Abstract
Background
The evolution of mycoplasmas from a common ancestor with Firmicutes has been characterized not only by genome down-sizing but also by horizontal gene transfer between mycoplasma species sharing a common host. The mechanisms of these gene transfers remain unclear because our knowledge of the mycoplasma mobile genetic elements is limited. In particular, only a few plasmids have been described within the Mycoplasma genus.
Results
We have shown that several species of ruminant mycoplasmas carry plasmids that are members of a large family of elements and replicate via a rolling-circle mechanism. All plasmids were isolated from species that either belonged or were closely related to the Mycoplasma mycoides cluster; none was from the Mycoplasma bovis-Mycoplasma agalactiae group. Twenty one plasmids were completely sequenced, named and compared with each other and with the five mycoplasma plasmids previously reported. All plasmids share similar size and genetic organization, and present a mosaic structure. A peculiar case is that of the plasmid pMyBK1 from M. yeatsii; it is larger in size and is predicted to be mobilizable. Its origin of replication and replication protein were identified. In addition, pMyBK1 derivatives were shown to replicate in various species of the M. mycoides cluster, and therefore hold considerable promise for developing gene vectors. The phylogenetic analysis of these plasmids confirms the uniqueness of pMyBK1 and indicates that the other mycoplasma plasmids cluster together, apart from the related replicons found in phytoplasmas and in species of the clade Firmicutes.
Conclusions
Our results unraveled a totally new picture of mycoplasma plasmids. Although they probably play a limited role in the gene exchanges that participate in mycoplasma evolution, they are abundant in some species. Evidence for the occurrence of frequent genetic recombination strongly suggests they are transmitted between species sharing a common host or niche.
Keywords: Mycoplasma,Plasmid,Replication,Rep protein,Gene transfer,Evolution,Expression vector,Mycoplasma mycoides,Mycoplasma capricolum,Mycoplasma yeatsii
Background
Horizontal gene transfer (HGT) is recognized as the major force in bacterial genome evolution (for review see: [1]). It has contributed to the diversity of bacterial species and to the success of bacterial colonization of almost all the possible niches on earth. HGT events have been detected in most bacteria for which genome sequences are available. Yet many questions remain about the dynamics of gene exchange and the mechanisms underlying these DNA transfers. Some bacterial species seem particularly well equipped for sharing DNA at high frequency (for review see: [2]). These bacteria present an abundance of different mobile genetic elements (MGE) and have other characteristics such as natural competence, efficient machinery for homologous recombination and numerous secretion systems that favor gene exchange. For other bacteria with limited MGE repertoire and routes of DNA transfer, the means of genetic exchange are not so obvious.
The class Mollicutes is a group of wall-less bacteria that colonize a variety of hosts, from plants to humans, and are characterized by a small genome with a low G+C content [3,4]. Mollicutes are thought to have evolved from a common ancestor with Firmicutes through successive genome losses [5]. This drastic evolution resulted in some mollicutes, such as Mycoplasma genitalium, having a cell with a highly reduced genome that is considered the best representative of a natural minimal cell [6]. However, genome down-sizing was not the sole force operating during evolution because it has been shown that mollicutes were also able to exchange genetic material through HGT. Indeed, comparative genomics of ruminant mycoplasmas predicted that up to 18% of the Mycoplasma agalactiae genome has undergone HGT with mycoplasmas of the distinct Mycoplasma mycoides cluster [4]. A smaller amount of HGT has also been detected between two bird pathogens M. gallisepticum and M. synoviae, and between two human urogenital pathogens, M. hominis and Ureaplasma parvum[7,8]. Obviously, sharing a common host was a requisite for HGT but the underlying mechanisms behind these HGT events have yet to be described. A number of MGE, including integrative and conjugative elements (ICEs), insertion sequences (IS), phages and plasmids, have been described in these bacteria and are potential candidates for mediating these genetic transfers.
Although usually abundant in species belonging to the phylum Firmicutes, only a few plasmids have been described in the different genera of the Mollicutes (Figure 1). They were first detected in the genus Spiroplasma[11,12] and later proved widely distributed in this genus [13]. Spiroplasma plasmids that have a size ranging from 5 to more than 30 kbp were initially termed cryptic as no specific phenotype was associated with their presence. However, some of these plasmids carry genetic determinants that play a role in the transmission of the Spiroplasma citri by its vector insect [14,15]. Within Mollicutes, the other phytopathogen organisms are phytoplasmas that remain yet uncultivated. In several Candidatus phytoplasma species, plasmids with a size range from 2.6 to 10.8 kbp have also been described (for a review see [16]). Unlike the spiroplasma plasmids for which no homology was detected in databases, all the phytoplasma plasmids encode a replication protein sharing similarities with the Rep proteins involved in rolling-circle replication (RCR) [17,18]. For the genus Mycoplasma, which includes over 100 species, among which are significant pathogens of animals and humans [19], only five plasmid sequences are available in databases [20-23] (Figure 1). All 5 plasmids have been isolated in Mycoplasma species belonging to the Spiroplasma phylogenetic group but are not related to the ones described in Spiroplasma species. Four are from closely related species of the M. mycoides cluster and three of them (pADB201, pKMK1, and pMmc-95010) are from the same sub-species, M. mycoides subsp. capri (Mmc). In contrast to the apparent scarcity of mycoplasma plasmids, other investigators have reported a much higher prevalence of strains with plasmids but these data were only based on agarose gel detection of extrachromosomal DNA, without DNA sequencing [24].
The present work was conducted in order to better comprehend the nature and extend of the plasmid repertoire of two main groups of ruminant mycoplasmas: the M. agalactiae-M. bovis group and the species found within or close to the M. mycoides cluster, two phylogenetically distant groups between which a high level of HGT has been predicted in silico [4] (Figure 1). Several plasmids were isolated from various species and completely sequenced. Comparative analyses indicated that, except for the recently described pMyBK1 from M. yeatsii[25], all plasmids belong to the same large family of rolling-circle replicons found in Firmicutes. Plasmid pMYBK1 represents a new family of replicons that can be transformed and maintained in other mycoplasma species. The study further indicates that plasmids can be commonly found in several Mycoplasma species colonizing ruminants and therefore, could contribute to the genetic transfers that have been revealed by comparative genomics.
Methods
Mycoplasma strains, growth conditions and DNA purification
All mycoplasma strains used in this study (Table 1) are kept in the collection maintained by the Anses laboratory of Lyon and most of them were isolated as part of the activities of the Vigimyc network [26]. They were cultivated at 37°C in Mycoplasma broth base supplemented as for SP4 medium [27]. Mycoplasma transformants were sub-cultured in modified Hayflick broth [28] supplemented with 0.4% (w/v) pyruvate, 0.2% (w/v) glucose and 5–15 μg of tetracycline mL-1. Spiroplasma citri was grown at 32°C in SP4 broth withoutfresh yeast extract. Escherichia coli DH10B was used as the host strain in cloning experiments and was grown in LB medium supplemented with 100 μg.ml-1 of ampicillin for selection.
Table 1.
Taxon | Strain name | Plasmid name | Reference | GenBank access n° | Plasmid size |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
M. leachii |
99/0361 |
pBG7AU |
Djordjevik et al. 2001 |
AF257325 |
1022 bp |
|
CIRAD063*++ |
pBG7AU |
this work |
/ |
1022 bp |
Mmc |
GM12 |
pKMK1 |
King & Dybvig, 1992 |
M81470 |
1875bp |
|
GC1176-2 |
pADB201 |
Bergemann et al. 1989 |
M25059 |
1717 bp |
|
95010 |
pMmc-95010 |
Thiaucourt et al. 2011 |
FQ790215 |
1840 bp |
|
13071 |
pMmc-95010-3 |
this work |
/a |
1839 bp |
|
14227 |
pMG1A-1 |
this work |
JX294729 |
1865 bp |
|
L |
pMmc-95010-2 |
this work |
/ |
1802 bp |
|
4343 |
pMG1C-1 |
this work |
JX294730 |
1770 bp |
M. yeatsii |
GIH (TS) |
pMyBK1 |
Kent et al. 2012 |
EU429323 |
3432 bp |
|
GIH (TS) |
pMG2B-1 |
this work |
JX294731 |
1573bp |
|
11181 |
pMG2F-1 |
this work |
JX294732 |
1656 bp |
|
15000 |
pMG2F-2 |
this work |
/ |
1652 bp |
M. cottewii |
VIS (TS) |
pMG2C-1 |
this work |
JX294733 |
1565 bp |
|
15104 |
pMG2E-1 |
this work |
JX294734 |
1041 bp |
Mcc |
14425 |
pMG1B-1 |
this work |
JX294737 |
1732bp |
|
14667 |
pMG1B-2 |
this work |
/ |
1731 bp |
|
15301 |
pMG1B-3 |
this work |
/ |
1731 bp |
|
5145 |
pMG1B-4 |
this work |
/ |
1733 bp |
|
15250 |
pMG1B-5 |
this work |
/ |
1732 bp |
|
15216 |
pMG1B-6 |
this work |
/ |
1734 bp |
|
14250 |
pMG2A-1 |
this work |
JX294735 |
1573 bp |
|
11186 |
pMG2D-1 |
this work |
JX294736 |
1722 bp |
|
14141 |
pMG2D-2 |
this work |
/ |
1720 bp |
|
14332 |
pMG2D-3 |
this work |
/ |
1718 bp |
4142 | pMG2D-4 | this work | / | 1720 bp |
a the sequences for which the plasmid is the representative of a series have been deposited in GenBank.
Mycoplasma and spiroplasma genomic DNA were prepared using the Wizard Genomic DNA Purification kit (Promega) or by standard phenol/chloroform procedures. Plasmid DNA was purified using either the Wizard SV Minipreps DNA purification kit (Promega) or QIAprep Spin Miniprep Kit (Qiagen) with the low-copy plasmid protocol. When several plasmids were present, as in M. yeatsii GIH TS, the individual bands visualized on agarose gel were purified following an agarase (AgarACE™, Promega) treatment.
Screening mycoplasma strains for the presence of plasmids
The presence of plasmid was screened by agarose gel electrophoresis of 1 μg of genomic DNA extracted from cells collected from stationary phase cultures.
Determination of plasmid copy number
The copy number of pMyBK1 and pMG2B-1 was estimated by gel assay as previously described [29] except that lysozyme treatment was omitted. Serial twofold dilutions of the genomic DNA extracted from a logarithmic phase culture of M. yeatsii GIHT were analyzed by 0.8% (w/v) agarose gel electrophoresis. After ethidium bromide staining, the relative intensities of individual bands, both plasmid and chromosome, were quantified using the ImageJ software [30]. The copy numbers of pMyBK1 and pMG2B-1 were derived from the intensity of each band taking into account their respective sizes. The plasmid copy number was also quantified by real-time PCR as reported earlier by others [31]. Amplification and detection were carried out using a Roche LightCycler 480 (Roche Diagnostics) using a SYBR green/fluorescein mix (Applied Biosystem). The glycerol kinase gene glpk was chosen as the reference gene, because it is a conserved single-copy gene that is chromosomally encoded. Fragments of chromosomal glpk (123 bp), pMyBK1 cdsB (90 bp) and pMG2B-1 rep (87 bp) were amplified with primers glpkF/R, cdsBF/R and pMG2B-1F/R, respectively (Additional file 1: Table S1). The amplification efficiencies were determined through serial tenfold dilutions of the DNA samples using the LightCycler 480 software and were shown to be similar for each target gene, namely glpk, cdsB and rep. The relative copy number N of pMyBK1 or pMG2B-1 plasmids was calculated by the following formula: N relative = (1+E)-ΔCt, where E and ΔCt represent the PCR amplification efficiency and the difference between the cycle threshold number (Ct) of glpk and cdsB or rep reaction, respectively. The experiment was performed in triplicate.
DNA sequencing and sequence analyses
Purified mycoplasma plasmids were linearized using a restriction enzyme (EcoRI, EcoRV or HindIII) and were then sub-cloned into the pBluescript vector linearized with the same enzyme. The resulting plasmids were sequenced using T7 and T3 universal primers or by primer-walking when necessary. When there was not a unique restriction site within the plasmid, multiple restriction fragments were individually sub-cloned and sequenced. The nucleotide sequences were determined by means of at least two overlapping reads on each strand of the whole plasmids. When necessary, complementary plasmid sequences were obtained by direct sequencing of PCR products (for the list of PCR primers see Additional file 1: Table S1). The plasmid sequences determined in this study have been deposited in the GenBank database under the following accession numbers: JX294729 for pMG1A-1, JX294730 for pMG1C-1, JX294731 for pMG2B-1, JX294732 for pMG2F-1, JX294733 for pMG2C-1, JX294734 for pMG2E-1, JX294735 for pMG2A-1, JX294736 for pMG2D-1 and JX294737 for pMG1B-1 (Table 1).
Coding sequences (CDSs) were searched using the AMIGene software ([32], http://www.genoscope.cns.fr/agc/tools/amigene/). Database searches and comparisons of DNA sequences or DNA-derived protein sequences were carried out using BLAST programs (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/blast/). Conserved domains were detected by CD-Search against the CDD resource from NCBI [33]. Protein secondary structures were predicted from sequences using the SOPM method [34]. DNA repeats were identified using the software RepFind [35], nucleic acid folding and calculation of free energy for hairpin formation were determined using the Mfold program [36]. Multiple sequence alignments were performed with T-Coffee [37] or ClustalW2 softwares [38]. Subsequent phylogenetic analyses were performed with the Mega 5 software [10] using the neighbor-joining or the maximum likelihood method. Multiple-way pairwise comparisons of plasmid nucleic sequences were conducted with the Artemis Comparison Tool, ACT [39].
Southern blot hybridization and immunoblotting
The detection of ssDNA intermediates was performed by Southern blot hybridization and S1 nuclease treatment as described previously by others [40]. Total M. yeatsii GIH TS genomic DNA, treated or not with S1 nuclease (10 U/μg of DNA for 15 min at room temperature) was electrophoresed using a 0.8% agarose gel and transferred without prior denaturation to a nylon membrane (Nytran SuPerCharge) by vacuum blotting in 10X SSC buffer (Vacuum Blotter; MP Biomedicals). The air-dried membrane was then UV cross-linked before hybridization with the pMyBK1 [digoxigenin]dUTP-labelled probe using standard stringency conditions. Hybridization signals were detected with anti-digoxigenin-alkaline phosphatase conjugate and CDP-Star as the substrate, according to the manufacturer's instructions (Roche Applied Science). The pMyBK1 probe was generated by PCR amplification with primer pair pMyBK1-F1/R2 (Additional file 1: Table S1).
For protein immunobloting, 107–108 c.f.u. from M. yeatsii and M. capricolum subsp. capricolum (Mcc) late-exponential-phase cultures were spotted under vacuum onto a nitrocellulose membrane. Immunoblotting was carried out as described previously [41] except that the binding of spiralin-antibodies was visualized by using a goat anti-rabbit immunoglobulin G–peroxidase conjugate and the Super Signal West Pico chemoluminescent substrate (Pierce).
Plasmid constructs and transformation experiments
Several derivatives of pMyBK1 (pCM-H, pCM-P, pCM-C, pCM-K1-5) were constructed by inserting BglII-digested amplification products from pMyBK1 (BglII site in the primer sequences) into BglII-linearized pSRT2 [42]. Primers used for amplification of fragments from pMyBK1 are listed in Additional file 1: Table S1. In each construct (see Results section and Figure 2), the CDSs of pMyBK1 were kept in the same orientation as that of the pSRT2 tetM gene. To produce pCM-K3-spi, the spiralin gene and its promoter were amplified from S. citri GII3 genomic DNA with primer pair SpiERI-F/R, prior to restriction with EcoRI and ligation into EcoRI-linearized pCM-K3. In pCM-K1ΔB, the CDSB of pCM-K1 was disrupted by a 4-bp insertion creating a unique XhoI site. To introduce the 4-bp frameshift mutation, the amplification product of pCM-K1 using DeltacdsB-F/DeltacdsB-R primers was restricted by XhoI before circularization by self-ligation.
Electrotransformation of S. citri was carried out as previously described [43] with 1–5 μg of DNA. Polyethylene glycol-mediated transformation of mycoplasmas was performed as described previously [44] with 5–10 μg of plasmid and transformants were selected by plating on medium containing 5–15 μg.ml−1 of tetracycline.
Results and discussion
Detection and initial characterization of plasmids from ruminant mycoplasmas
A total of 194 ruminant mycoplasma strains were selected from our collection on the basis that there was no apparent epidemiological link between them. Their distribution amongst taxa is summarized in Table 2. No plasmid was detected in species belonging to the Hominis phylogenetic group, i.e. in the M. bovis and M. agalactiae species. In contrast, several plasmids were detected in strains belonging to the M. mycoides cluster or to closely related species of the Spiroplasma phylogenetic group (Table 2). Indeed, 37 out of the 112 strains screened (33%) were found to carry plasmids. Although plasmids have already been described for strains belonging to the Mmc, M. yeatsii and M. leachii species, this is the first report of plasmids in M. cottewii and Mcc. While nearly all strains carried a single plasmid, the M. yeatsii (GIH) type strain contained two plasmids. Except for the larger plasmid of M. yeatsii GIH TS (3.4 kbp), all other plasmids had apparent sizes of 1.0 to 2.0 kbp. Also, no correlation between the presence of plasmid and the history of the strains such as the year and/or place of isolation, and the host species (bovine versus caprine), could be established (Additional file 2: Table S2).
Table 2.
Phylogenetic group | Taxon | nb of screened strains a | strains with plasmidb |
---|---|---|---|
Hominis |
M. agalactiae |
40 |
0 |
|
M. bovis |
42 |
0 |
|
Subtotal |
82 |
0 |
Spiroplasma |
M. mycoides subsp. capri |
43 |
12 |
|
M. capricolum subsp. capricolum |
41 |
15 |
|
M. leachii |
10 |
1 |
|
M. yeatsii |
16 |
7 |
|
M. cottewii |
2 |
2 |
|
Subtotal |
112 |
37 |
Total | 194 | 37 |
(a) including the species type strain.
(b) as visualized on agarose gel after total DNA extraction by phenol/chloroform.
Twenty one plasmids, at least one per taxon, were randomly chosen and fully sequenced. Plasmid sizes ranged from 1,041 bp to 1,865 bp. To assess the diversity and genetic variability of mycoplasma plasmids, the 21 sequences were compared to each other and to those of the five mycoplasma plasmids available in GenBank: pADB201, pKMK1, and pMmc95010 from Mmc, pBG7AU from M. leachii, and pMyBK1 from M. yeatsii (Table 1). The overall nucleotide identity was calculated after a global alignment for each plasmid-pair. Within individual taxa, pairwise nucleotide identities varied from 100% to less than 40% (Additional file 3: Table S3). Indeed, the sequence of the plasmid that we isolated from a M. leachii strain was found to be identical to that of the previously described pBG7AU. This result is not surprising since the 2 M. leachii strains, though distinct, were recovered from the same outbreak in Australia [21]. Similarly, the 2 field strains of M. yeatsii were shown to harbor plasmids that are 97% identical. In this case, however, the strains sharing the same geographical origin were isolated 8 years apart. In contrast, the 2 plasmids isolated from the M. cottewii species were shown to have different sizes (1,565 vs 1,041 bp) and nucleotide sequences (42% identity only). The pMyBK1 plasmid, sequenced by others (Genbank accession # EU429323; [25]) and also found in the M. yeatsii type strain, is certainly a particular case because of its larger size (3,422 bp) and low nucleotide identity (20-37%) in comparison to other mycoplasma plasmids.
Proposed nomenclature for mycoplasma plasmids
With the description of this fairly large set of plasmids, a proposal for a new nomenclature of mycoplasma plasmids seemed justified. First, we considered that there was no need to give a different name to a plasmid that was found identical to a previously described replicon (e.g. pBG7AU). For the plasmids that are very close to each other (nucleotide identity & 95%), we considered that they were variants and should be given the same name followed by the suffix “-n” where n indicated the number by chronological order in this series of plasmids (Table 1); the plasmid with the suffix “-1” being the prototype of the plasmid series (e.g. pMG1A-1). This same rule was used for variants of plasmids described by others (e.g. pMmc-95010-2). Finally, the plasmids were separated into two groups (G1 and G2) according to their rep sequences (see below). According to this nomenclature, we identified 9 new plasmids (pMG1A-1, pMG1B-1, pMG1C-1, pMG2A-1, pMG2B-1, pMG2C-1, pMG2D-1, pMG2E-1 and pMG2F-1) and 11 variants of these plasmids or of plasmids previously reported. Sequences of these 9 new plasmids have been deposited in GenBank (Table 1).
Mycoplasma plasmids share a common genetic organization
With the exception of pMyBK1for which a specific analysis is provided further, all plasmids shared the same overall genetic organization, similar to those of pMmc-95010 [23] and pMV158, a small, broad-host-range plasmid, originally isolated from Streptococcus agalactiae that is considered the prototype of the rolling circle replicating plasmid family [45] (Figure 3A). It consists of two CDSs transcribed in the same direction, followed by an inverted repeat sequence ended by a stretch of thymidine residues that is typical of rho-independent transcription terminators (Tcr; Figure 3A).
The first CDS encodes a 43–53 aa polypeptide predicted to be the transcriptional regulator CopG by homology to that of pMV158 (Figure 3C). Despite the low similarity level between the predicted polypeptides, the key amino-acids within a predicted helix-turn-helix structure are conserved (Figure 3C). In pMV158, the CopG protein regulates the plasmid copy number through the control of coprep mRNA synthesis. Furthermore, the copy number of pMV158 is also controlled through a small counter-transcribed RNA (ctRNA) [47]. In agreement with this type of regulation, the corresponding transcription signals (promoter Pct and rho independent terminator Tct; Figure 4A) were predicted on the complementary strand in between the two CDS of the various plasmids (Additional file 4: Figure S1).
The second CDS encodes a 196–225 aa polypeptide that was annotated as the replication protein, Rep in pADB201, again by homology to pMV158. All predicted Rep proteins shared a Rep2 domain (Plasmid replication protein, pfam01719). These Rep proteins are known to function as topoisomerases that nick the positive strand at the leading strand origin of replication (dso) during rolling-circle replication [48]. Multiple sequence alignments revealed that the Rep proteins of mycoplasma plasmids shared five conserved motifs (I to V) initially described in the Rep proteins from the pMV158 family [46] (Figure 4D). Consistent with this finding, a double-strand origin (dso) typical of pMV158 family was identified upstream of copG (Figure 4B). These dso shared a conserved cleavage site TACTAC(C)G/A between two inverted repeats. The other replication origin, the lagging-strand initiation site (sso), was also predicted upstream of the dso by analogy with results obtained for other mycoplasma plasmids [22,23] (data not shown). Therefore, replication of all mycoplasma plasmids is likely to be driven through a rolling-circle mechanism by a Rep protein of the pMV158 family type.
Mosaic structure of the mycoplasma plasmids is indicative of recombination events
In spite of a conserved structure, multiple pair-wise DNA sequence comparisons indicated that mycoplasma plasmids are in fact a mosaic of rep, dso, copG, and sso blocks. This was evidenced by the occurrence of several local regions of homology detected by using the BLAST program (Figure 5). Pairs of plasmids that show a high level of identity for the Rep sequence (e.g. pKMK1 and pMG1B-1; pMG2D-1 and pMG2B-1) do not necessarily share a high degree of identity for the region upstream of copG. Interestingly, high sequence identity for the region spanning sso was found to be indicative of plasmids being hosted by the same mycoplasma species. For instance, the following plasmid-pairs, pADB201 and pKMK1, pMG1B-1 and pMG2D-1, and pMG2B-1 and pMG2F-2 were isolated from Mmc, Mcc, and M. yeatsii, respectively (Figure 5). This result is consistent with the fact that during replication this region interacts with chromosome-encoded components [18]. Further degrees of mosaicism were found in particular cases such as for pMG2D-1, in which two putative dso showing sequence heterogeneity are found. Other examples of genetic variability are the small size of pBG7AU and the unusual location of the dso in pMG2F-2. Such a mosaic structure is clearly indicative of successive recombination events between replicons.
pMyBK1 is a unique representative of a new replicon family
As indicated above, M. yeatsii strain GIH TS was the only strain that yielded a banding pattern of extrachromosomal DNA that suggested the presence of two distinct plasmids (Figure 5A). The small plasmid, pMG2B-1, was shown to belong to the pMV158 family like all other mycoplasma plasmids (Figure 3). In contrast, the larger plasmid (3,432 bp) named pMyBK1 (GenBank Accession number EU429323; [25]) has a genetic organization that sets it apart from the other mycoplasma plasmids. Initial database searches using pMyBK1 sequence as a query indicated low identity with other plasmids and prompted us to further analyze this plasmid that might represent a new family of replicons.
First, the relative copy number of each plasmid of M. yeatsii GIHT, pMG2B-1 and pMyBK1, was evaluated by two different methods (gel assay and real-time PCR). Both methods yielded similar results with estimated copy number of 154–170 copies/cell and of 56–60 copies/cell for pMyBK1 and pMG2B-1, respectively (Figure 5B). Such a difference strongly suggests that the two plasmids have distinct replication and /or regulation systems. Together the 2 M. yeatsii plasmids represent a total extrachromosomal DNA amount of 636 kbp per cell, which is approximately 37% of the total cell DNA.
Next, the genetic structure of pMyBK1 was analyzed. The 2 CDSs found in the pMyBK1 sequence (CDSA and B, encoding polypeptides of respectively 519 and 272 aa) showed no homolog with other mycoplasma plasmids (Figure 2A). The presence of a 192-bp intergenic region between the CDSs as well as the predicted rho-independent transcription terminator immediately downstream of each CDS strongly suggests that the 2 CDSs are transcribed independently rather than as a single operon. The deduced amino acid sequence of pMyBK1 CDSA exhibits low but significant similarity with mobilization proteins of various bacteria. The N-terminal part of the CDSA protein contains a Mob/Pre domain (pfam01076) typical for relaxases of the MobV superfamily that includes proteins involved in conjugative mobilization and plasmid intramolecular recombination [49]. Sequence alignments with representatives of the MobV family clearly showed that the CDSA protein did possess the three conserved motifs of the family [50] (data not shown). Subsequent phylogenetic analyses of the CDSA polypeptide with the complete set of MobV proteins described by Garcillan-Barcia [51] classified the pMyBK1 protein within the MobV4 relaxase family (data not shown).
In contrast to CDSA, no functional domain or characteristic secondary structure was identified in the CDSB-encoded protein. Blast searches revealed that the CDSB protein of pMyBK1 shared significant homology with five chromosome-encoded proteins of Mcc, strain California Kid, or M. leachii, strain PG50 and 99/014/6 but with no known associated function.
Identification of the replication protein and the mode of replication of pMyBK1
Since none of the pMyBK1-encoded proteins share homology to known replication proteins, CDSA and CDSB were both regarded as putative candidates. To identify the replication protein and delineate the replication region of pMyBK1, a series of deletion and frameshift mutations were introduced in a shuttle plasmid (E. coli/M. yeatsii), named pCM-H, that was constructed by combining pMyBK1 to a colE1 replicon carrying the tetM tetracycline resistance gene as the selection marker (Figure 2A). The mutated plasmids were then introduced into a plasmid-free M. yeatsii strain (#13156 from the Anses collection) by PEG-transformation, and their replication capacity was measured by the number of resulting tetracycline resistant colonies. Plasmids pCM-P and pCM-K1 contain respectively CDSA and CDSB, associated with the flanking intergenic regions (Figure 2A). No transformant was obtained with pCM-P, confirming that CDSA, which encodes a putative Mob protein (see before), is not the replication protein and that none of the intergenic regions is sufficient to sustain plasmid replication. In contrast, the replication of pCM-K1 in M. yeatsii was abolished after introducing a frameshift mutation that disrupts CDSB (pCM-K1 ΔB in Figure 2A). This strongly argues for CDSB encoding the replication protein of pMyBK1, a result that confirms recent findings [25]. Successive reductions of the region downstream of CDSB, including the GC rich sequence located immediately upstream of CDSA of the native plasmid, led to a minimal replicon pCM-K4 of 1,297 bp (Figure 2A). In pCM-K4, the region downstream of CDSB is characterized by the presence of two sets of direct repeats. In addition, a 44-bp partially palindromic sequence with the potential to form a stable stem-loop structure (ΔG = −8.71 kcal/mol) is located immediately downstream of the direct repeat region. Interestingly, this structure was found to be essential for plasmid replication as deletion of the stem-loop 5’arm in pCM-K5 totally abolished plasmid replication (Figure 3A).
Detection of single-stranded (ssDNA) intermediates, generated during replication, is the hallmark of plasmids replicating via a rolling-circle mechanism [40,52]. After treatment of some of the DNA samples with ssDNA-specific nuclease S1, total DNAs from M. yeatsii GIH TS were separated by agarose gel electrophoresis before being transferred to nylon membranes under non-denaturating conditions. Hybridization with the pMyBK1 probe could only be detected when S1-nuclease treatment was omitted (Additional file 5: Figure S2). The hybridization signal was completely absent in the corresponding, S1-nuclease treated samples (Additional file 5: Figure S2). These results confirmed the existence of ssDNA intermediates and indicate that pMyBK1 probably replicates via the RCR mechanism. Since CDSB protein has no similarity with any known replication protein, pMyBK1 is therefore considered as the first member of a new RCR replicon family.
Host specificity of pMyBK1
The lack of significant similarity between the putative Rep of pMyBK1 and the Rep proteins from other mycoplasma plasmids confirms that pMyBK1 belongs to a previously unknown class of RCR plasmids. However, the fact that pMyBK1 is hosted by a mycoplasma species (M. yeatsii) sharing a common host (goat) and body site (ear canal) with other ruminant mycoplasmas [53,54] raises the question of the putative dissemination of this plasmid. Therefore, the ability of pMyBK1 derivatives to replicate in various mollicute species of the Mycoplasma and Spiroplasma genera was evaluated. Using the standard PEG-transformation protocol, the pMyBK1-derivatives pCM-K3/4 (Figure 2B) were successfully introduced into the following plasmid-free strains: M. yeatsii #13156, M. putrefaciens KS1 TS, M. leachii PG50 TS and Mcc California kid TS. The autonomous replication of the pMyBK1 derivatives in these species was confirmed by plasmid purification and back-transformation of E. coli with the purified plasmids. Transformation of Mmc with pCM-K3/4 also yielded many tetracycline resistant transformants, but no free plasmid could be detected despite the positive PCR amplification of CDSB. These results suggest an integration of the pMyBK1 derivative into the host chromosome of this species, as it has been previously described for oriC plasmids [55]. Attempts to transform M. mycoides subsp. mycoides or Spiroplasma citri with pCM-K3 repeatedly failed. Interestingly, we also showed that pMyBK1 not only replicated in various mycoplasma species but was also able to express heterologous genes. The spiralin gene encoding the major surface protein of S. citri was inserted into the EcoRI site of pCM-K3 and the resulting plasmid pCM-K3-spi (Figure 2A) was successfully introduced into M. yeatsii GIH TS and Mcc California Kid. Expression of spiralin by the transformants was demonstrated by immunoblotting (Additional file 6: Figure S3 for Mcc transformants, data not shown for M. yeatsii transformants). These results confirm and extend recently published results [25] indicating that pMyBK1 derivatives can be used as expression vectors in mycoplasma species of veterinary importance.
General phylogeny of Rep sequences from mycoplasma plasmids
Based on the availability of 25 Rep sequences of mycoplasma plasmids (Additional file 3: Table S3), it was possible to address how these sequences cluster in the phylogenetic tree constructed with a set of sequences including representatives of RCR plasmids from both Mollicutes and Firmicutes (Figure 6). A set of 62 amino acids sequence corresponding to the replication protein of 25 mycoplasma plasmids and of 37 representatives of the major RCR plasmid families, including those of the phytoplasma plasmids was selected for constructing the phylogenetic tree. Phylogenetic analyses confirmed that, except for pMyBK1, all mycoplasma plasmids could be grouped within the pMV158 family (Figure 6). This result is consistent with the prediction, in these Rep sequences, of a Rep2 domain typical of this plasmid family. Yet, mycoplasma plasmids do not form a single, coherent group in this family but instead cluster into two distinct branches designated as groups 1 and 2. Rep proteins from groups 1 and 2 share only limited similarities and, the most divergent members in these groups are more distant between each other than they are from the streptococcal pMV158. Group 1 consists of highly similar proteins (identity ranging from 88 to 100%) and includes Rep proteins from Mmc and Mcc plasmids. Conversely, group 2 is more heterogeneous and includes Rep proteins from M. leachii, M. yeatsii, M. cottewii, Mmc and Mcc plasmids. Further phylogenetic analyses showed that group 2 could be split into two statistically-supported subgroups (2A and 2B).
It is noteworthy that a large group of phytoplasma plasmids also clusters within the pMV158 family. Nevertheless, the Rep proteins of phytoplasma plasmids are more closely related to Rep of mobile elements from non-mollicute bacteria than to those of mycoplasma plasmids. In addition, the Rep of phytoplasma plasmids are characterized by a C-terminal part having a helicase domain, which is absent in the Rep of mycoplasma plasmids.
Conclusions
This study was performed in the context of (i) conflicting reports regarding the prevalence of plasmids in mycoplasma species [3,24] and of (ii) the quest for MGE that may have served as genetic vehicles resulting in the high level of HGT reported among ruminant mycoplasmas [58]. We found a rather high prevalence of plasmids in species belonging to the M. mycoides cluster and, in contrast, a lack of plasmids in the M. bovis-M. agalactiae group. Therefore, these plasmids are unlikely to contribute by themselves to a significant part of the reported HGT, and therefore the role of other MGE, including ICEs, remains to be evaluated.
The present study has considerably increased our knowledge about the genetic organization of mycoplasma plasmids adding 21 new sequences to a repertoire of only 5 in the databases. With the exception of the previously reported pMyBK1 replicon, all the mycoplasma plasmids belong to the pMV158 family. As these plasmids only encode two genes, one essential for replication initiation and the other for control of copy number, they do not carry any accessory gene that may confer a new phenotype to the recipient cell.
The alignment of rep plasmid sequences resulted in a tree that does not fit the 16S rDNA phylogeny of the host species. For instance, the Rep proteins of Mcc pMG1B-1 and pMG2A-1 fall into two distinct groups whereas those of Mcc pMG2A-1 and M. yeatsii pMG2B-1 are almost identical (Figure 6, Table S3). Incongruence between plasmid and chromosomal gene phylogenies has often been reported in bacteria and interpreted as the result of lateral plasmid transfer between diverse species [59,60]. In addition, plasmid phylogeny has probably been blurred by recombination events that resulted in a mosaic structure (Figure 4). The occurrence of several mycoplasma species within the same host (i.e. small ruminants) might have facilitated horizontal plasmid transfer within this bacterial genus. The driving force for this extrachromosomal inheritance has yet to be further studied taking into account the apparent lack of beneficial traits by the recipient species. Mechanisms underlying the transfer of plasmids between strains of ruminant mycoplasmas have yet to be deciphered since, the mycoplasma pMV158-like plasmids, like a majority of plasmids should be considered as non mobilizable/non self-transmissible according to the classification of Smilie et al. [61]. Their small size favors transfer mechanisms like transduction, natural transformation and co-integration in mobile elements.
The topology of the rep phylogenetic tree (Figure 6) is not consistent with the idea of a common plasmid ancestor that would have been vertically inherited in both phytoplasma and mycoplasma clades. Moreover, the clear-cut clustering of mycoplasma plasmids into separate branches supports the hypothesis of several, rather than a single, mycoplasma plasmid ancestors. Using the clustering of rep sequences, we propose a new nomenclature system that applies to all currently described mycoplasma and phytoplasma plasmids. This classification does not take into account the plasmid host as these elements are transmissible from one species to another. As the spiroplasma plasmids do not carry a rep sequence showing a significant homology with those described here (Figure 6), they cannot be included in this nomenclature.
While this paper was under review, Kent et al. published a study showing the use of pMyBK1 as a shuttle vector for heterologous gene expression in M. yeatsii[25]. We confirm that pMyBK1 represents a novel RCR plasmid family and that its derivatives can be used as gene vectors to express cloned genes not only in M. yeatsii[25] but also in three other ruminant mycoplasmas. This result is not trivial in a group of organisms for which the genetic toolbox is very limited. The pMyBK1 plasmid has a small size, lacks any CDS homologous to genes for mating pair formation but encodes a relaxase belonging to the MobV class. These features argue for a mobilizable rather than conjugative nature of the plasmid [25,62]. The fact that pMyBK1 was only detected in M. yeatsii is inconsistent with the finding that it replicates in mycoplasma species other than M. yeatsii, at least when introduced experimentally. Two hypotheses would explain this apparent contradiction. One is that the transfer of pMyBK1 is a rare event and hence, the number of strains screened was not large enough to detect additional pMyBK1-related plasmids. The other is that pMyBK1 would not be transferred in vivo or would not be stably maintained once transferred.
Abbreviations
(HGT): Horizontal gene transfer; (MGE): Mobile genetic elements; (ICEs): Integrative and conjugative elements; (Mmc): M. mycoides subsp. capri; (Mcc): M. capricolum subsp. capricolum; (CDS): Coding Sequence; (dso): Leading strand origin of replication; (sso): Lagging-strand initiation site; (RCR): Rolling-circle replication; (PEG): Polyethylene glycol.
Competing interests
All the authors declare no competing interests.
Authors’ contributions
MB, FT, VM and ED-F carried out most of the experiments. MB, FT, CC, ED-F and AB participated in the design of the study. MB and FT drafted the manuscript, all authors made suggestions for improvement. All authors participated in the data analysis. FT, CC and AB coordinated the study. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Supplementary Material
Contributor Information
Marc Breton, Email: marc.breton@bordeaux.inra.fr.
Florence Tardy, Email: florence.tardy@anses.fr.
Emilie Dordet-Frisoni, Email: e.dordet-frisoni@envt.fr.
Eveline Sagne, Email: e.sagne@envt.fr.
Virginie Mick, Email: virginie.mick@anses.fr.
Joël Renaudin, Email: renaudin@bordeaux.inra.fr.
Pascal Sirand-Pugnet, Email: sirand@bordeaux.inra.fr.
Christine Citti, Email: c.citti@envt.fr.
Alain Blanchard, Email: ablancha@bordeaux.inra.fr.
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by grant ANR09MIE016 (MycXgene) from the French national funding research agency (ANR) to CC (PI), by INRA, Région Aquitaine and ENVT. We would like to thank Guillaume Bouyssou, Agnès Tricot and Céline Michard for technical help. We would also like to thank Laure Maigre who made the first observation of the extrachromosomal elements in Mcc and M. yeatsii strains, and Eilean Bertram for revising the manuscript.
References
- Smets BF, Barkay T. Horizontal gene transfer: perspectives at a crossroads of scientific disciplines. Nature Reviews. 2005;3(9):675–678. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro1253. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Frost LS, Leplae R, Summers AO, Toussaint A. Mobile genetic elements: the agents of open source evolution. Nature reviews. 2005;3(9):722–732. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro1235. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Razin S, Yogev D, Naot Y. Molecular biology and pathogenicity of mycoplasmas. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 1998;62(4):1094–1156. doi: 10.1128/mmbr.62.4.1094-1156.1998. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sirand-Pugnet P, Citti C, Barre A, Blanchard A. Evolution of mollicutes: down a bumpy road with twists and turns. Res Microbiol. 2007;158(10):754–766. doi: 10.1016/j.resmic.2007.09.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Weisburg WG, Tully JG, Rose DL, Petzel JP, Oyaizu H, Young D, Mandelco L, Sechest J, Lawrence TG, Van Etten J. et al. A phylogenetic analysis of mycoplasmas: basis for their classification. J Bacteriol. 1989;171:6455–6467. doi: 10.1128/jb.171.12.6455-6467.1989. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Glass JI, Assad-Garcia N, Alperovich N, Yooseph S, Lewis MR, Maruf M, Hutchison CA 3rd, Smith HO, Venter JC. Essential genes of a minimal bacterium. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006;103(2):425–430. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0510013103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Vasconcelos AT, Ferreira HB, Bizarro CV, Bonatto SL, Carvalho MO, Pinto PM, Almeida DF, Almeida LG, Almeida R, Alves-Filho L. et al. Swine and poultry pathogens: the complete genome sequences of two strains of Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae and a strain of Mycoplasma synoviae. J Bacteriol. 2005;187(16):5568–5577. doi: 10.1128/JB.187.16.5568-5577.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pereyre S, Sirand-Pugnet P, Beven L, Charron A, Renaudin H, Barre A, Avenaud P, Jacob D, Couloux A, Barbe V. et al. Life on arginine for Mycoplasma hominis: clues from its minimal genome and comparison with other human urogenital mycoplasmas. PLoS Genetics. 2009;5(10):e1000677. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1000677. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tamura K, Nei M. Estimation of the number of nucleotide substitutions in the control region of mitochondrial DNA in humans and chimpanzees. Mol Biol Evol. 1993;10(3):512–526. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a040023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tamura K, Peterson D, Peterson N, Stecher G, Nei M, Kumar S. MEGA5: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis using maximum likelihood, evolutionary distance, and maximum parsimony methods. Mol Biol Evol. 2011;28(10):2731–2739. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msr121. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mouches C, Bove JM. A plasmid from S. citri strain M14 hybridizes with extrachromosomal DNAs from other spiroplasmas, including corn stunt spiroplasma E275, tick spiroplasma 277F, and coco spiroplasma N525. Yale J Biol Med. 1983;56(5–6):723–727. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ranhand JM, Mitchell WO, Popkin TJ, Cole RM. Covalently closed circular deoxyribonucleic acids in spiroplasmas. J Bacteriol. 1980;143(3):1194–1199. doi: 10.1128/jb.143.3.1194-1199.1980. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gasparich GE, Hackett KJ, Clark EA, Renaudin J, Whitcomb RF. Occurrence of extrachromosomal deoxyribonucleic acids in spiroplasmas associated with plants, insects, and ticks. Plasmid. 1993;29(2):81–93. doi: 10.1006/plas.1993.1011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Berho N, Duret S, Danet JL, Renaudin J. Plasmid pSci6 from Spiroplasma citri GII-3 confers insect transmissibility to the non-transmissible strain S. citri 44. Microbiology (Reading, England) 2006;152(Pt 9):2703–2716. doi: 10.1099/mic.0.29085-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Breton M, Duret S, Danet JL, Dubrana MP, Renaudin J. Sequences essential for transmission of Spiroplasma citri by its leafhopper vector, Circulifer haematoceps, revealed by plasmid curing and replacement based on incompatibility. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2010;76(10):3198–3205. doi: 10.1128/AEM.00181-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Firrao G, Garcia-Chapa M, Marzachi C. Phytoplasmas: genetics, diagnosis and relationships with the plant and insect host. Front Biosci. 2007;12:1353–1375. doi: 10.2741/2153. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Khan SA. Plasmid rolling-circle replication: recent developments. Mol Microbiol. 2000;37(3):477–484. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2958.2000.02001.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Khan SA. Plasmid rolling-circle replication: highlights of two decades of research. Plasmid. 2005;53(2):126–136. doi: 10.1016/j.plasmid.2004.12.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Brown DR, May M, Bradbury JM, Balish MF, Calcutt MJ, Glass JI, Tasker S, Messick JB, Johansson KE, Neimark H. In: Bergey's Manual of Systematic Bacteriology. Second Edition. Krieg NR, Staley JT, Brown DR, Hedlund BP, Paster BJ, Ward NL, Ludwig W, Whitman WB, editor. New York, N.Y.: Springer; 2011. Genus I. Mycoplasma Nowak 1929, 1349 nom. cons. Jud. Comm. Opin. 22, 1958, 166AL; pp. 575–613. [Google Scholar]
- Bergemann AD, Whitley JC, Finch LR. Homology of mycoplasma plasmid pADB201 and staphylococcal plasmid pE194. J Bacteriol. 1989;171(1):593–595. doi: 10.1128/jb.171.1.593-595.1989. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Djordjevic SP, Forbes WA, Forbes-Faulkner J, Kuhnert P, Hum S, Hornitzky MA, Vilei EM, Frey J. Genetic diversity among Mycoplasma species bovine group 7: Clonal isolates from an outbreak of mastitis, and abortion in dairy cattle. Electrophoresis. 2001;22(16):3551–3561. doi: 10.1002/1522-2683(200109)22:16<3551::AID-ELPS3551>3.0.CO;2-#. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- King KW, Dybvig K. Nucleotide sequence of Mycoplasma mycoides subspecies mycoides plasmid pKMK1. Plasmid. 1992;28(1):86–91. doi: 10.1016/0147-619X(92)90039-D. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Thiaucourt F, Manso-Silvan L, Salah W, Barbe V, Vacherie B, Jacob D, Breton M, Dupuy V, Lomenech AM, Blanchard A. et al. Mycoplasma mycoides, from "mycoides Small Colony" to "capri". A microevolutionary perspective. BMC Genomics. 2011;12:114. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-12-114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Nascimento ER, DaMassa AJ, Yamamoto R, Nascimento MGF. Plasmids in Mycoplasma species isolated from goats and sheep and their preliminary typing. Rev Microbiol. 1999;30(1):32–36. doi: 10.1590/S0001-37141999000100006. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Kent BN, Foecking MF, Calcutt MJ. Development of a novel plasmid as a shuttle vector for heterologous gene expression in Mycoplasma yeatsii. J Microbiol Methods. 2012;91(1):121–127. doi: 10.1016/j.mimet.2012.07.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chazel M, Tardy F, Le Grand D, Calavas D, Poumarat F. Mycoplasmoses of ruminants in France: recent data from the national surveillance network. BMC Vet Res. 2010;6(1):32. doi: 10.1186/1746-6148-6-32. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tully JG. In: Molecular and diagnostic procedures in mycoplasmology. Razin S, J.G T, editor. San Diego: Academic press, Inc; 1995. Molecular and diagnostic procedures in mycoplasmology; pp. 33–39. [Google Scholar]
- Freundt EA. In: Methods in Mycoplasmology. Razin S, Tully JG, editor. New York: Academic Press; 1983. Culture media for classic mycoplasmas; pp. 127–135. [Google Scholar]
- Pushnova EA, Geier M, Y.S Z. An easy and accurate agarose gel assay for quantitation of bacterial plasmid copy numbers. Anal Biochem. 2000;284:70–76. doi: 10.1006/abio.2000.4668. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Abramoff MD, Magalhaes PJ, Ram SJ. Image processing with ImageJ. Biophotonics International. 2004;11(7):36–42. [Google Scholar]
- Lee C, Kim J, Shin SG, Hwang S. Absolute and relative QPCR quantification of plasmid copy number in Escherichia coli. J Biotechnol. 2006;123(3):273–280. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiotec.2005.11.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bocs S, Cruveiller S, Vallenet D, Nuel G, Medigue C. AMIGene: Annotation of MIcrobial Genes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2003;31(13):3723–3726. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkg590. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Marchler-Bauer A, Lu S, Anderson JB, Chitsaz F, Derbyshire MK, DeWeese-Scott C, Fong JH, Geer LY, Geer RC, Gonzales NR. et al. CDD: a Conserved Domain Database for the functional annotation of proteins. Nucleic Acids Res. 2011;39(Database issue):D225–D229. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkq1189. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Geourjon C, Deleage G. SOPM: a self-optimized method for protein secondary structure prediction. Protein Eng. 1994;7(2):157–164. doi: 10.1093/protein/7.2.157. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Betley JN, Frith MC, Graber JH, Choo S, Deshler JO. A ubiquitous and conserved signal for RNA localization in chordates. Curr Biol. 2002;12(20):1756–1761. doi: 10.1016/S0960-9822(02)01220-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zuker M. Mfold web server for nucleic acid folding and hybridization prediction. Nucleic Acids Res. 2003;31(13):3406–3415. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkg595. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Notredame C. Computing multiple sequence/structure alignments with the T-coffee package. Curr Protoc Bioinformatics. 2010;3(3 8):1–25. doi: 10.1002/0471250953.bi0308s29. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Larkin MA, Blackshields G, Brown NP, Chenna R, McGettigan PA, McWilliam H, Valentin F, Wallace IM, Wilm A, Lopez R. et al. Clustal W and Clustal X version 2.0. Bioinformatics. 2007;23(21):2947–2948. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btm404. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Carver T, Berriman M, Tivey A, Patel C, Bohme U, Barrell BG, Parkhill J, Rajandream MA. Artemis and ACT: viewing, annotating and comparing sequences stored in a relational database. Bioinformatics. 2008;24(23):2672–2676. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btn529. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- te Riele H, Michel B, Ehrlich SD. Are single-stranded circles intermediates in plasmid DNA replication? EMBO J. 1986;5(3):631–637. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1986.tb04257.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Duret S, Berho N, Danet JL, Garnier M, Renaudin J. Spiralin is not essential for helicity, motility, or pathogenicity but is required for efficient transmission of Spiroplasma citri by its leafhopper vector Circulifer haematoceps. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2003;69(10):6225–6234. doi: 10.1128/AEM.69.10.6225-6234.2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lartigue C, Duret S, Garnier M, Renaudin J. New plasmid vectors for specific gene targeting in Spiroplasma citri. Plasmid. 2002;48(2):149–159. doi: 10.1016/S0147-619X(02)00121-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Stamburski C, Renaudin J, Bove JM. First step toward a virus-derived vector for gene cloning and expression in spiroplasmas, organisms which read UGA as a tryptophan codon: synthesis of chloramphenicol acetyltransferase in Spiroplasma citri. J Bacteriol. 1991;173(7):2225–2230. doi: 10.1128/jb.173.7.2225-2230.1991. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- King KW, Dybvig K. Plasmid transformation of Mycoplasma mycoides subspecies mycoides is promoted by high concentrations of polyethylene glycol. Plasmid. 1991;26(2):108–115. doi: 10.1016/0147-619X(91)90050-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Burdett V. Identification of tetracycline-resistant R-plasmids in Streptococcus agalactiae (group B) Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1980;18(5):753–760. doi: 10.1128/AAC.18.5.753. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- del Solar G, Kramer G, Ballester S, Espinosa M. Replication of the promiscuous plasmid pLS1: a region encompassing the minus origin of replication is associated with stable plasmid inheritance. Mol Gen Genet. 1993;241(1–2):97–105. doi: 10.1007/BF00280206. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- del Solar G, Acebo P, Espinosa M. Replication control of plasmid pLS1: efficient regulation of plasmid copy number is exerted by the combined action of two plasmid components, CopG and RNA II. Mol Microbiol. 1995;18(5):913–924. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.1995.18050913.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Moscoso M, del Solar G, Espinosa M. In vitro recognition of the replication origin of pLS1 and of plasmids of the pLS1 family by the RepB initiator protein. J Bacteriol. 1995;177(24):7041–7049. doi: 10.1128/jb.177.24.7041-7049.1995. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Priebe SD, Lacks SA. Region of the streptococcal plasmid pMV158 required for conjugative mobilization. J Bacteriol. 1989;171(9):4778–4784. doi: 10.1128/jb.171.9.4778-4784.1989. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Francia MV, Varsaki A, Garcillan-Barcia MP, Latorre A, Drainas C, de la Cruz F. A classification scheme for mobilization regions of bacterial plasmids. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2004;28(1):79–100. doi: 10.1016/j.femsre.2003.09.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Garcillan-Barcia MP, Francia MV, de la Cruz F. The diversity of conjugative relaxases and its application in plasmid classification. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2009;33(3):657–687. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6976.2009.00168.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- del Solar G, Giraldo R, Ruiz-Echevarria MJ, Espinosa M, Diaz-Orejas R. Replication and control of circular bacterial plasmids. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 1998;62(2):434–464. doi: 10.1128/mmbr.62.2.434-464.1998. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- DaMassa AJD, Tully JG, Rose DL, Pitcher D, Leach RH, Cottew GS. Mycoplasma auris sp. nov., Mycoplasma cottewii sp. nov., and Mycoplasma yeatsii sp. nov., new sterol-requiring mollicutes from the external ear canals of goats. Int J Syst Bacteriol. 1994;44(3):479–484. doi: 10.1099/00207713-44-3-479. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jimena ON, Laura JM, Elena MM, Alonso NH, Teresa QM. Association of Raillietia caprae with the presence of Mycoplasmas in the external ear canal of goats. Prev Vet Med. 2009;92(1–2):150–153. doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2009.08.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lartigue C, Blanchard A, Renaudin J, Thiaucourt F, Sirand-Pugnet P. Host specificity of mollicutes oriC plasmids: functional analysis of replication origin. Nucleic Acids Res. 2003;31(22):6610–6618. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkg848. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Saitou N, Nei M. The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol Biol Evol. 1987;4(4):406–425. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a040454. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Felsenstein J. Phylogenies from molecular sequences: inference and reliability. Annu Rev Genet. 1988;22:521–565. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ge.22.120188.002513. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sirand-Pugnet P, Lartigue C, Marenda M, Jacob D, Barré A, Barbe V, Schenowitz C, Mangenot S, Couloux A, Segurens B. et al. Being pathogenic, plastic, and sexual while living with a nearly minimal bacterial genome. PLoS Genet. 2007;3(5):e75. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.0030075. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Davies J, Smith DI. Plasmid-determined resistance to antimicrobial agents. Annu Rev Microbiol. 1978;32:469–518. doi: 10.1146/annurev.mi.32.100178.002345. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Valdes AM, Pinero D. Phylogenetic estimation of plasmid exchange in bacteria. Evolution. 1992;46(3):641–656. doi: 10.2307/2409634. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Smillie C, Garcillan-Barcia MP, Francia MV, Rocha EP, de la Cruz F. Mobility of plasmids. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2010;74(3):434–452. doi: 10.1128/MMBR.00020-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- de Antonio C, Farias ME, de Lacoba MG, Espinosa M. Features of the plasmid pMV158-encoded MobM, a protein involved in its mobilization. J Mol Biol. 2004;335(3):733–743. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2003.11.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.