Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Physiology and Molecular Biology of Plants logoLink to Physiology and Molecular Biology of Plants
. 2010 Aug 13;16(1):53–58. doi: 10.1007/s12298-010-0007-9

Characterization of seed storage proteins in high protein genotypes of cowpea [Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.]

Prachi Gupta 1, Rohtas Singh 2,✉, S Malhotra 1, K S Boora 3, H R Singal 1
PMCID: PMC3550628  PMID: 23572954

Abstract

Twenty one genotypes and two check varieties viz. CS-88 and V-240 of cowpea [Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp. ] were screened for total proteins. The total protein content ranged from 22.4 (HC-3) to 27.9 % (HC-98-64) in 21 genotypes whereas in check varieties it was 25.6 (V-240) and 26.0 % (CS-88). Seven genotypes viz. HC-6, HC-5, CP-21, LST-II-C-12, CP-16, COVU-702 and HC-98-64 having high protein content (26.7 to 27.9 %) were selected for further characterization of their seed storage proteins. Globulins were the major protein fraction ranging from 55.6 (LST-II-C-12) to 58.8 % (CP-16 and HC-6) of total protein. Glutelins was the second major fraction ranging from 14.4 to 15.6 % followed by albumins (8.2 to 11.9 %) and prolamins (2.3 to 5.0 %). Content of free amino acids also showed variations amongst genotypes with COVU-702 having maximum and LST-II-C-12 having minimum content. Essential amino acid analysis revealed that S-amino acids (cysteine and methionine) were the first limiting amino acids followed by tryptophan. From the results presented here it could be suggested that two genotypes viz. LST-II-C-12 and HC-5 be used in breeding programmes aimed at developing high protein moth bean varieties with good quality.

Keywords: Genotypes, cowpea, protein fractions, seeds, Vigna unguiculata

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (96.3 KB).

References

  1. Allen D.J. The Pathology of Tropical Food Legumes. Chichester: John Wiley and Sons; 1983. [Google Scholar]
  2. AOAC (1984). Official Methods of Analysis, 14th edn. Association of Official Analytical Chemists. Washington, DC.
  3. Awolumate E.O. Accumulation and quality of storage protein in developing cowpea, mungbean and soybean seeds. J. Sci. Food Agric. 1983;34:1351–1357. doi: 10.1002/jsfa.2740341206. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bala A., Satija D.R., Gupta V.P. Variation and association analysis among protein quality traits in chickpea. Indian J. Genet. Pl. Breed. 1994;54:105–109. [Google Scholar]
  5. Dhawan K., Malhotra S., Dahiya B.S., Singh D. Seed protein fractions and amino acid composition in gram (Cicer arietinum) Plant Fd. Human Nutr. 1991;41:225–232. doi: 10.1007/BF02196390. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Dionex Corporation. Determination of the amino acid content of peptides by AAA-Direct. Technical Note 50. Sunnyvale, CA.
  7. Gonzalez O.N., Banzon E.A., Liggayu R.G., Quinitio P.H. Isolation and chemical composition of mungbean (Phaseolus aureus Roxb.) protein. Philip. J. Sci. 1964;93:47–56. [Google Scholar]
  8. Gupta V.P., Kapoor A.C. Chemical evaluation of protein quality of various grain legumes. Indian J. agric. Sci. 1979;50:393–398. [Google Scholar]
  9. Horax R., Hettiarachchy N.S., Chen P., Jalaluddin M. Preparation and characterization of protein isolate from cow pea (Vigna unguiculata (L.) walp) J. Fd. Sci. 2004;69:114–118. [Google Scholar]
  10. Hussain M.A., Basahy A.Y. Nutrient composition and amino acid pattern of cowpea (Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp, Fabaceae) grown in the Gizan area of Saudi Arabia. Int. J. Fd Sci. Nutr. 1998;49:117–124. doi: 10.3109/09637489809089391. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Kapoor A.C., Gupta Y.P. Chemical evaluation and electrophoretic pattern of soya protein. J. Fd. Sci. Agric. 1977;42:1558–1561. [Google Scholar]
  12. Leverton RM (1967). Soybean protein in mixed foods. In: Proc. Int. Conf. Soybean protein foods, U. S. Dept. Agric., pp. 75–80.
  13. Mahajan R., Malhotra S.P., Singh R. Characterization of seed storage proteins of urdbean (Vigna mingo) Plant Fd. Human Nutr. 1988;38:163–173. doi: 10.1007/BF01091721. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Mendoza E.M.T., Adachi M., Bernardo A.E.N., Utsumi S. Mung bean (Vigna radiate (L.) Wilczek) globulins: purification and characterization. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2001;49:1152–1158. doi: 10.1021/jf001041h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Nie NH, Hull CH and Bent DH (1970). Statistical Package for the Social Sciences. McGraw-Hill. Eds 1 & 2 1970, 1975. New York.
  16. Nielsen S., Ohler T., Mitchell C. Cowpea leaves for human consumption: production, utilization, and nutrient composition. In: Singh B., Mohan Raj D., Dashiell K., Jackai L., editors. Advances in cowpea research. Ibadan, Nigeria: Intr. Inst. Trop. Agric. (IITA) and Japan Intr. Res. Center Agric. Sci. (JIRCASS); 1997. pp. 326–332. [Google Scholar]
  17. Oluwatosin O.B. Genetic and environmental variation for seed yield, lipid and amino acid composition in cowpea [Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp] J. Sci. Fd Agric. 1997;74:107–116. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0010(199705)74:1<107::AID-JSFA776>3.0.CO;2-L. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  18. Osborne T.B. The vegetable proteins. Longmans, Green and Co, London. Padhye VW and Salunkhe DK (1979). Biochemical studies on black gram (Phaseolus mungo L.) seeds. Amino acid composition and subunit constitution of fractions of the proteins. J. Fd. Sci. 1924;44:606–610. [Google Scholar]
  19. Quass C.F. Guidelines for the Production of Cowpeas. Pretoria: National Department of Agriculture; 1995. [Google Scholar]
  20. Rachie K.O. Introduction. In: Singh S.R., Rachie K.O., editors. Cowpea Researches, Production and Utilization. New York: Wiley; 1985. p. 108. [Google Scholar]
  21. Rosario R.R.D., Lozano Y., Neol M.G. The chemical and biochemical composition of legume seeds. 2. Cowpea. Philippine-Agriculturist. 1981;64:49–57. [Google Scholar]
  22. Singh S.P., Misra B.K., Sikka K.C., Chandel K.P., Pant K.C. Studies on some nutritional aspects of ricebean (Vigna umbellate) J. Fd. Sci. Tech. 1985;22:180–185. [Google Scholar]
  23. Turkova V., Klozova E. Comparison of seed proteins in some representatives of the genus Vigna. Biol. Plant. 1985;27:70–73. doi: 10.1007/BF02894637. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  24. Wang N., Daun J.K. Effect of variety and crude protein content on nutrients and certain antinutrients in field peas (Pisum sativum) J. Sci. Fd Agric. 2004;84:1021–1029. doi: 10.1002/jsfa.1742. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  25. Yemm E.W., Cocking E.C. The determination of amino acids with ninhydrin. Analyst. 1955;80:209–213. doi: 10.1039/an9558000209. [DOI] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Physiology and molecular biology of plants : an international journal of functional plant biology are provided here courtesy of Springer

RESOURCES