Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Dec 17.
Published in final edited form as: Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 2009;48(46):8766–8769. doi: 10.1002/anie.200904607

Total Synthesis of Auripyrone A Using a Tandem Non-Aldol Aldol-Paterson Aldol Process as a Key Step**

Michael E Jung 1,, Ramin Salehi-Rad 1
PMCID: PMC3523744  NIHMSID: NIHMS415535  PMID: 19824033

Abstract

A tandem non-aldol aldol-Paterson aldol generates the polypropionate 12 from the epoxy alcohol 8 and the ketone 9 in only two steps and 74% overall yield as a single diastereomer, due to double stereodifferentiation, where the stereoinduction from the enolate and the α-methyl substituent of the aldehyde are reinforcing. This compound was used for an efficient synthesis of the natural product auripyrone A, 1, in only 18 steps and 17% overall yield, using a highly regioselective hemiketalization of a keto diol and a late stage spiroketalization onto a stable hemiketal as the final key steps.

Keywords: Aldol react, Synthesis (org.), Epoxides, Rearrangements, Natural prod


In 1996, Yamada, et al., reported the isolation of auripyrones A 1 and B 2 from the methanol extracts of the sea hare Dolabella auricularia (Aplysiidae) (Figure 1).[1] Extensive NMR investigation of the compounds revealed a complex spiroketal core, capped at one end by a tetrasubstituted γ-pyrone, residing in an anomerically favored configuration where all the substituents are positioned equatorially except the C10 methyl and the C11 acyloxy groups. Auripyrones A 1 and B 2 showed cytotoxicity against HeLa S3 cells with IC50 values of 260 and 480 ng/mL, respectively. To date one total synthesis[2] of auripyrone A 1 has been reported by Perkins and coworkers, utilizing an elegant biomimetic cyclization of an acyclic triketone intermediate to generate the spiroketal moiety.[3] The major drawback of this approach, however, is the late stage formation of the γ-pyrone in the presence of the sensitive spiroketal moiety which proceeded with poor yield (39% BRSM). Nonetheless, Perkins’ convergent total synthesis of auripyrone A 1 constitutes the only established synthetic route, and led to the determination of the absolute stereochemistry of the natural product. Herein, we report our convergent approach for the total synthesis of auripyrone A 1 as a single diastereomer in high chemical yield.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

In our retrosynthetic analysis (Scheme 1), the sensitive spiroketal moiety of auripyrone A 1 could be derived from a late stage cyclization of the C-17 ketone onto the hemiketal 3, which should be available from the aldolate 4. The key intermediate 4 could be obtained from a fully matched[4] double stereodifferentiating[5] anti aldol reaction of the boron enolate of the ketone 6 and the aldehyde 5. The γ-pyrone moiety of 5 would result from the aldehyde 7 following the protocol of Hoveyda and coworkers.[6] Finally, the stereopentad 7 was envisioned to arise from the known epoxide 8[7] by a novel tandem non-aldol aldol[8]/Paterson lactate-derived aldol[9] reaction with the ketone 9.

Scheme 1.

Scheme 1

The synthesis commenced with the assembly of 7, using a highly convergent tandem non-aldol aldol/Paterson lactate-derived aldol reaction (Scheme 2). Epoxidation of the allylic alcohol 10 (synthesized in 5 steps from (S)-Roche ester)[10] under reagent-controlled Sharpless conditions,[11] or substrate controlled conditions with mCPBA,[12] furnished the epoxide 8 in 85% yield and 20:1 diastereomeric ratio (dr), or 90% yield and 16:1 dr, respectively. Protection of 8 with TESCl provided the corresponding silyl ether which was treated with TESOTf at −45 °C to give, via the non-aldol aldol rearrangement, the syn-aldol adduct 11 in 86% yield and 20:1 dr. Unlike conventional auxiliary based aldol methods which require a protection step followed by removal of the chiral auxiliary to generate the protected aldehyde, the non-aldol aldol reaction provides direct access to pure silyl protected aldehydes without flash column purification[13] for an iterative aldol process. To that end, the subsequent anti aldol reaction of the aldehyde 11 with the E-boron enolate of Paterson’s lactate-derived ketone 9[9c] furnished the desired anti-aldolate 12 in 86% yield as a single diastereomer. The remarkable stereoselectivity of this reaction is due to double stereodifferentiation,[5] where the stereoinduction from the enolate[9c] and the α-methyl substituent of the aldehyde[14] are reinforcing. Mild Lewis acid catalyzed[15] protection of the alcohol 12 as the PMB ether proceeded smoothly without deprotection of the acid sensitive TES group to afford the ketone 13 in 93% yield. Reduction of 13 and concomitant removal of the α′-benzoate with LiBH4 followed by periodate cleavage of the resulting diol[16] afforded the desired aldehyde 7 in 83% yield over 2 steps. This novel tandem non-aldol aldol/Paterson lactate-derived aldol protocol constitutes a highly efficient, convergent approach for the synthesis of the desired stereopentad 7, generating four aldol stereocenters in two steps. Conversion of the aldehyde 7 in three steps to the meso-polypropionate 14, which possessed no optical rotation and displayed only twelve 13C NMR resonances indicating a symmetrical structure, confirmed the assigned stereochemistry of 7.

