In this article, some of the data in table 1 were incorrect. The correct table should be:
Table 1.
Protection induce by repetitive immunization with infected hepatocytes
| Route of injection | No. of mice Infected/Injected1 | Protection (%) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Antigen | Priming | Boosting1 | ||
| – | ||||
| – | – | – | 5/5 | 0 |
| Irradiated sporozoites3 | i.v. | i.v. | 0/5 | 100 |
| Infected hepatocytes4 | i.s.5 | i.p. | 6/12 | 50 |
| Normal hepatocytes6 | i.s. | i.p. | 7/7 | 0 |
| Infected hepatocytes | i.p. | i.p. | 7/7 | 0 |
| Normal hepatocytes | i.p. | i.p. | 5/5 | 0 |
Mice were boosted twice with the antigen 7 days apart.
Mice were challenged with 3000 P. berghei sporozoites.
Mice were immunized with 1000 irradiated P. berghei sporozoites.
Infected hepatocytes were obtained after liver biopsy perfusion from mice injected with 106 irradiated P. berghei sporozoites.
Intrasplenic injection.
Normal hepatocytes were obtained after liver biopsy perfusion from normal mice.
Reference
- Rénia L, Rodrigues M, Nussenzweig V. Intrasplenic immunization with infected hepatocytes: a mouse model for studying protective immunity against malaria pre-erythrocytic stage. Immunology. 1994;82:164–68. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
