Skip to main content
The Open Dentistry Journal logoLink to The Open Dentistry Journal
. 2012 Dec 14;6:189. doi: 10.2174/1874210601206010189

Erratum

The Open Dentistry Journal, 2010, volume (4): page. 191-194, 191-194 Bruno O [corrected to Orlando B]

PMCID: PMC3529538

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Polishing may increase the surface roughness of composites, with a possible effect on bacterial growth and material properties. This preliminary in vitro study evaluates the effect of three different polishing systems (PoGo polishers, Enhance, Venus Supra) on six direct resin composites (Gradia Direct, Venus, Venus Diamond, Enamel Plus HFO, Tetric Evoceram, Filtek Supreme XT).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

For each composite, 12 square specimens were prepared: 9 specimens were polished, three for each different method, while three specimens were used as controls. Surface roughness was determined with AFM by measuring Root Mean Square (RMS) of average height.

RESULTS

PoGo polisher determined a significantly rougher surface, versus controls, in 5 out of 6 composites evaluated. Some significant differences from unpolished controls were observed also for Enhance polishing. Polishing with Venus Supra did not result in any significant difference in surface roughness versus controls. No differences were observed between different polishing systems.

CONCLUSIONS

These preliminary results suggest that Venus Supra polishing system could determine a smoother composite surface if compared to the other polishing systems tested. On this basis, we are conducting an in vivo study to evaluate bacterial colonization on some combinations of composites and polishing protocols.


Articles from The Open Dentistry Journal are provided here courtesy of Bentham Science Publishers

RESOURCES