We are delighted to report that Neuro-Oncology experienced yet another year of growth and success in 2012.
Impact Factor and Rankings
The journal's focus on quality contributed to its most recent impact factor of 5.723 (Figure 1). This score is particularly exciting because it is the first to reflect our change to monthly publication in 2010. Neuro-Oncology is now ranked 22 of 194 oncology journals and 15 of 191 clinical neurology journals.
Fig. 1.
Neuro-Oncology's impact factors, 2002–2011. The impact factor, published annually by Thomson Scientific in the Journal Citation Reports, is determined using article citation rates and is used to measure journal quality.
Increase in Submitted and Published Articles
We are also pleased to report a substantial increase in the number of new submissions in 2012, with a projected 905 new and revised manuscripts (672 new and 233 revised). This total represents an increase of 35% over the previous year. From January 1 through October 31, 130 papers were accepted for publication. Our acceptance rate of approximately 19% reflects our continued dedication to publishing only the most significant research.
Through the December issue, Neuro-Oncology published 149 articles in 1528 pages (versus 102 in 1380 pages in 2011). As of October 31, we had received manuscripts from 37 countries. Approximately half of all accepted papers were from the United States and Canada; 31% were from Europe, 15% were from Asia, and the remainder were from other countries (including Central and South America and Australia). The percentage of submissions from Asia also increased, from 20% in 2011 to 25%.
Volume 15 News
As we reported in the June 2012 issue of Neuro-Oncology (1), a substantial percentage of the cell lines used in medical research are contaminated or misidentified. To help address this issue, beginning in volume 15, we will begin requiring a statement of cell line validation in all manuscripts in which cell lines are used. This policy is similar to that in place for all American Association for Cancer Research journals, among others. All authors should describe their validation methods or briefly explain why validation was not needed. We ask all peer reviewers to be vigilant about this issue when evaluating submitted work.
Peer and Statistical Reviewers
Neuro-Oncology is indebted to the members of its editorial board (whose names appear in every issue of the journal) and its numerous peer and statistical reviewers, all of whom have helped it along its path to success. Listed below are reviewers who had agreed to conduct manuscript reviews as of September 30. The staff apologizes for any inadvertent omissions.
Roger Abounader
Manish Aghi
Yukinori Akiyama
Francis Ali-Osman
James Angelastro
Terri Armstrong
Ute Bartels
Elizabeth Beierle
Michael Berens
Jaclyn Biegel
Stefan Blüml
Wolfgang Bohn
Eric Bouffet
Michael Brada
Alba Brandes
Cameron Brennan
Alberto Broniscer
Nicholas Butowski
J. Gregory Cairncross
Robert Castellino
Arnab Chakravarti
Alain Charest
Pin-Yuan Chen
Jennifer Clarke
Timothy Cloughesy
Charles Cobbs
Kenneth Cohen
Rivka Colen
Howard Colman
Sidney Croul
Johannes Czernin
Faith Davis
John de Groot
Waldemar Debinski
Jean-Yves Delattre
Steven Devleeschouwer
Peter Dirks
Francois Doz
Francois Ducray
Charles Eberhart
Anat Erdreich-Epstein
Bradley Erickson
Christian Farrar
Andres Ferreri
Graziella Filippini
Howard Fine
Paul Fisher
Nicholas Foreman
John Forsayeth
Peter Forsyth
Maryam Fouladi
Henry S. Friedman
Juan Fueyo-Margareto
Takamitsu Fujimaki
Mitsugu Fujita
Felice Giangaspero
Mark Gilbert
Richard Gilbertson
Candece Gladson
Candelaria Gomez-Manzano
Gerald Grant
Corinne Griguer
Morris Groves
Eric Guedj
Nalin Gupta
Daphne Haas-Kogan
C. Oliver Hanemann
Chunhai (Charlie) Hao
Elke Hattingen
Cynthia Hawkins
Christel Herold-Mende
Ulrich Herrlinger
Kenneth Hess
Yuichi Hirose
Katherine Hoadley
Khê Hoang-Xuan
Suyun Huang
Peter Inskip
Yasuo Iwadate
Fabio Iwamoto
Nada Jabado
Andreas Jacobs
Rajan Jain
Mark Johnson
Dieter Kabelitz
Bernd Kaina
Michel Kalamarides
Andrew Kaye
Santosh Kesari
Raja Khan
Chifumi Kitanaka
Peter Krauseneck
Johan Kros
Ashok Kumar
Larry Kun
Nadia Laack
Anand Lagoo
Florence Laigle-Donadey
Kathleen Lamborn
Katrin Lamszus
Joseph Landolfi
Heiner Lanfermann
Frederick Lang
Peder Larson
Andrew Lassman
Justin Lathia
Florence Lefranc
Laurent Lemaire
Maciej Lesniak
Xiao-Nan Li
Maria Beatriz Lopes
Lorenzo Magrassi
Keishi Makino
Warren Mason
Tracy McKnight
Alex McMillan
Duane Mitchell
Shin-Ichi Miyatake
Sabine Mueller
Akitaka Mukasa
Motoo Nagane
Jean Nakamura
Yoko Nakasu
Sarah Nelson
Edward Neuwelt
Theodore Nicolaides
Andrew Norden
Brian O'Neill
Takanori Ohnishi
Hideho Okada
Roger Packer
John Park
Giorgio Perilongo
Anders Persson
Joanna Phillips
Karl Plate
Michael Platten
Whitney Pope
Hans Poulsen
Robert Prins
Alfredo Quinones-Hinojosa
Samuel Rabkin
Jeffrey Raizer
Zvi Ram
Sandra Rempel
Lucy Rorke-Adams
Steven Rosenfeld
James Rubenstein
Deepa Sampath
Raymond Sawaya
Kathleen Schmainda
S. Clifford Schold
Judith Schwartzbaum
Andrew Sloan
Robert Sobol
Kazuhiko Sugiyama
Erik Sulman
Ghazaleh Tabatabai
Uri Tabori
Jun Takahashi
Hideo Takeshima
Tomoki Todo
Rheal Towner
Keisuke Ueki
Roland Ullrich
Ratna Vadlamudi
Mariano Viapiano
Samuel Weiss
Theresa Whiteside
Margaret Wrensch
Xifeng Wu
Hai Yan
Takaaki Yanagisawa
Isaac Yang
Seiichi Yoshida
David Zagzag
Xiang Zhang
Reference
- 1.Yung WK. The value of cell line validation. Neuro-Oncol. 2012;14(6):675. doi: 10.1093/neuonc/nos132. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