Scheme 2.

Scheme 2

Reagents and conditions: a) Ti(OiPr)4, tBuOOH, (+)-DIPT, DCM, −10 °C, 85%, 20:1 dr or mCPBA, K2HPO4, DCM, −10 °C, 90%, 16:1 dr; b) TESCl, Imidazole, DCM, 98%; c) TESOTf, DIPEA, DCM, −45 °C, 86%, 20:1 dr; d) 9, cHex2BCl, Me2NEt, Et2O, −78 °C → 0 °C, 2 h; 0 °C → −78 °C; 11, −78 °C → −25 °C, 15 h; H2O2, MeOH, pH 7 buffer, 0 °C, 1 h, 86%, one isomer; e) PMBOC(=NH)CCl3, Sc(OTf)3, toluene 93%; f) LiBH4, THF, 97%, 8:1 dr; g) NaIO4, MeOH:pH 7 buffer (2:1), 86%. h) NaBH4, EtOH, 0 °C, 81%; i) TBDPSCl, Imidazole, DCM; j) CAN, CH3CN:H2O (9:1), 78% two steps.

Next, we turned to the synthesis of the γ-pyrone moiety[17] (Scheme 3). Following the protocol of Hoveyda,[6] we obtained, via the aldol reaction of the lithium enolate of the silyloxy enone 15[6] with the aldehyde 7, the aldolate 16 in 94% yield as a mixture of isomers.[18] Oxidation of the isomeric mixture of 16 with Dess-Martin periodinane (DMP)[19] and subsequent heating of the resulting diketone in DMF[20] provided the desired γ-pyrone 17 in 68% yield over two steps. Acid promoted deprotection of the TES ether furnished the alcohol 18 which was subjected to Yamaguchi esterification[21] with isovaleric acid to give the ester 19 in 98% yield. Treatment of the silyl ether 19 with HF·pyridine provided the primary alcohol 20[22] which was oxidized with DMP to afford the aldol precursor, the aldehyde 5. The other component of the aldol reaction, the α-methyl-β-hydroxy ketone 6, was also readily available from TES protection of the known ketone 21[2a] in 96% yield. The E-boron enolate of the ketone 6 underwent a highly diastereoselective anti aldol reaction with 5 to provide the Felkin product 4 in 94% yield and 21:1 diastereomeric ratio. The excellent diastereoselectivity of this double stereodifferentiating[5] aldol reaction could be attributed to a fully matched[4] reactant pair, where the stereoinduction from the β- hydroxy[23] and the α-methyl[14] substituent of the aldehyde and the α-methyl stereocenter of the ketone[24] are reinforcing.

Scheme 3.

Scheme 3

Reagents and conditions: a) 15, LDA, −78 °C, 7, 94%; b) DMP, DCM, NaHCO3; c) DMF, 55 °C μw, 6 h, 68% two steps; d) PPTS, DCM:MeOH (3:1), 96%; e) 2,4,6-trichlorobenzoyl chloride, DMAP, Et3N, isovaleric acid, 98%; f) HF·pyr, CH3CN/pyr, 94%; g) DMP, DCM, NaHCO3, 98%; h) TESCl, imidazole, DCM, 96%; i) 6, cHex2BCl, Me2NEt, Et2O, −78 °C → 0 °C, 2 h, 0 °C → −78 °C, 5, −78 °C → −25 °C, 15 h, H2O2, MeOH, pH 7 buffer, 0 °C, 1 h, 94%, 21:1 dr.

