Skip to main content
Molecular & Cellular Proteomics : MCP logoLink to Molecular & Cellular Proteomics : MCP
. 2012 Oct 4;12(1):42–54. doi: 10.1074/mcp.M112.019299

Protein N-terminal Acetyltransferases Act as N-terminal Propionyltransferases In Vitro and In Vivo*

Håvard Foyn ‡,§,§§, Petra Van Damme ¶,‖,§§,‡‡, Svein I Støve ‡,§, Nina Glomnes ‡,**, Rune Evjenth , Kris Gevaert ¶,, Thomas Arnesen ‡,§,‡‡
PMCID: PMC3536908  PMID: 23043182

Abstract

N-terminal acetylation (Nt-acetylation) is a highly abundant protein modification in eukaryotes catalyzed by N-terminal acetyltransferases (NATs), which transfer an acetyl group from acetyl coenzyme A to the alpha amino group of a nascent polypeptide. Nt-acetylation has emerged as an important protein modifier, steering protein degradation, protein complex formation and protein localization. Very recently, it was reported that some human proteins could carry a propionyl group at their N-terminus. Here, we investigated the generality of N-terminal propionylation by analyzing its proteome-wide occurrence in yeast and we identified 10 unique in vivo Nt-propionylated N-termini. Furthermore, by performing differential N-terminome analysis of a control yeast strain (yNatA), a yeast NatA deletion strain (yNatAΔ) or a yeast NatA deletion strain expressing human NatA (hNatA), we were able to demonstrate that in vivo Nt-propionylation of several proteins, displaying a NatA type substrate specificity profile, depended on the presence of either yeast or human NatA. Furthermore, in vitro Nt-propionylation assays using synthetic peptides, propionyl coenzyme A, and either purified human NATs or immunoprecipitated human NatA, clearly demonstrated that NATs are Nt-propionyltransferases (NPTs) per se. We here demonstrate for the first time that Nt-propionylation can occur in yeast and thus is an evolutionarily conserved process, and that the NATs are multifunctional enzymes acting as NPTs in vivo and in vitro, in addition to their main role as NATs, and their potential function as lysine acetyltransferases (KATs) and noncatalytic regulators.


Modifications greatly increases a cell's proteome diversity confined by the natural amino acids. As more than 80% of human proteins, more than 70% of plant and fly proteins and more than 60% of yeast proteins are N-terminally acetylated (Nt-acetylated),1 this modification represents one of the most common protein modifications in eukaryotes (15). Recent studies have pointed to distinct functional consequences of Nt-acetylation (6): creating degradation signals recognized by a ubiquitin ligase of a new branch of the N-end rule pathway (7), preventing translocation across the endoplasmic reticulum membrane (8), and mediating protein complex formation (9). Nt-acetylation further appears to be essential for life in higher eukaryotes; for instance, a mutation in the major human N-terminal acetyltransferase (NAT), hNatA, was recently shown to be the cause of Ogden syndrome by which male infants are underdeveloped and die at infancy (10). Unlike lysine acetylation, Nt-acetylation is considered an irreversible process, and further, to mainly occur on the ribosome during protein synthesis (1115). In yeast and humans, three NAT complexes are responsible for the majority of Nt-acetylation; NatA, NatB and NatC, each of which has a defined substrate specificity (16). NatA acetylates Ser-, Ala-, Gly-, Thr-, Val- and Cys- N-termini generated on removal of the initiator methionine (iMet) (1, 1719). NatB and NatC acetylate N-termini in which the iMet is followed by an acidic (2023) or a hydrophobic residue respectively (2426). Naa40p/NatD was shown to acetylate the Ser-starting N-termini of histones H2A and H4 (27, 28). NatE, composed of the catalytic Naa50p (Nat5p) has substrate specificity toward iMet succeeded by a hydrophobic amino acid (29, 30). As largely the same Nt-acetylation patterns are found in yeast and humans, it was believed that the NAT-machineries were conserved in general (31). However, the recently discovered higher eukaryotic specific NAT, Naa60p/NatF, was found to display a partially distinct substrate specificity in part explaining the higher degree of Nt-acetylation in higher versus lower eukaryotes (4).

Human NatA is composed of two main subunits: the catalytic subunit hNaa10p and the auxiliary subunit, hNaa15p that is presumably responsible for anchoring the complex to the ribosome (14, 19). The chaperone-like HYPK protein is also stably associated with the NatA subunits and may be essential for efficient NatA activity (32). In addition, hNaa50p was shown to be physically associated with hNatA, however it is believed not to affect NatA activity (14, 33, 34). hNaa50p was also shown to exhibit Nε-acetyltransferase (KAT) activity (29), however, the structure of hNaa50p with its peptide substrate bound strongly indicates that the peptide binding pocket is specifically suited to accommodate N-terminal peptides, as opposed to lysine residues (35). The human NatA subunits are associated with ribosomes, but interestingly, significant fractions are also nonribosomal (19, 30, 32). Of further notice, the catalytic subunits, hNaa10p and hNaa50p, were also found to partially act independently of the hNatA complex (30, 36).

Recent studies have identified novel in vivo acyl modifications of proteins. Mass spectrometry data of affinity-enriched acetyllysine-containing peptides from HeLa cells showed the presence of propionylated and butyrylated lysines in histone H4 peptides (37). Similar analyses also showed the presence of propionylated lysines in p53, p300 and CREB-binding protein (38) besides the yeast histones H2B, H3 and H4 (39). Propionylated or butyrylated residues differ by only one or two extra methyl moieties as compared with their acetylated counterparts, thereby adding more hydrophobicity and bulkiness to the affected residue. To date, no distinct propionyl- or butyryltransferases responsible for these modifications have been identified. However, by using propionyl coenzyme A (Prop-CoA) or butyryl coenzyme A (But-CoA) as donors in the enzyme reaction, it was shown that some of the previously characterized lysine acetyltransferases (KATs) are able to respectively catalyze propionylation and butyrylation of lysine residues both in vitro (37, 4042) and in vivo (38, 41). Similarly, it has been shown that lysine deacetylases also are capable of catalyzing depropionylation (40, 41, 43, 44) and debutyrylation (44) (see review (45)).

Interestingly, mass spectrometry data also suggested that propionylated N-termini are present in human cell lines (46, 47). Until today, an N-terminal propionyl transferase (NPT) catalyzing N-terminal propionylation (Nt-propionylation) has to our knowledge not been identified.

In this study, we hypothesized that NATs might have the ability to act as NPTs. In vitro experiments using purified hNaa10p, hNaa50p or immunoprecipitated human NatA complex indeed confirmed their intrinsic capacity to catalyze Nt-propionylation toward synthetic peptides. NatA was also found capable of Nt-butyrylation in vitro. By means of N-terminomics, we further investigated the presence of yeast Nt-propionylated proteins in vivo. Indeed, we found evidence for Nt-propionylation being a naturally occurring modification in yeast. Interestingly, in a yeast strain lacking NatA, we observed a loss in Nt-propionylation and Nt-acetylation for several NatA substrates, as compared with a control yeast strain expressing endogenous NatA or a strain ectopically expressing hNatA. Thus, besides acting as NATs, yeast and human NatA can act as NPTs and we thus demonstrate for the first time that NATs have the capacity of both acetylating and propionylating protein N-termini in vivo and in vitro.

EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES

Yeast Strains and Sample Preparation

Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains were made as follows. The haploid MATa strain BY4742 (Y10000, EUROSCARF) was transformed with an empty expression vector pBEVY-URA and used as a control strain termed yNatA. Y10976 (EUROSCARF) with NAA10::kanMX4 was transformed with an empty expression vector pBEVY-URA and used as a strain without yNatA termed yNatAΔ. Y10976 was transformed with an expression vector pBEVY-URA-hNAA15-hNAA10 (1) and used as a strain expressing human NatA, but not yeast NatA termed y[hNatA].

Human Cell Culture

Human A-431 cells (ATCC, CLR-1555) were grown in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium supplemented with 2 mm l-glutamine, 50 mg/ml gentamicin, and 10% newborn calf serum (Lonza Group, Basel, Switzerland). Cells were cultured at 37 °C and in 5% CO2.

Immunoprecipitation of NAT Complexes

An aliquot of 5 × 106 A-431 cells (per sample) were harvested and lysed in 500 μl of lysis buffer (50 mm Tris-HCl (pH 8.0), 50 mm NaCl, 0.5% Nonidet P-40, 5 mm EDTA, 1 mm Pefabloc (Roche)). A total of 50 μl of protein A/G Agarose slurry (Santa Cruz) was added to the lysates and incubated rotating for 1 h at 4 °C. Following centrifugation at 2000 × g for 2 min, supernatants were collected and incubated for another 2 h at 4 °C with 3 μg anti-hNaa15p (anti-NATH in (19)) or custom-made unspecific rabbit IgG (Biogenes). Then, the samples were added 50 μl of Protein A/G Agarose. Following incubation for 16 h, three repetitive rounds of centrifugation and washing (twice in lysis buffer and once in acylation buffer), the samples were used for an in vitro peptide acylation assay.

Plasmid Construction, Protein Expression, and Purification

Plasmids used for expression of fusion proteins MBP-hNaa10p and GST-hNaa50p were pETM-41-hNAA10 and pETM-30-hNAA50, respectively. These plasmids as well as protein expression and purification were previously described (31).

In Vitro Nt-Acyltransferase Assay Using Synthetic Peptides

Purified MBP-hNaa10p (5–300 nm) was mixed with selected oligopeptide substrates (300 μm) and Ac-CoA (100 μm) or Prop-CoA (100 μm) in a total volume of 60 μl in acylation buffer (50 mm Tris-HCl (pH 8.5), 1 mm dithiothreitol, 800 μm EDTA, 10% glycerol). The enzyme concentration was varied for the different substrates so that product formation would be detectable for weak substrates and would not cause product inhibition for strong substrates (48). The samples were incubated at 37 °C for 30 min, following which enzyme activities were quenched by the addition of 5 μl 10% trifluoroacetic acid. For the kinetic data, purified MBP-hNaa10p (5–50 nm) was mixed with a fixed amount of the EEEIA oligopeptide (300 μm) and varied amounts of Ac-CoA (5–150 μm) or Prop-CoA (5–150 μm) in 60 μl acylation buffer. Purified GST-hNaa50p (75–200 nm) was incubated with oligopeptide substrates (300 μm) and Ac-CoA (100 μm) and Prop-CoA (100 μm). The reaction mixture was incubated for 30 min at 37 °C before enzyme activity was quenched with 5 μl of 10% trifluoroacetic acid. For the kinetic data, purified GST-hNaa50p (75–250 nm) was mixed with a fixed amount of the MLGPE oligopeptide (300 μm) and varied amounts of Ac-CoA (5–75 μm) or Prop-CoA (5–75 μm) in 60 μl acylation buffer. The acylation reactions were quantified using RP-HPLC as described previously (49). When making use of immunoprecipitated material as enzyme input, the assay was carried out using 200 μm of oligopeptides and 200 μm of Ac-CoA, Prop-CoA, or But-CoA for 60 min. For kinetic data immunoprecipitated hNatA was incubated with a fixed amount of the SESSS oligopeptide (200 μm) and varied amounts of Ac-CoA, Prop-CoA, or But-CoA(25–150 μm) for 30 min. For time course experiments, the enzymatic reaction was stopped at 10, 30 or 60 min. For the immunoprecipitated material, the concentration of the hNaa10p used in the assays, was determined by SDS-PAGE and Western blotting analysis using anti-hNaa10p followed by quantification and comparison with purified recombinant hNaa10p using Image Gauge V 4.0.

Synthetic Peptide Sequences

Peptides (EEEIAAL, DDDIAAL, SESSSKS, MLGPEGG, MAPLDLD) were custom-made (Biogenes) to a purity of 80–95%. All oligopeptides contain seven unique amino acids at their N-termini, as these are the major determinants influencing Nt-acetylation. The next 17 amino acids are essentially identical to the adrenocortictropic hormone peptide sequence (RWGRPVGRRRRPVRVYP) however, lysines were replaced by arginines to minimize any potential interference because of Nε-acylation.

Proteome Preparation and (Differential) N-terminal COFRADIC Analysis

The yeast proteomes were prepared from 300 ml of culture at OD600 nm ∼3.0 as described (1, 4). After harvesting, cells were washed twice in lysis buffer (50 mm Tris, 12 mm EDTA, 250 mm NaCl, 140 mm Na2HPO4 (pH 7.6)) supplemented with a complete protease inhibitor mixture tablet (1 tablet per 100 ml) (Roche Diagnostics) and glass beads were added before several rounds of vortexing and placing the samples on ice (10x). 1 ml of lysis buffer was used for a pellet resulting from 300 ml of yeast culture. The lysates were centrifuged at 5000 × g for 10 min and the retained supernatants were analyzed by N-terminal COFRADIC analysis (4, 50). Briefly, solid guanidinium hydrochloride was added to a final concentration of 4 m to inactivate proteases and denature all protein. Subsequently, proteins were reduced and alkylated simultaneously, using TCEP (1 mm final concentration (f.c.)) and iodoacetamide (2 mm f.c.) respectively, for 1 h at 30 °C in the dark. Subsequent steps of the N-terminal COFRADIC setups analyzed were performed as described previously (51) using 13C2D3-NHS-acetate and NHS-acetate at the protein level to block all primary protein amines for the comparative and differential analyses respectively. For the comparative analyses the subsequent steps of the N-terminal COFRADIC protocol were performed as described previously (50). For the differential analyses, the proteomes were digested at 37 °C overnight with sequencing-grade, modified trypsin (Promega, Madison, WI, USA) used at an enzyme/substrate ratio of 1/100 (w/w). After overnight tryptic digestion, the resulting peptide mixtures were vacuum-dried. Peptides starting with pyroglutamate were unblocked prior to post-metabolic 18O-labeling and the SCX fractionation step. Here, 25 μl of pGAPase (25 U/ml, TAGZymeTM kit, Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) was activated for 10 min at 37 °C by adding 1 μl of 50 mm EDTA (pH 8.0), 1 μl of 800 mm NaCl, and 11 μl of freshly prepared 50 mm cystamine-HCl. 25 μl of Q-cylase (50 U/ml, TAGzymeTM) was then added to the pGAPase solution. The dried peptides were re-dissolved in 212 μl of buffer containing 16 mm NaCl, 0.5 mm EDTA, 3 mm cystamine, and 50 μm aprotinin. The activated pGAPase and Q-cyclase mixture was added to the peptide sample and the mixture (275 μl total volume) was incubated for 60 min at 37 °C. The samples were further diluted separately to 1 ml in acetonitrile (CH3CN) and ammonium acetate (pH 5.5) to reach a f.c. of 2% CH3CN and 10 mm ammonium acetate. C18 solid-phase extraction (desalting step) of the pyroglutamate unblocked peptide mixtures was performed by loading these peptide mixtures onto an accuBONDII ODS-C18 SPE cartridge (1 ml tube, 100 mg, Agilent Technologies) as described previously (31). Peptides were eluted with 3 ml of 70% acetonitrile and vacuum-dried. For the differential N-terminal COFRADIC setups, post-metabolic 18O-labeling was used. Therefore, the dried peptide mixtures were re-suspended in a trypsin solution dissolved in H216O (yNatA sample) or in H218O (yNatAΔ and hNatA samples) respectively (equivalent of 1 μg of trypsin for each 100 μg of original protein input material). 5 μl of a 200 mm NH4HCO3 stock solution made in H216O or H218O respectively was added per 95 μl of each sample (f.c. of NH4HCO3 is 10 mm) and these samples were incubated overnight at 37 °C. Then, the 16O and the 18O-labeled samples were diluted separately in CH3CN and formic acid (HPLC-grade) to reach a f.c. of 50% CH3CN and 0.16% of formic acid (pH 2.6). Note that these conditions were optimized to avoid trypsin or acid-catalyzed oxygen back-exchange. Equal amounts of peptide material were mixed and N-terminal COFRADIC analysis was performed as described previously (4, 50).

LC-MS/MS analysis using an Ultimate 3000 RSLC nano-LTQ Orbitrap Velos system

Following COFRADIC enrichment of N-terminal peptides, each peptide fraction was re-dissolved in 40 μl of 2% acetonitrile prior to LC-MS/MS analysis. The peptide mixtures were introduced into an Ultimate 3000 RSLC nano LC-MS/MS system (Dionex, Amsterdam, The Netherlands) in-line connected to an LTQ Orbitrap Velos (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Bremen, Germany). A 2.5 μl aliquot of the sample mixture was first loaded on a trapping column (made in-house, 100 μm I.D. × 20 mm length, 5 μm C18 Reprosil-HD beads). After back-flushing from the trapping column, the sample was loaded on a reverse-phase column (made in-house, 75 μm I.D. × 150 mm length, 3 μm C18 Reprosil-HD beads). Peptides were loaded with solvent A (0.1% trifluoroacetic acid in 2% acetonitrile) and were separated with a linear gradient from 2% of solvent A' (0.1% formic acid in 2% acetonitrile) to 50% of solvent B' (0.1% formic acid in 80% acetonitrile) at a flow rate of 300 nl/min followed by a steep increase to 100% of solvent B'.

The Orbitrap Velos mass spectrometer was operated in data dependent mode, automatically switching between MS and MS/MS acquisition for the ten most abundant peaks in a MS spectrum. Full scan MS spectra were acquired in the Orbitrap at a target value of 1E6 with a resolution of 60,000. The ten most intense ions were then isolated for fragmentation in the linear ion trap, with a dynamic exclusion of 20 s. Peptides were fragmented after filling the ion trap at a target value of 1E4 ion counts. When operating the instrument in HCD, spectra were acquired in the Orbitrap with an effective FWHM resolution greater than 7500 around m/z 400. From the MS/MS data in each LC run, Mascot Generic Files were created using the Mascot Distiller software (version 2.3.2.0, Matrix Science, www.matrixscience.com/Distiller.html). While generating these peak lists, grouping of spectra was allowed with maximum intermediate retention time of 30 s and maximum intermediate scan count of 5. Grouping was done with a 0.005 Da precursor tolerance. A peak list was only generated when the MS/MS spectrum contained more than 10 peaks. There was no de-isotoping and the relative signal-to-noise limit was set at 2. The generated MS/MS peak lists were then searched with Mascot using the Mascot Daemon interface (version 2.3, Matrix Science). Searches were performed in the Swiss-Prot database with taxonomy set to yeast (S. cerevisiae) (7776 yeast sequences in UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot database version 2011_09 containing 532,146 sequence entries). For the differential setups; acetylation at lysines, carbamidomethylation of cysteine and methionine oxidation to methionine-sulfoxide were set as fixed modifications and variable modifications were acetylation and propionylation of peptide N-termini and pyroglutamate formation of N-terminal glutamine. For the comparative analyses; 13C2D3-acetylation at lysines, carbamidomethylation of cysteine and methionine oxidation to methionine-sulfoxide were set as fixed modifications and variable modifications were acetylation and 13C2D3-acetylation of peptide N-termini and pyroglutamate formation of N-terminal glutamine. Endoproteinase Arg-C/P (Arg-C specificity with arginine-proline cleavage allowed) was set as enzyme allowing no missed cleavages. The mass tolerance on the precursor ion was set to 10 ppm and on fragment ions to 0.5 Da. The peptide charge was set to 1+, 2+ or 3+ and instrument setting was put on ESI-TRAP. Only peptides that were ranked one and scored above the threshold score, set at 99% confidence, were withheld. The estimated false discovery rate by searching decoy databases was typically found to lie between 2 and 4% on the spectrum level (51).

For the differential setups, all identified peptides were quantified using Mascot Distiller Toolbox version 2.3.2.0 (MatrixScience) in the precursor mode. The quantification configuration in Mascot was set to double 16O versus 18O labeling of C-termini (arginine). The software tries to fit an ideal isotopic distribution on the experimental data based on the peptide average amino acid composition. This is followed by extraction of the XIC signal of both peptide components (light (double 16O) and heavy (double 18O)) from the raw data. Ratios are calculated from the area below the light and heavy isotopic envelope of the corresponding peptide (integration method ‘trapezium’, integration source ‘survey’). To calculate this ratio value, a least squares fit to the component intensities from the different scans in the XIC peak was created. MS scans used for this ratio calculation are situated in the elution peak of the precursor determined by the Distiller software (XIC threshold 0.3, XIC smooth 1, Max XIC width 250). To validate the calculated ratio, the standard error on the least square fit has to be below 0.16 and correlation coefficient of the isotopic envelope should be above 0.97. Quantification of the degree of Nt-acetylation was performed as described in (4). All data management was done by ms-lims (52).

Robust Statistical Analysis of the Measured Peptide Ratios

Following Mascot Distiller quantification and to identify up- or down-regulated proteins in a statistically significant way, the methods of robust statistics were applied to the base-2 logarithms of the calculated ratios of all the identified 16O/18O peptide doublets being set as TRUE. Then, the R software package was used for statistical computing to calculate the probability distributions of log2 transformed peptide ratios. The ratios lying outside a 98% or higher level confidence interval, point to peptides with a statistical significant higher or lower concentration as compared with the control proteome digest and are thus indicated as such (setup 1; median = 1.178 and Huber scale 0.44; setup 2; median = 1.22 and Huber scale 0.46; the ratio means were also used to correct for small variations in initial protein concentrations). Ratios being set as FALSE (including all the singleton identifications) quantification software algorithms typically have difficulties to detect singletons; see also (53)) were all verified by visual inspection.

RESULTS

Human Naa10p and Naa50p are N-terminal Propionyltransferases In Vitro

The studies of Dormeyer et al. and Zhang et al. recently reported the existence of propionylated N-termini in human cells (46, 47). We hypothesized that the existing human Nt-acetylation machinery would also be capable of Nt-propionylation as well as Nt-acetylation and therefore performed in vitro assays using purified hNaa10p and hNaa50p. hNaa10p was challenged with Ac-CoA or Prop-CoA and one of three representative NatA-type substrate peptides. SESSS represents a classical co-translational NatA substrate whereas DDDIA or EEEIA respectively represents the β- or γ-actin N-termini, likely representative of post-translational NatA/hNaa10p targets (30). Determination of product formation was carried out by a previously developed quantitative method based on RP-HPLC peptide separation (49). hNaa10p Nt-propionylated all peptides, but the level of Nt-propionylation was lower than for Nt-acetylation. For the EEEIA-peptide Nt-acetylation was ∼20-fold higher, whereas for the DDDIA-peptide, Nt-acetylation was ∼10-fold higher. hNaa10p was less active toward the SESSS-peptide as compared with the two other peptides, and the level of Nt-acetylation was ∼threefold higher than for Nt-propionylation (Fig. 1A). Kinetic data was produced by varying the Ac-CoA and Prop-CoA concentrations while using a fixed amount of EEEIA-peptide. These results revealed that the kcat was much higher for Ac-CoA than for Prop-CoA, whereas the Km value was in the low μm range for both substrates (Fig. 1B, supplemental Table S1). The large difference in kcat rendered the specificity constant (kcat/Km) ∼fivefold higher for Ac-CoA than for Prop-CoA (supplemental Table S1).

