Abstract
Background
The objective of this investigation was to detect the presence of Trichinella in some carnivores of Mashhad in northeast of Iran and to identify Trichinella species circulating in this area.
Methods
The present study was carried out using muscle tissue collected from 120 stray dogs, 26 wild boars, 25 rodents, two foxes and two hyenas captured in Mashhad City, province of Khorasan Razavi, Iran.
Results
Trichinella larvae were detected in three stray dogs by artificial digestion and compression. All larvae were identified as T. britovi using multiplex PCR.
Conclusion
This is the first report of identification of T. britovi in stray dog in Iran.
Keywords: Trichinella britovi, Epidemiology, Carnivores, Iran
Introduction
Trichinellosis is one of the most important foodborne parasitic zoonoses caused by ingestion of undercooked meat harboring parasites of the genus Trichinella. Infection by Trichinella spp. has been detected in domestic and wild animals throughout the world, with the exception of Antarctica, where there is no record of the parasite (1–3). The genus Trichinella consists of 12 species that all of them are genetically and biologically delineated into two distinct clade characterized by the presence or absence of an intramuscular collagen capsule (4). Human trichinellosis outbreaks occur in many parts of the world, and it has been estimated that as many as 11 million people are infected with this parasite (5). Global distribution of Trichinella in conjunction with varying cultural eating habits, represent the main factor favoring human infections.
In Iran, human cases are rare and there are only two published reports of human infections (6). This is mainly due to Muslim beliefs based on not consuming pork and the meat of some other animal species. Furthermore, Trichinella was first detected in wild boar and later in seven carnivorous mammalian species and a rodent (7). This parasite has been detected in carnivorous mammals of the Caspian region, Isfahan, Ardabil and Khuzestan in the central and west of Iran (6, 7). However, there is no data available on Trichinella infection in the northeast of Iran. Moreover, most of what we know about the prevalence of Trichinella in Iran comes from case report studies. It is presently unclear how many carnivores are infected by this parasite and which species of Trichinella is prevalent in animals of this area.
The objective of this investigation was to detect the presence of Trichinella in some carnivores of Mashhad in northeast of Iran and to identify Trichinella species circulating in this area.
Materials and Methods
Study area
Mashhad is located in northeast of Iran with a human population of 2.5 million. This city is the second largest holy city in the world which attracts more than 20 million tourists and pilgrims annually. This area is located at 36.20° latitude and 59.35° east longitude, in the valley of the Kashaf River near Turkmenistan, between the two mountain ranges of Binalood and Hezar-masjed (Fig. 1). Annual precipitation is about 250 mm per year. Mashhad also has wetter and drier periods with the bulk of the annual precipitation falling between the months of December to May.
Animals and Sampling
Totally 120 stray dogs, 26 wild boars, 25 rodents, two foxes and two hyenas were captured in Mashhad, Khorasan Razavi Province, northeast of Iran during October 2010 to June 2011 with permission from the Iranian Environmental Health Organization. From each animal, more than 10 g of muscular tissue were trimmed of tongue; diaphragm and forearm. The samples were preserved in ice during transportation to the laboratory and examined after sampling as soon as possible.
Direct detection of larvae
Our laboratory research was based on standard artificial digestion techniques according to the standard protocol(8) and compression.
After digestion of muscle tissues, the sediment was allowed to settle and was washed several times. The sediment from the last washing was examined for larvae under a dissection microscope. When the sediment contained Trichinella larvae, the procedure was repeated using the individual samples.
Experimental infection of rat
As a confirmatory study, two rats were orally inoculated by administering 1 ml of 0.9% saline solution containing 300 Trichinella larvae by gavage. Trichinella larvae were detected in the muscular tissues after 45 days post infection using compression between 2 slides and artificial digestion.
Histopathological examination
Portions of the tongue, diaphragm and forearm muscles of positive samples were fixed in 10% phosphate-buffered formalin, embedded in low-fusion paraffin, cut in 4-mm-thick sections and finally stained with hematoxylin–eosin and examined under a light microscope.
Molecular identification of Trichinella spp
Trichinella spp. larvae recovered by artificial tissue digestion from positive stray dogs were washed in saline, preserved in 90% ethyl alcohol, and submitted to the International Trichinella Reference Center (ITRC, www.iss.it/site/Trichinella) in Rome, Italy for genotyping. Individual Trichinella spp. larvae were identified by multiplex PCR analysis following the protocol described by Pozio and La Rosa (9). Briefly, DNA was extracted from ten individual worms of each samples; PCR was performed using ExTaq DNA polymerase (Takara) in 50 ml containing 1.5 mM MgCl2, 200 mM dNTPs, and 50 pmol of primer pairs I, II, III, IV and V (Table 1) and 0.5 unit of ExTaq DNA polymerase. The PCR-amplified fragments from purified DNA were visualized by agarose gel electrophoresis (2.0% standard agarose). Single Trichinella spp. larvae from one reference strain for each taxa, were used for comparison: T. spiralis, T. nativa, T. pseudospiralis, T. britovi and T. nelsoni.
Table 1.
Primer pairs | Location in DNA | Sequence |
---|---|---|
I | ESV | 5’-GTT.CCA.TGT.GAA.CAG.CAG.T-3’ |
5’-CGA.AAA.CAT.ACG.ACA.ACT.GC-3’ | ||
II | ITS1 | 5’-GCT.ACA.TCC.TTT.TGA.TCT.GTT-3’ |
5’-AGA.CAC.AAT.ATC.AAC.CAC.AGT.ACA-3’ | ||
III | ITS1 | 5’-GCG.GAA.GGA.TCA.TTA.TCG.TGT.A-3’ |
5’-TGG.ATT.ACA.AAG.AAA.ACC.ATC.ACT-3’ | ||
IV | ITS2 | 5’-GTG.AGC.GTA.ATA.AAG.GTG.CAG-3’ |
5’-TTC.ATC.ACA.CAT.CTT.CCA.CTA-3’ | ||
V | ITS2 | 5’-CAA.TTG.AAA.ACC.GCT.TAG.CGT.GTT.T-3’ |
5’-TGA.TCT.GAG.GTC.GAC.ATT.TCC-3’ |
Results
In none of the 26 wild boars, 25 rodents, two foxes and two hyenas Trichinella larvae were found using artificial digestion and compression but, Trichinella larvae were found in three of 120 stray dogs (Fig. 2, 3). Ten larvae were recovered after pooled sample digestion. Trichinella larvae were visible inside thick collagen capsules by direct microscopic examination of muscle tissue (Fig. 3). Moreover, Trichinella larvae were detected after 45 days post experimental infection in two rats using compression and artificial digestion.
In the histopathological examination of the muscles of three stray dogs, encapsulated Trichinella larvae were observed (Fig. 4).
Banding patterns from multiplex PCR amplifications of the Trichinella isolates showed that all of positive stay dogs were infected with T. britovi (Fig. 5).
Discussion
Our results demonstrated for the first time the infection of stray dogs with T. britovi in Iran. Presence of T. britovi was formerly reported in two previous studies (7, 9) i.e. a leopard (Panthera pardus saxicolor) and also in a wild boar in north and west of Iran, respectively. In only one previous study (10), based on morphological characteristics, T. spiralis is reported in Iran.
According to religious believes, consumption of pork and wild boar meat in Iran is forbidden, therefore, epidemiology of Trichinella has rarely been investigated. These results indicate that Trichinella spp. infection has been documented in jackals, red foxes, stray dogs, brown bears, wild cats, wild boars, stripped hyena and in one rodent (Meriones persicus) of the north and central region of Iran (11, 12). Recently, T. murrelli has been reported in a wild boar (13), but further work indicated that incorrect sequencing of Trichinella has lead to misidentification and it was T. britovi (9). It should be noted that T. murrelli circulates in North America and it has only been detected once outside of this continent, in particular, in a horse slaughtered in France which was imported from USA (9). No information is available on Trichinella spp. infection in domestic animals of Iran. Moreover, a doubtful case of human infection was reported based on clinical symptoms, history of eating undercooked wild boar meat, as well as presence of low titer circulating antibody in the serum of the patient (14). Recently, by using molecular methods, a case of trichinellosis in a family was confirmed in Tehran with a history of consumption wild boar meat infected with T. britovi (6). In addition, human infections caused by T. britovi due to consumption of free-ranging pigs, game and horse meat, have been documented in France, Italy, Spain and Turkey (15, 16). Since females of T. britovi produce fewer number of newborn larvae than T. spiralis, the clinical course is benign and death has not been documented (1). In general, our results reflects what we believe to be T. britovi the most prevalent species in Iran, but T. spiralis, if still present, is probably restricted to a small area. Indeed, T. britovi is highly adapted to carnivores and T. spiralis to swine (17). It is better to know that the Russian authors named as T. nelsoni all the Trichinella taxa which today are identified as T. britovi, T. nelsoni and Trichinella T8. Isolates of T. nelsoni are present only in eastern and southern Africa (from Kenya to South Africa).
Conclusion
Due to social, economic and religious factors in Iran, the risk of trichinellosis infection among humans is low but sporadic cases still exists among people that consume wild boar meat in some areas.
Acknowledgments
Thanks to Dr Fallah Rad for helpful revision that improved this work. This research was financially supported by a grant from Ferdowsi University of Mashhad. We thank Mr. Eshrati H., Azari G.A. and Mohamadnejad for their technical assistance during data collection. The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.
References
- 1.Pozio E. World distribution of Trichinella spp. infections in animals and humans. Vet Parasitol. 2007;149:3–21. doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2007.07.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Pozio E, Pagani P, Marucci G, Zarlenga DS, Hoberg EP, De Meneghi D, La Rosa G, Rossi L. Trichinella britovi etiological agent of sylvatic trichinellosis in the republic of guinea and a re-evaluation of geographical distribution for encapsulated species in Africa. Int J Parasitol. 2005;35:955–960. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpara.2005.03.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Pozio E, Murrell KD. Systematic and epidemiology of Trichinella . Adv Parasitol. 2006;63:367–439. doi: 10.1016/S0065-308X(06)63005-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Gottstein B, Pozio E, Nockler K. Epidemiology, diagnosis, treatment, and control of trichinellosis. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2009;22:127–145. doi: 10.1128/CMR.00026-08. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Wang ZQ, Cui J, Xu BL. The epidemiology of human trichinellosis in china during 2000-2003. Acta Trop. 2006;97:247–251. doi: 10.1016/j.actatropica.2005.03.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Mahdavi M. Trichinellosis in Iran. Iranian J Publ Health. 2009;38:131–133. [Google Scholar]
- 7.Mowlavi G, Marucci G, Mobedi I, Zahabiioon F, Mirjalali H, Pozio E. Trichinella britovi in a leopard (panthera pardus saxicolor) in Iran. Vet Parasitol. 2009;164:350–352. doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2009.05.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.NÖckler K, Kapel CMO. Detection and surveillance for Trichinella: Meat inspection and hygiene, and legislation; paris: World Organisation for Animal Health; 2007. [Google Scholar]
- 9.Marucci G, La Rosa G, Pozio E. Incorrect sequencing and taxon misidentification: An example in the Trichinella genus. J Helminthol. 2010;84:336–339. doi: 10.1017/S0022149X10000131. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Shaikenov BS, Boev SN. Distribution of Trichinella species in the old world. Wiad. Parazytol. 1983;29:595–608. [Google Scholar]
- 11.Hamidi AN. Trichinosis among the animals in north eastern Iran. Bull Soc Pathol Exot Filiales. 1979;72:254–257. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Sadighian A, Arfaa F, Movafagh K. Trichinella spiralis in carnivores and rodents in Isfahan, Iran. J Parasitol. 1973;59:986. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Kia EB, Meamar AR, Zahabiun F, Mirhendi H. The first occurrence of Trichinella murrelli in wild boar in Iran and a review of Iranian trichinellosis. J Helminthol. 2009;83:399–402. doi: 10.1017/S0022149X09990319. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Mobedi I, Arfaa F, Madadi H, Movafagh K. Sylvatic focus of trichinosis in the Caspian region, northern Iran. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1973;22:720–722. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.1973.22.720. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Pozio E, La Rosa G, Gomez Morales MA. Epidemiology of human and animal trichinellosis in Italy since its discovery in 1887. Parasite. 2001;8:S106–108. doi: 10.1051/parasite/200108s2106. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Rodriguez de las Parras E, Rodriguez-Ferrer M, Nieto-Martinez J, Ubeira FM, Garate-Ormaechea T. [trichinellosis outbreaks in Spain (1990-2001)] Enferm Infec Microbiol Clin. 2004;22:70–76. doi: 10.1157/13056885. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Pozio E, Rinaldi L, Marucci G, Musella V, Galati F, Cringoli G, Boireau P, La Rosa G. Hosts and habitats of Trichinella spiralis and Trichinella britovi in Europe. Int J Parasitol. 2009;39:71–79. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpara.2008.06.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]