Skip to main content
Neurology logoLink to Neurology
. 2012 Sep 11;79(11):1130–1135. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e3182698c64

Disease-modifying drugs for multiple sclerosis in pregnancy

A systematic review

Ellen Lu 1, Bing Wei Wang 1, Colleen Guimond 1, Anne Synnes 1, Dessa Sadovnick 1, Helen Tremlett 1,
PMCID: PMC3525300  PMID: 22933738

Abstract

Objective:

To systematically review the literature regarding safety of disease-modifying drug (DMD) use during pregnancy on perinatal and developmental outcomes in offspring of patients with multiple sclerosis (MS).

Methods:

A PubMed and EMBASE search up to February 2012 was conducted with a manual search of references from relevant articles. Selected studies were evaluated using internationally accepted criteria.

Results:

Fifteen studies identified 761 interferon β-, 97 glatiramer acetate-, and 35 natalizumab-exposed pregnancies. Study quality ranged from poor to good; no study was rated excellent. Small sample sizes limited most studies. Compared with data for unexposed pregnancies, fair- to good-quality prospective cohort studies reported that interferon β exposure was associated with lower mean birth weight, shorter mean birth length, and preterm birth (<37 weeks), but not low birth weight (<2,500 g), cesarean delivery, congenital anomaly (including malformation), or spontaneous abortion. Fewer studies of fair quality were available for glatiramer acetate and natalizumab. Glatiramer acetate exposure was not associated with lower mean birth weight, congenital anomaly, preterm birth, or spontaneous abortion. Natalizumab exposure did not appear to be associated with shorter mean birth length, lower mean birth weight, or lower mean gestational age. No studies examined mitoxantrone or fingolimod exposure. One study of paternal DMD use during conception found no effect on gestational age or birth weight. Few studies examined longer-term developmental outcomes.

Conclusion:

Further studies are needed to determine the potential risks associated with preconceptional and in utero DMD exposure in patients with MS. Discontinuation of DMDs before conception is still recommended.


Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic degenerative disease of the brain and spinal cord, typically affecting young adults.1 Several disease-modifying drugs (DMD) including interferon β (IFN-β) 1a and 1b, glatiramer acetate (GA), natalizumab, mitoxantrone, and fingolimod are licensed worldwide to reduce the frequency of clinical attacks with the hope of slowing disability progression.2,3 Women with MS are typically advised to discontinue DMD treatment before conceiving to minimize the risk of fetal harm4; nonetheless, prenatal DMD exposure still occurs, in part because approximately 50% of pregnancies are unplanned.5 To our knowledge, no equivalent guidelines exist for men. Based on animal studies and limited human data (mostly observational postmarketing surveillance studies),6 the US Food and Drug Administration has classified GA7 as pregnancy risk category B (no risk shown in animal studies; no adequate human studies).8 IFN-β,9,10 natalizumab,11 and fingolimod12 as category C (risk shown in animal studies; no adequate human studies),8 and mitoxantrone13 as category D (positive evidence of human fetal risk).8 We systematically reviewed studies investigating the safety of DMD exposure on the immediate perinatal and longer-term developmental outcomes in children of patients with MS.

METHODS

Evidence evaluation template.

The International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation (ILCOR) 2010 Evidence Evaluation Template14 was used. This is a validated tool for assessing systematic reviews endorsed by 11 international bodies on cardiovascular health and meets all criteria from “a measurement tool for the ‘assessment of multiple systematic reviews' (AMSTAR).”15

Research question.

In men or women with MS, does periconceptional or in utero exposure to IFN-β, GA, natalizumab, mitoxantrone, or fingolimod have an effect on perinatal and developmental outcomes in offspring compared with no periconceptional or in utero exposure?

Search strategy.

PubMed (1947–February 2012) and EMBASE (1980–February 2012) were searched using the keywords: MS AND [interferon beta; glatiramer acetate; natalizumab; mitoxantrone; fingolimod] AND [pregnancy; conception; child development; spermatozoa; ovum; reproduction; birth; delivery; fetal; neonatal; obstetric]. Alternative terms identified via either database were also included. Keywords were exploded and selected from MeSH terms for PubMed or advanced keyword searches for EMBASE. References from relevant articles were also searched manually. To avoid overlooking important emerging research, we also searched 2010 and 2011 proceedings from the largest conferences covering MS research (the annual meetings of the American Academy of Neurology and the European and Americas Committees of Treatment and Research in Multiple Sclerosis) as a discussion point only, not in the data analysis.

Inclusion and exclusion criteria.

We included studies with the a priori aim of assessing perinatal or developmental outcomes in offspring of men or women with MS exposed to one of the following DMDs during pregnancy of conception: IFN-β (1a and 1b), GA, natalizumab, mitoxantrone or fingolimod. Congenital anomalies included any structural or functional abnormalities present at birth, resulting from malformation, deformation, disruption, or dysplasia. Only English language, peer-reviewed original manuscripts with human subjects were considered for data analysis. No relevant systematic reviews or meta-analyses were identified.

Data analysis.

The level and quality of evidence were determined by the study design, sample size, potential bias, statistical analysis, use of controls, and data collection strategy14 (tables e-1 and e-2 on the Neurology® Web site at www.neurology.org). Potential conflicts of interest were noted but were not included in the quality assessment. Each DMD was assigned an ILCOR Class of Recommendation regarding its use during pregnancy (table e-3). Articles were independently selected and reviewed by E.L. and B.W.W., and consensus on disagreements was reached between H.T., E.L. and B.W.W.

Standard protocol approvals, registrations, and patient consents.

Published data were used for this systematic review; hence, no ethical approval was sought.

RESULTS

Search results.

PubMed yielded 237 hits and EMBASE 278, with 461 unique citations identified. A total of 15 studies were selected (4 prospective cohort,6,1618 5 retrospective cohort,1923 and 6 case series2429 studies) for a total of 761 IFN-β-, 97 GA-, and 35 natalizumab-exposed pregnancies. Study characteristics are summarized in tables 1 and e-4. From the 15 studies analyzed, there were more negative than positive findings reported, and most studies did not appear to have potential conflicts of interest. However, studies with negative findings appeared more likely to have had industry funding support. Overall, the level of evidence ranged from Level 3 to 5 (prospective cohort to case series), and the quality ranged from poor to good (table 2).

Table 1.

Summary of studies examining DMD exposure during pregnancy and conception in MS

graphic file with name znl03512-0269-t01.jpg

Abbreviations: DMD = disease-modifying drug; GA = glatiramer acetate; IFN-β = interferon β LMP = last menstrual period; MS = multiple sclerosis.

a

Patients were compared with population estimates instead of individual subjects recruited as controls.

b

Studies with potential conflicts of interest due to direct funding support from the pharmaceutical manufacturer.

c

Studies with unknown/unclear conflicts of interest.

d

Studies with potential conflicts of interest due to employment of author by the pharmaceutical manufacturer.

Table 2.

Classification of studies based on level and quality of evidencea

graphic file with name znl03512-0269-t02.jpg

a

See Tables e-1 and e-2 for detailed level and quality of evidence criteria adapted from the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation evidence evaluation template.

Perinatal outcomes based on best evidence.

IFN-β.

Maternal exposure studies reported mixed findings regarding the risk of lower mean birth weight,6,16,18,22 lower mean gestational age,16,22 preterm birth,6,18 and spontaneous abortion.6,18 However, the best evidence (good-quality, Level 3) suggested that IFN-β exposure was associated with lower mean birth weight, shorter mean birth length, and preterm birth (<37 weeks) but not with spontaneous abortion, cesarean delivery, or low birth weight (defined as <2,500 g) (table 3).18 Fair-quality level 3 evidence studies showed no increased risk of lower mean gestational age16 or congenital anomalies6 in IFN-β-exposed births (table 3). Descriptively, the incidence of therapeutic abortion was higher in IFN-β-exposed vs IFN-β-unexposed pregnancies but lower than that for the general population.18,22,28

Table 3.

Perinatal outcomes from the better quality studies (fair and good) comparing DMD-exposed and DMD-unexposed mothers with MS and the level of evidencea

graphic file with name znl03512-0269-t03.jpg

Abbreviations: CI = confidence interval; DMD = disease-modifying drug; MS = multiple sclerosis; OR = odds ratio.

a

No study was rated as excellent. See Tables e-1 and e-2 for detailed level and quality of evidence criteria adapted from the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation Evidence Evaluation Template. Case series studies were not used to complete this table because of the absence of a suitable control group for comparison. We assumed that p > 0.05 when studies commented in their Results or Discussion sections that there was no difference between the groups but did not specifically provide an OR or p value.

b

Level of evidence: 3 = prospective cohort study.

c

This study was probably underpowered (IFN-β n = 69 and GA n = 31)6 to adequately assess the risk of congenital anomaly because the incidence is approximately 3% in newborns from the general population.30

GA.

Based on fair-quality Level 3 evidence, GA exposure was not associated with lower mean birth weight, lower mean gestational age, preterm birth (<37 weeks), congenital anomaly, or spontaneous abortion (table 3).6

Natalizumab.

From only one fair-quality Level 3 evidence study of natalizumab, exposure was not associated with shorter mean birth length, lower mean birth weight, or lower mean gestational age (table 3).17

Mitoxantrone and fingolimod.

No identified studies assessed the safety of mitoxantrone or fingolimod exposure.

Paternal DMD use.

Forty-six pregnancies were fathered by 32 men with MS who conceived offspring while being treated with a DMD, resulting in birth weights and lengths comparable to those of the general population (table 1).21 Descriptively, the risk of congenital anomaly and spontaneous abortion was similar to those for pregnancies of mothers from the general population.21

Developmental outcomes.

Two studies reported no increased risk of developmental abnormalities associated with IFN-β exposure,18,22 although follow-up was limited to 1 year in one study22 and a median follow-up of 2.1 years in the other.18 One developmental abnormality (inadequate language performance) was described in a case series (Level 5 evidence) of 11 newborns exposed to GA for at least 7 months of gestation.25 No other studies examining longer-term developmental outcomes were found.

DISCUSSION

Based on an overall assessment of the literature, the following class of recommendation14 was assigned to each DMD for the following reasons:

  • IFN-β: Class III. Evidence from some studies suggests potential harm, specifically lower mean birth weight, shorter mean birth length and preterm birth.

  • GA: Indeterminate. Further research is needed because results are not compelling; 3 of the 4 existing human studies of GA were small case series.

  • Natalizumab: Indeterminate. Further research is needed because results are not compelling.

  • Mitoxantrone: Class III. Animal studies and human case reports suggest potential harm with no controlled human studies to date.

  • Fingolimod: Indeterminate. Further research is needed because the drug only recently entered the market.

Evidence on other DMDs, paternal exposure to DMDs around the time of conception (poor-quality, Level 4 evidence),21 or longer-term developmental outcomes18,20,24 remains extremely limited.

Of interest, although most pregnant women with MS exposed to IFN-β discontinued therapy early in pregnancy, IFN-β was associated with prematurity and decreased fetal growth, outcomes often associated with adverse events occurring later in pregnancy. Because the first trimester of pregnancy is characterized by rapid cell division and precisely choreographed gene expression that lays the foundation for later fetal growth and development,31 it is entirely possible that early IFN-β exposure may have affected these early processes to cause later prematurity and decreased growth.

Emerging research (published in abstract form only) from 2010 and 2011 conference proceedings regarding IFN-β and GA exposure during pregnancy,3235 has been largely consistent with the analyzed results of this systematic review. For natalizumab, a case series of 277 exposed pregnancies to mothers with MS found 31 spontaneous abortions and 23 congenital anomalies.36 For fingolimod, 34 exposed pregnancies resulted in 1 case of tibial malformation, 1 case of tetralogy of Fallot (a congenital heart defect), and 5 spontaneous abortions37; authors from both studies concluded that small numbers limited conclusions at present.36,37

Women with MS should still be advised to discontinue DMDs if they are planning to conceive. After unintentional DMD exposure during pregnancy, women should consider discontinuation of their MS drugs. However, mitoxantrone aside, there is currently a lack of evidence to strongly support consideration of pregnancy termination after paternal or maternal exposure to the MS DMDs. Future research should further explore long-term development in offspring exposed to DMDs.

Supplementary Material

Data Supplement
Abstract in Arabic

GLOSSARY

DMD

disease-modifying drug

GA

glatiramer acetate

IFN-β

interferon β

ILCOR

International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation

MS

multiple sclerosis

Footnotes

Supplemental data at www.neurology.org

AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS

E. Lu: design and conceptualization of the study, analysis and interpretation of the data, drafting and revising the manuscript. B.W. Wang: analysis and interpretation of the data, revising the manuscript. C. Guimond: interpretation of the data, revising the manuscript. Dr. Synnes: design of the study, interpretation of the data, revising the manuscript. Dr. Sadovnick: conceptualization of the study, interpretation of the data, revising the manuscript. Dr. Tremlett: design and conceptualization of the study, analysis and interpretation of the data, drafting and revising the manuscript.

DISCLOSURE

E. Lu is funded by the University of British Columbia (Graduate Entrance Scholarship and Faculty of Medicine Graduate Award), Canadian Institutes of Health Research (Canada Graduate Scholarship: Master's Award), and the Multiple Sclerosis Society of Canada (MSc and PhD Research Studentships). B.W. Wang is funded by the Albert and Mary Steiner Summer Research Award and the Canadian Institutes for Health Research (Professional Student Research Award). C. Guimond reports no disclosures. A. Synnes reports no disclosures. D. Sadovnick has received research support from the MS Society of Canada Scientific Research Foundation, and CIHR and speaker honoraria and/or travel expenses to attend conferences from Biogen-Idec, Merck-Serono, Teva Neurosciences, and Bayer. H. Tremlett is funded by the Multiple Sclerosis Society of Canada (Don Paty Career Development Award) and is a Michael Smith Foundation for Health Research Scholar and the Canada Research Chair for Neuroepidemiology and Multiple Sclerosis. She has also received research support from the US National Multiple Sclerosis Society, CIHR, and UK MS Trust; speaker honoraria and/or travel expenses to speak at conferences from the Consortium of MS Centres, US National MS Society, Swiss Multiple Sclerosis Society, the University of British Columbia Multiple Sclerosis Research Program, Bayer Pharmaceuticals (2010, invited speaker, honoraria declined), and Teva Pharmaceuticals (2011, invited speaker). Unless otherwise stated, all speaker honoraria are either donated to an MS charity or to an unrestricted grant for use by her research group. Go to Neurology.org for full disclosures.

REFERENCES

  • 1. Compston A, Coles A. Multiple sclerosis. Lancet 2008;372:1502–1517 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Freedman MS, Hughes B, Mikol DD, et al. Efficacy of disease-modifying therapies in relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis: a systematic comparison. Eur Neurol 2008;60:1–11 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Martindale: The Complete Drug Reference, 35th ed. London: Pharmaceutical Press; 2008 [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Hellwig K, Brune N, Haghikia A, et al. Reproductive counselling, treatment and course of pregnancy in 73 German MS patients. Acta Neurol Scand 2008;118:24–28 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Henshaw SK. Unintended pregnancy in the United States. Fam Plann Perspect 1998;30:24–29 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Weber-Schoendorfer C, Schaefer C. Multiple sclerosis, immunomodulators, and pregnancy outcome: a prospective observational study. Mult Scler 2009;15:1037–1042 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Teva Pharmaceuticals Copaxone (glatiramer acetate) [online]. Available at: www.copaxone.com/pdf/prescribinginformation.pdf Accessed March 14, 2010
  • 8. US Food and Drug Administration Content and format of labeling for human prescription drug and biological products; requirements for pregnancy and lactation labeling [online]. Available at: edocket.access.gpo.gov/2008/pdf/E8-11806.pdf Accessed March 14, 2010 [PubMed]
  • 9. Biogen Idec Avonex (interferon beta-1a) [online]. Available at: www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2007/103628s5115lbl.pdf Accessed March 14, 2010
  • 10. Bayer HealthCare Betaseron (interferon beta-1b) [online]. Available at: berlex.bayerhealthcare.com/html/products/pi/Betaseron_PI.pdf Accessed March 14, 2010
  • 11. Biogen Idec/Elan Pharmaceuticals I. Tysabri (natalizumab) [online]. Available at: www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2006/125104s015lbl.pdf Accessed March 14, 2010
  • 12. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp. Gilenya (fingolimod) [online]. Available at: www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2010/022527s000lbl.pdf Accessed March 14, 2010
  • 13. EMD Serono I/C. Novantrone (mitoxantrone) [online]. Available at: www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2009/019297s030s031lbl.pdf Accessed March 14, 2010
  • 14. Sayre MR, O'Connor RE, Atkins DL, et al. Part 2: Evidence evaluation and management of potential or perceived conflicts of interest: 2010 American Heart Association guidelines for cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care. Circulation 2010;122:S657–S664 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Shea BJ, Hamel C, Wells GA, et al. AMSTAR is a reliable and valid measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews. J Clin Epidemiol 2009;62:1013–1020 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Boskovic R, Wide R, Wolpin J, et al. The reproductive effects of beta interferon therapy in pregnancy: a longitudinal cohort. Neurology 2005;65:807–811 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Hellwig K, Haghikia A, Gold R. Pregnancy and natalizumab: results of an observational study in 35 accidental pregnancies during natalizumab treatment. Mult Scler 2011;17:958–963 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Amato MP, Portaccio E, Ghezzi A, et al. Pregnancy and fetal outcomes after interferon-beta exposure in multiple sclerosis. Neurology 2010;75:1794–1802 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Fernandez Liguori N, Klajn D, Acion L, et al. Epidemiological characteristics of pregnancy, delivery, and birth outcome in women with multiple sclerosis in Argentina (EMEMAR study). Mult Scler 2009;15:555–562 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Lu E, Dahlgren L, Sadovnick D, Sayao A, Synnes A, Tremlett H. Perinatal outcomes in women with multiple sclerosis exposed to disease-modifying drugs. Mult Scler 2012;18:460–467 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Hellwig K, Haghikia A, Gold R. Parenthood and immunomodulation in patients with multiple sclerosis. J Neurol 2010;257:580–583 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Patti F, Cavallaro T, Lo Fermo S, et al. Is in utero early-exposure to interferon beta a risk factor for pregnancy outcomes in multiple sclerosis? J Neurol 2008;255:1250–1253 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. De Las Heras V, De Andres C, Tellez N, et al. Pregnancy in multiple sclerosis patients treated with immunomodulators prior to or during part of the pregnancy: a descriptive study in the Spanish population. Mult Scler 2007;13:981–984 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Fragoso YD, Finkelsztejn A, Comini-Frota ER, et al. Pregnancy and multiple sclerosis: the initial results from a Brazilian database. Arq Neuropsiquiatr 2009;67:657–660 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Fragoso YD, Finkelsztejn A, Kaimen-Maciel DR, et al. Long-term use of glatiramer acetate by 11 pregnant women with multiple sclerosis: a retrospective, multicentre case series. CNS Drugs 2010;24:969–976 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Finkelsztejn A, Fragoso YD, Ferreira ML, et al. The Brazilian database on pregnancy in multiple sclerosis. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 2011;113:277–280 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Salminen HJ, Leggett H, Boggild M. Glatiramer acetate exposure in pregnancy: preliminary safety and birth outcomes. J Neurol 2011;257:2020–2023 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Sandberg-Wollheim M, Frank D, Goodwin TM, et al. Pregnancy outcomes during treatment with interferon β-1a in patients with multiple sclerosis. Neurology 2005;65:802–806 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Sandberg-Wollheim M, Alteri E, Stam Moraga M, Kornmann G. Pregnancy outcomes in multiple sclerosis following subcutaneous interferon beta-1a therapy. Mult Scler 2011;17:423–430 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Lowry RB. Congenital anomalies surveillance in Canada. Can J Public Health 2008;99:483–485 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Cunningham FG, Leveno KJ, Bloom SL, Hauth JC, Rouse DJ, Spong CY. Fetal growth and development. In: Williams Obstetrics, 23 ed. New York: McGraw-Hill; 2010 [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Giannini M, Portaccio E, Ghezzi A, et al. Pregnancy and fetal outcomes after glatiramer acetate exposure in patients with multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler 2011;17(suppl 10): S303 Abstract [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Hellwig K, Haghikia A, Gold R. Multiple sclerosis and pregnancy experience from a nationwide database. Neurology 2011;76(suppl 4):A273 Abstract [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Foulds P, Richman S, Glick G, Onigman T, Hyde R. Pregnancy outcomes from the Avonex® (interferon beta-1a) pregnancy exposure registry. Mult Scler 2010;16(suppl 10):S315 Abstract [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Miller AE, Reardon JL. Use of glatiramer acetate during pregnancy: offering women a choice. Neurology 2010;74(suppl 2):A554 Abstract [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Cristiano LM, Bozic C, Bloomgren G. Preliminary evaluation of pregnancy outcomes from the Tysabri (natalizumab) pregnancy exposure registry. Mult Scler 2011;17(suppl 10):A457 Abstract [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Collins W, Francis G, Koren G, et al. Lack of interaction between fingolimod (FTY720) and oral contraceptives, and pregnancy experience in the clinical program of fingolimod in multiple sclerosis. Neurology 2011;76(suppl 4):A609 Abstract [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Data Supplement
Abstract in Arabic

Articles from Neurology are provided here courtesy of American Academy of Neurology

RESOURCES