Abstract
Two Bangladeshi infectious bursal disease virus (IBDV) isolates collected in 2007, termed GB1 and GB3, were subjected to comparative sequencing and phylogenetic analyses. Sequence analysis of a 474-bp hypervariable region in the VP2 gene revealed that among four major amino acid substitutions observed in the strains, two were unique to GB1 and GB3 (Ser217Leu and Ala270Thr) while one substitution was only found in GB1 (Asn299Ser). Among IBDVs from Bangladesh including GB1 and GB3, the rate of identity and homology was around 97~99%. The amino acid sequences of GB1 and GB3 differ from those of previous Bangladeshi IBDV isolates and contain amino acid substitutions Pro222Ala and Asn299Ser (in GB3 only). Phylogenetic analysis revealed that GB1 and GB3 are grouped with other very virulent IBDVs of European and American origin in contrast to two previously isolated Bangladeshi IBDV strains (GenBank accession Nos. AF362776 and AF260317), which belong to the Asian group. It was concluded that GB1 and GB3 belong to a very virulent group of IBDVs. However, amino acid sequences of GB1 and GB3 differ from those of the other Bangladeshi IBDVs by one or two amino acids encoded in the hypervariable region of the VP2 gene.
Keywords: chickens, infectious bursal disease virus, molecular characterization
Introduction
Infectious bursal disease virus (IBDV), also known as Gumboro virus [4], has become an economically important pathogen spread throughout the world. The resulting disease can take several forms and has generally been observed as subclinical, classic virulent, or very virulent cases [33]. Among the two distinct serotypes of IBDV [16], serotype 1 strains are pathogenic and cause lytic infection of immature B lymphocytes [23,24]. Gumboro disease caused by serotype 1 viruses usually occurs in 3- to 6-week-old chickens with acute signs of clinical disease [15]. Susceptible chickens younger than 3 weeks old do not exhibit clinical signs but suffer from subclinical infections. This disease is economically important because it results in severe immunosuppression that develops in young chickens after infection [15]. Currently, there is a co-existence of epidemiologically mixed Gumboro viruses with different levels of pathogenicityin every country of the world [6]. The viruses might spread from different parts of world through trade and other means.
The IBDV is a non-enveloped, icosahedral double-stranded RNA (dsRNA) virus that belongs to the genus Avibirnavirus in the family Birnaviridae [13]. The dsRNA genome consists of two segments, namely A and B [19]. The smaller B segment (approximately 2.9 kb) encodes a single 91-kDa protein, VP1, with RNA-dependent RNA polymerase [29] and capping enzyme [28] activities. The larger A segment (approximately 3.3 kb) contains two overlapping open reading frames (ORFs). The first ORF encodes the nonstructural protein VP5 (17 kDa). This protein is nonessential for viral replication and infection [17]. The second ORF encodes a 110-kDa polyprotein, which is autocatalytically cleaved [12,26] to produce viral proteins VP2 (40 kDa), VP4 (28 kDa), and VP3 (32 kDa). Using sequence analysis and reverse genetics, VP2 from segment A [34,36], VP1 from segment B [14], or both [2,3] have been found to contribute to virulence.
The VP2 gene has a region of about 500 bp encoding approximately 150 amino acids including a major conformational neutralizing antigenic domain situated between amino acids 206 and 350 with two minor hydrophilic peaks [27,32]. This domain is known as a hypervariable region. Due to its characteristic antigenic structure, this region has been most often used for the molecular characterization of IBDV [35]. It has been confirmed that the residues 253 and 284 in VP2 contribute to the cell tropism and virulence of the virus [22].
In Bangladesh, chickens are produced for national consumption and export. The poultry industry is negatively affected by the damage caused by IBDV [1,8]. After initial recognition of IBDV in the country in 1992, studies on characteristics of this immunosuppressive virus and protection of chickens from its damage by vaccination have been conducted [7,8]. In the last two decades, antigenically variant strains have been detected in a number of geographically distinct countries [6]. A molecular and antigenic study of numerous previously isolated Bangladeshi IBDV strains have demonstrated their close similarities with very virulent IBDV (vvIBDV) recognized earlier in Europe, Asia, and Africa [8]. Here, we present updates for the molecular characterization of two recent IBDV isolates from Bangladesh.
Materials and Methods
Field viruses
Two IBDV isolates, BML-2/07 designated as GB1 (originating from swollen bursa from a 20-day-old layer chicken in Mymensingh, Bangladesh) and BTB-4/07 designated as GB3 (obtained from severe hemorrhagic bursa from a 17-day-old broiler chicken in Tangail, Bangladesh), were subjected tomolecular characterization in this study.
Genomic RNA extraction
Total genomic RNA and viral RNA was directly isolated from 20% bursal tissue homogenates using a QIAamp Viral RNA Mini Kit (Qiagen, Germany) according to the manufacturer's instructions. The eluted viral RNA was stored at -80℃ until being used for reverse transcription - polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR).
RT-PCR
A One Step RT-PCR kit (Qiagen, Germany) was used to amplify the VP2 variable region located in the central area of the VP2 coding region using the primers GF (forward: 5' GCCCAGAGTCTACACCATA 3') and GR (reverse: 5' GATCCTGTTGCCACTCTTTC 3'). The 50-µL reaction mixture contained 10 µL 5× Qiagen One Step RT-PCR reaction mixture, 2 µL of a 10-mM dNTP mix, 2 µL of each primer (10 pmol/µL), 2 µL enzyme mix, 2 µL template RNA, 2.5 µL DMSO, and 27.5 µL nuclease-free water. Reverse transcription was performed on a thermal cycler (Bio-Rad, USA) at 55℃ for 30 min followed by one cycle at 95℃ for 15 sec. This was followed by 35 cycles of denaturation at 94℃ for 20 sec, annealing at 55℃ for 20 sec, and elongation at 72℃ for 1 min. A final extension step was performed at 72℃ for 10 min. The RT-PCR products were then kept at 4℃ until purification.
Amplicon purification, cloning, and DNA sequencing
Purification of the amplicons was carried out using a QIAquick Purification Kit (Qiagen, Germany) according to the manufacturer's instructions. A TA cloning kit (Invitrogen, USA) was then used to clone the VP2 fragment into a pCR2.1-TOPO vector (Invitrogen, USA). Screening for positive clones was conducted as previously described by Sambrook and Russell [25]. Recombinant plasmid DNA harboring the RT-PCR product was sequenced with an automated 377 ABI DNA Sequencer (Applied Biosystems, USA) using a Big-Dye Terminator Cycle Sequencing Kit (Applied Biosystems, USA).
Data analysis and phylogenetic construction
For each IBDV strain, identical sequencingdata from two positive clones containing the expected VP2 DNA insert were recorded and analyzed. The sequences were edited with SeqEd v1.03 (Applied Biosystems, USA), aligned using AssemblyLIGN v1.9c (Accelrys, USA), and analyzed using the MacVector 8.2 package (Accelrys, USA) with a Macintosh computer system (Apple, USA). Specific identification of sequences was confirmed by comparison with known VP2 sequences in GenBank (National Center for Biotechnology Information, USA). Amino acid sequences were deduced by multiple alignments using GeneDoc (ver. 2.7) [21]. Phylogenetic trees were constructed using the MEGA 4.1 package [30]. Distance matrices were constructed using the Kimura's two-parameter model and trees were constructed using the neighbor-joining (NJ) algorithm. The dataset was resampled 1,000 times using the bootstrap method. Sequences of 15 strains obtained from GenBank were used for comparison (Table 1) and 75 strains were selected for phylogenetic tree construction.
Table 1.
*GenBank accession number. A: alanine, D: aspartic acid, H: histidine, I: isoleucine, L: leucine, N: asparagine, P: proline, Q: glutamine, S: serine, T: threonine , V: valine.
Results
Amino acid sequence analysis of the hypervariable VP2 region of GB1 and GB3 isolates
A 474-bp sequence encoding the hypervariable region of the VP2 protein (position: 606~1080 bp) from the GB1 and GB3 isolates was obtained. These sequences were used as entry data to search GenBank to confirm the VP2 sequence identity. Sequence from 15 strains in the GenBank database, including two classical isolates [52/70 (D00869), Cu-1 (D00867)] as well as very virulent strains from Europe, Asia, and North America were aligned (Table 2). Among the strains selected for comparative alignment, the sequences of VP2 genesfrom IBDVs of Bangladesh, Pakistan, and India were preferably considered in order to deduce the genetic relationship between viruses isolated in neighboring countries. Alignment of the predicted amino acid sequences encoded by nucleotides 606~1080 covering the VP2 hypervariable region is presented in Fig. 1.
Table 2.
The amino acid sequence of 52/70 (D00869) was used as a reference for comparison. A change in only one amino acid (serine at 299) was found in GB1 when comparing the same position for the 52/70 classical strain (Table 1 and Fig. 1). Amino acid substitutions in GB1 were similar to those found in the Asian IBDV strains. Among four major substitutions observed when comparing the strains (Fig. 1), two were unique to GB1 and GB3 (Ser217Leu and Ala270Thr). The Nepali isolates (NP2K and NP1SSH) had an alanine substitution at position 222, which has been identified as a marker of virulence. This was not observed in the isolates examined in the present study or other mostly classical isolates. This led to a speculation that the IBDV population in the South Asian geographic region is diverse and might influence vaccination programs in this region.
Nucleotide sequence identity and amino acid sequence homology
Table 2 shows results of the pairwise comparison conducted to evaluate nucleotide identity and amino acid homology between the 17 strains. Variation rate among the 17 strains was between 1~5% for the 474-bp nucleotide sequence and 1~7% for the corresponding 158 amino acids. The GB1 and GB3 Bangladeshi isolates differed less than 3% from other strains in terms of nucleotide sequence identity and amino acid homology. Interestingly, the GB3 isolate had a 100% identity with the nucleotide and amino acid sequences of the GSG4 isolate from Vietnam (AY841902). Among the IBDVs from Bangladesh, the rates of identity and homology were 97~99% compared to each other and to previously isolated strains (Table 2).
Assessment of the key amino acids of the Bangladeshi isolates
Table 1 shows key amino acids responsible for virulence for each strain at nine positions within the hypervariable region of the VP2 polypeptide. A very important amino acid, glutamine, responsible for virulence of IBDV was found at position 253. It is known that isolates with a glutamine at position 253 have increased pathogenicity while those with a histidine at position 253 are much less pathogenic. As shown in Table 1, the CU1 and D78 isolates had a histidine at this site while the remaining strains including GB1 and GB3 had glutamine at this position. However, unlike the previously obtained Bangladeshi IBDV isolates, both GB1 and GB3had a proline at position 222 while GB3 had asparagine at position 299.
Phylogenetic associations
For the phylogenetic analysis, sequences of the VP2 hypervariable region from 75 isolates obtained from GenBank along with those of the GB1 and GB3 Bangladeshi isolates were included in the study. The sequences were compared using GeneDoc (ver. 2.7) and MEGA 4.1 with 1,000 bootstrap resamplings and the NJ method. Phylogenetic trees were created based on data from nucleotide sequences along with the amino acid sequences (Fig. 2). Two major clusters formed in all constructed trees; these clusters were considered to represent Euro-American and Asian groups. GB1 and GB3 Bangladeshi IBDVs were grouped with 40 other strains of European and American origin. This is in contrast to the previously isolated Bangladeshi IBDV strains marked BD3-99 (GenBank accession Nos. AF362776 and AF260317) that wereplaced into the Asian group (Fig. 2). Among the Euro-American viruses in the first group, there were a number of IBDV strains that had been isolated in Asia. Likewise, there were several viruses isolated in Europe and other parts of the world that were in the Asian group of isolates.
Discussion
Residues present in the VP2 region at positions 222, 242, 253, 256, 279, 284, 294, 299, and 329 are key amino acids believed to be responsible for viral antigenicity and pathogenicity [5,10,11,20,38]. Any amino acid changes at these positions may result in variability of pathogenic potential and antigenicity. Recently, special attention was given to amino acids at position 253 wherehistidine or glutamine is found [10]. Because of the intensive vaccination programs performed in the field with live attenuated viruses, there is a possibility that the viruses used mutate and subsequently change their pathogenic potential [10].
Molecular evaluation of the hypervariable region of two isolates was conducted to compare their nucleotide and amino acid sequences with those of other strains fromneighboring countries and other parts of the world. A comparative alignment and phylogenetic analysis of the hypervariable domain of the VP2 region helped to group the IBDV isolates into different pathogenic subgroups and assess geographical subtypes. Results obtained from molecular analysis of the recent IBDV isolates demonstrated that these strains have similarities with previously characterized Bangladeshi isolates in terms of molecular features and virulence level. Amino acids found at positions 253 and 284 [10,11,37] indicated that these isolates have a very virulent pathotype, similar to IBDVs previously isolated in 1999 [8].
A glutamine residue at position 253 and alanine at position 284 were found in the two isolates examined in the present study as well as the previously isolated Bangladeshi IBDV and a number of recently isolated strains of European and Asian origin. These two residues are responsible for pathogenicity andare unique to highly virulent IBDVs. Our findings demonstrated that GB1 and GB3 are of a virulent nature [10]. However, the GB1 and GB3 viruses differed from the previous Bangladeshi IBDV isolates by having a proline residue at position 222 instead of alanine. One of these viruses, GB3, had an aspargine at position 299 while the other isolates contained a serine. This may be indicative of genetic variation between the recent two isolates and the previously isolated Bangladeshi IBDVs although all of these viruses fall into same virulence group.
The origin of vvIBDVs and how these viruses spread throughout various countries including Bangladesh are not clear [31,32]. Nowadays, strains of viruses with every virulence level and different pathogenicities exist, and live attenuated vaccines have been introduced in many countries as a result [9,18]. Over the last 20 years, the IBDV has changed and new pathogenic variants have evolved so that the virus exists as low, mild, and vvIBDVs in the field. Results of our phylogenetic analysis based on the VP2 hypervariable sequences demonstrated the contrasting relationships between the previously and recently isolated Bangladeshi IBDVs. Sequence analysis of the hypervariable region of VP2 gene, typically used for phylogenesis, is crucial but the full length of the protein-coding sequence of the A segment might reveal more of the fine differences between strains. Comparative alignment and phylogenetic analysis of the full genome or at least the entire VP2 sequence would provide better molecular and functional comparisons.
Based on our findings, we concluded that that the two recent IBDV isolates evaluated in the present study belong to a very virulent group similar to the previously isolated Bangladeshi IBDVs. However, amino acid sequences of the hypervariable VP2 region of the two recent isolates differed from those of the other IBVDs by one or two key amino acids.
Acknowledgments
The authors gratefully acknowledge the financial assistance from the University Grants Commission of Bangladesh for conducting this research work.
References
- 1.Biswas PK, Biswas D, Ahmed S, Rahman A, Debnath NC. A longitudinal study of the incidence of major endemic and epidemic diseases affecting semi-scavenging chickens reared under the Participatory Livestock Development Project areas in Bangladesh. Avian Pathol. 2005;34:303–312. doi: 10.1080/03079450500178972. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Boot HJ, Hoekman AJW, Gielkens ALJ. The enhanced virulence of very virulent infectious bursal disease virus is partly determined by its B-segment. Arch Virol. 2005;150:137–144. doi: 10.1007/s00705-004-0405-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Boot HJ, ter Huurne AAHM, Hoekman AJW, Peeters BPH, Gielkens ALJ. Rescue of very virulent and mosaic infectious bursal disease virus from cloned cDNA: VP2 is not the sole determinant of the very virulent phenotype. J Virol. 2000;74:6701–6711. doi: 10.1128/jvi.74.15.6701-6711.2000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Cosgrove AS. An apparently new disease of chickens - avian nephrosis. Avian Dis. 1962;6:385–389. [Google Scholar]
- 5.Eterradossi N, Arnauld C, Toquin D, Rivallan G. Critical amino acid changes in VP2 variable domain are associated with typical and atypical antigenicity in very virulent infectious bursal disease viruses. Arch Virol. 1998;143:1627–1636. doi: 10.1007/s007050050404. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Ignjatovic J, Sapats S. Confirmation of the existence of two distinct genetic groups of infectious bursal disease virus in Australia. Aust Vet J. 2002;80:689–694. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-0813.2002.tb11299.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Islam MR, Chowdhury EH, Das PM, Dewan ML. Pathology of acute infectious bursal disease virus in chickens induced experimentally with a very virulent isolate. Indian J Anim Sci. 1997;67:7–9. [Google Scholar]
- 8.Islam MR, Zierenberg K, Eterradossi N, Toquin D, Rivallan G, Müller H. Molecular and antigenic characterization of Bangladeshi isolates of infectious bursal disease virus demonstrate their similarities with recent European, Asian and African very virulent strains. J Vet Med B Infect Dis Vet Public Health. 2001;48:211–221. doi: 10.1046/j.1439-0450.2001.00449.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Jackwood DJ. Recent trends in the molecular diagnosis of infectious bursal disease viruses. Anim Health Res Rev. 2004;5:313–316. doi: 10.1079/ahr200490. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Jackwood DJ, Sreedevi B, LeFever LJ, Sommer-Wagner SE. Studies on naturally occurring infectious bursal disease viruses suggest that a single amino acid substitution at position 253 in VP2 increases pathogenicity. Virology. 2008;377:110–116. doi: 10.1016/j.virol.2008.04.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Kibenge FSB, Jackwood DJ, Mercado CC. Nucleotide sequence analysis of genome segment A of infectious bursal disease virus. J Gen Virol. 1990;71(Pt 3):569–577. doi: 10.1099/0022-1317-71-3-569. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Kibenge FSB, Qian B, Cleghorn JR, Martin CK. Infectious bursal disease virus polyprotein processing does not involve cellular proteases. Arch Virol. 1997;142:2401–2419. doi: 10.1007/s007050050251. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Leong JC, Brown D, Dobos P, Kibenge FSB, Ludert JE, Müller H, Mundt E, Nicholson B. Familly Birnaviridae. In: van Regenmortel MHV, Fauquet CM, Bishop DHL, Carstens EB, Estes MK, Lemon SM, Maniloff J, Mayo MA, McGeoch DJ, Pringle CR, Wickner RB, editors. Virus Taxonomy: Classification and Nomenclature of Viruses: Seventh Report of the International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses. San Diego: Academic Press; 2000. pp. 481–490. [Google Scholar]
- 14.Liu M, Vakharia VN. VP1 protein of infectious bursal disease virus modulates the virulence in vivo. Virology. 2004;330:62–73. doi: 10.1016/j.virol.2004.09.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Lukert PD, Saif YM. Infectious bursal disease. In: Saif YM, Barnes HJ, Glisson JR, Fadly AM, McDougald LR, Swayne DE, editors. Diseases of Poultry. 11th ed. Ames: Iowa State Press; 2003. pp. 161–179. [Google Scholar]
- 16.McFerran JB, McNulty MS, McKillop ER, Connor TJ, McCracken RM, Collins DS, Allan GM. Isolation and serological studies with infectious bursal disease viruses from fowl, turkeys and ducks: demonstration of a second serotype. Avian Pathol. 1980;9:395–404. doi: 10.1080/03079458008418423. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Mundt E, Köllner B, Kretzschmar D. VP5 of infectious bursal disease virus is not essential for viral replication in cell culture. J Virol. 1997;71:5647–5651. doi: 10.1128/jvi.71.7.5647-5651.1997. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Müller H, Islam MR, Raue R. Research on infectious bursal disease--the past, the present and the future. Vet Microbiol. 2003;97:153–165. doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2003.08.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Müller R, Käufer I, Reinacher M, Weiss E. Immunofluorescent studies of early virus propagation after oral infection with infectious bursal disease virus (IBDV) Zentralbl Veterinarmed B. 1979;26:345–352. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0450.1979.tb00823.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Nagarajan MM, Kibenge FSB. Infectious bursal disease virus: a review of molecular basis for variations in antigenicity and virulence. Can J Vet Res. 1997;61:81–88. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Nicholas KB, Nicholas HB, Jr, Deerfield DW., 2nd GeneDoc: analysis and visualization of genetic variation. EMBNET News. 1997;4:1–4. [Google Scholar]
- 22.Qi X, Gao H, Gao Y, Qin L, Wang Y, Gao L, Wang X. Naturally occurring mutations at residues 253 and 284 in VP2 contribute to the cell tropism and virulence of very virulent infectious bursal disease virus. Antiviral Res. 2009;84:225–233. doi: 10.1016/j.antiviral.2009.09.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Rautenschlein S, Yeh HY, Sharma JM. Comparative immunopathogenesis of mild, intermediate, and virulent strains of classic infectious bursal disease virus. Avian Dis. 2003;47:66–78. doi: 10.1637/0005-2086(2003)047[0066:CIOMIA]2.0.CO;2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Rodriguez-Chavez IR, Rosenberger JK, Cloud SS. Characterization of the antigenic, immunogenic, and pathogenic variation of infectious bursal disease virus due to propagation in different host systems (bursa, embryo, and cell culture). II. Antigenicity at the epitope level. Avian Pathol. 2002;31:473–483. doi: 10.1080/0307945021000005842. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Sambrook J, Russell DW. Molecular Cloning: a Laboratory Manual. 3rd ed. Vol. 3. New York: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press; 2001. pp. 15.1–18.136. [Google Scholar]
