Abstract
Catheter-associated infections can cause severe complications and even death. Effective antimicrobial modification of catheters that can prevent device colonization has the potential of preventing clinical infection. We studied in vitro the antimicrobial activities of central venous catheters impregnated with N-acetylcysteine (NAC), an antibiofilm agent, and a broad-spectrum antibiotic against a range of important clinical pathogens. NAC-levofloxacin-impregnated (NACLEV) catheters were also evaluated for their antiadherence activity. NACLEV catheters produced the most active and durable antimicrobial effect against both Gram-positive and Gram-negative isolates and significantly reduced colonization (P < 0.0001) by all tested pathogens compared to control catheters. These in vitro results suggest that this antimicrobial combination can potentially be used to combat catheter colonization and catheter-associated infection.
TEXT
Intravascular catheters are essential in managing critically ill patients. However, vascular catheter-associated infections could result in dire consequences leading to excessive morbidity and mortality, longer hospital stays, and higher health care costs, with an average treatment cost of $25,000 per episode (1–5).
Catheter-associated infections are generally initiated by microbial colonization of the catheter surface and formation of a superficial biofilm layer (6). Cell surface proteins and polysaccharide production by bacterial cells reportedly contribute to the formation of biofilm that can then protect pathogens by impeding both the penetration of antibiotics and the function of phagocytic immune cells, thus hindering the ability to combat colonizing pathogens (7–9).
Impregnation or coating of catheters with antimicrobial agents has commonly been used to prevent bacterial colonization of vascular catheters (8). However, some existing antimicrobial-treated catheters designed to prevent catheter colonization may have partial clinical efficacy, particularly against drug-resistant pathogens, and limited durability of antimicrobial activity (8, 10–13) partly due to their inability to control biofilm formation and combat biofilm-nested microorganisms, which can have MICs of up to 1,000 times higher than their MICs against their free-floating planktonic counterparts (8, 14–16).
N-acetylcysteine (NAC), a commonly used inhalation mucolytic therapy for chronic bronchitis and an FDA-approved intravenous injection for the treatment of acetaminophen toxicity (17), has favorable pharmacokinetics when used in hemodialysis patients (18). NAC also adversely affects bacterial growth and polysaccharide production and disrupts disulfide bonds in mucus, reducing the viscosity of secretions. These properties may contribute to the prevention and disruption of biofilm around different polymeric and metallic surfaces (9, 19–21). Not only does NAC diminish the formation of biofilm by common pathogens (19, 22, 23), it also possesses some in vitro intrinsic antimicrobial activity against both Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria (24). Taking into consideration the therapeutic safety record and the antibiofilm ability of NAC combined with antimicrobial activity of a broad-spectrum antibiotic, impregnation of intravascular catheters with this unique combination can be a promising approach for reducing catheter colonization and potential subsequent catheter-associated infection.
Seven-French, triple-lumen, polyurethane central venous catheter (CVC) segments (Cook Inc., Bloomington, IN) were impregnated with a combination of NAC and levofloxacin, neomycin, or gentamicin by immersion in an agitated solution that comprises 100 mg/ml of NAC and 100 mg/ml of the antibiotic, followed by drying overnight and rinsing to remove any unbound compound (25). Since the size of the zone of inhibition (ZI) generated by antimicrobial-coated devices is reportedly correlated with their in vivo antimicrobial efficacy to prevent colonization (26), we assessed the antimicrobial activity of impregnated catheter segments at baseline and after exposure to human serum over different periods of time against a panel of important clinical isolates. One-centimeter segments of NAC-antibiotic-impregnated and nonimpregnated control catheters were individually placed in human serum at 37°C for 3, 7, 10, 14, and 30 days, with a weekly change of serum. Catheter segments removed from sera and baseline catheter segments (no serum incubation) were assessed for ZI, using a modified Kirby-Bauer diffusion assay (27–29), against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus epidermidis (MRSE), methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA), vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus (VRE), Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Klebsiella pneumoniae, and Escherichia coli. Briefly, bacterial suspensions at 108 CFU/ml were streaked uniformly onto Mueller-Hinton agars using cotton swabs, and 1-cm catheter segments were then half embedded in the center of agar plates, which were then incubated at 37°C overnight. These in vitro experiments were designed to select for further evaluation the most active and durable NAC-antibiotic combination with the broadest spectrum of antimicrobial activity.
Since NAC-levofloxacin-impregnated (NACLEV) catheter segments displayed the most potent (ZI ≥ 15 mm), widest spectrum, and longest durability of antimicrobial activity against tested pathogens, we further evaluated their antiadherence efficacy by culture methods and microscopic observations.
We assessed the anticolonization activity of NACLEV catheters by using a modified Robbins device (MRD) (24) that consists of an acrylic apparatus with an enclosed internal groove that can sequentially accommodate up to 25 1-cm catheter segments. Variations of this device have been described in other studies (30–32). Twenty 1-cm segments of NACLEV or control catheters were sterilely placed in the MRD in sequence. The MRD was then closed, sealed, and connected to a circulating stream of bacterial suspension of MRSE, MRSA (levofloxacin sensitive), MRSA (levofloxacin resistant), VRE, P. aeruginosa, K. pneumoniae, or E. coli at 2 × 105 CFU/ml using a peristaltic pump with a flow rate of 1 ml/min around and through the lumens of each catheter segment for 24 h at 37°C. The system was then flushed with one MRD volume of normal saline. Segments were then removed, individually placed in 1 ml of normal saline, and cultured quantitatively using the standard sonication technique (24, 28). Since the MRD device could only accommodate one bacterial suspension and either the impregnated or nonimpregnated catheter segments, this process was repeated for each organism and for each type of catheter. We specifically tested the activity of NACLEV catheters against levofloxacin-resistant MRSA to evaluate the possible synergetic antimicrobial effect of this combination.
To visualize the antibiofilm and antibacterial effects of the NAC-levofloxacin combination, two 0.5-cm segments of NACLEV or control catheters were individually incubated in a 2 × 105-CFU/ml suspension of a Gram-positive (MRSA) or Gram-negative (K. pneumoniae) representative pathogen at 37°C overnight. Catheter segments were then briefly rinsed with normal saline, fixed in a glutaraldehyde buffer solution, dehydrated, and observed under a JEOL (Peabody, MA) NeoScope JCM-5000 scanning electron microscope (SEM) (33). Samples were coded, and the SEM operator was blinded in regard to the catheter impregnation and treatment. The degree of catheter colonization was assessed comparatively between the impregnated and control segments based on the clusters of organisms and the amount of superficial biofilm observed.
We used Stata software (Stata Corp., College Station, TX) for our statistical analyses. P values of ≤0.05 indicated a statistical significance.
In general, NACLEV catheters displayed larger zones of inhibition against all tested pathogens compared to NAC-neomycin- or NAC-gentamicin-impregnated catheters, both at baseline and after incubation in human serum for different time periods. Representative images of these zones are shown in Fig. 1a to c. NACLEV catheter segments generally produced the largest ZIs against MRSA, a very important pathogen associated with catheter-related infections, compared to NAC-gentamicin- or NAC-neomycin-impregnated catheters at each time period. NAC-gentamicin-impregnated catheters had larger ZIs than NAC/neomycin-impregnated catheters at baseline and at different time periods after exposure to human serum. Nonimpregnated control catheter segments did not produce any zone of inhibition against any organism. The graphical antimicrobial durability of these catheters is depicted in Fig. 2a to f.
Fig 1.
(a to c) Zones of inhibition produced by NAC-antibiotic-impregnated catheter segments after incubation in serum.
Fig 2.
(a to f) Antibacterial activity of NAC-antibiotic-impregnated central venous catheters against common clinical pathogens based on zone of inhibition.
Since NACLEV catheters displayed the most potent and durable antimicrobial activity against all test pathogens, we selected this combination for further evaluation and showed that this combination significantly (P < 0.0001) reduced all bacterial colonization compared to control catheter segments. NACLEV catheter segments exposed to P. aeruginosa were completely sterile, whereas the control segments averaged 1.3 × 106 CFU/segment. More importantly, NACLEV catheters significantly (P < 0.0001) reduced catheter colonization by levofloxacin-resistant MRSA. The mean colony counts extracted from catheter segments are displayed in Fig. 3.
Fig 3.
Anticolonization activity of NAC-levofloxacin-impregnated catheter segments exposed to different bacterial suspensions in MRD. Error bars indicate standard errors of the means (SEM) for bacterial colony counts per centimeter of catheter. An asterisk indicates a significant difference in mean bacterial colony counts (P < 0.0001) between control and NACLEV devices.
