Skip to main content
PMC home page
Journal of Arthropod-Borne Diseases logoLink to Journal of Arthropod-Borne Diseases
. 2012 Dec 31;6(2):90–97.

Evaluation of Essential Oil and its Three Main Active Ingredients of Chinese Chenopodium ambrosioides (Family: Chenopodiaceae) against Blattella germanica

Wei Xiang Zhu 1, Kun Zhao 1, Sha Sha Chu 1, Zhi Long Liu 1,*
PMCID: PMC3547299  PMID: 23378965

Abstract

Background:

The efficacy of essential oil of Chenopodium ambrosioides flowering aerial parts and its three main active ingredients was evaluated against Blattella germanica male adults.

Methods:

Composition of essential oil was determined by GC-MS. Topical application bioassay was used to evaluate contact toxicity of essential oil and three main components. Fumigant toxicity of essential oil and its main components was measured using a sealed space method.

Results:

Twenty-two components were identified in the essential oil and the main components were (Z)-ascaridole (29.7%), isoascaridole (13.0%), ρ-cymene (12.7%) and piperitone (5.0%). The essential oil and (Z)-ascaridole, isoascaridole and ρ-cymene possessed fumigant toxicity against male German cockroaches with LC50 values of 4.13, 0.55, 2.07 and 6.92 mg/L air, respectively. Topical application bioassay showed that all the three compounds were toxic to male German cockroaches and (Z)-ascaridole was the strongest with a LD50 value of 22.02 μg/adult while the crude oil with a LD50 value of 67.46 μg/adult.

Conclusion:

The essential oil from Chinese C. ambrosioides and its three main active ingredients may be explored as natural potential insecticides in the control of cockroaches.

Keywords: Blattella germanica, Chenopodium ambrosioides, Essential oil, Fumigant, Contact toxicity

Introduction

German cockroach, Blattella germanica (L) is an important pest of homes, restaurants, and commercial food processing facilities worldwide. They are a major public health concern in hospitals, kitchens, and food manufacturing plants because they are able to carry a variety of bacteria and other pathogenic organisms. They are the mechanical vectors to a few pathogens that can cause disease such as food poisoning, typhoid, pneumonia and asthma (Brenner 1995). Body parts, cast skins, and feces of cockroaches are human allergens, 2nd in importance only to the house dust mites. Currently, control of cockroach populations primarily depends on continued applications of residual insecticides, such as propoxur, acephate, dimethyl 2, 2-dichlorovinyl phosphate (dichlorvos, DDVP), and pyrethroids and stomach poisons, such as hydramethylnon and sulfluramid. However, the repeated application of these insecticides may possess undesirable side effects, such as the disruption of natural biological control systems, and the development of resistance (Chang and Ahn 2001). There are also serious concerns about human health. These problems have highlighted the need for the development of new types of selective cockroach-control alternatives.

There has been growing interest in the use of plant oils for protection of agricultural products and control of public health insects because they are often of low mammalian toxicity, readily biodegradable and pose low danger to the environment if used in small amounts (Rajendran and Srianjini, 2008). During our screening program for new agrochemicals from Chinese medicinal herbs, Chenopodium ambrosioides L (Family: Che- nopodiaceae) was found to possess strong insecticidal activity against German cockroaches (Fig. 1). Chenopodium ambrosioides is an aromatic herb that grows in Central and South America and now distributed throughout the tropical parts of the world (Duke et al. 2002). It has also been employed by empirical herbalists and healers against intestinal parasites (especially small tapeworms and round worms) throughout Latin America, as well as in the West Indies (Quinlan et al. 2002). The plant is also distributed in the southern provinces of China. The aerial parts of this plant have been used as condiment, traditional purgative for intestinal worms and acesodyne and in the Chinese traditional medicine. This herb can expel wind, treat rheumatism (Jiangsu New Medical College 1977). Essential oil of C. ambrosioides has been shown to possess insecticidal and repellent activities against several stored product insects (Su 1991, Tapondjou et al. 2002) and medical important insect pests (Toloza et al. 2006, Gillij et al. 2008).

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Open in a new tab

Flowering Chenopodium ambrosioides (Orginal)

In the present study, insecticidal activity C. ambrosioides essential oil and three main active ingredients against the German cockroaches were investigated.

Materials and Methods

Test insects

Male adults (5–10 days old) were collected from a synchronously reared laboratory colony of insecticide-susceptible German cockroaches. Cockroaches were supplied ad libitum with Purina No 5012 Rat Chow (Laboratory Animal Centre, Chinese Academy of Medicinal Sciences, Beijing 100021), and water was provided in glass tubes with cotton stoppers. All colonies were kept in plastic tanks at room temperature.

Plants

Fresh aerial parts (15 kg of leaves, stems and flowers) of C. ambrosioides were harvested in August 2008 from Fuzhou (26.08° North latitude and 119.28° East longitude), Fujian Province (Fuzhou 350013), PR China. The aerial parts were air-dried for one week and ground to a powder. The species was identified and the voucher specimens (CMH-TuJingJie-FuJian-2008-08) were deposited at the Department of Entomology, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100094.

Extraction of essential oil

The ground powder of C. ambrosioides aerial parts was subjected to hydrodistillation using a modified Clevenger-type apparatus (XWD-C-1000, Shanghai XinWangDe Laboratory Equipment Co, China) for 6 h and extracted with n-hexane. Anhydrous sodium sulphate was used to remove water after extraction. Essential oil was stored in an airtight container in a refrigerator at 4 °C.

Gas chromatography and mass spectrometry

Gas chromatographic analysis was performed on the Agilent 6890N while the essential oil was identified on a mass spectrometer Agilent Technologies 5973N. They were equipped with a flame ionization detector and capillary column with HP-5MS (30m× 0.25mm× 0.25μm). The GC settings were as follows: the initial oven temperature was held at 60 °C for 1 min and ramped at 10 °C min−1 to 180 °C for 1 min, and then ramped at 20 °C min−1 to 280 °C for 15 min. The injector temperature was maintained at 270 °C. The samples (1 μl) were injected neat, with a split ratio of 1: 10. The carrier gas was helium at flow rate of 1.0 ml min−1. Spectra were scanned from 20 to 550 m/z at 2 scans s−1. Most constituents were identified by gas chromatography by comparison of their retention indices with those of the literature or with those of authentic compounds available in our laboratories. The retention indices were determined in relation to a homologous series of n-alkanes (C8–C24) under the same operating conditions. Further identification was made by comparison of their mass spectra on both columns with those stored in NIST 05 and Wiley 275 libraries or with mass spectra from literature (Adams 2001). Component relative percentages were calculated based on GC peak areas without using correction factors.

(Z)-Ascaridole and isoascaridole were isolated by using bioassay-directed fractionation on repeated silica column from the essential oil of C. ambrosioides and confirmed by MS, 1H-NMR and 13C-HNM data. ρ-Cymene (98%) was purchased from Aladdin Reagent (China) Co., Ltd, Shanghai 201206, PRChina. Positive control, pyrethrum extract (25% pyrethrine I and pyrethrine II) was purchased from Fluka Chemie.

Fumigant toxicity

A serial dilution of C. ambrosioides essential oil (20–1.3%, 5 concentrations) and pure compounds (2.5–0.3% for (Z)-ascaridole, 20–0.6% for another two compounds, 5 concentrations) was prepared in n-hexane. A Whatman filter paper (diameter 6.0 cm) were each impregnated with 50 μl dilution, and then placed on the underside of the screw cap of a glass vial (diameter 7.2 cm, height 19.0 cm, volume 750 ml). The solvent was allowed to evaporate for 30 s before the cap was placed tightly on the glass vial, each of which contained 10 male cockroaches inside to form a sealed chamber. Fluon (ICI America Inc) was used inside glass vial to prevent insects from contacting the treated filter paper. Preliminary experiments demonstrated that 30 s were sufficient for the evaporation of solvents. n- Hexane was used as controls. Five replicates were carried out for all treatments and controls, and they were incubated at 24–26 °C, 75% RH, 12:12 LD photoperiod for 24 h and then mortality was recorded. Mortality was defined as inability to move when placed on the dorsal side and inability to respond to prodding. Results from all replicates were subjected to probit analysis using the PriProbit Program V1.6.3 to determine LC50 values (Sakuma 1998).

Topical application bioassay

Groups of ten adult male cockroaches were anaesthetized with carbon dioxide for 15 seconds before treatment. A serial dilution of the essential oil (7.0–1.3%, 5 concentrations) and pure compounds (10–0.6%, 6 concentrations) was prepared in acetone. Aliquots of 2 μl of the solution were dispensed from an Arnold Automatic Micro-applicator (Burkard, Ricksmanworth, England) and applied to the dorsal thorax of individual insects. Controls were determined using acetone. Both treated and control cockroaches were then transferred to glass vials (10 insects/ vial) and kept in incubators (24–26 °C, 75% RH, 12:12 LD photoperiod). Mortality of cockroaches was observed at 24 h post-treatment. Five replicates were carried out for all treatments and controls. Results from all replicates were subjected to probit analysis using the PriProbit Program V1.6.3 to determine LD50 values (Sakuma 1998).

Results

The results of GC-MS of C. ambrosioides essential oil are presented in Table 1. A total of 22 active ingredients were identified in the essential oil, accounting for 88.6% of the total oil (Table 1). The main components were (Z)-ascaridole (29.7%), isoascaridole (13.0%), and ρ-cymene (12.7%) followed by piperitone (5.0%), isothymol (4.9%), and 3, 4-epoxy-ρ-menthan-2-one (4.1%).

Table 1.

Chemical constituents of essential oil derived from Chenopodium ambrosioides

Compound RI* Chemical Formula Relative Area (%)
α-Pinene 931 C10 H16 1.3
β-Pinene 981 C10 H16 0.3
δ-4-Carene 1002 C10 H16 1.9
α-Terpinene 1017 C10 H16 1.1
ρ-Cymene 1024 C10 H14 12.7
ρ,α-Dimenthylstyrene 1118 C10 H12 0.7
trans-ρ-Mentha-2,8-dienol 1126 C11 H18 O2 0.6
trans-ρ-2,8-Menthadien-1-ol 1139 C10 H16 O 0.6
2-Ethylcyclohexanone 1158 C8 H14 O 0.9
α,α-4-Trimethylbenzyl alcohol 1182 C10 H14 O 2.8
cis-Piperitol 1196 C10 H16 0.5
(Z)-Ascaridole 1245 C10 H16 O2 29.7
Piperitone 1250 C10 H16 5.0
3,4-Epoxy-ρ-menthan-2-one 1276 C10 H16 O2 4.1
Thymol 1292 C10 H14 O 1.1
Carvacrol 1298 C10 H14 O 4.9
Isoascaridole 1295 C10 H16 O2 13.0
Precocene II 1368 C13 H16 O3 1.5
Caryophyllene oxide 1584 C15H24O 2.2
Geranyl tiglate 1700 C15 H24 0.8
Hexahydrofarnesyl acetone 1842 C18 H36 O 1.7
Phytol 2119 C20 H40 O 1.2
Total 88.6
Open in a new tab
*

RI, retention index as determined on a HP-5MS column using the homologous series of n-hydrocarbons;

(Z)-Ascaridole, isoascaridole and ρ-cymene possessed fumigant toxicity against male German cockroaches with LC50 values of 0.55, 2.07 and 6.92 mg/L air, respectively while the crude essential oil with a LC50 value of 4.13 mg/L air (Table 2). (Z)-Ascaridole also showed the strongest contact toxicity to German cockroaches with a LD50 value of 22.02 μg/adult (based on the LD50 values, with no overlap in 95% fiducial limits) by using topical application bioassay while the crude essential oil with a LD50 value of 64.47 μg/adult (Table 3). Isoascaridole and ρ-cymene also had weak contact toxicity against German cockroaches with LD50 values of 96.28 and 119.90 μg/adult, respectively.

Table 2.

Fumigant toxicity of essential oil and components from Chenopodium ambrosioides against male cockroach adults

Compounds LC50 (mg/L air) 95% fiducial limits Slope±SE Chi square (χ2)
Ascaridole 0.55 0.47–0.63 7.25±0.69 10.15
ρ-Cymene 6.92 6.11–7.85 7.06±0.45 8.23
Isoascaridole 2.07 1.78–2.43 6.17±0.49 9.46
Crude oil 4.13 3.62–4.74 5.06±0.40 11.21
DDVP 0.01* - - -
Open in a new tab
*

Data from Jang et al. (2005)

Table 3.

Contact toxicity of essential oil and components from Chenopodium ambrosioides against male cockroach adults

Compounds LD50 (μg/adult) 95% fiducial limits Slope±SE Chi square (χ2)
Ascaridole 22.02 19.92–24.43 6.12±0.73 9.48
ρ-Cymene 119.90 102.13–143.51 5.23±0.47 13.40
Isoascaridole 96.28 78.04–117.93 3.44±0.35 14.67
Crude oil 64.47 59.21–70.46 4.09±0.43 7.40
Pyrethrum extract 1.70 1.16–3.78 4.23±0.47 6.80
Open in a new tab

Discussion

Among the three isolated compounds, (Z)-ascaridole was proved to be the most active (fumigant) compound because it showed 7 times more toxic to the German cockroaches compared with the crude essential oil (Table 2). Isoascaridole also demonstrated stronger fumigant toxicity against German cockroaches than the crude essential oil (based on the LC50 values, with no overlap in 95% fiducial limits). However, ρ-cymene had less toxic to German cockroaches than the crude essential oil. In the previous report (Jang et al. 2005), 41 naturally occurring monoterpenoids was evaluated for fumigant toxicity against German cockroaches and verbenone was most toxic to the German cockroaches with a LD50 value of 11.5 mg/L air. In the present study, (Z)-ascaridole was 20 times more toxic to the German cockroaches compared to verbenone. However, fumigant toxicity bioassay demonstrated that all the three isolated compounds and the crude essential oil were less toxic to the cockroaches compared to the commercial insecticide, DDVP because of DDVP with a LC50 value of 0.007 mg/L air.

The three isolated compounds exhibited contact toxicity against the German cockroaches (Table 3). However, compared with the control (pyrethrum extracts, LD50= 1.70 μg/adult), all the three compounds and the essential oil showed less toxic to the German cockroaches in the topical application bioassay. The above findings suggested that the C. ambrosioides essential oil and the three components especially (Z)-ascaridole may possess potential to be developed as novel natural insecticides, especially fumigants in the control of cockroaches.

In the previous studies, several essential oils have been evaluated and demonstrated to possess insecticidal, antiffedant, and repellent activities against cockroaches, such as mint oil (Appel et al. 2001), catnip essential oil (Peterson et al. 2002), majoram oil (Jang et al. 2005), garlic and thyme oil (Tunaz et al. 2009), citrus oils (Yoon et al. 2009), and essential oils derived from star anise Illicium verum (Chang and Ahn 2001), American peppertree Schinus molle (Ferrero et al. 2007), and nutmeg Myristic1a fragrans (Jung et al. 2007). Moreover, naturally occurring monoterpenoids, components of essential oils were also evaluated for insecticidal and repellent activities against cockroaches (Ngoh et al. 1998, Jang et al. 2005) and cineole, l-fenchone, limonene, linalool, menthone, pulegone, and thujone at 50 μg/ml air (14 h exposure) caused 100% mortality of male adult German cockroaches (Lee et al. 2003).

The aerial parts of this plant have been used as traditional purgative for intestinal worms in Chinese medicine (Jiangsu New Medical College 1977). However, the essential oil of C. ambrosioides is an irritant to the mucous membrane of the gastrointestinal tract, kidney and liver (Gadano et al. 2006). Overdoses of this oil have caused death in men and rats (Monzote et al. 2006). Intake of 10 mg/kg of the oil has been known to cause cardiac disturbances, convulsions, respiratory disturbances, sleepiness, vomiting and weakness and even death. Moreover, ascaridole is toxic and has a pungent, not very pleasant flavor; in pure form, it is an explosive sensitive to shock (Potawale et al. 2008). For the practical use of ascaridole and the crude essential oil as novel natural fumigants/ insecticides, further studies are necessary on the safety of these materials to human, and on the development of formulations to improve efficacy and stability, and to cut cost as well.

The main constituents of the essential oil were (Z)-ascaridole, isoascaridole, ρ-cymene and piperitone (Table1). However, there were great variations in chemical composition of the essential oils of C. ambrosioides. For example, α-terpinyl acetate (73.9%) and ρ-cymene are major constituents of C. ambrosioides essential oil from Mexico and content of ascaridole is only 2% (Pino et al. 2003). In another report, limonene (32.5%), trans-pinocarveol (26.7%) and geranial (5.0%) were main components of C. ambrosioides essential oil from Mexico (Sagrero-Nieves and Bartley, 1995). The main components of C. ambrosioides essential oil derived from Brazil were (Z)-ascaridole (61.4%) and (E)-ascaridole (18.6%) (Jardim et al. 2008). However, the C. ambrosioides essential oil from Nigeria contained α-terpinene (56.0%), α-terpinyl acetate (15.7%) and ρ-cymene (15.5%) and no ascaridole was detected in the oil (Muhayimana et al. 1998). The essential oil from India contained α-terpinene (47.4%), ρ-cymene (25.8%) and ascaridole (14.8%) (Singh et al. 2008). However, (Z)-ascaridole (29.7%), isoascaridole (13.0%), and ρ-cymene (12.7%) are the three main components of the essential oil from the Chinese C. ambrosioides (Table 1).

For the practical use of the crude essential oil of Chinese C. ambrosioides as a new natural insecticide, standardization of the essential oil is needed.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Open in a new tab

GC-MC graph of Chenopodium ambrosioides essential oil profiles

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to Dr QR Liu, College of Life Sciences, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China, for identification of Chinese medicinal herb. This work was funded by the Hi-Tech Research and Development of China 2011AA10A202 and 2006 AA10A209. The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests.

References

  1. Adams RP. Identification of Essential Oil Components by Gas Chromatography/Quadrupole Mass Spectroscopy. Allured; Carol Stream, IL: 2001. [Google Scholar]
  2. Appel AG, Gehret MJ, Tanley MJ. Repellency and toxicity of mint oil to American and German cockroaches (Dictyoptera: Blattidae and Blattellidae) J Agric Urban Entomol. 2001;18:149–156. [Google Scholar]
  3. Brenner RJ. Economics and medical importance of German cockroaches. In: Rust MK, Owens JM, Reierson DA, editors. Understanding and controlling the German cockroach. Oxford University Press; New York: 1995. pp. 77–92. [Google Scholar]
  4. Chang KS, Ahn YJ. Fumigant activity of (E)-anethole identified in Illicium verum fruit against Blattella germanica. Pest Manag Sci. 2001;58:161–166. doi: 10.1002/ps.435. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Cloyd RA, Chiasson H. Activity of an essential oil derived from Chenopodium ambrosioides on greenhouse insect pests. J Econ Entomol. 2007;100:459–466. doi: 10.1603/0022-0493(2007)100[459:AOAEOD]2.0.CO;2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Duke J, Bogenshutz M, du-Cellier J, Duke A. Handbook of Medicinal Herbs. 2nd ed. CRC Press; Florida: 2002. [Google Scholar]
  7. Ferrero AA, Chopa CJ, Gonzalez JOW, Alzogaray RA. Repellence and toxicity of Schinus molle extracts on Blattella germanica. Fitoterapia. 2007;78:311–314. doi: 10.1016/j.fitote.2006.11.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Gadano AB, Gurni AA, Carballo MA. Argentine folk medicine: genotoxic effects of Chenopodiaceae family. J Ethnopharmacol. 2006;103:246–251. doi: 10.1016/j.jep.2005.08.043. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Gillij YG, Gleiser RM, Zygadlo JA. Mosquito repellent activity of essential oils of aromatic plants growing in Argentina. Bioresour Technol. 2008;99:2507–2515. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2007.04.066. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Jang YS, Yang YC, Choi DS, Ahn YJ. Vapor phase toxicity of marjoram oil compounds and their related monoterpenoids to Blattella germanica (Orthoptera: Blattellidae) J Agric Food Chem. 2005;53:7892–7898. doi: 10.1021/jf051127g. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Jardim CM, Jham GN, Dhingra OD, Freire MM. Composition and antifungal activity of the essential oil of the Brazilian Chenopodium ambrosioides L. J Chem Ecol. 2008;34:1213–1218. doi: 10.1007/s10886-008-9526-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Jiangsu New Medical College . Encyclopedia of Chinese Medicinal Substances. Shanghai People’s Publisher; Shanghai: 1977. [Google Scholar]
  13. Jung WC, Jang YS, Hieu TT, Lee CK, Ahn YJ. Toxicity of Myristica fragrans seed compounds against Blattella germanica (Dictyoptera: Blattellidae) J Med Entomol. 2007;44:524–529. doi: 10.1603/0022-2585(2007)44[524:tomfsc]2.0.co;2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Lee S, Peterson CJ, Coats JR. Fumigation toxicity of monoterpenoids to several stored product insects. J Stored Prod Res. 2003;39:77–85. [Google Scholar]
  15. Monzote L, Montalvo AM, Almanonni S, Scull R, Miranda M, Abreu J. Activity of the essential oil from Chenopodium ambrosioides grown in Cuba against Leishmania amazonensis. Chemotherapy. 2006;52:130–136. doi: 10.1159/000092858. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Muhayimana A, Chalchat JC, Garry RP. Chemical composition of essential oils of Chenopodium ambrosioides L. from Rwanda. J Essent Oil Res. 1998;10:690–692. [Google Scholar]
  17. Ngoh SP, Choo LEW, Pang FY, Huang Y, Kini MR, Ho SH. Insecticidal and repellent properties of nine volatile constituents of essential oils against the American cockroaches, Periplaneta americana (L.) Pestic Sci. 1998;54:261–268. [Google Scholar]
  18. Peterson CJ, Nemetz LT, Jones LM, Coats JR. Behavioral activity of catnip (Lamiaceae) essential oil components to the German cockroach (Blattodae: Blattellidae) J Econ Entomol. 2002;95:377–380. doi: 10.1603/0022-0493-95.2.377. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Pino JA, Marbot R, Real IM. Essential oil of Chenopodium ambrosioides L. from Cuba. J Essent Oil Res. 2003;15:213–214. [Google Scholar]
  20. Potawale SE, Luniya KP, Mantri RA, Mehta UK, Sadiq MD, Waseem MD, Vetal YD, Deshmukh RS. Chenopodium ambrosioides: an ethnopharmacological review. Pharmacologyonline. 2008;2:272–286. [Google Scholar]
  21. Quinlan MB, Quinlan RJ, Nolan JM. Ethnophysiology and herbal treatments of intestinal worms in Dominica, West Indies. J Ethnopharmacol. 2002;80:75–83. doi: 10.1016/s0378-8741(02)00002-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Rajendran S, Srianjini V. Plant products as fumigants for stored-product insects control. J Stored Prod Res. 2008;44:126–135. [Google Scholar]
  23. Sagrero-Nieves L, Bartley JP. Volatile constituents from the leaves of Chenopodium ambrosioides L. J Essent Oil Res. 1995;7:221–223. [Google Scholar]
  24. Sakuma M. Probit analysis of preference data. Appl Entomol Zool. 1998;33:339–347. [Google Scholar]
  25. Singh HP, Batish DR, Kohli RK, Mittal S, Yadav S. Chemical composition of essential oil from leaves of Chenopodium ambrosioides from Chandigarh, India. Chem Nat Compd. 2008;44:378–379. [Google Scholar]
  26. Su HCF. Toxicity and repellency of Chenopodium oil to four species of stored-product insects. J Entomol Sci. 1991;26:178–182. [Google Scholar]
  27. Tapondjou LA, Adler C, Bouda H, Fontem DA. Efficacy of powder and essential oil from Chenopodium ambrosioides leaves as post-harvest grain protectants against six stored product beetles. J Stored Prod Res. 2002;38:395–402. [Google Scholar]
  28. Toloza AC, Zygadlo J, Cueto GM, Biurrun F, Zerba E, Picollo MI. Fumigant and repellent properties of essential oils and component compounds against permethrin-resistant Pediculus humanus capitis (Anoplura: Pediculidae) from Argentina. J Med Entomol. 2006;43:889–895. doi: 10.1603/0022-2585(2006)43[889:farpoe]2.0.co;2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Tunaz H, Er MK, Isikber AA. Fumigant toxicity of plant essential oils and selected monoterpenoid components against the adult German cockroach, Blattella germanica (L.) (Dictyoptera: Blattellidae) Turk J Agric For. 2009;33:211–217. [Google Scholar]
  30. Yoon C, Kang SH, Yang JO, Noh DJ, Indiragandhi P, Kim GH. Repellent activity of citrus oils against the cockroaches Blattella germanica, Periplaneta americana and P. fuliginosa. J Pestic Sci. 2009;34:77–88. [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Arthropod-Borne Diseases are provided here courtesy of Tehran University of Medical Sciences

RESOURCES