertiary structure of the peptide, specifically the SdrF B4 sub-domain.

A limitation of the study is that we were unable to create S. epidermidis strains that were isogenic for SdrF. The availability of an isogenic pair would have added further information regarding the role of SdrF in these binding interactions.

SdrF appears to be a unique protein, capable of helping to initiate prosthetic device infections in different ways. It is present on the vast majority of S. epidermidis strains, can bind to Dacron or other prosthetic materials via ionic interactions and is also capable of adhering to matrix molecules such as collagen that coat internal portion of these devices via specific receptor-ligand interactions. Further investigation of this and other S. epidermidis surface proteins is warranted.

Acknowledgement

This work was supported in part by the National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute-Specialized Center for Clinically Oriented Research (grant HL 077096-01).

Thoratec Corporation (Pleasanton, CA) kindly provided the Dacron™ material currently used on the exterior surface of the Heartmate VAD DLs.

Footnotes

None of the authors have a conflict of interest with any of the material in this manuscript.

References

  1. Agnihotri A, Siedlecki CA. Time-dependent conformational changes in fibrinogen measured by atomic force microscopy. Langmuir: the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids. 2004;20:8846–8852. doi: 10.1021/la049239+. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Arrecubieta C, Lee MH, Macey A, Foster TJ, Lowy FD. SdrF, a Staphylococcus epidermidis surface protein, binds type I collagen. J Biol Chem. 2007;282:18767–18776. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M610940200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Arrecubieta C, Toba FA, von Bayern M, Akashi H, Deng MC, Naka Y, Lowy FD. SdrF, a Staphylococcus epidermidis surface protein, contributes to the initiation of ventricular assist device driveline-related infections. PLoS Pathog. 2009;5:e1000411. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1000411. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Baddour LM, Bettmann MA, Bolger AF, et al. Nonvalvular cardiovascular device-related infections. Circulation. 2003;108:2015–2031. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000093201.57771.47. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Boks NP, Norde W, van der Mei HC, Busscher HJ. Forces involved in bacterial adhesion to hydrophilic and hydrophobic surfaces. Microbiology. 2008;154:3122–3133. doi: 10.1099/mic.0.2008/018622-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Bowden MG, Chen W, Singvall J, et al. Identification and preliminary characterization of cell-wall-anchored proteins of Staphylococcus epidermidis. Microbiology. 2005;151:1453–1464. doi: 10.1099/mic.0.27534-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Broekhuizen CA, de Boer L, Schipper K, et al. Peri-implant tissue is an important niche for Staphylococcus epidermidis in experimental biomaterial-associated infection in mice. Infect Immun. 2006 doi: 10.1128/IAI.01262-06. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. D’Souza SE, Ginsberg MH, Burke TA, Plow EF. The ligand binding site of the platelet integrin receptor GPIIb-IIIa is proximal to the second calcium binding domain of its alpha subunit. The Journal of biological chemistry. 1990;265:3440–3446. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Gandelman G, Frishman WH, Wiese C, Green-Gastwirth V, Hong S, Aronow WS, Horowitz HW. Intravascular device infections: epidemiology, diagnosis, and management. Cardiol Rev. 2007;15:13–23. doi: 10.1097/01.crd.0000197966.53529.67. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Gordon RJ, Quagliarello B, Lowy FD. Ventricular assist device-related infections. Lancet Infect Dis. 2006;6:426–437. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(06)70522-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Herrmann M, Weyand M, Greshake B, von Eiff C, Proctor RA, Scheld HH, Peters G. Left ventricular assist device infection is associated with increased mortality but is not a contraindication to transplantation. Circulation. 1997;95:814–817. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.95.4.814. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Holman WL, Bourge RC, Spruell RD, Murrah CP, McGiffin DC, Kirklin JK. Ventricular assist devices as a bridge to cardiac transplantation. A prelude to destination therapy. Ann Surg. 1997;225:695–704. doi: 10.1097/00000658-199706000-00007. discussion 705-696. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Lim WK, Rosgen J, Englander SW. Urea, but not guanidinium, destabilizes proteins by forming hydrogen bonds to the peptide group. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2009;106:2595–2600. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0812588106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. MacKintosh EE, Patel JD, Marchant RE, Anderson JM. Effects of biomaterial surface chemistry on the adhesion and biofilm formation of Staphylococcus epidermidis in vitro. Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A. 2006;78:836–842. doi: 10.1002/jbm.a.30905. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Matsumoto H, Koyama Y, Tanioka A. Interaction of proteins with weak amphoteric charged membrane surfaces: effect of pH. Journal of colloid and interface science. 2003;264:82–88. doi: 10.1016/s0021-9797(03)00417-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. McCrea KW, Hartford O, Davis S, et al. The serine-aspartate repeat (Sdr) protein family in Staphylococcus epidermidis. Microbiology. 2000;146:1535–1546. doi: 10.1099/00221287-146-7-1535. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. O’Connell DP, Nanavaty T, McDevitt D, Gurusiddappa S, Hook M, Foster TJ. The fibrinogen-binding MSCRAMM (clumping factor) of Staphylococcus aureus has a Ca2+-dependent inhibitory site. J Biol Chem. 1998;273:6821–6829. doi: 10.1074/jbc.273.12.6821. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Otto M. Staphylococcus epidermidis--the ‘accidental’ pathogen. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2009;7:555–567. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro2182. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Patti JM, Allen BL, McGavin MJ, Hook M. MSCRAMM-mediated adherence of microorganisms to host tissues. Annu Rev Microbiol. 1994;48:585–617. doi: 10.1146/annurev.mi.48.100194.003101. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Que YA, Haefliger JA, Francioli P, Moreillon P. Expression of Staphylococcus aureus clumping factor A in Lactococcus lactis subsp. cremoris using a new shuttle vector. Infect Immun. 2000;68:3516–3522. doi: 10.1128/iai.68.6.3516-3522.2000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Rose EA, Gelijns AC, Moskowitz AJ, et al. Long-term mechanical left ventricular assistance for end-stage heart failure. N Engl J Med. 2001;345:1435–1443. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa012175. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Santos L, Rodrigues D, Lira M, Oliveira R, Real Oliveira ME, Vilar EY, Azeredo J. The effect of octylglucoside and sodium cholate in Staphylococcus epidermidis and Pseudomonas aeruginosa adhesion to soft contact lenses. Optometry and vision science: official publication of the American Academy of Optometry. 2007;84:429–434. doi: 10.1097/OPX.0b013e318058a0cc. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Simon D, Fischer S, Grossman A, Downer C, Hota B, Heroux A, Trenholme G. Left ventricular assist device-related infection: treatment and outcome. Clin Infect Dis. 2005;40:1108–1115. doi: 10.1086/428728. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Tsapikouni TS, Allen S, Missirlis YF. Measurement of interaction forces between fibrinogen coated probes and mica surface with the atomic force microscope: The pH and ionic strength effect. Biointerphases. 2008;3:1–8. doi: 10.1116/1.2840052. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. von Eiff C, Peters G, Heilmann C. Pathogenesis of infections due to coagulase-negative staphylococci. Lancet Infect Dis. 2002;2:677–685. doi: 10.1016/s1473-3099(02)00438-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Wang A, Athan E, Pappas PA, et al. Contemporary clinical profile and outcome of prosthetic valve endocarditis. JAMA. 2007;297:1354–1361. doi: 10.1001/jama.297.12.1354. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES