Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Aug 1.
Published in final edited form as: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2012 Aug 1;83(5):e655–e660. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2012.01.061

NECROSIS AFTER CRANIOSPINAL IRRADIATION: RESULTS FROM A PROSPECTIVE SERIES OF CHILDREN WITH CNS EMBRYONAL TUMORS

Erin S Murphy 1, Thomas E Merchant 2, Shengjie Wu 2, Xiaoping Xiong 2, Renin Lukose 2, Karen D Wright 2, Ibrahim Qaddoumi 2, Gregory T Armstrong 2, Alberto Broniscer 2, Amar Gajjar 2
PMCID: PMC3529413  NIHMSID: NIHMS423721  PMID: 22768993

Abstract

PURPOSE

Necrosis of the CNS is a known complication of craniospinal irradiation (CSI) in children with medulloblastoma and similar tumors. We reviewed the incidence of necrosis in our prospective treatment series.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Between 1996 and 2009, 236 children with medulloblastoma (n = 185) or other CNS embryonal tumors (n=51) received post-operative CSI followed by dose-intense cyclophosphamide, vincristine, and cisplatin. Average-risk cases (n = 148) received 23.4 Gy CSI, 36 Gy posterior fossa, and 55.8 Gy primary; after 2003, the treatment was 23.4 Gy CSI and 55.8 Gy primary. All high-risk cases (n = 88) received 36–39.6 Gy CSI and 55.8 Gy primary. The primary site clinical target volume margin was 2-cm (pre-2003) or 1-cm (post-2003). With competing risk of death by any cause, we determined the cumulative incidence of necrosis.

RESULTS

With a median follow-up of 52 months (range, 4–163 months), eight cases of necrosis were documented. One death was attributed. The median time to the imaging evidence was 4.8 months and symptoms 6.0 months. The cumulative incidence at 5 years was 3.7% ± 1.3% (n = 236) for the entire cohort, and 4.4% ± 1.5% (n = 196) for infratentorial tumor location. The mean relative volume of infratentorial brain receiving high-dose irradiation was significantly greater for patients with necrosis compared to those without: ≥ 50 Gy (92.12% ± 4.58 vs. 72.89% ± 1.96, p = 0.0337), ≥ 52 Gy (88.95% ± 5.50 vs. 69.16% ± 1.97, p = 0.0275), and ≥ 54 Gy (82.28% ± 7.06 vs. 63.37% ± 1.96, p = 0.0488).

CONCLUSIONS

Necrosis in patients with CNS embryonal tumors is uncommon. When competing risks are considered, the incidence is 3.7% at 5 years. The volume of infratentorial brain receiving greater than 50, 52, and 54 Gy is predictive for necrosis.

Keywords: necrosis, medulloblastoma, craniospinal irradiation, pediatrics

Introduction

Treatment regimens for patients with CNS embryonal tumors, including medulloblastoma, are designed to achieve a high rate of disease control using craniospinal irradiation (CSI) in combination with surgery and chemotherapy. Multimodality therapy for medulloblastoma results in 5-year event free survival (EFS) rates of 79–83% for average-risk disease (1, 2) and 54–70% for high-risk disease (1, 3). Patients with other CNS embryonal tumors generally fare less well, (4, 5) although recent reports indicate that selected patients with supratentorial primitive neuroectodermal tumors (S-PNET) and atypical teratoid rhabdoid tumors (AT/RT) have 75% 5 year and 78% 3 year EFS rates, respectively. Cognitive deficits (6), endocrinopathy (7), and hearing loss (8) are common among these patients and remain primary concerns after CSI. There is limited information about the less common but potentially devastating complications including brain and spinal cord necrosis, cerebral vasculopathy, and secondary malignancies. Necrosis is a rare complication of irradiation in patients with brain and spinal cord tumors. In one review, the incidence using daily fractions of 2 Gy was predicted to be 5% when delivering a total of 72 Gy (range 60–84 Gy) and 10% for 90 Gy (range 84–102 Gy) (9). Another review suggested that the risk of injury and necrosis of the brainstem should be low when the entire brainstem is irradiated to 54 Gy or when a small portion (1–10 mL) receives up to 59 Gy using conventional fractionation (10). Because these data are derived from adult patients with head and neck tumors, low- and high-grade glioma, and brain metastases (9, 10), the incidence of necrosis for pediatric patients treated with CSI and chemotherapy remains unknown.

We reviewed the medical records, neuroimaging and toxicity reports of patients with medulloblastoma and similarly treated CNS embryonal tumors to determine the incidence of radiation-induced necrosis. Our goal was to estimate the critical combination of radiation dose and irradiated volume that might lead to necrosis in this group of patients treated prospectively with aggressive surgery and high-dose chemotherapy.

Patients and Methods

Patients

Between 1996 and 2009, 236 children (88 girls, 148 boys) with newly diagnosed CNS embryonal tumors were prospectively treated according to one of two protocols, SJMB96 (1) or SJMB03 (clinicaltrials.gov, NCT00085202), at St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital. Treatment included maximum resection followed by risk-adapted, postoperative CSI and chemotherapy. This project was performed with IRB approval.

Patients ages 3 to 21 at the time of diagnosis with average-risk or high-risk disease were eligible. Average-risk patients had no evidence of metastatic disease and residual primary site disease ≤ 1.5 cm2 on postoperative MRI. High-risk patients had primary site residual disease measuring > 1.5 cm2 by MRI or metastatic disease as determined by cytologic evaluation of CSF or MRI evaluation of the brain or spine. CSI was scheduled to begin within 28–31 days after surgical resection.

Treatment

Radiation Therapy

Until 2003, average-risk patients (n = 148) received CSI (23.4 Gy), posterior fossa irradiation (36 Gy), and primary site irradiation (55.8 Gy) using a 2-cm clinical target volume (CTV) margin. After 2003, average-risk patients received CSI (23.4 Gy) and primary site irradiation (55.8 Gy) using a 1-cm CTV. High-risk patients (n = 88) received CSI (36–39.6 Gy) followed by primary site irradiation (55.8 Gy) using a 2-cm (pre-2003) or 1-cm (post-2003) CTV margin. Both protocols allowed for 59.4 Gy to selected patients with substantial residual tumor; 17 patients received a prescription dose > 55.8 Gy including 3 patients with pineal region tumors.

The CSI volume included the entire subarachnoid space. When the posterior fossa was irradiated to 36 Gy after 23.4 Gy CSI, the CTV was the anatomic posterior fossa. In all cases, the gross tumor volume (GTV) for the primary site component “boost” of therapy was defined by all gross residual tumor or by the tumor bed contoured anatomically according to the tissues involved on preoperative imaging and then shaped according to postoperative imaging. The CTV margin for the primary site boost was anatomically confined. A 3-dimensional margin of 3 to 5 mm was added to the CTV to create the planning target volume (PTV). Guidelines required that 100% of the PTV receive at least 95% of the prescription dose and that no more than 10% of the PTV could receive more than 110% of the prescription dose. Posterior fossa and primary site irradiation was delivered using 3-D conformal or intensity-modulated radiation therapy methods.

Chemotherapy and Follow-Up

Chemotherapy was initiated 6 weeks after completion of radiation therapy. Patients received four cycles of high-dose cisplatin, vincristine, and cyclophosphamide. Each 4-week cycle was followed by autologous stem-cell rescue. Exactly 119 of 129 patients who received surgery and radiotherapy completed all 4 cycles of chemotherapy. The disease control outcomes for this study have not been reported.

The details of the chemotherapy regimen have been described elsewhere (1). After completion of all therapy, patients were evaluated with brain MRI every 3 months for at least the first 18 months and then every 6 months for 5 years, and annually thereafter. The schedule for spine MRI and lumbar puncture for CSF was determined by risk group.

Data Collection and Necrosis Definition

Medical records, including neuroimaging and toxicity reports were reviewed to determine the cumulative incidence of CNS necrosis. Necrosis was defined by late enhancement of normal tissues as assessed by contrast-enhanced T1-weighted MR imaging, increased signal on T2 and FLAIR imaging, and the imaging parameters of apparent diffusion coefficient, fractional anisotropy, FDG-PET, and MR spectroscopy, when available. Composite treatment plans were available for all patients and included detailed dose-volume data for normal tissue structures, including spinal cord, brainstem, cerebellum, and cerebrum. Mean dose, integrated dose, and maximum dose to specific normal tissue volumes, including spinal cord, brainstem, cerebellum, cerebrum, and infratentorial brain were calculated.

Statistical Analysis

The incidence of necrosis was calculated from the start date of radiation therapy with death considered a competing event. Patients were censored at the date of death or last follow-up. The cumulative incidence of brain necrosis was determined for the entire cohort, infratentorial tumor location, and by cranial dose level. Comparisons were made using the log-rank technique. The Wilcoxon test was used to evaluate the absolute and relative volumes of brain, brainstem, spinal cord, and infratentorial brain receiving radiation doses ≥ 50 Gy and up to 60 Gy in patients with and without necrosis. Logistic regression was used to explore the predictors for the incidence of necrosis. The 5-year overall survival was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method.

Results

Clinical characteristics of patients are presented in Table 1. The surviving patients were followed for a median of 52 months (range, 4–163 months). Eight cases of brain necrosis were documented. The time course, symptoms, and treatment are detailed in Table 2. Necrosis occurred only in patients with infratentorial primary tumors. The sites included the brainstem (n = 5), cerebellum (n = 1), and a combination of both brainstem and cerebellum (n = 2). One death was attributed to necrosis 24 months after the first imaging evidence of necrosis. Measured from the start of CSI, the median time to the first imaging evidence of necrosis was 4.8 months (range, 2.5–9.8 months), and for symptomatic necrosis it was 6.0 months (range, 4.2–7.9 months). The cumulative incidence of necrosis estimated at 5 years was 3.7% ± 1.3% (n = 236) for the entire cohort and 4.4% ± 1.5% (n = 196) for those with infratentorial tumors. With a prescribed cranial dose of 23.4 Gy (n = 148) and > 23.4 Gy (n = 88), the estimated 5-year cumulative incidence of necrosis was 2.7% ± 1.4% for those with a prescribed cranial dose of 23.4 Gy (n = 148) and 5.3% ± 2.6% for those receiving > 23.4 Gy (n = 88; p = 0.4486).

Table 1.

Patient and treatment characteristics.

ALL
PATIENTS
NO(%)
PATIENTS
WITHOUT
NECROSIS
NO(%)
PATIENTS
WITH
NECROSIS
NO(%)

SEX
Female 87 (36.86) 83 (36.40) 4 (50)

Male 149 (63.13) 145 (61.44) 4 (50)

RACE
Asian 5 (2.12) 5 (2.19) 0

Asian and White 1 (0.42) 1 (0.44) 0

Black 34 (14.41) 30 (13.16) 4 (50)

Black and White 1 (0.42) 1 (0.44) 0

Multiple Race
(NOS)
1 (0.42) 1 (0.44) 0

Other 14 (5.93) 14 (6.14) 0

White 180 (76.27) 176 (77.19) 4 (50)

DIAGNOSIS
Medulloblastoma
186 (78.81) 179 (78.51) 7 (87.50)
AT/RT
24 (10.17) 23 (10.09 1 (12.50)
SPNET
19 (8.05) 19 (8.33) 0
Pineoblastoma
7 (2.97) 7 (3.07) 0
RISK GROUP
Average-Risk 148 (62.71) 144 (63.16) 4 (50)

High-Risk 88 (37.29) 84 (36.84) 4 (50)

LOCATION
Infratentorial 195 (82.63) 187 (82.02) 8 (100)

Spinal cord 3 (1.27) 3 (1.32) 0

Supratentorial 38 (16.10) 38 (16.67) 0

EXTENT OF SURGERY

Biopsy 6 (2.54) 6 (2.63) 0

STR 24 (10.17) 23 (10.09) 1 (12.50)

NTR 40 (16.95) 39 (17.11) 1 (12.50)

GTR 166 (70.34) 160 (70.18) 6 (75.00)

NUMBER OF
RESECTIONS

1 181 (76.69) 175 (76.75) 6 (75.00)

>1 55 (23.31) 53 (23.25) 2 (25.00)

TOTAL 236 228 8

Table 2.

Clinical characteristics of patients with necrosis

Age
(yr)/Sex
Risk
Group
Time to
Necrosis
Imaging
Time to
Necrosis
Symptomatic
Neurological
Deficits
Grade Treatments
and
Interventions
Time to
Imaging
Resolution
6.9/F AR 9.8 NA None 1 None 84.6
10.9/M AR 2.5 6.1 CN Deficits 3 Dexamethasone HBOT, Gtube 7.1
10.7/F AR 2.8 5.5 CN deficits 3 Dexamethasone HBOT, LMWH 53.2
5.4/M HR 5.5 6.9 CN Deficits 3 Dexamethasone 6.3
9.0/F HR 2.7 4.2 Respiratory Failure 4 Dexamethasone tracheostomy, Gtube NA
6.7/F HR 4.8 5.7 CN Deficits, Quadriplegia, Respiratory Failure 4 Dexamethasone HBOT, Bevacizumab, tracheostomy NA
3.9/M AR 4.9 7.9 Quadriplegia, Respiratory Failure 4 Dexamethasone Tracheostomy, Gtube 12.7
8.3/M HR 5.0 6.0 Quadriplegia, Respiratory Failure 5 Dexamethasone Tracheostomy, Gtube NA

Abbreviations: CN = cranial nerve HBOT = hyperbaric oxygen therapy; LMWH = low molecular weight heparin; AR = average-risk; HR = high-risk.

The mean relative volume of infratentorial brain (combined brainstem and cerebellum) receiving a radiation dose ≥ 50 Gy, ≥ 52 Gy, and ≥ 54 Gy was significantly higher for patients with necrosis, at 92.12% ± 4.58, 88.95% ± 5.50, and 82.28% ± 7.06, compared with 72.89% ± 1.96 (p = 0.0337), 69.16% ± 1.97 (p = 0.0275), and 63.37% ± 1.96 (p = 0.0488), respectively, for patients without necrosis (Fig 1). Logistic regression analysis yielded an odds ratio of 1.021 (95% CI: 0.996–1.047) for absolute and 1.026 (95% CI: 0.996–1.057) for risk of necrosis due to relative infratentorial volume receiving radiation dose ≥ 52 Gy. The relative volume of brain, brainstem, and spinal cord receiving radiation doses ≥ 50 Gy and up to 60 Gy was not statistically different for patients with and without necrosis. For patients with necrosis, the mean volume of infratentorial brain receiving ≥ 5000cGy, ≥ 5200cGy, and ≥ 5400cGy was 184.48mL, 178.96mL, and 167.32mL, respectively. For patients without necrosis, the mean volume of infratentorial brain receiving ≥ 5000cGy, ≥ 5200cGy, and ≥ 5400cGy was 131.21mL, 124.37mL, and 113.70mL. A subset analysis was performed for all patients with infratentorial tumors (n = 195) and patients with infratentorial tumors and high-risk disease (n = 70), but there were no significant predictors for necrosis from these subgroups. Age was also not found to be predictive of necrosis.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Infratentorial brain mean dose and volume curves for all patients (blue) and those with (maroon) and without (green) necrosis.

Necrosis was diagnosed with a combination of post-contrast T1-weighted MR enhancement and increased signal intensity on T2-weighted imaging in all 8 patients. MR spectroscopy was used to confirm necrosis in 3 of 8 patients. None of the patients underwent biopsy or were managed surgically. The time to symptoms from the first imaging evidence of necrosis ranged from <1 month to 3.5 months. Seven patients presented with neurologic symptoms, including new cranial neuropathies (4/8), quadriplegia (3/8), respiratory failure (4/8), dysphagia requiring gastrostomy tube placement (4/8), and tracheostomy with complete or partial mechanical ventilation dependence (4/8). Two patients developed new onset seizure disorders. Patients were treated with a combination of dexamethasone, bevacizumab, and hyperbaric oxygen therapy. Five of 8 patients developed metachronous enhancing lesions on follow-up imaging up to 6 years after the initial diagnosis of necrosis. Five patients had imaging resolution at a median time of 12.7 months (range, 6.4–84.6 months) after the diagnosis of necrosis. Two additional patients have not yet had imaging resolution 5.4 and 9.3 months after the diagnosis of necrosis. The estimated 5-year overall survival for all patients was 80.3% ± 3.5%.

Discussion

Impact of Patient and Clinical Factors

Although CNS embryonal tumors are the most common malignant brain tumors in children and large prospective clinical trials have been performed by cooperative groups, the incidence and risk factors for CNS necrosis are not precisely defined. The lack of information from historical series may be attributed to the low incidence and additional factors, including poor disease control, lack of long-term follow-up, and misdiagnosis.

Indeed, early medulloblastoma studies had gross total resection (GTR) rates of 36% to 46% (11) and poorer outcomes than with our 70.3% GTR and 17% near total resection rates from this analysis. Children who undergo more aggressive surgery are more likely to be injured before initiating adjuvant therapy and more likely to develop severe complications from therapy. Most studies do not account for additional clinical factors such as postoperative meningitis, number of surgical procedures, neurologic deficits, posterior fossa syndrome, and hydrocephalus requiring a CSF shunt or tumor-related factors including extent of tumor and brainstem invasion. The Children’s Oncology Group (COG) performed a prospective study on the incidence and severity of cerebellar mutism syndrome (CMS) (12). They found that for average-risk patients, brainstem invasion and postoperative CNS infection correlated with the risk of CMS.

Clinical factors that influence brainstem toxicity are likely to affect the incidence of CNS necrosis. For ependymoma patients, brainstem toxicity is influenced by surgical morbidity and tumor extent (13). Similarly, surgical morbidity and prevalence of diabetes affects the degree of brainstem toxicity for patients with skull-based chordomas and chondrosarcomas (14). Three of our patients had brainstem invasion, and one had invasion of the left cerebellar peduncle noted in their operative reports; two patients required more than one surgical resection. Another patient required CSF shunting and underwent five shunt revisions before the diagnosis of necrosis. One patient had marked perioperative necrosis noted on imaging. Five patients had CMS, and four patients had postoperative meningitis. Each of these complicating factors may have reduced the threshold for these patients to develop necrosis.

Impact of Radiation Dose

We found that the percent of infratentorial brain receiving radiation doses ≥ 50 Gy, ≥ 52 Gy, and ≥ 54 Gy significantly predicted radiation necrosis in our patient population. We recommend dose constraints for the infratentorial brain as follows: the volume receiving ≥ 50 Gy should be no more than 73%, the volume receiving ≥ 52 Gy should be no more than 69%, and the volume receiving ≥ 54 Gy should be no more than 63%, based on the dose-volume histogram data of patients without necrosis. We anticipate < 1% risk of necrosis when these dose constraints are utilized for treatment planning for patients treated with aggressive surgical resection, CSI, and adjuvant chemotherapy.

One of the differences between our protocol and the current regimens used in the cooperative groups is the cumulative primary site dose of 55.8 Gy versus 54 Gy. Of note, 17 of the study patients received a prescribed primary site dose in excess of 55.8 Gy, and one of them developed necrosis. Given the high rate of survivorship, we may consider decreasing the total primary site dose to 54 Gy in future trials and using smaller CTV margins. We have used the dose-volume data from this series to create dose-volume histograms for the brain, brainstem, spinal cord, and infratentorial brain (Figure 2). These curves represent the dataset for which there is an estimated 3.7% incidence of necrosis. We offer this as a model for physicians to use when evaluating treatment plans and for future protocol development.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Brain (upper left), brainstem (upper right), infratentorial brain (lower left), and spinal cord (lower right) mean percent volume receiving specific radiation doses ± standard deviation for all patients included in this study.

Higher radiation dose (15) and higher dose per fraction (16) have been associated with an increased risk of radiation necrosis. The prospective data most commonly referenced for rates of radiation necrosis come from a dose escalation study (50.4 Gy/28 fractions versus 64.8 Gy/36 fractions) for adult low-grade glioma in which the low-dose arm had an actuarial 2-year incidence of 2.5% grade 3 to 5 radiation necrosis compared with 5% in the high-dose arm.(17) Ruben et al. (15) reviewed more than 400 glioma patients and found that in addition to total radiation dose and dose per fraction, radiation necrosis was related to the biologic equivalent dose and subsequent chemotherapy and that patients were unlikely to develop cerebral necrosis at doses below 50 Gy in 25 fractions. Because all of our patients had similar dose-intense chemotherapy, we were unable to assess the impact of chemotherapy in our patients. However, our 3.7% incidence of necrosis is comparable to the published rates for adult glioma treated with 1.8 Gy per fraction.

Necrosis Diagnosis

The gold standard to diagnose radiation necrosis has been biopsy; however, surgical intervention may increase morbidity, especially when considering the brainstem and cerebellum. Several imaging modalities have been investigated for their ability to diagnose necrosis and distinguish between necrosis and recurrent tumor. These modalities include T1- and T2-weighted MRI, diffusion-tensor imaging, MR spectroscopy, and perfusion MR. We relied on serial changes, including increasing parenchymal enhancement on post-contrast T1 images and increasing volume of T2-weighted MR imaging signal abnormality. We found that resolution of necrosis can be a long process during which lesions can show signs of improvement followed by progression in the same or other sites before stabilizing. None of the patients with necrosis were diagnosed with recurrence.

White matter changes on follow-up MR imaging attributed to the combined effects of chemotherapy and radiation therapy appear to be prevalent in children with brain tumors. One series included 24 children treated with radiation therapy and high-dose chemotherapy reported an MRI lesion-free survival rate of 74% ± 6% at 1 year and 57% ± 8% at 2 years. (18) Understanding the relationship between white matter changes and radiation necrosis is important, because these changes may represent early necrosis. Perhaps when faced with early post-treatment imaging changes, a short follow-up with the best combination of imaging would help diagnose necrosis and enable early treatment intervention to reduce its sequelae.

Necrosis Treatment

Corticosteroids are considered frontline therapy for radiation necrosis and hyperbaric oxygen has been used adjunctively with mixed results (19). Recently, bevacizumab has shown promise as a treatment for radiation necrosis (20). Reducing vascular permeability has been postulated as the mechanism of action for bevacizumab.

Conclusions

Brain necrosis in patients with CNS embryonal tumors is an uncommon yet important side effect often leading to devastating neurologic consequences. When competing risk of death by any cause is considered, the cumulative incidence is 3.7% and may be higher in specific subgroups. The proportion of infratentorial brain volume receiving more than 50 Gy can be used to predict necrosis. Adherence to suggested dose constraints may reduce the incidence of necrosis for this patient population.

Data from prospective trials was used to estimate the incidence and risk factors associated with CNS necrosis for children with embryonal tumors treated with surgery, craniospinal irradiation, and chemotherapy. The analysis predicts an incidence of 3.7% at 5 years. The proportion of infratentorial brain volume receiving more than 50 Gy is predictive of necrosis. These findings suggest adherence to dose constraints may reduce the incidence of necrosis for this patient population.

Acknowledgement

This work was supported in part by the National Cancer Institute, Cancer Center Support Grant 5 P30 CA21765-28, The Noyes Brain Tumor Foundation, Musicians Against Childhood Cancer (MACC), and the American Lebanese Syrian Associated Charities (ALSAC).

Footnotes

Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST NOTIFICATION PAGE

There are no conflicts of interest with the authors or materials in this manuscript.

References

  • 1.Gajjar A, Chintagumpala M, Ashley D, et al. Risk-adapted craniospinal radiotherapy followed by high-dose chemotherapy and stem-cell rescue in children with newly diagnosed medulloblastoma (St Jude Medulloblastoma-96): long-term results from a prospective, multicentre trial. Lancet Oncol. 2006;7:813–820. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(06)70867-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Packer RJ, Goldwein J, Nicholson HS, et al. Treatment of children with medulloblastomas with reduced-dose craniospinal radiation therapy and adjuvant chemotherapy: A Children's Cancer Group Study. J Clin Oncol. 1999;17:2127–2136. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1999.17.7.2127. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Zeltzer PM, Boyett JM, Finlay JL, et al. Metastasis stage, adjuvant treatment, and residual tumor are prognostic factors for medulloblastoma in children: conclusions from the Children's Cancer Group 921 randomized phase III study. J Clin Oncol. 1999;17:832–845. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1999.17.3.832. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Chintagumpala M, Hassall T, Palmer S, et al. A pilot study of risk-adapted radiotherapy and chemotherapy in patients with supratentorial PNET. Neuro Oncol. 2009;11:33–40. doi: 10.1215/15228517-2008-079. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Tekautz TM, Fuller CE, Blaney S, et al. Atypical teratoid/rhabdoid tumors (ATRT): improved survival in children 3 years of age and older with radiation therapy and highdose alkylator-based chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23:1491–1499. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.05.187. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Ris MD, Packer R, Goldwein J, et al. Intellectual outcome after reduced-dose radiation therapy plus adjuvant chemotherapy for medulloblastoma: a Children's Cancer Group study. J Clin Oncol. 2001;19:3470–3476. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2001.19.15.3470. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Laughton SJ, Merchant TE, Sklar CA, et al. Endocrine outcomes for children with embryonal brain tumors after risk-adapted craniospinal and conformal primary-site irradiation and high-dose chemotherapy with stem-cell rescue on the SJMB-96 trial. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26:1112–1118. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2008.13.5293. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Schell MJ, McHaney VA, Green AA, et al. Hearing loss in children and young adults receiving cisplatin with or without prior cranial irradiation. J Clin Oncol. 1989;7:754–760. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1989.7.6.754. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Lawrence YR, Li XA, el Naqa I, et al. Radiation dose-volume effects in the brain. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2010;76:S20–S27. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.02.091. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Mayo C, Yorke E, Merchant TE. Radiation associated brainstem injury. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2010;76:S36–S41. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.08.078. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Tait DM, Thornton-Jones H, Bloom HJ, et al. Adjuvant chemotherapy for medulloblastoma: the first multi-centre control trial of the International Society of Paediatric Oncology (SIOP I) Eur J Cancer. 1990;26:464–469. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Robertson PL, Muraszko KM, Holmes EJ, et al. Incidence and severity of postoperative cerebellar mutism syndrome in children with medulloblastoma: a prospective study by the Children's Oncology Group. J Neurosurg. 2006;105:444–451. doi: 10.3171/ped.2006.105.6.444. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Merchant TE, Chitti RM, Li C, et al. Factors associated with neurological recovery of brainstem function following postoperative conformal radiation therapy for infratentorial ependymoma. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2010;76:496–503. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.01.079. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Debus J, Hug EB, Liebsch NJ, et al. Brainstem tolerance to conformal radiotherapy of skull base tumors. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1997;39:967–975. doi: 10.1016/s0360-3016(97)00364-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Ruben JD, Dally M, Bailey M, et al. Cerebral radiation necrosis: incidence, outcomes, and risk factors with emphasis on radiation parameters and chemotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2006;65:499–508. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2005.12.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Safdari H, Fuentes JM, Dubois JB, et al. Radiation necrosis of the brain: time of onset and incidence related to total dose and fractionation of radiation. Neuroradiology. 1985;27:44–47. doi: 10.1007/BF00342516. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Shaw E, Arusell R, Scheithauer B, et al. Prospective randomized trial of low- versus high-dose radiation therapy in adults with supratentorial low-grade glioma: initial report of a North Central Cancer Treatment Group/Radiation Therapy Oncology Group/Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group study. J Clin Oncol. 2002;20:2267–2276. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2002.09.126. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Spreafico F, Gandola L, Marchiano A, et al. Brain magnetic resonance imaging after high-dose chemotherapy and radiotherapy for childhood brain tumors. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2008;70:1011–1019. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2007.07.2377. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Chuba PJ, Aronin P, Bhambhani K, et al. Hyperbaric oxygen therapy for radiationinduced brain injury in children. Cancer. 1997;80:2005–2012. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0142(19971115)80:10<2005::aid-cncr19>3.0.co;2-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Liu AK, Macy ME, Foreman NK. Bevacizumab as therapy for radiation necrosis in four children with pontine gliomas. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2009;75:1148–1154. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2008.12.032. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES