Skip to main content
Plant Signaling & Behavior logoLink to Plant Signaling & Behavior
. 2012 Nov 1;7(11):1447–1449. doi: 10.4161/psb.21779

Signaling role of oligogalacturonides derived during cell wall degradation

José G Vallarino 1, Sonia Osorio 1,2,*
PMCID: PMC3548869  PMID: 22918501

Abstract

In addition to the role of the cell wall as a physical barrier against pathogens, some of its constituents, such as pectin-derived oligogalacturonides (OGAs) are essential components to trigger signaling pathways that induce rapid defense responses. Many pathogens directly penetrate the cell wall to access water and nutrients of the plant protoplast, and a rigid cell wall can fend off pathogen attack by forming an impenetrable physical barrier. Thus, cell wall integrity sensing is one mechanism by which plants may detect pathogen attack. Moreover, when the plant-pathogen interaction occurred, OGAs released during cell wall modification can trigger plant defense (e.g., production of reactive oxygen species, production of anti-microbial metabolites and synthesis of pathogenesis-related proteins). This review documents and discusses studies suggesting that OGAs play a dual signaling role during pathogen attack by inducing defense responses and plant architecture adjustment.

Keywords: cell wall, defense, elicitors, oligogalacturonides, auxin

Text

The capacity of plants to survive adverse conditions and reach reproductive maturity critically depends on their ability to continuously adapt to changes in the environment. In particular, a plant attacked by a pathogen can resist infection by activating its own defense strategies in a timely manner.

For definition, an optimal immune system for long-lived organisms requires high specificity, self-tolerance and immune memory. The immune system in animal is the most studied and most sophisticated. By comparison, the immune system of plants seems to be far less complex. Because plants lack an adaptive immune system, it immune system is called “innate immune system.” The innate immune system is an ancient, robust and broad-spectrum defense system that protects plants against invading microbes.1,2

Plant Cell Wall Elicitors

The plant cell wall is a complex extracellular structure that plays an important roles in plant growth and development.3 The plant cell wall is composed for a complex network of polysaccharides, cellulose, hemicellulose and pectin.4 The main load-bearing component of the wall is cellulose that is composed by fibers of 30–36 chains of β-1,4-linked glucose. These fibers are interconnected with hemicellulose polymer (xyloglucan or arabinoxylan) and both polymers are embedded in the matrix of pectin [a mixture of complex polysaccharides, of which the main component is polygalacturonic acid, a homopolymer of [1→4]-α-D-galacturonic acid (GalA) units].5

All plant pathogens interact with plant cell wall as initial obstacle. Plant cell wall provides a physical barrier and also highly dynamic structure that is remodeled after pathogen attack.6 Pathogens by mechanical force and/or producing enzymes capable of degrading the plant cell wall, directly penetrate the cell wall to access water and cellular nutrients.7,8 After pathogen attack, plants deposit callose (glucan polymers) rich cell wall appositions at sites of attempted pathogen penetration, accumulate phenolic compounds and synthesize lignin polymers to reinforce the wall9 following the activation of host defense pathways. The first active line of defense occurs at the plant cell surface when pathogens-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs), such as structural components of the pathogen cell wall (chitin, glucan) and bacterial flagellins, are detected by pattern-recognition receptors (PRRs).10

Moreover, during plant-pathogen interaction, plant cell wall breakdown fragments have been shown to elicit various defense responses. For instance, degradation of cellulose by β-1,4-glucanases generates cellodextrin and degradation of the homogalacturonic domain of pectin generates [1→4]-α-linked oligologalacturonides (OGAs).6,11-13 This defense response include reinforce the protection provided by plant cell wall, generation and accumulation of reactive oxygen species (ROS), production of antimicrobial compounds such as phytoalexins and synthesis of pathogenesis-related proteins (PR).2

OGAs are the best-characterized plant cell wall derived elicitors. However, not all OGAs are capable of eliciting a defense response. Their ability to elicit a response depends on length [degree of polymerization (dp) higher than 9],13-17 degree of methyl esterification18-21 and level of acetylation.22

Treatment of plants with exogenous OGAs showed to initiate the production of ROS and the accumulation of transcripts such as phenylalanine ammonia-lyase gene (PAL), which is the first enzyme in the phenylpropanoid pathway leading to phytoalexins and lignin production6,23 as well as changes in gene expression in the salicylic acid (SA), ethylene (ET) and jasmonic acid (JA) pathways.18,24,25 In grapevine, treatment with OGAs showed to accumulate hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) and an increase in PAL and various PR genes.14,24 In Arabidopsis, OGAs induced the expression of several defense genes, including PAD3, which encodes the cytochrome P450 (CYP71B15) enzyme that catalyzes the last step in camalexin biosynthesis.16 In wild strawberry, external addition of OGAs produced an accumulation of SA as well as an increase expression of a pathogenesis-related gene, PR5.18

Signaling Through Cell Wall Damage

Recently, analyses of several mutants highlighted the importance of cell wall modification in the plant–pathogen interaction. The pmr6 mutant, with a mutation in a pectate lyase-like gene,26 and the pmr5 mutant, with a mutation in a gene of unknown function,27 exhibited resistance to some powdery mildew species. Both mutants exhibited a strong increase in total uronic acid content, suggesting that PMR5 and PMR6 affect pectin composition. The penetration success of the power mildew pathogen on these two mutants resembles wild type suggesting that a change in cell wall digestibility by this pathogen was not responsible for the disease resistance phenotype. Therefore, it is possible that the changed cell wall or altered pectin fragments released during fungal attack stimulate plant defenses in both mutants.28 Other study in fruits of the wild strawberry overexpressing FaPE1, a fruit-specific pectin methyl esterase gene (PME) from the cultivated strawberry showed a pectin modification.18 These transgenic fruits inoculated with spores of Botrytis cinerea were more resistant to the growth this pathogen. Moreover, it was demonstrated that this was due to the presence of partially de-methylated OGAs in the transgenic fruits, which had constitutively activated the salicylic acid signaling pathway. It is achievable that these de-methylated OGAs were released because the pectin was modified.

The Arabidopsis mutant cev1, identified by its enhanced resistance to powdery mildew, is mutated in CESA3, which encodes a cellulose synthase, and its resistance was attributed to constitutive activation of the jasmonate-signaling pathway, presumably due to a decrease in the amount of cellulose.29,30 Additionally, mur3 mutants, which are affected in a xyloglucan galactosyltransferase, showed an increase in the levels of SA in their petioles and were resistant to Hyaloperonospora parasitica.31

How is the cell damage detected by the plants? Nowadays, it is not fully understood. The cell damage maybe sensed by the detection of damage to polysaccharides, inhibition of cell wall synthesis or assembly, release of OGAs and other degraded cell wall fragments. Recently, the Arabidopsis wall-associated kinase1 (WAK1) has been described as a receptors of OGAs.32 Also a receptor-like kinase (RLK) has been identified that mediate responses to cellulose deficiency which suggests the CrRLK1L protein family as a new candidate for cell wall integrity sensors.33

Involvement of Auxin in Plant Responses to OGAs

It is very well known that signaling for defense is interconnected with hormones pathways. ET, JA and SA pathways are clearly components of signal transduction to resistance, however, other hormones such as auxin have more complex network with defense signaling.34

Besides inducing defense responses, OGAs can also affect several aspects of plant growth and development. In particular, a number of studies have been reported to have an antagonistic role to auxin. From our knowledge, the first evidence of this antagonistic role between auxin and OGAs was shown in pea stem segments in which auxin-induced growth was competitively inhibited by elicitor-active OGAs.35 Therefore, the capacity of OGAs to antagonize auxin may play an important role during development. Indeed, OGAs were shown regulate several developmental related processes such as root growth and alteration in lateral root formation,36,37 adventitious root formation38,39 and pericycle cell differentiation.40 Furthermore, in tobacco, OGAs inhibited the induction of the late auxin-responsive genes Nt114, rolB and rolD.41 In cucumber seedling, OGAs treatment allowed more rapid recovery of root growth in auxin-treated roots.42 The role of OGAs in wild strawberry development was revealed by larger size of ripe fruits.43 It would be important to know whether or not OGAs and auxin act independently or of there is an interaction between their signaling pathways. To date, the mechanism underlying the antagonistic effect of OGAs and auxin-induced responses has not been described yet.

Conclusions

Plant cell walls are highly complex in structure and in composition. Why are they so complex? In 1978, it was suggested that some of the structural complexity could represent latent signal molecules involved in defense rather that structures required for the mechanical function of the wall.44 Nowadays, it is known that the induction of defense pathways by plant cell wall damage supports the role of cell wall not only a physical barrier between pathogens and the internal contents of plant cells but also as an important sensor for downstream signaling pathways. Some progresses have been made with recent analyses of plant mutants and transgenics of plant responses to cell wall damage. However, much remains to be discovered about identification of more plant cell wall derived elicitors as well as its receptors and how the plant cell wall signals is traduced to induce the defense responses and others changes in plant growth and development.

Acknowledgments

We thank Alisdair R. Fernie (Max-Planck-Institut für Molekulare Pflanzenphysiologie, Potsdam-Golm) and Victoriano Valpuesta (Departamento de Biología Molecular y Bioquímica, Universidad de Málaga) for their helpful discussions and support.

Footnotes

References

  • 1.Janeway CA, Jr., Medzhitov R. Innate immune recognition. Annu Rev Immunol. 2002;20:197–216. doi: 10.1146/annurev.immunol.20.083001.084359. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Nürnberger T, Brunner F, Kemmerling B, Piater L. Innate immunity in plants and animals: striking similarities and obvious differences. Immunol Rev. 2004;198:249–66. doi: 10.1111/j.0105-2896.2004.0119.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Humphrey TV, Bonetta DT, Goring DR. Sentinels at the wall: cell wall receptors and sensors. New Phytol. 2007;176:7–21. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2007.02192.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Cosgrove DJ. Growth of the plant cell wall. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2005;6:850–61. doi: 10.1038/nrm1746. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Carpita NC, Gibeaut DM. Structural models of primary cell walls in flowering plants: consistency of molecular structure with the physical properties of the walls during growth. Plant J. 1993;3:1–30. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.1993.tb00007.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Ridley BL, O’Neill MA, Mohnen D. Pectins: structure, biosynthesis, and oligogalacturonide-related signaling. Phytochemistry. 2001;57:929–67. doi: 10.1016/S0031-9422(01)00113-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Lipka V, Dittgen J, Bednarek P, Bhat R, Wiermer M, Stein M, et al. Pre- and postinvasion defenses both contribute to nonhost resistance in Arabidopsis. Science. 2005;310:1180–3. doi: 10.1126/science.1119409. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Vorwerk S, Somerville S, Somerville C. The role of plant cell wall polysaccharide composition in disease resistance. Trends Plant Sci. 2004;9:203–9. doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2004.02.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Hückelhoven R. Cell wall-associated mechanisms of disease resistance and susceptibility. Annu Rev Phytopathol. 2007;45:101–27. doi: 10.1146/annurev.phyto.45.062806.094325. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Boller T, Felix G. A renaissance of elicitors: perception of microbe-associated molecular patterns and danger signals by pattern-recognition receptors. Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2009;60:379–406. doi: 10.1146/annurev.arplant.57.032905.105346. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.De Lorenzo G, D’Ovidio R, Cervone F. The role of polygalacturonase-inhibiting proteins (PGIPs) in defense against pathogenic fungi. Annu Rev Phytopathol. 2001;39:313–35. doi: 10.1146/annurev.phyto.39.1.313. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.De Lorenzo G, Ferrari S. Polygalacturonase-inhibiting proteins in defense against phytopathogenic fungi. Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2002;5:295–9. doi: 10.1016/S1369-5266(02)00271-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Côté F, Hahn MG. Oligosaccharins: structures and signal transduction. Plant Mol Biol. 1994;26:1379–411. doi: 10.1007/BF00016481. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Aziz A, Heyraud A, Lambert B. Oligogalacturonide signal transduction, induction of defense-related responses and protection of grapevine against Botrytis cinerea. Planta. 2004;218:767–74. doi: 10.1007/s00425-003-1153-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Darvill A, Augur C, Bergmann C, Carlson RW, Cheong JJ, Eberhard S, et al. Oligosaccharins--oligosaccharides that regulate growth, development and defence responses in plants. Glycobiology. 1992;2:181–98. doi: 10.1093/glycob/2.3.181. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Ferrari S, Galletti R, Denoux C, De Lorenzo G, Ausubel FM, Dewdney J. Resistance to Botrytis cinerea induced in Arabidopsis by elicitors is independent of salicylic acid, ethylene, or jasmonate signaling but requires PHYTOALEXIN DEFICIENT3. Plant Physiol. 2007;144:367–79. doi: 10.1104/pp.107.095596. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Van Cutsem P, Messiaen J. Biological effect of pectin fragments in plant cells. Acta Bot. Neerl. 1994; 43. [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Osorio S, Castillejo C, Quesada MA, Medina-Escobar N, Brownsey GJ, Suau R, et al. Partial demethylation of oligogalacturonides by pectin methyl esterase 1 is required for eliciting defence responses in wild strawberry (Fragaria vesca) Plant J. 2008;54:43–55. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2007.03398.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Jin DF, West CA. Characteristics of galacturonic Acid oligomers as elicitors of casbene synthetase activity in castor bean seedlings. Plant Physiol. 1984;74:989–92. doi: 10.1104/pp.74.4.989. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Navazio L, Moscatiello R, Bellincampi D, Baldan B, Meggio F, Brini M, et al. The role of calcium in oligogalacturonide-activated signalling in soybean cells. Planta. 2002;215:596–605. doi: 10.1007/s00425-002-0776-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Wiethölter N, Graessner B, Mierau M, Mort AJ, Moerschbacher BM. Differences in the methyl ester distribution of homogalacturonans from near-isogenic wheat lines resistant and susceptible to the wheat stem rust fungus. Mol Plant Microbe Interact. 2003;16:945–52. doi: 10.1094/MPMI.2003.16.10.945. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Randoux B, Renard-Merlier D, Mulard G, Rossard S, Duyme F, Sanssené J, et al. Distinct defenses induced in wheat against powdery mildew by acetylated and nonacetylated oligogalacturonides. Phytopathology. 2010;100:1352–63. doi: 10.1094/PHYTO-03-10-0086. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Zhao J, Davis LC, Verpoorte R. Elicitor signal transduction leading to production of plant secondary metabolites. Biotechnol Adv. 2005;23:283–333. doi: 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2005.01.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Aziz A, Gauthier A, Bézier A, Poinssot B, Joubert JM, Pugin A, et al. Elicitor and resistance-inducing activities of beta-1,4 cellodextrins in grapevine, comparison with beta-1,3 glucans and alpha-1,4 oligogalacturonides. J Exp Bot. 2007;58:1463–72. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erm008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Moscatiello R, Mariani P, Sanders D, Maathuis FJ. Transcriptional analysis of calcium-dependent and calcium-independent signalling pathways induced by oligogalacturonides. J Exp Bot. 2006;57:2847–65. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erl043. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Vogel JP, Raab TK, Schiff C, Somerville SC. PMR6, a pectate lyase-like gene required for powdery mildew susceptibility in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell. 2002;14:2095–106. doi: 10.1105/tpc.003509. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Vogel JP, Raab TK, Somerville CR, Somerville SC. Mutations in PMR5 result in powdery mildew resistance and altered cell wall composition. Plant J. 2004;40:968–78. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2004.02264.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Hématy K, Cherk C, Somerville S. Host-pathogen warfare at the plant cell wall. Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2009;12:406–13. doi: 10.1016/j.pbi.2009.06.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Caño-Delgado A, Penfield S, Smith C, Catley M, Bevan M. Reduced cellulose synthesis invokes lignification and defense responses in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J. 2003;34:351–62. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-313X.2003.01729.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Ellis C, Karafyllidis I, Wasternack C, Turner JG. The Arabidopsis mutant cev1 links cell wall signaling to jasmonate and ethylene responses. Plant Cell. 2002;14:1557–66. doi: 10.1105/tpc.002022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Tedman-Jones JD, Lei R, Jay F, Fabro G, Li X, Reiter WD, et al. Characterization of Arabidopsis mur3 mutations that result in constitutive activation of defence in petioles, but not leaves. Plant J. 2008;56:691–703. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2008.03636.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Brutus A, Sicilia F, Macone A, Cervone F, De Lorenzo G. A domain swap approach reveals a role of the plant wall-associated kinase 1 (WAK1) as a receptor of oligogalacturonides. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010;107:9452–7. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1000675107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Hématy K, Sado PE, Van Tuinen A, Rochange S, Desnos T, Balzergue S, et al. A receptor-like kinase mediates the response of Arabidopsis cells to the inhibition of cellulose synthesis. Curr Biol. 2007;17:922–31. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2007.05.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Bari R, Jones JD. Role of plant hormones in plant defence responses. Plant Mol Biol. 2009;69:473–88. doi: 10.1007/s11103-008-9435-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Branca C, De Lorenzo G, Cervone F. Competitive inhibition of the auxin-induced elongation by α-D-oligogalacturonides in pea stem segments. Plant Physiol. 1988;72:499–504. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-3054.1988.tb09157.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Hernandez GM, Sepulveda B, Richards A, Soriano E. The architecture of Phaseolus vulgaris root is altered when a defense response is elicited by an oligogalacturonide. Braz J Plant Physiol. 2006;18:351–5. [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Hernández-Mata G, Mellado-Rojas ME, Richards-Lewis A, López-Bucio J, Beltran-Peña E, Soriano-Bello EL. Plant immunity induced by oligogalacturonides alters root growth in a process involving flavonoi accumulation in Arabidopsis thaliana. J Plant Growth Regul. 2010;29:441–54. doi: 10.1007/s00344-010-9156-x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Bellincampi D, Salvi G, De Lorenzo G, Cervone F, Marfa V, Eberhard S, et al. Oligalacturonides inhibit the formation of roots on tobacco explants. Plant J. 1993;4:207–13. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-313X.1993.04010207.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Savatin DV, Ferrari S, Sicilia F, De Lorenzo G. Oligogalacturonide-auxin antagonism does not require posttranscriptional gene silencing or stabilization of auxin response repressors in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 2011;157:1163–74. doi: 10.1104/pp.111.184663. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Altamura MM, Zaghi D, Salvi G, De Lorenzo G, Bellincampi D. Oligogalacturonides stimulate pericycle cell wall thickening and cell divisions leading to stoma formation in tobacco leaf explants. Planta. 1998;204:429–36. doi: 10.1007/s004250050276. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Mauro ML, De Lorenzo G, Costantino P, Bellincampi D. Oligogalacturonides inhibit the induction of late but not of early auxin-responsive genes in tobacco. Planta. 2002;215:494–501. doi: 10.1007/s00425-002-0772-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Spiro MD, Bowers JF, Cosgrove DJ. A comparison of oligogalacturonide- and auxin-induced extracellular alkalinization and growth responses in roots of intact cucumber seedlings. Plant Physiol. 2002;130:895–903. doi: 10.1104/pp.006064. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Osorio S, Bombarely A, Giavalisco P, Usadel B, Stephens C, Aragüez I, et al. Demethylation of oligogalacturonides by FaPE1 in the fruits of the wild strawberry Fragaria vesca triggers metabolic and transcriptional changes associated with defence and development of the fruit. J Exp Bot. 2011;62:2855–73. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erq465. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Albersheim P, Valent BS. Host-pathogen interactions in plants. Plants, when exposed to oligosaccharides of fungal origin, defend themselves by accumulating antibiotics. J Cell Biol. 1978;78:627–43. doi: 10.1083/jcb.78.3.627. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Plant Signaling & Behavior are provided here courtesy of Taylor & Francis

RESOURCES