Skip to main content
Physiology and Molecular Biology of Plants logoLink to Physiology and Molecular Biology of Plants
. 2009 Oct 28;15(3):281–286. doi: 10.1007/s12298-009-0032-8

Effect of water stress on carbon isotope discrimination and Rubisco activity in bread and durum wheat genotypes

Shailesh Kumar 1,3,, Bhupinder Singh 2
PMCID: PMC3550359  PMID: 23572938

Abstract

Carbon isotope discrimination (CID) has been suggested as an indirect tool for selection of water use efficiency in wheat. This study evaluates the role of Rubisco activity in regulating carbon isotope discrimination (CID) and discriminate the response of durum (PDW-233) and bread (C-306, HD-2329) wheat genotypes for carbon isotope discrimination and Rubisco activity under induced water stress hydroponically created by using different concentrations of PEG. In C-306, a well known drought tolerant genotype, CID was positively correlated with Rubisco activity. In C-306 CID was positively correlated with both Rubisco activity (r = 0.588* at 5). A positive but not a strong correlation was observed between Rubisco activity and CID (r = 0.418) in durum type PDW-233. Although in HD-2329 the Rubisco activity (r = 0.303) was positively correlated with CID, the correlations were not significant. We show that carbon isotope discrimination technique is a potential tool for selection of lines with high Rubisco activity in the wheat breeding program.

Key words: Carbon isotope discrimination, Rubisco activity, water stress, bread wheat, durum wheat

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (90.4 KB).

Abbreviations

CID, Δ

carbon isotope discrimination

%0

parts per thousand

PEG

polyethylene glycol

*

5% significance level

RUBP

Ribulose- 1, 5- bis phosphate

Rubisco

Ribulose -1, 5-bis-phosphate carboxylase/oxygenase

WUE

Water Use Efficiency

References

  1. Cornic G., Briantais J.M. Partitioning photosynthetic electron flow between CO2 and O2 reduction in a C3 leaf (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) at different CO2 concentrations and during drought stress. Plants. 1991;183:178–184. doi: 10.1007/BF00197786. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Couper A., Eley D. Surface tension of polyethylene glycol solutions. J. Polymer. Sci. 1984;3:345–349. [Google Scholar]
  3. Fair P., Tew J., Cresswell C.F. Enzyme activities associated with CO2 exchange in illuminated leaves of Hordeum vulgare, L.I: Effect of light period, leaf age and position on CO2 compensation point. Ann. Bot. 1973;37:831–844. [Google Scholar]
  4. Farquhar G.D., Ehleringer J.R., Hubick K.T.Carbon isotope discrimination and photosynthesis Ann. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol. 198940503–537.10.1146/annurev.pp.40.060189.002443 [Google Scholar]
  5. Hudson G.S., Evans J.R., Caemmereer S.V., Andrews J.R. On the effect of photosynthesis in crop production. Plant Physiol. 1994;98:294–302. doi: 10.1104/pp.98.1.294. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Marques da Silva J and Arrabica MC (1995). Effect of water stress on Rubisco activity of Setaria sphacelota. In: Photosynthesis: from light to Biosphere. (Ed. P. Mathis, Kluwer ), Acad. Publs. Dordrect=Boston-London, Vol. IV, pp. 545–548.
  7. Mate C.J., Caemmerer S.V., Evans J.R., Hudson G.S., Andrens T.J. Planta. 1998;198:604–613. doi: 10.1007/BF00262648. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Medrano H., Parry M.A.J., Socias X., Lawlor D.W.Long term water stress inactivates Rubisco in subterraness clover Annals of Applied Biology 19971313491–501.10.1111/j.1744-7348.1997.tb05176.x [Google Scholar]
  9. Nicco C., Sarrafi A., Piquemal M., Cavalie G.Genetic variability of Rubisco in tetraploid wheats (Triticum turgidum) Plant Breed. 199311149–54.10.1111/j.1439-0523.1993.tb00606.x [Google Scholar]
  10. O’Leary M.H. Carbon isotope in photosynthesis. Bio. Sci. 1988;38:325–336. [Google Scholar]
  11. O’Leary MH (1993). Biochemical basis of carbon isotope fractionation. In: Stable isotopes and plant carbon/water relations (Eds. Ehleringer, J.R., Hall, A.E. and Farquhar, G.D.). Academic Press, pp. 19–20.
  12. Qingwu X., Soundarajan M., Weiss A., Timothy J., Stephen A., Baenziger P.Genotypic variation of gas exchange parameters and carbon isotope discrimination in winter wheat J. Plant Physiol. 2002159891–898.10.1078/0176-1617-00780 [Google Scholar]
  13. Raghavendra S., Das V.S. Purification and properties of PEPCase and RubPCase in C4 and C3 plants. Z. pflanzenphysiol. 1977;82:315–321. [Google Scholar]
  14. Richards R.A., Rebetzke G.J., Condon A.G., Van Herwaarden A.F. Breeding opportunities for increasing the efficiency of water use and crop yield in temperate cereals. Crop Sci. 2002;42:111–121. doi: 10.2135/cropsci2002.1110. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Shailesh K (2004). Carbon-13 discrimination (delta) and its relationship with water use efficiency (WUE) in wheat. In.: M.Sc thesis, submitted to IARI, New Delhi.
  16. Von Caemmerer S., Farquhar G.D. Some relations between the biochemistry of photosynthetic and gas exchange of leaves. Planta. 1981;53:376–387. doi: 10.1007/BF00384257. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Physiology and molecular biology of plants : an international journal of functional plant biology are provided here courtesy of Springer

RESOURCES