Skip to main content
International Journal of Health Sciences logoLink to International Journal of Health Sciences
. 2011 Jul;5(2):156–165.

Effectiveness of Submucosal Dexamethasone to Control Postoperative Pain & Swelling in Apicectomy of Maxillary Anterior Teeth

Shahzad Ali Shah 1,, Irfanullah Khan 1, Humera Shahzad Shah 1
PMCID: PMC3521834  PMID: 23267293

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of submucosal dexamethasone injection to control postoperative pain and swelling in apicectomy of maxillary anterior teeth.

Methods

A randomized, controlled trial comprising 60 adult patients (68.3% male, 31.7% female) with no local or systemic problems was conducted. Patients were randomly divided into two groups: Group A was given 4mg dexamethasone injection perioperatively. Group B (control group) was treated conventionally without any steroid injection. Postoperative pain and swelling was evaluated using a visual analog scale (VAS). Objective measurements of facial pain and swelling were performed daily up to six days postoperatively.

Results

Dexamethasone group showed significant reduction in pain and swelling postoperatively compared with the control.

Conclusion

Submucosal dexamethasone 4mg injection is an effective therapeutic strategy for swift and comfortable improvement after surgical procedure and has a significant effect on reducing postoperative pain and swelling. The treatment offers a simple, safe, painless, noninvasive and cost effective therapeutic option for moderate and severe cases.

Keywords: Pain control, dexamethasone injection, swelling, apicectomy

Introduction

Among dental treatments, oral surgical procedures cause the most pain. (1) During these procedures; damage caused to soft and hard tissues leads to an inflammatory reaction. This reaction can occur during and after surgical procedure following damage to the tissue. Tissue changes occur through endogenous biological mediators that are released from the blood cells and damaged tissue during inflammation. These include histamine, serotonin, kinin, and prostaglandin.2

When a patient is to decide whether or not to have oral surgery, the dentist should be able to provide information on the expected discomfort during and after the operation. It has been demonstrated that pain following periapical surgery tends to peak on the operational day (35) whereas swelling is the most pronounced 1 to 2 days post operatively. (6) Postoperative discomfort was found in some studies to be associated with tooth group, patient’s expectation of pain, patient’s gender, and age, while some other studies did not find a relationship between postoperative discomfort and gender or age. (67)

Most studies have found that non prescriptive analgesics are sufficient to control postoperative pain after apicectomy, however some studies have recommended the use of steroids to minimize pain and swelling. (35) Oral dexamethasone reduces pain and swelling following oral surgical procedures. For several decades, dental surgeons have administered corticosteroids before or just after third molars surgery to reduce inflammation and associated symptoms. (8) Corticosteroids act by inhibiting, through a variety of proposed mechanisms, the body’s inflammatory response to injury, with a reduction of fluid transudation and, therefore, edema. 9 The use of corticosteroids has gained wide acceptance in the oral and maxillofacial surgery community, and numerous reports are now available supporting the use of systemic corticosteroids in the setting of third molar surgery. (1016) Recent meta-analytical studies have concluded that perioperative administration of corticosteroids has a mild to moderate value in reducing postoperative inflammatory signs and symptoms. Several studies have demonstrated a better effect in the control of the swelling trismus when using steroid anti-inflammatory drugs versus non steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. (1721)

However, clinical use of steroids should be moderate and rational, and for limited time and dose; according to endocrinology analyses, after the 5th day of steroid use, therapy has already begun to produce immunosuppresion, from which some patients may take up to 9 months to return to normal levels. (22)

Schmelzeisen and Frolich (23) found that dexamethasone administered orally, preoperatively, and postoperatively reduced pain by 50%, and postoperative analgesic needs by 37% in patients who had osteotomy of impacted molars. In a double-blind study, Pedersen (14) examined the effect of preventive dexamethasone on pain and swelling after removal of an impacted mandibular molar. Postoperative pain was reduced by 30%. In a randomized double-blind study, Baxendale et al (24) examined the effect of a single prophylactic dose of oral dexamethasone, 8 mg, on postoperative complications after extraction of third molars and found a significant reduction in pain.

Most studies of postoperative pain in oral surgery are based on the extraction of impacted teeth (2526) and the placement of dental implants. (27) Very few studies have involved periapical surgery. However, the conclusions drawn from the extraction and implant studies should be applicable to periapical surgery.

In these studies, it was shown that submucosal injection of decadron 4mg (Dxamethasone, Dexa-Allvoran; TAD Pharma GmbH, Legmo, Germany) showed significant improvement in swelling, pain, and improving the recovery phase of the patient after surgical endodontic procedure. It offers a simple, painless, less-invasive, and cost-effective approach to reduce the postoperative sequelae. However, additional studies are needed to confirm the effectiveness of locally administered corticosteroids in surgical procedures under local anesthesia. Larger patient samples are also needed to evaluate the potential adverse effects of locally applied corticosteroids on wound healing after surgery.

The aim of this randomized controlled trial was to evaluate the effect of dexamethasone injection (submucosal) on patient’s quality of life in the immediate postoperative period requiring surgical endodontic treatment in maxillary anterior teeth. The study sought to determine whether among patients receiving a 4-mg submucosal injection of dexamethasone compared to those having no dexamethasone would have better postoperative outcomes in terms of pain & swelling. A study hypothesis was formed stating that “submucosal dexamethasone injection provides reduction in pain and swelling of apicectomy of maxillary anterior teeth when compared with no such intervention.”

Material and methods

Patients with periapical radiolucency on a root-filled tooth were examined. Each patient fulfilling the inclusion criteria was selected from the OPD of the Punjab Dental Hospital, Punjab, Pakistan from January 2006 to February 2007. The inclusion criteria for the study were the following: an incisor or canine with a sufficient orthograde root filling regarding length and density and with a periapical lesion persisting for at least 2 years.

Patients, who were pregnant, had a history of drug or alcohol abuse and who were suffering from renal, hepatic and hemorrhagic diseases were excluded. Other criteria for selection included no current medication specifically steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for the last two weeks and no history of steroid medication complication.

Marginal bone level around the tooth in question should be reduced no more than 50%. All registrations were performed on a periapical radiograph taken with the paralleling technique and at a successive clinical examination.

They were given written and verbal information about the study, and a consent form was signed before participation. Neither the patients nor the operator were blinded to the use of corticosteroids. There was no financial inducement to participate, and patients were given the opportunity to withdraw from the study at any time. The study was approved by the regional Committee of Ethics.

A standardized surgical procedure was performed in all patients by the author. A standard infiltration anesthesia was given using 1.8-mL cartridges of 2% lidocaine hydrochloride with epinephrine 1:100,000. Surgical access was routinely achieved labially through a submarginal (Oscheinbein lubke) incision. Bone removal, if necessary around the tooth was then performed with a round bur on a straight hand-piece under continuous irrigation with a normal saline solution.

After root end resection and retrograde restoration, the area was inspected, copiously irrigated, and the flap was sutured back by 3 to 4 interrupted stitches using a 4–0 silk suture. A small gauze pack was then applied to the surgical site, and the usual post surgical instructions were given to the patient.

Sixty patients (19 women and 41 men), average age 28.75 years (range 14–50) were randomly divided into 2 groups, with 30 patients in each. Group A received 4 mg decadron (Dexa-Allvoran; TAD Pharma GmbH, Legmo, Germany) as a submucosal injection immediately after surgery. It was injected into the labial vestibule near the surgical site. In the second group (control), the patients received no corticosteroid treatment.

Apart from dexamethasone treatment, all patients in the study routinely received amoxicillin (oral 500 mg every 8 hours) for 5 days after surgery. In addition, a chlorhexidine mouth rinse was prescribed twice daily to be started the day after surgery for 5 days.

Facial swelling and pain were objectively measured once daily for six postoperative days by an independent examiner. Swelling on the operated side was measured as follows: (6) none (no inflammation), mild (intraoral swelling confined to the surgical field), moderate (extra oral swelling in the surgical zone), or intense (extraoral swelling spreading beyond the surgical zone).

Postoperative pain was evaluated using a visual analog scale, 100 mm in length, ranging from 0 for “no pain” to 100 for “the worst possible pain.” (7)

Pain and swelling were recorded by the surgeon once daily during the first two days after surgery, and by the patient once daily for the remaining 4 days of observation.

The data was incrementally entered during the course of study into an electronic sheet (Excel; Microsoft, Windows 2006, Redmond, WA) and then processed using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences, version 15 (SPSS, Chicago, IL) and analyzed.

Descriptive statistics were calculated. The variables analyzed include demographic (age, sex), VAS for pain and swelling. The age was presented as Mean ± SD. The frequency and intensity were calculated as percentages for each age group. Variance homogeneity was verified in each case, with calculation of the corresponding percentage variance in those cases where the results were found to be significant, and the application of non parametric tests as required. Statistical significance was considered for P less than or equal to .05.

Results

The mean patient age (41 men and 19 women) was 28.7 ± 9.5 years (range 14 to 50). No data were missing, and all patients included in the present study attended all study visits. At follow-up, no cases of alveolar osteitis or wound infection were reported. No side effects of the drugs used in the trial were mentioned or noted.

In both groups, pain and swelling were most severe on postoperative day 1 & 2 and decreased gradually through the subsequent evaluation points to approximately reach the preoperative measures by the sixth day. Pain (using the visual analog scale) was worse on day 1 and had decreased completely by day 6.

In group A, 1 out of 30 patients (3.3%) had severe pain on 1st day. In control group B, 11 patients (36.6%) were having severe pain. There is a statistically significant difference between VAS score for pain on 1st day (P = .004), 4th day (P = .004) and 6th day (p=.02) postoperatively. (Table 2)

Table 2.

Postoperative swelling in the patients of group A & B

Postoperative swelling Groups
Level of swelling Patients with Preoperative Dexamethasone Patients without Preoperative Dexamethasone P-value

Day 1 No inflammation 0 0 .00

Mild swelling 24 11

Moderate swelling 6 18

Severe swelling 0 1

Day 2 No inflammation 0 0 .00

Mild swelling 19 2

Moderate swelling 11 20

Severe swelling 0 8

Day 3 No inflammation 6 0 .00

Mild swelling 24 18

Moderate swelling 0 12

Severe swelling 0 0

Day 4 No inflammation 19 14 .29

Mild swelling 11 16

Moderate swelling 0 0

Severe swelling 0 0

Day 5 No inflammation 28 25 .42

Mild swelling 2 5

Moderate swelling 0 0

Severe swelling 0 0

Day 6 No inflammation 30 28 .49

Mild swelling 0 2

Moderate swelling 0 0

Severe swelling 0 0
*

Mild swelling: swelling confined to surgical site

**

Moderate swelling: Extraoral swelling in surgical zone

***

Severe swelling: extraoral swelling beyond surgical zone

Swelling peaked on 2nd day postoperatively in control group in which 20 patients (66.6%) were having moderate swelling and 8 patients (26.6%) having swelling extending beyond surgical site. 11 (36.6%) Patients in group A showed moderate swelling. There is a statistically significant difference observed for postoperative swelling on 1 day (P = .003), 2nd day (p= .01), and 3rd day (P = .00) (Table 2).

Discussion

The main results of our study were that submucosal injections of 4 mg dexamethasone perioperatively resulted in significant improvement in swelling and pain measures in the immediate postoperative period compared with control. The response rate to the study was high, indicating the high feasibility of using patient-centered outcome measures in oral surgery.

Post-surgical pain and facial swelling affects the daily life of the patient. Many authors have advocated the use of corticosteroids to limit postoperative pain & edema due to their suppressive action on transudation (8, 28) but few have made definitive recommendations supported by randomized clinical trials (29) Kvist and Reit (30) reported that on the evening after endodontic surgical procedure using a traditional technique, nearly all patients experienced pain, with 67% requiring analgesics. None of the patients remained at home because of the pain. However, 23% reported absence from work because of swelling and tissue discoloration. No measures were taken to reduce postoperative symptoms in the aforementioned studies.

Oral surgeons have been using corticosteroids to minimize these sequelae and have obtained satisfactory results. (3133) Corticosteroids are successful in controlling acute inflammation by interfering with the multiple signaling pathways involved in the inflammatory response. (34) The primary mechanisms are thought to involve suppression of leukocyte and macrophage accumulation at the site of inflammation, and prevention of prostaglandin formation through the disruption of the arachidonic acid cascade (35) Dexamethasone has been extensively used in oral surgery due to its high potency and long half life (36, 41) Several different routes and times of administration (e.g., intravenous and intramuscular; preoperative and perioperative) have been recently advocated because of limited benefits when the therapy was applied postoperatively. Clinicians would therefore benefit from knowing whether it is clinically relevant during surgery to use an effective perioperative steroid therapy. Patients would also not incur the risk of pharmacological over-treatment or side effects. Despite the frequent clinical use of dexamethasone, the post-surgical efficacy of either intra-alveolar or sub-mucosal perioperative administration remains poorly investigated.

In the present study, VAS score was used to assess pain, which in previous studies has been found to be a valid recording scale. (42, 29) A VAS for pain intensity is generally easily understood by patients. This method has been reported to be simple to administer, reliable, and valid. (43)

The role of corticosteroids in preventing postsurgical pain is controversial. Corticosteroids alone do not seem to have a clinically significant analgesic effect but it has been reported that steroids can be related to a reduction in the number of analgesic tablets used after surgical extractions. Dexamethasone in particular appears to decrease pain after surgery. (28, 29) for more than 30 years, glucocorticosteroids have been used in an attempt to minimize or prevent postoperative sequelae after surgical removal of impacted third molars. Several studies have been published in the literature on this subject. (21) Most studies have reported that steroids significantly reduce the pain, swelling and trismus while a few has not shown any benefit from the administration of steroids. (44) However, it is clear that the type and the dose of steroids, as well as the duration and route of administration, can have a significant impact on the efficacy of the agent.

In the present study, VAS scores for pain peaked on 1st and 2nd day of surgery. There is a good correspondence between the present findings for pain intensity and previous studies that have used VAS scores, even though these studies were conducted in 5 countries over a period of 20 years. Furthermore, it suggests that pain may not be the main factor for postoperative discomfort. (1, 3, 4)

The decision as to which route of administration to be chosen depends on the clinician’s expertise and preference. Orally administered glucocorticoids are rapidly and almost completely absorbed therefore repeated dose is required to maintain adequate blood concentration throughout the immediate postoperative period. (11) Intravenous route offers instantaneous blood levels but requires expertise and additional armamentarium. (3, 7, 12) Studies of intramuscular and intraregional doses suggest that this route of administration can be effective in a single dose given either preoperatively or postoperatively. (6, 13)

These results imply that with intraregional administration, the repository is significant throughout the first six postoperative days and that additional doses may not be necessary. In the present study, dexamethasone was selected since it is potent, cause minimal sodium retention and has interminable biological potency.

The investigations in our study indicate that intraregional dexamethasone tested was more effective in reducing the pain and swelling as compared to the patients without steroid injection. Pain was at the maximum on the first day which is in contrast to the study conducted by penarrocha, (6) Christiansen (41) as well as by Al khateeb et al. (45) Swelling was at a maximum on the second postoperative day and lasted for 4–5 days in group A & B corresponding to the study conducted by christiansen but in contrast to the results presented by penarrocha. The VAS score for pain peaked on 1st day postoperatively in group B in which 11 patients (36.6%) having severe pain compared to group A in which 1 patient (3.3%) had severe pain. There was a statistically significant difference between VAS score for pain on 1st day (P = .004), 4th day (P = .004) and 6th day (P = .02) postoperatively.

Based on earlier clinical studies that postoperative pain can be reduced by combining long-acting anesthetics with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory agents, (46) it can be concluded that further clinical trials are needed to compare the effect of steroids, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and long-acting local anesthetics in reducing postoperative sequelae. Additional studies are also necessary to further define the benefits of preoperative intraregional administration of dexamethasone. Finally, more sensitive measuring techniques to quantify the decrease of post-surgical swelling need to be developed. The literature contains studies that have used methylprednisolone, betamethasone, and dexamethasone at various dosages and routes of administration.

The risk factors of edema, pain and swelling after surgery have been reported by many investigators and included age, gender, smoking, oral hygiene, duration and difficulty of the operation, and surgical experience. (4751)

The findings of this study may have a significant clinical impact as submucosal dexamethasone injection is an effective therapeutic strategy for improving the quality of life of the patient Overall, the present study have shown the advantage of submucosal dexamethasone as an effective alternative to systemically applied dexamethasone. The technique is quite simple, less invasive, painless (given in an anesthetized region), and convenient for the surgeon and patient and offers a low-cost solution for the typical patient discomfort associated with the surgical endodontic procedures. Injection after surgery offers the advantage of concentrating the drug near the surgical area with less systemic absorption.

Table 1.

Postoperative pain in the patients of group A & B

Postoperative pain Groups
Level of pain Patients with Preoperative Dexamethasone Patients without Preoperative Dexamethasone P-value

Day 1 No pain 0 0 .004

Mild pain 5 2

Moderate pain 24 17

Severe pain 1 11

Day 2 No pain 0 0 .064

Mild pain 14 11

Moderate pain 16 14

Severe pain 0 5

Day 3 No pain 2 0 .11

Mild pain 22 18

Moderate pain 6 12

Severe pain 0 0

Day 4 No pain 15 4 .004

Mild pain 14 26

Moderate pain 1 0

Severe pain 0 0

Day 5 No pain 25 19 .14

Mild pain 5 11

Moderate pain 0 0

Severe pain 0 0

Day 6 No pain 30 24 .02

Mild pain 0 6

Moderate pain 0 0

Severe pain 0 0
*

Mild pain:

**

Moderate Pain:

***

Severe Pain:

Acknowledgement

We would like to thank all the dental and Para medical staff of Punjab Dental Hospital, Lahore for their help and support in data collection procedure.

References

  • 1.Lin S, Levin L, Emodi O, El-Naaj IA, Peled M. Etodolac versus dexamethasone effect in reduction of postoperative symptoms following surgical endodontic treatment: a double-blind study. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2006;101:814–7. doi: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2005.08.039. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Guyton A. Textbook of medical physiology. 10th ed. Philadelphia: WB Saunders Co; 2000. pp. 552–5. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Iqbal MK, Kratchman SI, Guess GM, Karabucak B, Kim S. Microscopic periradicular surgery: perioperative predictors for postoperative clinical outcomes and quality of life assessment. J Endod. 2007;33:239–44. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2006.11.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Chong BS, Pitt Ford TR. Postoperative pain after root-end resection and filling. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2005;100:762–6. doi: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2005.01.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Tsesis I, et al. Comparison of quality of life after surgical endodontic treatment using two techniques: a prospective study. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2005;99:367–71. doi: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2004.06.082. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Penarrocha M, Garcia B, Marti E, Balaguer J. Pain and inflammation after periapical surgery in 60 patients. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2006;64:429–33. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2005.11.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Tsesis I, Fuss Z, Lin S, Tilinger G, Peled M. Analysis of postoperative symptoms following surgical endodontic treatment. Quintessence Int. 2003;34:756–60. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Alexander R, Throndson R. A review of perioperative corticosteroid use in dentoalveolar surgery. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2000;90:406–15. doi: 10.1067/moe.2000.109778. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Kim K, et al. The use of corticosteroids and nonsteroidal anti inflammatory medication for the management of pain and inflammation after third molar surgery: A review of the literature. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2009;107:630. doi: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2008.11.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Esen E, Tasar F, Akhan O. Determination of the anti-inflammatory effects of methylprednisolone on the sequelae of third molar surgery. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1999;57:1201. doi: 10.1016/s0278-2391(99)90486-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Ustün Y, et al. Comparison of the effects of two doses of methylprednisolone on pain, swelling, and trismus after third molar surgery. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2003;96:535. doi: 10.1016/S1079210403004645. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Tiwana PS, et al. The impact of intravenous corticosteroids with third molar surgery in patients at high risk for delayed health-related quality of life and clinical recovery. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2005;63:55. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2004.01.029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Skjelbred P, Lokken P. Post-operative pain and inflammatory reaction reduced by injection of a corticosteroid: A controlled trial in bilateral oral surgery. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 1982;21:391. doi: 10.1007/BF00542325. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Pedersen A. Decadron phosphate in the relief of complaints after third molar surgery: A double-blind, controlled trial with bilateral oral surgery. Int J Oral Surg. 1985;14:235. doi: 10.1016/s0300-9785(85)80034-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Montgomery MT, et al. The use of glucocorticosteroids to lessen the inflammatory sequelae following third molar surgery. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1990;48:179. doi: 10.1016/s0278-2391(10)80207-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Neupert EA, et al. Evaluation of dexamethasone for reduction of postsurgical sequelae of third molar removal. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1992;50:1177. doi: 10.1016/0278-2391(92)90149-t. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Markiewicz MR, et al. Corticosteroids reduce postoperative morbidity after third molar surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2008;66:1881. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2008.04.022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Dan AEB, Thygesen TH, Pinholt EM. Corticosteroid administration in oral and orthognathic surgery: A systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2010;68:2207. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2010.04.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Carriches LC, González JM, Rodríguez DM. Analgesic efficacy of diclofenac versus methylprednisolone in the control of postoperative pain after surgical removal of lower third molars. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2005;10:432–9. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Carriches LC, González JM, Rodríguez DM. The use of methylprednisolone versus diclofenac in the treatment of inflammation and trismus after surgical removal of lower third molars. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2006;11:440–5. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Dionne RA, Gordon SM, Rowan J, Kent A, Brahim JS. Dexamethasone suppresses peripheral prostanoid levels without analgesia in a clinical model of acute inflammation. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2003;61:997–1003. doi: 10.1016/s0278-2391(03)00310-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Filho JRL, Maurette PE, Allais M, Cotinho M, Fernandes C. Clinical comparative study of the effectiveness of two dosages of Dexamethasone to control postoperative swelling, trismus and pain after the surgical extraction of mandibular impacted third molars. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2008;13:129–32. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Schmelzeisen R, Frolich JC. Prevention of postoperative swelling and pain by dexamethasone after operative removal of impacted third molar teeth. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 1993;44:275–7. doi: 10.1007/BF00271371. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Baxendale BR, Vater M, Lavery KM. Dexamethasone reduces pain and swelling following extraction of third molar teeth. Anaesthesia. 1993;48:961–4. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.1993.tb07474.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Berge TI, Boe OE. Predictor of postoperative morbidity after surgical removal of mandibular third molars. Acta Odontol Scan. 1994;52:162. doi: 10.3109/00016359409027591. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Capuzzi P, Montebugnoli L, Vaccaro MA. Extraction of impacted thirds molars. A longitudinal prospective study on factors that affect postoperative recovery. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1994;77:341. doi: 10.1016/0030-4220(94)90194-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Guarinos J, et al. Estudio del dolor y la inflamación en 70 pacientes tras la colocación de 163 implantes dentales. RCOE. 1998;3:229. [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Esen E, Tasar F, Akhan O. Determination of the anti-inflammatory effects of methylprednisolone on the sequelae of third molar surgery. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1999;57:1201–6. doi: 10.1016/s0278-2391(99)90486-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Ustun Y, Erdogan O, Esen E, Karsli ED. Comparison of the effects of 2 doses of methylprednisolone on pain, swelling, and trismus after third molar surgery. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2003;96:535–9. doi: 10.1016/S1079210403004645. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Kvist T, Reit C. Postoperative discomfort associated with surgical and nonsurgical endodontic retreatment. Endod Dent Traumatol. 2000;16:71–4. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-9657.2000.016002071.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Gersema L, Baker K. Use of corticosteroids in oral surgery. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1992;50:270–7. doi: 10.1016/0278-2391(92)90325-t. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Montgomery MT, Hogg JP, Roberts DL, Redding SW. The use of glucocorticosteroids to lessen the inflammatory sequelae following third molar surgery. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1990;48:179–87. doi: 10.1016/s0278-2391(10)80207-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Ustun Y, Erdogan O, Esen E, Karsli ED. Comparison of the effects of 2 doses of methylprednisolone on pain, swelling, and trismus after third molar surgery. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2003;96:535–539. doi: 10.1016/S1079210403004645. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Kawamura M, et al. Are the anti-inflammatory effects of dexamethasone responsible for inhibition of the induction of enzymes involved in prostanoid formation in rat carrageenin-induced pleurisy? Eur J Pharmacol. 2000;400:127–35. doi: 10.1016/s0014-2999(00)00377-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Esen E, Tasar F, Akhan O. Determination of the anti-inflammatory effects of methylprednisolone on the sequelae of third molar surgery. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1999;57:1201–6. doi: 10.1016/s0278-2391(99)90486-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Barron RP, et al. Effect of dexamethasone and dipyrone on lingual and inferior alveolar nerve hypersensitivity following third molar extractions: preliminary report. J Orofac Pain. 2004;18:62–8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Dionne RA, Gordon SM, Rowan J, Kent A, Brahim JS. Dexamethasone suppresses peripheral prostanoid levels without analgesia in a clinical model of acute inflammation. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2003;61:997–1003. doi: 10.1016/s0278-2391(03)00310-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Munro IR, Boyd JB, Wainwright DJ. Effect of steroids in maxillofacial surgery. Ann Plast Surg. 1986;17:440–4. doi: 10.1097/00000637-198611000-00011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Neupert EA, Lee JW, Philput CB, Gordon JR. Evaluation of dexamethasone for reduction of postsurgical sequelae of third molar removal. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1992;50:1177–82. doi: 10.1016/0278-2391(92)90149-t. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Von Arx DP, Simpson MT. The effect of dexamethasone on neuroprexia following third molar surgery. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1989;27:477–80. doi: 10.1016/s0266-4356(89)80005-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Christiansen R, Kirkevang LL, Bindslev PH, Wenzel A. Patient discomfort following periapical surgery. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2008;105:245–50. doi: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2007.08.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Ong KS, Seymour RA. Pain measurement in humans. Surgeon. 2004;2:15–27. doi: 10.1016/s1479-666x(04)80133-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.García B, Larrazabal C, Peñarrocha M. Pain and swelling in periapical surgery. A literature update. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2008;13:726–9. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Collins SL, Moore RA, McQuay HJ. The visual analogue pain intensity scale: what is moderate pain in millimetres? Pain. 1997;72:95–7. doi: 10.1016/s0304-3959(97)00005-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.AL khateeb TA, Marouf HA, Mahmoud MA. Clinical evaluation of dexamethasone Vs Metyhyleprednesalone for reducing postoperative inflammatory sequelae following third molar surgery. Saudi Dent J. 1996;8:131–5. [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Averbuch M, Katzper M. Assessment of visual analog versus categorical scale for measurement of osteoarthritis pain. J Clin Pharmacol. 2004;44:368–72. doi: 10.1177/0091270004263995. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Osborn TP, Frederickson G, Jr, Small IA. A prospective study of complications related to mandibular third molar surgery. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1985;43:767. doi: 10.1016/0278-2391(85)90331-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Sisk AL, Hammer WB, Shelton DW. Complications following removal of impacted third molars: The role of the experience of the surgeon. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1986;44:855. doi: 10.1016/0278-2391(86)90221-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Capuzzi P, Montebugnoli L, Vaccaro MA. Extraction of impacted third molars: A longitudinal prospective study on factors that affect postoperative recovery. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1994;77:341. doi: 10.1016/0030-4220(94)90194-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Bui CH, Seldin EB, Dodson TB. Types, frequencies, and risk factors for complications after third molar extraction. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2003;61:1379. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2003.04.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Larrazábal C, García B, Peñarrocha M. Influence of oral hygiene and smoking on pain and swelling after surgical extraction of impacted mandibular third molars. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2010;68:43. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2009.07.061. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from International Journal of Health Sciences are provided here courtesy of Qassim University

RESOURCES