Skip to main content
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy logoLink to Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
. 1979 Feb;15(2):200–203. doi: 10.1128/aac.15.2.200

Treatment of Experimental Staphylococcus aureus Abscesses: Comparison of Cefazolin, Cephalothin, Cefoxitin, and Cefamandole

Donald Kaye 1, James N Parsons 1, Jaime Carrizosa 1, William D Kobasa 1
PMCID: PMC352632  PMID: 426513

Abstract

Cefazolin (CZ), cephalothin (CF), cefoxitin (CX), and cefamandole (CM) were evaluated in therapy of Staphylococcus aureus infection produced in perforated table tennis balls placed intraperitoneally in rabbits. Four weeks after placement of two balls in each rabbit, a beta-lactamase producing strain of S. aureus was injected into one of the balls. Twenty-four hours later therapy was initiated with 40 mg of CZ or 80 mg of CF, CX, or CM per kg intramuscularly every 6 h. After 24 h of treatment, the mean log10 colony-forming units per ml were 7.1 for CZ, 6.7 for CF, 6.5 for CX, and 7.2 for CM. After 72 h the mean log10 colony-forming units per ml were 5.0 for CZ, 4.1 for CF, 3.6 for CX, and 5.6 for CM. After 8 days, the titers were 1.6/ml for CZ, 1.0 for CF, 1.9 for CX, and 3.6 for CM. CZ serum levels were about double CF and CX levels and about two-thirds of CM levels. In sterile ball fluid CZ and CM levels were more than double CF or CX concentrations. Concentrations of all four antibiotics were lower in infected balls.

Full text

PDF
200

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bryant R. E., Alford R. H. Unsuccessful treatment of staphylococcal endocarditis with cefazolin. JAMA. 1977 Feb 7;237(6):569–570. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Carrizosa J., Kaye D. Antibiotic synergism in enterococcal endocarditis. J Lab Clin Med. 1976 Jul;88(1):132–141. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Carrizosa J., Santoro J., Kaye D. Treatment of experimental Staphylococcus aureus endocarditis: comparison of cephalothin, cefazolin, and methicillin. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1978 Jan;13(1):74–77. doi: 10.1128/aac.13.1.74. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Gerding D. N., Hall W. H., Schierl E. A., Manion R. E. Cephalosporin and aminoglycoside concentrations in peritoneal capsular fluid in rabbits. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1976 Dec;10(6):902–911. doi: 10.1128/aac.10.6.902. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Levison M. E., Levison S. P., Ries K., Kaye D. Pharmacology of cefazolin in patients with normal and abnormal renal function. J Infect Dis. 1973 Oct;128(Suppl):S354–S357. doi: 10.1093/infdis/128.supplement_2.s354. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Regamey C., Libke R. D., Engelking E. R., Clarke J. T., Kirby M. M. Inactivation of cefazolin, cephaloridine, and cephalothin by methicillin-sensitive and methicillin-resistant strains of Staphylococcus aureus. J Infect Dis. 1975 Mar;131(3):291–294. doi: 10.1093/infdis/131.3.291. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. WICK W. E., BONIECE W. S. IN VITRO AND IN VIVO LABORATORY EVALUATION OF CEPHALOGLYCIN AND CEPHALORIDINE. Appl Microbiol. 1965 Mar;13:248–253. doi: 10.1128/am.13.2.248-253.1965. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES