Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy logoLink to Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
. 1979 Jun;15(6):769–774. doi: 10.1128/aac.15.6.769

Rapid Antimicrobial Susceptibility Test Using Tetrazolium Reduction

Raymond C Bartlett 1, Mary F Mazens 1
PMCID: PMC352756  PMID: 475361

Abstract

A rapid method of antimicrobial susceptibility testing has been developed, which uses a modified microdilution procedure and an inoculum of 107 bacteria per ml. Results are determined within 4 h with an indicator consisting of 2(p-iodophenyl)-3(p-nitrophenyl)-5-phenyltetrazolium chloride. The precipitation of a red formazan by bacteria uninhibited by antimicrobials is accelerated by the addition of phenazine methosulfate. Isolates are classified as resistant, indeterminate, or susceptible, based on growth in up to two antimicrobial concentrations which conform closely to concentrations which correlate with the millimeter breakpoints used in the Bauer-Kirby method. Results of testing 10 antimicrobial agents against 1,126 isolates were compared with results obtained when the Bauer-Kirby method and the agar dilution procedure were used as reference methods. Enterococci were excluded because of false resistance. Discrepancies were classified as very major (false susceptibility), major (false resistance), and minor (combinations of susceptibility or resistance with indeterminate results). The rapid method versus the agar dilution method yielded 2.3% very major, 0.7% major, and 2.9% minor discrepancies, for a total of 6.0%. Of 58 organism-antimicrobial agent combinations tested, 23 displayed 1% very major discrepancies between the rapid method and the agar dilution method. Six were not therapeutically important. The remainder involved Staphylococcus aureus, Staphylococcus epidermidis, Acinetobacter sp., and most organisms tested with chloramphenicol. It is suggested that adjustments in antibiotic concentrations and/or inoculum size may eliminate these discrepancies. The rapid method appeared economical when compared with Autobac 1 and the Bauer-Kirby procedure.

Full text

PDF
769

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Barry A. L., Joyce L. J., Adams A. P., Benner E. J. Rapid determination of antimicrobial susceptibility for urgent clinical situations. Am J Clin Pathol. 1973 May;59(5):693–699. doi: 10.1093/ajcp/59.5.693. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bartlett R. C., Mazens M., Greenfield B. Acceleration of tetrazolium reduction by bacteria. J Clin Microbiol. 1976 Mar;3(3):327–329. doi: 10.1128/jcm.3.3.327-329.1976. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bauer A. W., Kirby W. M., Sherris J. C., Turck M. Antibiotic susceptibility testing by a standardized single disk method. Am J Clin Pathol. 1966 Apr;45(4):493–496. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Boyle V. J., Fancher M. E., Ross R. W., Jr Rapid, modified Kirby-Bauer susceptibility test with single, high-concentration antimicrobial disks. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1973 Mar;3(3):418–424. doi: 10.1128/aac.3.3.418. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Brown W. J., Sautter R. L. Five-hour minimal inhibitory concentration test of four antimicrobial agents for Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1977 Jun;11(6):1064–1066. doi: 10.1128/aac.11.6.1064. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Liberman D. F., Robertson R. G. Evaluation of a rapid Bauer-Kirby antibiotic susceptibility determination. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1975 Mar;7(3):250–255. doi: 10.1128/aac.7.3.250. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Lindberg A. A., Nord C. E., Dahlbäck A. Rapid identification and antibiotic sensitivity testing of bacteria isolated from clinical infections. Med Microbiol Immunol. 1977 May 18;163(1):13–24. doi: 10.1007/BF02126705. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Lund M. E., Blazevic D. J., Matsen J. M. Rapid gentamicin bioassay using a multiple-antibiotic-resistant strain of Klebsiella pneumoniae. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1973 Nov;4(5):569–573. doi: 10.1128/aac.4.5.569. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. McGowan J. E., Jr, Ayres C., Sabath L. D. Rapid semiquantitative testing of antibiotic susceptibility: use of a multicell disk elution system. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1975 May;7(5):543–548. doi: 10.1128/aac.7.5.543. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Mogyoros M., Morgan J. R., Smith J. A. Evaluation of the Autobac 1 susceptibility testing system in a clinical diagnostic laboratory. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1977 Apr;11(4):750–752. doi: 10.1128/aac.11.4.750. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Ryan R., Tilton R. C. Rapid method for determining the minimum inhibitory concentration of ampicillin for Haemophilus influenzae. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1977 Jan;11(1):114–117. doi: 10.1128/aac.11.1.114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES