‘First Do No Harm’ is a series of 12 brief monthly articles with internet footnotes about harming and healing in general practice. Each instalment is based on one of the 12 RCGP competency domains, this month’s being:
8. Working with colleagues and in teams: working effectively with other professionals to ensure patient care, including the sharing of information with colleagues.1
‘When left to its processes, each intervention system will maximise its potential to make iatrogenic errors’.2
INTRODUCTION
The healthcare systems that are most equitable, high-quality, holistic, and cost-effective are those based on primary care. Primary care is the point of entry to the healthcare system for members of a family, community, geographical area, or list and provides care that is long-term, comprehensive, coordinated, and focused on people rather than on diseases.3,4 Optimal management of individual diseases may require shared-care with specialists3 but referring patients with functional problems undermines their self-efficacy, medicalises, disrupts the clinician’s therapeutic relationship with them,5 and risks diffusion or abnegation of responsibility through the ‘collusion of anonymity’.6
HARMING
Allowing structure (of service) to impede process (of care).5 Raising expectations that can’t be met. Undermining other professionals and second-guessing their actions: ‘your doctor should have arranged a scan’. Applying ever-increasing doses of a favourite therapy.2 Working in professional isolation.7
HEALING
Designing and navigating structure (of service) to facilitate process (of care).1 Working with the possible. Cooperating with and supporting other professionals: ‘your doctor has done a good job’. Encouraging cultural change from within rather than depending on checklists imposed from without.8
ATTITUDE
Being committed to the health of both the patient and the practice.
KNOWLEDGE
General practice requires organisational and personal continuity of care. Patients value the reassurance of a continuing relationship with a usual doctor.9 Members of the team retain autonomy while communicating face-to-face across professional boundaries,10 putting the needs of patients before personal gratification and the needs of the organisation.11 Team-work prevents isolation and personal care prevents anonymity.12 Incompetence is often compounded by the individual’s failure to recognise it in themselves:13isolation and lack of insight are risk factors for poor performance.7 GPs faced with clinical questions are unlikely to find, or understand,14 answers in the research literature; they’re more likely to depend on advice from colleagues.15,16
SKILLS
When referring or delegating being prepared to surrender authority: not ‘the nurse will heal that ulcer with silver dressings’ but ‘the nurse will help with that ulcer’; not ‘your doctor will do a blood test’ but ‘your doctor will see you and take things from there’.5 Learning from and teaching peers; seeking and acting on feedback from colleagues, from other practices if necessary.7 Dropping in on members of the team, encouraging and thanking them. Complimenting and complementing colleagues. Aiming for high challenge and high support.17
Supplementary information
The internet footnotes accompanying this article can be found at: http://www.darmipc.net/first-do-no-harm-footnotes.html
REFERENCES
- 1.Royal College of General Practitioners. nMRCGP 12 Competency areas in detail. http://www.rcgp.org.uk/gp-training-and-exams/mrcgp-workplace-based-assessment-wpba/wpba-competence-framework.aspx (accessed 10 Dec 2012)
- 2.Frey DH. Level of Care, Therapy mode and Iatrogenesis in mental health. In: Morgan RF, editor. The Iatrogenics handbook: a critical look at research and practice in the helping professions. Laredo, TX: IPI Publishing Limited; 1983. [Google Scholar]
- 3.Stange KC, Ferrer RL. The paradox of primary care. Ann Fam Med. 2009;7(4):293–99. doi: 10.1370/afm.1023. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Starfield B, Shi L, Macinko J. Contribution of primary care to health systems and health. Milbank Q. 2005;83(3):457–502. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0009.2005.00409.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Treasure W. Diagnosis and risk management in primary care: words that count, numbers that speak. Abington: Radcliffe Publishing. 2011 [Google Scholar]
- 6.Balint M. New York, NY: International Universities Press; 1957. The doctor, his patient and the illness. [Google Scholar]
- 7.Cox SJ, Holden JD. Isolation and insight: practical pillars of revalidation? Br J Gen Pract. 2009;59(564):550–551. doi: 10.3399/bjgp09X453675. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Dixon-Woods M, Bosk CL, Aveling EL, et al. Explaining Michigan: developing an ex post theory of a quality improvement program. Milbank Q. 2011;89(2):167–205. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0009.2011.00625.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Cocksedge S, Greenfield R, Nugent GK, Chew-Graham C. Holding relationships in primary care: a qualitative exploration of doctors' and patients' perceptions. Br J Gen Pract. 2011 doi: 10.3399/bjgp11X588457. DOI: 10.3399/bjgp11X588457. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Gerada C, Mathers N, Thomas M. London: RCGP; 2012. General Practice 2022. http://www.rcgp.org.uk/policy/rcgp-policy-areas/general-practice-2022.aspx (accessed 10 Dec 2012) [Google Scholar]
- 11.Lakhani M, Baker M, Field S. London: RCGP; 2007. The Future Direction of General Practice: a roadmap. http://www.rcgp.org.uk/policy/rcgp-policy-areas/~/media/Files/Policy/A-Z%20policy/the_future_direction_rcgp_roadmap.ashx (accessed 10 Dec 2012) [Google Scholar]
- 12.Orton P, Orton C, Pereira Gray D. Depersonalised doctors: a cross-sectional study of 564 doctors, 760 consultations and 1876 patient reports in UK general practice. BMJ Open. 2012;2:e000274. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2011-000274. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Kruger J, Dunning D. Unskilled and unaware of it: how difficulties in recognizing one's own incompetence lead to inflated self-assessments. J Pers Soc Psycho. 1999;77(6):1121–314. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.77.6.1121. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Glasziou P. Why bother with evidence-based practice? http://www.cebm.net/mod_product/design/presentations/introduction-to-ebm-2010-03.ppt (accessed 10 Dec 2012)
- 15.Coumou HCH, Meijman FJ. How do primary care physicians seek answers to clinical questions? A literature review. J Med Libr Assoc. 2006;94(1):55–60. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Gabbay J. Evidence based guidelines or collectively constructed ‘mindlines?’ Ethnographic study of knowledge management in primary care. BMJ. 2004;329(7473):1013–1010. doi: 10.1136/bmj.329.7473.1013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Brown D. London: HCV Publishing; 2009. The meaning of careful. [Google Scholar]