SEM images revealed that considerably fewer bacterial cells of MRSA and K. pneumoniae were attached to NACLEV catheters than control catheter segments (Fig. 4a to d). In addition, there were less visible biofilms observed on NACLEV catheter segments versus nonimpregnated control segments when exposed to either organism.
Fig 4.
(a and b) Catheter segment incubated in MRSA. (c and d) Catheter segment incubated in Klebsiella pneumoniae.
Despite many infection control measures and implementation of guidelines, the prevention of infections associated with medical devices, particularly vascular catheters, remains challenging. The undue morbidity, excessive mortality, and rising cost associated with managing catheter-associated bloodstream infections are staggering (34, 35). Patients often spend 10 to 40 additional days in hospitals as a result of acquiring these infections (36–38). However, recently established U.S. Medicare policy changes prohibit reimbursing hospitals and health care facilities for the cost of managing certain health care-acquired complications that are reasonably preventable, including vascular catheter-associated bloodstream infections (39). Furthermore, the Guidelines for the Prevention of Intravascular Catheter-Related Infections issued by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) recommend the use of antimicrobial-impregnated CVCs in patients whose catheters are expected to remain indwelling for more than 5 days if, after successful implementation of a comprehensive strategy to decrease rates of central line-associated bloodstream infection, the rate remains above the goal set by the individual institution (5). A meta-analysis showed that currently available anti-infective CVCs still have an overall colonization rate of about 14% (345/2,491) compared to a rate of 24% (607/2,524) for standard untreated catheters (13). Furthermore, the duration of antimicrobial activity sharply decreases with a catheter's indwelling time. The overall colonization rates of indwelling anti-infective versus standard catheters were 12% versus 24%, 23% versus 28%, and 17% versus 16% for catheters placed for 5 to 12 days, 13 to 20 days, and >20 days, respectively. After 20 days of catheter placement, there is virtually no difference in the colonization rates between antimicrobial-treated and untreated standard catheters (13).
Since pathogenic colonization of a catheter can occur days after its implantation, it would be optimal for antimicrobial-treated catheters to have a sustained activity for as long as it is safe and necessary. However, the activities of many antimicrobial-treated catheters usually diminish rapidly during the first few days of placement in patients due to the rapid and uncontrolled release of the antimicrobial agents into the bloodstream. A measured release can ensure a sustained antimicrobial activity against microorganisms as reflected by the durable zones of inhibition produced by NACLEV catheters after incubation in human serum in vitro. SEM colonization images corroborate the adherence assay findings, indicating that NACLEV catheters substantially reduce bacterial colonization and biofilm formation by both Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria.
NACLEV catheter segments exposed to bacterial suspensions displayed 53-fold (with VRE) to more than 1.2 × 106-fold (with E. coli) fewer average numbers of adherent bacterial cells than control catheter segments and completely impeded adherence of P. aeruginosa bacterial cells. Although levofloxacin alone is clinically effective against a small percentage of clinical cases of MRSA infections, the incorporation of sufficient and safe concentrations of levofloxacin and NAC into catheters may synergistically alleviate this limitation based on the strong in vitro anticolonization activity of NACLEV catheters against levofloxacin-resistant MRSA in the MRD. Since our MRD could accommodate all segments from each comparing group (impregnated or nonimpregnated) at each run, we eliminated the need to perform multiple independent observations, promoting consistency in our results.
These promising in vitro results suggest that NACLEV catheters may protect against catheter colonization, without which catheter-associated infection would not evolve. Although statistically significant, these data may not translate into clinical significance, and therefore, it is important to evaluate these catheters in vivo as well. In light of these favorable results, we have initiated an animal study to evaluate the efficacy of NACLEV catheters against catheter colonization and catheter-associated infection. Future research will also assess the safety of this novel approach.
(This work was presented in part at the 49th Annual Meeting of the Infectious Diseases Society of America [IDSA], Boston, MA, October 2011.)
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
This study was supported by grants from the National Institutes of Health/National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIH/NIAID; grants AI074010 and AI096702).
We thank Don Shult and Tom Loesch for their technical support with the SEM.
Baylor College of Medicine (Houston, TX) is the assignee for patents that describe the method of incorporating agents onto catheters and the use of the combination of NAC and antibiotics. M.D.M. and R.O.D., employees of the mentioned institution, are inventors of one or more of these patents. However, there is no licensing activity regarding these patents at this time.
Footnotes
Published ahead of print 31 October 2012
REFERENCES
- 1. Crnich CJ, Maki DG. 2001. The role of intravascular devices in sepsis. Curr. Infect. Dis. Rep. 3:496–506 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Darouiche R, Raad I, Heard S, Thornby J, Wenker O, Gabrielli A, Berg J, Khardori N, Hanna H, Hachem R, Harris R, Mayhall G. 1999. A comparison of two antimicrobial-impregnated central venous catheters. N. Engl. J. Med. 340:1–8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Kluger DM, Maki DG. 1999. The relative risk of intravascular device related bloodstream infection in adults, p 514 Abstr. 39th Intersci. Conf. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., San Francisco, CA American Society for Microbiology, Washington, DC [Google Scholar]
- 4. Maki D, Mermel M. 1998. Infections due to infusion therapy, p 689–724 In Bennett JV, Brachman PS. (ed), Hospital infections, 4th ed Lippincott-Raven, Philadelphia, PA [Google Scholar]
- 5. O'Grady NP, Alexander M, Burns LA, Dellinger EP, Garland J, Heard SO, Lipsett PA, Masur H, Mermel LA, Pearson ML, Raad II, Randolph A, Rupp ME, Saint S, Healthcare Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee (HICPAC) 2011. Guidelines for the prevention of intravascular catheter-related infections. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA [Google Scholar]
- 6. Maki DG. 1994. Infections caused by intravascular devices used for infusion therapy: pathogenesis, prevention, and management, p 155–212 In Bisno AL, Waldovogel FA. (ed), Infections associated with indwelling medical devices, 2nd ed American Society for Microbiology, Washington, DC [Google Scholar]
- 7. Costerton JW, Montanaro L, Arciola CR. 2005. Biofilm in implant infections: its production and regulation. Int. J. Artif. Organs 28:1062–1068 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Danese PN. 2002. Antibiofilm approaches: prevention of catheter colonization. Chem. Biol. 9:873–880 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Olofsson AC, Hermansson M, Elwing H. 2005. Use of a quartz crystal microbalance to investigate the antiadhesive potential of N-acetyl-l-cysteine. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 71:2705–2712 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Donelli G. 2006. Vascular catheter-related infection and sepsis. Surg. Infect. (Larchmt.) 7(Suppl 2):S25–S27 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Fraenkel D, Rickard C, Thomas P, Faoagali J, George N, Ware R. 2006. A prospective, randomized trial of rifampicin-minocycline-coated and silver-platinum-carbon-impregnated central venous catheters. Crit. Care. Med. 34:668–675 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Hanna H, Bahna P, Reitzel R, Dvorak T, Chaiban G, Hachem R, Raad I. 2006. Comparative in vitro efficacies and antimicrobial durabilities of novel antimicrobial central venous catheters. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 50:3283–3288 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Hockenhull JC, Dwan K, Boland A, Smith G, Bagust A, Dündar Y, Gamble C, McLeod C, Walley T, Dickson R. 2008. The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of central venous catheters treated with anti-infective agents in preventing bloodstream infections: a systematic review and economic evaluation. Health Technol. Assess. 12:1–154 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Agarwal G, Kapil A, Kabra SK, Das BK, Dwivedi SN. 2005. In vitro efficacy of ciprofloxacin and gentamicin against a biofilm of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and its free-living forms. Natl. Med. J. India 18:184–186 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Siegrist HH, Nepa MC, Jacquet A. 1999. Susceptibility to levofloxacin of clinical isolates of bacteria from intensive care and haematology/oncology patients in Switzerland: a multicentre study. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 43(Suppl C):51–54 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Zhanel GG, Karlowsky JA, Rubinstein E, Hoban DJ. 2006. Tigecycline: a novel glycylcycline antibiotic. Expert Rev. Anti Infect. Ther. 4:9–25 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Smilkstein MJ, Bronstein AC, Linden C, Augenstein WL, Kulig KW, Rumack BH. 1991. Acetaminophen overdose: a 48-hour intravenous N-acetylcysteine treatment protocol. Ann. Emerg. Med. 20:1058–1063 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Soldini D, Zwahlen H, Gabutti L, Marzo A, Marone C. 2005. Pharmacokinetics of N-acetylcysteine following repeated intravenous infusion in haemodialysed patients. Eur. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 60:859–864 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Marchese A, Bozzolasco M, Gualco L, Debbia EA, Schito GC, Schito AM. 2003. Effect of fosfomycin alone and in combination with N-acetylcysteine on E. coli biofilms. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 22(Suppl 2):95–100 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Olofsson AC, Hermansson M, Elwing H. 2003. N-acetyl-l-cysteine affects growth, extracellular polysaccharide production, and bacterial biofilm formation on solid surfaces. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 69:4814–4822 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Yuta A, Baraniuk JN. 2005. Therapeutic approaches to mucus hypersecretion. Curr. Allergy Asthma Rep. 5:243–251 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Perez-Giraldo C, Rodriguez-Benito A, Moran FJ, Hurtado C, Blanco MT, Gomez-Garcia AC. 1997. Influence of N-acetylcysteine on the formation of biofilm by Staphylococcus epidermidis. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 39:643–646 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Schwandt LQ, Van Weissenbruch R, Stokroos I, Van der Mei HC, Busscher HG, Albers FW. 2004. Prevention of biofilm formation by dairy products and N-acetylcysteine on voice prostheses in an artificial throat. Acta Otolaryngol. 124:726–731 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Mansouri MD, Darouiche RO. 2007. In vitro antimicrobial activity of N-acetylcysteine against bacteria colonising central venous catheters. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents. 29:474–476 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Mansouri MD, Darouiche RO. July 2003. Method for treating medical devices using glycerol and an antimicrobial agent. US patent 6,589,591
- 26. Bassetti S, Hu J, D'Agostino RB, Sherertz RJ. 2001. Prolonged antimicrobial activity of a catheter containing chlorhexidine-silver sulfadiazine extends protection against catheter infections in vivo. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 45:1535–1538 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Mansouri MD, Boone TB, Darouiche RO. 2009. Comparative assessment of antimicrobial activities of antibiotic-treated penile prostheses. Eur. Urol. 56:1039–1045 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Mansouri MD, Darouiche RO. 2008. In-vitro activity and in-vivo efficacy of catheters impregnated with chloroxylenol and thymol against uropathogens. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 14:190–192 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Sherertz RJ, Forman DM, Solomon DD. 1989. Efficacy of dicloxacillincoated polyurethane catheters in preventing subcutaneous Staphylococcus aureus infection in mice. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 33:1174–1178 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Larsen T, Fiehn NE. 1995. Development of a flow method for susceptibility testing of oral biofilms in vitro. APMIS 103:339–344 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Nickel JC, Wright JB, Ruseska I, Marrie TJ, Whitfield C, Costerton JW. 1985. Antibiotic resistance of Pseudomonas aeruginosa colonizing a urinary catheter in vitro. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. 4:213–218 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Schultz CL, Pezzutti MR, Silor D, White R. 1995. Bacterial adhesion measurements on soft contact lenses using a Modified Vortex Device and a Modified Robbins Device. J. Ind. Microbiol. 15:243–247 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Camargo GM, Pizzolitto AC, Pizzolitto EL. 2005. Biofilm formation on catheters used after cesarean section as observed by scanning electron microscopy. Int. J. Gynaecol. Obstet. 90:148–149 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Raad II, Hanna H, Maki D. 2007. Intravascular catheter-related infections: advances in diagnosis, prevention, and management. Lancet Infect. Dis. 7:645–657 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Richards MJ, Edwards JR, Culver DH, Gaynes RP. 1999. Nosocomial infections in medical intensive care units in the United States. National Nosocomial Infection Surveillance System. Crit. Care Med. 27:887–892 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36. Digiovine B, Chenoweth C, Watts C, Higgins M. 1999. The attributable mortality and costs of primary nosocomial bloodstream infections in the intensive care unit. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 160:976–981 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37. Pittet D, Tarara D, Wenzel RP. 1994. Nosocomial bloodstream infection in critically ill patients. Excess length of stay, extra costs, and attributable mortality. JAMA 271:1598–1601 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38. Safdar N, Fine JP, Maki DG. 2005. Meta-analysis: methods for diagnosing intravascular device-related bloodstream infection. Ann. Intern. Med. 142:451–466 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39. Brown J, Doloresco F, III, Mylotte JM. 2009. “Never events”: not every hospital acquired-infection is preventable. Clin. Infect. Dis. 49:743–746 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]




