Skip to main content
Cell Research logoLink to Cell Research
. 2012 Dec 25;23(1):18–19. doi: 10.1038/cr.2012.181

A load of small RNAs in the sperm — how many bits of hereditary information?

Jafar Kiani 1,2,3, Minoo Rassoulzadegan 1,2,3,*
PMCID: PMC3541666  PMID: 23266892

Germ cells prepare the transmission of information to the next generation. The logic of Mendelian heredity accounts for a large fraction of it, but over the past few years several independent investigations lead us to also consider other forms of heredity. One of the possibilities is a non-Mendelian form of transmission of epigenetic information–regulatory mechanisms that expression of genes is either silenced or activated in a manner stable enough to be maintained throughout cellular divisions ('epigenetic memory') and even transferred to the following generations ('epigenetic heredity'). What drives such alternative epigenetic phenomena, what targets genetic loci in a sequence-specific manner, and for paternal heredity, what regulatory components are comprised in the minimal cellular structure of sperm? Various candidates are considered, such as modulations of DNA methylation and covalent modifications of nucleosomal histones in chromatin. However, RNA molecules are now also considered as key vectors of epigenetic variations with recent development of experimental assays in organisms ranging from the worm to the fly and the mouse. RNAs would obviously be the best candidates to act by sequence recognition as guides of complexes that would include protein and other components of silencing/activating systems. Hence, the development of research programs to investigate RNA molecules in the most detailed manner, i.e., by deep sequencing the RNA content of the germ cell, with a specific interest in sperm, a transcriptionally silent cell with a limited amount of RNA to sequence, could hold the keys to biological effects.

Mature mammalian sperm is produced after complex steps of differentiation of the cytoplasm (formation of the chromatoid body) and the nucleus (compacted chromatin structure). Only 10-20 fg of RNA are maintained in a mature sperm cell, with a profile distinct from somatic cells because of the absence of the major components of the ribosome. Although part of the sperm RNA is made of fragments of coding transcripts, several exploratory analyses identified a variety of non-coding RNAs (ncRNAs). Krawetz and his colleagues1 reported that spermatozoa contain an abundant population of ncRNA – about 24 000 estimated in an individual sperm. This small RNA fraction includes multiple known classes of ncRNAs: repeat-associated small RNAs, miRNAs, siRNAs, and piRNAs. Approximately 20% of the miRNAs are introduced into the oocyte during fertilization2. It was shown that miR34c is a sperm-borne microRNA3. Two examples of siRNAs were found in sperm, IGF2 receptor antisense and antisense sequence for the Dickkopf-2 gene4. piRNAs, initially discovered in differentiating germ cells, are also found in sperm. Recently, Kawano et al.5 reported another class of small RNAs in low copy number derived from a piRNA locus. By high-throughput sequencing of small-RNAs (< 40 bp) in the sperm, Peng and colleagues6 now show a marked enrichment of tRNA fragments of 30-34 nt in length in the sperm, which make up to 67% of total sperm small RNA reads. They pointed out that these RNAs are matched to the 5′ halves of tRNAs, hence they are designated as mature sperm-enriched tRNA-derived small RNAs or mse-tsRNA, which are generated from mature tRNAs through cleavage at specific site within the anti-codon loops of a majority of glu- and gly-tRNAs. Intriguingly, these mse-tsRNAs are highly enriched in mature sperm head and oocytes, but their numbers drop dramatically after fertilization.

The search is now open to define possible functions of these mse-tsRNAs in fertilization, in zygotes or in embryonic development, which may eventually undergo variations constitutive of a mode of inheritance. tRNAs are abundant and functionally important noncoding RNAs with highly conserved and extensive posttranscriptional processing. Maturation of tRNA generates several byproduct species, including tRNA fragments derived from tRNA 3′-trailer processed by tRNase Z or tRNA 5′-leader by RNase P. A parallel has been drawn with a different set of RNAi machinery enzymes7. A functional difference independent of protein synthesis is suggested with a novel role in modulation of gene expression. Upon environmental changes like stress conditions, starvation, heat shock or oxidative stress, such tRNA fragments dramatically increase in frequency. It was shown that these cleaved 5′ half-tRNAs can suppress protein synthesis independent of eIF2α in the transfected cell8. In the same study, suppression of protein synthesis was associated with displacement of eIF4G/A from mRNAs by tRNA fragments. Moreover, these fragments can induce formation of stress granules and cytoplasmic foci with untranslated mRNPs9. Elbarbary and coworkers10 have studied gene expression modulated by human 5′-half-tRNA coupled with tRNase ZL or tRNase Zl activity. 5′-half-tRNA acts as a small guide RNA (sgRNA) for tRNase ZL, and efficiently leads to the suppression of gene expression of a specific mRNA containing complementary binding sequence of sgRNA. They suggest that tRNase ZL guided by tRNA halves can play a role in p53 signaling pathway and apoptosis.

The discovery of an enrichment of 5′-half tRNA fragments in sperm now raises the question of the biological meaning of what we read. What is the function of these small RNAs if any? The next step, more challenging, is to find a biological test to support the sequencing data. One more and more obvious possibility is that epigenetic modifications are induced by such RNA molecules, which, is now being tested experimentally in multiple organisms, from worms and Drosophila to mammals11,12,13,14,15. The findings of Peng and colleagues add hope to a growing field to understand how the maintenance of such large amounts of fragmented tRNAs in sperm functionally contributes to the non-Mendelian transmission of heritable traits.

References

  1. Krawetz SA, Kruger A, Lalancette C, et al. A survey of small RNAs in human sperm. Hum Reprod. 2011;26:3401–3412. doi: 10.1093/humrep/der329. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Amanai M, Brahmajosyula M, Perry AC. A restricted role for sperm-borne microRNAs in mammalian fertilization. Biol Reprod. 2006;75:877–884. doi: 10.1095/biolreprod.106.056499. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Liu WM, Pang RT, Chiu PC, et al. Sperm-borne microRNA-34c is required for the first cleavage division in mouse. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2012;109:490–494. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1110368109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Krawetz SA. Paternal contribution: new insights and future challenges. Nat Rev Genet. 2005;6:633–642. doi: 10.1038/nrg1654. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Kawano M, Kawaji H, Grandjean V, Kiani J, Rassoulzadegan M. Novel small noncoding RNAs in mouse spermatozoa, zygotes and early embryos. PLoS One. 2012;7:e44542. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0044542. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Peng H, Shi J, Zhang Y, et al. A novel class of tRNA-derived small RNAs extremely enriched in mature mouse sperm. Cell Res. 2012;22:1609–1612. doi: 10.1038/cr.2012.141. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Sobala A, Hutvagner G.Transfer RNA-derived fragments: origins, processing, and functionsWiley InterdiscipRev RNA 20112853–862. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Ivanov P, Emara MM, Villen J, Gygi SP, Anderson P. Angiogenin-induced tRNA fragments inhibit translation initiation. Mol Cell. 2011;43:613–623. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2011.06.022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Emara MM, Ivanov P, Hickman T, et al. Angiogenin-induced tRNA-derived stress-induced RNAs promote stress-induced stress granule assembly. J Biol Chem. 2010;285:10959–10968. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M109.077560. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Elbarbary RA, Takaku H, Uchiumi N, et al. Modulation of gene expression by human cytosolic tRNase ZL through 5′-half-tRNA. PLoS One. 2009;4:e5908. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0005908. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Wagner KD, Wagner N, Ghanbarian H, et al. RNA induction and inheritance of epigenetic cardiac hypertrophy in the mouse. Dev Cell. 2008;14:962–969. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2008.03.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Rassoulzadegan M, Grandjean V, Gounon P, et al. RNA-mediated non-mendelian inheritance of an epigenetic change in the mouse. Nature. 2006;441:469–474. doi: 10.1038/nature04674. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. de Vanssay A, Bouge AL, Boivin A, et al. Paramutation in Drosophila linked to emergence of a piRNA-producing locus. Nature. 2012;490:112–115. doi: 10.1038/nature11416. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Chandler VL.Paramutation: RNA-mediated instructions passed across generations Cell 200723641–645.17320501 [Google Scholar]
  15. Ashe A, Sapetschnig A, Weick EM, et al. piRNAs can trigger a multigenerational epigenetic memory in the germline of C. elegans. Cell. 2012;150:88–99. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2012.06.018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Cell Research are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES