Skip to main content
Clinical and Vaccine Immunology : CVI logoLink to Clinical and Vaccine Immunology : CVI
. 2012 Dec;19(12):1898–1906. doi: 10.1128/CVI.00501-12

Antibody Responses to Mycobacterial Antigens in Children with Tuberculosis: Challenges and Potential Diagnostic Value

Jacqueline M Achkar 1,, Anke Ziegenbalg 1
PMCID: PMC3535867  PMID: 23100476

Abstract

The identification of easily detectable biomarkers for active tuberculosis (TB) is a global health priority. Such biomarkers would be of particular value in childhood TB, which poses greater diagnostic challenges than adult TB. Serum antibodies can be detected by simple formats that provide extremely rapid results. However, attempts to develop accurate serodiagnostic tests for TB have been unsuccessful. Whereas antibody responses to mycobacterial antigens in adult TB have been studied extensively and reviewed, the same cannot be said for serologic data in pediatric populations. Here we appraise studies on serological responses in childhood TB and discuss findings and limitations in the context of the developing immune system, the age range, and the spectrum of TB manifestations. We found that the antibody responses to mycobacterial antigens in childhood TB can vary widely, with sensitivities and specificities ranging from 14% to 85% and from 86% to 100%, respectively. We conclude that the limitations in serodiagnostic studies of childhood TB are manifold, thereby restricting the interpretation of currently available data. Concerns about the methodology used in published studies suggest that conclusions about the eventual value of serodiagnosis cannot be made at this time. However, the available data suggest a potential adjunctive value for serology in the diagnosis of childhood TB. Despite the difficulties noted in this field, there is optimism that the application of novel antigens and the integration of those factors which contribute to the serological responses in childhood TB can lead to useful future diagnostics.

INTRODUCTION

Active tuberculosis (TB) is a major cause of morbidity and mortality in children, especially in resource-limited countries, in which children under the age of 15 years account for approximately 15 to 20% of the disease burden (19, 39). Infection with Mycobacterium tuberculosis in children is generally the consequence of household transmission from an adult incident case. Thus, it is not surprising that 75% of the estimated 1 million annual pediatric TB cases occur in the 22 high-burden countries (69). While adult TB is commonly due to reactivation, pediatric TB is typically a primary disease. In addition, there are considerable differences in host immune responses between adults and young children. The results are a more atypical clinical manifestation with a paucity of classical signs and symptoms in pediatric TB, resulting in considerably higher challenges to establish TB diagnosis than in adults.

In young children, TB frequently disseminates and can be rapidly progressive early in life before immune competency is fully developed (36). Therefore, diagnostic delay quickly leads to increased morbidity and mortality, and rapid diagnosis becomes particularly important. However, the differences in disease manifestation of pediatric and adult TB result in reduced sensitivities for TB diagnostic tests. For example, cavitary disease is uncommon in children while up to 30% have extrapulmonary manifestations indicative of early disease dissemination (38). The yield of sputum smear microscopy, the most commonly used rapid test for adult TB, is 10 to 15%, and often less than 10%, in childhood TB, an amount which is substantially less than the yield in adults (about 50%) (17, 42). Even culture, the gold standard test for adult TB, detects a maximum of 30 to 40% of pediatric TB cases, and in most settings, the detection rate is below 20% (17, 42, 53). A recent study evaluating nucleic acid detection with the WHO-endorsed test Xpert MTB/RIF (Cepheid, CA) in South African children demonstrated improved sensitivity (13%) of this rapid method compared to that of sputum microscopy (6%), although mycobacterial culture remained slightly superior (16%) (42). To complicate matters further, young children often do not cough, and even when they do, they are frequently unable to provide a sputum sample (70). Alternative specimens, such as induced sputum or gastric aspirates, are more difficult to collect and do not have a higher sensitivity (70). Plausibly, the low yield of specimens originating from the respiratory tract may also be due to the fact that many of the pediatric TB cases are lymphohematogenous rather than pulmonary parenchymal disease. Furthermore, unless children have significant peripheral lymphadenopathy, sampling of extrapulmonary tissue is commonly not feasible. Therefore, the optimal diagnostic test for pediatric TB should provide rapid results and utilize an easily accessible specimen independent from the site of disease, such as blood or urine.

The amplifying power of the systemic immune responses can potentially detect infection with M. tuberculosis at a low antigen threshold and distant from the site of infection. Assays that detect M. tuberculosis infection by measuring gamma interferon release of circulating lymphocytes in response to M. tuberculosis-specific antigens (IGRAs) are more accurate than the tuberculin skin test (TST) (25). However, they require cell culture techniques that are not feasible in most resource-limited settings. The value of IGRAs in detecting latent TB infection (LTBI) and TB in children has been recently reviewed (60). In comparison to the TST, IGRAs show similar sensitivity in detecting TB in children (70 to 90%) (15). However, the sensitivity of IGRAs for TB diminishes in low-income countries (40 to 80%), a discrepancy that has yet to be explained (15). There are insufficient data to adequately assess the performance of IGRAs in comparison to the TST in children less than 5 years old. The studies that do exist show reduced rates of sensitivity and higher rates of indeterminate IGRAs in children under 5 years old (34). Most importantly, just as in adults, neither the TST nor IGRAs can distinguish TB disease from the asymptomatic state of infection, LTBI (reviewed in reference 41).

Detection of serum antibodies (Abs) is an attractive diagnostic option because it does not require a specimen from the site of disease and can be scaled up into robust and inexpensive formats requiring little laboratory infrastructure. Furthermore, Abs can be detected by simple “dip-stick” formats that provide extremely rapid results and thus can serve as point-of-care tests applicable in all settings (11, 46, 59). In contrast to IGRAs, Ab detection assays based on a variety of mycobacterial antigens can distinguish between LTBI and TB (reviewed in reference 62). However, TB serology has suffered from decades of unsuccessful attempts to develop accurate tests for TB in adult as well as pediatric populations (6365). Despite these setbacks, there are continuing efforts to discover new mycobacterial antigens for potential serodiagnostic tests. Many mycobacterial antigens have been evaluated for the serodiagnosis of adult TB, and that literature has been extensively reviewed elsewhere (1, 32, 62, 68). In contrast, data in pediatric populations are limited and, to our knowledge, have not been reviewed previously. The objective of this review is to appraise and discuss studies that have evaluated Abs to mycobacterial antigen in pediatric populations. We searched the electronic databases PubMed and Web of Science for articles in the English language published from 1980 to 2012. Keywords used included “tuberculosis,” “Mycobacterium tuberculosis,” “immunology,” “serology,” “diagnosis,” “serodiagnosis,” “antigen,” “antibody,” and “immunoglobulin,” which were referenced to all forms of “children,” “pediatric,” and “infants.” Additional studies were identified by searching the reference lists of primary studies and review articles. In contrast to systematic reviews and meta-analysis, we have not limited our search to certain study designs or enrollment numbers but address study limitations in the text. We limited our review to published studies that focused on the evaluation of serum Ab responses for diagnostic purposes.

THE DEVELOPING IMMUNE SYSTEM IN CHILDREN

When interpreting serologic data in children, it is helpful to first understand how their immune system develops. Some of the challenges in pediatric serology can be explained by the slow development of the humoral immune responses in infants and young children. In newborns, a rapid increase of antigenic encounters elicits the production of immunoglobulin M (IgM), which later switches to the more protective isotypes IgG and IgA (44). Despite low levels of its own IgG, the infant is initially protected against infection by maternal Abs. Nursing infants have the benefit of also receiving IgA, which is secreted into breast milk and provides protection from newly encountered bacteria in the gut. Maternal IgGs are commonly present up to 9 months of age depending on the disease type, but protective effects often decline after 6 months (55). Supporting evidence of a delayed humoral immune response comes from vaccination data in infants. Vaccines that elicit Ab responses to protein antigens, such as the toxins in pertussis and tetanus vaccine, are effective in eliciting an IgG1 subclass response but require multiple doses to increase the duration of protection if given before 6 months of age (56). Antibody responses to many polysaccharide antigens, which typically involve IgG2, are even lower in infants, rendering them particularly susceptible to infections by encapsulated bacteria, such as Streptococcus pneumoniae, Haemophilus influenzae, and M. tuberculosis (72). Overall, Ab levels comparable to those in adults are not reached until later in life, with IgM reaching adult levels at age 2, IgG reaching adult levels at age 6, and IgA not reaching adult levels until the teenage years (51).

SEROLOGIC STUDIES EVALUATING THE DIAGNOSTIC VALUE OF ANTIBODY RESPONSES TO MYCOBACTERIAL ANTIGENS IN CHILDHOOD TB

We found 23 studies evaluating Ab responses to mycobacterial antigens for their diagnostic value in childhood TB. Eight studies assessed commercially available serodiagnostic tests for adult TB (Table 1), and the other 15 studies evaluated “in-house” Ab detection assays (Table 2). Overall, Ab responses to mycobacterial antigens in childhood TB varied widely, with sensitivities and specificities ranging from 14% to 85% and from 86% to 100%, respectively. Even when evaluating the same commercially available test, such as the Anda-TB Kit (Anda Biologicals, Strasbourg, France), sensitivities for detecting childhood TB ranged from 14% to 71% and specificities ranged from 50% to 100%, with part of the variability being due to the different isotypes tested (22, 24, 29, 66, 67) (Table 1). Such wide ranges in accuracy of serologic assays have also been observed in adult TB, although many of the reasons for this variability differ (reviewed in references 62 to 64). Several factors influence the accuracy of Ab detection assays for the serodiagnosis of TB in children. Most importantly, and in contrast to adult TB, the age of the child has the strongest impact on Ab responses regardless of antigen evaluated. Other important factors include the Ab isotype evaluated, the kind of antigen tested, how TB cases are defined and whether they are culture confirmed, the type of TB case evaluated, a recent history of Mycobacterium bovis BCG vaccination, and how cutoff values for positive assays are determined. Thus, sensitivity and specificity values in serological studies of childhood TB cannot be interpreted without taking these factors into consideration.

Table 1.

Studies evaluating accuracy of commercially available serodiagnostic tests for TB in childrena

Antigen (assay) Isotype Age (yr) Subject group (no. of subjects) Sensitivity Specificity Comments Reference
A60 (Anda-TB) IgG, IgM 0–11 TB (31) (14 culture+), healthy/TST+ (16), other diseases (198) IgG, 71% for culture+ TB and 65% for culture− TB; IgM, 19% IgG, 100%; IgM, 100% Small subgroups of TB cases when categorized by more-narrow age groups 22
A60 (Anda-TB) IgG, IgM 2–12 TB (29) (no culture info), healthy/TST− (28), other diseases/TST− (53), healthy/BCG vaccinated (9), healthy/recent TST+ (35), old TB (23), adenitis due to other mycobacteria (11) IgG, 14%; IgM, 24% IgG and IgM, 94–100%; 74% in old TB; 91% in adenitis due to other mycobacteria No information on M. tuberculosis culture results 67
A60 (Anda-TB) IgG, IgM, IgA 1–12 TB (208) (culture or clinically confirmed), probable TB (244), healthy (93), healthy TB contacts (15), other diseases (53) IgG, 32–48% depending on cutoff value; IgA, 36–38%; IgM, 55–57%; IgM and/or IgA, 82% IgG, 87–97% depending on cutoff value; IgM and/or IgA, 92% No categorization and comparison of results according to more-narrow age ranges; much higher IgM responses than in other studies with A60 29
A60, 38 kDa (Anda-TB and Pathozyme-TB Complex) A60, IgG and IgM; 38 kDa, IgG 1–12 TB (42) (35 pulmonary, 7 lymphadenitis), healthy (22) IgG (A60), 29%; IgM (A60), 71%; IgG (38 kDa), 45% IgG (A60), 86%; IgM (A60), 50%; IgG (38 kDa), 73% No comment on how TB cases were diagnosed and no culture results given; no analysis according to more-narrow age groups 66
PPD, HSP60, 38 kDa, 16 kDa (in-house ELISA, Pathozyme-Myco G, TB Complex Plus) IgG, IgA, IgE 0–15 TB (34) (poorly defined), healthy (46) (32 TST+, 14 TST−) IgG (PPD), 38%; IgA (PPD), 27%; IgE (PPD), 32%; IgG (HSP60), 38%; IgG (38 kDa and LAM), 20%; IgG (38 kDa and 16 kDa), 20% IgG (PPD), 96%; IgA (PPD), 93%; IgE (PPD), 77%; IgG (HSP60), 96%; IgG (38 kDa and LAM), 100%; IgG (38 kDa and 16 kDa), 100% Unclear how cutoff values were defined; rationale for testing IgE not addressed 3
A60, 38 kDa, 16 kDa, LAM (5 commercial tests)b IgG, IgA, IgM 0–18 TB (81) (25 culture+, 31 pulmonary, 41 lymphadenitis, 40 other extrapulmonary); TST+ (30); healthy and other diseases (82) IgG (38 kDa), 0% for <10 yrs and 42% for >10 yrs; IgG (38 kDa and 16 kDa), 14% for <10 yrs and 36% for >10 yrs; IgG (38 kDa and LAM), 13% for <10 yrs and 27% for >10 yrs; IgA (38 kDa and LAM): 3% for <10 yrs and 15% for >10 yrs; IgM (38 kDa and LAM), 24% for <10 yrs and 50% for >10 yrs; IgG (A60), 0% for <10 yrs and 25% for >10 yrs Low specificity for all 5 assays tested; no clear value given Mixtures of antigens tested in commercial kits; all subjects previously BCG vaccinated 24
16 kDa, 38 kDa (Pathozyme-TB Complex Plus) IgG 0–15 TB (32) (poorly defined; 24 pulmonary, 8 extrapulmonary), healthy (20), other diseases (20) 25% (60% in culture+ TB, 18% in culture− TB]) 90% TB cases poorly defined; no information on age distribution 52
TBLG (TBGL-Ab ELISA kit) IgG, IgA ≤12 TB (23) (all culture+), healthy (24) Low IgG and IgA responses in cases and controls, with no significant differences No values given Low sample numbers; no information on age distribution 54
a

A60, antigen 60, complex consisting of various proteins and the glycolipid lipoarabinomannan; 38 kDa, 38-kDa culture filtrate protein, also known as antigen 5; PPD, purified protein derivative; HSP60, 60-kDa heat shock protein; 16 kDa, 16-kDa heat shock protein; LAM, the glycolipid lipoarabinomannan; TBLG, glycolipid trehalose-6-6-dimycolate; Anda-TB Kit, IgG, IgA, and/or IgM against antigen 60; Pathozyme-TB Complex, IgG against the 38-kDa protein; Pathozyme-TB Complex Plus, IgG against the 38-kDa and 16-kDa proteins (Omega Diagnostics, Alloa, Scotland); Pathozyme MycoG, MycoA, and MycoM, IgG, IgA, and IgM against the 38-kDa protein and LAM (Omega Diagnostics, Scotland); TBGL-Ab ELISA kit, IgG and IgA against TBLG (Kyowa Medex, Tokyo, Japan); TST, tuberculin skin test; TST+, positive TST; TST−, negative TST.

b

Study evaluated Immunozyme Mycobacterium (IgG against A60; Assay Designs, Ann Arbor, MI).

Table 2.

Studies evaluating mycobacterial antigens with in-house Ab detection assays for serodiagnostic value in childhood TBa

Antigen Isotype Age (yr) Subject group (no. of subjects) Sensitivity Specificity Comments Reference
PPD IgG, IgM 0–14 TB (163) (49 culture+), healthy/not TST tested (17), healthy/TST+ (38), healthy/TST− (20), other diseases (38) IgG, 51% for culture+ TB (63% for smear+ TB, 36% for smear− TB); 28% for culture− TB; lower sensitivities with similar high specificity of IgM IgG, 98% in diseases other than TB and 88% in TST+ and 90% in TST− household contacts No categorization and comparison of results according to more-narrow age ranges 4
Ag5 IgG 1–14 TB (21) (all smear+ and culture+), healthy TB contacts (19) (all controls BCG vaccinated) 86% 100% No categorization and comparison of results according to more-narrow age ranges; high sensitivity likely due to evaluating only smear+ cases 2
Mycobacterial sonicates IgG <5 yrs TB (31), healthy (129) 21% 40% No description of ELISA method 48
Old tuberculin, PPD; 30 kDa IgG 0–12 TB (72) (no info on culture results), healthy (188) (83 BCG vaccinated and 0–5 yrs old, 104 BCG revaccinated and 6–12 yrs old) IgG (PPD), 50%; IgG (30 kDa), 36% IgG (PPD), 97% No comment on how TB cases were diagnosed 74
LOS, DAT, PGLTb1 IgG 0–18 TB (12) (7 pulmonary, 5 lymphadenitis), healthy TST+ (8), TB contacts (7), other diseases (26) 34% for culture+ TB, 33% for culture− TB 86% No description of ELISA method; small sample size 58
16 kDa IgG, IgM, IgA 0–14 TB (74) (29 culture+, 70 pulmonary, 4 extrapulmonary), healthy TB contacts (49), other diseases (149) IgG, 34% for culture+ and culture− TB; IgA, 19%; IgM, 3%; IgG and/or IgA, 43% For all isotypes, 95% for subjects with other diseases 30
16 kDa, 30 kDa IgG, IgM, IgA <15 TB (26) (9 smear+ and/or culture+, 3 lymphadenitis, 14 other extrapulmonary TB), healthy TST− (61) IgG and/or IgM and/or IgA (30 kDa), 85%; IgG and/or IgM and/or IgA (16 kDa), 73% For all isotypes and both proteins, 98% Graphs appear to be not consistent, with specificity claimed for all isotypes combined; no information given on age distribution 47
ES-31 IgG No age information TB (70) (no information on how TB was diagnosed; 30 pulmonary, 20 meningitis, 10 pleural, 10 lymphadenitis), healthy (50), other diseases (105) 81% 93% Poor description of ELISA method; no age information; no information on how TB was diagnosed 6
PPD, 38 kDa Salivary IgA 0–15 TB (31) (TB cases poorly defined), healthy/TST+ (53), healthy/TST− (43) Salivary IgA (38 kDa), 26%; salivary IgA (PPD), 8% Salivary IgA (38 kDa), 88% for TST+ and 93% for TST−; salivary IgA (PPD), 94% for TST+ and 95% for TST− TB cases poorly defined 23
ESAT6, PGLTb1 IgG <18 Two separate studies described; for anti-PGLTB1 Abs, TB (65) (10 culture+, 32 pulmonary, 13 lymphadenitis, 16 meningitis, 4 GI), controls (27) (not specified); for anti-ESAT6 Abs, TB (83) (29 culture+, 37 pulmonary, 19 lymphatic, 16 CNS, 11 GI), controls (27) (not specified) IgG (ESAT6), 49%; IgG (PGLTb1), 53% IgG (ESAT6), 96%; IgG (PGLTb1), 91% No description of ELISA method; no information on controls; no information on age distribution 21
Ag85 complex IgG 0–18 Suspected TB (83) (64 pulmonary [17 culture+], 19 meningitis [3 culture+]); healthy, mostly BCG vaccinated (32) 59% 72% No description of ELISA method; TB cases poorly defined; no information on age distribution 20
Ag85 complex, Ag85A, Ag85B, Ag85C, ESAT-6, CFP10 IgG <18 TB (88) (36 pulmonary, 20 lymphadenitis, 11 abdominal, 20 meningitis, 1 military), healthy (25), other diseases (17) IgG (Ag85 complex), 56%; IgG (85A), 32%; IgG (85B), 65%; IgG (85C), 90%; IgG (CFP10), 30%; IgG (all Ags and ESAT 6), 67% IgG (Ag85 complex), 72%; IgG (85A), 24%; IgG (85B), 64%; IgG (85C), 92%; IgG (CFP10), 80%; IgG (all Ags and ESAT 6), 80% No information on age distribution 31
a

PPD, purified protein derivative; Ag5, antigen 5, 38-kDa culture filtrate protein (also known as 38 kDa); 30 kDa, 30-kDa culture filtrate protein, more commonly known as antigen 85B; LOS, fractions 4 and 5 of polar lipids belonging to the lipo-oligosaccharide family; DAT, 2,3-diacyl trehalose, formerly also referred to as 2,3-diacyl-trehalose-2'-sulfate (SLIV) antigen; PGLTb1, glycolipid triglycosyl phenol phthiocerol dimycocerosate glycolipid antigen; HSP60, 60-kDa heat shock protein 60; ES-31, excretory-secretory antigen; ESAT6, early secretory antigen 6; Ag85 complex, antigen 85 complex consisting of the proteins Ag85A, 85B, and 85C; CFP10, culture filtrate protein 10; ATT, antituberculous therapy; TST, tuberculin skin test; smear+, smear positive; smear−, smear negative.

MYCOBACTERIAL ANTIGENS EVALUATED FOR SERODIAGNOSIS IN CHILDHOOD TB

The rationale for selecting certain mycobacterial antigens for serodiagnostic studies of pediatric TB was typically based on their performance in adult TB. Hence, none of the antigens evaluated as of today was selected based on data in pediatric populations. As in adult TB serology, the earlier studies tested children's Ab responses to crude mixtures of components and products of mycobacteria, such as mycobacterial sonicates or purified protein derivative (PPD) (3, 4, 23, 48, 74). Mycobacterial sonicates are obtained from whole-cell lysates, and PPD, often also referred to as tuberculin, is obtained from filtrates of sterilized, concentrated cultures of M. tuberculosis or other mycobacteria. These preparations are mixtures of a large variety of native, nonspecific mycobacterial antigens, including proteins, glycolipids, and polysaccharides. Studies assessing Ab responses to these antigen mixtures in children reported sensitivities ranging from 20% to 63% and specificities ranging from 40% to 97% (3, 4, 23, 48, 74). Several other studies evaluated a combination of antigens or antigen complexes, either in the form of commercially available kits or in the form of in-house enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA), while others evaluated single antigens, such as mycobacterial proteins or glycolipids, predominantly in the form of in-house assays. A few studies also included the evaluation of immune complexes (54, 58).

A number of commercially available tests for TB serodiagnosis have been evaluated in children, mostly based on their performance in adult TB (Table 1). Specifically, these include the Anda-TB kit (Anda Biologicals, Strasbourg, France), which is the most frequently evaluated test for childhood TB. The Anda-TB kit is available for testing IgG, IgA, and IgM responses to antigen 60 (A60), a highly immunogenic lipopolysaccharide-protein complex found primarily in the cytoplasm but also in the cell wall fractions of mycobacteria (12, 13). Another assay, the Immunozyme Mycobacterium (Assay Designs, Ann Arbor, MI), measures only IgG against A60. The A60 complex has about 30 components, of which some have been identified by monoclonal Abs (14). These components include LAM, a glycolipid of the mycobacterial cell wall, and proteins of various molecular masses, such as 65, 40, 38, 35, 19, and 14 kDa. The majority of the highly antigenic A60 complex proteins are found in most mycobacteria. Thus, similar to studies with PPD or mycobacterial sonicates, studies with A60-based assays evaluate serological responses to a broad mixture of mainly nonspecific native mycobacterial antigens, which may result in considerable cross-reactivity. Five studies have evaluated IgG, IgA, and IgM responses to A60 in children using the Anda-TB kit, with reported sensitivities ranging from 14% to 71% and specificities ranging from 50% to 100% (22, 24, 29, 66, 67) (Table 1).

Other commercial tests evaluated in childhood TB include the Pathozyme-TB Complex and the Pathozyme-TB Complex Plus (Omega Diagnostics, Alloa, Scotland), which measure IgG responses against the 38-kDa protein alone (Pathozyme-TB Complex) or against both the 38-kDa and 16-kDa proteins combined (Pathozyme-TB Complex Plus). The 38-kDa protein, previously also referred to as antigen 5 (Ag5), is an approximately 38-kDa protein present in the culture filtrates of M. tuberculosis and M. bovis (43). The 16-kDa protein belongs to the family of heat shock proteins and is a nonspecific cytosolic mycobacterial protein that elicits Ab responses in early mycobacterial infection and disease. These two nonspecific mycobacterial proteins have frequently been evaluated in serodiagnostic studies of adult TB and have been found to lack sensitivity and specificity (reviewed in references 62 and 64). Seven studies assessed Ab responses to the 38-kDa and/or 16-kDa protein in childhood TB, either in the form of the Pathozyme-TB tests (3 studies; Table 1) or in the form of an in-house ELISA (4 studies; Table 2) (24, 52, 66). The reported sensitivities and specificities of these studies ranged from 25% to 45% and from 73 to 90%, respectively. Further commercial assays evaluated included the Pathozyme Myco G, Myco A, and Myco M (Omega Diagnostics, Alloa, Scotland), measuring IgG, IgA, and IgM responses, respectively, to the 38-kDa protein and the glycolipid LAM, and the TBGL-Ab ELISA kit (Kyowa Medex, Tokyo, Japan), measuring IgG and IgA against the glycolipid cell wall antigen trehalose-6-6-dimycolate (TBLG). Sensitivities and specificities reported for these studies varied as widely as those with other commercial tests (Table 1).

Ab responses to further mycobacterial antigens evaluated via an in-house ELISA included (i) antigen 5 (Ag5)/the 38-kDa protein (2), (ii) the 30-kDa antigen, a culture filtrate protein, more commonly known as antigen 85B (47, 74), (iii) fractions 4 and 5 of polar lipids belonging to the lipo-oligosaccharide family (LOS) (58), (iv) 2,3-diacyl trehalose, formerly also referred to as 2,3-diacyl-trehalose-2′-sulfate (SLIV) antigen (DAT) (58), (v) the glycolipid antigen triglycosyl phenol phthiocerol dimycocerosate (PGLTb1) (58), (vi) the 16-kDa heat shock protein (30, 47), (vii) the 60-kDa heat shock protein (HSP60) (3), (viii) the excretory-secretory antigen (ES-31) (6), (ix) the early secretory antigen 6 (ESAT-6) (21, 31), (x) the antigen 85 complex consisting of the proteins Ag85A, 85B, and 85C (Ag85 complex) (20, 31), and (xi) culture filtrate protein 10 (CFP10) (31). Of these antigens, only ESAT-6 and CFP10 are M. tuberculosis complex specific, while the other antigens can be found in several other mycobacteria. As in adult TB, Ab responses to ESAT-6 and CFP10 were lower than those against several other antigens in pediatric TB (31, 57, 71). Sensitivities and specificities for the reported studies varied widely (Table 2), influenced by the factors discussed in detail. Of note, most investigators evaluating in-house Ab detection assays used the same groups of cases and controls to determine cutoff values and estimate sensitivity and specificity values (30, 31, 47, 74). In addition, many studies lacked a description of their assays, making data interpretation not possible (3, 6, 20, 21, 48).

INFLUENCE OF AGE ON SEROLOGIC RESPONSES TO MYCOBACTERIAL ANTIGENS

The maturation of the humoral immune system in infants and young children results in age-dependent differences in Ab responses to various antigens. Despite this well-known effect, only a limited number of serodiagnostic studies have analyzed and compared data according to more-narrow age groups. As can be anticipated, those that did have, in general, found lower IgG responses in very young children, especially infants, compared to children over 5 years old (22, 24). For example, among BCG-vaccinated children without TB, those older than 5 years had significantly higher IgG reactivity to A60, a complex consisting of nonspecific mycobacterial antigens, than those less than 5 years old (22). In concordance with these data, another study testing serological responses in children with TB via commercially available kits containing antigens, such as the 38-kDa protein, the 16-kDa protein, and LAM, found that IgG responses were significantly higher in children over 5 years than under 5 years old (24). Also, IgA responses to these antigens were significantly higher in children 10 years and older than in younger children (24). In contrast, IgM reactivity to several antigens varied widely in other studies, with no significant differences between age groups and considerable overlap between TB cases and controls (22, 24). Overall, except for IgM, the Ab responses to all mycobacterial antigens evaluated in young children were much lower than those reported in adults. A few studies assessing Ab responses in children also included adult TB cases, allowing for comparison of responses using the same methods in the same lab. In such studies, IgG and IgA responses were significantly higher in adults than in children with TB, regardless of the antigens tested (7, 54).

When evaluating the influence of age on Ab responses in young children, the type of antigen must also be taken into consideration. Pilkington et al. studied the development of IgG responses to mycobacterial antigens in BCG-unvaccinated children from the United Kingdom whose age ranged from 0 to over 10 years old (45). They tested IgG and IgG subclass responses to mycobacterial sonicates for a variety of slow- and fast-growing mycobacteria, including M. tuberculosis, to the lipopolysaccharide cell wall antigen LAM and to nonspecific 65- to 70-kDa heat shock proteins present in a variety of bacteria and mycobacteria. While IgG responses to mycobacterial sonicates were elevated during the first month of life, likely reflecting the transfer of maternal Abs, they decreased to almost undetectable levels between 1 and 23 months and only started increasing after 24 months, with a slower continued increase into the first decade of life. Interestingly, when IgG responses to mycobacterial sonicates and LAM were compared, they correlated strongly and significantly, suggesting that the predominant response to crude mycobacterial antigen preparations reflects mainly the response to LAM or potentially the response to the mycobacterial capsular polysaccharide arabinomannan (AM). This, as well as the relationship between age and IgG response, accords with the observation that IgG2 accounted for almost all the IgG responses to mycobacterial sonicates. In contrast, IgG response to the 70-kDa heat shock protein of M. tuberculosis started rising in infants as early as 6 months of age. These data, combined with data from the vaccine field, demonstrate that the age influence on IgG responses in infants and young children varies according to the antigen tested and likely reflects the differences in IgG subtype responses, with a delayed rise in IgG2 compared to other subtypes in infants and children under 2 years old.

SPECTRUM OF IMMUNOGLOBULIN ISOTYPE RESPONSES TO MYCOBACTERIAL ANTIGENS

Most serological studies in children found that IgG, although often not the predominant isotype, was the most specific response against mycobacterial antigens. Studies including IgM evaluation frequently also found higher levels of IgM than IgG. However, most of those studies indicated little diagnostic value of IgM due to considerable overlap between pediatric TB cases and controls (4, 22, 24, 67). The overlap of IgM responses to mycobacterial antigens in TB cases and controls is likely to reflect the response to initial infection with mycobacteria, including environmental organisms, in early childhood, regardless of progression to disease.

Typically, relatively low IgA responses were seen in children with TB. Studies reporting higher IgA responses reported them in older rather than younger children (24). Nevertheless, some studies documented an increase in sensitivity when including IgA with other isotype testing. For example, Imaz et al. found a poor correlation between IgG and IgA responses to the 16-kDa protein (30). Combining the assays increased the overall sensitivity from 34% for IgG and 19% for IgA to 43% for both, with only a limited reduction in specificity. On the other hand, Gupta et al. found 55% sensitivity for IgM, 36% for IgA, and 33% for IgG against A60 in definite pediatric TB cases (29). They found a good correlation between IgG and IgA responses without a major increase in sensitivity when combining these isotype responses. In contrast, when combining IgM and IgA detection assays, the sensitivity increased to 72%, with a reduction in specificity from the upper 90s to 92%.

ANTIBODY RESPONSES ACCORDING TO TYPE OF TB

With a few exceptions (30), the majority of studies found higher Ab responses to mycobacterial antigens in culture-confirmed than in nonconfirmed TB cases. This is not surprising, as in most settings, only about 20% of childhood TB cases are culture positive, and establishing TB diagnosis in the remaining suspected cases is very challenging (17, 42, 53). Therefore, while culture-positive cases can be considered confirmed cases, culture-negative cases are probable and possible cases presenting a heterogeneous and potentially “overdiagnosed” group that may also include non-TB cases. It is also plausible that culture-negative cases present a more paucibacillary disease stage with resulting lower Ab responses compared to culture-positive cases. Several studies support such causality. One pediatric study compared sensitivity between smear-positive (smear+) and smear-negative (smear−) culture-confirmed cases and found higher sensitivities for IgG against PPD in smear+ cases than in smear− cases (63% versus 36%, respectively) (4). Another study evaluated IgG responses to Ag5 only in smear+ culture-confirmed cases and reported considerably higher sensitivities (86%) than other studies (2). Furthermore, commercially available kits testing IgG and IgA responses to 38-kDa and 16-kDa proteins, the glycolipid LAM, and the antigen complex A60 have shown significantly higher sensitivities in cavitary than in noncavitary childhood TB (24). The higher Ab levels found in smear+ cases than in smear− cases and in cavitary cases than in noncavitary childhood TB are consistent with data in adult TB and may reflect a more advanced stage of the disease with a potentially higher mycobacterial burden and possibly more inflammatory responses (reviewed in references 62, 64, and 73). However, when considering such causality, one has to keep in mind that children under 10 years old rarely develop cavitary lesions that classically lead to smear positivity (37). Thus, age may be a strong confounder contributing to the higher Ab responses in smear-positive and cavitary childhood TB.

The clinical presentation of childhood TB varies according to age, with higher rates of dissemination in early childhood and a more adult-like presentation in adolescents (16, 26, 35, 37, 40, 50, 61), which is likely a reflection of the maturity of the immune system. Data indicate that Ab responses in children, just as in adults, vary according to clinical manifestations. Some studies evaluating Abs in different types of childhood TB found that responses in TB lymphadenitis and pulmonary TB were not significantly different (20, 29), while other studies found significantly lower Ab responses in TB lymphadenitis than in pulmonary TB (24). However, Ab responses were usually lower in meningeal and pleural TB (20, 29). Furthermore, consistent with the data in children, lower Ab responses to mycobacterial antigens have also been described in adults with pleural TB (49). On the other hand, the low Ab response in children with TB meningitis may also be due to the fact that this clinical manifestation is common in children under two years old (16). Nevertheless, Ab detection assays may have adjunctive value in detecting these forms of extrapulmonary TB due to the extremely low yield for culturing M. tuberculosis from cerebrospinal or pleural fluid. For example, Dayal et al. (21) detected serum IgG responses against the mycobacterial glycolipid PGLTb1 and the protein ESAT6 in 7/16 (44%) and 9/16 (56%) children with TB meningitis, respectively, in contrast to a positive cerebrospinal fluid culture in only 2/16 (13%). Thus, local Ab detection in such cases might have additional diagnostic value.

INFLUENCE OF BCG VACCINATION ON ANTIBODIES TO MYCOBACTERIAL ANTIGENS IN CHILDREN

Serological data in children reveal that the influence of BCG vaccination on Abs against mycobacterial antigens depends on several factors, the type of antigen tested, the isotype being evaluated, the timing between vaccination and Ab testing, and the children's age at the time of testing. A study assessing Ab responses of infants before and after BCG vaccination at an age of 1 to 2 months found a significant increase in IgM against PPD in the first serum samples obtained 2 months postvaccination and an increase in IgG against PPD 4 months postvaccination, with a continued increase until 15 months after vaccination (5). Nevertheless, studies found a relatively low impact of prior BCG vaccination on Ab responses in children less than 2 years old. For example, IgG reactivity against Ag60 was relatively low in children less than 2 years old, regardless of prior BCG vaccination, and the difference between vaccinated and unvaccinated children was negligible (22). In contrast, the difference in IgM reactivity to Ag60 between vaccinated and unvaccinated children less than 2 years old was larger and significant (22). In general, although a few studies have observed mild to moderate differences in Ab responses in children according to history of BCG vaccination, a higher number of studies testing a variety of mycobacterial antigens have not seen any effect, regardless of isotype and age group evaluated (2, 24, 29, 74).

LIMITATIONS OF AND ASPECTS TO CONSIDER IN SEROLOGICAL STUDIES OF CHILDHOOD TB

Several major study limitations must be taken into consideration when evaluating the data published on serological responses in childhood TB. First, most studies evaluated children with a broad age range (up to 0 to 14 years old) and, with few exceptions, did not analyze their data according to more-narrow age groups. Such subgroup analysis is necessary in serological studies of children because a part of the humoral immune response does not mature to adult levels until about 5 years of age (51). Infants less than 2 years old have considerably lower IgG responses, especially to polysaccharide antigens, than children more than 2 years old (reviewed in reference 72). Furthermore, during the first year of life, serum IgG is likely to reflect the maternal Abs transferred in utero. In addition, the clinical presentation of TB varies according to age, with higher rates of dissemination in early childhood and a more adult-like presentation in adolescents (16, 26, 35, 37, 40, 50, 61). Taking each of these aspects into account, it would be most sensible to categorize children into age groups such as (i) less than 1 year, (ii) 1 to 2 years, (iii) 2 to 5 years, (iv) 5 to 10 years, and (v) over 10 years when conducting future TB serology studies.

Second, due to the tremendous challenges in establishing a diagnosis, TB case definitions in children require a thorough description of symptoms, radiologic imaging, and diagnostic test results. Many methodological issues for conducting and reporting studies on diagnostics for pediatric TB have been identified recently (18). Stringent criteria for clinical case definitions of intrathoracic pediatric TB were defined and published by an expert panel this year (28). According to a variety of clinical and diagnostic criteria, the authors propose to categorize pediatric TB into “confirmed,” “probable,” “possible,” and “unlikely” TB cases. Many of the studies evaluating the potential value of Ab detection assays in children lack a detailed description of how TB was defined and some lacked even information on the proportion of culture-confirmed cases. Thus, the groups evaluated in serologic studies included various proportions of more or less likely TB cases. This considerable heterogeneity of TB groups, in addition to the wide age range of children being evaluated, complicates the comparison and interpretation of serological data in childhood TB tremendously.

Third, many reported studies evaluating in-house Ab detection assays lacked a description of their assays (3, 6, 20, 21, 48, 58). Furthermore, the use of crude mycobacterial antigen mixtures in Ab detection assays by many investigators introduced considerable data variability. In addition, several investigators used the same groups of cases and controls to determine cutoff values and estimate sensitivity and specificity values (30, 31, 47, 74). This approach, although valid in pilot studies, limits the reproducibility of data and is likely to have contributed to the wide variability of reported Ab responses. Also, the majority of studies analyzed and presented their data in mean values of Ab titers despite a large variation in Ab responses that were not normally distributed. As a result, reported values of cases and controls were often driven by a few subjects with high Ab titers, complicating the interpretation of sensitivity and specificity values given. Lastly, studies rarely described the inclusion of immunocompromised children and, if they did, the numbers were as low as 2 to 3 subjects without data described separately (58). Thus, Ab responses in overtly immunocompromised children, such as those infected with HIV, are unknown.

Although some Ab responses in infants and very young children are generally lower than those in older children and adults, several Ab detection assays for the diagnosis of other infectious diseases during childhood exist. Many of these serologic tests are based on detecting disease-specific IgM and/or rising IgG titers for the diagnosis of acute infections, such as rubella, measles, or hepatitis B (810). In infants and neonates, IgM detection utilizing capture ELISAs or immunoblots has proven useful for the diagnosis of measles or congenital toxoplasmosis, respectively (27, 33). In contrast, most serological studies in childhood TB used indirect ELISAs for Ab detection, which might not be the optimal method for all age groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Serological responses to mycobacterial antigens in childhood TB vary widely, with sensitivities and specificities ranging from 14% to 85% and from 86% to 100%, respectively. This wide variability is driven by several factors that have not been properly integrated into the study design and data analysis. Most importantly, the children's age has the strongest impact on Ab responses, regardless of antigen evaluated, and the majority of studies did not categorize their analysis by more-narrow age groups. Other important factors with an impact on accuracy of serodiagnostic tests for childhood TB are the Ab isotype evaluated, the kind of antigen tested, how TB cases are defined, the type of TB case evaluated, and how cutoff values for positive assays are determined. Given all the problems identified with the published studies, the conclusion from this review is that no conclusion can be made at this time about the eventual value of serodiagnosis in childhood TB.

In general, studies demonstrated a stronger humoral immune response to TB in children 5 years and older and those with evidence of definite or more extensive disease, such as culture-positive and/or smear-positive TB. Nevertheless, given the extremely low sensitivity of microbiologic confirmation in pediatric TB, particularly in young children, many Ab detection assays may have a potential adjunctive value in the TB diagnosis of most children. Such value is supported by the generally higher values in specificity estimates in childhood than in adult TB and the existence of sensitive serologic assays for other childhood diseases regardless of age.

In summary, given all the difficulties in diagnosing pediatric TB, serology remains a very attractive diagnostic approach. Future studies with immunodominant mycobacterial antigens in age-defined subgroups are needed to establish the usefulness of serology in diagnosis and move the field forward. Currently, there are no data supporting the necessity that such antigens need to be M. tuberculosis specific, but further studies to assess this are warranted. A critical concern in the design of future serodiagnostic studies is to appreciate and integrate the basic differences in immune responses and pathophysiology of TB between adults and children. Until such studies are done, the potential of serodiagnosis in pediatric TB will remain uncertain.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This work was supported in part by funds to J.M.A. from the National Institutes of Health (NIH)/National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) (AI-067665 and AI-096213) and the Center for AIDS Research (CFAR) at the Albert Einstein College of Medicine (AI-51519).

We thank Racheline G. Habousha, MSLS, director of the D. Samuel Gottesman Library at the Albert Einstein College of Medicine, for her assistance in the electronic literature search.

Biographies

graphic file with name zcd9990946160001.jpg

Jacqueline M. Achkar, M.D., M.S., is a physician scientist and currently an Associate Professor and Attending in the Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, at the Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY. She received her medical diploma and doctoral degree from the Free University of Berlin, Germany, and her master of science degree in clinical research methods from the Albert Einstein College of Medicine. She completed her medical residency and infectious disease fellowship at the New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY, and is board certified in Internal Medicine and Infectious Diseases. Over the past decade, Dr. Achkar has established a successful translational research program in the field of tuberculosis (TB) serology, which includes multiple international collaborations. Her research is focused on the evaluation of humoral immune responses to Mycobacterium tuberculosis and the discovery of biomarkers in patients at various states of infection towards (i) the development of better diagnostic tests for active TB and (ii) the identification of host responses that correlate with TB vaccine effectiveness.

graphic file with name zcd9990946160002.jpg

Anke Ziegenbalg, B.S., is a research associate working with Dr. Achkar in the Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, at the Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY. She received her bachelor of science degree in neuroscience from the University of California – Los Angeles, where she performed undergraduate research on glioblastoma multiforme in the laboratory of Paul Mischel. Her work with Dr. Achkar over the last years has focused on evaluating humoral immune responses to M. tuberculosis in humans, including biomarker discovery and evaluation for diagnostic potential. She will be attending medical school in the fall of 2013.

Footnotes

Published ahead of print 24 October 2012

REFERENCES

  • 1. Abebe F, Holm-Hansen C, Wiker HG, Bjune G. 2007. Progress in serodiagnosis of Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection. Scand. J. Immunol. 66:176–191 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Alde SL, et al. 1989. Evaluation of an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) using an IgG antibody to Mycobacterium tuberculosis antigen 5 in the diagnosis of active tuberculosis in children. Am. Rev. Respir. Dis. 139:748–751 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Araujo Z, et al. 2004. Study of the antibody response against Mycobacterium tuberculosis antigens in Warao Amerindian children in Venezuela. Mem. Inst. Oswaldo Cruz 99:517–524 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Barrera L, et al. 1989. Detection of circulating antibodies to purified protein derivative by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay: its potential for the rapid diagnosis of tuberculosis. Pediatr. Infect. Dis. J. 8:763–767 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Beyazova U, Rota S, Cevheroglu C, Karsligil T. 1995. Humoral immune response in infants after BCG vaccination. Tuber. Lung Dis. 76:248–253 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Bhatia AS, Gupta S, Shende N, Kumar S, Harinath BC. 2005. Serodiagnosis of childhood tuberculosis by ELISA. Indian J. Pediatr. 72:383–387 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Bothamley G, Udani P, Rudd R, Festenstein F, Ivanyi J. 1988. Humoral response to defined epitopes of tubercle bacilli in adult pulmonary and child tuberculosis. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 7:639–645 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. CDC 31 August 2009, posting date Measles (Rubeola). Measles serology. CDC, Atlanta, GA: http://www.cdc.gov/measles/lab-tools/serology.html [Google Scholar]
  • 9. CDC 7 May 2012, posting date Vaccines and immunizations. Hepatitis B. CDC, Atlanta, GA: http://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/pubs/pinkbook/hepb.html [Google Scholar]
  • 10. CDC 7 May 2012, posting date Vaccines and immunizations. Rubella. CDC, Atlanta, GA: http://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/pubs/pinkbook/rubella.html# [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Clavijo E, et al. 2003. Comparison of a dipstick assay for detection of Brucella-specific immunoglobulin M antibodies with other tests for serodiagnosis of human brucellosis. Clin. Diagn. Lab. Immunol. 10:612–615 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Cocito C, Vanlinden F. 1995. Composition and immunoreactivity of the A60 complex and other cell fractions from Mycobacterium bovis BCG. Scand. J. Immunol. 41:179–187 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Cocito C, Vanlinden F. 1986. Preparation and properties of antigen 60 from Mycobacterium bovis BCG. Clin. Exp. Immunol. 66:262–272 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Coetsier C, Baelden MC, Coene M, Cocito C. 1994. Immunological analysis of the components of the antigen complex A60 of Mycobacterium bovis BCG. Clin. Diagn. Lab. Immunol. 1:139–144 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Connell TG, Zar HJ, Nicol MP. 2011. Advances in the diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis in HIV-infected and HIV-uninfected children. J. Infect. Dis. 204(Suppl 4):S1151–S1158 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Cruz AT, Starke JR. 2007. Clinical manifestations of tuberculosis in children. Paediatr. Respir. Rev. 8:107–117 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Cruz AT, Starke JR. 2010. Pediatric tuberculosis. Pediatr. Rev. 31:13–26 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Cuevas LE, et al. 2012. Evaluation of tuberculosis diagnostics in children. 2. Methodological issues for conducting and reporting research evaluations of tuberculosis diagnostics for intrathoracic tuberculosis in children. Consensus from an expert panel. J. Infect. Dis. 205(Suppl 2):S209–S215 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Das P, Horton R. 2010. Tuberculosis—time to accelerate progress. Lancet 375:1755–1757 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Dayal R, et al. 2008. Serological diagnosis of tuberculosis. Indian J. Pediatr. 75:1219–1221 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Dayal R, et al. 2006. Diagnostic value of ELISA serological tests in childhood tuberculosis. J. Trop. Pediatr. 52:433–437 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Delacourt C, et al. 1993. Value of ELISA using antigen 60 for the diagnosis of tuberculosis in children. Chest 104:393–398 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. de Larrea CF, de Waard JH, Giampietro F, Araujo Z. 2006. The secretory immunoglobulin A response to Mycobacterium tuberculosis in a childhood population. Rev. Soc. Bras. Med. Trop. 39:456–461 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Demkow U, et al. 2006. Humoral immune response against mycobacterial antigens in children with tuberculosis. J. Physiol. Pharmacol. 57(Suppl 4):63–73 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Diel R, et al. 2011. Interferon-gamma release assays for the diagnosis of latent Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur. Respir. J. 37:88–99 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Donald PR, Marais BJ, Barry CE. 2010. Age and the epidemiology and pathogenesis of tuberculosis. Lancet 375:1852–1854 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Erdman DD, et al. 1991. Evaluation of monoclonal antibody-based capture enzyme immunoassays for detection of specific antibodies to measles virus. J. Clin. Microbiol. 29:1466–1471 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Graham SM, et al. 2012. Evaluation of tuberculosis diagnostics in children. 1. Proposed clinical case definitions for classification of intrathoracic tuberculosis disease. Consensus from an expert panel. J. Infect. Dis. 205(Suppl 2):S199–S208 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Gupta S, Bhatia R, Datta KK. 1997. Serological diagnosis of childhood tuberculosis by estimation of mycobacterial antigen 60-specific immunoglobulins in the serum. Tuber. Lung Dis. 78:21–27 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Imaz MS, et al. 2001. Evaluation of the diagnostic value of measuring IgG, IgM and IgA antibodies to the recombinant 16-kilodalton antigen of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in childhood tuberculosis. Int. J. Tuberc. Lung Dis. 5:1036–1043 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Kumar G, et al. 2008. Diagnostic potential of Ag85C in comparison to various secretory antigens for childhood tuberculosis. Scand. J. Immunol. 68:177–183 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Laal S, Skieky Y. 2005. Immune-based methods, p 71–83 In Cole ST, Gicquel B, McMurray DN, Eisenach KD, Jacobs WR. (ed), Tuberculosis, 2nd ed ASM Press, Washington, DC [Google Scholar]
  • 33. L'Ollivier C, et al. 2012. Comparison of mother and child antibodies that target high-molecular-mass Toxoplasma gondii antigens by immunoblotting improves neonatal diagnosis of congenital toxoplasmosis. Clin. Vaccine Immunol. 19:1326–1328 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Mandalakas AM, Detjen AK, Hesseling AC, Benedetti A, Menzies D. 2011. Interferon-gamma release assays and childhood tuberculosis: systematic review and meta-analysis. Int. J. Tuberc. Lung Dis. 15:1018–1032 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Marais BJ. 2011. Childhood tuberculosis: epidemiology and natural history of disease. Indian J. Pediatr. 78:321–327 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Marais BJ, et al. 2006. A refined symptom-based approach to diagnose pulmonary tuberculosis in children. Pediatrics 118:e1350–1359 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Marais BJ, Gie RP, Hesseling AH, Beyers N. 2005. Adult-type pulmonary tuberculosis in children 10-14 years of age. Pediatr. Infect. Dis. J. 24:743–744 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Marais BJ, et al. 2006. The spectrum of disease in children treated for tuberculosis in a highly endemic area. Int. J. Tuberc. Lung Dis. 10:732–738 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39. Marais BJ, Hesseling AC, Gie RP, Schaaf HS, Beyers N. 2006. The burden of childhood tuberculosis and the accuracy of community-based surveillance data. Int. J. Tuberc. Lung Dis. 10:259–263 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40. Marais BJ, et al. 2005. The prevalence of symptoms associated with pulmonary tuberculosis in randomly selected children from a high burden community. Arch. Dis. Child. 