Skip to main content
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy logoLink to Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
. 1978 Dec;14(6):824–828. doi: 10.1128/aac.14.6.824

Comparison of 5-Episisomicin (Sch 22591), Gentamicin, Sisomicin, and Tobramycin in Treatment of Experimental Pseudomonas Infections in Mice

Richard V Goering 1, Christine C Sanders 1, W Eugene Sanders Jr 1
PMCID: PMC352564  PMID: 742870

Abstract

Sch 22591 (5-episisomicin), gentamicin, sisomicin, and tobramycin were compared for their ability to protect mice from lethal intraperitoneal challenge with 12 Pseudomonas strains, all susceptible to each of the aminoglycosides (minimal inhibitory concentrations and minimal bactericidal concentrations were ≤6.2 μg/ml). Median 50% protective doses were 5.8, 6.4, 7.7, and 17.8 mg/kg for Sch 22591, tobramycin, sisomicin, and gentamicin, respectively. Those for Sch 22591 were significantly lower than gentamicin in five protection tests and significantly lower than both gentamicin and tobramycin in one test. Microbial analysis of the therapeutic effect indicated that protection from lethality by each of the four aminoglycosides was associated with either a complete eradication or a reduction in the number of challenge bacteria in both the heart blood and peritoneum. In rare instances, challenge isolates exhibiting decreased susceptibility to one or more of the aminoglycosides were recovered from animals. However, this in vivo selection of resistance did not appear related to either the aminoglycoside used in therapy or the outcome of therapy, and resistant isolates were recovered as frequently from untreated animals as from those receiving one of the four aminoglycosides.

Full text

PDF
824

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Davis S. D. Activity of gentamicin, tobramycin, polymyxin B, and colistimethate in mouse protection tests with Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1975 Jul;8(1):50–53. doi: 10.1128/aac.8.1.50. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Meyers B. R., Hirschman S. Z. Comparison of activity of sisomicin and gentamicin in mouse protection tests with gram-negative bacilli. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1976 Aug;10(2):384–386. doi: 10.1128/aac.10.2.384. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Sanders C. C., Sanders W. E., Jr, Goering R. V. In vitro studies with Sch 21420 and Sch 22591: activity in comparison with six other aminoglycosides and synergy with penicillin against enterococci. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1978 Aug;14(2):178–184. doi: 10.1128/aac.14.2.178. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Waitz J. A., Miller G. H., Moss E., Jr, Chiu P. J. Chemotherapeutic evaluation of 5-episisomicin (Sch 22591), a new semisynthetic aminoglycoside. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1978 Jan;13(1):41–48. doi: 10.1128/aac.13.1.41. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Waitz J. A., Moss E. L., Jr, Drube C. G., Weinstein M. J. Comparative activity of sisomicin, gentamicin, kanamycin, and tobramycin. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1972 Dec;2(6):431–437. doi: 10.1128/aac.2.6.431. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES