Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Jan 8.
Published in final edited form as: Curr Treat Options Neurol. 2008 May;10(3):186–192. doi: 10.1007/s11940-008-0020-2

Congenital Cytomegalovirus Infection: Update on Management Strategies

Mark R Schleiss 1
PMCID: PMC3539797  NIHMSID: NIHMS185336  PMID: 18579022

Introduction

CMV infection is ubiquitous in the general population, and rarely produces symptoms in the immunocompetent infant, child, or adult. CMV-induced illness may in contrast be serious in individuals with impaired immune systems, including HIV-infected individuals, solid organ and hematopoietic transplant patients, and infants infected in utero. In the developed world, congenital CMV infection is present in approximately 1% (0.5–2%) of all live births, making this the most common congenital viral infection1. This corresponds to approximately 40,000 infants born with CMV infection every year in the United States, making this infection a more common cause of birth defects in newborns than other, better known childhood conditions, such as Down syndrome, fetal alcohol syndrome, and spina bifida2. Rates of congenital CMV infection tend to parallel those of maternal seropositivity. It estimated that in the United State every year, approximately 27000 women acquire primary CMV infection during pregnancy3. Young maternal age, single marital status, and non-white race are associated with higher rates of congenital CMV infection. Women with occupational exposure that are associated with increased exposure to young children, including teachers and day-care providers, may be at increased risk of acquiring primary CMV infections4.

Transmission of CMV appears to be more common in the setting of a primary maternal infection. Primary maternal infection during pregnancy results in intrauterine infection of the fetus in 30–40% of cases, compared to a risk of ~1% in women with preconceptual immunity who are re-infected during pregnancy (non-primary infection)5, 6. Although preexisting maternal immunity reduces the incidence of maternal-fetal transmission, recent evidence seems to suggest that the severity of congenital CMV disease in the infected newborn is similar following primary or non-primary maternal infections710. Thus, intervention programs could be targeted both to the woman with a primary CMV infection identified during pregnancy, and to the newborn infant identified with congenital CMV during newborn screening. Caution must be exercised in interpreting the results of virological tests obtained beyond 14–21 days of age, since the identification of CMV in such infants may represent post-natal acquisition of infection, typically acquired through breast-feeding11.

Early signs and symptoms are apparent at birth in 10–15% of all children with congenital CMV infection. Each year in the United State this corresponds to 4,000–6,000 infants born with symptomatic congenital CMV disease. Infection in the symptomatic infant may involve any organ and ranges from mild isolated, transient illness to severe, fulminant dissemination resulting in up to 20% perinatal mortality12. Fulminant illness is characterized by jaundice, hepatosplenomegaly, lethargy, respiratory distress, seizures, and petechial rash, and infants may exhibit a wide spectrum of disease, including hemolysis, bone marrow suppression, hepatitis, pneumonitis, enteritis, and nephritis1315. Antiviral therapy may be life-saving for infants with overwhelming infection and severe organ disease.

Of major importance is the issue of CNS involvement in congenital CMV infection. Infants who are symptomatic in the newborn period commonly present with cerebral lesions, including meningoencephalitis, calcifications, microcephaly, disturbances in neuronal migration, germinal matrix cysts, ventriculomegaly, and cerebellar hypoplasia16 (Table 1). CNS disease usually results in at least one of the following signs and symptoms: lethargy, microcephaly, intracranial calcifications, hypotonia, seizures, hearing deficit, and abnormal eye exam. CNS involvement as may be reflected by the clinical finding of microcephaly, and corroborated by abnormal imaging studies (cranial CT, brain MRI, or head ultrasound)17, 18. An example of an abnormal MRI scan of a symptomatic congenitally infected infant is demonstrated in Fig. 1. The risk of long-term neurodevelopmental disabilities is high in this setting, and is observed in 50–90% of children who are symptomatic at birth. Long-term sequelae may occur, and include microcephaly, hearing loss, motor deficits (paresis/paralysis), cerebral palsy, mental retardation, seizures, ocular abnormalities (chorioretinitis, optic atrophy), and learning disabilities (Table 1).

