Abstract
It is well known that ErbB2, a receptor tyrosine kinase, localizes on the plasma membrane. Here we describe a novel observation that ErbB2 also localizes in mitochondria of cancer cells and patient samples. We found that ErbB2 translocates into mitochondria through the association with mtHSP70. Additionally, mitochondrial ErbB2 (mtErbB2) negatively regulates mitochondrial respiratory functions. Oxygen consumption and activities of complexes of the mitochondrial electron transport chain were decreased in mtErbB2-overexpressing cells. Mitochondrial membrane potential and the cellular ATP level also were decreased. In contrast, mtErbB2 enhanced cellular glycolysis. The translocation of ErbB2 and its impact on mitochondrial function are kinase dependent. Interestingly, cancer cells with higher levels of mtErbB2 were more resistant to ErbB2 targeting antibody trastuzumab. Our study provides a novel perspective on the metabolic regulatory function of ErbB2 and reveals that mtErbB2 plays an important role in the regulation of cellular metabolism and cancer cell resistance to therapeutics.
Introduction
Most cancer cells take up glucose at higher rates than normal cells, but use a smaller fraction of this glucose for oxidative phosphorylation1–9. Although the molecular mechanisms underlying this phenomenon remain unclear, increased glycolysis in cancer cells has been well accepted to be an important process to support malignant phenotypes6. The importance of this effect is further underscored by recent studies which reported that impaired mitochondrial function renders cancer cells resistance to apoptosis and chemotherapy10,11. Our recent studies also demonstrated that inhibiting glycolysis sensitizes cancer cells to the chemotherapeutic agent paclitaxel12 and ErbB2 targeting antibody trastuzumab13. This suggests that mitochondrial function and cellular metabolism play a critical role in cancer progression and therapeutic resistance.
ErbB2 (also known as Her2/neu) is an oncogene that is overexpressed in many types of cancers and is correlated with a poor prognosis14. We and others15–19 have previously demonstrated that ErbB2 increases the transformation and/or metastatic potential of human breast cancer. In addition, ErbB2 has been shown to activate signaling molecules which regulate bioenergetic metabolism17,19,20,21,22. Our previous study showed that ErbB2 promotes cancer cell growth and glycolysis through increased expression of lactate dehydrogenase isoform A (LDH-A)23. However, it is unclear whether, in addition to the enhancement of glycolysis, ErbB2 also regulates cell metabolism through additional processes. It is well established that ErbB2 localizes to the plasma membrane where it phosphorylates downstream substrates on their tyrosine residues in response to extracellular stimulation. Recent studies also have shown that ErbB2 can translocate into the nucleus and putatively function as a transcription factor24. One study has shown that Heregulin β1 regulates cytochrome c oxidase subunit II in mammary epithelial cells25. Another report described that the blockade of the ErbB2 receptor induces cardiomyocyte death through mitochondria and reactive oxygen species-dependent pathways26. Moreover, tyrosine phosphorylation and de-phosphorylation of proteins in mitochondria have been reported through several important kinases and phosphatases, such as PKC and Abl27, Src28, MAPK29, and Shp-230. In addition, EGFR, another member of the EGFR family proteins, has been reported to translocate into mitochondria31. These studies suggest that the subcellular localization of ErbB2 may define its signaling specificity and ErbB2 may regulate mitochondrial functions.
Results
Localization of ErbB2 in Mitochondria of cancer cells
While investigating the role of ErbB2 in regulating cellular metabolism, we unexpectedly observed that ErbB2 also exists in the mitochondria of ErbB2-positive breast cancer cells. We analyzed the organelle fractions from multiple breast cancer cell lines and patient samples (Supplementary Methods). In addition to plasma membrane and cytoplasmic fractions, ErbB2 was present in mitochondrial fraction of two ErbB2 transfected cancer cell lines MCF7/ErbB2 and MDA-MB-231/ErbB2, and of two natural ErbB2-positive cancer cell lines BT474 and SKBR3, detected by Western blotting (Fig. 1A). To eliminate the possibility that the bands of mtErbB2 were due to contamination from other organelles, the Western blots were probed for different cellular organelle markers. The results indicate that the mitochondrial fraction we prepared was of high purity. Similar results were obtained from tumor samples of ErbB2-positive breast cancer patients and the MCF7 breast cancer cells which express moderate levels of ErbB2 (Fig. 1B). We also observed that ErbB2 also localized in the mitochondria of the heart and liver tissues of normal mouse (Fig. 1B), suggesting that the mitochondrial localization of ErbB2 is not due to overexpression of ErbB2, which may lead to mislocalization.
To further verify these results, fluorescent microscopy was performed using the MCF-7/ErbB2 cells. The images showed that ErbB2 (red) was sporadically distributed in the cytoplasm in addition to the strong staining of the plasma membrane (Fig. 1C). After merging red (ErbB2) and green (Mitotracker), the image showed a yellow color, supporting that ErbB2 is present in mitochondria. Similar results were also detected in SKBR3 cells, which naturally overexpress endogenous ErbB2 (Supplementary Fig. S1). The mitochondrial localization of ErbB2 was further confirmed by immuno-gold transmission electron microscopy in SKBR3 cells (Supplementary Fig. S2).
To determine whether ErbB2 was inside of mitochondria, we conducted protease sensitivity experiments by incubation of mitochondria with proteinase K in the presence or absence of triton X-100. Without triton X-100, ErbB2 and Prohibitin (an inner membrane protein) were resistant to proteinase K, whereas Bcl-2, which is localized on the outer membrane, was degraded (Fig. 1D). When proteinase K was added to mitochondria in the presence of triton X-100, all of the proteins were degraded, indicating that like Prohibitin, ErbB2 exists inside of mitochondria.
Identification of the Mitochondrial Targeting Sequence
We next studied whether ErbB2 has an endogenous mitochondrial targeting sequence (MTS) and how ErbB2 translocates into mitochondria. An online mitochondrial localization prediction program showed that ErbB2 has a strong possibility of localizing in mitochondria (Supplementary Table S1), suggesting that ErbB2 may have an endogenous MTS. The juxtamembrane region of the ErbB2 contains basic amino acids, which are similar to other known mitochondrial proteins, such as Tom20. These proteins contain a MTS consisting of highly hydrophobic and basic amino acid-rich sequences in their transmembrane domains (TMD) and membrane flanking regions. To determine whether the juxtamembrane region of ErbB2 constitutes a functional MTS, expression plasmids encoding GFP-tagged ErbB2 trans- and juxtamembrane sequences were constructed (Fig. 2A). The constructs included GFP alone, GFP plus the ErbB2 juxtamembrane region (aa 646–689), GFP fused with TMD (aa 623–645), and GFP plus transmembrane domain fused with juxtamembrane region (aa 623–689). These constructs were transfected into MCF7 cells. The location of GFP alone and the GFP-ErbB2 fusion proteins was determined by fluorescent microscopy. The results showed that the juxtamembrane (aa 646–689) domain contains a nuclear localization signal and the distribution of GFP was mostly in the nucleus. Transmembrane domain alone (aa 623–645) was insufficient to target GFP into mitochondria. However, the fused domains (aa 623–689) did target the GFP into mitochondria, indicating that this region is sufficient for ErbB2 localization to the mitochondria.
To determine whether the basic amino acid-rich sequence in the juxtamembrane and transmembrane region was required for ErbB2 translocation into mitochondria, expression plasmids encoding ErbB2 with an aa 623–689 deletion (ErbB2ΔMTS) were transfected into MDA-MB-231 cells. The mitochondrial fractions were isolated and the samples subjected to Western Blotting analysis. Fig. 2B shows that ErbB2 with the aa 623–689 deletion could not translocate into mitochondria, defining a novel mitochondrial targeting function of this region in ErbB2. We also conducted confocal imaging analysis and the co-localization was analyzed by NIH ImageJ software in 231ErbB2WT, 231ErbB2Mito and 231ErbB2ΔMTS cells. Approximately 80% 231ErbB2Mito cells showed mitochondrial localization of ErbB2 and only 10% 231ErbB2ΔMTS cells showed mtErbB2 localization (data not shown). Together, these results clearly indicate that the transmembrane domain plus aa 646–689 of ErbB2 are both sufficient and necessary for mitochondrial localization of ErbB2.
mtHSP70-Dependent Translocation of ErbB2 into mitochondria
To study how ErbB2 was translocated into mitochondria, immunoprecipitation with antibodies against ErbB2 was conducted using mitochondrial proteins extracted from ErbB2-positive SKBR3 cells to identify mitochondrial proteins that interact with ErbB2. An SDS-PAGE gel of the immunoprecipitated proteins was stained with Coomassie Blue. The proteins extracted from the gel were subjected to Mass Spectrometry. Supplementary Fig. S3 shows that among the candidate proteins that are associated with ErbB2, one protein has a molecular weight of approximately 70 kDa. This protein was identified as mtHSP70 by Mass Spectrometry. This is an interesting finding since mtHSP70 is a key player in the classic mitochondrial importation pathway32. To verify this result, immunoprecipitation using anti-ErbB2 antibody followed by Western blotting with mtHSP70, and reverse immunoprecipitation using anti-mtHSP70 antibody followed by Western blotting with ErbB2 were performed to determine whether ErbB2 associates with mtHSP70 in MDA-MB-231/ErbB2 cells, which express exogenous ErbB2 (Fig. 2C, upper). The results showed that both proteins can be detected by Western blotting when mitochondrial proteins were immunoprecipitated with antibodies against the other protein. Similar results were obtained with SKBR3 cells (Fig. 2C, lower).
To further confirm that ErbB2 translocates into mitochondria through mtHSP70 pathway, we transfected a siRNA specific to mtHSP70 into SKBR3 cells to knockdown mtHSP70 and examined the distribution of ErbB2 in the cells by Western Blotting. Fig. 2D shows that compared to that of the control scramble siRNA transfected cells, the amount of ErbB2 in mitochondria was decreased while a relatively larger amount of ErbB2 accumulated in cytoplasm was found in the mtHSP70 siRNA transfected cells. In contrast, the protein levels of cytochrome c oxidase subunit II in mitochondria were not affected by mtHSP70 knockdown, since this protein is encoded and synthesized in mitochondria and does not participate in the mitochondrial protein importation33. Similar results were observed when we transfected SKBR3 cells with another independent siRNA to mtHSP70 (Supplementary Fig. S4). Thus, these data clearly indicate that ErbB2 translocates into mitochondria through an mtHSP70 mediated mitochondrial importation pathway.
MtErbB2 switches cancer cell metabolism
To examine whether mtErbB2 modulates mitochondrial functions, we transfected the expression vectors containing wild-type ErbB2 (ErbB2WT) and ErbB2 fused to a MTS derived from the mitochondrial electron transfer system (ETS) complex IV (ErbB2Mito) into MDA-MB-231 cells. We also constructed the expression vector containing the aa 623–689 deletion of ErbB2 (ErbB2ΔMTS) and expressed the plasmids in MDA-MB-231 cells. While the expression of ErbB2 in the whole cell lysates are similar in 231ErbB2WT, 231ErbB2Mito and 231ErbB2ΔMTS cells, the mtErbB2 expression level in ErbB2Mito cells was much higher than that of in ErbB2WT cells (approximately 20 fold measured by protein band intensity quantitation), while there was no detectable ErbB2 found in the mitochondrial fraction of 231ErbB2ΔMTS cells, indicating that the MTS signal targets ErbB2 into mitochondria (Fig. 3A). To exclude the possibility that transfection might affect mitochondrial integrity, we measured the protein expression of several components of the ETS complexes including complex I subunit NDUFB 8, complex II subunit I p (30 kD), complex III subunit core2, COX II (cytochrome c oxidase-II) and ATP Synthase F1α in these cells by immunoblotting. All these proteins were expressed in similar amounts in these cells (Supplementary Fig. S5A). In addition, the mitochondrial structure and mass of these transfectants were similar as shown by fluorescent microscopy (Supplementary Fig. S5B). The amounts of mitochondrial DNA encoded genes ND1, COX 1, COX 2 and ATP Synthase also were similar in these cells measured by real time quantitative PCR (Supplementary Fig. S5C). These results indicate that mitochondrial integrity was not affected by transfection of the ErbB2 expression vectors.
To examine whether mtErbB2 affects the respiratory function of mitochondria, we first measured oxygen consumption which is a direct indicator of mitochondrial respiration. Oxygen consumption in 231ErbB2Mito cells was decreased compared to 231V and 231ErbB2WT cells (Fig. 3B), while 231ErbB2ΔMTS cells and kinase defective mutant ErbB2 transfected cells (231ErbB2MitoKM) had no significant changes, indicating that the overall level of cellular respiration was suppressed by the mitochondrial localization of ErbB2 and the kinase activity of mtErbB2 is required for this. We next conducted assays to examine the enzyme activities of ETS complex I, II, IV, and V (ATP synthase). We found that although the proteins were expressed at similar levels (Supplementary Fig. S5A), the activities of complex I, II and IV were decreased by mtErbB2. However, the activity of complex V did not change (Fig. 3C). We next examined the mitochondrial membrane potential (ΔΨm), which reflects the efficiency of pumping of hydrogen ions across the inner membrane during the process of electron transport and oxidative phosphorylation, by detecting the aggregation of JC-1 in these cells31. We found that the mitochondrial membrane potential of 231ErbB2WT was lower than 231V, while 231ErbB2Mito was the lowest and 231ErbB2ΔMTS and 231ErbB2MitoKM cells had no significant changes (Fig. 3D). To test whether mitochondrial membrane potential changes resulted in cellular ATP level fluctuation, we measured ATP/ADP levels. The results showed that 231V, 231ErbB2WT, 231ErbB2ΔMTS and 231ErbB2MitoKM cells had a similar ATP/ADP ratio, while the ratio in 231ErbB2Mito cells was decreased (Fig. 3E). These results clearly indicate that mitochondrial localization of kinase intact ErbB2 negatively regulates the mitochondrial respiration and oxidative phosphorylation through suppressing the activities of ETS complexes.
As glycolysis and mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation are linked processes34, we reasoned that mtErbB2 may increase glycolysis in these cells. To test this, we compared glucose uptake and lactate production, two hallmarks of glycolysis, in 231V, 231ErbB2WT, 231ErbB2Mito, 231ErbB2ΔMTS, and 231ErbB2MitoKM cells. We observed that 231ErbB2Mito cells show the highest rates of glucose uptake and lactate production among these cells (Fig. 3, F and G), indicating that mtErbB2 promotes glycolysis. Taken together, these results indicate that mtErbB2 switches cancer cell metabolism from oxidative phosphorylation toward glycolysis.
MtErbB2 renders resistance to hypoxia and ETS inhibitors
To evaluate whether mtErbB2 causes functional changes in response to cell stress, we treated the cells with specific inhibitors of mitochondrial ETS complexes and glycolysis. We found that mtErbB2 renders cancer cells resistant to the ETS inhibitor Oligomycin (Fig. 4, A and B), suggesting that 231ErbB2Mito cells are dependent less upon energy supplied by oxidative phosphorylation. In contrast, 231ErbB2Mito cells were more sensitive to the glycolysis inhibitors 2-DG and Oxamate, indicating these cells are dependent more upon glycolysis (Fig. 4, A and B). These findings are consistent with the results that mtErbB2 negatively regulates cancer cell mitochondrial respiratory functions and promotes glycolysis. We next mimicked a hypoxia environment with CoCl2 treatment and examined glycolysis indicators in these cells. The results showed that the oxygen consumption of 231V, 231ErbB2WT, 231ErbB2ΔMTS and 231ErbB2MitoKM cells decreased by about 15–30%, while 231ErbB2Mito cells were insensitive to hypoxia (Fig. 4C). We also observed that under hypoxia the glucose uptake and lactate production of 231V, 231ErbB2ΔMTS and 231ErbB2MitoKM cells were sharply increased, approaching the levels of the 231ErbB2WT and 231ErbB2Mito cells (Fig. 4C), indicating that in a low oxygen environment mtErbB2 renders cancer cell dependent less upon the energy supplied by oxidative phosphorylation.
mtErbB2 increases cancer cell trastuzumab resistance
Trastuzumab (Herceptin) is a humanized monoclonal antibody, which specifically targets the extracellular domain of ErbB2 and has shown a remarkable clinical efficacy in the treatment of ErbB2-positive cancer patients. However, many patients eventually develop resistance to trastuzumab after continuous treatment. The mechanisms of this resistance have been extensively studied, yet the precise mechanism remains elusive. It has been shown that treatment with trastuzumab induces ErbB2 internalization through endocytosis. However, not all the ErbB2 withdrawn from the plasma membrane enters into endosomes and lysosomes ready for degradation35. In addition, dysregulated cellular metabolism has been reported to cause cancer cell drug resistance12,13. Thus we hypothesized that the treatment of trastuzumab would induce the translocation of the surface bound ErbB2 into mitochondria and alter cellular metabolism, which may provide a mechanism for trastuzumab resistance. Indeed, we observed a dramatic elevation of mtErbB2 in trastuzumab-resistant cells than that of parental BT474 cells by Western blotting (Fig. 5A). Trastuzumab induced the translocation of ErbB2 into mitochondria in a time dependent manner in BT474 cells (Fig. 5B & Supplementary Fig. S6A), while the total ErbB2 levels in the cells did not significantly change (Fig. 5B, right). We next explored whether mtErbB2-overexpressing cells are more resistant to trastuzumab. Fig. 5C shows that when the cells were treated with 100 ug/ml trastuzumab, 231ErbB2Mito cells were more resistant to trastuzumab compared to 231ErbB2WT, 231ErbB2ΔMTS, 231ErbB2MitoKM and 231ErbB2WT cells treated with siRNA to mtHSP70. Importantly, blocking ErbB2 translocation into mitochondria by the deletion of endogenous MTS renders 231ErbB2ΔMTS cells more sensitive to trastuzumab compared to 231ErbB2WT (P< 0.05) and 231ErbB2Mito cells (P<0.01), indicating that translocation of ErbB2 into mitochondria leads to cancer cell resistant to trastuzumab. These results reveal a novel mechanism for trastuzumab resistance in ErbB2-positive cancer cells.
Translocation of ErbB2 into mitochondria is kinase dependent
Since ErbB2 is a receptor tyrosine kinase, we wondered whether the kinase activity of ErbB2 is responsible for the translocation of ErbB2 into mitochondria. We compared the mtErbB2 in multiple MDA-MB-435 variants that express ErbB2 mutants with different tyrosine kinase activities. The 435eb expresses wild type ErbB2 (435eb), 435V659E (435VE) mutant has an enhanced kinase activity of ErbB2 and 435K753M (435KM) has one amino acid mutation within the kinase domain, showing a defective kinase activity36. The results showed that the expression of mtErbB2 in 435VE cells was much higher than 435eb, while the amount of mtErbB2 in 435K753M was the lowest (Fig. 6A). To further verify these results, we treated MCF7/ErbB2 cells with Heregulin β1 (HRG) which stimulates the dimerizaiton and activation of ErbB2 or the specific ErbB2 inhibitor AG825 which represses the kinase activity of ErbB2. Compared to those of untreated cells, MCF7/ErbB2 cells exhibited higher mtErbB2 levels when treated with HRG but decreased mtErbB2 when treated with AG825 (Fig. 6B, upper). HRG indeed increased the phosphorylation of ErbB2 while the treatment with AG825 decreased the phosphorylation although the total amount of ErbB2 in the cells was similar (Fig. 6B, lower). Similar results were also obtained from MCF7 cell line which expresses a moderate ErbB2 level. Similarly, treatment of MCF7 cells with HRG also led to an increased translocation of ErbB2 into mitochondria (Fig. 6C). We further confirmed the results by examining the activities of mtErbB2 upon trastuzumab (HCP) treatment on BT474 HCPR trastuzumab resistant cells. As shown in Supplementary Fig. S7, in trastuzumab resistant BT474 HCPR cells, HRG induced phosphorylation of mtErbB2 was not significantly inhibited by trastuzumab. This result is consistent with our previous results that translocation of ErbB2 into mitochondria is dependent on its kinase activity, which contributes to the function of mtErbB2 in regulating cellular metabolism.
We next explored mitochondrial proteins that may interact with mtErB2 and potential substrates of mtErbB2 tyrosine kinase. We isolated mitochondrial fractions from SKBR3 cells and performed immunoprecipitation with antibodies against ErbB2. An SDS-PAGE gel of the immunoprecipitated proteins was stained with Coomassie Blue. The proteins extracted from the gel were subjected to Mass Spectrometry (data not show). We found that cytochrome c oxidase II (Cox II) was among the putative binding partners of mtErbB2. To verify this result, immunoprecipitations using anti-ErbB2 antibody followed by Western blotting with Cox II, and reverse immunoprecipitations using anti-Cox II antibody followed by Western blotting with ErbB2 were performed to determine whether ErbB2 associates with Cox II in SKBR3 cells. Figure 6D (left) shows that both proteins could be detected by Western blotting when mitochondrial proteins were immunoprecipitated with antibody against the other protein, indicating the interaction between mtErbB2 and Cox II. Moreover, we found that the phosphorylation of Cox II was inversely correlated with the kinase activity of mtErbB2 by comparing the phosphorylation levels on Cox II in different ErbB2 mutants transfected MDA-MB-231 cells (Fig. 6D, right), suggesting that mtErbB2 regulates the level of tyrosine phosphorylation on Cox II through an indirect mechanism. Since phosphorylation on Cox II activates cytochrome c oxidase which leads to cytochrome c oxidation and to be released from mitochondria to trigger apoptosis37,11, we compared the cytochrome c oxidase activity among vector alone, erbB2WT, ErbB2Mito, and ErbB2MitoKM cells as previously described11. We found that mitochondrial localization of ErbB2 markedly decreased the activity of cytochrome c oxidase in an ErbB2 kinase dependent manner (Fig 6E). To examine whether mitochondrial localization of ErbB2 antagonizes apoptosis of cancer cells, we measured cytochrome c release from mitochondria into cytoplasm in these cell variants. 231V, 231ErbB2WT, 231ErbB2Mito and 231ErbB2MitoKM cells were treated with an apoptosis inducer paclitaxel (Taxol), followed by cellular organelle separation and Western Blotting. 231V and 231ErbB2MitoKM cells are sensitive to Taxol-induced apoptosis, indicated by a significant amount of cytochrome c released from mitochondria into cytoplasm. However, 231ErbB2Mito cells showed the strongest resistant to Taxol with the least releasing of cytochrome c into cytoplasm (Fig 6F), indicating that suppression of Cox II phosphorylation by mtErbB2, which subsequently leads to decreased activity of cytochrome c oxidase, reduced cytochrome c oxidation, and less cytochrome c release, contributes to the anti-apoptosis of cancer cells.
Discussion
Recent studies demonstrate that receptor tyrosine kinases can transmit intracellular signals from endosomes and other intracellular compartments, and the precise subcellular location can define signaling specificity in a manner that is not yet understood38. Mitochondria have been considered not merely the “powerhouses” of the cell, but also a critical organelle with diverse cellular functions. Mitochondria have crucial roles in apoptosis, reactive oxygen species production, and numerous other metabolic processes. Here we report a novel localization of ErbB2 in mitochondria in ErbB2-positive cancer cells and patient samples. This intriguing discovery may open a new avenue for studying the normal and cancerous roles of ErbB2, which may lead to more effective therapeutics for cancer treatment. Moreover, we identified the endogenous mitochondrial targeting sequence of ErbB2 and the association of ErbB2 with mitochondrial transportation protein mtHSP70. Both deletion of the endogenous mitochondrial targeting sequence and downregulation of mtHSP70 blocked the translocation of ErbB2 into mitochondria, suggesting the translocation is physiologically relevant.
By immunoprecipitation and mass spectrometry, we validated the interaction of mtErbB2 with Cox II. We observed that the level of phosphorylation on Cox II was inversely correlated with the kinase activity of mtErbB2, suggesting that kinase active mtErbB may activate a phosphatase in mitochondria to de-phosphorylate Cox II. Alternatively, mtErbB2 may lead to de-association of Cox II from a tyrosine kinase that directly phosphorylates Cox II. These results indicate that mtErbB2 may regulate the components of ETS, thus leads to the alteration of mitochondrial function. However, our available data could not exclude the possibility that mtErbB2 regulates mitochondrial respiration through an indirect mechanism. Further investigations are needed on the precise mechanism for how mtErbB2 regulates cancer cell metabolism. It has been reported that EGFR increases glucose uptake independent of its kinase activity39. However, we observed that the translocation of ErbB2 into mitochondria is facilitated by ErbB2 tyrosine kinase activation, implying that mtErbB2 phosphorylates substrates in mitochondria to trigger signaling cascades and regulates mitochondrial function.
In our previous studies we found that in breast cancer cells, ErbB2 promotes glycolysis at least partially through the heat shock factor 1 (HSF1)-mediated upregulation of LDH-A23. Moreover, trastuzumab inhibits glycolysis via downregulation of HSF1 and LDH-A in ErbB2-positive cancer cells; increased glycolysis contributes to trastuzumab resistance, and targeting glycolysis increases the sensibility of cancer cells to trastuzumab13. In the current study we found that ErbB2 translocates into mitochondria and negatively regulates the respiration function. Collectively, these results suggest that ErbB2 not only promotes glycolysis by up-regulating glycolytic enzyme LDH-A, but also inhibits mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation. Both effects of ErbB2 on cellular metabolism drive ErbB2-overexpressing cancer cells toward a Warburg Effect-like phenotype. This may explain ErbB2-overexpressing cancer cell’s high capacity to adapt and survive stressful conditions.
In summary, our studies demonstrate that a significant amount of ErbB2 is located in mitochondria in cancer cells and patient samples. We found that the translocation of ErbB2 into mitochondria is through a classic mitochondria translocation pathway facilitated by mtHSP70. Moreover, we found that mtErbB2 regulates mitochondrial respiratory functions and switches the energy dependency of cancer cells from oxidative phosphorylation to aerobic glycolysis. Importantly, we have provided evidence to support that the translocation of ErbB2 into mitochondria is a novel mechanism for trastuzumab resistance. These findings raise important questions such as: What is the detailed mechanism of mtErbB2 regulating the respiratory function of mitochondria? What are the implications of mtErbB2 in cancer development and therapeutics? Answers to these questions will not only solve an intriguing problem for the field of cancer biology, but more importantly, they may lead to the discovery of a novel biomarker and a therapeutic target for breast and other cancers.
Methods
Cell lines and cell cultures
Human breast cancer cells MCF7, MDA-MB-435, MDA-MB-231, SKBR3, BT474 cells were purchased from the American Type Culture Collection; BT474 and its trastuzumab resistant variants were gifts from Dr. Rita Nahta from Emory University. The cells were cultured in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM)/F-12 (Mediatech Inc., Manassas, VA, USA) with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) in a 5% CO2 and 37 °C incubator.
Antibodies and Reagents
The antibodies were purchased from: ErbB2 (OP15, Calbiochem), mtHSP70 (MA3-028, Thermo Scientific), VDAC1 (sc-58649, Santa Cruz), Bcl-2 (Rabbit mAb #2870, Cell Signaling), Integrin β (610467, BD Bioscience), Prohibitin (EP2803Y, Abcam), KDEL (sc-33806, Santa Cruz), EEA1(sc-130017, Santa Cruz), Golgi Complex (NB37-10UG, Calbiochem), LAMP2 (sc-18822, Santa Cruz), Lamin B1 (MA1-06103, Thermo Scientific), Mitochondrial Complex I subunit NDUFB8, Complex II subunit 30kDa, Complex III subunit Core 2, Complex IV subunit II, and ATP synthase subunit alpha antibodies mix were MitoProfile® Total OXPHOS Human WB Antibody Cocktail (MS601, Mitoscience). siRNAs for mtHSP70(1) (SASI_Hs01_00216924) and mtHSP70(2) (MISSION® siRNA SASI_Hs01_00216923) were purchased from Sigma. Protease K was purchased from Sigma; the immunoprecipitation assay was conducted using Pierce Co-immunoprecipitation Kit (Cat: 26149) from Thermo Scientific. Mitotracker was purchased from Invitrogen; Intact mitochondria were prepared and purified using Qproteome Mitochondria Isolation Kit from Qiagen; ADP/ATP assay kit was purchased from BioVison; Oxygen Consumption assay kit was from BD Bioscience and Mitochondrial Complex activity assay kits (I, II, IV and V) were purchased from Mitoscience. Mitochondrial membrane potential kit was purchased from BD™ MitoScreen (JC-1); Glucose uptake was measured using the Amplex Red Glucose/Glucose Oxidase Assay Kit (Molecular Probes, Carlsbad, CA, USA); Lactate production in the medium was detected by using the Lactate Assay Kit (BioVision, Mountain View, CA, USA).
Protease K sensitivity
Protease sensitivity experiments were conducted with the incubation of intact mitochondria with Proteinase K at 10 ug/ml in the presence or absence of 1% triton X-100. After a 10-min’s incubation at room temperature, reactions were stopped by adding Phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride to a final concentration of 2 mM to stop the reactions. Samples were loaded onto SDS-PAGE and subjected to Western Blotting analysis.
Fluorescence and immunofluorescence Microscopy
Cells were plated in a 6-well plate on cover glass and cultured overnight. Mitochondria was stained with Mitotracker-Green/Red (Invitrogen) at 100 nM for 30 min, cells were fixed and incubated with primary antibody ErbB2 (mouse) overnight, followed by the incubation of Monoclonal mouse Anti-Cy3 antibody (red) or FITC (green). Images were captured with a Nikon Eclipse TE2000-E microscope and were analyzed using Nikon NIS-Elements Advanced Research software.
Immunotransmission electron microscopy
Cancer cells were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde and0.1% glutaraldehyde in 100 mM phosphate buffer (PB) (pH 7.4)for 30 min, followed by 1% paraformaldehyde in PB at 4°C overnight. The samples were then treatedin 0.1% sodium borohydride in PB for 15 min, permeabilized with 0.05% Triton 100X in PB, and blocked with 5% bovine serum albumin (BSA), 0.1% cold water fish skin gelatin, and 5% normal goat serum in phosphate buffer saline (PBS) for 60 min, The primary antibody(mouse anti ErbB2) incubation was done overnight at 4°C in PBS containing 0.1% BSA-c. Cells were then rinsed six times with PBS containing 0.1%BSA-c, and incubated with the ultrasmall gold conjugated secondary antibody (Aurion; Wageningen, The Netherlands) in PBS containing 0.1% BSA-c overnight at 4°C. Afterward, thesamples were rinsed and postfixed with 2.0% glutaraldehyde followed by rinses with PB and the Enhancement Conditioning Solution (ECS, Aurion). For silver enhancement, sections were agitated in Aurion R-gent SE-EM at room temperature for 2 hours and then rinsed in ECS solution again. After additions rinses in PB, samples were processed and embedded in Epon resin according to standard procedures.
Vectors construction
Vectors containing wild type ErbB2 and ErbB2 plus a mitochondrial targeting sequence (MTS) were constructed. WT-ErbB2 vector was constructed using pEF/myc/cyto vector from Invitrogen. MTS-ErbB2 and MTS-ErbB2-K753M vectors constructed using pEF/myc/mito vector from Invitrogen. The mitochondrial targeting sequence from the pEF/myc/mito is: MSVLTPLLLRGLTGSARRLPVPRAIHSL. Briefly, ErbB2-wt and ErbB2 (K753M) CDS were amplified by PCR from plasmids pCDNA3-ErbB2-wt or pcDNA3-ErbB2-KD (K753M) with primers: ErbB2 Forward: TGACTCGAGGAGCTGGCGGCCTTGTGCCGCT; ErbB2 Reverse: TGAGCGGCCGCCACTGGCACGTCCAGACCCAGG. PCR products were digested with XhoI and NotI and cloned into pEF/myc/cyto or pEF/myc/mito. The pCDNA3-ErbB2-wt was amplified by primers to make ErbB2WTΔMTS (deletion of endogenous MTS: 623–689aa): Forward primer: GATGAGGAGGGCGCATGCCTGCAGGAAACGGAGCTG; Reverse primer: CAGCTCCGTTTCCTGCAGGCATGCGCCCTCCTCATC. PCR products were digested with DpnI and transformed into competitive cells, and MTS deletion was verified by DNA sequencing. Fragments encoding amino acids of ErbB2 juxtamembrane region (aa 646–689), transmembrane domain (aa 623–645) and GFP plus transmembrane domain fused with juxtamembrane region (aa 623–689) were PCR amplified from pcDNA3-ErbB2-wt, cloned between the EcoRI and BamHI sites of phrGFP-C vector (Stratagene, La Jolla, CA). All constructs were sequenced before use. Plasmid DNA was isolated and transfected into MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cells using Oligofectamin 2000 reagents from Invitrogen in a 6-well dish. After 24 h, the cells were transferred into 10 cm dishes containing media (DMEM)/F-12 containing 10% fetal bovine serum and 1.8 mg/ml GENETICIN. Stable clones were selected and verified by western blotting.
Oxygen Consumption
Oxygen consumption was detected using BD Oxygen Biosensor Systems from BD Bioscience Company. 1×106 cells were plated into a 96-well plate provided with the kit. The plates were read for Fluorescence using the following parameters: 485 nm excitation and 630 nm emission. Raw data was analyzed and normalized according to the kit instruction. Each sample was plated in triplicate and each experiment was repeated three times to reach the statistical significance.
Mitochondrial Complex Activity Assays
The activity of mitochondrial respiration complexes in the Electron Transfer Chain was assayed according to the manufacturer’s protocol using a kit from Mitoscience Company. Specifically, we used mitochondrial Complex I Enzyme Activity Microplate Assay Kit (MS141); Complex II Enzyme Activity Microplate Assay Kit (MS241); Complex IV Human Enzyme Activity Microplate Assay Kit (MS441); ATP synthase Enzyme Activity Microplate Assay Kit (MS541). Briefly, cancer cells which were stably transfected with ErbB2WT, ErbB2Mito and empty vectors were cultured and total proteins were isolated and subjected to centrifugation at different speeds using lysis buffer/detergents from the kit. The supernatant was incubated in a 96-well microplate with a monoclonal antibody (specific to complex I, II, III and IV accordingly) pre-bound to the wells. After 2–3 h incubation in room temperature, substrates provided from the kit were added into the wells and the absorbance (OD) was measured in Spectrophotometer for 30mins to 2 h according to the different complex reactions. Raw data was analyzed according to the formulas from the protocol. The rate of the reaction was calculated as the complex activity.
Glucose uptake assay
Cells were seeded in 24-well plates at 5×105 cells/well. Culture media were collected at 4 and 8 h and stored at −20 °C until assayed. Glucose uptake was measured using the Amplex Red Glucose/Glucose Oxidase Assay Kit (Molecular Probes, Carlsbad, CA, USA). Absorbance was measured at 563 nm using a SpectraMax M5 plate reader (Molecular Devices, Sunnyvate, CA, USA) and results were normalized on the basis of the total protein amounts of the cells.
Lactate production assay
Lactate production in the medium was detected using a Lactate Assay Kit (BioVision, Mountain View, CA, USA). Results were normalized on the basis of the total protein amounts of the cells.
Detection of ATP/ADP ratio
The ATP/ADP ratios cancer cells were assayed using ApoSENSOR ADP/ATP Ratio Assay Kit from BioVision (Catalog #K255-200). Cells were cultured and collected. Briefly, 10 μl of the cultured cells (1×103–1×104) were transferred into luminometer plate and 100 μl of the Nucleotide Releasing Buffer was added. To measure the ATP levels in the cells, 1 μl of the ATP Monitoring Enzyme was added into the cell lysate. The samples were read within 1 min in a luminometer (Data A). To measure ADP levels in the cells, the samples were read after 10 min (Data B), and then 1 μl of ADP Converting Enzyme was added. The samples were read again within 1 min in a luminometer (Data C). The ATP/ADP ratio will be calculated as: Data A/(Data C – Data B).
Detection of Mitochondrial Membrane Potential
Mitochondrial membrane potential was detected using a kit from BD™ MitoScreen (JC-1) according to the manufacturer’s instruction.
Mitochondrial Targeting Sequence Prediction
Mitochondrial Targeting Sequence was predicted by the online program: http://psort.ims.u-tokyo.ac.jp/form2.html
Cytochrome c oxidase activity assay
The cytochrome c oxidase activity assays were performed using the kit from Sigma (CYTOCOX1 cytochrome c oxidase Assay Kit), according to the manufacturer’s instruction.
Statistical analysis
The unpaired Student’s t-test was used for the data analysis. All data was shown as mean ± standard error (SE). A statistical difference of P < 0.05 was considered significant.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments
We thank Dr. Lynn D Dyess for patient samples; Dr. Rita Nahta for the trastuzumab-resistant cells, and Ms. Amy Brown for editorial assistance. We are grateful to the support from The Vincent F. Kilborn, Jr. Cancer Research Foundation (M. Tan), Institutes of Health Grant RO1CA149646 (M. Tan) and The Radiumhospitalets Legater Project 334003 (M. Tan and O. Fodstad).
Footnotes
Author Contributions
Y.D. and M.T. designed research; Y.D., Z.L., H.Y., E.R.W., S.D., and L.K.P. performed research; Y.D., Z.L., Y.Z., H.L., and M.T. analyzed data; and Y.D., L.B.O., W.D., O.F., S.P.L., G.L.W., J.L. and M.T. wrote or revised the manuscript.
Supplementary Information: Accompanies this paper at http://www.nature.com/naturecommunications
Competing financial interests: The authors declare no competing financial interests.
References
- 1.Warburg O. On respiratory impairment in cancer cells. Science. 1956;124:269–270. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Kim JW, Dang CV. Cancer’s molecular sweet tooth and the Warburg effect. Cancer Res. 2006;66:8927–30. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-06-1501. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Chen Z, Lu WQ, Garcia-Prieto C, Huang P. The Warburg effect and its cancer therapeutic implications. J Bioenerg Biomembr. 2007;39:267–274. doi: 10.1007/s10863-007-9086-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Gatenby RA, Gillies RJ. Glycolysis in cancer: a potential target for therapy. Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 2007;39:1358–66. doi: 10.1016/j.biocel.2007.03.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.DeBerardinis RJ, Lum JJ, Hatzivassiliou G, Thompson CB. The biology of cancer: metabolic reprogramming fuels cell growth and proliferation. Cell Metab. 2008;7:11–20. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2007.10.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Gillies RJ, Robey I, Gatenby RA. Causes and consequences of increased glucose metabolism of cancers. J Nucl Med. 2008;49(Suppl 2):24S–42S. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.107.047258. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Hsu PP, Sabatini DM. Cancer cell metabolism: Warburg and beyond. Cell. 2008;134:703–7. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2008.08.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Kroemer G, Pouyssegur J. Tumor cell metabolism: cancer’s Achilles’ heel. Cancer Cell. 2008;13:472–82. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2008.05.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Vander Heiden MG, Cantley LC, Thompson CB. Understanding the Warburg effect: the metabolic requirements of cell proliferation. Science. 2009;324:1029–33. doi: 10.1126/science.1160809. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Galluzzi L, Larochette N, Zamzami N, Kroemer G. Mitochondria as therapeutic targets for cancer chemotherapy. Oncogene. 2006;25:4812–30. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1209598. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Vaughn AE, Deshmukh M. Glucose metabolism inhibits apoptosis in neurons and cancer cells by redox inactivation of cytochrome c. Nat Cell Biol. 2008;10:1477–1483. doi: 10.1038/ncb1807. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Zhou M, et al. Warburg effect in chemosensitivity: Targeting lactate dehydrogenase-A re-sensitizes Taxol-resistant cancer cells to Taxol. Molecular Cancer. 2010;9:9–33. doi: 10.1186/1476-4598-9-33. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Zhao Y, et al. Overcoming trastuzumab resistance in breast cancer by targeting dysregulated glucose metabolism. Cancer Res. 2011;1:4585–97. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-11-0127. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Slamon DJ, et al. Studies of the HER-2/neu proto-oncogene in human breast and ovarian cancer. Science. 1989;244:707–12. doi: 10.1126/science.2470152. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Guy CT, et al. Expression of the neu protooncogene in the mammary epithelium of transgenic mice induces metastatic disease. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1992;89:10578–82. doi: 10.1073/pnas.89.22.10578. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Tan M, Yao J, Yu D. Overexpression of the c-erbB-2 gene enhanced intrinsic metastasis potential in human breast cancer cells without increasing their transformation abilities. Cancer Res. 1997;57:1199–205. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Tan M, et al. ErbB2 promotes Src synthesis and stability: novel mechanisms of Src activation that confer breast cancer metastasis. Cancer Res. 2005;65:1858–67. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-04-2353. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Tan M, et al. Selective inhibition of ErbB2-overexpressing breast cancer in vivo by a novel TAT-based ErbB2-targeting signal transducers and activators of transcription 3-blocking peptide. Cancer Res. 2006a;66:3764–72. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-05-2747. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Tan M, et al. Upregulation and activation of PKC alpha by ErbB2 through Src promotes breast cancer cell invasion that can be blocked by combined treatment with PKC alpha and Src inhibitors. Oncogene. 2006b;25:3286–95. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1209361. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Yarden Y, Sliwkowski MX. Untangling the ErbB signalling network. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2001;2:127–37. doi: 10.1038/35052073. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Zhou X, et al. Activation of the Akt/mammalian target of rapamycin/4E-BP1 pathway by ErbB2 overexpression predicts tumor progression in breast cancers. Clin Cancer Res. 2004;10:6779–88. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-04-0112. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Zhang H, et al. ErbB receptors: from oncogenes to targeted cancer therapies. J Clin Invest. 2007;117:2051–8. doi: 10.1172/JCI32278. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Zhao YH, et al. Upregulation of lactate dehydrogenase A by ErbB2 through heat shock factor 1 promotes breast cancer cell glycolysis and growth. Oncogene. 2009;28:3689–701. doi: 10.1038/onc.2009.229. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Wang SC, Hung MC. Nuclear translocation of the epidermal growth factor receptor family membrane tyrosine kinase receptors. Clin Cancer Res. 2009;15:6484–9. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-08-2813. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Sun Y, et al. Induction or suppression of expression of cytochrome c oxidase subunit II by heregulin beta 1 in human mammary epithelial cells is dependent on the levels of ErbB2 expression. J Cell Physiol. 2002;192:225–33. doi: 10.1002/jcp.10132. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Grazette LP, et al. Inhibition of ErbB2 causes mitochondrial dysfunction in cardiomyocytes: implications for herceptin-induced cardiomyopathy. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004;44:2231–8. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2004.08.066. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Lasfer M, et al. Protein kinase PKC delta and c-Abl are required for mitochondrial apoptosis induction by genotoxic stress in the absence of p53, p73 and Fas receptor. FEBS Lett. 2006;580:2547–52. doi: 10.1016/j.febslet.2006.03.089. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Tibaldi E, et al. Src-Tyrosine kinases are major agents in mitochondrial tyrosine phosphorylation. J Cell Biochem. 2008;104:840–9. doi: 10.1002/jcb.21670. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Baines CP, et al. Mitochondrial PKCepsilon and MAPK form signaling modules in the murine heart: enhanced mitochondrial PKCepsilon-MAPK interactions and differential MAPK activation in PKCepsilon-induced cardioprotection. Circ Res. 2002;90:390–7. doi: 10.1161/01.res.0000012702.90501.8d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Arachiche A, et al. Localization of PTP-1B, SHP-2, and Src exclusively in rat brain mitochondria and functional consequences. J Biol Chem. 2008;283:24406–11. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M709217200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Miedlich SU, Zalutskaya A, Zhu ED, Demay MB. Phosphate-induced apoptosis of hypertrophic chondrocytes is associated with a decrease in mitochondrial membrane potential and is dependent upon ERK1/2 phosphorylation. J Biol Chem. 2010;24:18270–18275. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M109.098616. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Neupert W, Herrmann JM. Translocation of Proteins into Mitochondria. Annual Review of Biochemistry. 2007;76:723–749. doi: 10.1146/annurev.biochem.76.052705.163409. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Chacinska A, et al. Importing Mitochondrial Proteins: Machineries and Mechanism. Cell. 2009;138:628–644. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2009.08.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Fantin VR, St-Pierre J, Leder P. Attenuation of LDH-A expression uncovers a link between glycolysis, mitochondrial physiology, and tumor maintenance. Cancer Cell. 2006;9:425–34. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2006.04.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Austin CD, et al. Endocytosis and Sorting of ErbB2 and the Site of Action of Cancer Therapeutics Trastuzumab and Geldanamycin. Molecular Biology of the Cell. 2004;15:5268–5282. doi: 10.1091/mbc.E04-07-0591. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Tan M, et al. Phosphorylation on tyrosine-15 of p34 (Cdc2) by ErbB2 inhibits p34(Cdc2) activation and is involved in resistance to taxol-induced apoptosis. Mol Cell. 2002;9:993–1004. doi: 10.1016/s1097-2765(02)00510-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Miyazaki T, et al. Regulation of cytochrome c oxidase activity by c-Src in osteoclasts. J Cell Biol. 2003;160:709–18. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200209098. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Lemmon MA, Schlessinger J. Cell Signaling by Receptor Tyrosine Kinases. Cell. 2010;141:1117–1134. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2010.06.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Weihua Z, et al. Survival of cancer cells is maintained by EGFR independent of its kinase activity. Cancer Cell. 2008;13:385–93. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2008.03.015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.