90:1166–1170 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41. Menzies D, Pai M, Comstock G. 2007. Meta-analysis: new tests for the diagnosis of latent tuberculosis infection: areas of uncertainty and recommendations for research. Ann. Intern. Med. 146:340–354 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42. Nicol MP, et al. 2011. Accuracy of the Xpert MTB/RIF test for the diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis in children admitted to hospital in Cape Town, South Africa: a descriptive study. Lancet Infect. Dis. 11:819–824 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43. Olds GR, Sanson AJ, Daniel TM. 1987. Characterization of Mycobacterium tuberculosis antigen 5 epitopes by using a panel of 19 monoclonal antibodies. J. Clin. Microbiol. 25:471–475 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44. Pan-Hammarstrom Q, Zhao Y, Hammarstrom L. 2007. Class switch recombination: a comparison between mouse and human. Adv. Immunol. 93:1–61 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45. Pilkington C, Costello AM, Rook GA, Stanford JL. 1993. Development of IgG responses to mycobacterial antigens. Arch. Dis. Child. 69:644–649 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46. Ponce C, et al. 2005. Validation of a rapid and reliable test for diagnosis of Chagas' disease by detection of Trypanosoma cruzi-specific antibodies in blood of donors and patients in Central America. J. Clin. Microbiol. 43:5065–5068 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47. Raja A, Ranganathan UD, Bethunaickan R, Dharmalingam V. 2001. Serologic response to a secreted and a cytosolic antigen of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in childhood tuberculosis. Pediatr. Infect. Dis. J. 20:1161–1164 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48. Rosen EU. 1990. The diagnostic value of an enzyme-linked immune sorbent assay using adsorbed mycobacterial sonicates in children. Tubercle 71:127–130 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49. Sada E, Ferguson LE, Daniel TM. 1990. An ELISA for the serodiagnosis of tuberculosis using a 30,000-Da native antigen of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. J. Infect. Dis. 162:928–931 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50. Salazar GE, et al. 2001. Pulmonary tuberculosis in children in a developing country. Pediatrics 108:448–453 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51. Schroeder HW, Jr, et al. 1995. Developmental regulation of the human antibody repertoire. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 764:242–260 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52. Senol G, Ecevit C, Ozturk A. 2009. Humoral immune response against 38- and 16-kDa mycobacterial antigens in childhood tuberculosis. Pediatr. Pulmonol. 44:839–844 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53. Sequeira MD, Imaz MS, Barrera L, Poggio GH, Latini OA. 2000. Diagnosis of tuberculosis in children in provinces of Argentina. Medicina 60:170–178. (In Spanish.) [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54. Siddiqi UR, et al. 2012. Elevated anti-tuberculous glycolipid antibody titres in healthy adults and tuberculosis patients in Thailand. Int. J. Tuberc. Lung Dis. 16:532–538 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55. Siegrist CA. 2007. The challenges of vaccine responses in early life: selected examples. J. Comp. Pathol. 137(Suppl 1):S4–S9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56. Siegrist CA. 2001. Neonatal and early life vaccinology. Vaccine 19:3331–3346 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57. Silva VM, Kanaujia G, Gennaro ML, Menzies D. 2003. Factors associated with humoral response to ESAT-6, 38 kDa and 14 kDa in patients with a spectrum of tuberculosis. Int. J. Tuberc. Lung Dis. 7:478–484 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58. Simonney N, Bourrillon A, Lagrange PH. 2000. Analysis of circulating immune complexes (CICs) in childhood tuberculosis: levels of specific antibodies to glycolipid antigens and relationship with serum antibodies. Int. J. Tuberc. Lung Dis. 4:152–160 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59. Smits HL, et al. 2001. Lateral-flow assay for rapid serodiagnosis of human leptospirosis. Clin. Diagn. Lab. Immunol. 8:166–169 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60. Starke JR. 2012. Interferon-γ release assays for the diagnosis of tuberculosis infection in children. J. Pediatr. 161:581–582 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61. Starke JR, Taylor-Watts KT. 1989. Tuberculosis in the pediatric population of Houston, Texas. Pediatrics 84:28–35 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62. Steingart KR, et al. 2009. Performance of purified antigens for serodiagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis: a meta-analysis. Clin. Vaccine Immunol. 16:260–276 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63. Steingart KR, et al. 2011. Commercial serological tests for the diagnosis of active pulmonary and extrapulmonary tuberculosis: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS Med. 8:e1001062 doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1001062 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64. Steingart KR, et al. 2007. Commercial serological antibody detection tests for the diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis: a systematic review. PLoS Med. 4:e202 doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.0040202 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65. Steingart KR, et al. 2007. A systematic review of commercial serological antibody detection tests for the diagnosis of extrapulmonary tuberculosis. Postgrad. Med. J. 83:705–712 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66. Swaminathan S, Umadevi P, Shantha S, Radhakrishnan A, Datta M. 1999. Sero diagnosis of tuberculosis in children using two ELISA kits. Indian J. Pediatr. 66:837–842 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67. Turneer M, et al. 1994. Determination of humoral immunoglobulins M and G directed against mycobacterial antigen 60 failed to diagnose primary tuberculosis and mycobacterial adenitis in children. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 150:1508–1512 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68. Verma RK, Jain A. 2007. Antibodies to mycobacterial antigens for diagnosis of tuberculosis. FEMS Immunol. Med. Microbiol. 51:453–461 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69. WHO 2010. WHO report 2010. Global tuberculosis control. World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland [Google Scholar]
  • 70. Wright CA, et al. 2009. Fine-needle aspiration biopsy: a first-line diagnostic procedure in paediatric tuberculosis suspects with peripheral lymphadenopathy. Int. J. Tuberc. Lung Dis. 13:1373–1379 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71. Wu XQ, et al. 2010. Humoral immune responses against the Mycobacterium tuberculosis 38-kilodalton, MTB48, and CFP-10/ESAT-6 antigens in tuberculosis. Clin. Vaccine Immunol. 17:372–375 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72. Ygberg S, Nilsson A. 2012. The developing immune system—from foetus to toddler. Acta Paediatr. 101:120–127 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73. Yu X, et al. 2012. Comparative evaluation of profiles of antibodies to mycobacterial capsular polysaccharides in tuberculosis patients and controls stratified by HIV status. Clin. Vaccine Immunol. 19:198–208 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74. Zheng YJ, Wang RH, Lin YZ, Daniel TM. 1994. Clinical evaluation of the diagnostic value of measuring IgG antibody to 3 mycobacterial antigen preparations in the capillary blood of children with tuberculosis and control subjects. Tuber. Lung Dis. 75:366–370 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Clinical and Vaccine Immunology : CVI are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES