Abstract
Background
Germline TP53 mutations predispose to early onset breast cancer (BC) in women and are associated with the Li Fraumeni syndrome. Published data on the pathological characteristics of breast cancer among women with TP53 mutations is limited.
Methods
We retrospectively reviewed clinical records of women who had genetic testing for suspected germline TP53 mutations and who were diagnosed with BC between 2000 to 2011. The pathological characteristics of the breast tumors from women testing positive (cases) for a mutation were compared to those testing negative (controls).
Results
Patients who tested positive for germline TP53 mutations (N=30) were compared to (N=79) controls. Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) amplification and/or overexpression was found in 67% of the tumors from the cases, compared to 25% for the controls (p=0.0001). Among patients with a mutation, 70% had estrogen receptor and/or progesterone receptor positive tumors, compared to 68% in the control group (p= 0.87). After adjusting for age at BC diagnosis, having a HER2 positive tumor increased the odds of testing positive for a germline TP53 mutation (OR, 6.9, 95% CI, 2.6 to 18.2). For each yearly increments in age at BC diagnosis, there was decreased likelihood of having a TP53 mutation by 5% (OR=0.95, CI 0.91 to 0.99).
Conclusion
This study suggests an association between germline TP53 mutations and early onset HER2 positive breast cancer. If confirmed in a larger cohort, these results could guide genetic testing strategies, lead to chemoprevention trials incorporating HER2 targeted therapies, and elucidate some of the molecular pathways involved in breast cancer.
INTRODUCTION
Germline TP53 mutations are the primary cause of Li Fraumeni syndrome (LFS), which is a cancer predisposition syndrome primarily associated with breast cancer, sarcomas, brain tumors, and adrenocortical carcinoma 1. The risk of cancer is higher for women than men and is mostly the result of the increased frequency of breast cancer among women with LFS 2–5. Published data on the specific clinical and pathological characteristics among women with breast cancer and germline TP53 mutations is limited. In the absence of a specific breast cancer phenotype, there remains little guidance for testing patients with early onset breast cancer besides the strict classical diagnostic criteria requiring a strong family history or personal history of LFS associated cancers 6.
Inherited mutations in BRCA1 or BRCA2 genes are the most important predictors of early onset breast cancer as they are found in 5% to 30% of cases unselected for family history depending on the population 7. The American Society of Clinical Oncology Statement on Genetic Testing emphasizes the utility of genetic testing as part of a comprehensive cancer risk assessment, especially where there is a clinical benefit to the patient or family. Most recently the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) has added breast cancer diagnosed before the age of 30 as an indication for germline TP53 mutation testing 8–10. Based on our preliminary observation and a recently published study, we hypothesized that patients with breast cancer and a germline TP53 mutation have an increased preponderance of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER-2) amplified breast cancer subtype11, 12.
To better describe the genotype-phenotype characteristics of women with breast cancer and a germline TP53 mutation, we performed a retrospective chart review at MD Anderson Cancer Center and the University of Chicago of all women with a known history of breast cancer that have undergone genetic testing for suspected germline TP53 mutations, and have previously tested negative for BRCA1 and 2 mutation. The pathological characteristics of the tumors from women testing positive for germlineTP53 mutation were then compared to those of the women testing negative. We focused on specific histological features, estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR) and HER-2 status.
METHODS
Patients
Women who underwent genetic testing for suspected germline TP53 mutations and carry a diagnosis of breast cancer were identified. The majority of patients were referred for genetic counseling to MD Anderson Cancer Center or the University of Chicago by their medical or surgical oncologist. A total of 109 women were evaluated between 2000 to 2011, and were included in the analysis. Most met the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) consortium guidelines for germline TP53 mutational analysis testing based on their personal and/or family history of cancer 8. The following exclusion criteria were applied: male sex, incomplete pathological records, unknown ER, PR, or HER-2 status, non-invasive breast tumors, phyllodes tumors, or sarcomas of the breast, and known BRCA1 or 2 germline mutations. The patient’s electronic medical records were reviewed to extract data on clinical characteristics, including ethnicity, age, and other malignancies. The institutional review board approved the retrospective review of the medical records for the purposes of this study.
Pathology
Information regarding the histologic type of breast cancer; tumor grade using the modified Black's nuclear grading system; and ER, PR, and HER-2 status of breast cancer samples were obtained from the patients’ pathology reports. Invasive breast cancer specimens that were routinely evaluated for ER, PR, using immunohistochemistry (IHC) and HER-2 status using IHC and/or Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) were included. A positive HER-2 status was defined as a score of 3 + by IHC and/or a ratio of 2.2 or more by FISH. A negative status was defined as a score of 0 or 1+ by IHC, and/or a ratio of <1.8 by FISH. A FISH analysis was not available for all patients and depended on their IHC results.
TP53 germline mutation analysis
Women seen through the clinical cancer genetics service at MD Anderson Cancer Center or the University of Chicago and who had clinical indication of germline TP53 mutation due to personal and/or family history were primarily tested at outside CLIA certified laboratories. Their TP53 mutation reports were reviewed and considered for this analysis. Women that were part of a LFS long-term study headed by Dr.Louise C. Strong, had their TP53 mutation analysis performed at MD Anderson Cancer Center research laboratory as previously described 13. This study was approved by the institutional review board. Briefly, peripheral blood samples were collected from participants and DNA was extracted and screened for mutations along all coding exons (2–11) and associated splice junctions of the TP53 gene. Results were confirmed by a second independent sample tested at a different time. In some instances, participants had clinical testing done either prior to or after having research TP53 mutation testing. All patients in this study consented for genetic testing.
Statistics
We used Pearson's χ2 test (or Fisher’s exact test where appropriate) to test for associations between the receptor type (ER, PR, or HER-2), tumor grade, and ethnicity, according to TP53 mutational status. The Mann-Whitney U test was used to test for differences in age at diagnosis by TP53 mutational status. A p value of < 0.05, using the two-sided test was considered statistically significant.
A multicovariate logistic regression model was used to estimate the odds ratio (ORs) and the corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI) for HER2 in predicting TP53 mutational status in patients, adjusting for age. All the statistical analyses were done using SAS 9.1.3 for Windows.
RESULTS
A total of 109 female breast cancer patients who underwent testing for germline TP53 mutations were identified. All the patients included had invasive carcinoma. A total of 30 patients (28%) tested positive for a TP53 germline mutation (cases). Patient characteristics were summarized for patients with and without a TP53 germline mutation (Table1). There was a significant difference in regards to age at diagnosis of breast cancer among the two groups, with a median age of 31.5 years for the patients with a germline mutation compared to 40 years for the patients testing negative (controls) (p=0.035). The self-described ancestries of the two groups were comparable with the majority of the patients being of European ancestry (67% and 71% in cases and controls, respectively). Hispanic patients made up 27% of the group with a germline mutation compared to 16% of the control group (p =0.64). None of the 30 patients with a mutation were family members in this study.
Table 1.
Cases n=30 |
Controls n= 79 |
p value | |
---|---|---|---|
Median age at diagnosis (range yrs) | 31.5 years | 40 years | 0.035 |
(20–59) | (20–75) | ||
Ancestry N (%): | 0.64 | ||
European | 20 (67%) | 56 (71%) | |
Hispanic | 8(26%) | 13(16%) | |
African American | 2 (7%) | 5(6%) | |
Asian | - | 3(4%) | |
Other | - | 2(3%) |
The pathological features of the tumors are summarized (Table 2). Among the women with a germline TP53 the prevalence of ER and/or PR positive tumors was 70 % (21/30) compared to 68% (54/79) in the controls (p= 0.87). In contrast, the presence of HER2 positive tumors was significantly different between the groups, 67% (20/30) in the cases compared to 25% (20/79) in the controls (p=0.0001). Nine (30%) patients with a germline mutation had estrogen receptor (ER) and/or progesterone receptor (PR) positive and HER2 negative tumors compared to 43 (54%) in the control group (p=0.02). We found one patient with triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) (ER−/PR−/HER2−) in the cases while 20% of the controls had TNBC (p=0.04). Among the patients with a germline mutation who had bilateral breast cancers and HER2 positive tumors (N=4), both breasts contained HER2 positive disease in all but one patient who’s tumor was equivocal by IHC (2+) and non-amplified by FISH; these were not counted as separate cases for our analysis. None of the controls with HER2 positive breast cancer had bilateral disease.
Table 2.
Cases n=30 |
Controls n=79 |
p value | |
---|---|---|---|
Nuclear grade n(%) | |||
3 | 19 (63%) | 42 (53%) | 0.29 |
2 | 7 (23%) | 28 (35%) | |
1 | - | 4 (5%) | |
Unknown grade | 4 (13%) | 5 (6%) | |
ER+ or PR+/HER2− | 9(30%) | 43(54%) | 0.02 |
ER±/PR±/HER2 + | 20 (67%) | 20 (25%) | 0.0001 |
ER−/PR−/HER2− | 1(3%) | 16 (20%) | 0.04 |
Abbreviation: ER, Estrogen receptor; PR, progesterone receptor; HER2, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2.
A total of 10 out of 30 patients with a germline mutation underwent contralateral prophylactic mastectomy at the time of breast cancer or LFS diagnosis, and had no evidence of contralateral disease. Of the remaining 20 patients, 75% (N=15) had bilateral breast pathology. Six patients had DCIS, 2 patients had phyllodes tumors and 7 patients had IDC in both breasts. The most common cancers diagnosed in addition to breast cancer were sarcomas (N=6), tumors of the CNS (N=3), and adrenal carcinomas (N=3).
The germline mutation for each patient with documented histology is shown in table 3. The majority were missense mutations (70%), and were mostly located in the major and minor DNA binding domains. The remainders were nonsense (13%), frameshift (7%), deletion (7%), and splice (3%) mutations.
Table 3.
Pati ent |
TP53 mutation | HER2 IHC/ FISH |
Other cancers | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Gene bank ref seq X54156a |
Coding DNA sequenceb |
Mutation effect | |||
1 | g.13130 | c.451C>G | missense | 3+ /amplified | Bilateral breast cancer |
2 | g.14090_92 | c.763delATC | deletion | amplified | Astrocytoma/ phyllodes |
3 | g.14589 | c.918+1G>T | splice | 3+ | - |
4 | g.13152 | c.473G>A | missense | 3+ | Contra DCIS |
5 | g.13340 | c.580C>T | missense | 0 | Bilateral breast cancer |
6 | g.14070 | c.743G>A | missense | 3+ | GBM |
7 | g.14516 | c.847C>T | missense | 0 | - (Proph mast) |
8 | g.13203 | c.524G>A | missense | 2+/equivocal | liposarcoma |
9 | g.13419 | c.659A>G | missense | 0 | Adrenal carcinoma |
10 | g.13203 | c.524G>A | missense | 3 + | Bilateral breast cancer |
11 | g.12066 | c.142delG | frameshift | 3+ | Bilateral breast cancer |
12 | g.14070 | c.743G>A | missense | Amplified | - |
13 | g.13203 | c.524G>A | missense | Amplified | Multifocal breast ca/ contra DCIS |
14 | g.12113 | c.189delTinsAGA | frameshift | 3+ | - |
15 | Del E10–11 | large deletion no specific endpoint | deletion | Non-amplified | Sarcoma |
16 | g.13068 | c.389T>A | missense | 3+ | Contra DCIS |
17 | g.17602 | c.1024C>T | nonsense | 3+ | Contra DCIS |
18 | g.14501 | c.832C>G | missense | Non-amplified | (Proph mast);ovarian cystadenoma |
19 | g.14487 | c.818G>A | missense | 1+ | -(Proph mast) |
20 | g.13117 | c.438G>A | nonsense | 0 | (Proph mast);sarcoma, endometrial ca, RCC |
21 | g.14468 | c.799C>T | missense | 3+ | - |
22 | g.14502 | c.833C>T | missense | 3+ | - |
23 | g.14513 | c.844C>T | missense | 3+ | (Proph mast);adrenal ca, melanoma, thyroid ca |
24 | g.12108 | c.184G>T | nonsense | 2+/Amplified | Bilateral breast cancer |
25 | g.13116 | c.437G>A | nonsense | 3+ | Contra DCIS, colon ca; pancreatic ca |
26 | g.13419 | c.659A>C | missense | 1+ | Bilateral breast cancer; osteosarcoma |
27 | g.13203 | c.524G>A | missense | Non-amplified | Contra phyllodes, rhabdomyosarcoma |
28 | g.14060 | c.733G>A | missense | Amplified | Contra DCIS, astrocytoma, leiyomyosarcoma |
29 | g. 13346 | c.586C>T | missense | 3+/amplified | - (Proph mast) |
30 | g.13152 | c. 473G>A | missense | 3+ | - |
Abbreviation: aa, amino acid, HER2, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2; IHC, immunohistochemistry; FISH, fluorescence in situ hybridization; Contra, contralateral; DCIS, ductal carcinoma in situ; GBM, glioblastoma multiforme; proph, prophylactic; RCC, renal cell carcinoma; ca, cancer.
Accession X54156 Version X54156.1 source: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/x54156
Accession X02469 Version X02469.1 source: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/x02469
In the multicovariate logistic regression analysis, there was a statistically significant prediction for being a carrier for a TP53 germline mutation by age at diagnosis and HER2 status (p=0.02 and p<0.0001 respectively. For each year increase in age at breast cancer diagnosis, there is a decreased likelihood of having a TP53 mutation by 5% (OR=0.95, 95% CI 0.91 to 0.99). In young women (average age 38.5) diagnosed with breast cancer in this study, having a tumor that is positive for HER2 increases the odds of having a TP53 germline mutation by nearly 7 folds [OR, 6.9, 95% CI, 2.6 to 18.2 ; P< 0.0001].
DISCUSSION
In this case-control study, we found that patients with breast cancer and germline TP53 mutation had significantly higher prevalence of HER2 positive tumors compared to their counterparts who lacked the mutation. This is the largest study published to date describing this association. Interestingly, in patients with HER2 positive disease and contralateral breast cancer, the contralateral primary also had HER2 overexpression in all but one case, thus providing further support for the association between germline TP53 mutation and HER2 overexpression.
Our findings are in line with a recently published study by Wilson et al, where 9 patients with LFS and breast cancer were compared to a reference panel of patients with early onset breast cancer 12. HER2 was amplified in (83%) of the breast tumors from patients with LFS compared to (16%) of their control group. The slightly higher prevalence found in their study is probably related to the evaluation of HER2 status in the breast cancers (i.e. bilateral breast cancers in individual patients were counted as separate cases) as opposed to the prevalence per patient as done in our study. Interestingly, only one case of triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) was identified in the patients with a mutation in our series, this was significantly lower than in the controls; none were found in the study by Wilson and colleagues. It is important to note that patients with a known deleterious BRCA1 or 2 mutation were excluded from our study.
Furthermore, we found that in patients with an indication for germline TP53 testing, the odds of finding a germline mutation increases by almost 7 folds if their breast tumor overexpresses HER2. The likelihood of encountering a germline mutation also decreases by 5% with yearly increments in age at diagnosis. If confirmed in a larger series, we anticipate that these findings could be used to refine prediction models for germline TP53 testing in women with breast cancer.
There has been considerable interest in the role of p53 in breast cancer. Most of this work has centered on somatic TP53 mutations which are found in about 25% of breast cancer cases and are associated with a poor prognosis14. Previous work by Sorlie et al found a strong association between somatic TP53 mutations, HER2 positive and basal-like breast cancer subclasses 15. Specifically, mutated TP53 was found in 71% of HER2 positive subclasses, and 82% of basal like breast tumors. Other studies evaluating somatic TP53 mutations in breast tumors have also reported this interdependence between TP53 and HER2 16–18. While we did not find an association between TNBC and a germline TP53 mutation, our findings for mutated germline TP53 support an association with HER2 overexpression. This may be partly explained by differences between the somatic and germline TP53 mutations. Further work examining these differences may help elucidate how mutations in TP53 can influence the subsequent development of different breast cancer subtypes. Most recently, loss of p53 function has been shown to increase cross-talks between the estrogen receptor and EGFR/HER2 pathways in p53 mutant cells leading to tamoxifen resistance 19.
Interestingly, both ERBB2 (the proto-oncogene encoding HER2) and TP53 are located on chromosome 17, (17q 21 and 17p13.1respectively) 16, 20. How this proximity may affect the potential interaction between these two genes is largely unknown.
The international agency for research on cancer (IARC) TP53 database (http://www-p53.iarc.fr/) compiles data from published literature on germline and somatic TP53 mutations and this information is available publically. Their analysis shows that breast cancer is the most common cancer type in women with germline TP53 mutations. Moreover, missense mutations account for more than 70% of all cancer cases they analyzed, followed by nonsense and splice mutations 21. As expected, the most common mutations seen in our cohort were missense mutations 3, 22. Deletions, and frame shift mutations were also detected. Her2 amplification was encountered in all mutation types in this patient population. The same mutation at R175H, a mutation thought to be associated with gain of function of p53 was found in 4 patients21. Interestingly, in 2 patients it was associated with HER2 amplification, while normal and equivocal in the remaining 2 patients respectively (table 3). Further mechanistic studies evaluating the effect of a specific mutation and its ensuing effect on breast cancer phenotype are clearly needed.
Another expected finding from our study was the development of subsequent primaries, specifically, contralateral breast cancers, sarcomas and tumors of the CNS. These findings certainly provide support for aggressive screening of the contralateral breast or consideration for prophylactic mastectomy 23, 24. Further work looking into EGFR/HER2 pathway activation in other tumors from patients with LFS is certainly warranted.
Our study is limited by its retrospective nature, small numbers, and lack of independent pathological review of all the breast cancer cases. Further work needs to be done to confirm these findings. If confirmed, they could potentially enhance genetic testing strategies for patients with limited family history and early onset breast cancer 6. From our data, a HER2 overexpressing tumor in a young woman should be alerting to the higher probability of having a germline TP53 mutation.
Furthermore, chemo-preventative trials incorporating anti-HER2 therapies or potentially anti-HER2 vaccines could be offered to patients with a germline TP53 mutation 25. Certainly this would be of great interest if similar activation of the HER2 pathway is found in tumors of the CNS, where screening and therapeutic options are limited 26. Finally, determining how these germline mutations lead to a specific breast cancer subtype could help elucidate the role of p53 in breast cancer and help guide therapeutic strategies.
Acknowledgments
Funding: This work was funded by NIH P01 CA34936 for Louise C. Strong.
REFERENCES
- 1.Li FP, Fraumeni JF., Jr Rhabdomyosarcoma in children: epidemiologic study and identification of a familial cancer syndrome. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1969 Dec;43(6):1365–1373. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Birch JM, Blair V, Kelsey AM, et al. Cancer phenotype correlates with constitutional TP53 genotype in families with the Li-Fraumeni syndrome. Oncogene. 1998 Sep 3;17(9):1061–1068. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1202033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Petitjean A, Achatz MI, Borresen-Dale AL, Hainaut P, Olivier M. TP53 mutations in human cancers: functional selection and impact on cancer prognosis and outcomes. Oncogene. 2007 Apr 2;26(15):2157–2165. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1210302. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Hisada M, Garber JE, Fung CY, Fraumeni JF, Jr, Li FP. Multiple primary cancers in families with Li-Fraumeni syndrome. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1998 Apr 15;90(8):606–611. doi: 10.1093/jnci/90.8.606. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Olivier M, Goldgar DE, Sodha N, et al. Li-Fraumeni and related syndromes: correlation between tumor type, family structure, and TP53 genotype. Cancer Res. 2003 Oct 15;63(20):6643–6650. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Ruijs MW, Verhoef S, Rookus MA, et al. TP53 germline mutation testing in 180 families suspected of Li-Fraumeni syndrome: mutation detection rate and relative frequency of cancers in different familial phenotypes. J Med Genet. Jun;47(6):421–428. doi: 10.1136/jmg.2009.073429. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Fackenthal JD, Olopade OI. Breast cancer risk associated with BRCA1 and BRCA2 in diverse populations. Nat Rev Cancer. 2007 Dec;7(12):937–948. doi: 10.1038/nrc2054. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology: Genetic/Familial High Risk Assessment: Breast and Ovarian. 2010;v. 1. 2010 Available at: < http://www.nccn.org>. [Google Scholar]
- 9.Gonzalez KD, Noltner KA, Buzin CH, et al. Beyond Li Fraumeni Syndrome: clinical characteristics of families with p53 germline mutations. J Clin Oncol. 2009 Mar 10;27(8):1250–1256. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2008.16.6959. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Eeles RA. Germline mutations in the TP53 gene. Cancer Surv. 1995;25:101–124. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Melhem-Bertrandt ARK, Gutierrez-Barrera AM, Litton J, Strong LC, Olopade OI, Hortobagyi GN, Arun BK. Increased Rate of HER2-Positive Breast Cancers among Women with Germline TP53 Mutations. San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium. Vol 2010 [Google Scholar]
- 12.Wilson JR, Bateman AC, Hanson H, et al. A novel HER2-positive breast cancer phenotype arising from germline TP53 mutations. J Med Genet. Nov;47(11):771–774. doi: 10.1136/jmg.2010.078113. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Hwang SJ, Lozano G, Amos CI, Strong LC. Germline p53 mutations in a cohort with childhood sarcoma: sex differences in cancer risk. Am J Hum Genet. 2003 Apr;72(4):975–983. doi: 10.1086/374567. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Olivier M, Petitjean A, Marcel V, et al. Recent advances in p53 research: an interdisciplinary perspective. Cancer Gene Ther. 2009 Jan;16(1):1–12. doi: 10.1038/cgt.2008.69. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Sorlie T, Perou CM, Tibshirani R, et al. Gene expression patterns of breast carcinomas distinguish tumor subclasses with clinical implications. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001 Sep 11;98(19):10869–10874. doi: 10.1073/pnas.191367098. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Nakopoulou LL, Alexiadou A, Theodoropoulos GE, Lazaris AC, Tzonou A, Keramopoulos A. Prognostic significance of the co-expression of p53 and c-erbB-2 proteins in breast cancer. J Pathol. 1996 May;179(1):31–38. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9896(199605)179:1<31::AID-PATH523>3.0.CO;2-O. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Geisler S, Lonning PE, Aas T, et al. Influence of TP53 gene alterations and c-erbB-2 expression on the response to treatment with doxorubicin in locally advanced breast cancer. Cancer Res. 2001 Mar 15;61(6):2505–2512. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Langerod A, Zhao H, Borgan O, et al. TP53 mutation status and gene expression profiles are powerful prognostic markers of breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res. 2007;9(3):R30. doi: 10.1186/bcr1675. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Fernandez-Cuesta L, Anaganti S, Hainaut P, Olivier M. p53 status influences response to tamoxifen but not to fulvestrant in breast cancer cell lines. Int J Cancer. Jun 14; doi: 10.1002/ijc.25512. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Chang F, Syrjanen S, Kurvinen K, Syrjanen K. The p53 tumor suppressor gene as a common cellular target in human carcinogenesis. Am J Gastroenterol. 1993 Feb;88(2):174–186. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Petitjean A, Mathe E, Kato S, et al. Impact of mutant p53 functional properties on TP53 mutation patterns and tumor phenotype: lessons from recent developments in the IARC TP53 database. Hum Mutat. 2007 Jun;28(6):622–629. doi: 10.1002/humu.20495. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Goldstein I, Marcel V, Olivier M, Oren M, Rotter V, Hainaut P. Understanding wild-type and mutant p53 activities in human cancer: new landmarks on the way to targeted therapies. Cancer Gene Ther. Jan;18(1):2–11. doi: 10.1038/cgt.2010.63. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Margolies L, Ha R. Breast magnetic resonance imaging: an overview for nonradiologists. Mt Sinai J Med. 2009 Dec;76(6):598–605. doi: 10.1002/msj.20142. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Heymann S, Delaloge S, Rahal A, et al. Radio-induced malignancies after breast cancer postoperative radiotherapy in patients with Li-Fraumeni syndrome. Radiat Oncol. 5:104. doi: 10.1186/1748-717X-5-104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Shahabi V, Seavey MM, Maciag PC, Rivera S, Wallecha A. Development of a live and highly attenuated Listeria monocytogenes-based vaccine for the treatment of Her2/neu-overexpressing cancers in human. Cancer Gene Ther. Jan;18(1):53–62. doi: 10.1038/cgt.2010.48. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Masciari S, Van den Abbeele AD, Diller LR, et al. F18-fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography/computed tomography screening in Li-Fraumeni syndrome. JAMA. 2008 Mar 19;299(11):1315–1319. doi: 10.1001/jama.299.11.1315. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]