Skip to main content
BMC Genomics logoLink to BMC Genomics
. 2012 Jun 22;13:275. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-13-275

Visualizing spatiotemporal dynamics of apoptosis after G1 arrest by human T cell leukemia virus type 1 Tax and insights into gene expression changes using microarray-based gene expression analysis

Mariluz Arainga 1,2, Hironobu Murakami 1,3, Yoko Aida 1,2,
PMCID: PMC3537563  PMID: 22726420

Abstract

Background

Human T cell leukemia virus type 1 (HTLV-1) Tax is a potent activator of viral and cellular gene expression that interacts with a number of cellular proteins. Many reports show that Tax is capable of regulating cell cycle progression and apoptosis both positively and negatively. However, it still remains to understand why the Tax oncoprotein induces cell cycle arrest and apoptosis, or whether Tax-induced apoptosis is dependent upon its ability to induce G1 arrest. The present study used time-lapse imaging to explore the spatiotemporal patterns of cell cycle dynamics in Tax-expressing HeLa cells containing the fluorescent ubiquitination-based cell cycle indicator, Fucci2. A large-scale host cell gene profiling approach was also used to identify the genes involved in Tax-mediated cell signaling events related to cellular proliferation and apoptosis.

Results

Tax-expressing apoptotic cells showed a rounded morphology and detached from the culture dish after cell cycle arrest at the G1 phase. Thus, it appears that Tax induces apoptosis through pathways identical to those involved in G1 arrest. To elucidate the mechanism(s) by which Tax induces cell cycle arrest and apoptosis, regulation of host cellular genes by Tax was analyzed using a microarray containing approximately 18,400 human mRNA transcripts. Seventeen genes related to cell cycle regulation were identified as being up or downregulated > 2.0-fold in Tax-expressing cells. Several genes, including SMAD3, JUN, GADD45B, DUSP1 and IL8, were involved in cellular proliferation, responses to cellular stress and DNA damage, or inflammation and immune responses. Additionally, 23 pro- and anti-apoptotic genes were deregulated by Tax, including TNFAIP3, TNFRS9, BIRC3 and IL6. Furthermore, the kinetics of IL8, SMAD3, CDKN1A, GADD45A, GADD45B and IL6 expression were altered following the induction of Tax, and correlated closely with the morphological changes observed by time-lapse imaging.

Conclusions

Taken together, the results of this study permit a greater understanding of the biological events affected by HTLV-1 Tax, particularly the regulation of cellular proliferation and apoptosis. Importantly, this study is the first to demonstrate the dynamics of morphological changes during Tax-induced apoptosis after cell cycle arrest at the G1 phase.

Background

Human T cell leukemia virus type 1 (HTLV-1) causes adult T cell leukemia (ATL), a severe and fatal lymphoproliferative disease of helper T cells [1], and a separate neurodegenerative disease called tropical spastic paraparesis/HTLV-1-associated myelopathy (TSP/HAM) [2]. HTLV-1 encodes a 40 kDa regulatory protein, Tax, which is necessary and sufficient for cellular transformation and is, therefore, considered to be the viral oncoprotein. Tax is a potent activator of both viral and cellular gene expression, and the oncogenic potential of Tax is thought to depend on its ability to alter the expression of cellular genes involved in cell growth and proliferation, and its direct interactions with cell cycle regulators [3,4]. Tax-mediated transcriptional activation of cellular gene expression requires direct contact with components of the cyclic AMP-response element binding protein (CREB), nuclear factor-κB (NF-κB), and the serum response factor (SRF) signaling pathways [5]. Moreover, Tax is thought to be involved in other cellular processes including DNA repair, cell cycle progression, and apoptosis [6,7].

Tax stimulates cell growth via cell cycle dysregulation [3,4,7]. A major mitogenic activity of Tax is stimulation of the G1-to-S-phase transition [8-12], and several different mechanisms have been proposed to explain the dysregulation of the G1 phase and the accelerated progression into S phase. In mammalian cells, G1 progression is controlled by the sequential activation of the cyclin-dependent kinases (Cdks) Cdk4, Cdk6, and Cdk2. Activation of these Cdks by Tax leads to hyperphosphorylation of Retinoblastoma (Rb) and the liberation of E2F, which is essential for cell cycle progression [12,13]. Tax interacts with cyclins D1, D2, and D3, but not with Cdk1 or Cdk2 [11,14-16]. By binding to cyclins, Tax stabilizes the cyclin D/Cdk complex, thereby enhancing its kinase activity and leading to the hyperphosphorylation of Rb. Moreover, Tax activates the transcription of cyclin D1 and D2 [17,18] by deregulating the NF-κB pathway [18,19]. By contrast, there is evidence that Tax induces cell cycle arrest at the G1 phase [20]. HTLV-1 infection and Tax expression in human cells have been observed to induce cell cycle arrest at the G1 phase by inducing p27/kip1 and p21/waf1 [20], and the sharp rise in p27 induced by Tax is often associated with premature activation of the anaphase-promoting complex (APC) [21]. Indeed, cells infected with HTLV-1 expressing wild-type Tax arrest at the G1/S boundary when subjected to cellular stress [22,23].

Interestingly, Tax induces apoptosis in a variety of systems [24-26], consistent with its ability to inhibit DNA repair. Indeed, HTLV-1-infected cells undergo increased apoptosis upon cellular stress [22-28]; however, other reports show that Tax inhibits apoptosis [29-31], supporting its role as a transforming protein and an inducer of T cell proliferation. Therefore, it seems likely that Tax is capable of stimulating both pro- and anti-apoptotic pathways.

Tax regulates cell cycle progression and apoptosis both positively and negatively; however, the molecular mechanism(s) underlying the regulation of these processes by Tax remain obscure. In this study, we examined the regulation of cell cycle progression and apoptosis by Tax and demonstrated the following: (i) a high level of transient Tax expression arrests the cell cycle at the G1 phase and induces apoptosis in HeLa cells; (ii) based on a microarray containing approximately 18,400 human mRNA transcripts, genes related to cell cycle progression and apoptosis were deregulated by Tax in HeLa cells; (iii) time-lapse imaging of a fluorescent ubiquitination-based cell cycle indicator (Fucci2) in HeLa cells allows for dual-color imaging and can be used to distinguish between live cells in the G1 and S/G2/M phases. Using this system for the in vivo analysis of the spatial and temporal patterns of cell cycle dynamics [32,33], we demonstrated that Tax-expressing cells arrest in the G1 phase of the cell cycle and proceeded to apoptosis; and (iv) we found that Tax-induced changes in the expression of genes related to cell cycle regulation and apoptosis correlated well with the morphological changes observed in the cells.

Results

Tax induces cell cycle arrest and apoptosis in transfected HeLa cells

To examine whether Tax induces cell cycle arrest at the G1 phase and promotes apoptosis in HeLa cells, chimeric Tax carrying a Flag tag at the carboxyl terminus was transfected into HeLa cells. At 24 h post transfection, the expression of Tax protein was assessed by immunoblot analysis of cell extracts using the monoclonal antibody (MAb) M2, which recognizes the Flag tag (Figure 1A). A single band with an apparent molecular mass consistent with the predicted sequences was observed. As shown in Figure 1B, Tax was detected in both the nucleus and cytoplasm of transfected HeLa cells. This result correlates well with previous studies indicating that Tax is able to shuttle between the nucleus and the cytoplasm but predominantly localizes in the nucleus [34]. As shown in Figure 1C, Tax showed considerable transactivation activity toward the HTLV-1 enhancer, indicating that chimeric Tax with a C-terminal Flag tag was fully functional.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Tax induces G1cell cycle arrest and apoptosis. HeLa cells were transiently transfected with a pCAGGS-Tax Flag-tagged vector or the control pCAGGS vector (A, B and E) together with either the reporter plasmid pGV-HL21 (HTLV-1 enhancer) and the reference plasmid pRL-SV40 (C), or the GFP expression vector pEGFP-NI (D and G) or the pSV-β-galactosidase vector (F). (A) At 24 h post-transfection, cells were lysed and subjected to immunoblot analysis with an anti-Flag MAb and an anti-actin MAb (as a control). (B) At 24 h post-transfection, cells were fixed, permeabilized, and immunostained with an anti-Flag MAb followed by an Alexa 488-conjugated anti-mouse IgG antibody. Cells were analyzed by confocal laser scanning microscopy (Olympus FV1000). (C) At 48 h after transfection, cells were recovered and the activities of firefly and Renilla luciferases were measured in lysates. For each sample, the firefly luciferase activity (pGV-HL21) was normalized by reference to Renilla luciferase activity (pRL-SV40). (D) At 48 h post-transfection, cells were fixed and stained with propidium iodide for the analysis of DNA content. GFP-positive cells were analyzed by flow cytometry using Cell Quest for acquisition and ModFit LT. The peaks of the cells at G1 and G2/M phase are indicated. (E) At 48 h post-transfection, cells were collected, lysed, and analyzed for phosphorylation of Rb by immunoblotting with an anti-Rb MAb using an anti-actin MAb as a control. ppRb, hyperphosphorylated forms of Rb; pRb, hypo- and unphosphorylated forms of Rb. (F) At 48 h post-transfection, cells were collected, lysed, β-galactosidase activity was measured. Caspase-3 activity was measured in the cell lysates with an equal amount of β-galactosidase activity. Each of the columns and its associated error bar represent the mean ± standard deviation (SD) of results from four different experiments. The asterisk (*) represents a p-value of < 0.01. (G) At 48 h post-transfection, cells were stained with PE-Annexin V and 7-AAD to identify apoptotic cells. GFP was used as a reporter to discriminate between transfected and untransfected cells. The percentage of Annexin V-positive and 7-AAD-negative cells relative to GFP-positive cells indicates the level of apoptosis.

Next, the cell cycle distribution of Tax-expressing HeLa cells was analyzed. Cells were stained with propidium iodide (PI) and analyzed by flow cytometry 48 h after co-transfection with the Tax expression vector or the control vector and a green fluorescence protein (GFP) expression vector, pEGFP-N1, which served as a marker plasmid. The histograms show representative data from one of three independent experiments. As shown in Figure 1D, flow cytometry analysis revealed that there was a marked increase in the percentage of cells in the G1 phase in cells transfected with Tax (approximately 92% ± 4.5%) compared with cells transfected with the control vector (approximately 58% ± 4.3%), strongly indicating that G1 cell cycle arrest was induced in Tax-expressing cells (p < 0.001). To confirm this result, total cell extracts were collected 48 h post-transfection and the phosphorylation status of Rb was determined by immunoblotting with an anti-Rb MAb, which detects all forms of Rb. The phosphorylation status of Rb serves as a marker of cells in the G0/G1 phase of the cell cycle, since Rb is progressively phosphorylated throughout the G1 phase and is hyperphosphorylated upon transition into the S phase [35]. As shown in Figure 1E, hyperphosphorylated form (ppRb) migrated more slowly than the hypo- and unphosphorylated forms (pRb). The majority of Rb was hyperphosphorylated (upper major band) in cells transfected with the control vector; however, a decrease in the level of hyperphosphorylated form (ppRb) and an increase in the levels of hypo- and/or unphosphorylated form (pRb) were observed in extracts prepared from Tax-expressing cells. These results confirmed that Tax prevents hyperphosphorylation of Rb and blocks cell cycle progression at the G1 phase.

To analyze whether Tax induced apoptosis, HeLa cells were transfected with a Tax expression vector or a control vector, and the activity of caspase-3, which plays an essential role in apoptosis, was measured. Caspase-3 activity was significantly higher in Tax-expressing cells than in control cells (Figure 1F; p < 0.01). Next, the apoptotic activity of Tax was further quantified using flow cytometry by co-staining transfected cells with phycoerythrin (PE)-Annexin V and 7-amino-actinomycin D (7-AAD) (Figure 1G). A prominent event in early apoptosis is the exposure of phosphatidylserine (PS) on the outer leaflet of the cell membrane. Cell surface-exposed PS is specifically detected by PE-Annexin V, and during the late stages of apoptosis or necrosis, cell membrane integrity is lost, allowing entry of the DNA-binding dye 7-AAD. The population of Annexin V-positive and 7-AAD-negative apoptotic cells was much higher in Tax-expressing cells (19.9%) than in cells transfected with the control vector (3.5%). Because the same trends were observed for caspase-3 activity (Figure 1F) and apoptotic activity (Figure 1G), it was concluded that Tax induces apoptosis in HeLa cells.

Large-scale expression profiling of cellular genes after transfection with tax

To analyze the mechanism(s) underlying the regulation of cell cycle progression and apoptosis by Tax, total RNA was isolated from HeLa cells transfected with Tax or a control vector, and each RNA sample was subjected to microarray analysis (GEO accession number GSE34750). Data sets were analyzed using GeneSpring GX 11.0 software for gene expression, clustering, gene ontology, and significant signaling pathways. Using microarrays containing approximately 18,400 mRNA transcripts, 342 genes were identified (269 upregulated and 73 downregulated) that showed statistically significant levels of differential regulation by Tax (p < 0.05) (Tables 1 and 2).

Table 1.

Genes upregulated by Tax (fold change ≥ 2.0, p < 0.05)

Gene symbol Gene description Gene ID Fold change
 
Transcription/Translation/RNA processing
 
 
FOXF1
forkhead box F1
2294
2.0
NFKB2
nuclear factor of kappa light polypeptide gene enhancer in B-cells 2 (p49/p100)
4791
2.0
NR6A1
nuclear receptor subfamily 6, group A, member 1
2649
2.0
CEBPD
CCAAT/enhancer binding protein (C/EBP), delta
1052
2.1
ETV5
ets variant 5
2119
2.1
FST
follistatin
10468
2.2
KLF6
Kruppel-like factor 6
1316
2.2
CEBPD
CCAAT/enhancer binding protein (C/EBP), delta
1052
2.3
EGR3
early growth response 3
1960
2.3
SAMD4A
sterile alpha motif domain containing 4A
23034
2.3
ELL2
elongation factor, RNA polymerase II, 2
22936
2.4
HIVEP2
human immunodeficiency virus type I enhancer binding protein 2
3097
2.4
MAFB
v-maf musculoaponeurotic fibrosarcoma oncogene homolog B (avian)
9935
2.4
FOSL2
FOS-like antigen 2
2355
2.5
ID2
inhibitor of DNA binding 2, dominant negative helix-loop-helix protein
3398
2.5
KLF2
Kruppel-like factor 2 (lung)
10365
2.5
RELB
v-rel reticuloendotheliosis viral oncogene homolog B
5971
2.5
MAFF
v-maf musculoaponeurotic fibrosarcoma oncogene homolog F (avian)
23764
2.8
LARP6
La ribonucleoprotein domain family, member 6
55323
3.1
REL
v-rel reticuloendotheliosis viral oncogene homolog (avian)
5966
3.1
FOSB
FBJ murine osteosarcoma viral oncogene homolog B
2354
3.2
HES1
hairy and enhancer of split 1 (Drosophila)
3280
3.2
SOD2
superoxide dismutase 2, mitochondrial
6648
3.4
ATF3
activating transcription factor 3
467
3.6
FOSL1
FOS-like antigen 1
8061
4.1
ZFP36
zinc finger protein 36, C3H type, homolog (mouse)
7538
4.2
ZNF331
zinc finger protein 331
55422
4.4
BACH2
BTB and CNC homology 1, basic leucine zipper transcription factor 2
60468
4.4
NFKBIE
nuclear factor of kappa light polypeptide gene enhancer in B-cells inhibitor, epsilon
4794
4.4
EGR1
early growth response 1
1958
6.2
FOS
FBJ murine osteosarcoma viral oncogene homolog
2353
8.4
NR4A2
nuclear receptor subfamily 4, group A, member 2
4929
10.9
 
Signal Transduction
 
 
EDN2
endothelin 2
1907
2.0
EPHA2
EPH receptor A2
1969
2.1
RIT1
Ras-like without CAAX 1
6016
2.1
SH2D3A
SH2 domain containing 3A
10045
2.1
KLRC1
killer cell lectin-like receptor subfamily C, member 1///killer cell lectin-like receptor subfamily C, member 2
3821
2.2
PSD4
pleckstrin and Sec7 domain containing 4
23550
2.5
ADM
adrenomedullin
133
2.7
GPRC5C
G-protein-coupled receptor, family C, group 5, member C
55890
2.7
BDKRB2
bradykinin receptor B2
624
2.8
GDF15
growth differentiation factor 15
9518
3.0
GPR87
G protein-coupled receptor 87
53836
3.4
RASA4
RAS p21 protein activator 4///RAS p21 protein activator 4 pseudogene
10156
8.8
GEM
GTP binding protein overexpressed in skeletal muscle
2669
14.1
GABBR1
gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) B receptor, 1///ubiquitin D
10537
24.5
RRAD
Ras-related associated with diabetes
6236
115.2
 
Inflammatory response/Immune response
 
 
KLRC1
killer cell lectin-like receptor subfamily C, member 1
3821
2.2
PTGS2
prostaglandin-endoperoxide synthase 2 (prostaglandin G/H synthase and cyclooxygenase)
5743
2.3
CCL22
chemokine (C-C motif) ligand 22
6367
3.0
IL6R
interleukin 6 receptor
3570
3.0
TNIP1
TNFAIP3 interacting protein 1
10318
3.2
EBI3
Epstein-Barr virus induced 3
10148
3.2
IL27RA
interleukin 27 receptor, alpha
9466
3.5
TRIM22
tripartite motif-containing 22
10346
3.8
IL32
interleukin 32
9235
3.8
TNFAIP6
tumor necrosis factor, alpha-induced protein 6
7130
4.0
GBP2
guanylate binding protein 2, interferon-inducible
2634
5.2
GBP2
guanylate binding protein 2, interferon-inducible
2634
5.4
CCL19
chemokine (C-C motif) ligand 19
6363
6.2
CXCL1
chemokine (C-X-C motif) ligand 1 (melanoma growth stimulating activity, alpha)
2919
11.7
CXCL11
chemokine (C-X-C motif) ligand 11
6373
13.1
CXCL3
chemokine (C-X-C motif) ligand 3
2921
19.1
CCL20
chemokine (C-C motif) ligand 20
6364
20.1
PTX3
pentraxin-related gene, rapidly induced by IL-1 beta
5806
81.1
CXCL2
chemokine (C-X-C motif) ligand 2
2920
87.0
 
Apoptosis regulation
 
 
ZMAT3
zinc finger, matrin type 3
64393
2.0
JMJD6
jumonji domain containing 6
23210
2.0
AEN
apoptosis enhancing nuclease
64782
2.1
ADORA2A
adenosine A2a receptor
135
2.2
CD70
CD70 molecule
970
2.2
FAS
Fas (TNF receptor superfamily, member 6)
355
2.3
BAG3
BCL2-associated athanogene 3
9531
2.4
BIK
BCL2-interacting killer (apoptosis-inducing)
638
2.4
BCL6
B-cell CLL/lymphoma 6
604
2.7
TNFRSF1B
tumor necrosis factor receptor superfamily, member 1B
7133
3.3
ZC3H12A
zinc finger CCCH-type containing 12A
80149
4.1
NFKBIA
nuclear factor of kappa light polypeptide gene enhancer in B-cells inhibitor, alpha
4792
5.2
NR4A1
nuclear receptor subfamily 4, group A, member 1
3164
5.4
IER3
immediate early response 3
8870
5.7
TNFAIP3
tumor necrosis factor, alpha-induced protein 3
7128
6.4
BTG2
BTG family, member 2
7832
7.0
TNFRSF9
tumor necrosis factor receptor superfamily, member 9
3604
8.2
BIRC3
baculoviral IAP repeat-containing 3
330
14.8
IL6
interleukin 6 (interferon, beta 2)
3569
18.0
 
Cell cycle regulation
 
 
GADD45A
growth arrest and DNA-damage-inducible, alpha
1647
2.2
RGS2
regulator of G-protein signaling 2, 24 kDa
5997
2.2
MAP3K8
mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase kinase 8
1326
2.3
SESN1
sestrin 1
27244
2.6
CDKN1A
cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor 1A (p21, Cip1)
1026
2.8
CYLD
cylindromatosis (turban tumor syndrome)
1540
2.9
PLK2
polo-like kinase 2 (Drosophila)
10769
3.0
SMAD3
SMAD family member 3
4088
4.4
JUN
jun oncogene
3725
4.6
GADD45B
growth arrest and DNA-damage-inducible, beta
4616
4.8
DUSP1
dual specificity phosphatase 1
1843
8.5
IL8
interleukin 8
3576
41.7
 
Regulation of cell growth/Regulation of cell proliferation
 
 
ZMAT3
zinc finger, matrin type 3
64393
2.0
CSF1
colony stimulating factor 1 (macrophage)
1435
2.1
FGFR2
fibroblast growth factor receptor 2
2263
2.1
ABTB2
ankyrin repeat and BTB (POZ) domain containing 2
25841
2.4
SOCS2
suppressor of cytokine signaling 2
8835
2.4
PGF
placental growth factor
5228
2.6
HBEGF
heparin-binding EGF-like growth factor
1839
2.7
LIF
leukemia inhibitory factor (cholinergic differentiation factor)
3976
2.9
FGF18
fibroblast growth factor 18
8817
4.9
CCL2
chemokine (C-C motif) ligand 2
6347
6.7
IL11
interleukin 11
3589
7.4
RARRES1
retinoic acid receptor responder (tazarotene induced) 1
5918
7.5
IGFBP1
insulin-like growth factor binding protein 1
3484
32.2
DLGAP4
discs, large (Drosophila) homolog-associated protein 4
22839
2.5
EFNA1
ephrin-A1
1942
2.5
WNT4
wingless-type MMTV integration site family, member 4
54361
9.3
 
Cell adhesion
 
 
LYPD3
LY6/PLAUR domain containing 3
27076
2.0
PDZD2
PDZ domain containing 2
23037
2.1
FERMT2
fermitin family homolog 2 (Drosophila)
10979
2.2
NINJ1
ninjurin 1
4814
2.2
SIRPA
signal-regulatory protein alpha
140885
2.2
COL7A1
collagen, type VII, alpha 1
1294
2.3
LAMB3
laminin, beta 3
3914
2.6
CDH5
cadherin 5, type 2 (vascular endothelium)
1003
4.4
CTGF
connective tissue growth factor
1490
4.4
SAA1
serum amyloid A1///serum amyloid A2
6288
10.3
ICAM1
intercellular adhesion molecule 1
3383
10.8
 
Transport
 
 
SLC37A1
solute carrier family 37 (glycerol-3-phosphate transporter), member 1
54020
2.0
SLC1A3
solute carrier family 1 (glial high affinity glutamate transporter), member 3
6507
2.2
C19orf28
chromosome 19 open reading frame 28
126321
2.6
NPTX1
neuronal pentraxin I
4884
2.6
SLC2A6
solute carrier family 2 (facilitated glucose transporter), member 6
11182
3.5
HBA1
hemoglobin, alpha 1
3039
5.4
 
Metabolic process
 
 
HMGCS1
3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-Coenzyme A synthase 1 (soluble)
3157
2.0
PTGS1
prostaglandin-endoperoxide synthase 1 (prostaglandin G/H synthase and cyclooxygenase)
5742
2.0
IDS
iduronate 2-sulfatase
3423
2.2
PI4K2A
phosphatidylinositol 4-kinase type 2 alpha
55361
2.2
PLA2G4C
phospholipase A2, group IVC (cytosolic, calcium-independent)
8605
2.2
C12orf5
chromosome 12 open reading frame 5
57103
2.3
PANX1
pannexin 1
24145
2.3
ABCA1
ATP-binding cassette, subfamily A (ABC1), member 1
19
2.4
AMPD3
adenosine monophosphate deaminase (isoform E)
272
2.4
SAT1
spermidine/spermine N1-acetyltransferase 1
6303
2.5
AKR1B1
aldo-keto reductase family 1, member B1 (aldose reductase)
231
2.6
GCNT3
glucosaminyl (N-acetyl) transferase 3, mucin type
9245
2.6
PITPNM1
phosphatidylinositol transfer protein, membrane-associated 1
9600
2.6
MICAL2
microtubule-associated monoxygenase, calponin and LIM domain containing 2
9645
3.2
PPAP2B
phosphatidic acid phosphatase type 2B
8613
3.2
ARG2
arginase, type II
384
4.1
PTGES
prostaglandin E synthase
9536
4.7
GFPT2
glutamine-fructose-6-phosphate transaminase 2
9945
5.0
 
Phosphorylation/Dephosphorylation
 
 
DUSP6
dual specificity phosphatase 6
1848
2.0
FAM129A
family with sequence similarity 129, member A
116496
2.3
DUSP13
dual specificity phosphatase 13
51207
2.6
DUSP5
dual specificity phosphatase 5
1847
4.1
PTPRE
protein tyrosine phosphatase, receptor type, E
5791
4.1
 
Response to stress
 
 
HSPA2
heat shock 70 kDa protein 2
3306
2.3
HSPA1A
heat shock 70 kDa protein 1A
3303
2.9
HSPB8
heat shock 22 kDa protein 8
26353
3.1
HSPB3
heat shock 27 kDa protein 3
8988
4.0
HSPB7
heat shock 27 kDa protein family, member 7 (cardiovascular)
27129
4.0
DNAJB1
DnaJ (Hsp40) homolog, subfamily B, member 1
3337
4.2
HSPA6
heat shock 70 kDa protein 6
3310
7.6
 
Ubiquitin
 
 
ENC1
ectodermal-neural cortex (with BTB-like domain)
8507
2.3
MAP1LC3C
microtubule-associated protein 1 light chain 3 gamma
440738
3.4
 
Others/Unknown
 
 
OLR1
oxidized low density lipoprotein (lectin-like) receptor 1
4973
2.0
TRIB1
tribbles homolog 1 (Drosophila)
10221
2.0
UNC13A
unc-13 homolog A (C. elegans)
23025
2.0
SNAI1
snail homolog 1 (Drosophila)
6615
2.1
FSTL3
follistatin-like 3 (secreted glycoprotein)
10272
2.2
GAB2
GRB2-associated binding protein 2
9846
2.2
PDLIM3
PDZ and LIM domain 3
27295
2.2
PMEPA1
prostate transmembrane protein, androgen induced 1
56937
2.2
SLC1A3
solute carrier family 1 (glial high affinity glutamate transporter), member 3
6507
2.2
FNDC3B
fibronectin type III domain containing 3B
64778
2.3
PHLDA3
pleckstrin homology-like domain, family A, member 3
23612
2.3
SLC25A4
solute carrier family 25 (mitochondrial carrier; adenine nucleotide translocator), member 4
291
2.3
TPM4
tropomyosin 4
7171
2.3
DSE
dermatan sulfate epimerase
29940
2.5
VEGFC
vascular endothelial growth factor C
7424
2.5
CSTA
cystatin A (stefin A)
1475
2.6
ZDHHC18
zinc finger, DHHC-type containing 18
84243
2.6
CDK2AP2
cyclin-dependent kinase 2 associated protein 2
10263
2.7
TIPARP
TCDD-inducible poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase
25976
2.7
CSTA
cystatin A (stefin A)
1475
2.8
TNFAIP2
tumor necrosis factor, alpha-induced protein 2
7127
2.8
PSD4
pleckstrin and Sec7 domain containing 4
23550
3.1
KRT17
keratin 17
3872
3.7
ARC
activity-regulated cytoskeleton-associated protein
23237
5.4
LXN
latexin
56925
5.5
TRIM31 tripartite motif-containing 31 11074 20.1

Table 2.

Genes downregulated by Tax (fold change ≥ 2.0, p < 0.05)

Gene symbol Gene description Gene ID Fold change
 
Transcription/Translation/RNA processing
 
 
ANP32A
Cerebellar leucine rich acidic nuclear protein (LANP)
8125
2.0
EID1
EP300 interacting inhibitor of differentiation 1
23741
2.0
PAIP1
poly(A) binding protein interacting protein 1
10605
2.0
RBM4
RNA binding motif protein 4
5936
2.0
SFRS7
splicing factor, arginine/serine-rich 7, 35 kDa
6432
2.0
SR140
U2-associated SR140 protein
23350
2.0
BCLAF1
BCL2-associated transcription factor 1
9774
2.1
IMPACT
Impact homolog (mouse)
55364
2.3
LSM5
LSM5 homolog, U6 small nuclear RNA associated (S. cerevisiae)
23658
2.3
MRPS14
mitochondrial ribosomal protein S14
63931
2.3
SUB1
SUB1 homolog (S. cerevisiae)
10923
2.3
ZNF623
zinc finger protein 623
9831
2.3
BRIP1
BRCA1 interacting protein C-terminal helicase 1
83990
2.4
TTF2
transcription termination factor, RNA polymerase II
8458
2.6
 
Signal transduction
 
 
PDE1A
phosphodiesterase 1A, calmodulin-dependent
5136
2.0
PDE3A
phosphodiesterase 3A, cGMP-inhibited
5139
2.0
PRKCI
protein kinase C, iota
5584
2.1
SRI
sorcin
6717
2.8
 
Immune response/Response to virus
 
 
DDX58
DEAD (Asp-Glu-Ala-Asp) box polypeptide 58
23586
2.2
IFI44
interferon-induced protein 44
10561
2.2
DDX60
DEAD (Asp-Glu-Ala-Asp) box polypeptide 60
55601
3.0
IFIT3
interferon-induced protein with tetratricopeptide repeats 3
3437
4.1
IFIT2
interferon-induced protein with tetratricopeptide repeats 2
3433
4.4
IFIT1
interferon-induced protein with tetratricopeptide repeats 1
3434
6.0
OASL
2'-5'-oligoadenylate synthetase-like
8638
6.4
 
Apoptosis
 
 
CARD10
caspase recruitment domain family, member 10
29775
2.0
BCLAF1
BCL2-associated transcription factor 1
9774
2.1
 
Cell cycle
 
 
MAD2L1
MAD2 mitotic arrest deficient-like 1 (yeast)
4085
2.0
KIF11
kinesin family member 11
3832
2.1
NF2
neurofibromin 2 (merlin)
4771
2.1
SEP11
septin 11
55752
2.1
CENPF
centromere protein F, 350/400 ka (mitosin)
1063
2.5
 
Regulation of cell proliferation
 
 
BMP2
bone morphogenetic protein 2
650
2.2
DAB2
disabled homolog 2, mitogen-responsive phosphoprotein (Drosophila)
1601
2.4
FGF2
fibroblast growth factor 2 (basic)
2247
3.4
 
Cell signaling
 
 
PCSK1
proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 1
5122
4.8
 
Cell adhesion
 
 
CD24
CD24 molecule
100133941
2.3
PKP2
plakophilin 2
5318
2.3
COL14A1
collagen, type XIV, alpha 1
7373
2.5
 
Nucleosome assembly
 
 
H2AFV
H2A histone family, member V
94239
2.0
 
Transport
 
 
CNGB1
cyclic nucleotide gated channel beta 1
1258
2.0
SCNN1A
sodium channel, nonvoltage-gated 1 alpha
6337
2.0
ANO2
anoctamin 2
57101
2.1
CHRNA9
cholinergic receptor, nicotinic, alpha 9
55584
2.2
SORBS1
sorbin and SH3 domain containing 1
10580
2.3
STEAP4
STEAP family member 4
79689
2.3
SRI
sorcin
6717
2.6
 
Metabolic process
 
 
ACSL4
acyl-CoA synthetase long-chain family member 4
2182
2.0
 
Ubiquitin
 
 
FBXO3
F-box protein 3
26273
2.0
HERC6
hect domain and RLD 6
55008
2.1
DZIP3
DAZ interacting protein 3, zinc finger
9666
2.3
HERC5
hect domain and RLD 5
51191
4.8
 
Others/Unknown
 
 
NIP7
nuclear import 7 homolog (S. cerevisiae)
51388
2.0
PPL
periplakin
5493
2.0
ADK
adenosine kinase
132
2.1
DIO2
deiodinase, iodothyronine, type II
1734
2.1
PICALM
phosphatidylinositol binding clathrin assembly protein
8301
2.1
METAP2
methionyl aminopeptidase 2
10988
2.2
HIP1R
huntingtin interacting protein 1 related
9026
2.3
ERAP1
KIAA0525 protein
51752
2.4
DAB2 disabled homolog 2, mitogen-responsive phosphoprotein (Drosophila) 1601 2.5

The upregulated genes (2-fold or greater) were clustered within functional groups involved in transcription/translation/RNA processing, signal transduction, the immune response, apoptosis, cell cycle regulation, and cell growth/proliferation (Table 1). In addition, a number of molecules involved in the immune response were significantly downregulated by Tax (Table 2).

Tax induces the expression of genes related to cell cycle progression and apoptosis

It was hypothesized that changes in gene expression may provide valuable information about the dysregulation of cell cycle progression induced by Tax and about how Tax might affect the genes relevant to this process. As shown in Figure 2A, of 17 genes related to cell cycle progression that were regulated by Tax, five were downregulated and 12 were upregulated (fold change > 2.0; p < 0.05). Genes associated with mitosis (CENPF, SEP11, and NF2), including the mitotic cell cycle checkpoint (MAD2L1) and mitotic centrosome separation (KIF11), were repressed by Tax. By contrast, genes upregulated by Tax were functionally classified as genes related to the cell cycle (GADD45A, RGS2, MAP3K8, SESN1, CDKN1A, CYLD, PLK2, SMAD3, JUN, GADD45B, DUSP1 and IL8). Many of these genes are also involved in other processes, such as the response to stress (GADD45B), the response to DNA damage (GADD45A, SESN1, CDKN1A), MAP kinase activity (GADD45B, MAP3K8, DUSP1), cell proliferation (JUN and IL8), and negative regulation of the cell cycle (CYLD, PLK2 and SMAD3). Genes such as SMAD3, GADD45B, and DUSP1 were also identified as having a role in apoptosis, and IL8 is additionally involved in inflammation and the immune response.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Expression profile of genes involved in cell cycle regulation and apoptosis that were altered following the induction of Tax protein. Heat maps showing the hierarchical clustering of genes involved in cell cycle regulation (A) and apoptosis (C) are shown for Tax-expressing cells. The color scheme indicates the fold change in gene expression, with upregulated genes shown in orange/red and downregulated genes shown in blue (with respect to baseline levels under control conditions (yellow)). qRT-PCR validation of the upregulated genes associated with cell cycle regulation (B) and apoptosis (D). RNA from Tax-expressing cells and control cells was used to validate the microarray data. The bars indicate the fold change in gene expression following Tax expression. Data were normalized to GAPDH mRNA. The results represent the mean of two samples from one experiment

The microarray results for genes related to cell cycle progression were validated by performing real-time quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) on five upregulated genes (Figure 2B). The results of the qRT-PCR agreed with those obtained by microarray analysis.

Next, Tax-regulated genes related to apoptosis were identified (Figure 2C). The microarray results revealed that 21 pro- or anti-apoptotic genes were regulated by Tax (fold change > 2.0; p < 0.05). Two genes associated with the induction of apoptosis, CARD10 and BCLAF1, were downregulated by Tax. The majority of the genes upregulated by Tax were involved in apoptosis. Furthermore, several of these genes also function in the immune response (ADORA2A, CD70, FAS, BCL6, TNFRSF1B and IL6). Interestingly, several highly upregulated genes, such as IER3, TNFAIP3, BIRC3 and IL6, have both pro- and anti-apoptotic functions. In contrast, the highly upregulated gene, TNFRSF9, is pro-apoptotic only. TNF and TNF receptor family genes were also found to be upregulated by Tax in this study.

To confirm and extend the results of the microarray experiments, expression of the pro-apoptotic and anti-apoptotic genes regulated by Tax was measured by qRT-PCR using specific primers. Genes upregulated in the microarray were also upregulated in qRT-PCR (Figure 2D), although there were small differences in the levels measured by the two methods. For example, the expression levels of BIRC3 and IL6 measured by qRT-PCR were almost twice that measured by microarray analysis, and the expression level of the apoptosis inductor TNFRSF9 was more than three times higher by qRT-PCR than by microarray. Despite these minor differences, overall gene expression levels measured by qRT-PCR were similar to those measured by microarray analysis.

Visualizing the spatiotemporal dynamics of the regulation of cell cycle progression and apoptosis by tax

To clarify whether Tax causes apoptosis independently of its ability to induce G1 arrest, the spatiotemporal patterns of cell cycle regulation in response to Tax expression were monitored in HeLa/Fucci2 cells [33]. This system was chosen because it allows dual-color imaging, in which G1-phase nuclei are labeled orange and S/G2/M-phase nuclei are labeled green. A fluorescent Tax vector was constructed that allows the identification of Tax-expressing HeLa/Fucci2 cells. This vector contained Tax, an internal ribosomal entry site (IRES), cyan fluorescent protein (CFP), and a Flag sequence at the 3’ end of tax. The vector was expressed in HeLa cells, and Tax-expressing cells were stained with an anti-Flag MAb followed by an Alexa Fluor 594 secondary antibody (red). As shown in Figure 3A, all Tax-expressing cells were CFP-positive (blue).

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Time-lapse imaging of morphological changes in HeLa/Fucci2 cells after Tax-induced cell cycle arrest at G1phase. (A) HeLa cells were transfected with the pCAGGS-Tax-IRES-CFP vector or the control pCAGGS-IRES-CFP vector. At 24 h after transfection, cells were stained with an anti-Flag MAb followed by an Alexa Fluor 594-conjugated secondary MAb and analyzed by confocal laser scanning microscopy (Olympus FV1000). Cells showing red and blue fluorescence express Tax-Flag and CFP, respectively. (B and C) HeLa/Fucci2 cells were transfected with the CAGGS-Tax-IRES-CFP vector or the control pCAGGS-IRES-CFP vector and monitored by time-lapse photography using the Olympus LCV110 Imaging System. One day after transfection, CFP-positive cells were selected and fluorescence and phase images were captured once every 15 min for 2 days. Cells showing orange or green fluorescence are in the G1 or S/G2/M phase of cell cycle, respectively. Apoptotic cells, which show a rounded morphology, are marked by arrows. The populations of CFP-expressing cells at the G1 and S/G2/M phases (D and E, respectively) were quantified using MetaMorph 7.7.4 software

HeLa/Fucci2 cells were plated on a glass coverslip, transiently transfected with Tax-IRES-CFP or the CFP control vector, and then incubated for 24 h. Next, fields containing orange, green, and blue fluorescence were selected and images were acquired using an Olympus LCV110 Imaging System (Figure 3B and 3C). The proliferation of control HeLa/Fucci2 cells was evidenced by the fraction of cells at G1 phase with orange nuclei, the fraction of cells at S/G2/M phase with green nuclei, and the subsequent change in the fluorescence of these cells (Figure 3B upper panel and 3D), which indicated that the cells progressed normally through the cell cycle. At 24 h post-transfection, all HeLa/Fucci2 cells expressing Tax-IRES-CFP, which resulted in blue fluorescence, also had orange nuclei, indicating that they were in G1 phase (Figure 3B, lower panel). During the culture period, HeLa/Fucci2 cells expressing Tax-IRES-CFP did not progress to S/G2/M phase, as evidenced by the presence of orange nuclei and the absence of green nuclei in Tax-expressing cells (Figure 3B). Additionally, a marked decrease was observed in the proportion of Tax-IRES-CFP-expressing cells in S/G2/M phase compared with control cells expressing CFP alone (Figure 3D), indicating that Tax arrests cells at the G1 phase of the cell cycle.

