Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Dec 1.
Published in final edited form as: Transl Stroke Res. 2012 Aug 14;3(4):418–427. doi: 10.1007/s12975-012-0202-9

G Protein-Coupled Receptor 124 (GPR124) Gene Polymorphisms and Risk of Brain Arteriovenous Malformation

Shantel Weinsheimer 1, Ari D Brettman 2, Ludmila Pawlikowska 1,3, D Christine Wu 4, Michael R Mancuso 4, Frank Kuhnert 4, Michael T Lawton 5, Stephen Sidney 6, Jonathan G Zaroff 6, Charles E McCulloch 7, William L Young 1,5,8, Calvin Kuo 4, Helen Kim 1,7
PMCID: PMC3544200  NIHMSID: NIHMS404215  PMID: 23329986

Abstract

Abnormal endothelial proliferation and angiogenesis may contribute to brain arteriovenous malformation (BAVM) formation. G protein-coupled receptor 124 (GPR124) mediates embryonic CNS angiogenesis; thus we investigated the association of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and haplotypes in GPR124 with risk of BAVM. Ten tagging SNPs spanning 39 kb of GPR124 were genotyped in 195 Caucasian BAVM patients and 243 Caucasian controls. SNP and haplotype association with risk of BAVM was screened using χ2 analysis. Associated variants were further evaluated using multivariable logistic regression, adjusting for age and sex. The minor alleles of 3 GPR124 SNPs adjacent to exon 2 and localized to a 16 kb region of high linkage disequilibrium were associated with reduced risk of BAVM (rs7015566 A, P=0.001; rs7823249 T, P=0.014; rs12676965 C, P=0.007). SNP rs7015566 (intron 1) remained associated after permutation testing (additive model P=0.033). Haplotype analysis revealed a significant overall association (χ2=12.55, 4 df, P=0.014); 2 haplotypes (ATCC, P=0.006 and GGCT, P=0.008) were associated with risk of BAVM. We genotyped a known synonymous SNP (rs16887051) in exon 2, however genotype frequency did not differ between cases and controls. Sequencing of conserved GPR124 regions revealed a novel indel polymorphism in intron 2. Immunohistochemistry confirmed GPR124 expression in the endothelium with no qualitative difference in expression between BAVM cases and controls. SNP rs7015566 mapping to intron 1 of GPR124 was associated with BAVM susceptibility among Caucasians. Future work is focused on investigating this gene region.

Keywords: Angiogenesis, Genetics, Intracerebral hemorrhage, Risk factor, Vascular malformation

Introduction

Brain arteriovenous malformations (BAVMs) are high-flow vascular lesions in which blood flows directly from the arterial to venous circulation with no intervening capillary bed. Patients with BAVM are susceptible to intracranial hemorrhage (ICH), and approximately half of all patients present with ICH [13]. The pathogenesis of BAVM is not yet defined, however both human and mouse studies support a role for dysregulated angiogenesis and inflammation [2, 410]. We recently identified polymorphisms in ANGPTL4, a pro- and anti-angiogenic mediator, that are associated with increased BAVM risk [11]. In addition, pro-inflammatory cytokines including interleukins IL-6 [12] IL-1β,[6] IL-1α,[13], IL-1RN [13], and transcription factors such as Notch 1 [14] and homeobox D3 (HOXD3) [15] can induce angiogenic activity that may contribute to BAVM. A highly positive correlation between angiopoietin-2 (ANG2) [16, 17] and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) levels in BAVM surgical specimens suggests that angiogenic factors may contribute to vascular instability resulting in BAVM hemorrhage [1820]. Genetic variants in EPHB4, a receptor important in arterio-venous differentiation and mediation of VEGF driven angiogenesis, were also associated with ICH susceptibility [5, 21].

The orphan G protein-coupled receptor GPR124/TEM5 has recently been described as a regulator of CNS-specific angiogenesis [22], which is upregulated in endothelial cells during tumor and physiologic angiogenesis [23, 24]. Complete or endothelial-specific inactivation of the GPR124 gene results in embryonic lethality by E15.5 due to CNS-specific angiogenesis arrest, while GPR124 overexpression leads to CNS-specific hyperproliferative vascular malformations that resemble venous angiomas [22]. Anderson et al subsequently reported that during development GPR124 is specifically expressed in the vasculature and is required for proper angiogenic sprouting into neural tissue [25]. Recent evidence also suggests GPR124 expression is required for CNS-specific vascularization and establishment of the blood-brain barrier [26]. These studies suggest a potential role for GPR124 in BAVM or ICH presentation. Thus, we hypothesized that polymorphisms in the GPR124 gene may be associated with increased risk of BAVM susceptibility or with ICH presentation in BAVM cases.

Materials and Methods

Study Population

Our study included 195 Caucasian BAVM cases and 243 healthy Caucasian controls. BAVM cases were recruited at the University of California, San Francisco (UCSF) or Kaiser Permanente Medical Care Plan of Northern California (KPNC) as part of our larger UCSF-KPNC Brain AVM registry. Details on case identification, enrollment, ascertainment, verification of diagnosis, and data collection have been previously described [2729] using standardized guidelines [30]. Controls were healthy volunteers with no significant medical history recruited from the same clinical catchment area for a pharmacogenetics study conducted at UCSF [31]. Informed consent was obtained on all study participants, and the study was approved by the Institutional Review Boards at UCSF and KPNC. The subset of patients who provided blood or saliva specimens, and self-reported as Caucasian, our largest ethnic subgroup, were eligible for this genetic study. The study population was restricted to Caucasians to reduce the potential for population stratification or confounding by race/ethnicity.

We also performed a secondary case-only analysis, comparing 81 ruptured with 114 unruptured BAVM cases at presentation. New intracranial blood on computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging was used to define ICH presentation, and coded as ‘ruptured’ irrespective of clinical presentation. Cases without evidence of new bleeding and presenting with seizure, focal ischemic deficit, headache, apparently unrelated symptoms or asymptomatic were coded as ‘unruptured’.

SNP Selection

Tagging SNPs in the GPR124 gene were selected from HapMap CEU population data (dbSNP build 126 on NCBI human genome build 36), using the Tagger algorithm [32] implemented in Haploview [33]. We used pairwise tagging to select a minimal set of tagSNPs with a minor allele frequency ≥5% such that all captured alleles are correlated at r2 ≥ 0.8 with a marker in that set. Ten SNPs capturing variation over a 39-kb region were selected for genotyping. Follow-up study included genotyping one synonymous SNP in exon 2 (rs16887051) in the same sample set.

Genotyping

Genomic DNA was extracted from peripheral blood lymphocytes using a salt modification method (Gentra Systems, Minneapolis, MN, USA). Polymorphism-spanning fragments were amplified by polymerase chain reaction and genotyped by Beckman Coulter SNPstream 48plex technology. However, three SNPs (rs7015566, rs7813990, and rs12676965) failed multiplex assay and were genotyped as single assays using template-directed primer extension with fluorescence polarization detection (Acycloprime II; Perkin Elmer, Boston, MA, USA) [34]. For each SNP, all cases and controls were genotyped using the same method with ≥95% genotyping call rate in the combined set, and did not differ significantly between cases and controls.

Statistical Analysis

Demographic and clinical characteristics of the BAVM cases and healthy controls were compared using t-tests for continuous variables (presented as mean ± standard deviation) and χ2 test for categorical variables.

Allelic Test of Association

Allele frequencies between BAVM cases and controls and between ruptured and unruptured cases were compared using χ2 tests of association in PLINK version 1.06 [35]. To account for multiple comparisons, we performed 1000 permutations of case-control status, comparing each observed test statistic against the maximum of all permuted statistics over all ten SNPs. The empirical P-value thus controls the study-wide error rate. Our estimates suggest that with our study sample size we had >80% power to detect an OR ≤ 0.65 or ≥ 1.49 per risk allele if we assumed an allele frequency of 31% or more in controls. For SNP association with BAVM rupture, we had >80% power to detect an odds ratio of ≤ 0.38 or ≥ 2.02 per risk allele if we assumed an allele frequency of 16% or more in unruptured BAVM patients.

Genotypic Test of Association

Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium (HWE) was evaluated among controls using the χ2 goodness-of-fit test implemented in Intercooled Stata software version 11 (StataCorp LP; College Station, TX) [36]. Genotypes were tested for association with BAVM using the χ2 test (2 df). Since the true genetic model is not known, we also tested the recommended additive model (0, 1, or 2 copies of the minor allele) with permutation testing as described above to estimate the odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI), adjusting for age and sex. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed using PLINK version 1.06 [37].

Haplotype Test of Association

Four-SNP fixed window haplotype frequencies were inferred from unphased genotype data using the expectation-maximization (EM) algorithm. Both a global likelihood ratio test of association comparing the overall haplotype distribution between cases and controls with degrees of freedom (df) equal to number of haplotypes tested −1, and haplotype-specific tests of association comparing each haplotype versus all other haplotypes (i.e., 1 df) were performed using PLINK version 1.06.[35] Only common haplotypes with a minor haplotype frequency (MHF) ≥ 1% were considered for analysis and significance was set at α<0.05.

Sequencing of GPR124 Exon 2 and Conserved Gene Regions

To identify new variants in associated regions, we sequenced GPR124 exon 2 and four highly conserved regions within the surrounding 16 kb linkage disequilibrium block in 24 BAVM cases. The human genome reference sequence (hg18) was used as the reference. Sequencing was successful in 20 cases. PCR and sequencing primers were designed using Primer3 [38]. Primer sequences and PCR reaction conditions are available upon request. PCR was cleaned up with 1× SAP PCR Clean-Up Reagent (Perkin-Elmer Life Sciences Inc., Waltham, MA, USA). Sequencing was performed in one direction using BigDye Terminator v3.1 (ABI; Foster City, CA, USA). Excess dye terminators were removed using genCLEAN (Genetix, New Milton, Hampshire, UK) plates following manufacturer’s instructions before automated capillary sequencing on an ABI3730 DNA Analyzer. Sequences were visualized in Sequencher (Gene Codes Corp., Ann Arbor, MI, USA).

Immunohistochemistry

Adult human tissues from normal brain, hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia (HHT), and pilocytic astrocytoma were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA) for one hour, cryoprotected in 30% sucrose and embedded in OCT. Frozen sections (10 μm) were stained for GPR124 and CD31 expression as previously described [22] using rabbit anti-GPR124 and hamster anti-CD31 (Millipore). Fluorescein conjugated isolectin B4 (Vectorlabs) was added to the secondary antibody mix to mark endothelial cells.

Using single-label immunohistochemistry, we evaluated GPR124 expression in unruptured BAVM vessels from 2 patients with sporadic BAVM and 3 control brain samples including one superficial temporal artery (STA) and two cerebral cortex samples obtained by temporal lobectomy for medically intractable seizure. Immunostaining details are located in the Electronic Supplementary Material.

Results

The demographic and morphological characteristics for the patients with BAVM and controls are summarized in Table 1. Controls were significantly younger than BAVM cases (P<0.001); there was no significant difference in sex. Among cases, 42% presented with hemorrhage, 36% had deep venous drainage, and mean BAVM size was 2.8 ± 1.4 cm.

Table 1.

Demographic and Clinical Characteristics of Study Cohort

Characteristics BAVM Cases Controls P*

No. % No. %
Total participants (n=438) 195 45 243 55
Age, years (mean ± SD) 38.0 ± 16.3 30.6 ± 5.8 <0.001
Female Sex 114 59 138 57 0.801
Hemorrhagic presentation 81 42 n/a n/a n/a
BAVM size, cm (mean ± SD) 2.8 ± 1.4 n/a n/a n/a n/a
Venous Drainage
 Superficial only 92 59 n/a n/a n/a
 Any deep 56 36 n/a n/a n/a
*

t-test for continuous variables and χ2 for categorical variables.

n/a = not applicable

Association of GPR124 SNPs with BAVM

We genotyped 10 tagging SNPs located in the GPR124 gene (Table 2) in 195 Caucasian BAVM cases and 243 healthy Caucasian controls. All SNPs were polymorphic (minor allele frequency >1%), and in Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium among the controls (P > 0.05). Minor allele frequencies were similar between study controls and HapMap CEU population. Genotype frequencies (Table 3) differed significantly between BAVM and controls for rs7015566 (P=0.007), rs7823249 (P=0.049), and rs12676965 (P=0.023).

Table 2.

GPR124 Polymorphisms Selected for Genotyping

Location dbSNP ID Base Change
Intron 1 rs915650a C>T
Intron 1 rs6993679a G>A
Intron 1 rs7015566b G>A
Exon 2 rs16887051a G>T
Intron 2 rs7823249a C>A
Intron 2 rs17433803a T>C
Intron 2 rs12676965b G>A
Intron 3 rs6468442a G>T
Intron 7 rs4976890a G>A
Intron 13 rs6982156a C>T
Intron 15 rs6998793a G>A
a

SNP genotyped using SNPstream 48plex technology

b

SNP genotyped using fluorescence-polarization detection using template-directed dye-terminator incorporation assay (FP-TDI)

Table 3.

Genotype and Allele Frequencies of GPR124 Polymorphisms in BAVM Cases and Controls

SNP Genotype Case, n (%) Controls, n (%) P*
rs915650
CC 75 (38.5) 86 (35.5) 0.351
CT 102 (52.3) 123 (50.8)
TT 18 (9.2) 33 (13.6)
C (64.6) (60.9) 0.266
T (35.4) (39.1)
rs6993679
AA 4 (2.1) 6 (2.5) 0.968
AG 49 (26.1) 62 (25.7)
GG 135 (71.8) 173 (71.8)
A (15.2) (15.4) 0.938
G (84.8) (84.6)
rs7015566
AA 12 (6.2) 28 (11.5) 0.007
AG 58 (29.9) 95 (39.1)
GG 124 (63.9) 120 (49.4)
A (21.1) (31.1) 0.001
G (78.9) (68.9)
rs16887051
AA 156 (90.7) 221 (92.5) 0.520
AG 16 (9.3) 18 (7.5)
GG 0 (0) 0 (0)
A (95.3) (96.2) 0.817
G (4.7) (3.8)
rs7823249
GG 116 (61.3) 121 (51.5) 0.049
GT 64 (33.9) 91 (38.7)
TT 9 (4.8) 23 (9.8)
G (78.3) (70.8) 0.014
T (21.7) (29.2)
rs17433803
AA 9 (4.7) 12 (4.9) 0.991
AC 60 (31.1) 75 (30.9)
CC 124 (64.3) 156 (64.2)
A (20.2) (20.4) 0.953
C (79.8) (79.6)
rs12676965
CC 4 (2.1) 17 (7.1) 0.023
CT 50 (26.5) 75 (31.1)
TT 135 (71.4) 149 (61.8)
C (15.3) (22.6) 0.007
T (84.7) (77.4)
rs6468442
AA 4 (2.1) 13 (5.4) 0.183
AG 68 (35.1) 88 (36.2)
GG 122 (62.9) 142 (58.4)
A (19.6) (23.5) 0.168
G (80.4) (76.5)
rs4976890
GG 99 (51.3) 113 (46.9) 0.552
GT 82 (42.5) 108 (44.8)
TT 12 (6.2) 20 (8.3)
G (72.5) (69.3) 0.297
T (27.5) (30.7)
rs6982156
AA 92 (47.2) 109 (44.9) 0.629
AG 88 (45.1) 109 (44.9)
GG 15 (7.7) 25 (10.2)
A (69.7) (67.3) 0.437
G (30.3) (32.7)
rs6998793
CC 73 (37.6) 93 (38.8) 0.892
CT 87 (44.9) 109 (45.4)
TT 34 (17.5) 38 (15.8)
C (60.0) (61.5) 0.673
T (40.0) (38.5)
*

P-values calculated from χ2 test (2 degrees of freedom); genotypic and allelic models.

Allelic and additive model association analysis identified 3 markers associated with reduced risk of BAVM after adjusting for age and sex (Table 4, additive model: rs7015566, P=0.003; rs7823249, P=0.012; rs12676965, P=0.024). SNP rs7015566 located in intron 1 remained associated after permutation testing (P=0.033).

Table 4.

Association of GPR124 Polymorphisms with BAVM

Additive Modela

Polymorphism OR 95% CI P Ppermb
rs915650_T 0.82 0.61 to 1.12 0.215 0.813
rs6993679_A 1.05 0.70 to 1.57 0.809 1.000
rs7015566_A 0.62 0.45 to 0.85 0.003 0.033
rs7823249_T 0.66 0.47 to 0.91 0.012 0.099
rs17433803_A 0.95 0.68 to 1.35 0.792 1.000
rs12676965_C 0.65 0.45 to 0.94 0.021 0.149
rs6468442_A 0.77 0.54 to 1.09 0.141 0.644
rs4976890_T 0.85 0.62 to 1.18 0.328 0.944
rs6982156_G 0.89 0.65 to 1.22 0.482 0.994
rs6998793_T 1.13 0.85 to 1.50 0.413 0.981

OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval.

a

Additive model includes adjustment for age and sex.

b

P-value from permutation testing.

These polymorphisms localize to a 16 kb region of high LD, suggesting they may serve as markers for functional SNPs involved in BAVM pathogenesis (Figure 1). Haplotype analysis of SNPs within this LD block (n=4) revealed a significant overall association (Table 5, χ2=12.55, 4 df, P=0.014); 2 haplotypes (ATCC, P=0.006 and GGCT, P=0.008) were associated with risk of BAVM. The most significantly associated haplotype (ATCC) was consistent with the individual SNP analysis, as it contains the minor allele for the significantly associated SNP (rs7015566, A). In a follow-up analysis, we also genotyped synonymous SNP rs16887051 in exon 2, which was not associated with BAVM susceptibility (P=0.744).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Linkage disequilibrium (LD) structure for GPR124 locus. GPR124 SNPs are represented in order on the chromosome. LD between SNPs is represented both numerically (r2) and by the depth of shading (D) computed using all genotype data from the 195 BAVM patients and 243 controls. One haplotype block exists in this GPR124 region spanning SNPs rs7015566 – rs12676965.

Table 5.

Association of GPR124 Haplotypes with Risk of BAVM

Haplotypea Frequency Estimates χ2 df P

Cases Controls
Global NA NA 12.55 4 0.014

ATCC 0.14 0.22 7.67 1 0.006
GGAT 0.22 0.20 0.20 1 0.653
ATCT 0.05 0.07 1.65 1 0.199
AGCT 0.01 0.02 1.26 1 0.261
GGCT 0.58 0.49 7.14 1 0.008
a

Fixed window haplotype, 5′ →3′ rs7015566, rs7823249, rs17433803, rs12676965 df, degrees of freedom

In a secondary analysis, we assessed whether any of the GPR124 SNPs were associated with ICH presentation among BAVM patients. 81 of 195 (42%) BAVM cases presented with ICH. SNP rs17433803 was marginally associated with ICH presentation after adjustment for age and sex (OR=1.95, 95% CI=1.15 – 3.30, unadjusted P=0.013); however, this SNP was not associated after permutation testing (P=0.10). Other GPR124 SNPs (P>0.05, data not shown) nor haplotypes (χ2=7.42, 4 df, P=0.115) were associated with the risk of ICH presentation.

Sequencing

Sequencing of exon 2 and four highly conserved regions within the surrounding LD block in 24 BAVM cases revealed a novel complex insertion deletion polymorphism (indel) located in intron 2 (hg18, chr8:37799084 – 37799104) (Figure 2). Compared to reference sequence (hg18), 3/20 individuals were homozygous for the insertion. This indel polymorphism has not been previously reported, however there are 8 known SNPs that overlap it (dbSNP 135). This indel appears to be linked to the BAVM associated rs7015566 because 2/20 BAVM cases with the AA genotype are also homozygous for the insertion sequence in the conserved region (CONS4), one BAVM case that was heterozygous for SNP rs7015566 is also homozygous for the indel and none of the rs7015566 GG samples bear the indel.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Identification of a complex insertion/deletion polymorphism in GPR124 gene conserved region. Sequencing of exon 2 and 4 conserved intronic regions across GPR124 led to the identification of a 4 base insertion (TTTA, pink box) and 10 base deletion (blue box) located in conserved region 4 (CONS4), in a region between two highly conserved sequences (hg18, chr8:37799084 – 37799104).

GPR124 Expression in Human Vasculature

Protein expression analysis showed that GPR124 is co-expressed with CD31 in both normal human brain vasculature and two pathological brain samples including BAVM in a patient with HHT and a pilocytic astrocytoma sample (Figure 3A). We also evaluated GPR124 protein expression in unruptured BAVM vessels from patients with sporadic BAVM compared to control brain vessels (STA and cerebral cortex). GPR124 protein had apparent localization to the endothelium in both BAVM and control vessels, shown by the intense brown GPR124 staining along the endothelial cell layer (Figure 3B inset, black arrows). We did not observe any qualitative difference in GPR124 protein expression between BAVM and control vessels.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

GPR124 protein expression in human brain vessels. a Immunofluorescence shows co-expression (merge, yellow) of GPR124 (red) and CD31 endothelial cell marker (green) in normal (top panel) and malformed human vessels (BAVM from HHT patient and human pilocytic astrocytoma). b GPR124 immunostaining in sporadic BAVM vessels (left panel) and control brain vessels (right panel) including superficial temporal artery (STA) and cerebral cortex vessels. GPR124 protein has apparent localization to the endothelium (black arrows) in both AVM and control brain vessels.

Discussion

We provide the first report of an association between genetic variation in the GPR124 gene with risk of BAVM. In this population of Caucasians, we identified SNP rs7015566 located in intron 1 that contributes to a reduced risk of BAVM in individuals who carry the minor allele. Case-only analyses suggest this finding is specific to BAVM susceptibility; however, our study sample size was too small to detect significant differences in MAF associated with ICH presentation. Haplotypes were consistent with the SNP analysis; the minor allele A for rs7015566 was present in the most significant haplotype (ATCC), which was associated with reduced BAVM risk. The associated SNP was selected as a haplotype-tagging SNP and is located in a well-conserved region with no known function. Hence, the SNP is likely not causal, but a surrogate marker in LD with functional polymorphisms located elsewhere in the GPR124 gene, in a closely neighboring gene or in a regulatory element.

GPR124 encodes the GPR124 protein that belongs to the large family of long N-terminal group B (LNB) G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). GPR124, originally named tumor endothelial marker 5 (TEM5), is an orphan receptor whose signaling mechanism is not yet known. This gene has 4 known protein-coding transcripts and 2 noncoding transcripts. However, SNP rs7015566 and the novel indel polymorphism identified in this study, are not located near a splice site (closest site is 1274 bp downstream from rs7813990); therefore, these polymorphisms are not likely to influence splicing efficiency. The associated SNP is located near exon 2, which encodes one of the four leucine-rich repeat protein domains that may provide a framework for GPR124 protein-protein interactions and facilitate involvement in a variety of biological processes such as angiogenesis and vasculogenesis. It has been well-documented that noncoding sequences may function as gene regulatory elements [39]. Thus, one explanation for our findings is that SNP rs7015566 may be in disequilibrium with other GPR124 SNPs located in exons or regulatory elements that may be protective of BAVM by affecting GPR124 gene or encoded protein expression, or influencing receptor-ligand binding.

We recently proposed a “response-to-injury” paradigm to explain sporadic BAVM pathogenesis [10]. In this model, an inciting event (e.g., trauma, infection, inflammation, etc.) that normally triggers angiogenesis, endothelial mitogenesis, and vascular stabilization, instead shifts toward an abnormal dysplastic response when there is an underlying genetic background or environmental insult. While the exact mechanism is unknown, the high prevalence of BAVM in patients with HHT (mutations in ACVRL1, ENG, or SMAD4) suggests genetic variation in TGF-β signaling genes or angiogenic factors, such as GPR124, may contribute to an underlying genetic background that influences sporadic AVM pathogenesis. In our study, we observed expression of GPR124 protein in BAVM vessels from both sporadic and HHT patients. Consistent with previous studies, GPR124 localized to the endothelium [40] and expression levels qualitatively appeared similar to control vessels. Brain AVMs from HHT patients may have differences in GPR124 expression and/or localization compared to sporadic brain AVMs; however, we were not able to identify such differences in the current study. Our immunohistochemical analysis is a descriptive study of GPR124 expression in a limited number of AVM and control brain vessels. A larger number of patient samples would need to be evaluated to accurately estimate any difference in GPR124 expression between AVM and controls. While we did not detect a difference in GPR124 expression in AVMs and controls, it is possible that GPR124 expression may be altered during development or at different stages of brain AVM pathogenesis (i.e., AVM formation or growth). While these data support a role for GPR124 in the adult brain vasculature, additional studies will be needed to determine the functional role of GPR124 genetic variation in human AVM pathogenesis.

Recent evidence described by Anderson et al (2011) suggests that GPR124 normally modulates signaling through the TGF-β pathway [25]. Further, deletion of GPR124 resulted in angiogenic defect [22] and increased expression of endoglin, a coreceptor for Alk1 [25]. In vitro studies have also suggested a potential functional role for GPR124 in endothelial cell migration and proliferation [22, 41]. In addition, a soluble fragment (sGPR124) is shed by endothelial cells during capillary-like network formation and upon growth factor stimulation [40]. Interestingly, proteolytically processed sGPR124 mediates endothelial cell survival during angiogenesis by linking integrin αVβ3 to glycosaminoglycans [40]. Taken together with our current genetic association finding, it is plausible that GPR124 may be involved dysregulated angiogenesis or endothelial cell function that influences the development of sporadic BAVMs. Thus, a better understanding of the relationship between GPR124 and TGF-β signaling may offer insight into BAVM pathogenesis.

Our study had several limitations: (1) the analysis was restricted to Caucasians, and risk estimates may differ or be absent in other race/ethnic groups; (2) individuals were self-reported Caucasian therefore population stratification may exist; (3) replication in additional cohorts is needed to provide a more reliable estimate of the effect size and rule out false-positive results; and (4) limited tissue was available for patients homozygous for rs7015566 major allele, thus we were unable to estimate the correlation between rs7015566 genotype on GPR124 protein expression. Future studies will need to evaluate a larger number of patients with BAVM to examine functionality.

Conclusions

In conclusion, SNP rs7015566 located in intron 1 of GPR124 was associated with reduced risk of BAVM in Caucasian patients. These findings suggest that genetic variation in GPR124 contributes to BAVM risk and warrant further investigation into the role of GPCRs in BAVM pathogenesis.

Supplementary Material

Suppl Mat'l

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank patients who participated in this study, and members of the Brain AVM Project for assistance with patient recruitment, technical support, and data management. This study was supported by National Institutes of Health grants: K23 NS058357 (HK), R01 NS034949 (WLY), P01 NS044155 (WLY), R01 NS064517 (CJK), R01 NS052830 (CJK), and T32 GM008440 (SW); American Heart Association Western States Affiliate Post-doctoral Fellowship 10POST3640020 (SW) and Pre-doctoral Fellowship (MRM); Sarnoff Foundation Research Fellowship (ADB); and Medical Scientist Training Program at Stanford University (MRM). The contents are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.

Abbreviations

ACVRL1

activin A receptor type II-like 1

ANG2

Angiopoietin 2

ANGPTL4

Angiopoietin-like 4

BAVM

brain arteriovenous malformation

CI

confidence interval

CNS

central nervous system

df

degrees of freedom

ENG

endoglin

EPHB4

EPH receptor B4

GPCR

G protein-coupled receptor

GPR124

G protein-coupled receptor 124

HHT

hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia

HOXD3

Homeobox D3

HWE

Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium

ICH

intracranial hemorrhage

IL-1α

Interleukin 1 alpha

IL-1β

Interleukin 1 beta

IL-1RN

Interleukin 1 receptor antagonist

IL-6

Interleukin 6

LD

linkage disequilibrium

LNB

long N-terminal group B

MAF

minor allele frequency

MHF

minor haplotype frequency

OCT

optimized cutting temperature

OR

Odds ratio

PCR

polymerase chain reaction

PFA

paraformaldehyde

SMAD4

SMAD family member 4

SNP

single nucleotide polymorphism

STA

superficial temporal artery

TEM5

Terminal endothelial marker 5

TGF-β

Transforming growth factor beta

VEGF

Vascular endothelial growth factor

References

  • 1.Choi JH, Mohr JP. Brain arteriovenous malformations in adults. Lancet Neurol. 2005;4(5):299–308. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(05)70073-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Fleetwood IG, Steinberg GK. Arteriovenous malformations. Lancet. 2002;359(9309):863–73. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(02)07946-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Rost NS, Greenberg SM, Rosand J. The genetic architecture of intracerebral hemorrhage. Stroke. 2008;39(7):2166–73. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.107.501650. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Kim H, Marchuk DA, Pawlikowska L, Chen Y, Su H, Yang GY, et al. Genetic considerations relevant to intracranial hemorrhage and brain arteriovenous malformations. Acta Neurochir Suppl. 2008;105:199–206. doi: 10.1007/978-3-211-09469-3_38. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Weinsheimer S, Kim H, Pawlikowska L, Chen Y, Lawton MT, Sidney S, et al. EPHB4 gene polymorphisms and risk of intracranial hemorrhage in patients with brain arteriovenous malformations. Circ Cardiovasc Genet. 2009;2(5):476–82. doi: 10.1161/CIRCGENETICS.109.883595. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Kim H, Hysi PG, Pawlikowska L, Poon A, Burchard EG, Zaroff JG, et al. Common variants in interleukin-1-beta gene are associated with intracranial hemorrhage and susceptibility to brain arteriovenous malformation. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2009;27(2):176–82. doi: 10.1159/000185609. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Stapleton CJ, Armstrong DL, Zidovetzki R, Liu CY, Giannotta SL, Hofman FM. Thrombospondin-1 modulates the angiogenic phenotype of human cerebral arteriovenous malformation endothelial cells. Neurosurgery. 2011;68(5):1342–53. doi: 10.1227/NEU.0b013e31820c0a68. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Hao Q, Zhu Y, Su H, Shen F, Yang GY, Kim H, et al. VEGF induces more severe cerebrovascular dysplasia in Endoglin+/− than in Alk1+/− mice. Transl Stroke Res. 2010;1(3):197–201. doi: 10.1007/s12975-010-0020-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Walker EJ, Su H, Shen F, Choi EJ, Oh SP, Chen G, et al. Arteriovenous malformation in the adult mouse brain resembling the human disease. Ann Neurol. 2011;69(6):954–62. doi: 10.1002/ana.22348. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Kim H, Su H, Weinsheimer S, Pawlikowska L, Young WL. Brain arteriovenous malformation pathogenesis: a response-to-injury paradigm. Acta Neurochir Suppl. 2011;111:83–92. doi: 10.1007/978-3-7091-0693-8_14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Mikhak B, Weinsheimer S, Pawlikowska L, Poon A, Kwok PY, Lawton MT, et al. Angiopoietin-like 4 (ANGPTL4) gene polymorphisms and risk of brain arteriovenous malformations. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2011;31(4):338–45. doi: 10.1159/000322601. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Chen Y, Pawlikowska L, Yao JS, Shen F, Zhai W, Achrol AS, et al. Interleukin-6 involvement in brain arteriovenous malformations. Ann Neurol. 2006;59(1):72–80. doi: 10.1002/ana.20697. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Fontanella M, Rubino E, Crobeddu E, Gallone S, Gentile S, Garbossa D, et al. Brain arteriovenous malformations are associated with interleukin-1 cluster gene polymorphisms. Neurosurgery. 2012;70(1):12–7. doi: 10.1227/NEU.0b013e31822d9881. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.ZhuGe Q, Zhong M, Zheng W, Yang GY, Mao X, Xie L, et al. Notch1 signaling is activated in brain arteriovenous malformation in humans. Brain. 2009;132(Pt 12):3231–41. doi: 10.1093/brain/awp246. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Chen Y, Xu B, Arderiu G, Hashimoto T, Young WL, Boudreau NJ, et al. Retroviral delivery of homeobox d3 gene induces cerebral angiogenesis in mice. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2004;24(11):1280–7. doi: 10.1097/01.WCB.0000141770.09022.AB. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Maisonpierre PC, Suri C, Jones PF, Bartunkova S, Wiegand SJ, Radziejewski C, et al. Angiopoietin-2, a natural antagonist for Tie2 that disrupts in vivo angiogenesis. Science. 1997;277(5322):55–60. doi: 10.1126/science.277.5322.55. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Davis S, Aldrich TH, Jones PF, Acheson A, Compton DL, Jain V, et al. Isolation of angiopoietin-1, a ligand for the TIE2 receptor, by secretion-trap expression cloning. Cell. 1996;87(7):1161–9. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81812-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Hashimoto T, Wu Y, Lawton MT, Yang GY, Barbaro NM, Young WL. Co-expression of angiogenic factors in brain arteriovenous malformations. Neurosurgery. 2005;56(5):1058–65. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Sandalcioglu IE, Wende D, Eggert A, Muller D, Roggenbuck U, Gasser T, et al. Vascular endothelial growth factor plasma levels are significantly elevated in patients with cerebral arteriovenous malformations. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2006;21(3):154–8. doi: 10.1159/000090526. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Sandalcioglu IE, Asgari S, Wende D, van de Nes JA, Dumitru CA, Zhu Y, et al. Proliferation activity is significantly elevated in partially embolized cerebral arteriovenous malformations. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2010;30(4):396–401. doi: 10.1159/000319568. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Martiny-Baron G, Holzer P, Billy E, Schnell C, Brueggen J, Ferretti M, et al. The small molecule specific EphB4 kinase inhibitor NVP-BHG712 inhibits VEGF driven angiogenesis. Angiogenesis. 2010;13(3):259–67. doi: 10.1007/s10456-010-9183-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Kuhnert F, Mancuso MR, Shamloo A, Wang HT, Choksi V, Florek M, et al. Essential regulation of CNS angiogenesis by the orphan G protein-coupled receptor GPR124. Science. 2010;330(6006):985–9. doi: 10.1126/science.1196554. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.St Croix B, Rago C, Velculescu V, Traverso G, Romans KE, Montgomery E, et al. Genes expressed in human tumor endothelium. Science. 2000;289(5482):1197–202. doi: 10.1126/science.289.5482.1197. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Carson-Walter EB, Watkins DN, Nanda A, Vogelstein B, Kinzler KW, St Croix B. Cell surface tumor endothelial markers are conserved in mice and humans. Cancer Res. 2001;61(18):6649–55. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Anderson KD, Pan L, Yang XM, Hughes VC, Walls JR, Dominguez MG, et al. Angiogenic sprouting into neural tissue requires Gpr124, an orphan G protein-coupled receptor. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011;108(7):2807–12. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1019761108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Cullen M, Elzarrad MK, Seaman S, Zudaire E, Stevens J, Yang MY, et al. GPR124, an orphan G protein-coupled receptor, is required for CNS-specific vascularization and establishment of the blood-brain barrier. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011;108(14):5759–64. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1017192108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Kim H, Sidney S, McCulloch CE, Poon KY, Singh V, Johnston SC, et al. Racial/ethnic differences in longitudinal risk of intracranial hemorrhage in brain arteriovenous malformation patients. Stroke. 2007;38(9):2430–37. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.107.485573. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Halim AX, Singh V, Johnston SC, Higashida RT, Dowd CF, Halbach VV, et al. Characteristics of brain arteriovenous malformations with coexisting aneurysms: a comparison of two referral centers. Stroke. 2002;33(3):675–9. doi: 10.1161/hs0302.104104. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Achrol AS, Pawlikowska L, McCulloch CE, Poon KY, Ha C, Zaroff JG, et al. Tumor necrosis factor-alpha-238G>A promoter polymorphism is associated with increased risk of new hemorrhage in the natural course of patients with brain arteriovenous malformations. Stroke. 2006;37(1):231–4. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000195133.98378.4b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Atkinson RP, Awad IA, Batjer HH, Dowd CF, Furlan A, Giannotta SL, et al. Reporting terminology for brain arteriovenous malformation clinical and radiographic features for use in clinical trials. Stroke. 2001;32(6):1430–42. doi: 10.1161/01.str.32.6.1430. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Shu Y, Brown C, Castro RA, Shi RJ, Lin ET, Owen RP, et al. Effect of genetic variation in the organic cation transporter 1, OCT1, on metformin pharmacokinetics. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2008;83(2):273–80. doi: 10.1038/sj.clpt.6100275. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.de Bakker PI, Yelensky R, Pe’er I, Gabriel SB, Daly MJ, Altshuler D. Efficiency and power in genetic association studies. Nat Genet. 2005;37(11):1217–23. doi: 10.1038/ng1669. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Barrett JC, Fry B, Maller J, Daly MJ. Haploview: analysis and visualization of LD and haplotype maps. Bioinformatics. 2005;21(2):263–5. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bth457. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Hsu TM, Kwok PY. Homogeneous primer extension assay with fluorescence polarization detection. Methods Mol Biol. 2003;212:177–87. doi: 10.1385/1-59259-327-5:177. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Purcell S, Neale B, Todd-Brown K, Thomas L, Ferreira MA, Bender D, et al. PLINK: a tool set for whole-genome association and population-based linkage analyses. Am J Hum Genet. 2007;81(3):559–75. doi: 10.1086/519795. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Cavalli-Sforza LL, Bodmer WF. The Genetics of Human Populations. Mineola, NY: Dover Publications; 1999. [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Lunetta KL. Genetic association studies. Circulation. 2008;118(1):96–101. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.700401. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Rozen S, Skaletsky HJ. Primer3 on the WWW for general users and for biologist programmers. In: Krawetz S, Misener S, editors. Bioinformatics Methods and Protocols: Methods in Molecular Biology. Totowa, NJ: Humana Press; 2000. pp. 365–86. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Orom UA, Shiekhattar R. Noncoding RNAs and enhancers: complications of a long-distance relationship. Trends Genet. 2011;27(10):433–9. doi: 10.1016/j.tig.2011.06.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Vallon M, Essler M. Proteolytically processed soluble tumor endothelial marker (TEM) 5 mediates endothelial cell survival during angiogenesis by linking integrin alpha(v)beta3 to glycosaminoglycans. J Biol Chem. 2006;281(45):34179–88. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M605291200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Vallon M, Rohde F, Janssen KP, Essler M. Tumor endothelial marker 5 expression in endothelial cells during capillary morphogenesis is induced by the small GTPase Rac and mediates contact inhibition of cell proliferation. Exp Cell Res. 2010;316(3):412–21. doi: 10.1016/j.yexcr.2009.10.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Suppl Mat'l

RESOURCES