Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Feb 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Clin Gastroenterol. 2013 Feb;47(2):182–187. doi: 10.1097/MCG.0b013e318264181d

Hepatic Steatosis in HIV: A Prospective Study in Patients without Viral Hepatitis, Diabetes, or Alcohol Abuse

Richard K Sterling 1,2, Paula G Smith 1, Elizabeth M Brunt 3
PMCID: PMC3544978  NIHMSID: NIHMS393866  PMID: 23059409

Abstract

Background and Aims

Abnormal liver enzymes (LE) are common in those infected with HIV. Histologic data on those with abnormal LE without viral hepatitis are lacking.

Methods

HIV positive subjects without HCV, HBV, alcohol abuse, and DM with more than 1 abnormal LE, defined as 1.25 ULN in AST, ALT, or ALP, over 6 months were included. Subjects underwent a 2 hr oral glucose tolerance test, fasting lipids, insulin and glucose for insulin resistance (IR) by HOMA-IR and DEXA for fat distribution. Biopsies were read blindly to clinical data, and scored by Ishak histologic activity index (HAI) for inflammation and fibrosis and NAFLD Activity Score (NAS).

Results

Fourteen patients underwent biopsy. All were on highly active anti-retroviral therapy (HAART) with undetectable HIV RNA and mean CD4 614. The HAI scores for inflammation and fibrosis were 3.43(1.4) and 1.71(1.26), respectively, and 2 patients had advanced fibrosis (bridging fibrosis/cirrhosis). The majority (65%) of patients had steatosis: grade 1:21%, grade 2:28%, and grade 3:14%. Hepatocyte ballooning was seen in 7 (40%) but NASH was diagnosed only in 4(26%). NAS score of all biopsies of 3.07(2.2; range 0–5). Insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) was higher in those with compared to those without steatosis (3.52 vs. 1.91; p=.11) and highest in those with NASH (4.89). Using multivariate logistic regression, only increased GGT (p=.0009) predicted steatosis while HOMA-IR (p=.0046) predicted NASH.

Conclusions

Although steatosis is common in HIV patients with abnormal LE without DM, alcohol, or viral hepatitis coinfection, NASH was observed in only 26%. The only clinical or laboratory feature associated with biopsy proven steatosis and NASH were GGT and a calculated measure of insulin resistance, respectively. Further studies are needed in this population to determine the long term clinical significance.

Keywords: HIV, steatosis, NASH

Introduction

Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection is a global health concern with an over 1,000,000 infected in the United States and 42 million worldwide. With the advent of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART), the morbidity and mortality related to HIV have significantly decreased (1;2). As a result, patients are now living longer with HIV infection, and other co-morbidities such as hepatic events have emerged as a key issue in the management of HIV-infected patients (3). Because the main focus on liver disease in patients with HIV has been on coinfection with HCV and HBV, there has been little attention to other liver diseases such as steatohepatitis (SH).

Abnormal liver enzymes are common and occur in 40–60% of patients on current HAART regimens even in the absence of HCV or HBV (46) and their management remains a challenge (7). This high proportion is far greater than expected in the general population of 8% (8). In a recent large study of almost 6000 HIV patients, the prevalence of abnormal ALT and AST in subjects without HCV was 55% and 76% respectively (9). Most clinical studies on hepatoxicity of HAART have focused on patients with severe liver enzyme elevations (defined as ≥ 5x the upper limit of normal (ULN) (5; 1012). However, the majority of patients with abnormal liver enzymes have mild to moderate enzyme elevations (1.25 to 5 × ULN), and there are few studies with histologic data in these individuals. Although small studies suggest the increases in liver enzymes are due to steatohepatitis, they included patients with diabetes (DM), alcohol use, and features of the metabolic syndrome (MS), all of which are known risk factors for steatosis and steatohepatitis (1315). Therefore, histologic data in HIV subjects with increased liver enzymes without viral hepatitis, DM, MS, and alcohol is lacking. We hypothesized that increased liver enzymes in HIV patients without viral hepatitis, diabetes, or excessive alcohol use are due to steatohepatitis. To address this gap in our knowledge, we performed a prospective study to define the spectrum of histology in a cohort of HIV infected patients with abnormal liver enzymes in the absence of HCV, HBV, DM and alcohol use.

Methods

Patients and Study Design

This is a prospective, cross-sectional cohort study in adult HIV positive subjects with more than 1 abnormal liver enzyme, defined as 1.25 to 5 times ULN in aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), or alkaline phosphatase (ALP), over 6 months seen between 2007–2011. All patients tested negative for HCV antibody and RNA, HBV surface antigen and DNA, had normal A1AT, ceruloplasmin, and were negative for ANA, ASMA, and AMA. Additional exclusion criteria included history of DM, alcohol use (> 30g/day in men and 20g/day in women), hepatic decompensation (prothrombin time prolonged > 2 seconds, INR > 1.5, ascites, hepatic encephalopathy, serum conjugated bilirubin > 3.0), thrombocytopenia (platelets < 80,000), concomitant use of vitamin E, thiazolidinediones, metformin, or insulin, use of medications associated with steatosis and/or steatohepatitis (amiodarone, methotrexate, corticosteroids, estrogen, and tamoxifen), renal failure (serum creatinine > 3.0), and advanced HIV disease with life expectancy less than 1 year. Alcohol consumption was assessed by AUDIT (16) and subjects with a score greater than 2 were excluded.

After informed consent, demographic (age, gender, ethnicity) and clinical (mode of acquisition of HIV, year of HIV diagnosis, duration of disease, current and past anti-retroviral therapy including nucleoside/tide reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NRTI), protease inhibitor (PI), and non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI) data were collected). On the day of the biopsy, fasting serum AST, ALT, ALP, total bilirubin, albumin, gamma glutamyl transpeptidase (GGT), complete blood count (CBC) and differential, CD4 and CD8 count (absolute and %), HIV RNA (Roche Amplicor Monitor), lipid profile (serum cholesterol, triglycerides, HDL, and LDL), and free fatty acids (FFA) were collected. Anthropometric measurements (waist:hip ratio, body mass index, % body fat) were assessed by trained clinical research staff. Fasting blood glucose and insulin level for calculation of HOMA-IR, a measure of insulin resistance, were obtained prior to a 2 hour oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT). Insulin resistance was defined as a HOMA-IR > 2.5. DEXA for total body composition with analysis for regional fat distribution and peripheral lipoatrophy was obtained. (Hologic Inc., Bedford, MA) (17;18). The NCEP ATP III criteria were used to define the metabolic syndrome (19). This included 3 or more of the following factors: a waist circumference >40 inches in men and > 35 inches in women, triglyceride level ≥ 150 mg/dl, HDL < 40 mg/dl in men and < 50 mg/dl in women, blood pressure > 130/85 mm Hg, and fasting plasma glucose ≥ 110 mg/dl.

Liver Histology

All histology was obtained by percutaneous liver biopsy in the standard fashion. Formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded liver tissue was sectioned, slides coded, and unstained slides were stained by hematoxylin-eosin, Masson’s trichrome, PAS-D, Perls’ Prussian blue, and reticulin stain. Additional stains for opportunistic infections (Ziehl-Nelsen, Gomori Methenamine Silver), were performed. Histology was assessed for lobular and portal inflammation, portal and perisinusoidal fibrosis, steatosis, steatosis with inflammation, SH, “cryptogenic hepatitis”, HSV, CMV, granulomas,eosinophils, globules and iron deposition by a single pathologist (EMB) blinded to all identifying information as well as clinical data. Biopsies with features of chronic hepatitis were further assessed by the Ishak Histologic Activity Index (HAI) (20). Diagnostic categories of NAFLD included not NAFLD (i.e. <5% steatosis), steatosis, steatosis with inflammation and definite non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH). The method of scoring the individual histologic features of NASH are detailed (21) and diagnosis and scores were performed separately (22).

Statistical Analysis

We defined abnormal liver enzymes according to the NIH-NIAI Guidelines (AIDS Clinical Trial Group) as follows: grade 0: < 1.25 × ULN, grade 1: 1.25–2.5 ULN, grade 2: 2.6–5.0 ULN, grade 3: 5.1–10 × ULN, and grade 4: > 10 × ULN. At out center, ULN values were: AST 50 U/L, ALT 60 U/L for men and 50 U/L for women, and ALP 120 U/L. Clinical variables were determined at the time biopsy. All data were assessed for normality and presented as mean (±SD), median (IQR) or proportions as appropriate. The primary endpoint was to determine the prevalence and factors associated with hepatic steatosis, defined as > 5%. A diagnosis of NASH was based on the histopathologic pattern of lesions of steatosis, ballooning and lobular/portal inflammation (21; 22).

Subjects with and without steatosis and with and without NASH were compared. Differences were assessed by T-test, chi-square, or Fisher’s exact test as appropriate. Univariate analysis was used to determine factors associated with steatosis. Analysis of variance was used to compare continuous variables and Pearson chi square to compare categorical variables. Multivariable logistic regression (MLR) was then used to identify independent predictors of steatosis. All tests were two-sided and a p value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. All analyses were performed by JMP IN 8.0 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC). This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board (IRB) for the study of Human Subjects at VCUHS.

Results

During the study period, 31 subjects with HIV, abnormal liver enzymes, and no evidence HCV or HBV were evaluated, of which 14 met inclusion/exclusion criteria and underwent biopsy. The reasons for exclusion were refused liver biopsy (n=6), excess alcohol use (n=3), cryptococcal infection (n=2), DM (n=1), or normalization of liver enzymes over a 6 month observation period, and active substance abuse, medication induced, and HIV associated cholangiopathy (1 each). Subjects who did not undergo biopsy were more likely women but otherwise similar in other demographic, clinical and laboratory characteristics to subjects included in the analysis. Table 1 shows the demographic and clinical characteristics of the cohort. The mean age was 45 years, 71% were men, and 57% were Caucasian. All subjects were on HAART with 85% on a NRTI, 57% on a NNRTI, and 42% were on a PI. The mean BMI and percent body fat were 29.9 kg/m2 and 33.5%, respectively. Although no patients included had a prior clinical history of DM, 3 subjects had an abnormal OGTT.

Table 1.

Patient Characteristics

Characteristic N = 14
Age (years) 45 ± 10
Male 71 %
Caucasian 57 %
Weight (kg) 89 ± 18
Body Mass Index 29.9 ± 7.4
Waist (cm) 99.9 ± 7.9
Waist:Hip ratio 0.94 ± 0.06
% body fat (skin fold) 33.5 ± 8.1
Abdominal fat (g) 4148 ± 2060
Abdominal:gynoid fat ratio 1.36 ± 0.78
HAART use 100%
NRTI use 85%
NNRTI use 57%
PI use 42%
Abnormal OGTT 3/14 (21%)

Data presented as mean ± SD or %

Table 2 shows the summary laboratory and histology characteristics of the cohort. All subjects had undetectable HIV RNA and the mean CD4 count was 614mm 3/L. The mean AST, ALT, and ALP values were 76 U/L, 94 U/L, and 114 U/L, respectively. The mean HOMA-IR was 2.95 ± 1.83; 57% had a HOMA-IR > 2.5. Using the Ishak HAI, the mean total inflammation and fibrosis scores were 3.42 and 1.71, respectively. Table 3 shows the specific histologic pattern for each patient. Five patients had non-specific hepatitis without steatosis. Hepatic steatosis >5% was present in 9 (65%) of patients: grade 1 (5–33%): 21%, grade 2 (34–66%): 28%, and grade 3 (>67%): 14%. The overall NAS in the cohort was 3.07, and ranged from 0 (in 2) to 5 (in 5). While 9 had steatosis with inflammation with or without hepatocellular ballooning, only 4 (26%) met histologic diagnostic criteria for NASH. No patient had evidence of other pathologic findings (see methods) except 2 patients had increased iron (2+ hepatocellular in zone 1). Neither of these patients had biochemical evidence of iron overload (iron saturation <40%). Two patients had advanced fibrosis (bridging fibrosis or cirrhosis).

Table 2.

Laboratory and Histologic findings

Characteristic N = 14
AST (U/L) 76 ± 46
ALT (U/L) 94 ± 58
ALP (U/L) 114 ± 45
CD4 (cells/uL) 614± 357
GGT (U/L) 137 ± 147
CD4% 29 ± 14
HIV < 50 copies/mL 100%
Total Cholesterol 172 ± 38
HDL mg/dL 40 ± 10
LDL mg/dL 89 ± 28
Triglyceride mg/dL 235 ± 180
HOMA-IR 2.95 ± 1.83
HOMA-IR > 2.5 (%) 57
Total Inflammation 3.43 ± 1.39
Piecemeal necrosis* 0.93 ± 0.61
Lobular inflammation* 1.5 ± 0.76
Portal inflammation* 0.93 ± 0.47
Fibrosis* 1.71 ± 1.26
Advanced fibrosis (%) 14
Steatosis grade
(% 0/1/2/3)
0: 36
1: 21
2: 28
3: 14
Hepatocyte ballooning 50%
NAS (0–8) 3.07 ± 2.2
Steatohepatitis 26%

Data expressed as mean (± SD) or %

*

Ishak scoring system

Advanced fibrosis = bridging fibrosis or cirrhosis

Table 3.

Histologic characteristics of the cohort

CASE
#
Ishak
Grade 0–18
Ishak
Fibrosis
Score
0–6
Steatosis
0–3
Steatosis
Location
Lobular
Inflammation
0–3
Hepatocellular
Ballooning 0–2
NAS
0–8
NAS
Fibrosis
Score 0–4
Iron score :0–4 RE:
pos/neg
Histologic Diagnoses
1 1+0+1+1=3 5 1 Azonal 1 2 4 3 punctate RE NASH
2 1+0+2+1+4 1 2 Zone 3 2 1 5 1b neg NASH
3 2+0+1+1=4 1 0 Azonal 1 0 1 1c 2+ zone 1 hepatocytes Non-specific inflammation
4 1+0+2+1=4 4 3 Panacinar 1 0 4 3 rare KC Steatosis with inflammation
5 2+0+2+2=6 2 2 Zone 3 1 0 3 2 neg Steatosis with inflammation
6 0+0+1+0=1 1 0 Azonal 0 0 0 1c neg Non-specific inflammation
7 1+0+3+1=5 2 1 Azonal 3 1 5 2 neg Steatosis with inflammation
8 0+0+1+0=1 1 0 Azonal 1 0 1 1b neg Non-specific inflammation
9 1+0+2+1=4 1 2 Azonal 1 1 4 1b neg Steatosis with inflammation
10 1+0+1+1=3 1 0 Azonal 0 0 0 1b neg Non-specific inflammation
11 1+0+2+1=4 1 1 Zone 3 2 2 5 1b punctate RE NASH
12 1+0+1+1=3 2 3 Panacinar 1 1 5 2 neg Steatosis with inflammation
13 0+0+1+1=2 1 0 Azonal 1 0 1 1c 2+ zone 1 hepatocytes Non-specific inflammation
14 1+0+2+1=4 1 2 Panacinar 2 1 5 1b neg NASH

Table 4 compares cases with ≥5% steatosis to those with <5% steatosis. Although cases with steatosis had more total hepatic inflammation (4.11 vs. 2.20; p=.007), there were no differences when comparing mean fibrosis scores (2.1 vs. 1.0; p=0.11). Both of the subjects with advanced fibrosis had steatosis. As expected, the NAS was significantly higher in cases with steatosis compared to cases without (4.4 vs. 0.6; p<.001). Subjects whose biopsies had NASH had the highest HOMA-IR (4.49; p=.04) compared to those without NASH. Further, all subjects with biopsy-diagnosed NASH had a HOM-IR > 2.5. Using multivariate logistic regression, only increased GGT (p=.09) predicted steatosis while only increased HOMA-IR (p=.0046) predicted NASH.

Table 4.

Comparison of those with and without Steatosis

Characteristic Steatosis
Absent
(<5%) (n=5)
Steatosis
Present (≥ 5%)
(n=9)
P value
Age 42 ± 11 47 ± 9 0.42
Gender (% male) 60 77 0.48
Caucasian (%) 40 66 0.33
AST (U/L) 56 ± 37 87 ± 48 0.24
ALT (U/L) 67 ± 66 109 ± 50 0.20
ALP (U/L) 103 ± 40 121 ± 49 0.51
Total cholesterol mg/dL 153 ± 36 183 ± 37 0.17
HDL mg/dL 39 ± 4.7 40 ± 10 0.83
Triglyceride mg/dL 143 ± 46 287 ± 209 0.16
LDL mg/dL 85 ± 20 91 ± 32 0.70
GGT U/L 49 ± 17 186 ± 165 0.09
Abnormal OGTT (%) 0 33 0.07
Hepatic inflammation (Ishak) 2.20 ± 1.30 4.11 ± 0.93 0.007
BMI 27 ± 4.32 31 ± 8.7 0.
Body fat (%) 32.7 ± 3.7 33.9 ± 8.7 0.80
Abdominal fat (g) 3659 ± 984 4454 ± 2539 0.52
HOMA-IR 1.91 ± 1.14 3.52 ± 1.94 0.11
HOMA-IR >2.5 (%) 40 66 0.33
Fibrosis 1. 0 ± 0.0 2.1 ± 1.45 0.11
Advanced fibrosis (%) 0 22 0.16
NAS 0.60 ± 0.55 4.44 ± 0.73 <.0001

There were no differences in HAART use or CD4 count (data not reported)

Discussion

Abnormal liver enzymes in patients with HIV are common and occur in 40–76% of patients on current HAART regimens even in the absence of HCV or HBV (46) and are common in those without HCV (9).

Because the majority of these patients have mild to moderate liver enzyme elevations (1.25 to 5 × ULN), there are few histologic data in individuals with mild to moderate elevations in liver enzymes and no viral hepatitis.

In HIV uninfected individuals, a major cause for abnormal liver enzymes in the absence of viral hepatitis and alcohol is nonalcoholic fatty liver (23). The majority of these individuals have features of the metabolic syndrome and insulin resistance (24). Most histology data on steatosis in subjects with HIV have been limited to patients coinfected with HCV and found a high proportion (40–75%) with steatosis (2533) that is greater than expected from the general population. Several independent factors have been associated with steatosis in coinfected patients including Caucasian race (25), increased body mass index (25, 2730), glucose intolerance (25; 29), use of DDII or D4T (25; 31), increased lipids (32; 33), and HCV genotype 3 (2731; 33). However, a recent meta-analysis comparison found no significant difference (OR 1.61; 95% CI 0.84–3.10) in steatosis between coinfected patients (n=489) compared to those with HCV alone (n=1540) (34). Similar to studies in NAFLD (24), they identified increased BMI (OR1.13; 95% CI 1.07–1.19) and DM (OR 2.32; 95% CI 1.32–4.07) as factors associated with steatosis. Therefore, although certain HIV factors, such as DDI or D4T can be associated with steatosis, most studies identified factors commonly associated with the metabolic syndrome in all patients with steatosis, irrespective of HIV. Furthermore, most studies did not assess the impact of prior alcohol use.

Data on steatosis in HIV-infected patients without HCV are limited (35). In a study using ultrasound, Crum-Cainflone and colleagues observed that 31% of 216 HIV patients without HCV or HBV coinfection had steatosis (13). Similar to coinfection studies, they identified increased waist, triglycerides, low HDL, and Caucasian race as factors associated with steatosis. Guaraldi and associates used liver-spleen attenuation on computed tomography in 225 HIV subjects attending a metabolic clinic without viral hepatitis or excess alcohol use and found steatosis in 37% (14). In this study, steatosis was associated with higher liver enzymes, male gender, increased waist circumference, and longer exposure to NRTIs. There are few histologic data in HIV infected patients without HCV coinfection. Ingiliz studied 30 French HIV patients with increased ALT in the absence of alcohol abuse, HCV or HBV coinfection, or other known liver disease (15). The majority (22/30) had abnormal liver histology and 18/30 (60%) had steatosis. Of these, steatosis was classified as severe in 9; NASH was diagnosed in 16 (overall prevalence of steatosis: 53%). They also found fibrosis in 18/30, which was severe (bridging fibrosis or cirrhosis) in 6 (20%).

Our results are the first prospective study in North America to define liver histology in this population without viral hepatitis, DM, alcohol use as confounding risks. Similar to Ingiliz (15) we found that the majority (65%) of patients had steatosis with 26% fulfilling histologic criteria for NASH (21;22). We also showed, for the first time, that increased GGT is associated with steatosis and calculated insulin resistance is associated with NASH in this population independently of current HAART use and abdominal fat, a marker of lipodystrophy. Of those with steatosis, hepatocellular ballooning was present in 40% and higher than reported in those with coinfection (29) but similar to studies in NAFLD (24). Similar to the study by Inigiliz (15), 14% in our cohort had significant fibrosis. However, because of small numbers and differences assessment or unrecognized use of alcohol and the demographics of the populations (European vs. North American) makes direct comparisons difficult.

The main strengths of our exploratory study are the prospective design, the careful exclusion of patients with known risk factors for steatosis (diabetes and alcohol use), and blinded histologic review by an experienced histopathologist (EMB) that assessed for not only hepatic steatosis, but for patterns of both lobular and portal inflammation, hepatocellular ballooning, and diagnostic criteria for NASH (21;22) Weaknesses include the small number of patients which limited our power, selection bias of patients referred or willing to undergo biopsy, incomplete records on past HAART use, sampling error inherent in all biopsy-based studies, the possibility of underreported alcohol use, and lack of a HIV negative control group. Furthermore, if lower cut offs for liver enzymes were used (30 U/L for men and 19 U/L for women), our results may have differed. Therefore, our results may not translate to the general population of HIV-infected patients, including those with normal liver enzymes or those not on HAART. Nevertheless, our results support the high prevalence of steatosis and NASH in HIV infected patients with elevated liver enzymes in absence of viral coinfection and its association with insulin resistance. This observation is important because as HIV patients continue to live longer, unrecognized steatohepatitis may become a significant cause of morbidity and mortality similar to that observed in HIV negative subjects (36) and given the established relationship of NAFLD to cardiovascular disease (37), it may explain the prevalence of increased cardiovascular disease in HIV patients (38).

We conclude that steatosis and NASH are common in HIV patients with abnormal liver enzymes who do not have DM, alcohol abuse, viral hepatitis or coinfection. Both are associated with increased GGT and insulin resistance. Further studies are needed in this population to determine the long term clinical significance.

Acknowledgements

I would like to thank the VCU Infectious Disease/HIV Clinic for their support and referral of patients, Dr. Robert Downs who performed and interpreted the DEXA scans, and the General Clinical Research Center Staff who helped in the care of these patients.

Funding: This study was supported by the grants from the National Institutes of Health to RKS (R03 DK075416) and to the General Clinical Research Center of Virginia Commonwealth University (CCTR-UL1RR031990). This study was registered at Clinical Trials.gov (NCT00575757).

Footnotes

Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

Conflict of interest Disclosure: The authors have no financial disclosures related to this work.

Contributions:

Richard Sterling: study concept and design; acquisition of data; analysis and interpretation of data; drafting of the manuscript; critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content; statistical analysis; obtained funding.

Paula Smith: acquisition of data; critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content.

Elizabeth Brunt: analysis and interpretation of data; drafting of the manuscript; critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content.

References

  • 1.Lee LM, Karon JM, Selik R, et al. Survival after AIDS diagnosis in adolescents and adults during the treatment era, United States 1984–1997. JAMA. 2001;285(10):1308–1315. doi: 10.1001/jama.285.10.1308. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Palella FJ, Jr, Delaney KM, Moorman AC, et al. Declining morbidity and mortality among patients with advanced human immunodeficiency virus infection. HIV Outpatient Study Investigators. N Engl J Med. 1998;338(13):853–860. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199803263381301. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Pol S, Lebray P, Vallet-Pichard A. HIV infection and hepatic enzyme abnormalities: intricacies of the pathogenic mechanisms. Clin Infect Dis. 2004;38(Suppl 2):S65–S72. doi: 10.1086/381499. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Sabin CA. Pitfalls of assessing hepatotoxicity in trials and observational cohorts. Clin Infect Dis. 2004;38(Suppl 2):S56–S64. doi: 10.1086/381448. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Sulkowski MS, Mehta SH, Chaisson RE, et al. Hepatotoxicity associated with protease inhibitor-based antiretroviral regimens with or without concurrent ritonavir. AIDS. 2004;18(17):2277–2284. doi: 10.1097/00002030-200411190-00008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Meraviglia P, Schiavini M, Castagna A, et al. Lopinavir/ritonavir treatment in HIV antiretroviral-experienced patients: evaluation of risk factors for liver enzyme elevation. HIV Med. 2004;5(5):334–343. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-1293.2004.00232.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Kottilil S, Polis MA, Kovacs JA. HIV Infection, hepatitis C infection, and HAART: hard clinical choices. JAMA. 2004;292(2):243–250. doi: 10.1001/jama.292.2.243. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Armstrong GL, Wasley A, Simard EP, et al. The prevalence of hepatitis C virus infection in the United States: 1999–2002. Annals of Internal Medicine. 2006;144:705–714. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-144-10-200605160-00004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Rockstroh JK, Mocroft A, Soriano V, et al. Influence of hepatitis C virus infection on HIV-1 disease progression and response to highly active antiviral therapy. Journal of Infectious Diseases. 2005;192:992–1002. doi: 10.1086/432762. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Puoti M, Torti C, Ripamonti D, et al. Severe hepatotoxicity during combination antiretroviral treatment: incidence, liver histology, and outcome. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2003;32(3):259–267. doi: 10.1097/00126334-200303010-00004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Sulkowski MS, Thomas DL, Chaisson RE, et al. Elevated liver enzymes following initiation of antiretroviral therapy. JAMA. 2000;283(19):2526–2527. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.French AL, Benning L, Anastos K, et al. Longitudinal effect of antiretroviral therapy on markers of hepatic toxicity: impact of hepatitis C coinfection. Clin Infect Dis. 2004;39(3):402–410. doi: 10.1086/422142. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Crum-Cianflone N, Dilay A, Collins G, et al. Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease among HIV-infected persons. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2009 Apr 15;50(5):464–473. doi: 10.1097/QAI.0b013e318198a88a. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Guaraldi G, Squillace N, Stentarelli C, et al. Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease in HIV-infected patients referred to a metabolic clinic: prevalence, characteristics, and predictors. Clin Infect Dis. 2008 Jul 15;47(2):250–257. doi: 10.1086/589294. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Ingiliz P, Valantin MA, Duvivier C, et al. Liver damage underlying unexplained transaminase elevation in human immunodeficiency virus-1 mono-infected patients on antiretroviral therapy. Hepatology. 2009 Feb;49(2):436–442. doi: 10.1002/hep.22665. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Bohn MJ, Babor TF, Kranzler HR. The Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT): validation of a screening instrument for use in medical settings. J Stud Alcohol. 1995;56(4):423–432. doi: 10.15288/jsa.1995.56.423. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Glickman SG, Marn CS, Supiano MA, et al. Validity and reliability of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry for the assessment of abdominal adiposity. J Appl Physiol. 2004;97(2):509–514. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.01234.2003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Paradisi G, Smith L, Burtner C, et al. Dual energy X-ray absorptiometry assessment of fat mass distribution and its association with the insulin resistance syndrome. Diabetes Care. 1999;22(8):1310–1317. doi: 10.2337/diacare.22.8.1310. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults. Executive Summary of The Third Report of The National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, And reatment of High Blood Cholesterol In Adults (Adult Treatment Panel III) JAMA. 2001;285:2486–2497. doi: 10.1001/jama.285.19.2486. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Ishak K, Baptista A, Bianchi L, et al. Histological grading and staging of chronic hepatitis. J Hepatol. 1995;22(6):696–699. doi: 10.1016/0168-8278(95)80226-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Kleiner DE, Brunt EM, Van NM, et al. Design and validation of a histological scoring system for nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Hepatology. 2005;41(6):1313–1321. doi: 10.1002/hep.20701. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Brunt EM, Kleiner DE, Wilson L, et al. for the NASH CRN. The NAS and the Histopathologic Diagnosis of NASH: Distinct Clinicopathologic Meanings. Hepatology. 2011;53:810–820. doi: 10.1002/hep.24127. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Sanyal AJ. NASH: A global health problem. Hepatol Res. 2011 Jul;41(7):670–674. doi: 10.1111/j.1872-034X.2011.00824.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Neuschwander-Tetri BA, Clark JM, Bass NM, et al. NASH Clinical Research Network. Clinical, laboratory and histological associations in adults with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Hepatology. 2010 Sep;52(3):913–924. doi: 10.1002/hep.23784. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Sulkowski MS, Mehta SH, Torbenson M, et al. Hepatic steatosis and antiretroviral drug use among adults coinfected with HIV and hepatitis C virus. AIDS. 2005;19(6):585–592. doi: 10.1097/01.aids.0000163935.99401.25. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Monto A, Dove LM, Bostrom A, et al. Hepatic steatosis in HIV/hepatitis C coinfection: prevalence and significance compared with hepatitis C monoinfection. Hepatology. 2005;42(2):310–316. doi: 10.1002/hep.20805. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Marks KM, Petrovic LM, Talal AH, et al. Histologic findings and clinical characteristics associated with hepatic steatosis in patients coinfected with HIV and hepatitis C virus. Journal of Infectious Diseases. 2005;192:1943–1949. doi: 10.1086/497608. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Bani-Sadr F, Carrat F, Bedossa P, et al. Hepatic steatosis in HIV-HCV coinfected patients: analysis of risk factors. AIDS. 2006;20:525–531. doi: 10.1097/01.aids.0000210606.63138.f5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Sterling RK, Contos MJ, Stravitz RT, et al. Steatohepatitis: Risk factors and impact on disease severity in HIV-HCV coinfection. Hepatology. 2008;47:1118–1127. doi: 10.1002/hep.22134. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Neau D, Winnock M, Castéra L, et al. Groupe d'Epidémiologie Clinique du SIDA en Aquitaine. Prevalence of and factors associated with hepatic steatosis in patients coinfected with hepatitis C virus and HIV: Agence Nationale pour la Recherche contre le SIDA et les hépatites virales CO3 Aquitaine Cohort. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2007 Jun 1;45(2):168–173. doi: 10.1097/QAI.0b013e318042e1db. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.McGovern BH, Ditelberg JS, Taylor LE, et al. Hepatic steatosis is associated with fibrosis, nucleoside analogue use, hepatitis C virus genotype 3 infection in HIV-seropositive patients. Clin Infect Dis. 2006 Aug 1;43(3):365–372. doi: 10.1086/505495. Epub 2006 Jun 22. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Gaslightwala I, Bini EJ. Impact of human immunodeficiency virus infection on the prevalence and severity of steatosis in patients with chronic hepatitis C virus infection. J Hepatol. 2006 Jun;44(6):1026–1032. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2006.02.009. Epub 2006 Mar 13. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Rodríguez-Torres M, Govindarajan S, Solá R, et al. Hepatic steatosis in HIV/HCV co-infected patients: correlates, efficacy and outcomes of anti-HCV therapy: a paired liver biopsy study. J Hepatol. 2008 May;48(5):756–764. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2008.01.015. Epub 2008 Feb 7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Machado MV, Oliveira AG, Cortez-Pinto H. Hepatic steatosis in patients coinfected with human immunodeficiency virus/hepatitis C virus: a meta-analysis of the risk factors. Hepatology. 2010 Jul;52(1):71–78. doi: 10.1002/hep.23619. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Kovari H, Weber R. Influence of antiretroviral therapy on liver disease. Curr Opin HIV AIDS. 2011 Jul;6(4):272–277. doi: 10.1097/COH.0b013e3283473405. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Dunn W, Xu R, Wingard DL, et al. Suspected nonalcoholic fatty liver disease and mortality risk in a population-based cohort study. Am J Gastroenterol. 2008;103:2263–2271. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2008.02034.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Targher G, Arcaro G. Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease and increased risk of cardiovascular disease. Atherosclerosis. 2007;191(2):235–240. doi: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2006.08.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Palella FJ, Jr, Phair JP. Cardiovascular disease in HIV infection. Curr Opin HIV AIDS. 2011 Jul;6(4):266–271. doi: 10.1097/COH.0b013e328347876c. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES