Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Nov 7.
Published in final edited form as: Analyst. 2012 Sep 10;137(21):4910–4912. doi: 10.1039/c2an35870k

A new, highly water-soluble, fluorescent turn-on chemodosimeter for direct measurement of hydrogen sulfide in biological fluids

Matthew C T Hartman a,b,, M Michael Dcona a,b
PMCID: PMC3522176  NIHMSID: NIHMS408676  PMID: 22962656

Abstract

A new reaction-based fluorescent reporter for H2S has been developed based on 8-aminopyrene-1,3,6-trisulfonate. This reporter shows high selectivity for H2S over other ions and thiols, and can detect H2S directly in serum without additives.


Although previously considered as a toxic gas, hydrogen sulfide has recently been discovered to be an important gaseous signaling compound. H2S has been shown to be involved in a diverse and ever expanding array of biochemical processes such as inflammation, control of blood pressure, neurotransmission, and ischemia reperfusion.19 Several methods to determine the H2S concentration in biological samples have been developed including those based on colorimetric10, 11, electrochemical12, 13, and other approaches14, 15. However these methods often require extensive sample processing before measurement, complicating their use.

Because of the potential ability to monitor H2S in situ, we and other groups have very recently become interested in investigating the use of fluorescence-turn-on reporters for H2S 1629. One successful strategy pioneered by the Chang group19 has been to use the ability of H2S to rapidly and selectively reduce azides to amines as a means to turn on fluorescence22, 23, 26, 29. Conveniently, many fluorescent molecules are quenched when their aryl amino groups are converted to the corresponding azides2931. In this paper our effort has focused on an azido analog of 8-aminopyrene-1,3,6-trisulfonic acid (APTS) and its use as an H2S chemodosimeter. As compared to other profluorescent molecules used for H2S sensing, 8-azidopyrene-1,3,6-trisulfonic acid (N3-PTS) has the advantages of high selectivity vs. other ions and thiols, and extremely high water solubility. These features enable analysis of H2S concentrations in biological samples without prior sample processing.

N3-PTS was prepared in a single step from known fluorescent dye APTS using Sandmeyer conditions (Scheme 1). The resulting product could be readily purified using size exclusion chromatography with Bio-Gel P-2. The ammonium salt of N3-PTS is highly soluble in water at concentrations >100 mM.

Scheme 1.

Scheme 1

Synthesis of 8-azidopyrene-1,3,6-trisulfonic acid

The absorption spectrum of N3-PTS shows a blue-shift relative to APTS (Fig. 1a) with peaks at 382 and 403 nm, vs. 427 nm for APTS (for further spectral parameters, See ESI Fig. S1 and Table S1). As seen with other fluorophores 19, 22, 30, 31, the presence of the electron-rich azide dramatically quenches the fluorescence (Fig. 1b) of N3-PTS. At 425 nm excitation, the quantum yield of N3-PTS is 25-fold lower than APTS (See ESI Fig. S2 and Table S2). By mixing N3-PTS and APTS in known ratios, we determined that the excitation wavelength to maximize fluorescence enhancement was 435 nm (See ESI Table S1).

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Spectral parameters of APTS and N3-PTS. (A) The absorbance spectral scans of N3-PTS (red) and APTS (blue), both at 50 μM, are shown. (B) The fluorescence spectral emission scans (λex = 435 nm) of N3-PTS (red) and APTS (blue), both at 5 μM, are shown.

We expected that H2S-mediated azide reduction would convert N3-PTS to APTS, with a corresponding enhancement in fluorescence. A solution of 50 μM NaHS was prepared and added to 100 μM N3-PTS in phosphate buffer. The reaction was monitored by fluorescence (Fig. 2) and was compared with the same reaction lacking NaHS. A time-dependent large increase in fluroescence was observed in the solution containing NaHS. After 90 minutes a 7-fold fluorescence enhancement was observed. For a time course of H2S reactions at different cocentrations see ESI Figure S3.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Enhancement in fluorescence of N3-PTS solutions in the presence of H2S. A solution of 100 μM N3-PTS and either 50 μM NaHS or water were incubated in phosphate buffer (pH 7.8) at room temperature for various times. Fluorescence emission scans (λex = 435 nm) were taken every 5 minutes.

We then proceeded to test the selectivity of our potential H2S chemodosimeter versus a collection of several common anions, reactive oxygen and nitrogen species, and thiols (Fig. 3). Significant fluorescence enhancement was observed only in the presence of 50 μM HS. The fluorescence signal of other ions (OAc, N3, HCO3, Cl, OH, NO2, SO42−, SO32−, S2O32−), thiols (glutathione and cysteine), or reactive oxygen and nitrogen species (See ESI, Figure S4) gave little to no fluorescence enhancement when tested at 1 mM, a 20-fold higher concentration. Thus, N3-PTS shows excellent selectivity for aqueous hydrogen sulfide in the presence of other ions and thiols encountered in biological environments.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Comparison of the fluorescence of N3-PTS after incubation in 50 mM phosphate buffer (pH 7.8) along with with NaHS (50 μM) or NaOAc, NaN3, NaHCO3, NaCl, NaOH, NaNO2, Na2SO4, Na2SO3, Na2S2O4, reduced glutathione or L-cysteine hydrochloride (all 1 mM). Fluorescence emission (λex = 435 nm) was measured after 90 min.

In order to use N3-PTS to quantify HS in biological samples it is desirable that the fluorescence be linearly related to the sulfide concentration. Indeed, treatment of N3-PTS (100 μM) with several different concentrations of HS led to the expected linear relationship (Fig. 4). HS was easily quantifiable by fluorescence when its concentration was between 2–100 μM.

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

Plot of H2S concentration vs. N3-PTS fluorescence. N3-PTS (100 μM) and H2S (0–100 μM) were incubated in 50 mM phosphate buffer pH 7.8 at room temperature for 90 minutes. Error bars denote one standard deviation from the mean of three experiments.

With the linearity and selectivity studies completed, we turned our attention H2S detection in biological milieu. First, we investigated the extent to which APTS fluorescence was quenched in fetal bovine serum (FBS) vs. standard phosphate buffer. FBS showed little, if any, quenching (See ESI, Figure S5), suggesting that the measurement of H2S could be accomplished directly in the media without prior removal of proteins. Moreover, the high water solubility of N3-PTS could in principle allow measurement of fluorescence without addition of any organic co-solvents or detergents. We then titrated NaHS into FBS containing N3-PTS. After 90 minutes, the fluorescence was measured showing good linear dependence (Fig. 5). The point at which the fluorescence was >2-fold above background was 9 μM.

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5

Linear relationship between H2S concentration and N3-PTS fluorescence in 90% fetal bovine serum (FBS). N3-PTS (100 μM) and H2S (0–100 μM) were incubated in FBS at room temperature for 90 minutes. Error bars denote one standard deviation from the mean of three experiments.

Using N3-PTS, we can measure the H2S concentration in FBS in the range of 10–100 μM. This concentration range corresponds exactly with the range of H2S concentrations found in human blood32. We also observed that the fluorescence enhancement in FBS at the same concentration of NaHS was diminished compared to phosphate buffer. This reduced sensitivity was presumably due to the quenching of the added HS with serum electrophiles33. We surmise, therefore, that derivatizing N3-PTS to maximize its reaction rate with H2S will lead to enhanced sensitivity in serum.

In summary. we have developed a new chemodosimeter for hydrogen sulfide based on H2S coversion of profluorescent N3-PTS to APTS. N3-PTS can be prepared in good yield in a single step from commerically available APTS. N3-PTS shows very high selectivity for H2S and is extremely water soluble. These two properties have allowed us to measure H2S levels in serum directly without any processing of the sample or addition of detergents or cosolvents. The compatibility of N3-PTS with aqueous solutions distinguishes it from other fluorescent methods for H2S detection and makes it well suited for in situ analysis of H2S levels in a variety of biological fluids.

Supplementary Material

ESI

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge financial support from the NIH (R15CA167582). We thank J. Turner, D. Selaya and R. White (VCU) for helpful experimental suggestions.

Footnotes

Electronic Supplementary Information (ESI) available: compound characterization by NMR, fluorescence and absorbance spectra. See DOI: 10.1039/b000000x/

References

  • 1.Abe K, Kimura H. J Neurosci. 1996;16:1066–71. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.16-03-01066.1996. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Eto K, Asada T, Arima K, Makifuchi T, Kimura H. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2002;293:1485–1488. doi: 10.1016/S0006-291X(02)00422-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Fiorucci S, Antonelli E, Mencarelli A, Orlandi S, Renga B, Rizzo G, Distrutti E, Shah V, Morelli A. Hepatology. 2005;42:539–548. doi: 10.1002/hep.20817. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Kabil O, Banerjee R. J Biol Chem. 2010;285:21903–21907. doi: 10.1074/jbc.R110.128363. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Li L, Bhatia M, Zhu YZ, Zhu YC, Raninath RD, Wang ZJ, Anuar Binte Mohammed F, Whiteman M, Salto-Tellez M, Moore PK. FASEB J. 2005;19:1196–1198. doi: 10.1096/fj.04-3583fje. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Li L, Rose P, Moore PK. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol. 2011;51:169–187. doi: 10.1146/annurev-pharmtox-010510-100505. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Nicholson CK, Calvert JW. Pharmacol Res. 2010;62:289–297. doi: 10.1016/j.phrs.2010.06.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Papapetropoulos A, Pyriochou A, Altaany Z, Yang G, Marazioti A, Zhou Z, Jeschke MG, Branski LK, Herndon DN, Wang R, Szabo C. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009;106:21972–21977. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0908047106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Yang G, Wu L, Jiang B, Yang W, Qi J, Cao K, Meng Q, Mustafa AK, Mu W, Zhang S, Snyder SH, Wang R. Science. 2008;322:587–590. doi: 10.1126/science.1162667. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Choi MMF. Analyst. 1998;123:1631–1634. [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Siegel LM. Anal Biochem. 1965;11:126–132. doi: 10.1016/0003-2697(65)90051-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Lawrence NS, Davis J, Marken F, Jiang L, Jones TGJ, Davies SN, Compton RG. Sens Actuators, B. 2000;69:189–192. [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Jeroschewski P, Haase K, Trommer A, Grundler P. Fresenius J Anal Chem. 1993;346:930–933. [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Furne J, Saeed A, Levitt MD. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2008;295:R1479–R1485. doi: 10.1152/ajpregu.90566.2008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Ishigami M, Hiraki K, Umemura K, Ogasawara Y, Ishii K, Kimura H. Antioxid Redox Signaling. 2009;11:205–214. doi: 10.1089/ars.2008.2132. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Cao X, Lin W, He L. Org Lett. 2011;13:4716–4719. doi: 10.1021/ol201932c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Hou F, Cheng J, Xi P, Chen F, Huang L, Xie G, Shi Y, Liu H, Bai D, Zeng Z. Dalton Trans. 2012;41:5799–5804. doi: 10.1039/c2dt12462a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Hou F, Huang L, Xi P, Cheng J, Zhao X, Xie G, Shi Y, Cheng F, Yao X, Bai D, Zeng Z. Inorg Chem. 2012;51:2454–2460. doi: 10.1021/ic2024082. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Lippert AR, New EJ, Chang CJ. J Am Chem Soc. 2011;133:10078–10080. doi: 10.1021/ja203661j. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Liu C, Peng B, Li S, Park CM, Whorton AR, Xian M. Org Lett. 2012;14:2184–2187. doi: 10.1021/ol3008183. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Liu C, Pan J, Li S, Zhao Y, Wu LY, Berkman CE, Whorton AR, Xian M. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2011;50:10327–10329. doi: 10.1002/anie.201104305. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Montoya LA, Pluth MD. Chem Commun. 2012;48:4767–4769. doi: 10.1039/c2cc30730h. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Peng H, Cheng Y, Dai C, King AL, Predmore BL, Lefer DJ, Wang B. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2011;50:9672–9675. doi: 10.1002/anie.201104236. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Qian Y, Karpus J, Kabil O, Zhang S, Zhu H, Banerjee R, Zhao J, He C. Nat Commun. 2011;2:495. doi: 10.1038/ncomms1506. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Sasakura K, Hanaoka K, Shibuya N, Mikami Y, Kimura Y, Komatsu T, Ueno T, Terai T, Kimura H, Nagano T. J Am Chem Soc. 2011;133:18003–18005. doi: 10.1021/ja207851s. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Yu F, Li P, Song P, Wang B, Zhao J, Han K. Chem Commun. 2012;48:2852–2854. doi: 10.1039/c2cc17658k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Yang XF, Wang L, Xu H, Zhao M. Anal Chim Acta. 2009;631:91–95. doi: 10.1016/j.aca.2008.10.037. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Choi MG, Cha S, Lee H, Jeon HL, Chang S. Chem Commun. 2009:7390–7392. doi: 10.1039/b916476f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Chen S, Chen ZJ, Ren W, Ai HW. J Am Chem Soc. 2012;134:9589–9592. doi: 10.1021/ja303261d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Sivakumar K, Xie F, Cash BM, Long S, Barnhill HN, Wang Q. Org Lett. 2004;6:4603–4606. doi: 10.1021/ol047955x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Sawa M, Hsu TL, Itoh T, Sugiyama M, Hanson SR, Vogt PK, Wong CH. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006;103:12371–12376. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0605418103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Richardson CJ, Magee EA, Cummings JH. Clin Chim Acta. 2000;293:115–125. doi: 10.1016/s0009-8981(99)00245-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Nishida M, Sawa T, Kitajima N, Ono K, Inoue H, Ihara H, Motohashi H, Yamamoto M, Suematsu M, Kurose H, van der Vliet A, Freeman BA, Shibata T, Uchida K, Kumagai Y, Akaike T. Nat Chem Biol. 2012;8:714–724. doi: 10.1038/nchembio.1018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

ESI

RESOURCES