Abstract
The plant peptide hormone ENOD40B was produced in a protein production strain of Escherichia coli harboring an induction controller plasmid (Rosetta(DE3)pLysS) as a His6-tagged ubiquitin fusion protein. The fusion protein product was denatured and refolded as part of the isolation procedure and purified by immobilized metal ion chromatography. The peptide hormone was released from its fusion partner by adding yeast ubiquitin hydrolase (YUH) and subsequently purified by reversed phase chromatography. The purity of the resulting peptide fragment was assayed by MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry and NMR spectroscopy. The final yields of the target peptide were 7.0 mg per liter of LB medium and 3.4 mg per liter of minimal medium.
Keywords: peptide hormone, nodule development, ubiquitin fusion, MS, NMR
INTRODUCTION
The symbiosis between most legume plants and nitrogen-fixing bacteria (rhizobia) results in the formation of root nodules. Oligosaccharides produced by rhizobia, called Nod factors, are known to induce the development of nodules through the expression of several nodulin genes. These genes are classified according to the timing of their induction as early nodulin (ENOD) and late nodulin (LNOD) genes. ENOD40, one of the early nodulin genes, is rapidly induced in the root and nodule primordium [1–3]. When ENOD40 is knocked out, functional nodule development is arrested; on the other hand, if ENOD40 is overexpressed, nodulation is accelerated. These indicate that ENOD40 plays a role in nodule development. In vitro translation of soybean ENOD40 mRNA led to the discovery of two peptides: a 12-amino acid peptide (ENOD40A) and a 24-amino acid peptide (ENOD40B) [4]. Each peptide interacts with the 93-kDa subunit of sucrose synthase and activates its enzymatic activity [5]. The binding site for ENOD40A on sucrose synthase has been reported [6], but the binding site for ENOD40B is unknown. The conversion of sucrose and uridine diphosphate (UDP) into UDP-glucose and UDP-fructose catalyzed by sucrose synthase is an important step in plant sucrose metabolism [7]. Sucrose catabolism is a key step in nitrogen fixation and is a required for the nodule to develop normally [8].
It is important to understand how these peptides behave structurally, in both their free and bound states. Structural studies require a large quantity of the target, and for NMR spectroscopy, the peptide ideally should be labeled with stable isotopes. Here we present a protocol for producing recombinant ENOD40B as a ubiquitin fusion in E. coli Rosetta(DE3)pLysS cells and for isolating and purifying the cleaved peptide.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Construction of the ENOD40B Expression Plasmid
The gene coding for ENOD40B (MVLEE AWRER GVRGE GAHSS HSLT) was synthesized chemically (Integrated DNA Technology, Coralville, IA, USA). The sense strand was 5'- ggt ggt atg gtg ctg gaa gaa gcg tgg cgc gaa cgc ggc gtg cgc ggc gaa ggc gcg cat agc agc cat agc ctg acc tga c3', and the antisense, 5'- tcg agt cag gtc agg cta tgg ctg cta tgc gcg cct tcg ccg cgc acg ccg cgt tcg cgc cac gct tct tcc agc acc ata cca ccg c-3'. The two DNA strands were annealed, and inserted into the vector pET-28a/ubiS, a slightly modified version of pET-28a/ubi [9] which had been previously digested with SacII and XhoI. The pET-28a/ubiS vector was constructed according to Xu et al. [10]. The resulting plasmid was named pET-28a/ubiS/ENOD40B.
Expression and Purification of Ubiquitin-ENOD40B Fusion Protein from LB Medium
The pET-28a/ubiS/ENOD40B plasmid was transformed into the expression host, Rosetta(DE3)pLysS (Novagen, Madison, WI). A single colony was used to inoculate 100 mL of LB medium supplemented with 50 µg/mL kanamycin and 34 µg/mL chloramphenicol. This culture was grown overnight in a shaking incubator at 37 °C. The next morning, the fully grown culture was used to inoculate 1 L of fresh LB medium containing the same antibiotics. The culture was grown at 37 °C, and IPTG (Gold BioTechnology, St. Louis, MO, USA) was added to a final concentration of 0.5 mM when the optical density at 600 nm reached 1.0. The culture was harvested 3 h later, and the cells were resuspended in 30 mL 10 mM TrisHCl pH 8.0. The cells were lysed by freezing and thawing, and the DNA was fragmented by sonication. The soluble fraction was retained after centrifugation at 15,000 rpm for 20 min and loaded onto a Hi-Trap Chelating HP column (5 mL) charged with Ni2+ ions (GE Healthcare, Piscataway, NJ, USA). The column was washed first with 20 mL Buffer A (10 mM sodium phosphate buffer pH 7.4, 10 mM imidazole, 300 mM NaCl), then 10 ml of 20% ethanol. Protein bound to the column was denatured by applying 10 mL Buffer A containing 8 M urea. On-column refolding was performed by applying 10 mL aliquots in which the urea concentration was reduced stepwise to 6, 4, 2, 1, and 0 M. The bound fraction was eluted with 10 mL Buffer B (10 mM sodium phosphate buffer pH 7.4, 400 mM imidazole, 300 mM NaCl). Ultrafiltration was used both to concentrate the solution and to exchange the buffer to 10 mM TrisHCl containing 1 M urea. A Protein Assay Kit (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA) was used to determine the amount of protein in the pooled fractions.
Expression and Purification of Ubiquitin-ENOD40B Fusion Protein from Minimal Medium
E. coli Rosetta(DE3)pLysS containing the pET-28a/ubiS/ENOD40B was grown at 37 °C in a 5 mL LB medium inoculated from a single colony. 1 mL of the fully grown culture was used as an inoculum for 100 mL of the minimal medium and grown overnight at 37 °C. The fully grown culture was used in turn as an inoculum for 900 mL minimal medium, and the culture was grown at 37 °C. For uniform 15N-labeling, 1 g of 15NH4Cl per liter culture was provided as the sole nitrogen source. The fusion protein was isolated and purified as described above.
Purification of ENOD40B
To the purified ubiquitin-ENOD40B fusion protein, β-mercaptoethanol and yeast ubiquitin hydrolase (YUH) were added to final concentrations of 1 mM and 0.1 mg/mL, respectively. YUH was prepared according to Moon et al. [9]. The mixture was incubated at 37 °C overnight. The reaction mixture was loaded directly onto a Resource RPC column (GE Healthcare, Piscataway, NJ, USA), and a 20%–60% acetonitrile gradient was applied during chromatography on an HP1100 HPLC system (Agilent Technologies, Palo Alto, CA, USA). The ENOD40B fraction was pooled and lyophilized. The final product was analyzed by MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry directly after lyophilization.
NMR Spectroscopy
The NMR sample contained 1 mM [15N]-ENOD40B in 10 mM sodium acetate buffer pH 3.2 and 10% D2O. The 1H-15N heteronuclear single quantum coherence (HSQC) spectrum was collected at 25 °C on a Varian 800 MHz spectrometer. The raw data contained 2048 and 256 complex points in t2 and of t1, respectively. The NMRPipe software package[11] was used for data processing. The final spectrum contained 1024 and 256 real points in f2 and of f1, respectively.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Construction of Expression Plasmids
The gene coding for ubiquitin-ENOD40B was inserted into a (His)6- containing vector to facilitate purification of the fusion protein. The ubiquitin fusion system, which was similar to that described by Moon et al. [9], enabled extensive column washing with high concentration denaturant so that non-specifically binding proteins were washed away.
Expression and Purification of Ubiquitin-ENOD40B Fusion Protein
The expressed protein appeared as two bands, a minor band corresponding to ubiquitin and a major band corresponding to ubiquitin/ENOD40B fusion protein (Fig. 1, lane 8). The fusion protein apparently was cleaved by a protease present in the E. coli cells as described in the preparation of piscidin, an antimicrobial peptide [12]. The final protein yields (fusion protein plus ubiquitin alone) were 40 mg per liter of LB medium and 18 mg per liter of minimal medium. The ratio between the full fusion protein and ubiquitin molecule as measured by ImageJ software (NIH, USA) was 2:1. Thus, the amount of ubiquitin/ENOD40B fusion protein was around 67% of the total mass.
Figure 1.
Purification of ENOD40B produced from 1 L LB medium as monitored by 12% SDS-PAGE. Lane 1, size marker; lane 2, whole cell lysate; lanes 3 and 4, supernatant and pellet of cell lysate, respectively; lane 5, flowthrough fraction of supernatant from the HiTrap Chelating HP column; lane 6, fraction eluted by 20% ethanol; lane 7, fraction eluted by Buffer A containing 8M urea; lane 8, fraction eluted by Buffer B (fusion protein); lane 9, fusion protein after YUH cleavage.
Purification of ENOD40B Peptide
The ENOD40B peptide was efficiently clipped off of ubiquitin by YUH. Unlike other widely used proteases, such as thrombin and TEV protease, only a very small amount of YUH (50 µg) was required to cleave 10–20 mg of the ubiquitin fusion protein. Following cleavage, the entire reaction mixture was loaded onto a Resource RPC column in 1 mL aliquots on an HP1100 HPLC system. The volume of the cleavage reaction mixture was 10 mL, and reversed phase chromatography was repeated 10 times. The peptide eluted at ~28% acetonitrile. All ENOD40B-containing fractions were pooled and lyophilized (Fig. 2). The final yield of ENOD40B was around 7.0 or 3.4 mg per liter of LB or of minimal medium, respectively. MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry was used to assay the purified peptide (Fig. 3). MALDI-TOF showed a major peak at 2694.18 Da, which is in good agreement with the theoretical molecular weight of 2694.9 Da.
Figure 2.
HPLC elution profile from the Resource RPC column. The peak corresponding to ENOD40B is marked with an arrow. The acetonitrile gradient is also shown.
Figure 3.
MALDI-TOF spectrum of purified syndecan ENOD40B. Single and double charged molecular ions are seen at m/z = 2694 and 1348, respectively.
HSQC Spectrum of 15N-Labeled ENOD40B Peptide
The HSQC spectrum showed 24 strong signals with uniform linewidth and intensity (Fig. 4). From the peptide sequence, one predicts a maximum of 23 signals from backbone and 1 from the sidechain indole group. The position of the peak at (131.5 ppm 15N, 10.0 ppm 1H) is characteristic for the sidechain indole of Trp, and was assigned to Trp-7 of ENOD40B.
Figure 4.
[1H-15N] HSQC spectrum of ENOD40B. The NMR sample contained 1 mM [15N]-ENOD40B in 10 mM sodium acetate buffer pH 3.0 and 10% D2O. The spectrum was collected at 25 °C on a Varian Inova 800 MHz-NMR spectrometer.
CONCLUSIONS
The plant peptide hormone ENOD40B was produced recombinantly by a ubiquitin fusion system and purified successfully. Even though the fusion protein suffered partial proteolysis, sufficient peptide was recovered for further experiments. The major advantage of the ubiquitin fusion system over others stems from the small size of ubiquitin, which provides a higher relative amount of the target peptide and easier recovery and refolding from inclusion bodies. NMR and X-ray structural studies of this peptide are now in progress.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
This research was supported by Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Education, Science, and Technology (2010-0007161). This study made use of the National Magnetic Resonance Facility at Madison, which is supported by NIH grants P41RR02301 and P41RR02301-26 S1 (BRTP/ NCRR).
REFERENCES
- 1.Crespi MD, Jurkevitch E, Poiret M, d'Aubenton-Carafa Y, Petrovics G, Kondorosi E, Kondorosi A. enod40, a gene expressed during nodule organogenesis, codes for a nontranslatable RNA involved in plant growth. Embo J. 1994;13:5099–5112. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1994.tb06839.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Kouchi H, Hata S. Isolation and Characterization of Novel Nodulin cDNAs Representing Genes Expressed at Early Stages of Soybean Nodule Development. Mol Gen Genet. 1993;238:106–119. doi: 10.1007/BF00279537. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Kouchi H, Takane K, So RB, Ladha JK, Reddy PM. Rice ENOD40: isolation and expression analysis in rice and transgenic soybean root nodules. Plant J. 1999;18:121–129. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-313x.1999.00432.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Charon C, Sousa C, Crespi M, Kondorosi A. Alteration of enod40 expression modifies Medicago truncatula root nodule development induced by Sinorhizobium meliloti. Plant Cell. 1999;11:1953–1965. doi: 10.1105/tpc.11.10.1953. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Rohrig H, Schmidt J, Miklashevichs E, Schell J, John M. Soybean ENOD40 encodes two peptides that bind to sucrose synthase. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2002;99:1915–1920. doi: 10.1073/pnas.022664799. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Rohrig H, John M, Schmidt J. Modification of soybean sucrose synthase by S-thiolation with ENOD40 peptide A. Biochem Bioph Res Co. 2004;325:864–870. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2004.10.100. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Thummler F, Verma DPS. NODULIN-100 OF Soybeans Is The Subunit Of Sucrose Synthase Regulated By The Availability Of Free Heme In Nodules. J. Biol. Chem. 1987;262:14730–14736. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Gordon AJ, Minchin FR, James CL, Komina O. Sucrose synthase in legume nodules is essential for nitrogen fixation. Plant Physiol. 1999;120:867–877. doi: 10.1104/pp.120.3.867. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Moon WJ, Hwang DK, Park EJ, Kim YM, Chae YK. Recombinant expression, isotope labeling, refolding, and purification of an antimicrobial peptide, piscidin. Protein Expr Purif. 2007;51:141–146. doi: 10.1016/j.pep.2006.07.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Xu X, Jin F, Yu X, Ren S, Hu J, Zhang W. High-level expression of the recombinant hybrid peptide cecropinA(1-8)- magainin2(1-12) with an ubiquitin fusion partner in Escherichia coli. Protein Expr Purif. 2007;55:175–182. doi: 10.1016/j.pep.2007.04.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Delaglio F, Grzesiek S, Vuister GW, Zhu G, Pfeifer J, Bax A. NMRPipe: a multidimensional spectral processing system based on UNIX pipes. J Biomol NMR. 1995;6:277–293. doi: 10.1007/BF00197809. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Moon WJ, Hwang DK, Park EJ, Kim YM, Chae YK. Recombinant expression, isotope labeling, refolding, and purification of an antimicrobial peptide, piscidin. Protein Expr Purif. 2007;51:141–146. doi: 10.1016/j.pep.2006.07.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]




