Abstract
Background and aim
Several studies have highlighted the association of the 12q13.3–12q14.1 region with coeliac disease, type 1 diabetes, rheumatoid arthritis and multiple sclerosis (MS); however, the causal variants underlying diseases are still unclear. The authors sought to identify the functional variant of this region associated with MS.
Methods
Tag-single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) analysis of the associated region encoding 15 genes was performed in 2876 MS patients and 2910 healthy Caucasian controls together with expression regulation analyses.
Results
rs6581155, which tagged 18 variants within a region where 9 genes map, was sufficient to model the association. This SNP was in total linkage disequilibrium (LD) with other polymorphisms that associated with the expression levels of FAM119B, AVIL, TSFM, TSPAN31 and CYP27B1 genes in different expression quantitative trait loci studies. Functional annotations from Encyclopedia of DNA Elements (ENCODE) showed that six out of these rs6581155-tagged-SNPs were located in regions with regulatory potential and only one of them, rs10877013, exhibited allele-dependent (ratio A/G=9.5-fold) and orientation-dependent (forward/reverse=2.7-fold) enhancer activity as determined by luciferase reporter assays. This enhancer is located in a region where a long-range chromatin interaction among the promoters and promoter-enhancer of several genes has been described, possibly affecting their expression simultaneously.
Conclusions
This study determines a functional variant which alters the enhancer activity of a regulatory element in the locus affecting the expression of several genes and explains the association of the 12q13.3–12q14.1 region with MS.
Keywords: Genome-wide, Multiple sclerosis
Introduction
Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic autoimmune disease with a complex pathogenesis in which demyelination and neurodegeneration are the main contributors to disability.1 Susceptibility to MS is thought to be conferred by a combination of genetic and environmental factors.2 The best characterised region implicated in predisposition to MS is the Major Histocompatibility Complex on chromosome 6p21, specifically the HLA-DRB1* 15:01 class II allele, but this accounts for less than 50% of MS heritability.3 New powerful methods as gene expression profiling and genome-wide association study (GWAS) have provided evidence for new susceptibility loci implicated in MS.4–6 These comprise over 40 loci including IL2RA, CBLB, IL7R, CLEC16A, TNFRSF1A, PTGER4 and IRF8.7–9
For many risk loci, the association signals do not directly implicate a single gene and the causative role for candidate genes in the region can only be speculated. A striking number of loci have demonstrated genome-wide evidence for association in multiple, distinct autoimmune disorders.10 11 One of these loci is 12q13–14 which has been associated in GWAS for rheumatoid arthritis (RA), coeliac disease (CD) and MS.8 12–14 However, different genes have been suggested in each study based on the main associated signal. A meta-analysis of two published GWAS totalling 3393 RA cases and 12 462 healthy controls identified an association at rs1678542 localised in the KIF5A intronic region.13 Another meta-analysis of two published GWAS on CD (4533 cases and 10 750 controls) and RA (5539 cases and 17 231 controls) described the association of both diseases at rs10876993 localised in the intergenic region between B4GALNT1 and OS9 genes.14 Association at this locus was also described in a MS GWAS performed by the Australian and New Zealand Multiple Sclerosis Genetics Consortium in 1618 MS-cases. In this case, an associated single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) (rs703842) was located at the 3' untranslated region (3' UTR) of the METTL1 gene.12 The last GWAS performed by the International Multiple Sclerosis Genetics Consortium with 10 000 MS patients also reported the association with this region at rs12368653 in theAGAP2 gene.8 In candidate gene studies, the KIF5A variant was demonstrated to be associated to MS15 and type 1 diabetes.16 Also rare variants in the CYP27B1 gene have been associated with MS.17 Other candidate-gene studies had demonstrated association of variants located at the CYP27B1 gene with type 1 diabetes18 and MS.19
The FAM119B gene has been pinpointed as the causal gene of the locus since its expression has been shown to be much lower in leukocytes of MS patients carrying the MS risk allele.20 On the other hand, since, in several studies, MS patients have lower levels of precursors of vitamin D in serum compared with controls, it has been suggested that CYP27B1, an enzyme implicated in Vitamin D activation, may be the causal gene.19
In this work we performed a fine mapping of the 12q13.3–12q14.1 region by a Tag-SNP approach to identify the polymorphism leading the association with MS. We also performed functional studies to determine the involvement of the associated MS risk variants in gene expression.
Material and methods
Study subjects and SNP genotyping
The entire data set studied consisted of 2876 MS patients diagnosed following Poser's criteria21 and 2910 age and gender matched healthy controls, mostly blood donors and staff, matched by age, gender, ethnicity and place of recruitment. Patients and control subjects were included in the study based upon written informed consent. Demographic and clinical characteristics of the sample collections have been published before15 22 (a summary is in the online supplementary table S1). SNPs were genotyped using the iPLEX Sequenom MassARRAY platform in the Spanish National Genotyping Center's facilities at Santiago de Compostela University (http://www.cegen.org). All DNAs ware received in the Centro Nacional de Genotipado (CEGEN) centre for genotyping in 96-well plates; the concentration of double-stranded DNA was assessed using PicoGreen (Molecular Probes). As quality control, two trios of Center for the Study of Human Polymorphisms (CEPH) samples were genotyped (CEPH Na10830, Na10831, Na12147, Na10860, Na10861, Na11984). The genotypes of these samples corresponded with the ones deposited in HapMap with no detection of Mendelian inconsistencies. Additionally, a 10% of random samples were subjected to regenotyping. The resulting data were concordant with an average accuracy over 99.9%. We performed quality filtering of both samples and SNPs to ensure robust association testing.
Ethics statement
All participants provided a written informed consent to participate in this study, which was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Hospital Regional Universitario Carlos Haya of Malaga, Hospital Clinic of Barcelona, Hospital Virgen Macarena of Sevilla, Hospital de Basurto of Bilbao, Hospital Clínico San Carlos of Madrid, Hospital Universitari Vall d´Hebron of Barcelona and Hospital Donostia of San Sebastian.
Luciferase assays
Six fragments in both orientations with potential regulatory activity, as indicated by ENCODE, containing the tagged variants, 24 inserts in total, plus a plasmid without insert, were assayed for luciferase activity. Thus, fragments I–VI were PCR amplified (the coordinates and the primer used are indicated in online supplementary table S2) using DNA from homozygous individual for each allele of rs6581155. The fragments were previously cloned in Vaccinia DNA Topoisomerase I (TOPO) T/A vector (Invitrogen) and sequenced. Then, each clone was introduced in forward and reverse orientation in pGL4.25 (luc2CP/minP) vector which contains a minimal promoter upstream of the luciferase reporter gene luc2CP. Triplicates were transfected into human Raji cells (ATCC CCL86). The Raji cell line was maintained in Roswell Park Memorial Institute (RPMI) 1640 medium, supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum, 2.0 mM glutamine, 10 mM 4-(2-hydroxyethyl)-1-piperazineethanesulfonic acid (HEPES), 1 mM streptomycin, 100 U/ml penicillin, 0.05 mM 2-mercaptoethanol. Exponentially growing cells were transfected by nucleofection Amaxa Cell Line Nucleofector Kit V (Lonza) according to manufacture protocols. Briefly, Raji cells (2×106) were mixed with I–VI plasmid constructs or pGL4.25 control plasmid 2 μg of DNA and 0.2 μg of DNA of Renilla luciferase reporter gene plasmid pRL-TK(Promega) for normalising transfection efficiency. The transfected cells were cultured in 12 well-plates for 24 h. Cells were harvested and washed twice in Phosphate Buffered Saline (PBS) at 4°C. Luciferase activity was evaluated using Dual-Luciferase Assay System (Promega) according to manufacturers. For analysis, lysates were thawed on ice and the protein concentration was measured by the Bradford method. Then, 40 μg of protein from all supernatants were analysed for both firefly and Renilla luciferase activities in a luminometer F12 (Berthold Detection Systems). The following equation was used to determine the normalised fold changes in activity between tested groups:
The normalised fold changes in activity from each of the three experiments are then averaged together.
Statistical analysis
Departure from Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium for all the biallelic SNP markers was tested using an exact test.23 Raw data were analysed for comparison of allele and genotype counts using PLINK V.1.05. To avoid false-positive results due to multiple testing and considering that the SNPs analysed are not in complete disequilibrium, we applied the Benjamini-Hochberg method24 that is robust against positive dependence and controls the false discovery rate.25 In order to determine the effect and independence of variant association with MS, multiple logistic regression models were computed. Linkage disequilibrium (LD) patterns between SNPs were analysed with Haploview 4.2.26 Gender was analysed for potential differential risk contribution. We used the Breslow-Day Test to evaluate the homogeneity between gender cohorts. The age of onset with respect to the genotypes was analysed by the Kruskal-Wallis test.
Results
A tag-SNP association study of the region
We performed the fine mapping of the 12q13.3–12q14.1 region between coordinates 56227468 to 56469005 (B36) (figure 1). To analyse this region, 16 SNPs were chosen by pairwise tagging from the HapMap B36 Utah residents with Northern and Western European ancestry from the CEPH collection (CEU) population which captured 89 markers with r2≥0.8 (mean r2=0.93) and a minor-allele frequency ≥0.1. These tag-SNPs captured the variants associated with RA, MS and CD previously reported in different GWAS (see online supplementary table S3).
Tag-SNPs were genotyped in 2895 MS patients and 2942 healthy controls, mostly blood donors, matched by age, gender, ethnicity and place of recruitment. The genotypic distribution between cases and controls is shown in table 1. The genotype frequencies were fitted to an additive model. The top associated SNP was rs6581155 (p=4.57E−7; OR=0.79; 95% CI 0.73 to 0.87). We performed a logistic regression analysis to determine the effect of further independent variants, by testing the addition of each SNP to rs6581155 and by adding this polymorphism to each one of the other Tag-SNPs (table 2). The results showed that, in addition to generate the strongest signal, rs6581155 alone was sufficient to model the association in the locus.
Table 1.
SNP | Alleles | Multiple sclerosis | Healthy controls | Allelic p value | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 2 | 11 | 12 | 22 | 11 | 12 | 22 | Uncorrected | Benjamini-Hochberg Adjusted |
Per allele OR (95% CI) | |
rs1678542 | C | G | 248 (9) | 1149 (41.7) | 1361 (49.3) | 318 (11.2) | 1229 (43.3) | 1291 (45.5) | 0.0005 | 0.0017 | 0.87 (0.8 to 0.94) |
rs2888334 | C | G | 134 (4.7) | 946 (33.2) | 1770 (62.1) | 166 (5.7) | 1030 (36.9) | 1676 (58.4) | 0.002 | 0.004 | 0.87 (0.8 to 0.95) |
rs775249 | T | C | 181 (6.4) | 1047 (36.8) | 1619 (56.9) | 181 (6.3) | 1100 (38.2) | 1601 (55.5) | 0.44 | 0.51 | 0.97 (0.89 to 1.05) |
rs1678536 | G | C | 129 (4.5) | 922 (32.4) | 1796 (63.1) | 163 (5.7) | 1013 (35.2) | 1701 (59.1) | 0.001 | 0.0023 | 0.86 (0.79 to 0.94) |
rs7313599 | G | A | 752 (26.4) | 1399 (49.1) | 696 (24.5) | 660 (23) | 1430 (49.7) | 784 (27.3) | 0.0008 | 0.0021 | 1.13 (1.05 to 1.22) |
rs1078109 | A | G | 6 (0.2) | 366 (12.9) | 2472 (86.9) | 8 (0.28) | 306 (10.6) | 2568 (89.1) | 0.018 | 0.026 | 1.2 (1.03 to 1.4) |
rs7305391 | A | G | 128 (4.5) | 908 (31.9) | 1813 (63.6) | 119 (4.1) | 967 (33.6) | 1792 (62.3) | 0.5 | 0.537 | 0.97 (0.89 to 1.06) |
rs1564374 | G | A | 477 (17.2) | 1383 (49.9) | 909 (32.8) | 570 (20.9) | 1349 (49.4) | 812 (29.7) | 0.00037 | 0.0015 | 0.87 (0.81 to 0.94) |
rs11172290 | G | A | 58 (2) | 735 (25.8) | 2052 (72.1) | 73 (2.5) | 726 (25.2) | 2082 (72.2) | 0.79 | 0.79 | 0.99 (0.89 to 1.09) |
rs3825078 | A | T | 176 (6.2) | 1115 (39.1) | 1558 (54.7) | 238 (8.2) | 1149 (40) | 1497 (51.9) | 0.003 | 0.006 | 0.88 (0.81 to 0.96) |
rs701006 | A | G | 222 (7.8) | 1225 (43) | 1403 (49.2) | 318 (11) | 1266 (44) | 1295 (45) | 0.000014 | 0.00008 | 0.84 (0.78 to 0.91) |
rs2301551 | G | C | 76 (2.7) | 867 (30.5) | 1897 (66.8) | 130 (4.5) | 967 (33.7) | 1769 (61.7) | 3.22E−6 | 0.00003 | 0.8 (0.73 to 0.88) |
rs12307841 | C | T | 26 (0.9) | 518 (18.1) | 2311 (80.9) | 28 (0.97) | 469 (16.3) | 2386 (82.7) | 0.1097 | 0.15 | 1.11 (0.98 to 1.25) |
rs12368653 | G | A | 430 (15.1) | 1403 (49.2) | 1016 (35.7) | 502 (17.5) | 1413 (49.2) | 955 (33.3) | 0.009 | 0.015 | 0.91 (0.84 to 0.98) |
rs1048691 | T | C | 135 (4.8) | 958 (33.8) | 1738 (61.4) | 127 (4.4) | 940 (32.7) | 1805 (62.8) | 0.24 | 0.29 | 1.06 (0.96 to 1.15) |
rs6581155 | G | A | 110 (4) | 909 (32.7) | 1757 (63.3) | 173 (6.2) | 1002 (36.2) | 1596 (57.6) | 4.57E−7 | 7.3E−6 | 0.79 (0.73 to 0.87) |
Counts (percentages in brackets) are represented for each genotype.
Table 2.
SNP | A1 | *Add locus to rs6581155 | †Add rs6581155 to locus | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
p | OR (95% CI) | p | OR (95% CI) | ||
rs1678542 | C | 0.2223 | 0.94 (0.86 to 1.04) | 0.0001393 | 0.82 (0.74 to 0.91) |
rs2888334 | C | 0.8487 | 0.99 (0.89 to 1.1) | 0.0001001 | 0.8 (0.72 to 0.9) |
rs775249 | T | 0.1719 | 0.94 (0.86 to 1.03) | 3.99E−07 | 0.79 (0.72 to 0.87) |
rs1678536 | G | 0.7964 | 0.99 (0.88 to 1.1) | 9.86E−05 | 0.8 (0.72 to 0.9) |
rs7313599 | G | 0.1479 | 1.06 (0.98 to 1.15) | 6.20E−05 | 0.82 (0.74 to 0.9) |
rs1078109 | A | 0.09391 | 1.15 (0.98 to 1.35) | 1.42E−06 | 0.8 (0.73 to 0.88) |
rs7305391 | A | 0.2615 | 0.95 (0.87 to 1.04) | 6.29E−07 | 0.8 (0.73 to 0.87) |
rs1564374 | G | 0.2487 | 0.95 (0.86 to 1.04) | 0.000759 | 0.83 (0.74 to 0.93) |
rs11172290 | G | 0.634 | 0.98 (0.88 to 1.08) | 4.10E−07 | 0.79 (0.73 to 0.87) |
rs3825078 | A | 0.589 | 1.03 (0.93 to 1.14) | 1.36E−05 | 0.78 (0.7 to 0.87) |
rs701006 | A | 0.4727 | 0.96 (0.85 to 1.08) | 0.003056 | 0.82 (0.72 to 0.94) |
rs2301551 | G | 0.1587 | 0.88 (0.75 to 1.05) | 0.1069 | 0.88 (0.75 to 1.03) |
rs12307841 | C | 0.6206 | 1.03 (0.91 to 1.17) | 1.23E−06 | 0.8 (0.73 to 0.87) |
rs12368653 | G | 0.5573 | 1.03 (0.93 to 1.14) | 1.74E−05 | 0.78 (0.69 to 0.87) |
rs1048691 | T | 0.795 | 1.01 (0.92 to 1.11) | 1.80E−06 | 0.8 (0.72 to 0.87) |
rs6581155 | G | NA | NA | NA | NA |
Results for models assuming additive effects.
*Denotes results adjusted for rs6581155.
†Denotes results adjusted for locus tested.
NA, not applicable.
Stratification by gender and age at onset and genotypes of rs6581155 SNP showed absence of statistical significance.
Moreover, we genotyped the rare variant rs118204009 located in the CYP27B gene that has been recently associated with MS in a subgroup of 1006 patients and 1044 healthy controls.17 We did not detect this polymorphism in any individual of the MS or control groups (data not shown).
Association of rs6581155-tagged SNPs with gene transcription levels
To determine if selected Tag-SNPs could have a functional effect on the transcription levels of the genes located in the 12q13.3–12q141 region, we first used expression quantitative trait loci (eQTL) data from Zeller et al27 obtained from monocyte samples of 1490 German individuals (http://genecanvas.ecgene.net/news.php?readmore=45). There were 23 eQTLs for FAM119B, 6 for AVIL, 18 for XRCC6BP1, 18 for TSFM and 20 for TSPAN31 genes in the whole region. The variants best correlated with expression of FAM119B, AVIL, TSFM and TSPAN31were also SNPs tagged by rs6581155 and, therefore, in high LD with it (r2>0.8) (table 3). The eQTLs for the XRCC6BP gene were in low LD with rs6581155 (r2=0.18) indicating that they were not involved in MS risk. Interestingly, the minor alleles for the rs6581155-tagged SNPs, which were protective for MS, correlated with high expression of FAM119B and AVIL but low expression of TSFM and TSPAN31 (see online supplementary figure S1) although there were large differences between the correlation coefficients obtained for each gene. FAM119B was the gene most strongly correlated with the rs6581155-tagged SNPs in monocytes.
Table 3.
Study | Zeller et al27 | Dixon et al28 | Montgomery et al29 | Stranger et al30 | Dimas et al31 | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Population | 1490 German individuals | 206 families of British descent | 60 CEU individuals of the HapMap collection | 60 individuals of the HapMap collection CEU | 80 individuals of Western European origin | ||||||||
Gene | AVIL | XRCC6BP1 | TSFM | FAM119B | TSPAN31 | FAM119B | TSFM | CYP27B1 | FAM119B | FAM119B | FAM119B | FAM119B | FAM119B |
Cell type | Monocytes | LCL | LCL | LCL | T-cells | LCL | Fibroblasts | ||||||
Probe/Transcript | ILMN_20148 | ILMN_16915 | ILMN_27946 | ILMN_12426 | ILMN_11441 | 213861_s_at | 212656_at | ENST00000228606 | ENST00000300209 | GI_24308058-S | ILMN_1723846 | ILMN_1723846 | ILMN_1723846 |
p Value/effect | p Value/effect | p Value/effect | p Value/effect | p Value | |||||||||
SNP | |||||||||||||
rs6581155 | 2.1E−10/−0.57 | ||||||||||||
rs10747783 | 5.00E−21/−0.731 | 9.00E−13/0.564 | 7.5E−11/−0.58 | ||||||||||
rs923829 | 5.00E−21/−0.731 | 9.00E−13/0.564 | 6E−11/−0.58 | ||||||||||
rs10431552 | 2.80E−21/−0.745 | 1.00E−12/0.569 | 2.1E−10/−0.57 | ||||||||||
rs2072052 | 7.70E−19/−689 | 1.00E−13/0.588 | 5E−10/−0.56 | ||||||||||
rs2291617 | 4.10E−11/−0.62 | 7.60E−11/0.626 | 6E−11/−0.58 | ||||||||||
rs4646536 | 1.7E−07/−0.021 | 5E−38/0.11 | 7.71E−19/0.055 | 3.34E−236/−0.52 | 1.4E−11/0.033 | 2.1E−10/−0.57 | |||||||
rs724834 | 6E−11/−0.58 | ||||||||||||
rs2069502 | 1.84E−08/−0.024 | 4.4E−38/0.11 | 6.19E−17/0.049 | 7.78E−221/−0.5 | 2.29E−12/0.036 | 7.7E−19/−0.689 | 1.40E−13/0.583 | 5.3E−10/−0.56 | |||||
rs10877013 | 8.80E−20/−0.711 | 1.80E−12/0.56 | 4.1E−10/−0.56 | 0.000012/−0.481 | 0.000292/−0.407 | 0.0000001/−0.571 | |||||||
rs10877011 | 8.90E−14/−0.612 | 9.00E−13/0.6 | 0.00014157/−0.472 | 0.00013264/−0.474 | 9.5E−11/−0.57 | ||||||||
rs701008 | 2.30E−12/−0.563 | 2.30E−11/0.55 | 1.6E−8/−0.51 | ||||||||||
rs8181644 | 1.2E−07/−0.022 | 3.8E−38/0.11 | 1.4E−19/0.057 | 3.9E−234/−0.52 | 5.5E−12/0.034 | 2.1E−10/−0.57 | |||||||
rs10877019 | 4.2E−07/−0.023 | 6.31E−38/0.11 | 1.024E−190.058 | 8.32E−233/−0.52 | 1.52E−11/0.034 | 2.1E−10/−0.57 | |||||||
rs11172335 | 2.1E−10/−0.57 | ||||||||||||
rs703842 | 1.67E−07/−0.021 | 2.42E−37/0.11 | 1.42E−18/0.054 | 7.5E−235/−0.52 | 1.41E−11/0.037 | 7.80E−17/−0.694 | 2.50E−11/0.568 | 2.1E−10/−0.57 | |||||
rs10877015 | 2.1E−10/−0.57 | ||||||||||||
rs11172333 | 1.11E−07/−0.023 | 7.31E−39/0.11 | 1.74E−19/0.057 | 2.07E−233/−0.51 | 5.63E−12/0.035 | 2.1E−10/−0.57 |
Zeller et al Genome-Wide Expression analysis performed with Illumina HT-12 v3 BeadChip. Association significance was obtained by ANalysis Of VAriance (ANOVA).
Dixon et al Genome-Wide Expression analysis performed by U133 Plus 2.0 GeneChips (Affymetrix). Association analysis was obtained by fitting a simple regression model to each trait and used a variance component approach to account for correlation between different observed phenotypes within each family.
Montgomery et al Genome-Wide Expression analysis performed by RNA sequencing in an Illumina GAII. Association analysis and multiple testing corrections were conducted by spearman rank correlation and permuting the expression phenotype 10 000 times and summarising the extreme p value distribution for each particular exon, transcript and probe.
Stranger et al Genome-Wide Expression analysis performed with Sentrix Human-6 Expression BeadChip V.1, Illumina. Association significance was obtained by spearman rank correlation with 10 000 permutations of the expression phenotypes.
Dimas et al Gene expression was performed by commercial whole-genome expression array (WG-6 V.3 Expression BeadChip, Illumina). Association analysis and multiple testing corrections were conducted by spearman rank correlation. Thresholds for each gene were assigned after 10 000 permutations of expression values relative to genotypes where the haplotypic (LD) structure was maintained in each interaction.
eQTL, expression quantitative trait loci; LCL, lymphoblastic cell lines.
The eQTL data from Dixon et al28 obtained in lymphoblastic cell lines (LCL) from 206 families of British descent confirmed the eQTLs previously observed for FAM119B and TSFM, although the correlation coefficients were similar for both genes in contrast to the data from Zeller et al.27 The eQTLs for FAM119B were also reported in three additional data sets carried out in different cell types, as shown in table 3.
The data from Montgomery et al,29 obtained by RNA-Seq from LCL of 60 HapMap CEU individuals, have reported a rs6581155-tagged SNP to be eQTLs for FAM119B and CYP27B1, in which the minor allele inversely correlated with high expression of these genes (correlation coefficient (r) for CYP27B1=−0.472, and for FAM119B=−0.474).
Enhancer activity
Since all the rs6581155-tagged polymorphisms were located in intronic and intergenic non-coding regions, another strategy to search for functionality was to use annotations of gene regulatory regions from ENCODE (http://genome.ucsc.edu/cgi-bin/hgTrackUi?hgsid=173506627&c=chr8&g=wgEncodeReg). Six out of 18 captured SNPs were located in remarkable regions associated with histone methylation, binding sites of transcription factors or in DNAse I hypersensitive site as shown in figure 2A.
To test their potential activities as enhancers or repressors of gene expression, we cloned the fragments containing these six variants upstream of the basic promoter of a luciferase reporter system and transfected into Raji lymphoblastic B cells.
We cloned four inserts for each of the six regions carrying both alleles in forward and reverse orientation. Only region III containing variant SNP rs10877013 had allele-dependent and orientation-dependent enhancer activity. Thus, allele A versus allele G in forward orientation showed 9.5-fold higher ratio of luciferase activity (figure 2B). We observed a 2.7 times higher enhancer activity of the T allele in the reverse fragment.
TFSEARCH, Match and TESS software were used to predict potential transcription factor binding sites that could be responsible of the different allele-depending activity of fragment III. The SNP rs10877013 falls within the putative binding sites for the CCAAT/enhancer binding proteins (C/EBP) α and β. Although both alleles appear to be consistent with the consensus sequence for C/EBP TF it is possible that a base change could affect the affinity or isotype binding of the C/EBP transcription factor to the sequence.
Discussion
The 12q13.3–12q14.1 region has been associated to several autoimmune diseases8 12–16 but no causal variant has been found so far for any of them exception made for a rare variant in the coding region of CYP27B1 gene associated with MS.17 This variant was not detected in our sample set.
In the present work, by integrating several strategies, we have uncovered the variant most strongly associated with MS in the region. This variant also affects the activity of an enhancer in an allele-dependent and orientation-dependent manner and correlates with the expression of five genes of the locus. Interestingly, the major allele of this SNP (rs10877013) correlates with high luciferase activity and at the same time with high expression of TSFM and TSPAN31 and low expression of FAM119B, CYP27B1 and AVIL. Although it could seem contradictory that one enhancer may differentially affect the expression of different genes, parallel situations have been described extensively in two scenarios: first, the same transcription factor is capable of activating or repressing depending on the context;32 33 second, a single DNA sequence can be bound by different factors with opposite activities.34 On the other hand, we cannot forget the important role of H3K4me preventing aberrant gene expression or modulating transcriptional response. H3K4me turns to mark for both positive and negative regulation. The role of H3K4me2 in histones deacetylation could serve as a fine-tuning regulatory mechanism.35
It has been described that interacting promotes are coexpressed in a tissue-specific manner. Based on the Chromatin Interaction Analysis with Paired-End-Tag sequencing results mapping long-range chromatin interactions associated with RNAPII and H3K4me2,36 37 we observed that the genes in the analysed region are engaged through promoter–promoter, promoter–enhancer interactions forming a multigene complex that could provide a structural framework for cotranscription (figure 3). In this sense, the effect of a polymorphism on one enhancer embedded in this multigene complex could have diverging effects depending on the interaction of this enhancer with the different promoters. Additionally, the interactions could be tissue-type or cell-type specific, as has been shown by Li et al.36 Therefore, it is not evident which of the genes in the region may be responsible for the genetic association with MS, since they seem to be coordinately regulated, and the enhancer containing the MS-associated variant may be affecting either of them; in fact, it acts as an eQTL for all of them. We observed that the Spearman's correlation coefficients (r) between the expression levels of the different genes in this cluster and the rs6581155-tagged SNPs were different in the different assays performed. For instance, in monocytes the best correlation is observed with FAM119B (r=−0.52), however in data obtained from LCL by RNA-seq a medium-high correlation coefficient is found for both CYP27B1 (r=−0.472) and FAM119B (r=−0.474), and with microarrays the correlation coefficient is very similar for TSFM and FAM119B. Based on data from LCL cells, TSFM, FAM119B or CYP27B1 would be candidates, while FAM119B appears to emerge from monocytes. In fact, Gandhi et al20 reported that FAM119B expression level was much lower in MS patients carrying the susceptibility haplotype. We observed that this correlation occurs also in samples from healthy donors as they are the CEU HapMap samples. However, we do not know the precise conditions (cell type, stage of disease, etc) under which expression of these genes could be determinant for the development of MS. For the same reason the variant-specific enhancer activity of fragment III, reported in this work, could vary in different cell-types. Here we have used in the activity assays the same cell-type used in the eQTL analysis to reproduce the effect observed in the expression of these genes. The Raji cells are lymphoblast-like cells derived from B-lymphocyte as the LCL from HapMap. The effect of the enhancer on the gene expression of proximal tubule cells of the kidney and the disease-activated macrophages, which are the major source of CYP27B1,38 could shed light on the involvement of this variant in MS.
Relying on published data from other groups on the concentration of precursors of vitamin D in serum, two independent groups reported a correlation between the major alleles of rs703842, tagged by rs6581155 in the present work, with high 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25(OH)D) concentrations in MS patients.39 40 On the other hand, Lange et al41 reported a correlation of the major allele of rs10877012, in total LD with rs6581155, and low 1,25(OH)2D serum levels. The major allele of the MS-associated SNPs, in total LD with the previously mentioned SNPs, correlated with low expression of the CYP27B1 gene. This enzyme catalyses the conversion of 25(OH)D to 1,25(OH)2D, thus a low expression of this enzyme, could reconcile the above seemingly conflicting data, via accumulation of 25(OH)D and a low 1,25(OH)2D product. These data support the CYP27B1 gene as a very plausible candidate gene for association of the region with MS.
Vitamin D, besides having well-known control functions of calcium and phosphorus metabolism, bone formation and mineralisation, also has a complex role in the maintenance of immune homeostasis. The administration of vitamin D in animal models leads to improvement of immune-mediated symptoms. The correlation between the MS- associated variants and circulating levels of vitamin D supports the important role of vitamin D in susceptibility to MS. Thus, if this is the case in human MS, both the pharmacogenomics and the expression analysis of all the genes affecting the causing factor can reveal the kind of intervention necessary for neutralising a pathogenic situation.42
In this work we localise a group of variants in almost total LD that explain the association of the 12q13.3–12q14.1 region with MS. One of these variants (rs10877013) strongly affects the activity of one enhancer in the region, in an allele-dependent and orientation-dependent way, that could be the cause of the alteration of TSFM, TSPAN31, FAM119B, CYP27B1 and AVIL gene expression, due to the promoter multigene interactions observed in the region. Some of the tagged variants have been described to be associated with the vitamin D serum concentration. Our results point to one of these as the causal gene for MS association in the locus.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments
We thank patients with multiple sclerosis and control subjects for making this study feasible. SNP genotyping services were provided by the Spanish Centro Nacional de Genotipado CEGEN-USC (http://www.cegen.org).
Footnotes
Contributors: AA, EU, KV and FM designed the study, performed the main statistical analyses and co-wrote the manuscript. MF carried part of the experiments. OF, AS, GI, ML, LL, JAGL, IA, AA, MJGB, JV, BH, RA, MC, XM, DO, JO, YB coordinated sample collection. MAA, NPM, AN carried out some bioinformatics analysis.
Funding: Financial support for the study was provided by Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad (MINECO)-Fondos Europeos de Desarrollo Regional (FEDER) (grant number SAF2009-11491); Fondo de Investigación Sanitaria (FIS) (grant numbers RETICS-REEM RD07/0060, CP 10/00526, PI10/1985, PS09/02105); Junta de Andalucía- Fondos Europeos de Desarrollo Regional (FEDER) (grant numbers P07-CVI-02551, P09-CTS-5218); Ikerbasque; the Basque Foundation for Science (Bilbao) and Fundación Ilundain.
Competing interests: None.
Patient consent: Obtained.
Ethics approval: This study was approved by the Institutional Review Boards of Hospital Regional Universitario Carlos Haya of Malaga, Hospital Clinic of Barcelona, Hospital Virgen Macarena of Sevilla, Hospital de Basurto of Bilbao, Hospital Clínico San Carlos of Madrid, Hospital Universitari Vall d´Hebron of Barcelona and Hospital Donostia of San Sebastian.
Provenance and peer review: Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
Data sharing statement: The data presented in the manuscript are available on request.
Open Access: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 3.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/
References
- 1.Hauser SL, Oksenberg JR. The neurobiology of multiple sclerosis: genes, inflammation, and neurodegeneration. Neuron 2009;52:61–76 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.McElroy JP, Oksenberg JR. Multiple sclerosis genetics. Curr Top Microbiol Immunol 2008;318:45–72 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Ramagopalan SV, Knight JC, Ebers GC. Multiple sclerosis and the major histocompatibility complex. Curr Opin Neurol 2009;22:219–25 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Manolio TA, Collins FS, Cox NJ, Goldstein DB, Hindorff LA, Hunter DJ, McCarthy MI, Ramos EM, Cardon LR, Chakravarti A, Cho JH, Guttmacher AE, Kong A, Kruglyak L, Mardis E, Rotimi CN, Slatkin M, Valle D, Whittemore AS, Boehnke M, Clark AG, Eichler EE, Gibson G, Haines JL, Mackay TF, McCarroll SA, Visscher PM. Finding the missing heritability of complex diseases. Nature 2009;461:747–53 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Bomprezzi R, Kovanen PE, Martin R. New approaches to investigating heterogeneity in complex traits. J Med Genet 2003;40:553–9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Fierabracci A, Milillo A, Locatelli F, Fruci D. The putative role of endoplasmic reticulum aminopeptidases in autoimmunity: insights from genomic-wide association studies. Autoimmun Rev. Published Online First: May 2012 doi:10.1016/j.autrev.2012.04.007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Corrado L, Bergamaschi L, Barizzone N, Fasano ME, Guerini FR, Salvetti M, Galimberti D, Benedetti MD, Leone M, D'Alfonso S. Association of the CBLB gene with multiple sclerosis: new evidence from a replication study in an Italian population. J Med Genet 2011;48:210–11 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.International Multiple Sclerosis Genetics Consortium; Wellcome Trust Case Control Consortium 2, Sawcer S, Hellenthal G, Pirinen M, Spencer CC, Patsopoulos NA, Moutsianas L, Dilthey A, Su Z, Freeman C, Hunt SE, Edkins S, Gray E, Booth DR, Potter SC, Goris A, Band G, Oturai AB, Strange A, Saarela J, Bellenguez C, Fontaine B, Gillman M, Hemmer B, Gwilliam R, Zipp F, Jayakumar A, Martin R, Leslie S, Hawkins S, Giannoulatou E, D'alfonso S, Blackburn H, Martinelli Boneschi F, Liddle J, Harbo HF, Perez ML, Spurkland A, Waller MJ, Mycko MP, Ricketts M, Comabella M, Hammond N, Kockum I, McCann OT, Ban M, Whittaker P, Kemppinen A, Weston P, Hawkins C, Widaa S, Zajicek J, Dronov S, Robertson N, Bumpstead SJ, Barcellos LF, Ravindrarajah R, Abraham R, Alfredsson L, Ardlie K, Aubin C, Baker A, Baker K, Baranzini SE, Bergamaschi L, Bergamaschi R, Bernstein A, Berthele A, Boggild M, Bradfield JP, Brassat D, Broadley SA, Buck D, Butzkueven H, Capra R, Carroll WM, Cavalla P, Celius EG, Cepok S, Chiavacci R, Clerget-Darpoux F, Clysters K, Comi G, Cossburn M, Cournu-Rebeix I, Cox MB, Cozen W, Cree BA, Cross AH, Cusi D, Daly MJ, Davis E, de Bakker PI, Debouverie M, D'hooghe MB, Dixon K, Dobosi R, Dubois B, Ellinghaus D, Elovaara I, Esposito F, Fontenille C, Foote S, Franke A, Galimberti D, Ghezzi A, Glessner J, Gomez R, Gout O, Graham C, Grant SF, Guerini FR, Hakonarson H, Hall P, Hamsten A, Hartung HP, Heard RN, Heath S, Hobart J, Hoshi M, Infante-Duarte C, Ingram G, Ingram W, Islam T, Jagodic M, Kabesch M, Kermode AG, Kilpatrick TJ, Kim C, Klopp N, Koivisto K, Larsson M, Lathrop M, Lechner-Scott JS, Leone MA, Leppä V, Liljedahl U, Bomfim IL, Lincoln RR, Link J, Liu J, Lorentzen AR, Lupoli S, Macciardi F, Mack T, Marriott M, Martinelli V, Mason D, McCauley JL, Mentch F, Mero IL, Mihalova T, Montalban X, Mottershead J, Myhr KM, Naldi P, Ollier W, Page A, Palotie A, Pelletier J, Piccio L, Pickersgill T, Piehl F, Pobywajlo S, Quach HL, Ramsay PP, Reunanen M, Reynolds R, Rioux JD, Rodegher M, Roesner S, Rubio JP, Rückert IM, Salvetti M, Salvi E, Santaniello A, Schaefer CA, Schreiber S, Schulze C, Scott RJ, Sellebjerg F, Selmaj KW, Sexton D, Shen L, Simms-Acuna B, Skidmore S, Sleiman PM, Smestad C, Sørensen PS, Søndergaard HB, Stankovich J, Strange RC, Sulonen AM, Sundqvist E, Syvänen AC, Taddeo F, Taylor B, Blackwell JM, Tienari P, Bramon E, Tourbah A, Brown MA, Tronczynska E, Casas JP, Tubridy N, Corvin A, Vickery J, Jankowski J, Villoslada P, Markus HS, Wang K, Mathew CG, Wason J, Palmer CN, Wichmann HE, Plomin R, Willoughby E, Rautanen A, Winkelmann J, Wittig M, Trembath RC, Yaouanq J, Viswanathan AC, Zhang H, Wood NW, Zuvich R, Deloukas P, Langford C, Duncanson A, Oksenberg JR, Pericak-Vance MA, Haines JL, Olsson T, Hillert J, Ivinson AJ, De Jager PL, Peltonen L, Stewart GJ, Hafler DA, Hauser SL, McVean G, Donnelly P, Compston A. Genetic risk and a primary role for cell-mediated immune mechanisms in multiple sclerosis. Nature 2011;476:214–19 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Matesanz F, González-Pérez A, Lucas M, Sanna S, Gayán J, Urcelay E, Zara I, Pitzalis M, Cavanillas ML, Arroyo R, Zoledziewska M, Marrosu M, Fernández O, Leyva L, Alcina A, Fedetz M, Moreno-Rey C, Velasco J, Real LM, Ruiz-Peña JL, Cucca F, Ruiz A, Izquierdo G. Genome-wide association study of multiple sclerosis confirms a novel locus at 5p13.1. PLoS One 2012;7:e36140. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Kristjansdottir G, Sandling JK, Bonetti A, Roos IM, Milani L, Wang C, Gustafsdottir SM, Sigurdsson S, Lundmark A, Tienari PJ, Koivisto K, Elovaara I, Pirttilä T, Reunanen M, Peltonen L, Saarela J, Hillert J, Olsson T, Landegren U, Alcina A, Fernández O, Leyva L, Guerrero M, Lucas M, Izquierdo G, Matesanz F, Syvänen AC. Interferon regulatory factor 5 (IRF5) gene variants are associated with multiple sclerosis in three distinct populations. J Med Genet 2008;45:362–9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Goris A, Boonen S, D'hooghe MB, Dubois B. Replication of KIF21B as a susceptibility locus for multiple sclerosis. J Med Genet 2010;47:775–6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Australia and New Zealand Multiple Sclerosis Genetics Consortium (ANZgene) Genome-wide association study identifies new multiple sclerosis susceptibility loci on chromosomes 12 and 20. Nat Genet 2009;41:824–8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Raychaudhuri S, Remmers EF, Lee AT, Hackett R, Guiducci C, Burtt NP, Gianniny L, Korman BD, Padyukov L, Kurreeman FA, Chang M, Catanese JJ, Ding B, Wong S, van der Helm-van Mil AH, Neale BM, Coblyn J, Cui J, Tak PP, Wolbink GJ, Crusius JB, van der Horst-Bruinsma IE, Criswell LA, Amos CI, Seldin MF, Kastner DL, Ardlie KG, Alfredsson L, Costenbader KH, Altshuler D, Huizinga TW, Shadick NA, Weinblatt ME, de Vries N, Worthington J, Seielstad M, Toes RE, Karlson EW, Begovich AB, Klareskog L, Gregersen PK, Daly MJ, Plenge RM. Common variants at CD40 and other loci confer risk of rheumatoid arthritis. Nat Genet 2008;40:1216–23 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Zhernakova A, Stahl EA, Trynka G, Raychaudhuri S, Festen EA, Franke L, Westra HJ, Fehrmann RS, Kurreeman FA, Thomson B, Gupta N, Romanos J, McManus R, Ryan AW, Turner G, Brouwer E, Posthumus MD, Remmers EF, Tucci F, Toes R, Grandone E, Mazzilli MC, Rybak A, Cukrowska B, Coenen MJ, Radstake TR, van Riel PL, Li Y, de Bakker PI, Gregersen PK, Worthington J, Siminovitch KA, Klareskog L, Huizinga TW, Wijmenga C, Plenge RM. Meta-analysis of genome-wide association studies in celiac disease and rheumatoid arthritis identifies fourteen non-HLA shared loci. PLoS Genet 2011;7:e1002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Alcina A, Vandenbroeck K, Otaegui D, Saiz A, Gonzalez JR, Fernandez O, Cavanillas ML, Cénit MC, Arroyo R, Alloza I, García-Barcina M, Antigüedad A, Leyva L, Izquierdo G, Lucas M, Fedetz M, Pinto-Medel MJ, Olascoaga J, Blanco Y, Comabella M, Montalban X, Urcelay E, Matesanz F. The autoimmune disease-associated KIF5A, CD226 and SH2B3 gene variants confer susceptibility for multiple sclerosis. Genes Immun 2010;11:439–45 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Fung EY, Smyth DJ, Howson JM, Cooper JD, Walker NM, Stevens H, Wicker LS, Todd JA. Analysis of 17 autoimmune disease-associated variants in type 1 diabetes identifies 6q23/TNFAIP3 as a susceptibility locus. Genes Immun 2009;10:188–91 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Ramagopalan SV, Dyment DA, Cader MZ, Morrison KM, Disanto G, Morahan JM, Berlanga-Taylor AJ, Handel A, De Luca GC, Sadovnick AD, Lepage P, Montpetit A, Ebers GC. Rare variants in the CYP27B1 gene are associated with multiple sclerosis. Ann Neurol 2011;70:881–6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Bailey R, Cooper JD, Zeitels L, Smyth DJ, Yang JH, Walker NM, Hyppönen E, Dunger DB, Ramos-Lopez E, Badenhoop K, Nejentsev S, Todd JA. Association of the vitamin D metabolism gene CYP27B1 with type 1 diabetes. Diabetes 2007;56:2616–21 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Sundqvist E, Bäärnhielm M, Alfredsson L, Hillert J, Olsson T, Kockum I. Confirmation of association between multiple sclerosis and CYP27B1. Eur J Hum Genet 2010;18:1349–52 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Gandhi KS, McKay FC, Cox M, Riveros C, Armstrong N, Heard RN, Vucic S, Williams DW, Stankovich J, Brown M, Danoy P, Stewart GJ, Broadley S, Moscato P, Lechner-Scott J, Scott RJ, Booth DR; ANZgene Multiple Sclerosis Genetics Consortium The multiple sclerosis whole blood mRNA transcriptome and genetic associations indicate dysregulation of specific T cell pathways in pathogenesis. Hum Mol Genet 2010;19:2134–43 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Poser CM, Paty DW, Scheinberg L, McDonald WI, Davis FA, Ebers GC, Johnson KP, Sibley WA, Silberberg DH, Tourtellotte WW. (1983) New diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: guidelines for research protocols. Ann Neurol 1983;13:227–31 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Cavanillas ML, Fernández O, Comabella M, Alcina A, Fedetz M, Izquierdo G, Lucas M, Cénit MC, Arroyo R, Vandenbroeck K, Alloza I, García-Barcina M, Antigüedad A, Leyva L, Gómez CL, Olascoaga J, Otaegui D, Blanco Y, Saiz A, Montalbán X, Matesanz F, Urcelay E. Replication of top markers of a genome-wide association study in multiple sclerosis in Spain. Genes Immun 2010;12:110–15 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Wigginton JE, Cutler DJ, Abecasis GR. A note on exact tests of Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium. Am J Hum Genet 2005;76:887–93 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y. Controlling the false discovery rate: A practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J R Statist Sic B 1995;57:289–300 [Google Scholar]
- 25.Sarkar SK. False discovery and false nondiscovery rates in single-step multiple testing procedures. Ann Stat 2006;34:394–415 [Google Scholar]
- 26.Barrett JC, Fry B, Maller J, Daly MJ. Haploview: analysis and visualization of LD and haplotype maps. Bioinformatics 2005,21:263–5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Zeller T, Wild P, Szymczak S, Rotival M, Schillert A, Castagne R, Maouche S, Germain M, Lackner K, Rossmann H, Eleftheriadis M, Sinning CR, Schnabel RB, Lubos E, Mennerich D, Rust W, Perret C, Proust C, Nicaud V, Loscalzo J, Hübner N, Tregouet D, Münzel T, Ziegler A, Tiret L, Blankenberg S, Cambien F. Genetics and beyond—the transcriptome of human monocytes and disease susceptibility. PLoS One 2010;5:e10693. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Dixon AL, Liang L, Moffatt MF, Chen W, Heath S, Wong KC, Taylor J, Burnett E, Gut I, Farrall M, Lathrop GM, Abecasis GR, Cookson WO. A genome-wide association study of global gene expression. Nat Genet 2007;39:1202–7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Montgomery SB, Sammeth M, Gutierrez-Arcelus M, Lach RP, Ingle C, Nisbett J, Guigo R, Dermitzakis ET. Transcriptome genetics using second generation sequencing in a Caucasian population. Nature 2010;464:773–7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Stranger BE, Nica AC, Forrest MS, Dimas A, Bird CP, Beazley C, Ingle CE, Dunning M, Flicek P, Koller D, Montgomery S, Tavaré S, Deloukas P, Dermitzakis ET. Population genomics of human gene expression. Nat Genet 2007;39:1217–24 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Dimas AS, Deutsch S, Stranger BE, Montgomery SB, Borel C, Attar-Cohen H, Ingle C, Beazley C, Gutierrez Arcelus M, Sekowska M, Gagnebin M, Nisbett J, Deloukas P, Dermitzakis ET, Antonarakis SE. Common regulatory variation impacts gene expression in a cell type-dependent manner. Science 2009;325:1246–50 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Ceribelli M, Dolfini D, Merico D, Gatta R, Viganò AM, Pavesi G, Mantovani R. The histone-like NF-Y is a bifunctional transcription factor. Mol Cell Biol 2008;28:2047–58 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Sakabe NJ, Aneas I, Shen T, Shokri L, Park SY, Bulyk ML, Evans SM, Nobrega MA. Dual transcriptional activator and repressor roles of TBX20 regulate adult cardiac structure and function. Hum Mol Genet 2012;21:2194–204 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Zarnegar MA, Chen J, Rothenberg EV. Cell-type-specific activation and repression of PU.1 by a complex of discrete, functionally specialized cis-regulatory elements. Mol Cell Biol 2010;30:4922–39 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Pinskaya M, Morillon A. Histone H3 lysine 4 di-methylation: a novel mark for transcriptional fidelity? Epigenetics 2009;4:302–6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Li G, Ruan X, Auerbach RK, Sandhu KS, Zheng M, Wang P, Poh HM, Goh Y, Lim J, Zhang J, Sim HS, Peh SQ, Mulawadi FH, Ong CT, Orlov YL, Hong S, Zhang Z, Landt S, Raha D, Euskirchen G, Wei CL, Ge W, Wang H, Davis C, Fisher-Aylor KI, Mortazavi A, Gerstein M, Gingeras T, Wold B, Sun Y, Fullwood MJ, Cheung E, Liu E, Sung WK, Snyder M, Ruan Y. Extensive promoter-centered chromatin interactions provide a topological basis for transcription regulation. Cell 2012;148:84–98 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Chepelev I, Wei G, Wangsa D, Tang Q, Zhao K. Characterization of genome-wide enhancer-promoter interactions reveals co-expression of interacting genes and modes of higher order chromatin organization. Cell Res 2012;22:490–503 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Adams JS, Hewison M. Extrarenal expression of the 25-hydroxyvitamin D-1-hydroxylase. Arch Biochem Biophys 2012;523:95–102 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Simon KC, Munger KL, Kraft P, Hunter DJ, De Jager PL, Ascherio A. Genetic predictors of 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels and risk of multiple sclerosis. J Neurol 2011;258:1676–82 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Orton SM, Morris AP, Herrera BM, Ramagopalan SV, Lincoln MR, Chao MJ, Vieth R, Sadovnick AD, Ebers GC. Evidence for genetic regulation of vitamin D status in twins with multiple sclerosis. Am J Clin Nutr 2008;88:441–7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Lange CM, Bojunga J, Ramos-Lopez E, von Wagner M, Hassler A, Vermehren J, Herrmann E, Badenhoop K, Zeuzem S, Sarrazin C. Vitamin D deficiency and a CYP27B1-1260 promoter polymorphism are associated with chronic hepatitis C and poor response to interferon-alfa based therapy. J Hepatol 2011;54:887–93 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Szodoray P, Nakken B, Gaal J, Jonsson R, Szegedi A, Zold E, Szegedi G, Brun JG, Gesztelyi R, Zeher M, Bodolay E. The complex role of vitamin D in autoimmune diseases. Scand J Immunol 2008;68:261–9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.