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

NAT- and NPT-activity of recombinant hNaa10p toward synthetic N-terminal peptides. A, Product formation per minute per hNaa10p molecule. Purified MBP-hNaa10p (5–300 nm) was incubated with oligopeptide substrates and saturated levels of Ac-CoA or Prop-CoA in acylation buffer at 37 °C for 10 min. Product formation was determined using RP-HPLC. Experiments were performed in triplicates. B, Ac-CoA- and Prop-CoA saturation curves in the presence of EEEIA oligopeptide (300 μm) and purified MBP-hNaa10p (5 nm with Ac-CoA and 50 nm with Prop-CoA) in acetylation buffer at 37 °C for 30 min. Data were fitted to the Michaelis-Menten equation by Grafit 7 to determine kinetic parameters. Results shown are representative of three independent experiments.

To investigate whether the NPT-activity was shared by other NATs, we also tested hNaa50p. hNaa50p Nt-propionylated both oligopeptides tested, but similar to hNaa10p, the extent was significantly lower compared with the degree of Nt-acetylation. For the MLGPE-substrate peptide, Nt-acetylation was ∼sevenfold more effective, whereas for the MAPL-peptide, Nt-acetylation was ∼25-fold more effective (Fig. 2A). To determine why Nt-acetylation is more efficient as compared with Nt-propionylation, kinetic studies with the MLGPE-peptide were performed. These studies revealed similar Km values in low μm range for both Prop-CoA and Ac-CoA (Fig. 2B, supplemental Table S1). The kcat, however, is almost 10-fold higher for Ac-CoA than for Prop-CoA, rendering the specificity constant ∼20-fold higher (supplemental Table S1).

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2.

NAT- and NPT-activity of recombinant hNaa50p toward synthetic N-terminal peptides. A, Product formation per minute per hNaa50p molecule. Purified GST-hNaa50p (75 nm with Ac-CoA and 200 nm with Prop-CoA) was incubated with oligopeptide substrates and saturated levels of Ac-CoA or Prop-CoA in acylation buffer at 37 °C for 30 min. Product formation was determined using RP-HPLC. Experiments were performed in triplicates. B, Ac-CoA- and Prop-CoA saturation curves in the presence of MLGPE oligopeptide (300 μm) and purified GST-hNaa50p (75 nm with Ac-CoA and 250 nm with Prop-CoA) in acetylation buffer at 37 °C for 30 min. Data were fitted to the Michaelis-Menten equation by Grafit 7 to determine kinetic parameters. Results shown are representative of three independent experiments.

These results demonstrate that both hNaa10p and hNaa50p are NPTs in vitro, and indicate that Nt-propionylation might be a general activity shared among different NATs.

The Human NatA Complex is an Nt-propionyltransferase In Vitro

To determine whether the endogenous hNatA complex possessed an intrinsic NPT-activity, we immunoprecipitated NatA using anti-hNaa15p. This ensured that all the catalytic hNaa10p molecules present in the sample were anchored to the complex. As observed for recombinant hNaa10p, NatA preferred catalyzing Nt-acetylation as compared with Nt-propionylation of the EEEIA- N-terminus. However, and in contrast to purified hNaa10p, for the DDDIA- and SESSS- N-termini, the human NatA complex was equally capable of carrying out Nt-propionylation as compared with Nt-acetylation (Fig. 3A), demonstrating that complexed hNaa10p or NatA is an NPT in vitro. The immunoprecipitated NatA was also challenged with But-CoA, but a decreased butyrylation activity as compared with acetylation and propionylation activity was observed for all N-termini tested. For the DDDIA- and SESSS- N-termini, the transferase activity was approximately halved, indicating that optimal enzymatic activity requires less than three methyl group on the CoA derivative (Fig. 3A). The kinetic data revealed that in contrast to the recombinant enzymes, the Kcat of the three substrates were comparable. However, because of the decreasing Km values with each addition of a methyl group to the substrate, the Kcat/Km values were over twofold and nearly fivefold higher for Prop-CoA and But-CoA respectively, compared with Ac-CoA (Fig. 3B and supplemental Table S1). Nt-propionylation was previously described to occur on 7 human proteins including three of which matched the (non-) canonical NatA acetylation substrate specificity, being β-actin (DD-), chromobox protein homolog 3 (AF-) and cytochrome b-c1 complex subunit 6 (DP-) (46, 47), the latter being a processed protein indicating post-translational rather than co-translational propionylation. All of these point to the in vivo relevance of this observation also for human NatA.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3.

NAT-, NPT- and NBT-activity of immunprecipitated hNatA toward synthetic N-terminal peptides. A, Product formation per minute per hNatA complex. Human A431 cells were harvested, lysed and subjected to immunoprecipitation, using anti-hNaa15p or control antibodies. Beads containing hNatA complexes were incubated with the indicated oligopeptide substrate (200 μm) and Ac-, Prop- or But-CoA (200 μm) in acylation buffer for 60 min at 37 °C. Experiments were performed in triplicates. B, Ac-CoA-, Prop-CoA and But-CoA saturation curves in the presence of SESSS oligopeptide (200 μm) and beads containing hNatA complexes in acetylation buffer at 37 °C for 30 min. Data were fitted to the Michaelis-Menten equation by Grafit 7 to determine kinetic parameters. Results shown are representative of three independent experiments.

N-terminal Propionylation in Yeast and NatA Acting as an In Vivo N-terminal Propionyltransferase

To investigate the evolutionary conservation of Nt-propionylation and elaborate on our in vitro data suggesting that NATs may act as NPTs, we decided to apply N-terminal COFRADIC positional proteomics to a yeast model (54). Briefly, two different proteome preparation strategies for the (comparative or differential) analyses of yeast N-terminomes were applied. First, differential proteome analyses were performed making use of postmetabolic, trypsin-mediated 18O-labeling (55) in conjunction with in vitro N-acetylation using NHS-acetate. As such, except from the in vivo Nt-propionylated N-termini, all N-termini become uniformly modified, enabling the relative quantification of both types of N-termini when comparing the N-terminomes of control yeast (yNatA), versus yeast lacking NatA (yNatAΔ) or yNatA versus yeast expressing human NatA (y[hNatA]) (Fig. 4 and supplemental Fig. S1).

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4.

Outline of the differential N-terminal COFRADIC strategy used to identify NatA mediated in vivo Nt-propionylation. Proteomes from yeast cells were prepared for differential N-terminal peptide analysis. After protein S-alkylation, reduction with tris(2-carboxyethyl)phosphine (TCEP), protein S-alkylation and in vitro acetylation of primary amines, the proteomes are digested with trypsin. Pyroglutamate residues are enzymatically removed by the combined action of glutamyl cyclase and pyrolidone-carboxylic acid peptidase. Subsequently, a differential post-metabolic strategy was applied using trypsin-catalyzed C-terminal oxygen exchange. As such, the proteome digest of one sample was 16O-tagged (yNatA) and the other sample was 18O-tagged (yNatAΔ or hNatA). Equal amounts of these differentially labeled samples were mixed followed by SCX enrichment and N-terminal peptide sorting by means of N-terminal COFRADIC. Sorted fractions were subsequently analyzed by LC-MS/MS analysis. The left and right MS-spectra are representative of spectra belonging to an Nt-acetylated and Nt-propionylated N-terminus of a NatA substrate N-terminus. The Nt-acetylated N-terminus was recovered as an isotopic couple separated by 4 Da whereas the Nt-propionylated counterpart was uniquely identified in the yNatA setup (Single 16O). ‘Ac’ denotes in vivo (black) or in vitro (orange) Nt-acetylation whereas ‘Prop-’ indicates in vivo Nt-propionylation.

In brief, all primary amines are chemically modified by acetylation at the protein level. On tryptic digestion, this creates a pool of two groups of peptides, one group that contains blocked N-termini (either in vitro or in vivo blocked protein N-terminal peptides) and one group that has a newly generated, free N-terminus (internal peptides), which is exposed to amino-reactive reagents in a diagonal chromatography setup following a strong cation exchange (SCX) based enrichment. It is of note in contrast to the second methodology (see below); the applied strategy does not allow to differentiate between in vitro and in vivo acetylated N-termini.

Second, and to assess the NatA-dependence of Nt-acetylation in vivo (i.e. assign NatA substrates) (1), comparatively analyzed protein N-termini and their degrees of acetylation from the isolated N-terminomes of the yNatA and yNatΔ strains. Therefore, all primary amines are chemically modified by 13C2D3- acetylation, before tryptic digestion. This creates a pool of two groups of peptides, one group that contains blocked N-termini (either chemically or in vivo blocked protein N-terminal peptides) and one group that has a newly generated, free N-terminus (internal peptides), which is exposed to amino-reactive reagents in a diagonal chromatography setup following a strong cation exchange (SCX) based enrichment. Further, differentiation between chemically acetylated N-termini and in vivo acetylated N-termini is made possible by the 5 Da spacing between these two types which thereby allows the calculation of the extent of Nt-acetylation (1, 46).

Using the differential strategy, overall, 10 unique N-termini were identified in their in vivo Nt-propionylated form (Table I and supplemental Fig. S2), clearly demonstrating the existence of Nt-propionylation in yeast. A representative example is shown in Fig. 5; both peptide forms show a similar fragmentation pattern, whereas the differential N-terminal modification state is evident from an unchanged y-ion series and mass-shifted b-ions. Because lower mass fragments ions are often missed when fragmenting peptides in ion traps and to confirm the exact localization of the propionyl group at the N-terminus, Higher Energy Collision Dissociation or HCD was applied (56) (Table I). A representative combined HCD/CID spectrum illustrates the additional presence of y1 and the indicative b01 and b02 N-terminal propionyl reporter ions (Fig. 5). Furthermore, we observed a higher spectral count number for the Nt-acetylated peptides compared with only one or two identified spectra of their Nt-propionylated counterparts (Table I). Although not very precise, spectral counts can be used as a rough quantitative measurement (57), and therefore suggest that Nt-propionylation occurs in yeast, albeit at a low frequency under the experimental conditions studied. Interestingly, the identified Nt-propionylated N-termini belong to several classes according to NAT-specificities: NatA (Ser-, Ala- and Gly- N-termini), NatB (Met-Asn- N-terminus) and NatD (Ser-Gly-Gly- of Histone H2A). This indicates that different yeast NATs may act as NPTs in vivo. Further, two of the identified N-termini represents internal, nondatabase annotated N-termini of mitochondrial proteins of which the targeting sequence was lacking, thus pointing to either alternative translation initiation accompanied by co-translational Nt-propionylation or proteolytic cleavage followed by post-translational Nt-propionylation.

Table I. Nt-propionylated N-termini and their Nt-acetylated counterparts identified in yeast. List of the 10 unique Nt-propionylated and corresponding yeast N-termini identified in the two differential proteome setups (i.e. the yNatA versus yNatAδ (setup 1) and the yNatA versus hNatA setup (setup 2)). N-termini 1 to 8 represents database annotated N-termini, whereas N-termini 9 and 10 represent N-termini with an internal protein position. Nt-propionylation for five out of the six NatA type N-termini identified in setup 1 was found to be yNatA dependent (single 16O/single yNatA). In each of the cases identified, ectopic expression of hNatA in yeast, (partially) restored Nt-propionylation. UniProt entry, start, N-terminal modification status, corresponding peptide sequence identified, difference in retention time between the Nt-propionylated and the Nt-acetylated N-termini, NAT type, number of identified spectra (per setup), corrected 16O/18O ratios, statistical significance, highest Mascot ion score (max (score)) and percentage of Nt-acetylation in the control and yNatAδ yeast strains are indicated (N-termini found to be less than 2% or more than 98% Nt-acetylated, were considered as free or fully Nt-acetylated respectively). Whenever corresponding HCD spectra gave further evidence of the residence of an Nt-propionyl group, this is indicated with an asterisk. Whenever the N-terminus was not identified this is indicated with N.I. (not identified), and when the NatA dependency of Nt-acetylation could not be calculated, this is indicated as N.D. (not determined).
Uniprot Start N-term Modified_sequence δ RT (Rtprop-RTAc) NAT type yNatA versus yNatAδ
yNatA versus hNatA
Max (score) %Ac yNatA %Ac yNatAδ NatA substr.
Spectra Corr ratio Significance Spectra Corr ratio Significance
1 RS11A 2 Prop- STELTVQSER 1,7 A 1 Single 16O Single yNatA 1 1,33 45 100% 0%
Ac- 17 1,10 18 0,99 76
2 YGZ2 1 Prop- MNTEGASLSEQLLDAAR 0,9 B 1 0,75 46 100% 100% No
Ac- 26 1,35 24 1,41 145
3 ENO1 2 Prop- AVSKVYAR 4,9 A 4 0,72 47 0% 0% No
Ac- 780 0,93 579 0,88 77
4 FKBP 2 Prop- SEVIEGNVKIDR* 2,1 A 2 Single 16O Single yNatA 3 1,92 68 100% 0%
Ac- 81 1,24 117 1,03 103
5 ALF 2 Prop- GVEQILKR 3 A 2 1,82 1 1,32 60 0% 0% No
Ac- 264 1,21 224 1,15 66
6 H2A1 2 Prop- SGGKGGKAGSAAKASQSR* 0,9 D 6 0,70 2 3,01 99% yNatA 89 100% 100% No
Ac- 17 1,47 35 0,91 116
7 CYPH 2 Prop- SQVYFDVEADGQPIGR* 6,3 A 1 1,59 102 100% 0%
Ac- 60 1,28 104 1,06 144
8 PDC1 2 Prop- SEITLGKYLFER* 1,5 A 1 Single 16O Single yNatA 85 100% 0%
Ac- 112 1,60 85 0,99 102
9 ATPA 37 Prop- STKAQPTEVSSILEER 1 A 1 Single 16O Single yNatA 73 57% 0%
Ac- 4 2,20 98% yNatA 2 2,31 98% yNatA 103
10 ATP11 36 Prop- SSSPEQKYR A 1 Single 16O Single yNatA 47 87% N.I. N.D.
Fig. 5.

Fig. 5.

Propionylation as an in vivo N-terminal modification in yeast. A, Overlay of the two highest scoring MS/MS spectra of the Nt-acetylated (black) and Nt-propionylated (orange) database annotated N-terminus of the FK506-binding protein 1 (S2EVIEGNVKIDR13, Swiss-Prot accession: P20081). The shared y-ions and unique b-ions are indicated in italic and normal type interface respectively. Of note is the observed shift of 14 Da in the b-ion series because of the presence of the N-terminal modification being respectively N-terminal acetylation or N-terminal propionylation. B, Combined CID/HCD MS/MS spectrum of the Nt-propionylated database annotated N-terminus of the FK506-binding protein 1. The CID spectrum was used for identification of the peptide (S2EVIEGNVKIDR13) and is acquired during the acquisition of the HCD spectrum of the same precursor. The newly observed reporter ions indicative of N-terminal propionyation are indicated in bolt type interface. The HCD spectrum was acquired in the Orbitrap with an effective FWHM resolution greater than 7500 around m/z 400.

To address whether the in vivo Nt-propionylation observed in yeast is mediated by the NAT enzymes, we focused on the major NAT, NatA, of which our in vitro data suggested a role as NPT. We prepared and analyzed the N-terminomes of a control strain expressing yeast NatA (yNatA), a strain lacking NatA (yNatAΔ) and a strain lacking yeast NatA while expressing human NatA (y[hNatA]) (supplemental Fig. S1). Eight out of the 10 identified Nt-propionylated N-termini displayed a NatA-type substrate sequence (Ser-, Ala-, Gly-). Importantly, in the yNatA and/or y[hNatA] strain, several of these NatA-type N-termini were identified in their in vivo Nt-propionylated form, whereas this variant remained undetected in the yNatAΔ strain, implying that both yeast and human NatA are acting as both NATs and NPTs in vivo (Fig. 6 and supplemental Fig. S3). In the analysis monitoring the extent of in vivo Nt-acetylation and to further strengthen the NatA-type substrate claim of the Nt-propionylated N-termini identified, the yNatA dependence of Nt-acetylation was determined (Table I). Of the 10 Nt-propionylated N-termini reported; four out of the six Ser-starting and thus NatA type N-termini were shown to be Nt-acetylated in a NatA dependent fashion, all except of one being ≥98% Nt-acetylated in vivo, while being Nt-free in the yNatA delta strain (Table I and Fig. 7). As expected, the prop-MNTEGASLSEQLLDAAR (NatB type) (Fig. 7) and the prop-SGGKGGKAGSAAKASQSR (NatD type histone N-terminus) N-termini were both found to be Nt-acetylated in a NatA independent fashion (i.e. in yNatA and yNatAΔ identified as being ≥98% Nt-acetylated). The two remaining Ala- and Gly-starting N-termini however were never identified in their Nt-acetylated form.

Fig. 6.

Fig. 6.

NatA acts as an in vivo N-terminal propionyltransferase. Illustrative MS-spectra of the Nt-acetylated and Nt-propionylated variants of the database annotated N-terminus of the FK506-binding protein 1, a previously identified NatA substrate (1). These peptides were identified as the Nt-acetylated (upper panels) and Nt-propionylated variants (lower panels) of S2EVIEGNVKIDR13. The ion intensities of the two different N-terminal peptide forms indicate that the Nt-acetylated variant is present in nearly equal ratios (i.e. a ratio of 1.24 and 1.03 in the yNatA versus yNatAΔ setup and yNatA versus hNatA setups respectively). The Nt-propionylated variant however was exclusively identified in its 16O labeled form in the yNatA versus yNatAΔ setup while identified with a ratio of 1.92 in the yNatA versus hNatA setup, indicative for the fact that the in vivo Nt-propionylation of this protein is mediated by yNatA and that ectopically expressed hNatA complex can also act as an Nt-propionyltransferase (NPT) thereby (partially) restoring the degree of Nt-propionylation.

Fig. 7.

Fig. 7.

Deletion of yNatA (yNatAΔ) results in the specific loss of Nt-acetylation of NatA-type yeast substrate N-termini. MS-spectra from the MN- starting N-terminal peptide (doubly charged precursor) of the Ankyrin repeat-containing protein YGL242C (1MNTEGASLSEQLLDAAR17)(upper panels) and of the FK506-binding protein 1 (2SEVIEGNVKIDR13)(lower panels) demonstrate that only the latter represents a genuine yNatA substrate as it was found to be fully (Left) and 0% Nt-acetylated in the control and yNatAΔ yeast proteomes respectively, whereas the NatB-type substrate remained unaffected in its Nt-acetylation status (i.e. fully Nt-acetylated in both yeast setups).

DISCUSSION

As compared with the number of Nt-acetylated N-termini identified in vivo, there are only a few Nt-propionylated N-termini identified. Our data demonstrates that NATs act as NPTs and are responsible for Nt-propionylation in vivo. The NPT-activity of the purified enzymes however, was found to be lower than the NAT-activity toward most N-termini tested. Despite this, our data do not readily explain why there are not more Nt-propionylated N-termini in vivo. When solely relying on the in vitro data, the expected level of Nt-propionylation should be somewhere between 5 to 20% of the level of Nt-acetylation. For the DDDIA- and SESSS-peptide the in vitro NPT- and NAT-activities of the NatA complex were even comparable, raising the question of why we did not identify more Nt-propionylated N-termini. The answer may simply lie in the available Ac-CoA and Prop-CoA pools within a cell. A study aiming at quantifying these compounds in vivo found that in rat liver the concentration of Ac-CoA exceeded the level of Prop-CoA 2-fold (58). In a later study, the level of Prop-CoA was estimated to be 10-fold lower than that of Ac-CoA and further indicated that after 48 h of fasting, the difference between these two compounds had increased to approximately 20-fold (59). The latter observation was further supported in a recent study, which found that in murine hepatocytes the concentration of Ac-CoA was 20-fold higher as compared with Prop-CoA. Together, these studies clearly indicate that in a cellular context, Ac-CoA is more abundant than Prop-CoA and demonstrate the potential dynamicity of these modifications. Thus, even though the NAT-NPT-machinery in the cell is capable of catalyzing both Nt-acetylation and Nt-propionylation, the Ac-CoA/Prop-CoA ratio may greatly determine the modification status of the N-terminal proteome. Interestingly, the in vivo Nt-propionylated proteins identified in the current study and those identified previously (46) comprise a variety of N-terminal sequences. In fact, all the major NAT-classes, NatA, NatB and NatC/E/F are represented. This, and our results defining also hNaa50p/NatE as a potential NPT, clearly suggests that the NATs may at least to some extent act as NPTs in vivo. Interestingly, hNaa10p and hNaa50p were suggested to act as lysine acetyltransferases (KATs) in vitro and to some extent in vivo (29, 60), and also noncatalytical roles of hNaa10p were presented (61, 62). Thus, although the major role of the NATs in vivo may be Nt-acetylation, NATs now emerge as multifunctional enzymes with a potential ability to act as NATs, NPTs and KATs besides acting as noncatalytic modulators. The major functional implications of protein Nt-acetylation are increasingly supported by experimental data. Future investigations will reveal whether Nt-propionylation mediates distinct functional effects as compared with Nt-acetylation, or whether these two modifications are interchangeable in terms of functional output.

In conclusion, Nt-propionylation is a naturally occurring modification in yeast and humans, and the eukaryotic NAT-enzymes have the intrinsic capability to act as combined NATs and NPTs in vivo.

Identified MS/MS spectra are made publicly available in the Proteomics Identifications Database (PRIDE) under the accession code 22438.

Supplementary Material

Figure S1
supp_12_1_42__index.html (1.5KB, html)

Footnotes

* This work was supported by research grants from the Research Council of Norway (Grant 197136 to TA), the Norwegian Cancer Society, the Bergen Research Foundation BFS, Fund for Scientific Research - Flanders (Belgium) (project number G.0440.10), the Concerted Research Actions (project BOF07/GOA/012) from the Ghent University, and the Inter University Attraction Poles (IUAP06). P.V.D. is a Postdoctoral Fellow of the Research Foundation - Flanders (FWO-Vlaanderen).

1 The abbreviations used are:

Nt-acetylation
N-terminal acetylation
Ac-CoA
Acetyl coenzyme A
But-CoA
Butyryl coenzyme A
HCD
Higher Energy Collision Dissociation
iMet
Initiator methionine
KAT
Lysine acetyltransferase
NAA#
N-alpha acetyltransferase # (gene/protein)
NAT
N-terminal acetyltransferase
NBT
N-terminal butyryltransferase
NPT
N-terminal propionyltransferase
Nt-propionylation
N-terminal propionylation
Prop-CoA
Propionyl coenzyme A.

REFERENCES

  • 1. Arnesen T., Van Damme P., Polevoda B., Helsens K., Evjenth R., Colaert N., Varhaug J. E., Vandekerckhove J., Lillehaug J. R., Sherman F., Gevaert K. (2009) Proteomics analyses reveal the evolutionary conservation and divergence of N-terminal acetyltransferases from yeast and humans. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 106, 8157–8162 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Bienvenut W. V., Sumpton D., Martinez A., Lilla S., Espagne C., Meinnel T., Giglione C. (2012) Comparative large scale characterization of plant versus mammal proteins reveals similar and idiosyncratic N-alpha-acetylation features. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 11, M111.015131. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Goetze S., Qeli E., Mosimann C., Staes A., Gerrits B., Roschitzki B., Mohanty S., Niederer E. M., Laczko E., Timmerman E., Lange V., Hafen E., Aebersold R., Vandekerckhove J., Basler K., Ahrens C. H., Gevaert K., Brunner E. (2009) Identification and functional characterization of N-terminally acetylated proteins in Drosophila melanogaster. PLoS Biol. 7, e1000236. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Van Damme P., Hole K., Pimenta-Marques A., Helsens K., Vandekerckhove J., Martinho R. G., Gevaert K., Arnesen T. (2011) NatF contributes to an evolutionary shift in protein N-terminal acetylation and is important for normal chromosome segregation. PLoS Genet. 7, e1002169. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Brown J. L., Roberts W. K. (1976) Evidence that approximately eighty per cent of the soluble proteins from Ehrlich ascites cells are Nalpha-acetylated. J. Biol. Chem. 251, 1009–1014 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Arnesen T. (2011) Towards a Functional Understanding of Protein N-Terminal Acetylation. PLoS Biol. 9, e1001074. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Hwang C. S., Shemorry A., Varshavsky A. (2010) N-terminal acetylation of cellular proteins creates specific degradation signals. Science 327, 973–977 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Forte G. M., Pool M. R., Stirling C. J. (2011) N-terminal acetylation inhibits protein targeting to the endoplasmic reticulum. PLoS Biol. 9, e1001073. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Scott D. C., Monda J. K., Bennett E. J., Harper J. W., Schulman B. A. (2011) N-terminal acetylation acts as an avidity enhancer within an interconnected multiprotein complex. Science 334, 674–678 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Rope A. F., Wang K., Evjenth R., Xing J., Johnston J. J., Swensen J. J., Johnson W. E., Moore B., Huff C. D., Bird L. M., Carey J. C., Opitz J. M., Stevens C. A., Jiang T., Schank C., Fain H. D., Robison R., Dalley B., Chin S., South S. T., Pysher T. J., Jorde L. B., Hakonarson H., Lillehaug J. R., Biesecker L. G., Yandell M., Arnesen T., Lyon G. J. (2011) Using VAAST to identify an X-linked disorder resulting in lethality in male infants due to N-terminal acetyltransferase deficiency. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 89, 28–43 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Strous G. J., van Westreenen H., Bloemendal H. (1973) Synthesis of lens protein in vitro. N-terminal acetylation of alpha-crystallin. Eur. J. Biochem. 38, 79–85 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Strous G. J., Berns A. J., Bloemendal H. (1974) N-terminal acetylation of the nascent chains of alpha-crystallin. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 58, 876–884 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Pestana A., Pitot H. C. (1974) N-terminal acetylation of histone-like nascent peptides on rat liver polyribosomes in vitro. Nature 247, 200–202 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Gautschi M., Just S., Mun A., Ross S., Rücknagel P., Dubaquie Y., Ehrenhofer-Murray A., Rospert S. (2003) The yeast N(alpha)-acetyltransferase NatA is quantitatively anchored to the ribosome and interacts with nascent polypeptides. Mol. Cell. Biol. 23, 7403–7414 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Polevoda B., Brown S., Cardillo T. S., Rigby S., Sherman F. (2008) Yeast N(alpha)-terminal acetyltransferases are associated with ribosomes. J. Cell. Biochem. 103, 492–508 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Starheim K. K., Gevaert K., Arnesen T. (2012) Protein N-terminal acetyltransferases: when the start matters. Trends Biochem. Sci. 37, 152–161 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Mullen J. R., Kayne P. S., Moerschell R. P., Tsunasawa S., Gribskov M., Colavito-Shepanski M., Grunstein M., Sherman F., Sternglanz R. (1989) Identification and characterization of genes and mutants for an N-terminal acetyltransferase from yeast. EMBO J. 8, 2067–2075 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Park E. C., Szostak J. W. (1992) ARD1 and NAT1 proteins form a complex that has N-terminal acetyltransferase activity. EMBO J. 11, 2087–2093 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Arnesen T., Anderson D., Baldersheim C., Lanotte M., Varhaug J. E., Lillehaug J. R. (2005) Identification and characterization of the human ARD1-NATH protein acetyltransferase complex. Biochem. J. 386, 433–443 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Polevoda B., Cardillo T. S., Doyle T. C., Bedi G. S., Sherman F. (2003) Nat3p and Mdm20p are required for function of yeast NatB Nalpha-terminal acetyltransferase and of actin and tropomyosin. J. Biol. Chem. 278, 30686–30697 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Van Damme P., Lasa M., Polevoda B., Gazquez C., Elosegui-Artola A., Kim D. S., De Juan-Pardo E., Demeyer K., Hole K., Larrea E., Timmerman E., Prieto J., Arnesen T., Sherman F., Gevaert K., Aldabe R. (2012) N-terminal acetylome analyses and functional insights of the N-terminal acetyltransferase NatB. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 109, 12449–12454 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Starheim K. K., Arnesen T., Gromyko D., Ryningen A., Varhaug J. E., Lillehaug J. R. (2008) Identification of the human N(alpha)-acetyltransferase complex B (hNatB): a complex important for cell-cycle progression. Biochem. J. 415, 325–331 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Helbig A. O., Rosati S., Pijnappel P. W., van Breukelen B., Timmers M. H., Mohammed S., Slijper M., Heck A. J. (2010) Perturbation of the yeast N-acetyltransferase NatB induces elevation of protein phosphorylation levels. BMC Genomics 11, 685. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Tercero J. C., Riles L. E., Wickner R. B. (1992) Localized mutagenesis and evidence for post-transcriptional regulation of MAK3. A putative N-acetyltransferase required for double-stranded RNA virus propagation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J. Biol. Chem. 267, 20270–20276 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Polevoda B., Sherman F. (2001) NatC Nalpha-terminal acetyltransferase of yeast contains three subunits, Mak3p, Mak10p, and Mak31p. J. Biol. Chem. 276, 20154–20159 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Starheim K. K., Gromyko D., Evjenth R., Ryningen A., Varhaug J. E., Lillehaug J. R., Arnesen T. (2009) Knockdown of Human N -Terminal Acetyltransferase Complex C Leads to p53-Dependent Apoptosis and Aberrant Human Arl8b Localization. Mol. Cell. Biol. 29, 3569–3581 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Song O. K. (2003) An N -Acetyltransferase Responsible for Acetylation of the N-terminal Residues of Histones H4 and H2A. J. Biol. Chem. 278, 38109–38112 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Hole K., Van Damme P., Dalva M., Aksnes H., Glomnes N., Varhaug J. E., Lillehaug J. R., Gevaert K., Arnesen T. (2011) The human N-alpha-acetyltransferase 40 (hNaa40p/hNatD) is conserved from yeast and N-terminally acetylates histones H2A and H4. PLoS ONE 6, e24713. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Evjenth R., Hole K., Karlsen O. A., Ziegler M., Arnesen T., Lillehaug J. R. (2009) Human Naa50p (Nat5/San) displays both protein N - and N -acetyltransferase activity. J. Biol. Chem. 284, 31122–31129 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Van Damme P., Evjenth R., Foyn H., Demeyer K., De Bock P. J., Lillehaug J. R., Vandekerckhove J., Arnesen T., Gevaert K. (2011) Proteome-derived peptide libraries allow detailed analysis of the substrate specificities of N(alpha)-acetyltransferases and point to hNaa10p as the post-translational actin N(alpha)-acetyltransferase. Mol Cell Proteomics 10, M110.004580. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Polevoda B., Arnesen T., Sherman F. (2009) A synopsis of eukaryotic Nα-terminal acetyltransferases: nomenclature, subunits and substrates. BMC Proceedings 3, S2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Arnesen T., Starheim K. K., Van Damme P., Evjenth R., Dinh H., Betts M. J., Ryningen A., Vandekerckhove J., Gevaert K., Anderson D. (2010) The chaperone-like protein HYPK acts together with NatA in cotranslational N-terminal acetylation and prevention of huntingtin aggregation. Mol. Cell. Biol. 30, 1898–1909 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Williams B. C., Garrett-Engele C. M., Li Z., Williams E. V., Rosenman E. D., Goldberg M. L. (2003) Two putative acetyltransferases, san and deco, are required for establishing sister chromatid cohesion in Drosophila. Current Biol. 13, 2025–2036 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Arnesen T., Anderson D., Torsvik J., Halseth H. B., Varhaug J. E., Lillehaug J. R. (2006) Cloning and characterization of hNAT5/hSAN: An evolutionarily conserved component of the NatA protein N-α-acetyltransferase complex. Gene 371, 291–295 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Liszczak G., Arnesen T., Marmorstein R. (2011) Structure of a ternary Naa50p (NAT5/SAN) N-terminal acetyltransferase complex reveals the molecular basis for substrate-specific acetylation. J. Biol. Chem. 286, 37002–37010 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Hou F., Chu C. W., Kong X., Yokomori K., Zou H. (2007) The acetyltransferase activity of San stabilizes the mitotic cohesin at the centromeres in a shugoshin-independent manner. J. Cell Biol. 177, 587–597 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Chen Y., Sprung R., Tang Y., Ball H., Sangras B., Kim S. C., Falck J. R., Peng J., Gu W., Zhao Y. (2007) Lysine propionylation and butyrylation are novel post-translational modifications in histones. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 6, 812–819 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Cheng Z., Tang Y., Chen Y., Kim S., Liu H., Li S. S., Gu W., Zhao Y. (2009) Molecular characterization of propionyllysines in non-histone proteins. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 8, 45–52 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39. Zhang K., Chen Y., Zhang Z., Zhao Y. (2009) Identification and verification of lysine propionylation and butyrylation in yeast core histones using PTMap software. J. Proteome Res. 8, 900–906 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40. Liu B., Lin Y., Darwanto A., Song X., Xu G., Zhang K. (2009) Identification and characterization of propionylation at histone H3 lysine 23 in mammalian cells. J. Biol. Chem. 284, 32288–32295 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41. Garrity J., Gardner J. G., Hawse W., Wolberger C., Escalante-Semerena J. C. (2007) N-lysine propionylation controls the activity of propionyl-CoA synthetase. J. Biol. Chem. 282, 30239–30245 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42. Leemhuis H., Packman L. C., Nightingale K. P., Hollfelder F. (2008) The human histone acetyltransferase P/CAF is a promiscuous histone propionyltransferase. ChemBioChem 9, 499–503 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43. Bheda P., Wang J. T., Escalante-Semerena J. C., Wolberger C. (2011) Structure of Sir2Tm bound to a propionylated peptide. Protein Sci. 20, 131–139 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44. Smith B. C., Denu J. M. (2007) Acetyl-lysine analog peptides as mechanistic probes of protein deacetylases. J. Biol. Chem. 282, 37256–37265 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45. Albaugh B. N., Arnold K. M., Denu J. M. (2011) KAT(ching) metabolism by the tail: insight into the links between lysine acetyltransferases and metabolism. ChemBioChem 12, 290–298 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46. Dormeyer W., Mohammed S., Breukelen B., Krijgsveld J., Heck A. J. (2007) Targeted analysis of protein termini. J. Proteome Res. 6, 4634–4645 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47. Zhang X., Ye J., Hojrup P. (2009) A proteomics approach to study in vivo protein N(alpha)-modifications. J. Proteomics 73, 240–251 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48. Copeland R. A. (2005) Evaluation of enzyme inhibitors in drug discovery. Wiley-Interscience, 34–37 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49. Evjenth R., Hole K., Ziegler M., Lillehaug J. R. (2009) Application of reverse-phase HPLC to quantify oligopeptide acetylation eliminates interference from unspecific acetyl CoA hydrolysis. BMC Proc 3, S5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50. Staes A., Impens F., Van Damme P., Ruttens B., Goethals M., Demol H., Timmerman E., Vandekerckhove J., Gevaert K. (2011) Selecting protein N-terminal peptides by combined fractional diagonal chromatography. Nat. Protoc. 6, 1130–1141 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51. Staes A., Van Damme P., Helsens K., Demol H., Vandekerckhove J., Gevaert K. (2008) Improved recovery of proteome-informative, protein N-terminal peptides by combined fractional diagonal chromatography (COFRADIC). Proteomics 8, 1362–1370 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52. Helsens K., Colaert N., Barsnes H., Muth T., Flikka K., Staes A., Timmerman E., Wortelkamp S., Sickmann A., Vandekerckhove J., Gevaert K., Martens L. (2010) ms_lims, a simple yet powerful open source laboratory information management system for MS-driven proteomics. Proteomics 10, 1261–1264 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53. Impens F., Colaert N., Helsens K., Ghesquière B., Timmerman E., De Bock P. J., Chain B. M., Vandekerckhove J., Gevaert K. (2010) A quantitative proteomics design for systematic identification of protease cleavage events. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 9, 2327–2333 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54. Gevaert K., Goethals M., Martens L., Van Damme J., Staes A., Thomas G. R., Vandekerckhove J. (2003) Exploring proteomes and analyzing protein processing by mass spectrometric identification of sorted N-terminal peptides. Nat. Biotechnol. 21, 566–569 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55. Staes A., Demol H., Van Damme J., Martens L., Vandekerckhove J., Gevaert K. (2004) Global differential non-gel proteomics by quantitative and stable labeling of tryptic peptides with oxygen-18. J. Proteome Res. 3, 786–791 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56. Olsen J. V., Macek B., Lange O., Makarov A., Horning S., Mann M. (2007) Higher-energy C-trap dissociation for peptide modification analysis. Nat. Methods 4, 709–712 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57. Old W. M., Meyer-Arendt K., Aveline-Wolf L., Pierce K. G., Mendoza A., Sevinsky J. R., Resing K. A., Ahn N. G. (2005) Comparison of label-free methods for quantifying human proteins by shotgun proteomics. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 4, 1487–1502 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58. King M. T., Reiss P. D. (1985) Separation and measurement of short-chain coenzyme-A compounds in rat liver by reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography. Anal. Biochem. 146, 173–179 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59. Hosokawa Y., Shimomura Y., Harris R. A., Ozawa T. (1986) Determination of short-chain acyl-coenzyme A esters by high-performance liquid chromatography. Anal. Biochem. 153, 45–49 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60. Lim J. H., Park J. W., Chun Y. S. (2006) Human arrest defective 1 acetylates and activates beta-catenin, promoting lung cancer cell proliferation. Cancer Res. 66, 10677–10682 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61. Lee C. F., Ou D. S., Lee S. B., Chang L. H., Lin R. K., Li Y. S., Upadhyay A. K., Cheng X., Wang Y. C., Hsu H. S., Hsiao M., Wu C. W., Juan L. J. (2010) hNaa10p contributes to tumorigenesis by facilitating DNMT1-mediated tumor suppressor gene silencing. J. Clin. Invest. 120, 2920–2930 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62. Hua K. T., Tan C. T., Johansson G., Lee J. M., Yang P. W., Lu H. Y., Chen C. K., Su J. L., Chen P. B., Wu Y. L., Chi C. C., Kao H. J., Shih H. J., Chen M. W., Chien M. H., Chen P. S., Lee W. J., Cheng T. Y., Rosenberger G., Chai C. Y., Yang C. J., Huang M. S., Lai T. C., Chou T. Y., Hsiao M., Kuo M. L. (2011) N-alpha-acetyltransferase 10 protein suppresses cancer cell metastasis by binding PIX proteins and inhibiting Cdc42/Rac1 activity. Cancer Cell 19, 218–231 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Figure S1
supp_12_1_42__index.html (1.5KB, html)

Articles from Molecular & Cellular Proteomics : MCP are provided here courtesy of American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology

RESOURCES