Interestingly, overexpression of Tax appeared to reduce the number of HeLa/Fucci2 cells in culture (Figure 3E). Moreover, apoptosis was assessed by the appearance of rounded cells after an increase in the number of Tax-expressing cells at G1 phase, starting at 36 h post-transfection (Figure 3B and 3C). At 72 h post transfection, there was a notable reduction in the overall number of cells, as well as in the percentage of Tax-expressing cells (Figure 3C and 3E).

Expression kinetics of genes involved in cell cycle regulation and apoptosis that are altered following induction of tax protein

To analyze the correlation between the expression of genes related to cell cycle regulation (IL8, SMAD3, CDKN1A, GADD45A and GADD45B) and apoptosis (IL6) (that are altered following the induction of Tax) with the dynamics of cell cycle and apoptosis (shown in Figure 3), total RNA was prepared at 12, 24, 36 and 48 h after transfection of HeLa cells with Tax or a control vector. Each RNA sample was then subjected to qRT-PCR. As indicated in Figure 4, the expression levels of SMAD3, GADD45A and GADD45B in Tax-transfected cells began to increase from 6 h post-transfection and reached a peak at 24 h, decreasing again by 36 h. In the case of IL8, CDKN1A and IL6 in Tax-expressing cells, the expression levels reached a peak at 24 h, decreased at 36 h, and then increased again at 48 h.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Expression kinetics of genes involved in cell cycle regulation and apoptosis that were altered following induction of Tax. HeLa cells were transiently transfected with a pCAGGS-Tax Flag-tagged vector or the control pCAGGS vector. Total RNA was prepared at 12, 24, 36 and 48 h after transfection and then each RNA sample was subjected to qRT-PCR. The bars indicate the fold change in the gene following Tax expression. Data were normalized to GAPDH mRNA. The results represent the mean ± standard deviation (SD) of three samples from one experiment

The kinetics and results from time-lapse imaging indicate that marked upregulation of IL8, SMAD3, CDKN1A, GADD45A, GADD45B and IL6 at 24 h post-transfection was well correlated with a notable reduction in the number of Tax-expressing cells and an increase of Tax-expressing cells in the G1 phase.

Discussion

This study used large-scale host cell gene profiling with human cDNA microarrays and time-lapse imaging of HeLa/Fucci2 cells to monitor the dynamics of Tax-induced cell death. Three major conclusions can be drawn from the data: (i) Tax induces cell cycle arrest at the G1 phase in HeLa cells as assessed by flow cytometry. This result was confirmed by the accumulation of hypo- and/or unphosphorylated form of Rb in Tax-expressing cells. Moreover, analysis of Annexin V-stained cells and caspase-3 activity clearly demonstrated that Tax promotes apoptosis. Thus, a high level of transiently-expressed Tax can arrest the cell cycle at the G1 phase and induce apoptosis in HeLa cells. (ii) The most interesting aspect of this study was visualizing the morphological dynamics of Tax-induced cell death after cell cycle arrest at the G1 phase. Time-lapse imaging of HeLa/Fucci2 cells showed that Tax-induced apoptosis was dependent on the ability of Tax to induce G1 arrest. (iii) Microarray data revealed that Tax induced gene expression changes in HeLa cells; 17 Tax-dependent genes were found to be related to cell cycle regulation and 23 to apoptosis (> 2.0-fold up- or downregulation). (iv) The kinetics of gene expression identified that Tax-induced changes in the expression of IL8, SMAD3, CDKN1A, GADD45A, GADD45B and IL6 closely correlated with the morphological changes of the cell cycle and apoptosis observed by time-lapse imaging. Since these genes are related not only to cell cycle regulation and apoptosis induction, but also to stress kinase pathways, the present study suggests that Tax may induce apoptosis and cell cycle arrest by activating genes related to stress-response signaling pathways.

Many studies show that the Tax oncoprotein accelerates G1 progression [3,4,7-12] and is capable of stimulating anti-apoptotic signaling pathways [29,30,36,37]. In contrast, the present study showed that Tax arrests cells at G1, thereby inducing apoptosis. Our results consist with previous results obtained using HeLa cells and SupT1 cells [20,38]. There may be possible explanations for how Tax induces cell cycle arrest and apoptosis. One interesting finding from our microarray analysis was the marked activation of stress kinase pathways induced by Tax. In mammalian cells, two families of stress-responsive MAPKs, c-Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK) and p38, are activated by stimuli such as UV radiation, oxidative stress and translation inhibitors, as well as by inflammatory cytokines, tumor necrosis factor α (TNFα), and transforming growth factor β (TGFβ). These signaling pathways promote apoptosis, cell survival, cell cycle arrest, inflammation and differentiation [39,40]. Interestingly, microarray analysis revealed that genes such as SMAD3 and SMAD4, which are the principal intracellular effectors of the TGFβ family [41,42]; GADD45A and GADD45B, which are implicated as stress sensors and activated by TGFβ in a SMAD-dependent manner [43-45]; DUSP1, DUSP5, DUSP6 and DUSP13, which are stress-inducible MAP kinase phosphatases [46]; MAP kinase kinase kinase 8 (MAP3K8) [46]; JUN [46], which is the effector transcription factor of the JNK pathway; and IL6, IL8 and FAS, which are inflammatory cytokines, were all upregulated by Tax. These genes, expressed in response to Tax, are mediators of JNK and p38 activity. In addition, we found that the kinetics of altered expression of several genes related to pathways involving stress-responsive MAPKs were closely correlated with the kinetics of the spatial and temporal patterns of cell cycle dynamics analyzed in time-lapse imaging. At 24 h post-transfection with Tax expression vectors, the genes for IL8, SMAD3, CDKN1A, GADD45A, GADD45B and IL6 were significantly upregulated (Figure 4) and the number of Tax-IRES-CFP-expressing cells were in G1 phase and underwent apoptosis started to increase at same timing (Figure 3). Thus, the present results suggest that Tax may induce apoptosis and cell cycle arrest by activating several genes related to stress-response signaling pathways. This is supported by a recent publication showing that Tax, along with the activation of a stress kinase, can induce cell death [31]. Furthermore, the present findings consist with those observed by previous microarray analysis studies of HTLV-1-infected T cells, which demonstrated that HTLV-1 infection upregulated JNK activation kinase 1, GADD45 and the inflammatory cytokine, IL1β, which are involved in MAPK stress-response pathways [23]. Recently, HTLV-1 Tax appeared indirectly to connect to cell cycle proteins such as SMAD3, SMAD4, GADD45A and GADD45B [47].

Our microarray analysis results identified one of the genes upregulated by Tax as CDKN1A, which codes p21CIP1/WAF1, known as Cdk inhibitor 1. Again, this is in agreement with results from other microarray analyses showing that HTLV-1 infection and Tax expression upregulated p21CIP1/WAF1 in HTLV-1-infected T cells [23] and the human Jurkat T-cell line JPX-9, which express Tax under the control of an inducible promoter [48]. Likewise, Tax has previously been shown to dramatically upregulate p21CIP1/WAF1 mRNA transcription and stabilization of p21CIP1/WAF1 in HeLa cells [20,21]. Interestingly, only minimal p21/WAF1 promoter activity appears to be induced by Tax [23]. It is also known that basal levels of p21CIP1/WAF1 are required to promote TGFβ-mediated cell cycle arrest, whereas a lack of p21CIP1/WAF1 allows the induction of cell proliferation in response to TGFβ [49]. Indeed, the loss of p21CIP1/WAF1 and p27KIP1 from HOS cells apparently allows HTLV-1-and Tax-induced G1 arrest to be bypassed [20]. Therefore, Tax may induce cell cycle arrest and apoptosis in HeLa cells by up-regulating GADD45B, SMAD3 and SMAD4 (which act downstream of TGFβ) in the presence of p21CIP1/WAF1 (which is activated by Tax).

In HTLV-1 infected T cell lines, upregulated p21CIP1/WAF1 may potentially function as an assembly factor for the cyclin D2/cdk4 complex, and the p21/cyclin D2/cdk4 complex may not act as an inhibitory complex but instead may allow the increased phosphorylation of Rb and accelerated progression into S phase [50]. In the present study, Tax-mediated G1 arrest occurred in human papilloma virus type 18 (HPV-18)-transformed HeLa cells, in which the Rb pathway was activated by repression of HPV-18 E7 [51]. Indeed, in cells transfected with the control vector, the majority of Rb was in the hyperphosphorylated form ppRb (Figure 1E). By contrast, an accumulation of hypo- and/or unphosphorylated form pRb was observed in Tax-expressing HeLa cells, which is in contrast to the results of study showing that Tax increased the phosphorylation of Rb family members [19]. Therefore, there is a strong possibility that Tax-activated p21CIP1/WAF1 may function to inhibit the cyclin D2/cdk4 complex, thereby inducing cell cycle arrest.

Our microarray result also shows that Tax upregulated the expression of BCL6 gene encodes a sequences-specific transcriptional repressor by 2.7 fold. This supported by the findings in previous study [52], which described that an interaction of Tax with the POZ domain of BCL6 enhances the repressive activity of BCL6 and increased the levels of apoptosis induced by BCL6 in osteosarcoma cells. The BCL6 POZ domain mediates transcriptional repression by interacting with several corepressors including silencing mediator for retinoid and thyroid receptor and nuclear hormone receptor corepressor, BCL6 corepressor together with many histone deacetylases. BCL6 colocalizes with these corepressors in punctate nuclear structures that have been identified as sites of ongoing DNA replication. Interestingly, BCL6 appeared to recruite Tax into punctate nuclear structures and significantly downregulate both basal and Tax-induced NF-kB and long terminal repeat activation [52]. Thus, the high expression of BCL6 in HTLV infected cells may contribute to the silencing of viral gene expression and to the long clinical latency associated with HTLV infection.

This study allows greater understanding of the biological events affected by HTLV-1 Tax, particularly the regulation of cellular proliferation and apoptosis. Since we found evidence of several similarities, as well as differences, between Tax-expressing HeLa cells and HTLV infection in T cell lines, we believe that the overexpression of Tax will be useful for preliminary studies on the effects of HTLV infection in T cell lines. However, since Zane et al. recently demonstrated that infected CD4+ T cells in vivo are positively selected for cell cycling but not cell death [53], our experimental approaches in HeLa cells may not be reflective of normal physiology of Tax or HTLV-1 in vivo infected cells. Therefore, further detailed studies are required to define the direct and indirect effects of Tax-mediated cellular processes to gain a better understanding of the contribution of Tax to HTLV-1 pathogenesis in vivo.

Conclusion

The present study showed that Tax arrested cells at the G1 phase of the cell cycle, thereby inducing apoptosis. Taken together, the results demonstrate that Tax exerts a significant impact on cellular factors that regulate the cell cycle and the induction of apoptosis. Importantly, to the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to highlight the morphological dynamics of Tax-induced cell death after cell cycle arrest at the G1 phase.

This overview can be extended to Tax-mediated signaling, and further study of the interactions between Tax and cellular factors will provide insights into the mechanisms by which Tax regulates host cell behavior, as well as the mechanisms underlying lymphoma induction and progression induced by HTLV-1.

Methods

Cell lines and transfections

Human cervical HeLa cells and Fucci2-expressing HeLa cells (HeLa/Fucci2) [33] were maintained in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM) (Invitrogen) supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum (FBS) and 100 units/ml penicillin/streptomycin (Sigma). Cells were transiently transfected with a Tax expression vector, or a control vector, using Fugene HD (Roche) according to the manufacturer’s instructions.

Plasmid construction

The HTLV-1 tax gene was amplified from the HTLV-1 infectious molecular clone, K30 [54], using the primers HTax-F (5’-3’, AACTCGAGGCCACCATGGCCCATTTCCCAGGGTTTGGAC) and HTax-R (5’-3’, AAGCGGCCGCTCACTTGTCGTCATCGTCTTTGTAGTCGACTTCTGTTTCTCGGAAATGTTTTTCACTGG). The underlined sequences correspond to restriction enzyme sites specific for XhoI and NotI, respectively. A Flag sequence was included at the 3’ end of the tax gene. Full-length tax was then cloned into the XhoI and NotI restriction sites in the pCAGGS mammalian expression vector [55]. To generate the pCAGGS-Tax-IRES-CFP vector and the pCAGGS-IRES-CFP control vector, the IRES was amplified from the pRetroX-IRES-ZsGreen1 vector (Clontech) and CFP was amplified from the pCS2+ vector (Clontech). The IRES and CFP sequences were then inserted into the pCAGGS control vector or a pCAGGS vector containing Flag-tagged Tax. The vector pEGFP-N1 encodes a red-shifted variant of wild-type GFP that was modified for brighter fluorescence [56] and which was used as a reporter to identify transfected cells by flow cytometry. The pSV-β-galactosidase vector (Promega) encoding a bacterial β-galactosidase and pRL-SV40 (Promega) encoding Renilla luciferase were used to normalize the transfection efficiency. pGV-HL21 encodes five tandemly repeated 21 bp enhancers of HTLV-1, each of which contain a CRE motif and pGV(−) and have been previously decribed [57].

RNA extraction

HeLa cells were transiently transfected with Tax or the control vector and incubated for 30 h. RNA from total cell extracts was isolated using the RNeasy Mini Kit (Qiagen) according to the manufacturer's instructions. RNA was quantified using a spectrophotometer and stored at −80°C. For gene chip analysis, the quality of RNA was determined using the Agilent Bioanalyzer (Agilent Technologies).

Microarray analysis

RNA samples were analyzed by microarray using the GeneChip Human Genome U133A 2.0 Array (Affymetrix). Microarray hybridization and fluorescence detection were performed as described in the Affymetrix Gene-Chip Expression Analysis Technical Manual. Microarray data were deposited in NCBI’s Gene Expression Omnibus and assigned GEO Series accession number GSE34750. GeneSpring GX 11.0 software (Agilent Technologies) was used to identify statistically significant differences in gene expression between samples. For multiple measurements to detect significantly upregulated and downregulated genes, the Bonferroni correction was performed by adjusting the significance level (p < 0.05). Fold changes in gene expression, hierarchical clustering, and gene ontology annotations were determined.

qRT-PCR

Total RNA was prepared using the RNeasy Mini Kit (Qiagen) at 12, 24, 36 and 48 h after transfection with Tax or the control vector. RT-PCR was performed using specific primers and OneStep SYBR Green PCR mix (Takara) following the manufacturer’s instructions. The qRT-PCR was performed using a 7500 Fast Real-time PCR System (Applied Biosystems). All data were normalized to GAPDH mRNA.

Immunoblot analysis

Transfected cells were lysed and proteins were separated on 6%, 10%, or 17% SDS-polyacrylamide gels and then transferred to a PVDF membrane (Immobilon-P, Millipore Corp.) using a Trans-blot SD semi-dry transfer cell (Bio-Rad). Following the transfer, the membranes were blocked in 5% non-fat dry milk in PBS containing 0.1% Tween-20 for 1 h and then incubated with a 1:1000 dilution of primary antibody against Flag (M2, Sigma), Rb (c-15, Santa Cruz Biotechnology), or actin (c-11, Santa Cruz Biotechnology) for 1 h. The membranes were then washed and incubated with anti-mouse, anti-rabbit, or anti-goat horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibodies (Jackson, ImmunoResearch) and developed using the SuperSignal West Pico Chemiluminescent substrate Kit (Pierce).

Immunofluorescence

Cells (1 x 105) were seeded onto 22 mm diameter coverslips in 24-well plates and incubated at 37°C for 24 h before transfection. Cells were transiently transfected with either a Tax expression vector or a control vector using the Fugene HD reagent (Roche). Twenty-four hours later, the cells were washed twice with PBS, fixed in 3.7% formaldehyde, permeabilized using 0.2% Triton X-100, and stained with an anti-Flag MAb (M2, Sigma) followed by an anti-mouse IgG1 antibody conjugated to Alexa Fluor 488 or 494 (Molecular Probes). Subcellular localization was analyzed by confocal laser scanning microscopy (FV1000, Olympus).

Luciferase assay

HeLa cells (1 x 105) were transfected with 1 μg of the reporter plasmid, pGV-HL21 (HTLV-1 enhancer) or pGV(−), 0.3 μg of the reference plasmid, pRL-SV40, and 0.5 μg of the Tax expression vector. At 48 h after transfection, cells were recovered and the activity of firefly and Renilla luciferase was measured in the lysates as previously described [58]. For each sample, firefly luciferase activity (pGV-HL21) was normalized by reference to Renilla luciferase activity (pRL-SV40).

Cell cycle analysis

HeLa cells (4 x 105) were incubated in a 6-well plate at 37°C for 24 h followed by co-transfection for 48 h with 2 μg of the Tax expression vector or the control vector and 0.2 μg of the pEGFP-N1 vector. Cells were collected and washed with PBS without Ca2+ and Mg2+ and then fixed with 1% paraformaldehyde followed by 70% ethanol. After fixation, cells were washed twice with PBS, treated with 200 μg/ml of RNase for 1 h at 37°C, and stained with 50 μg/ml of PI. Fluorescence was analyzed using a FACSCalibur (Becton-Dickinson) flow cytometer and Cell Quest software (Becton-Dickinson). Samples were gated to eliminate cells in which GFP emitted strong fluorescence. The acquired FACS data were analyzed using ModFit LT software (Verity Software House).

Analysis of apoptosis

Flow cytometry was used to detect Annexin V-positive apoptotic cells. Transfected cells were incubated for 48 h and then the cell monolayers were detached with trypsin and ethylendiaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA), washed twice in PBS, and re-suspended in binding buffer (1 x 106 cells/ml). An aliquot of 1 x 105 cells was stained with 7-AAD and Annexin V-PE (BD Biosciences) for 15 min at room temperature according to the manufacturer's instructions and then analyzed on a FACSCalibur flow cytometer (BD Biosciences) with Cell Quest software (BD Biosciences). Cells were considered to be in the early stages of apoptosis if they showed staining for Annexin V-PE but not 7-AAD. The double-positive population was considered to be in the late stages of apoptosis, or already dead.

Caspase-3 activity was measured using a caspase-3/CPP32 fluorometric assay kit, according to the manufacturer's instructions. Briefly, transfected HeLa cells were harvested, washed twice with PBS, and treated with lysis buffer. Cell lysates were centrifuged at 15000 × g for 10 min at 4°C, supernatants were collected, and protein concentrations were determined with the Pierce BCA protein assay kit (Thermo Scientific). For each experimental point, 50 μg of total protein extract was incubated with the substrate for 2 h at 37°C. Caspase activity was quantified spectrophotometrically at a wavelength of 405 nm using a multi-label counter (Model 1420, Wallac Arvo, Perkin Elmer Life Sciences).

Imaging of cultured cells

HeLa/Fucci2 cells were transiently transfected with Tax-IRES-CFP or the control vector and were subjected to long-term, time-lapse imaging using a computer-assisted fluorescence microscope (Olympus, LCV110) equipped with an objective lens (Olympus, UAPO 40×/340 N.A. = 0.90), a halogen lamp, a red LED (620 nm), a CCD camera (Olympus, DP30), differential interference contrast (DIC) optical components, and interference filters. For fluorescence imaging, the halogen lamp was used with three filter cubes for observing mCherry (orange), Venus (green), and CFP (blue) fluorescence. For DIC imaging, the red LED was used with a filter cube containing an analyzer. Image acquisition and analysis were performed using MetaMorph 7.7.4 software (Universal Imaging).

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors' contributions

MA performed the experiments, analyzed the data, and wrote the manuscript. HM performed the qRT-PCR and analyzed the data. YA conceived the study, participated in the experimental design, analyzed and interpreted the results, coordinated experiments, and wrote the manuscript. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript.

Contributor Information

Mariluz Arainga, Email: mariluz@riken.jp.

Hironobu Murakami, Email: hmurakami@riken.jp.

Yoko Aida, Email: aida@riken.jp.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Dr. Eri Takeda for kind help and suggestions; Dr. Shin-nosuke Takeshima for submission of microarray data in the NCBI’s Gene Expression Omnibus and kind help of preparation of manuscript; Mr. Tomoyuki Murakami for help with drawing the figures of the manuscript; Drs. Guangai Xue and Muhammad Atif Zahoor for help with the microarray analysis; and other members of the Viral Infectious Diseases Unit, RIKEN, for their help with the experiments. The authors thank Dr. Atsushi Miyawaki for kindly providing the plasmids (pRSETB-CFP and pCS2+) and HeLa/Fucci2 cells, and Drs. Asako Sakaue-Sawano and Dr. Roger Y. Tsien for kindly providing the HeLa/Fucci2 cells. We would like to thank Mr. Keisuke Fukumoto for help with the microarray analysis; Mr. Tetsuya Tajima for excellent technical assistance with the Imaging; We are grateful to the Support Unit for Bio-material Analysis, RIKEN BSI Research Resources Center for help with sequence and microarray analyses; the RIKEN BSI-Olympus Collaboration Center for help with imaging; and the RIKEN BioResource Center Cell Bank for help with the distribution of HeLa/Fucci2. We thank the NIH AIDS Research and Reference Reagent Program for providing the HTLV-1 infectious molecular clone K-30. This work was supported by a Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (A and B) and by a grant from the Program for the Promotion of Basic and Applied Research for Innovations in Bio-oriented Industry.

References

  1. Poiesz BJ, Ruscetti FW, Gazdar AF, Bunn PA, Minna JD, Gallo RC. Detection and isolation of type C retrovirus particles from fresh and cultured lymphocytes of a patient with cutaneous T-cell lymphoma. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1980;77(12):7415–7419. doi: 10.1073/pnas.77.12.7415. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Gessain A, Barin F, Vernant JC, Gout O, Maurs L, Calender A, de The G. Antibodies to human T-lymphotropic virus type-I in patients with tropical spastic paraparesis. Lancet. 1985;2(8452):407–410. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(85)92734-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Grassmann R, Aboud M, Jeang KT. Molecular mechanisms of cellular transformation by HTLV-1 Tax. Oncogene. 2005;24(39):5976–5985. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1208978. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Boxus M, Twizere JC, Legros S, Dewulf JF, Kettmann R, Willems L. The HTLV-1 Tax interactome. Retrovirology. 2008;5:76. doi: 10.1186/1742-4690-5-76. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Yoshida M. Multiple viral strategies of HTLV-1 for dysregulation of cell growth control. Annu Rev Immunol. 2001;19:475–496. doi: 10.1146/annurev.immunol.19.1.475. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Jeang KT, Giam CZ, Majone F, Aboud M. Life, death, and tax: role of HTLV-I oncoprotein in genetic instability and cellular transformation. J Biol Chem. 2004;279(31):31991–31994. doi: 10.1074/jbc.R400009200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Marriott SJ, Semmes OJ. Impact of HTLV-I Tax on cell cycle progression and the cellular DNA damage repair response. Oncogene. 2005;24(39):5986–5995. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1208976. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Lemoine FJ, Marriott SJ. Accelerated G(1) phase progression induced by the human T cell leukemia virus type I (HTLV-I) Tax oncoprotein. J Biol Chem. 2001;276(34):31851–31857. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M105195200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Liang MH, Geisbert T, Yao Y, Hinrichs SH, Giam CZ. Human T-lymphotropic virus type 1 oncoprotein tax promotes S-phase entry but blocks mitosis. J Virol. 2002;76(8):4022–4033. doi: 10.1128/JVI.76.8.4022-4033.2002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Neuveut C, Jeang KT. Cell cycle dysregulation by HTLV-I: role of the tax oncoprotein. Front Biosci. 2002;7:d157–163. doi: 10.2741/neuveut. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Neuveut C, Low KG, Maldarelli F, Schmitt I, Majone F, Grassmann R, Jeang KT. Human T-cell leukemia virus type 1 Tax and cell cycle progression: role of cyclin D-cdk and p110Rb. Mol Cell Biol. 1998;18(6):3620–3632. doi: 10.1128/mcb.18.6.3620. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Schmitt I, Rosin O, Rohwer P, Gossen M, Grassmann R. Stimulation of cyclin-dependent kinase activity and G1- to S-phase transition in human lymphocytes by the human T-cell leukemia/lymphotropic virus type 1 Tax protein. J Virol. 1998;72(1):633–640. doi: 10.1128/jvi.72.1.633-640.1998. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Iwanaga R, Ohtani K, Hayashi T, Nakamura M. Molecular mechanism of cell cycle progression induced by the oncogene product Tax of human T-cell leukemia virus type I. Oncogene. 2001;20(17):2055–2067. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1204304. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Haller K, Wu Y, Derow E, Schmitt I, Jeang KT, Grassmann R. Physical interaction of human T-cell leukemia virus type 1 Tax with cyclin-dependent kinase 4 stimulates the phosphorylation of retinoblastoma protein. Mol Cell Biol. 2002;22(10):3327–3338. doi: 10.1128/MCB.22.10.3327-3338.2002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Haller K, Ruckes T, Schmitt I, Saul D, Derow E, Grassmann R. Tax-dependent stimulation of G1 phase-specific cyclin-dependent kinases and increased expression of signal transduction genes characterize HTLV type 1-transformed T cells. AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses. 2000;16(16):1683–1688. doi: 10.1089/08892220050193146. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Fraedrich K, Muller B, Grassmann R. The HTLV-1 Tax protein binding domain of cyclin-dependent kinase 4 (CDK4) includes the regulatory PSTAIRE helix. Retrovirology. 2005;2:54. doi: 10.1186/1742-4690-2-54. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Huang Y, Ohtani K, Iwanaga R, Matsumura Y, Nakamura M. Direct trans-activation of the human cyclin D2 gene by the oncogene product Tax of human T-cell leukemia virus type I. Oncogene. 2001;20(9):1094–1102. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1204198. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Mori N, Fujii M, Hinz M, Nakayama K, Yamada Y, Ikeda S, Yamasaki Y, Kashanchi F, Tanaka Y, Tomonaga M. et al. Activation of cyclin D1 and D2 promoters by human T-cell leukemia virus type I tax protein is associated with IL-2-independent growth of T cells. Int J Cancer. 2002;99(3):378–385. doi: 10.1002/ijc.10388. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Iwanaga R, Ozono E, Fujisawa J, Ikeda MA, Okamura N, Huang Y, Ohtani K. Activation of the cyclin D2 and cdk6 genes through NF-kappaB is critical for cell-cycle progression induced by HTLV-I Tax. Oncogene. 2008;27(42):5635–5642. doi: 10.1038/onc.2008.174. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Liu M, Yang L, Zhang L, Liu B, Merling R, Xia Z, Giam CZ. Human T-cell leukemia virus type 1 infection leads to arrest in the G1 phase of the cell cycle. J Virol. 2008;82(17):8442–8455. doi: 10.1128/JVI.00091-08. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Zhang L, Zhi H, Liu M, Kuo YL, Giam CZ. Induction of p21(CIP1/WAF1) expression by human T-lymphotropic virus type 1 Tax requires transcriptional activation and mRNA stabilization. Retrovirology. 2009;6:35. doi: 10.1186/1742-4690-6-35. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. de La Fuente C, Santiago F, Chong SY, Deng L, Mayhood T, Fu P, Stein D, Denny T, Coffman F, Azimi N. et al. Overexpression of p21(waf1) in human T-cell lymphotropic virus type 1-infected cells and its association with cyclin A/cdk2. J Virol. 2000;74(16):7270–7283. doi: 10.1128/JVI.74.16.7270-7283.2000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. de La Fuente C, Deng L, Santiago F, Arce L, Wang L, Kashanchi F. Gene expression array of HTLV type 1-infected T cells: Up-regulation of transcription factors and cell cycle genes. AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses. 2000;16(16):1695–1700. doi: 10.1089/08892220050193164. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Chen X, Zachar V, Zdravkovic M, Guo M, Ebbesen P, Liu X. Role of the Fas/Fas ligand pathway in apoptotic cell death induced by the human T cell lymphotropic virus type I Tax transactivator. J Gen Virol. 1997;78(Pt 12):3277–3285. doi: 10.1099/0022-1317-78-12-3277. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Chlichlia K, Busslinger M, Peter ME, Walczak H, Krammer PH, Schirrmacher V, Khazaie K. ICE-proteases mediate HTLV-I Tax-induced apoptotic T-cell death. Oncogene. 1997;14(19):2265–2272. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1201070. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Kao SY, Lemoine FJ, Mariott SJ. HTLV-1 Tax protein sensitizes cells to apoptotic cell death induced by DNA damaging agents. Oncogene. 2000;19(18):2240–2248. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1203559. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Nicot C, Harrod R. Distinct p300-responsive mechanisms promote caspase-dependent apoptosis by human T-cell lymphotropic virus type 1 Tax protein. Mol Cell Biol. 2000;20(22):8580–8589. doi: 10.1128/MCB.20.22.8580-8589.2000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Hall AP, Irvine J, Blyth K, Cameron ER, Onions DE, Campbell ME. Tumours derived from HTLV-I tax transgenic mice are characterized by enhanced levels of apoptosis and oncogene expression. J Pathol. 1998;186(2):209–214. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9896(1998100)186:2&#x0003c;209::AID-PATH162&#x0003e;3.0.CO;2-I. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Brauweiler A, Garrus JE, Reed JC, Nyborg JK. Repression of bax gene expression by the HTLV-1 Tax protein: implications for suppression of apoptosis in virally infected cells. Virology. 1997;231(1):135–140. doi: 10.1006/viro.1997.8509. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Tsukahara T, Kannagi M, Ohashi T, Kato H, Arai M, Nunez G, Iwanaga Y, Yamamoto N, Ohtani K, Nakamura M. et al. Induction of Bcl-x(L) expression by human T-cell leukemia virus type 1 Tax through NF-kappaB in apoptosis-resistant T-cell transfectants with Tax. J Virol. 1999;73(10):7981–7987. doi: 10.1128/jvi.73.10.7981-7987.1999. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Kasai T, Jeang KT. Two discrete events, human T-cell leukemia virus type I Tax oncoprotein expression and a separate stress stimulus, are required for induction of apoptosis in T-cells. Retrovirology. 2004;1:7. doi: 10.1186/1742-4690-1-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Sakaue-Sawano A, Kurokawa H, Morimura T, Hanyu A, Hama H, Osawa H, Kashiwagi S, Fukami K, Miyata T, Miyoshi H. et al. Visualizing spatiotemporal dynamics of multicellular cell-cycle progression. Cell. 2008;132(3):487–498. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2007.12.033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Sakaue-Sawano A, Kobayashi T, Ohtawa K, Miyawaki A. Drug-induced cell cycle modulation leading to cell-cycle arrest, nuclear mis-segregation, or endoreplication. BMC Cell Biol. 2011;12:2. doi: 10.1186/1471-2121-12-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Burton M, Upadhyaya CD, Maier B, Hope TJ, Semmes OJ. Human T-cell leukemia virus type 1 Tax shuttles between functionally discrete subcellular targets. J Virol. 2000;74(5):2351–2364. doi: 10.1128/JVI.74.5.2351-2364.2000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Harbour JW, Luo RX, Dei Santi A, Postigo AA, Dean DC. Cdk phosphorylation triggers sequential intramolecular interactions that progressively block Rb functions as cells move through G1. Cell. 1999;98(6):859–869. doi: 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81519-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. de la Fuente C, Wang L, Wang D, Deng L, Wu K, Li H, Stein LD, Denny T, Coffman F, Kehn K. et al. Paradoxical effects of a stress signal on pro- and anti-apoptotic machinery in HTLV-1 Tax expressing cells. Mol Cell Biochem. 2003;245(1–2):99–113. doi: 10.1023/a:1022866027585. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Kawakami A, Nakashima T, Sakai H, Urayama S, Yamasaki S, Hida A, Tsuboi M, Nakamura H, Ida H, Migita K. et al. Inhibition of caspase cascade by HTLV-I tax through induction of NF-kappaB nuclear translocation. Blood. 1999;94(11):3847–3854. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Kuo YL, Giam CZ. Activation of the anaphase promoting complex by HTLV-1 tax leads to senescence. EMBO J. 2006;25(8):1741–1752. doi: 10.1038/sj.emboj.7601054. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Chang HY, Nishitoh H, Yang X, Ichijo H, Baltimore D. Activation of apoptosis signal-regulating kinase 1 (ASK1) by the adapter protein Daxx. Science. 1998;281(5384):1860–1863. doi: 10.1126/science.281.5384.1860. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Chang L, Karin M. Mammalian MAP kinase signalling cascades. Nature. 2001;410(6824):37–40. doi: 10.1038/35065000. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Seoane J, Le HV, Shen L, Anderson SA, Massague J. Integration of Smad and forkhead pathways in the control of neuroepithelial and glioblastoma cell proliferation. Cell. 2004;117(2):211–223. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(04)00298-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Pardali K, Kowanetz M, Heldin CH, Moustakas A. Smad pathway-specific transcriptional regulation of the cell cycle inhibitor p21(WAF1/Cip1) J Cell Physiol. 2005;204(1):260–272. doi: 10.1002/jcp.20304. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Yang Q, Manicone A, Coursen JD, Linke SP, Nagashima M, Forgues M, Wang XW. Identification of a functional domain in a GADD45-mediated G2/M checkpoint. J Biol Chem. 2000;275(47):36892–36898. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M005319200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Jin S, Antinore MJ, Lung FD, Dong X, Zhao H, Fan F, Colchagie AB, Blanck P, Roller PP, Fornace AJ. et al. The GADD45 inhibition of Cdc2 kinase correlates with GADD45-mediated growth suppression. J Biol Chem. 2000;275(22):16602–16608. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M000284200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Smith ML, Chen IT, Zhan Q, Bae I, Chen CY, Gilmer TM, Kastan MB, O'Connor PM, Fornace AJ. Interaction of the p53-regulated protein Gadd45 with proliferating cell nuclear antigen. Science. 1994;266(5189):1376–1380. doi: 10.1126/science.7973727. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Glossop JR, Cartmell SH. Effect of fluid flow-induced shear stress on human mesenchymal stem cells: differential gene expression of IL1B and MAP3K8 in MAPK signaling. Gene Expr Patterns. 2009;9(5):381–388. doi: 10.1016/j.gep.2009.01.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Simonis N, Rual JF, Lemmens I, Boxus M, Hirozane-Kishikawa T, Gatot JS, Dricot A, Hao T, Vertommen D, Legros S. et al. Host-pathogen interactome mapping for HTLV-1 and 2 retroviruses. Retrovirology. 2012;9(1):26. doi: 10.1186/1742-4690-9-26. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Ng PW, Iha H, Iwanaga Y, Bittner M, Chen Y, Jiang Y, Gooden G, Trent JM, Meltzer P, Jeang KT. et al. Genome-wide expression changes induced by HTLV-1 Tax: evidence for MLK-3 mixed lineage kinase involvement in Tax-mediated NF-kappaB activation. Oncogene. 2001;20(33):4484–4496. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1204513. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Seoane J. p21(WAF1/CIP1) at the switch between the anti-oncogenic and oncogenic faces of TGFbeta. Cancer Biol Ther. 2004;3(2):226–227. doi: 10.4161/cbt.3.2.717. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Kehn K, Deng L, de la Fuente C, Strouss K, Wu K, Maddukuri A, Baylor S, Rufner R, Pumfery A, Bottazzi ME. et al. The role of cyclin D2 and p21/waf1 in human T-cell leukemia virus type 1 infected cells. Retrovirology. 2004;1:6. doi: 10.1186/1742-4690-1-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Helt AM, Galloway DA. Mechanisms by which DNA tumor virus oncoproteins target the Rb family of pocket proteins. Carcinogenesis. 2003;24(2):159–169. doi: 10.1093/carcin/24.2.159. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Dean J, Hashimoto K, Tsuji T, Gautier V, Hall WW, Sheehy N. Functional interaction of HTLV-1 tax protein with the POZ domain of the transcriptional repressor BCL6. Oncogene. 2009;28(42):3723–3734. doi: 10.1038/onc.2009.230. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Zane L, Sibon D, Jeannin L, Zandecki M, Delfau-Larue MH, Gessain A, Gout O, Pinatel C, Lancon A, Mortreux F. et al. Tax gene expression and cell cycling but not cell death are selected during HTLV-1 infection in vivo. Retrovirology. 2010;7:17. doi: 10.1186/1742-4690-7-17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Zhao TM, Robinson MA, Bowers FS, Kindt TJ. Characterization of an infectious molecular clone of human T-cell leukemia virus type I. J Virol. 1995;69(4):2024–2030. doi: 10.1128/jvi.69.4.2024-2030.1995. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Niwa H, Yamamura K, Miyazaki J. Efficient selection for high-expression transfectants with a novel eukaryotic vector. Gene. 1991;108(2):193–199. doi: 10.1016/0378-1119(91)90434-D. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Cormack BP, Valdivia RH, Falkow S. FACS-optimized mutants of the green fluorescent protein (GFP) Gene. 1996;173(1 Spec No):33–38. doi: 10.1016/0378-1119(95)00685-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Tajima S, Aida Y. The region between amino acids 245 and 265 of the bovine leukemia virus (BLV) tax protein restricts transactivation not only via the BLV enhancer but also via other retrovirus enhancers. J Virol. 2000;74(23):10939–10949. doi: 10.1128/JVI.74.23.10939-10949.2000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Tajima S, Zhuang WZ, Kato MV, Okada K, Ikawa Y, Aida Y. Function and conformation of wild-type p53 protein are influenced by mutations in bovine leukemia virus-induced B-cell lymphosarcoma. Virology. 1998;243(1):735–746. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from BMC Genomics are provided here courtesy of BMC

RESOURCES