With the key intermediate 4 in hand, we set out to investigate the formation of the spiroketal moiety of auripyrone A 1 (Scheme 4). Our initial attempts at generating the desired spiroketal by acid-catalyzed cyclization of the C-9 hydroxyl group onto either a γ-pyrone[25] or an acyclic triketone[2a] failed and led to rapid 1,5-acyl migration. The high propensity of our system for acyl migration presumably arises from the inherent preference of the acyclic polyketide[26] to populate the local conformation I where the C-9 and C-11 oxygen moieties are in close spatial proximity. To circumvent this problem, we decided to mask the C-9 hydroxy substituent and attempt spiroketalization from a hemiketal platform.[27] Oxidation of the alcohol 4 afforded the corresponding diketone as a single isomer[28] which was deprotected with DDQ to furnish the hemiketal 23 as the major product by crude 1H and 13C NMR. However, purification on silica gel gave the desired cyclic isomer 23 only in 66% yield as a single isomer, along with the open chain isomer 22 in 21% yield as a mixture of two C-14 methyl epimers.[29] Deprotection of the TES ether of the hemiketal 23 with HF·pyridine provided the hemiketal 24 in 86% yield as a single isomer[30] which was stable to column chromatography. Interestingly, the TES deprotection of the acyclic diketone 22 also afforded the hemiketal 24 exclusively, as a mixture of C-14 epimers, in 78% yield. The mixed configuration of the C-14 stereocenter in the hemiketal 24 is not critical since both diastereomers could equilibrate under thermodynamic cyclization conditions to the natural product. Nonetheless, to circumvent having to purify the unstable hemiketal 23 and recycle the acyclic diketone 22, a variety of conditions were screened for the deprotection of the ethers. We were gratified to find that oxidation of the aldolate 4 followed by treatment with CAN in acetonitrile and water (9:1) for 15 minutes led to concurrent removal of the PMB and TES ethers, providing exclusively the stable hemiketal 24 as a single diastereomer in 74% yield over two steps.[31] The selectivity of this reaction is remarkable and yet difficult to explain since the deprotection of the PMB and TES ethers unveils two alcohols which could potentially cyclize on the C-13 ketone to form a hemiketal. Simple thermodynamic MM2 calculations proved ineffective and higher level calculations will be necessary to elucidate the remarkable selectivity of this reaction for exclusive formation of the hemiketal 24.

Scheme 4.

Scheme 4

Reagents and conditions: a) DMP, DCM, NaHCO3, 94%; b) DDQ, DCM:pH 7 buffer (9:1), 66% 23, 21% 22; c) HF·pyr, CH3CN/pyr, 86%; d) HF·pyr, CH3CN/pyr, 78%; e) DMP, DCM, NaHCO3; f) CAN, CH3CN:H2O (9:1), 74% two steps; g) DMP, DCM, NaHCO3; h) Amberlyst-15, DCM, 0 °C → 25 °C, 80% two steps.

Having successfully prepared the hemiketal 24 as a single diastereomer from the aldolate 4 in 2 steps in excellent yield, we next oxidized the alcohol of 24, and the resulting diketone[32] was treated with Amberlyst-15 to afford the natural product auripyrone A 1 as a single diastereomer in 80% yield over two steps. The remarkably high chemical yield of this spiroketalization could presumably be attributed to the lower entropic cost of cyclization onto a conformationally limited hemiketal platform, or the increase in the rate of the acid-catalyzed cyclization, since the configuration of the C-14 stereocenter of the isomerically pure starting material 24 matches the desired configuration in the natural product.

The chemistry described here constitutes a highly convergent approach for the synthesis of auripyrone A 1 from the known epoxide 8 in 18 steps and 17% overall yield. Our strategy employs a novel tandem non-aldol aldol/Paterson lactate-derived aldol to generate the stereopentad backbone, a highly regioselective hemiketalization of a keto diol, and a late stage spiroketalization onto the stable hemiketal.

Footnotes

**

This work was supported by the National Science Foundation (CHE 0614591). R. S.-R. was an NIH Chemistry-Biology Interface trainee, 2005-8, and thanks the NIH Medical Scientist Training Program (MSTP) at UCLA for generous financial support.

References

  • 1.Suenaga K, Kigoshi H, Yamada K. Tetrahedron Lett. 1996;37:5151–5154. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Lister T, Perkins MV. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2006;45:2560–2564. doi: 10.1002/anie.200504573.For synthetic efforts towards auripyrone A 1 see: Perkins MV, Jahangiri S, Taylor MR. Tetrahedron Lett. 2006;47:2025–2028.Perkins MV, Sampson RA, Joannou J, Taylor MR. Tetrahedron Lett. 2006;47:3791–3795.
  • 3.The minor (6%) isomer in this reaction was inseparable during the remainder of the synthesis and was observed as a minor impurity in the spectra of the final synthetic auripyrone A 1.
  • 4.Evans DA, Dart MJ, Duffy JL, Rieger DL. J Am Chem Soc. 1995;117:9073–9074. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Masamune S, Choy W, Petersen JS, Sita LR. Angew Chem Int Ed. 1985;24:1–30. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Gillingham DG, Hoveyda AH. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2007;46:3860–3864. doi: 10.1002/anie.200700501. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Kang SH, Jun HS. Chemical Commun. 1998:1929–1930. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.a) Jung ME, D’Amico DC. J Am Chem Soc. 1993;115:12208–12209. [Google Scholar]; b) Jung ME, Hoffmann B, Rausch B, Contreras JM. Org Lett. 2003;5:3159–3161. doi: 10.1021/ol035295a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.a) Paterson I, Wallace DJ, Velazquez SM. Tetrahedron Lett. 1994;35:9083–9086. [Google Scholar]; b) Paterson I, Wallace DJ. Tetrahedron Lett. 1994;35:9087–9090. [Google Scholar]; c) Paterson I, Wallace DJ, Cowden CJ. Synthesis. 1998:639–652. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Zhou J, Burgess K. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2007;46:1129–1131. doi: 10.1002/anie.200603635. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Katsuki T, Sharpless KB. J Am Chem Soc. 1980;102:5974–5976. [Google Scholar]
  • 12.a) Johnson MR, Kishi Y. Tetrahedron Lett. 1979;20:4347–4350. [Google Scholar]; b) Jung ME, D’Amico DC. J Am Chem Soc. 1997;119:12150–12158. [Google Scholar]
  • 13.No column chromatography is necessary since simple extraction with water and diethyl ether removes the triflate salts and the triethylsilanol can be removed under reduced pressure to provide pure silyl protected aldehyde.
  • 14.Roush WR. J Org Chem. 1991;56:4151–4157. [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Rai AN, Basu A. Tetrahedron Lett. 2003;44:2267–2269. [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Paterson I, Blakey SB, Cowden CJ. Tetrahedron Lett. 2002;43:6005–6008. [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Previously reported methods for the synthesis of the γ-pyrone through triketone cyclization proved inefficient for our system. See: Jeffery DW, Perkins MV, White JM. Org Lett. 2005;7:407–409. doi: 10.1021/ol0478178.Jeffery DW, Perkins MV, White JM. Org Lett. 2005;7:1581–1584. doi: 10.1021/ol050236d.Arimoto H, Nishiyama S, Yamamura S. Tetrahedron Lett. 1990;31:5619–5620.Yamamura S, Nishiyama S. Bull Chem Soc Jpn. 1997;70:2025–2037.
  • 18.Although the major isomer could be separated, the mixture of diastereomers was taken on since they could all lead to the same product.
  • 19.a) Dess DB, Martin JC. J Org Chem. 1983;48:4155–4156. [Google Scholar]; b) Dess DB, Martin JC. J Am Chem Soc. 1991;113:7277–7287. [Google Scholar]
  • 20.The original Hoveyda conditions (THF, DBU, 60 °C) were slightly less efficient for cyclization in our system (53% yield over two steps).
  • 21.Inanaga J, Hirata K, Saeki H, Katsuki T, Yamaguchi M. Bull Chem Soc Jpn. 1979;52:1989–1993. [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Treatment with TBAF led to an acyl migration providing exclusively the undesired primary ester secondary alcohol in 78% yield.
  • 23.a) Evans DA, Dart MJ, Duffy JL, Yang MG, Livingston AB. J Am Chem Soc. 1995;117:6619–6620. [Google Scholar]; b) Evans DA, Dart MJ, Duffy JL, Yang MG. J Am Chem Soc. 1996;118:4322–4343. [Google Scholar]
  • 24.a) Evans DA, Ng HP, Clark JS, Rieger DL. Tetrahedron. 1992;48:2127–2142. [Google Scholar]; b) Paterson I, Perkins MV. J Am Chem Soc. 1993;115:1608–1610. [Google Scholar]; c) Vulpetti A, Bernardi A, Gennari C, Goodman JM, Paterson I. Tetrahedron. 1993;49:685–696. [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Crimmins MT, Omahony R. J Org Chem. 1990;55:5894–5900. [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Hoffmann RW. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2000;39:2054–2070. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.For a similar spiroketalization onto a hemiketal, see: Favre S, Gerber-Lemaire S, Vogel P. Org Lett. 2007;9:5107–5110. doi: 10.1021/ol702326x.
  • 28.Prolonged reaction time or slow chromatography led to the epimerization of the acidic C-14 proton.
  • 29.The rate of the column chromatography changed the ratio of 22/23 from 3:1 to 1:1.
  • 30.The structure of this hemiketal was tentatively assigned since reprotecting the alcohol group of the hemiketal 24 as the TES ether afforded a compound that exhibited identical spectral data with the hemiketal 23.
  • 31.The short reaction time is critical, since prolonged exposure led to the formation of the ketal.
  • 32.This diketone was also stable to column chromatography and existed as a single isomer.

RESOURCES