- 26.Sánchez AB, Rodriguez JF. Proteolytic processing in infectious bursal disease virus: identification of the polyprotein cleavage sites by site-directed mutagenesis. Virology. 1999;262:190–199. doi: 10.1006/viro.1999.9910. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Schnitzler D, Bernstein F, Müller H, Becht H. The genetic basis for the antigenicity of the VP2 protein of the infectious bursal disease virus. J Gen Virol. 1993;74(Pt 8):1563–1571. doi: 10.1099/0022-1317-74-8-1563. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Spies U, Müller H. Demonstration of enzyme activities required for cap structure formation in infectious bursal disease virus, a member of the birnavirus group. J Gen Virol. 1990;71(Pt 4):977–981. doi: 10.1099/0022-1317-71-4-977. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Tacken MGJ, Peeters BPH, Thomas AAM, Rottier PJM, Boot HJ. Infectious bursal disease virus capsid protein VP3 interacts both with VP1, the RNA-dependent RNA polymerase, and with viral double-stranded RNA. J Virol. 2002;76:11301–11311. doi: 10.1128/JVI.76.22.11301-11311.2002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Tamura K, Dudley J, Nei M, Kumar S. MEGA4: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis (MEGA) software version 4.0. Mol Biol Evol. 2007;24:1596–1599. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msm092. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.van den Berg TP, Gonze M, Meulemans G. Acute infectious bursal disease in poultry: isolation and characterisation of a highly virulent strain. Avian Pathol. 1991;20:133–143. doi: 10.1080/03079459108418748. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.van den Berg TP, Gonze M, Morales D, Meulemans G. Acute infectious bursal disease in poultry: immunological and molecular basis of antigenicity of a highly virulent strain. Avian Pathol. 1996;25:751–768. doi: 10.1080/03079459608419179. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.van den Berg TP, Morales D, Eterradossi N, Rivallan G, Toquin D, Raue R, Zierenberg K, Zhang MF, Zhu YP, Wang CQ, Zheng HJ, Wang X, Chen GC, Lim BL, Müller H. Assessment of genetic, antigenic and pathotypic criteria for the characterization of IBDV strains. Avian Pathol. 2004;33:470–476. doi: 10.1080/03079450400003650. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Wang XM, Zeng XW, Gao HL, Fu CY, Wei P. Changes in VP2 gene during the attenuation of very virulent infectious bursal disease virus strain Gx isolated in China. Avian Dis. 2004;48:77–83. doi: 10.1637/7061. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Yamaguchi T, Kasanga CJ, Terasaki K, Maw MT, Ohya K, Fukushi H. Nucleotide sequence analysis of VP2 hypervariable domain of infectious bursal disease virus detected in Japan from 1993 to 2004. J Vet Med Sci. 2007;69:733–738. doi: 10.1292/jvms.69.733. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Yamaguchi T, Ogawa M, Inoshima Y, Miyoshi M, Fukushi H, Hirai K. Identification of sequence changes responsible for the attenuation of highly virulent infectious bursal disease virus. Virology. 1996;223:219–223. doi: 10.1006/viro.1996.0470. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Yamaguchi T, Ogawa M, Miyoshi M, Inoshima Y, Fukushi H, Hirai K. Sequence and phylogenetic analyses of highly virulent infectious bursal disease virus. Arch Virol. 1997;142:1441–1458. doi: 10.1007/s007050050171. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Zierenberg K, Nieper H, van den Berg TP, Ezeokoli CD, Voss M, Müller H. The VP2 variable region of African and German isolates of infectious bursal disease virus: comparison with very virulent, "classical" virulent, and attenuated tissue culture-adapted strains. Arch Virol. 2000;145:113–125. doi: 10.1007/s007050050009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]