In contrast, long-term neurodevelopment injury is less likely in congenitally infected infants who are asymptomatic at birth, and when it occurs, it is typically limited to hearing deficits (see below)1922. Sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL), which is the most frequent sequelae of congenital CMV infection, and may occur in both symptomatic and asymptomatically infected infants. The bulk of the evidence regarding the potential benefits of antiviral therapies (reviewed below) for congenital CMV infection relates to the issue of SNHL: thus, this is an area of unique importance in the assessment of the role of treatment of congenital CMV infection. The incidence of hearing loss among children with congenital CMV infection ranges from 10–15% of those infants who are asymptomatically infected at birth, to up to 60% of symptomatic congenitally infected infants23, 24. SNHL can be progressive and fluctuating, and can range in severity from a unilateral, mild hearing deficit to severe, bilateral profound deafness2527. Patients with symptomatic congenital CMV disease with clinical and laboratory findings suggestive of disseminated infection at birth such as petechiae, hepatosplenomegaly, and CNS abnormalities, as well as those with high viral load as measured by quantitative PCR, appear to have an increased risk of developing SNHL28, 29. Interestingly, CMV-induced SNHL may be present at birth or can become evident later in childhood; in this delayed-onset group, hearing loss usually occurs prior to 4 years of age30. All congenitally infected infants, irrespective of the results of functional newborn hearing screening, should be monitored regularly for SNHL. This issue is likely to become of increasing importance over the next few years as more efforts are undertaken to implement universal newborn screening of newborns for congenital CMV infection, using newborn blood spot cards for PCR-based detection of viral genome31. As such infants are identified, serial audiologic and neurodevelopmental assessments will be necessary, and selected infants will be candidates for antiviral drug treatment.

Treatment

Although much of the injury produced by congenital CMV infection, particularly to the fetal brain, occurs in utero, it is likely that antiviral therapy of the newborn will have only modest impact on the long-term outcomes for the most severely affected infants. However, recent evidence suggests that treatment of pregnant woman with primary CMV infection can improve the outcome for the fetus. The roles of therapy for both the newborn infant (with ganciclovir) and the pregnant patient (with CMV immune globulin) are discussed below.

Pharmacologic Treatment

Ganciclovir

Standard dose: 12 mg/kg/day

Contraindications: Neutropenia, renal insufficiency

Main Drug Interactions: None

Main Side Effects: Neutropenia

Special Points: Use of ganciclovir in infants is not FDA-approved. Evidence to support efficacy is limited. Use in infants with congenital CMV infection appears to be justified in newborns with neurologic manifestations at the time of diagnosis (see below).

Cost: Cytovene® (ganciclovir; manufactured by Roche) is supplied in 500 mg dose vials. The cost for 25 unit dose vials is $1491.60 (Drug Topics Red Book 2007, Medical Economics Co., Montvale, NJ).

Cost Effectiveness: Since the agent is not FDA approved for use in children, the cost effectiveness is unknown at this time.

Notes of Interest Regarding Antiviral Therapy for Congenital CMV

The prototypic antiviral for CMV infection is the nucleoside analog, ganciclovir, and considerable experience has been accrued with this drug over the past 20 years, particularly in immunosuppressed patients, particularly solid organ and bone marrow transplant recipients, and patients with HIV infection32. To examine whether the benefits of antiviral therapy could be extended to newborns, in 1991 the first Phase III, randomized, non-blinded controlled trial of ganciclovir for infants with congenital CMV disease was initiated33. A six-weeks course of ganciclovir (6 mg/kg/dose every 12 hrs) was given to a randomized group of newborns with virologically confirmed congenital CMV who also had documented CNS involvement. The primary endpoint was improved hearing, or retention of normal hearing. Small, but significant differences between treated and untreated groups were noted, including normal or improved hearing at 6 months of age. With respect to drug toxicities, almost two-thirds of the treated infants developed neutropenia, which was reversible. These data provided strong support for consideration of therapy of congenital CMV infection in infants with CNS abnormalities. What remains to be determined is whether or not asymptomatic congenitally infected infants can benefit from ganciclovir therapy, with respect to the risk of development of SNHL. It will also be an important priority to determine if the oral formulation of ganciclovir, valganciclovir, is an acceptable alternative in newborns, thus obviating the need for central venous access for prolonged intravenous ganciclovir administration. Studies by the Collaborative Antiviral Study Group, (CASG), a multi-institutional collaborative network funded by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, should answer these questions in the coming years (www.casg.uab.org).

In infants with life- or sight-threatening organ disease, CNS involvement, or in those with persistent or reoccurring disease, ganciclovir therapy should be utilized [33; Class I study]. There is still a need for further evidence that early treatment prevents, delays, or alters the onset of late or progressive SNHL, particularly in the asymptomatic congenitally infected infant. In addition to ganciclovir (and its oral prodrug, valganciclovir) there are currently two other anti-virals licensed for the treatment of CMV infection, foscarnet and cidofovir (Table 2). Experience with these agents in the setting of congenital CMV infection is extremely limited32.

Surgery

Standard procedure: Cochlear implantation.

Contraindications: None.

Complications: CSF leak/fistulae. Meningitis.

Special points: Use for congenital CMV infection with hearing loss is undefined. Case series indicate benefit with normalization of speech and language development.

Cost / cost effectiveness: Unknown.

Physical/Speech Therapy and Exercise

Specific therapy: Speech therapy should be provided to children with congenital CMV infection with hearing loss. Physical therapy should be provided to children with cerebral palsy and developmental delay.

Usage: Individualized, depending upon extent of child's disability.

Special points: Children with known congenital CMV should have periodic assessements of hearing and development throughout early childhood.

Cost / cost effectiveness: Undefined.

Emerging Therapies

Specific emerging therapy: Cytomegalovirus Immune Globulin

Standard procedure: Undefined (see below).

Contraindications: Allergy or anaphylaxis to any components; known IgA deficiency.

Complications: Unknown.

Special points: Investigational.

Cost: The cost of the Ig described by Nigro et al. (34) is unknown because the product used in this study is not commercially available. An analogous product, Cytogam® (CMV-Ig; manufactured by MedImmune) is $1057.51 for a 50 ml vial (Drug Topics Red Book 2007, Medical Economics Co., Montvale, MN).

Cost effectiveness: Unknown; intervention has not yet been subject to double-blind placebo-controlled study.

In contrast to the approach of treating the congenitally infected newborn, there has been recent evaluation of a strategy of treatment of the pregnant patient who has evidence of primary CMV infection and fetal infection in utero. These studies have been performed in Italy, a country with well-organized obstetrical programs for maternal CMV screening during pregnancy. The intervention that has been evaluated is that of a CMV-specific immune globulin [34; Class III]. In a recent, prospective, non-randomized trial, which studied 157 pregnant women with confirmed primary CMV infection and their newborn infants, administration of CMV-specific hyperimmune globulin (HIG) to the pregnant women was followed by evaluation of the newborn for the presence and clinical presentation of congenital CMV infection34. The study cohort was divided into therapy and prevention groups. The therapy group comprised 55 women with CMV-positive amniotic fluid and who were offered HIG. A prevention group, consisting of 102 women who did not undergo amniocentesis, was also offered HIG. In the therapy group 3% of the women elected to receive HIG gave birth to an infant with symptomatic congenital CMV disease, as compare with 50% of women who did not receive HIG. In the prevention group, 16% of the women who received HIG had infants with congenital CMV infection, as compared to 40% who did not receive HIG. No adverse events were associated with HIG infusion. This trial showed that CMV specific HIG is safe and may be effective in the treatment and prevention of congenital CMV infection. Although HIG cannot be considered at this time to be a standard of care for CMV infection documented during pregnancy, additional randomized controlled trials are warranted to further validate the protective effect and the clinical practicality of using passive immunization for prevention of congenital CMV transmission35.

Other Considerations

  • Infants with virologically confirmed congenital CMV infection should undergo complete physical examination and focused laboratory and imaging studies to determine the extent of the disease.

  • Appropriate counseling of parents should be provided, and early intervention undertaken to maximize performance in children with high risk for disabilities. Careful physical exam evaluating for head circumference, weight, growth rate, and neurological deficits in combination with cranial imaging is essential.

  • Several cranial imaging modalities such as cranial ultrasound (US), head computed tomography (CT) and brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), are available for detecting brain lesions associated with congenital CMV infection; abnormal head CT is a predictor for an adverse neurodevelopmental outcome, while a normal CT scan has an excellent predictive value for good long-term outcome.

  • Since sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) is the most common late sequelae of congenital CMV infection, careful monitoring for this complication is required. Hearing evaluation should be a component of the initial evaluation, and age-appropriate evaluations should be repeated throughout early childhood, since hearing deficit is often progressive and may fluctuate.

  • Early recognition of SNHL and interventions like ganciclovir, speech/language therapy, centers for deafness education, and cochlear implants may markedly improve the developmental, social, and language skills of a child with hearing impairment.

  • Long-term follow-up should consist of a multidisciplinary approach; in addition to a pediatric infectious diseases specialist, a pediatric otolaryngology specialist, a child behavioral-developmental specialist, a physical therapy, an ophthalmologist, and a neurologist may all be important members of the care team.

Opinion Statement.

Congenital cytomegalovirus (CMV) infections are under-recognized as a cause of serious morbidity in newborn infants. The era of therapeutic nihilism regarding these infections has come to an end, since useful therapies are available that may modify the outcome. Therapeutic interventions may be provided to treat the infected fetus in utero, or to treat the newborn infant when CMV is recognized in the neonatal period. Expanded newborn screening programs for congenital CMV will further heighten the importance of clinicians being aware of current therapeutic options.

References and Recommended Reading

Recently published papers of particular interest have been highlighted as:

* Of importance

** Of major importance

  • 1.Demmler GJ. Infectious Diseases Society of America and Centers for Disease Control. Summary of a workshop on surveillance for congenital cytomegalovirus disease. Rev Infect Dis. 1991;13(2):315–329. doi: 10.1093/clinids/13.2.315. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2**.Ross DS, Dollard SC, Victor M, Sumartojo E, Cannon MJ. The epidemiology and prevention of congenital cytomegalovirus infection and disease: activities of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Workgroup. J Womens Health (Larchmt) 2006;15(3):224–229. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2006.15.224. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Outstanding and comprehensive data set examining the epidemiology of CMV infections in the United States.
  • 3**.Colugnati F, Staras S, Dollard S, Cannon M. Incidence of cytomegalovirus infection among the general population and pregnant women in the United States. BMC Infect Dis. 2007;7(1):71. doi: 10.1186/1471-2334-7-71. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Valuable review of the available information regarding risk to women of child-bearing age for transmission of CMV during pregnancy.
  • 4.Adler SP. Cytomegalovirus and child day care. Evidence for an increased infection rate among day-care workers. N Engl J Med. 1989;321(19):1290–6. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198911093211903. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Stagno S, Pass RF, Cloud G, Britt WJ, Henderson RE, Walton PD, Veren DA, Page F, Alford CA. Primary cytomegalovirus infection in pregnancy. Incidence, transmission to fetus, and clinical outcome. JAMA. 1986;256(14):1904–8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Kenneson A, Cannon MJ. Review and meta-analysis of the epidemiology of congenital cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection. Rev Med Virol. 2007;17(4):253–76. doi: 10.1002/rmv.535. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Boppana SB, Fowler KB, Britt WJ, Stagno S, Pass RF. Symptomatic congenital cytomegalovirus infection in infants born to mothers with preexisting immunity to cytomegalovirus. Pediatrics. 1999;104:55–60. doi: 10.1542/peds.104.1.55. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8*.Ahlfors K, Ivarsson SA, Harris S. Report on a long-term study of maternal and congenital cytomegalovirus infection in Sweden. Review of prospective studies available in the literature. Scand J Infect Dis. 1999;31:443–57. doi: 10.1080/00365549950163969. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; First study to demonstrate significant risk to fetus infected in utero even in women with preconceptual immunity to CMV.
  • 9*.Boppana SB, Rivera LB, Fowler KB, Mach M, Britt WJ. Intrauterine transmission of cytomegalovirus to infants of women with preconceptional immunity. N Engl J Med. 2001;344:1366–71. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200105033441804. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Women with preconceptual immunity to CMV can be reinfected with new strains of the virus, resulting in symptomatic infection of the fetus.
  • 10.Ahlfors K, Harris S. Secondary maternal cytomegalovirus infection - a significant cause of congenital disease. Pediatrics. 2001;107:1227–8. doi: 10.1542/peds.107.5.1227. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Schleiss MR. Role of breast milk in acquisition of cytomegalovirus infection: recent advances. Curr Opin Pediatr. 2006;18(1):48–52. doi: 10.1097/01.mop.0000192520.48411.fa. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Pass RF, Stagno S, Myers GJ, Alford CA. Outcome of symptomatic congenital cytomegalovirus infection: results of long-term longitudinal follow-up. Pediatrics. 1980;66(5):758–762. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Noyola DE, Demmler GJ, Nelson CT, et al. Early predictors of neurodevelopmental outcome in symptomatic congenital cytomegalovirus infection. J Pediatr. 2001 Mar;138(3):325–331. doi: 10.1067/mpd.2001.112061. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Boppana SB, Fowler KB, Vaid Y, et al. Neuroradiographic findings in the newborn period and long-term outcome in children with symptomatic congenital cytomegalovirus infection. Pediatrics. 1997 Mar;99(3):409–414. doi: 10.1542/peds.99.3.409. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Kylat RI, Kelly EN, Ford-Jones EL. Clinical findings and adverse outcome in neonates with symptomatic congenital cytomegalovirus (SCCMV) infection. Eur J Pediatr. 2006 Nov;165(11):773–778. doi: 10.1007/s00431-006-0172-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Sharon B, Schleiss MR. Congenital cytomegalovirus infection: an unrecognized epidemic. Infections in Medicine. 2007;24(9):402–15. [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Ancora G, Lanari M, Lazzarotto T, et al. Cranial ultrasound scanning and prediction of outcome in newborns with congenital cytomegalovirus infection. J Pediatr. 2007;150(2):157–161. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2006.11.032. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Boesch C, Issakainen J, Kewitz G, Kikinis R, Martin E, Boltshauser E. Magnetic resonance imaging of the brain in congenital cytomegalovirus infection. Pediatr Radiol. 1989;19(2):91–93. doi: 10.1007/BF02387893. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Stagno S, Pass RF, Dworsky ME, et al. Congenital cytomegalovirus infection: The relative importance of primary and recurrent maternal infection. N Engl J Med. 1982;306(16):945–949. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198204223061601. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Boppana SB, Pass RF, Britt WJ, Stagno S, Alford CA. Symptomatic congenital cytomegalovirus infection: neonatal morbidity and mortality. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 1992;11(2):93–99. doi: 10.1097/00006454-199202000-00007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Conboy TJ, Pass RF, Stagno S, et al. Intellectual development in school-aged children with asymptomatic congenital cytomegalovirus infection. Pediatrics. 1986;77(6):801–806. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22**.Bale JF, Miner L, Petheram SJ. Congenital cytomegalovirus infection. Curr Treat Options Neurol. 2002;4(3):225–230. doi: 10.1007/s11940-002-0039-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; **Outstanding review of congenital CMV with emphasis on neurodevelopmental sequelae.
  • 23*.Dahle AJ, Fowler KB, Wright JD, Boppana SB, Britt WJ, Pass RF. Longitudinal investigation of hearing disorders in children with congenital cytomegalovirus. J Am Acad Audiol. 2000 May;11(5):283–290. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; *Impact of congenital CMV on hearing outcomes in congenitally infected newborns may take years to become evident.
  • 24.Hicks T, Fowler K, Richardson M, Dahle A, Adams L, Pass R. Congenital cytomegalovirus infection and neonatal auditory screening. J Pediatr. 1993;123(5):779–782. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3476(05)80859-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Iwasaki S, Yamashita M, Maeda M, Misawa K, Mineta H. Audiological outcome of infants with congenital cytomegalovirus infection in a prospective study. Audiol Neurootol. 2007;12(1):31–36. doi: 10.1159/000096156. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Madden C, Wiley S, Schleiss M, et al. Audiometric, clinical and educational outcomes in a pediatric symptomatic congenital cytomegalovirus (CMV) population with sensorineural hearing loss. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2005 Sep;69(9):1191–1198. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2005.03.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Fowler KB, McCollister FP, Dahle AJ, Boppana S, Britt WJ, Pass RF. Progressive and fluctuating sensorineural hearing loss in children with asymptomatic congenital cytomegalovirus infection. J Pediatr. 1997 Apr;130(4):624–630. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3476(97)70248-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Rivera LB, Boppana SB, Fowler KB, Britt WJ, Stagno S, Pass RF. Predictors of hearing loss in children with symptomatic congenital cytomegalovirus infection. Pediatrics. 2002;110(4):762–767. doi: 10.1542/peds.110.4.762. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Boppana SB, Fowler KB, Pass RF, et al. Congenital cytomegalovirus infection: association between virus burden in infancy and hearing loss. J Pediatr. 2005;146(6):817–823. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2005.01.059. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Pass RF. Congenital cytomegalovirus infection and hearing loss. Herpes. 2005;12(2):50–55. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Barbi M, Binda S, Caroppo S. Diagnosis of congenital CMV infection via dried blood spots. Rev Med Virol. 2006;16(6):385–392. doi: 10.1002/rmv.517. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Schleiss MR. Antiviral therapy of congenital cytomegalovirus infection. Semin Pediatr Infect Dis. 2005;16(1):50–59. doi: 10.1053/j.spid.2004.09.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33**.Kimberlin DW, Lin CY, Sanchez PJ, et al. Effect of ganciclovir therapy on hearing in symptomatic congenital cytomegalovirus disease involving the central nervous system: a randomized, controlled trial. J Pediatr. 2003;143(1):16–25. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3476(03)00192-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; **Controlled trial demonstrating impact of antiviral therapy on hearing-related outcomes in infants with symptomatic congenital CMV infection. [Class I]
  • 34*.Nigro G, Adler SP, La Torre R, Best AM. Passive immunization during pregnancy for congenital cytomegalovirus infection. N Engl J Med. 2005 Sep 29;353(13):1350–1362. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa043337. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; *Uncontrolled but provocative study suggesting benefit of in utero therapy in women with primary cytomegalovirus during pregnancy with CMV-specific immune globulin. [Class III]
  • 35.Duff P. Immunotherapy for congenital cytomegalovirus infection. N Engl J Med. 2005 Sep 29;353(13):1402–1404. doi: 10.1056/NEJMe058172. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES