Abstract
Purpose
To identify the correlation between different cycles, patient factors and blastocyst characteristics.
Methods
The study included 420 patients undergoing ICSI cycles and 2781 graded blastocysts, which took into account the blastocyst quality. The correlations between the blastocyst parameters and the patient and cycle characteristics were assessed.
Results
The blastocyst development was negatively correlated with the maternal age, BMI and dose of FSH. The ICM was negatively correlated with the FSH dose, whereas the TE quality was influenced by the FSH dose, the maternal age and the number of retrieved oocytes. The embryo morphology on days two and three may predict the blastocyst developmental competence.
Conclusions
Older patients and patients with high BMI should not be included in extended embryo culture programmes. The extended culture may not favour embryos with poor morphology on days two and three of development. Additionally, a lower ovarian stimulation and decreased oocyte yields may lead to the development of high-quality blastocysts.
Keywords: Blastocyst, Embryo, Morphology, Maternal age, FSH
Introduction
An extended embryo culture and the transfer of blastocyst-stage embryos are associated with increased implantation rates compared with the transfer of cleavage-stage embryos [5, 36]. A prolonged culture period allows for a better selection of more advanced embryos that are not arrested because the laboratory assessment is undertaken after the embryonic genome has begun to be expressed, which starts between the four- and eight-cell stages of human embryo development [44]. At this stage, the sperm-derived genes that influence the embryo viability have also been activated, which allow for the selection of a genetically normal embryo. In addition, it has been reported that a better synchronisation between the endometrium function and the embryo development is possible with blastocyst-stage embryo transfers [24, 48].
Moreover, because of their high implantation success rates, single blastocyst transfers may increase pregnancy rates and reduce multiple gestations [13, 38]. In fact, it is necessary to decrease the assisted-reproduction-induced iatrogenic multiple pregnancies due to health, economic and legal issues in several countries [1].
Even though the improved culture media systems have increased the proportion of embryos that reach the blastocyst stage in vitro [41, 49]. the proportion of embryos that reach this stage is still unpredictable [29, 40, 47], and some assisted reproduction centres are reluctant to adopt extended embryo cultures to avoid any embryo transfer cancellation due to an unpredictable rate of blastocyst development.
Various factors, such as the culture medium characteristics [2, 4, 41], the laboratory conditions [23, 27, 46], the oocyte quality [6, 18], and the sperm origin [32], may be responsible for this variation in the rate of blastocyst formation. However, the influence of the patient and cycle characteristics on blastocyst formation is not understood. Moreover, although early embryo morphology scoring systems have been developed [7, 33], it has been suggested that their use is limited by significant intraobserver and interobserver variability [3]. Furthermore, there is no consensus regarding the value of the currently accepted morphological criteria that is used with early embryos to predict subsequent in vitro blastocyst development.
A morphological grading system, which was first described by Gardner and Schoolcraft [12], has been widely used for the selection of the blastocysts for embryo transfer. According to this system, three parameters are graded: the degree of blastocoel expansion and hatching status, the size and compactness of the inner cell mass (ICM), and the cohesiveness and number of trophectoderm (TE) cells. The identification of the different factors that contribute to the blastocyst quality is of paramount importance for the selection of patients who could benefit from extended embryo culture programmes. Therefore, the goal of the present study was to identify the correlation between the different cycles and patient factors and the blastocyst characteristics.
Materials and methods
Study design
This study included 2,781 embryos, which were obtained from 420 patients undergoing intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) cycles between January and December 2011. All of the embryos were evaluated 16–18 h post-ICSI and on days two, three and five of development. All the cases with severe spermatogenic alteration, including frozen and surgically retrieved sperm, were excluded from the study.
The blastocysts were graded according to a modified version of the Gardner and Schoolcraft system [12]. The morphological characteristics of the blastocysts, namely, the degree of blastocoel expansion and hatching status, the size and compactness of the ICM, and the cohesiveness and number of TE cells, were correlated to the following parameters: maternal age, paternal age, FSH dose (for controlled ovarian stimulation), 17β-estradiol levels on the hCG trigger day, number of aspirated follicles, number of retrieved oocytes, maternal body mass index (BMI), sperm concentration, sperm motility and sperm morphology.
The influences of the cause of infertility and the embryo quality on days two and three of development on the blastocyst morphological parameters were also evaluated.
A written informed consent, in which patients agreed to share the outcomes of their cycles for research purposes, was obtained; the study was approved by the local institutional review board.
Controlled ovarian stimulation & laboratory procedures
A controlled ovarian stimulation was achieved by pituitary blockage using a GnRH antagonist (Cetrotide; Serono, Geneva, Switzerland), and the ovarian stimulation was performed using recombinant FSH (Gonal-F; Serono, Geneva, Switzerland).
The follicular growth was monitored using transvaginal ultrasound examination starting on day four of gonadotropin administration. When adequate follicular growth and serum E2 levels were observed, recombinant hCG (Ovidrel; Serono, Geneva, Switzerland) was administered to trigger the final follicular maturation. The oocytes were collected 35 h after hCG administration through transvaginal ultrasound ovum pick-up.
The recovered oocytes were assessed to determine their nuclear status, and those in metaphase II were submitted to ICSI following routine procedures [35].
Embryo morphology evaluation
The embryo morphology was assessed 16–18 h post-ICSI and on the mornings of days two, three and five of embryo development using an inverted Nikon Diaphot microscope (Eclipse TE 300; Nikon, Tokyo, Japan) with a Hoffmann modulation contrast system under 400X magnification.
To evaluate the cleavage-stage morphology, the following parameters were recorded: the number of blastomeres, the percentage of fragmentation, the variation in blastomere symmetry, the presence of multinucleation and the defects in the zona pellucida and cytoplasm. The high-quality cleavage-stage embryos were defined as those with all of the following characteristics: 4 cells on day two or 8–10 cells on day three, <15 % fragmentation, symmetric blastomeres, the absence of multinucleation, colourless cytoplasm with moderate granulation and no inclusions, the absence of perivitelline space granularity and the absence of zona pellucida dysmorphism. Embryos lacking any of these characteristics were considered to be of low quality.
To evaluate the blastocyst-stage morphology, the size and compactness of the ICM and the cohesiveness and number of TE cells were recorded. The embryos were given a numerical score from one to six based on their degree of expansion and hatching status as follows: 1, an early blastocyst with a blastocoel that is less than half of the volume of the embryo; 2, a blastocyst with a blastocoel that is greater than half of the volume of the embryo; 3, a full blastocyst with a blastocoel that completely fills the embryo; 4, an expanded blastocyst; 5, a hatching blastocyst; and 6, a hatched blastocyst. The ICM of full, expanded, hatching, and hatched blastocysts was classified as either high quality (tightly packed with many cells) or low quality (loosely grouped with several or few cells). Similarly, the TE was also classified as either high quality (many cells forming a cohesive epithelium) or low quality (few cells forming a loose epithelium or very few cells).
Statistical analyses
Pearson correlation analyses were performed to study the relationship between the blastocyst morphological parameters and the cycle and patient characteristics. These results were expressed in terms of the correlation coefficient (CC) and p-value. If a significant correlation was found, the data were also compared using Student’s t-test or variance analysis, and the results were expressed as the average ± standard deviation with the corresponding p-values.
In addition, binary regression analyses were used to evaluate the influence of the causes of infertility and embryo quality on the blastocyst morphological parameters on days two and three of development. The results were expressed as odds ratios (ORs), 95 % confidence intervals (CI), and p-values.
The results were considered to be significant at the 5 % critical level (p < 0.05). The data analysis was performed using the Minitab (version 14) Statistical Program.
Results
A significant negative correlation was found between the maternal age (CC: -0.095, p < 0.001), BMI (CC: -0.038, p < 0.001) and total FSH dose (CC: -0.038, p = 0.046) and the degree of blastocyst expansion and hatching status (Table 1). These results were confirmed by variance analysis, which demonstrated a significant difference in the degree of blastocyst expansion and hatching status among the groups in relation to the maternal age (1: 34.2 ± 5.03; 2: 33.7 ± 5.45; 3: 33.5 ± 4.62; 4: 32.3 ± 4.59; 5: 31.3 ± 6.18, p < 0.001), the maternal body mass index (1: 23.1 ± 6.3; 2: 22.7 ± 7.0; 3: 22.3 ± 7.5; 4: 21.8 ± 7.6; 5: 21.2 ± 8.8, p = 0.030) and the FSH dose (1: 2194.4 ± 675.1; 2: 2165.0 ± 706.8;3: 2082.3 ± 712.9; 4: 2071.5 ± 673.5; 5: 2033.7 ± 615.4, p = 0.017).
Table 1.
Response variable | Predictor variable | Correlation coefficient | p |
---|---|---|---|
Degree of expansion and hatching status | Maternal age | −0.095 | <0.001 |
Paternal age | 0.005 | 0.851 | |
FSH dose | −0.068 | <0.001 | |
17β-estradiol level | 0.028 | 0.248 | |
Aspirated follicles | 0.017 | 0.400 | |
Retrieved oocytes | 0.003 | 0.894 | |
Maternal BMI | −0.038 | 0.046 | |
Sperm concentration | −0.006 | 0.836 | |
Sperm motility | −0.032 | 0.260 | |
Sperm morphology | −0.014 | 0.632 | |
ICM quality | Maternal age | −0.005 | 0.755 |
Paternal age | −0.010 | 0.731 | |
FSH dose | −0.031 | 0.044 | |
17β-estradiol level | −0.004 | 0.832 | |
Aspirated follicles | −0.020 | 0.215 | |
Retrieved oocytes | −0.015 | 0.356 | |
Maternal BMI | 0.011 | 0.520 | |
Sperm concentration | −0.004 | 0.887 | |
Sperm motility | −0.007 | 0.808 | |
Sperm morphology | −0.009 | 0.753 | |
TE quality | Maternal age | −0.067 | <0.001 |
Paternal age | 0.035 | 0.226 | |
FSH dose | −0.073 | <0.001 | |
17β-estradiol level | 0.036 | 0.465 | |
Aspirated follicles | −0.006 | 0.736 | |
Retrieved oocytes | −0.030 | 0.050 | |
Maternal BMI | −0.014 | 0.401 | |
Sperm concentration | −0.007 | 0.816 | |
Sperm motility | 0.026 | 0.373 | |
Sperm morphology | 0.022 | 0.450 |
ICM Inner cell mass, TE trophectoderm cells, BMI body mass index
The FSH dose was also negatively correlated with both the ICM (CC: -0.031, p = 0.044) and the TE quality (CC: -0.073, p < 0.001) (Table 1). These findings were also confirmed by Student’s t-test, which demonstrated a significant difference in the ICM (high quality: 2115.0 ± 661.1; low quality: 2200.5 ± 691.2, p < 0.001) and TE (high quality: 1938.0 ± 721.1; low quality: 2164.5 ± 721.2, p < 0.001) groups in relation to the FSH dose.
The maternal age (CC: -0.067, p < 0.001) and the number of retrieved oocytes (CC: -0.030, p = 0.050) were negatively correlated with the TE quality (Table 1). These results were also confirmed by Student’s t-test, which showed a significant difference between the TE groups in relation to the maternal age (high quality: 32.74 ± 4.38; low quality: 33.8 ± 5.63, p = 0.007) and the number of retrieved oocytes (high quality: 11.5 ± 8.50; low quality: 14.3 ± 7.63, p < 0.001).
In the analysis of the causes of infertility, the logistic regression showed that all the blastocyst morphological parameters were negatively influenced by the presence of ovarian factor infertility. The presence of polycystic ovarian syndrome negatively influenced the degree of blastocyst expansion and hatching status. Moreover, the presence of endometriosis negatively influenced both the ICM and TE morphologies (Table 2).
Table 2.
Response variable | Predictor variable | p | OR | CI: Lower | CI: Upper |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Male factor | Degree of expansion and hatching status | 0.961 | 1.00 | 0.95 | 1.05 |
ICM quality | 0.885 | 0.94 | 0.41 | 2.15 | |
TE quality | 0.935 | 0.98 | 0.65 | 1.49 | |
Ovarian factor | Degree of expansion and hatching status | 0.025 | 1.92 | 1.86 | 0199 |
ICM quality | 0.003 | 1.44 | 1.26 | 0.76 | |
TE quality | 0.003 | 2.31 | 1.34 | 3.99 | |
PCOS | Degree of expansion and hatching status | 0.029 | 1.10 | 1.01 | 1.20 |
ICM quality | 0.809 | 1.09 | 0.54 | 2.20 | |
TE quality | 0.589 | 1.53 | 0.33 | 7.19 | |
Endometriosis | Degree of expansion and hatching status | 0.775 | 1.01 | 0.94 | 1.08 |
ICM quality | 0.029 | 1.53 | 1.30 | 1.94 | |
TE quality | 0.016 | 2.04 | 1.14 | 3.63 |
PCOS Polycystic ovarian syndrome, ICM Inner cell mass, TE trophectoderm cells, OR odds ratio, CI confidence interval
However, the presence of male factor infertility did not have any impact on blastocyst quality (Table 2). Furthermore, it was noted that a positive correlation existed between the day two and day three embryo quality and the degree of blastocyst expansion, the hatching status and the ICM quality; however, no correlation was found with the TE quality (Table 3).
Table 3.
Response variable | Predictor variable | p | OR | CI: Lower | CI: Upper |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Embryo quality on day two | Degree of expansion and hatching status | <0.001 | 1.86 | 1.82 | 1.90 |
ICM quality | 0.017 | 1.68 | 1.50 | 1.92 | |
TE quality | 0.118 | 1.27 | 1.12 | 1.49 | |
Embryo quality on day three | Degree of expansion and hatching status | <0.001 | 1.78 | 1.74 | 1.83 |
ICM quality | 0.010 | 1.58 | 1.39 | 1.86 | |
TE quality | 0.041 | 3.31 | 1.32 | 5.99 |
ICM Inner cell mass, TE trophectoderm cells, OR odds ratio, CI confidence interval
Discussion
The transfer of human embryos at the blastocyst stage is becoming more common in the practice of assisted reproduction [28]. The advantages of blastocyst-stage embryo transfer include better synchronisation between the endometrium and the embryo and the possible selection of embryos with a higher implantation potential [34]. The disadvantages of the extended embryo culture are the unpredictable rate of blastocyst development and the risk of embryo transfer cancellation.
In the present study, we evaluated the possible factors that may influence blastocyst formation and morphology. The maternal age and total FSH dose appeared to play a role in the blastocyst developmental capacity. The FSH dose correlated with the quality of both the ICM and TE, and the maternal age correlated with the TE status.
Similar to our findings, several other studies have also shown a decrease in the blastocyst development rate with increasing female age [14, 20, 42]. Other than advanced maternal age, no clearly established factor has been described for the development of embryos with poor morphology. It is typical that more than half of the retrieved oocytes from women older than 40 years of age that underwent IVF treatment have abnormal chromosomes [11]. This result is in agreement with our findings, which demonstrated that the maternal age influences the blastocyst developmental competence. However, the blastocyst morphology was unaffected by the paternal age or other sperm parameters.
Previous reports have suggested a negative paternal influence on the blastocyst developmental capacity [8, 43]. It has been demonstrated that oocytes injected with spermatozoa with high motility have a significantly higher chance of reaching the blastocyst stage [30, 43]. It has also been reported that paternal cigarette smoke exposure affects the embryonic implantation ability [21]. However, the results of the above-mentioned studies should be interpreted with caution because some of these results were based on the continued culture of embryos that were considered unsuitable for transfer or cryopreservation on day three of development. In addition, these studies predate recent improvements in the culture media and may represent development under sub-optimal culture conditions.
Our findings also suggest a significant correlation between the FSH dose and the blastocyst quality. The relationship between the elevated FSH dose used for ovarian stimulation and the embryo quality remains a topic of heated discussion among practitioners of assisted reproduction. There is growing evidence in animal studies to support the hypothesis that elevated FSH is an underlying cause of embryo defects [9, 10, 39]. However, whereas animal studies seem to support an association between FSH exposure and embryonic defects, human studies have been more inconsistent [25, 26, 31, 37, 45].
In our study, the FSH dose and the number of retrieved oocytes had a negative impact on the TE quality. Our results are in agreement with recent studies that have shown that milder ovarian stimulation reduces the likelihood of segregation errors during early embryo cleavages [16, 22] and results in high-quality embryos for transfer, as indicated by good embryo morphology [17]. The observation that higher FSH doses and oocyte yields are associated with impaired blastocyst development may be due to an supraphysiologic ovarian stimulation that interferes with the cell machinery during oocyte formation. These findings suggest that lower oocyte yields may represent a better response to ovarian stimulation because it allows the development of only the most competent follicles and oocytes.
The influence of the cause of infertility on the blastocyst developmental competence was also evaluated in this study. It was noted that the presence of ovarian factor infertility had a negative impact on all aspects of the blastocyst quality. Moreover, the presence of PCOS and endometrioses had a negative effect on the degree of blastocyst development and the ICM and TE quality, respectively. A recent study concluded that the blastocyst development rate is not related to the cause of infertility; however, the study may have been underpowered to detect differences [19].
The decline in the blastocyst developmental competence in the presence of female factor infertility is in agreement with our findings regarding the relationship between the maternal age and the blastocyst quality. It is generally accepted that the activation of the full embryonic genome is complete after the 8-cell stage [44]. At this stage, the paternally activated genes are expressed and may influence the embryo viability. However, it has been reported that the oocyte quality has a more drastic effect on the blastocyst developmental capacity than the sperm quality; therefore, the oocyte is mainly responsible for the blastocyst developmental capacity.
It was clearly demonstrated that the embryo morphology on both days two and three may predict the blastocyst developmental competence; therefore, the quality of the cleavage-state embryo may be predictive of the quality of the blastocyst formation. In fact, our data showed that a good morphology on day three increases the likelihood that a blastocyst will be of good quality by up to threefold. Conversely, previous studies have suggested that the early embryo morphology is a poor predictor of the blastocyst quality in extended culture [14, 15]. A recent study from Guerif et al. [15] suggested that the relationship between early morphological parameters and the blastocyst morphology is weak. However, it was demonstrated that the degree of fragmentation on day three should be taken into account in the selection of the best blastocyst for transfer.
Several studies have shown improved outcomes with blastocyst transfer; however, not all patients may benefit from postponing the embryo transfer until day five of development. The results presented here suggest that older patients, patients with high BMI, and those couples with female factor infertility should not be included in the extended embryo culture programmes. An extended culture may also not favour embryos with poor morphology on days two and three of development. In addition, our evidence suggests that lower ovarian stimulation and decreased oocyte yields may represent a more appropriate response to ovarian stimulation and thus may lead to the development of high-quality blastocysts.
Footnotes
Capsule
Older patients and patients with high BMI should not be included in extended embryo culture programmes. Moreover, lower ovarian stimulation and decreased oocyte yields lead to the development to high quality blastocysts.
References
- 1.Adashi EY, Barri PN, Berkowitz R, Braude P, Bryan E, Carr J, Cohen J, Collins J, Devroey P, Frydman R, Gardner D, Germond M, Gerris J, Gianaroli L, Hamberger L, Howles C, Jones H, Jr, Lunenfeld B, Pope A, Reynolds M, Rosenwaks Z, Shieve LA, Serour GI, Shenfield F, Templeton A, Steirteghem A, Veeck L, Wennerholm UB. Infertility therapy-associated multiple pregnancies (births): an ongoing epidemic. Reprod Biomed Online. 2003;7:515–542. doi: 10.1016/S1472-6483(10)62069-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Baart EB, Macklon NS, Fauser BJ. Ovarian stimulation and embryo quality. Reprod Biomed Online. 2009;18(Suppl 2):45–50. doi: 10.1016/S1472-6483(10)60448-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Baxter Bendus AE, Mayer JF, Shipley SK, Catherino WH. Interobserver and intraobserver variation in day 3 embryo grading. Fertil Steril. 2006;86:1608–1615. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2006.05.037. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Biggers JD, Racowsky C. The development of fertilized human ova to the blastocyst stage in KSOM(AA) medium: is a two-step protocol necessary? Reprod Biomed Online. 2002;5:133–140. doi: 10.1016/S1472-6483(10)61615-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Blake DA, Farquhar CM, Johnson N, Proctor M. Cleavage stage versus blastocyst stage embryo transfer in assisted conception. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007;CD002118. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 6.Catala MG, Izquierdo D, Rodriguez-Prado M, Hammami S, Paramio MT. Effect of oocyte quality on blastocyst development after in vitro fertilization (IVF) and intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) in a sheep model. Fertil Steril. 2012;97:1004–1008. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2011.12.043. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Desai NN, Goldstein J, Rowland DY, Goldfarb JM. Morphological evaluation of human embryos and derivation of an embryo quality scoring system specific for day 3 embryos: a preliminary study. Hum Reprod. 2000;15:2190–2196. doi: 10.1093/humrep/15.10.2190. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Dumoulin JC, Coonen E, Bras M, Wissen LC, Ignoul-Vanvuchelen R, Bergers-Jansen JM, Derhaag JG, Geraedts JP, Evers JL. Comparison of in-vitro development of embryos originating from either conventional in-vitro fertilization or intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Hum Reprod. 2000;15:402–409. doi: 10.1093/humrep/15.2.402. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Edgar DH, Whalley KM, Mills JA. Effects of high-dose and multiple-dose gonadotropin stimulation on mouse oocyte quality as assessed by preimplantation development following in vitro fertilization. J In Vitro Fert Embryo Transf. 1987;4:273–276. doi: 10.1007/BF01555203. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Elbling L, Colot M. Abnormal development and transport and increased sister-chromatid exchange in preimplantation embryos following superovulation in mice. Mutat Res. 1985;147:189–195. doi: 10.1016/0165-1161(85)90057-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Fragouli E, Katz-Jaffe M, Alfarawati S, Stevens J, Colls P, Goodall NN, Tormasi S, Gutierrez-Mateo C, Prates R, Schoolcraft WB, Munne S, Wells D. Comprehensive chromosome screening of polar bodies and blastocysts from couples experiencing repeated implantation failure. Fertil Steril. 2011;94:875–887. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.04.053. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Gardner DK, Schoolcraft WB. In-vitro culture of human blastocysts. In: Jansen R, Mortimer D, editors. Towards reproductive certainty: fertility and genetics beyond. Carnforth: Parthenon Press; 1999. pp. 378–88. [Google Scholar]
- 13.Gardner DK, Surrey E, Minjarez D, Leitz A, Stevens J, Schoolcraft WB. Single blastocyst transfer: a prospective randomized trial. Fertil Steril. 2004;81:551–555. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2003.07.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Graham J, Han T, Porter R, Levy M, Stillman R, Tucker MJ. Day 3 morphology is a poor predictor of blastocyst quality in extended culture. Fertil Steril. 2000;74:495–497. doi: 10.1016/S0015-0282(00)00689-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Guerif F, Lemseffer M, Leger J, Bidault R, Cadoret V, Chavez C, Gasnier O, Saussereau MH, Royere D. Does early morphology provide additional selection power to blastocyst selection for transfer? Reprod Biomed Online. 2010;21:510–519. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2010.06.043. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Haaf T, Hahn A, Lambrecht A, Grossmann B, Schwaab E, Khanaga O, Hahn T, Tresch A, Schorsch M. A high oocyte yield for intracytoplasmic sperm injection treatment is associated with an increased chromosome error rate. Fertil Steril. 2009;91:733–738. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.01.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Hohmann FP, Macklon NS, Fauser BC. A randomized comparison of two ovarian stimulation protocols with gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist cotreatment for in vitro fertilization commencing recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone on cycle day 2 or 5 with the standard long GnRH agonist protocol. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2003;88:166–173. doi: 10.1210/jc.2002-020788. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Host E, Lindenberg S, Smidt-Jensen S. The role of DNA strand breaks in human spermatozoa used for IVF and ICSI. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2000;79:559–563. doi: 10.1080/j.1600-0412.2000.079007559.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Hsieh YY, Tsai HD, Chang FC. Routine blastocyst culture and transfer: 201 patients' experience. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2000;17:405–408. doi: 10.1023/A:1009458215962. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Janny L, Menezo YJ. Maternal age effect on early human embryonic development and blastocyst formation. Mol Reprod Dev. 1996;45:31–37. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2795(199609)45:1<31::AID-MRD4>3.0.CO;2-T. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Kapawa A, Giannakis D, Tsoukanelis K, Kanakas N, Baltogiannis D, Agapitos E, Loutradis D, Miyagawa I, Sofikitis N. Effects of paternal cigarette smoking on testicular function, sperm fertilizing capacity, embryonic development, and blastocyst capacity for implantation in rats. Andrologia. 2004;36:57–68. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0272.2004.00605.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Katz-Jaffe MG, Trounson AO, Cram DS. Chromosome 21 mosaic human preimplantation embryos predominantly arise from diploid conceptions. Fertil Steril. 2005;84:634–643. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2005.03.045. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Lane M, Mitchell M, Cashman KS, Feil D, Wakefield S, Zander-Fox DL. To QC or not to QC: the key to a consistent laboratory? Reprod Fertil Dev. 2008;20:23–32. doi: 10.1071/RD07161. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Langley MT, Marek DM, Gardner DK, Doody KM, Doody KJ. Extended embryo culture in human assisted reproduction treatments. Hum Reprod. 2001;16:902–908. doi: 10.1093/humrep/16.5.902. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Massie JA, Burney RO, Milki AA, Westphal LM, Lathi RB. Basal follicle-stimulating hormone as a predictor of fetal aneuploidy. Fertil Steril. 2008;90:2351–2355. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.10.041. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Massie JA, Shahine LK, Milki AA, Westphal LM, Lathi RB. Ovarian stimulation and the risk of aneuploid conceptions. Fertil Steril. 2011;95:970–972. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2010.07.1088. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Meintjes M, Chantilis SJ, Douglas JD, Rodriguez AJ, Guerami AR, Bookout DM, Barnett BD, Madden JD. A controlled randomized trial evaluating the effect of lowered incubator oxygen tension on live births in a predominantly blastocyst transfer program. Hum Reprod. 2009;24:300–307. doi: 10.1093/humrep/den368. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Meldrum DR. Blastocyst transfer–a natural evolution. Fertil Steril. 1999;72:216–217. doi: 10.1016/S0015-0282(99)00254-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Mercader A, Garcia-Velasco JA, Escudero E, Remohi J, Pellicer A, Simon C. Clinical experience and perinatal outcome of blastocyst transfer after coculture of human embryos with human endometrial epithelial cells: a 5-year follow-up study. Fertil Steril. 2003;80:1162–1168. doi: 10.1016/S0015-0282(03)01178-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Miller JE, Smith TT. The effect of intracytoplasmic sperm injection and semen parameters on blastocyst development in vitro. Hum Reprod. 2001;16:918–924. doi: 10.1093/humrep/16.5.918. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Munne S, Magli C, Adler A, Wright G, Boer K, Mortimer D, Tucker M, Cohen J, Gianaroli L. Treatment-related chromosome abnormalities in human embryos. Hum Reprod. 1997;12:780–784. doi: 10.1093/humrep/12.4.780. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Nilsson S, Waldenstrom U, Engstrom AB, Hellberg D. Single blastocyst transfer after ICSI from ejaculate spermatozoa, percutaneous epididymal sperm aspiration (PESA) or testicular sperm extraction (TESE) J Assist Reprod Genet. 2007;24:167–171. doi: 10.1007/s10815-006-9091-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Nomura M, Iwase A, Furui K, Kitagawa T, Matsui Y, Yoshikawa M, Kikkawa F. Preferable correlation to blastocyst development and pregnancy rates with a new embryo grading system specific for day 3 embryos. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2007;24:23–28. doi: 10.1007/s10815-006-9086-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Olivennes F, Hazout A, Lelaidier C, Freitas S, Fanchin R, Ziegler D, Frydman R. Four indications for embryo transfer at the blastocyst stage. Hum Reprod. 1994;9:2367–2373. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a138454. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Palermo GD, Colombero LT, Rosenwaks Z. The human sperm centrosome is responsible for normal syngamy and early embryonic development. Rev Reprod. 1997;2:19–27. doi: 10.1530/ror.0.0020019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Papanikolaou EG, Kolibianakis EM, Tournaye H, Venetis CA, Fatemi H, Tarlatzis B, Devroey P. Live birth rates after transfer of equal number of blastocysts or cleavage-stage embryos in IVF. A systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod. 2008;23:91–99. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dem339. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Roberts R, Iatropoulou A, Ciantar D, Stark J, Becker DL, Franks S, Hardy K. Follicle-stimulating hormone affects metaphase I chromosome alignment and increases aneuploidy in mouse oocytes matured in vitro. Biol Reprod. 2005;72:107–118. doi: 10.1095/biolreprod.104.032003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Ryan GL, Sparks AE, Sipe CS, Syrop CH, Dokras A, Voorhis BJ. A mandatory single blastocyst transfer policy with educational campaign in a United States IVF program reduces multiple gestation rates without sacrificing pregnancy rates. Fertil Steril. 2007;88:354–360. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.03.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Sato F, Marrs RP. The effect of pregnant mare serum gonadotropin on mouse embryos fertilized in vivo or in vitro. J In Vitro Fert Embryo Transf. 1986;3:353–357. doi: 10.1007/BF01133247. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Schoolcraft WB, Gardner DK. Blastocyst versus day 2 or 3 transfer. Semin Reprod Med. 2001;19:259–268. doi: 10.1055/s-2001-18045. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Sepulveda S, Garcia J, Arriaga E, Diaz J, Noriega-Portella L, Noriega-Hoces L. In vitro development and pregnancy outcomes for human embryos cultured in either a single medium or in a sequential media system. Fertil Steril. 2009;91:1765–1770. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.02.169. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Shapiro BS, Richter KS, Harris DC, Daneshmand ST. Influence of patient age on the growth and transfer of blastocyst-stage embryos. Fertil Steril. 2002;77:700–705. doi: 10.1016/S0015-0282(01)03251-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Shoukir Y, Chardonnens D, Campana A, Sakkas D. Blastocyst development from supernumerary embryos after intracytoplasmic sperm injection: a paternal influence? Hum Reprod. 1998;13:1632–1637. doi: 10.1093/humrep/13.6.1632. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Tesarik J, Kopecny V, Plachot M, Mandelbaum J. Early morphological signs of embryonic genome expression in human preimplantation development as revealed by quantitative electron microscopy. Dev Biol. 1988;128:15–20. doi: 10.1016/0012-1606(88)90261-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Verpoest W, Fauser BC, Papanikolaou E, Staessen C, Landuyt L, Donoso P, Tournaye H, Liebaers I, Devroey P. Chromosomal aneuploidy in embryos conceived with unstimulated cycle IVF. Hum Reprod. 2008;23:2369–2371. doi: 10.1093/humrep/den269. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Waldenstrom U, Engstrom AB, Hellberg D, Nilsson S. Low-oxygen compared with high-oxygen atmosphere in blastocyst culture, a prospective randomized study. Fertil Steril. 2009;91:2461–2465. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.03.051. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Westphal LM, Hinckley MD, Behr B, Milki AA. Effect of ICSI on subsequent blastocyst development and pregnancy rates. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2003;20:113–116. doi: 10.1023/A:1022678807398. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Wilson M, Hartke K, Kiehl M, Rodgers J, Brabec C, Lyles R. Integration of blastocyst transfer for all patients. Fertil Steril. 2002;77:693–696. doi: 10.1016/S0015-0282(01)03235-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Wirleitner B, Vanderzwalmen P, Stecher A, Zech MH, Zintz M, Zech NH. Individual demands of human embryos on IVF culture medium: influence on blastocyst development and pregnancy outcome. Reprod Biomed Online. 2010;21:776–782. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2010.08.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]