Skip to main content
Physiology and Molecular Biology of Plants logoLink to Physiology and Molecular Biology of Plants
. 2010 Dec 7;16(4):343–351. doi: 10.1007/s12298-010-0035-5

Yield and yield components of hybrid corn (Zea mays L.) as affected by mycorrhizal symbiosis and zinc sulfate under drought stress

N A Sajedi 1, M R Ardakani 2, F Rejali 3, F Mohabbati 2, Mohammad Miransari 4,
PMCID: PMC3550653  PMID: 23572984

Abstract

With respect to the significance of improving hybrid corn performance under stress, this experiment was conducted at the Islamic Azad University, Arak Branch, Iran. A complete randomized block design with three levels of irrigations (at 100%, 75% and 50% crop water requirement), two levels of arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungi (Glumus intraradisis) (including control), and three levels of zinc (Zn) sulfate (0, 25 and 45 kg ha−1), was performed. Results of the 2-year experiments indicated that irrigation treatment significantly affected corn yield and its components at P = 1%. AM fungi and increasing Zn levels also resulted in similar effects on corn growth and production. Although AM fungi did not significantly affect corn growth at the non-stressed irrigation treatment, at moderate drought stress AM fungi significantly enhanced corn quality and yield relative to the control treatment. The combined effects of AM fungi and Zn sulfate at 45 kg ha−1 application significantly affected corn growth and production. In addition, the tripartite treatments significantly enhanced corn yield at P = 1%. Effects of Zn and AM fungi on plant growth under drought stress is affected by the stress level.

Keywords: Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi, Corn (Zea mays L.), Drought stress, Zinc sulfate

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (211.8 KB).

References

  1. Auge RM. Water relations, drought and vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhiza symbiosis. Mycorrhiza. 2001;11:3–42. doi: 10.1007/s005720100097. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  2. Auge RM, Stodola AJW, Tims JE. Moisture retention properties of a mycorrhizal soil. Plant Soil. 2001;230:87–97. doi: 10.1023/A:1004891210871. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  3. Baker DE, Amachar MC. Nickel, copper, zinc and cadmium. In: Page AL, Miller RH, Keeney DR, editors. Methods of soil analysis, part 2. Madison: American Society of Agronomy; 1982. pp. 323–338. [Google Scholar]
  4. Bray DE. Plant responses to water deficit. Trends Plant Sci. 1997;2:48–54. doi: 10.1016/S1360-1385(97)82562-9. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  5. Brown PH, Cacmak I, Zhang Q (1993) Form and function of zinc in plants. In: Robson AD (ed) Zinc in soil and plants. pp 93–1.6. Kluwar Academic Publishers
  6. Cakmak I. Possible roles of Zinc in protecting plant cells from damage by reactive oxygen species. New Phytol. 2000;2:85–205. doi: 10.1046/j.1469-8137.2000.00630.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Cheong YH, Kim KN, Pandey GK, Gupta R, Grant JJ, Luan S. CLB1, a calcium sensor that differentially regulates salt, drought, and cold responses in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell. 2003;15:1833–1845. doi: 10.1105/tpc.012393. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Daei G, Ardakani MR, Rejali F, Teimuri S, Miransari M. Alleviation of salinity stress on wheat yield, yield components, and nutrient uptake using arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi under field conditions. J Plant Physiol. 2009;166:617–625. doi: 10.1016/j.jplph.2008.09.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Elwan LM. Effect of soil water regimes and inoculation with mycorrhizae on growth and nutrients content of maize plants. J Agric Research. 2001;28:163–172. [Google Scholar]
  10. Feldman F, Idczak E. Inoculum production of vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi for use in tropical nurseries. In: Norris JR, Read DJ, Varma AK, editors. Methods in microbiology, techniques for the study of mycorrhiza. New York: Academic; 1992. [Google Scholar]
  11. Gee GW, Bauder JW. Particle-size analysis. In: Klute A, editor. Methods of soil Analysis, Part 1. 2nd ed., Agronomy Monographs, vol. 9. Madison: ASA and SSSA; 1986. pp. 383–411. [Google Scholar]
  12. Ghazi AK, Zak BM. Field response of wheat to arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and drought stress. Mycorrhiza. 2003;14:263–269. doi: 10.1007/s00572-003-0265-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Giovannetti M, Mosse B. Estimating the percentage of root length colonized (Gridline-Intersect Method) New Phytol. 1980;84:489–500. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.1980.tb04556.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  14. Hopkins WG, Huner NP. Introduction to plant physiology (3rd ed) New york: John Wiely & Sons. Inc; 2004. [Google Scholar]
  15. Knudsen D, Peterson GA, Pratt PF (1982) Lithim, sodium and potassium. In: Page AL et al (ed) Methods of soil analysis: part 2. Chemical and microbiological properties. ASA monograph number 9. p 225–246
  16. Laffitte HR, Edmeades GO. Stress tolerance in tropical maize is linked to constitutive change in ear growth characteristics. Crop Science. 1995;3:820–826. doi: 10.2135/cropsci1995.0011183X003500030031x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  17. Lam F (2004) Corn production as related to sprinkler irrigation acpacity.16th annual central plains irrigation conference, Kearney, Nebraska, Feb 17–18
  18. Liu R, Li M, Meng X. Effects of AM fungi on Endogenous hormones in corn and cotton plants. Mycosystem. 2000;19:91–96. [Google Scholar]
  19. Mahaveer PS, Singh R, Adholeya A. Laboratory manual for basic techniques in arbuscular mycorrhizal research. New Delhi: Center for Mycorrhizal Research, Tata Energy Research Institute; 2000. [Google Scholar]
  20. Marschner H (1993) Nutrient dynamics at the soil–root interface (Rhizosphere). In: Read DJ, Lewis DH, Fitter AH, Alexander IJ (eds) Mycorrhizae in ecosystems. CAB International Publisher
  21. Marschner H, Dell B. Nutrient uptake in mycorrhizal symbiosis. Plant Soil. 1994;159:89–102. [Google Scholar]
  22. Miransari M, Bahrami HA, Rejali F, Malakuti MJ, Torabi H. Using arbuscular mycorrhiza to reduce the stressful effects of soil compaction on corn (Zea mays L.) growth. Soil Biol Biochem. 2007;39:2014–2026. doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2007.02.017. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  23. Miransari M, Bahrami HA, Rejali F, Malakuti MJ. Using arbuscular mycorrhiza to reduce the stressful effects of soil compaction on wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) growth. Soil Biol Biochem. 2008;40:1197–1206. doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2007.12.014. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  24. Miransari M, Rejali F, Bahrami HA, Malakouti MJ. Effects of soil compaction and arbuscular mycorrhiza on corn (Zea mays L.) nutrient uptake. Soil Tillage Res. 2009;103:282–290. doi: 10.1016/j.still.2008.10.015. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  25. Miransari M, Rejali F, Bahrami HA, Malakouti MJ. Effects of arbuscular mycorrhiza, soil sterilization, and soil compaction on wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) nutrients uptake. Soil Tillage Res. 2009;104:48–55. doi: 10.1016/j.still.2008.11.006. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  26. Miransari M. Contribution of arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis to plant growth under different types of soil stresses. Review article. Plant Biol. 2010;12:563–569. doi: 10.1111/j.1438-8677.2009.00308.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Moussa HR, Abdel Aziz M. Comparative response of drought tolerant and drought sensitive maize genotypes to water stress. Aust J Crop Sci. 2008;1:31–36. [Google Scholar]
  28. Munns R. Comparative physiology of salt and water stress. Plant Cell Environ. 2002;25:239–250. doi: 10.1046/j.0016-8025.2001.00808.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Nelson DW, Sommers LE. Determination of total nitrogen in plant material. Agron J. 1973;65:109–112. doi: 10.2134/agronj1973.00021962006500010033x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  30. Nelson DW, Sommers LE. Total carbon, organic carbon, and organic matter. In: Page AL, Miller RH, Keeney DR, editors. Methods of soil analysis, part 2. 2. Madison: American Society of Agronomy; 1982. pp. 539–573. [Google Scholar]
  31. Olsen RS (1954) Estimation of available phosphorus in soils by extraction with sodium bicarbonate. US Department of Agriculture. No. 939
  32. Ramazanzadeh H, Avestan SH, Reihanitabar A (2007) Effect of some factors on zinc absorption in soil calcareous. In 10th Soil Science Congress. Karaj. Iran
  33. Read DJ, Koucheki HK, Hodgson J. Vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhiza in natural vegetation systems. New Phytol. 1976;77:641–653. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.1976.tb04657.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Rhoades DJ. Soluble salts. In: Page AL, Miller RH, Keeney DR, editors. Methods of soil analysis, Part 2. 2. Madison: American Society of Agronomy; 1982. pp. 167–178. [Google Scholar]
  35. Sas Institute Inc. (1988) SAS/STAT user’s guide. Version 6. Fourth edition. Statistical Analysis Institiute Inc., Cary North Carolina. 1988
  36. Song H. Effects of VAM on host plant in condition of drought stress and its mechanisms. Electron J Biology. 2005;3:44–48. [Google Scholar]
  37. Steel RGD, Torrie JH (1980) Principles and procedures of statistics: a biometrical approach, second edition. McGraw-Hill Book Company
  38. Vahedi M (1988) Corn plantation, growth and harvest. In Persian, published by the Bureau of Tarvij Keshavarzi
  39. Wang H, Jin JY. Effects of zinc deficiency and drought on plant growth and metabolism of reactive oxygen species in maize (Zea mays L) Agric Sci China. 2007;6:988–995. [Google Scholar]
  40. Wang H, Liu RL, Jin JY. Effects of zinc and soil moisture on photosynthetic rate and chlorophyll fluorescence parameters of maize. Biol Plant. 2009;53:191–194. doi: 10.1007/s10535-009-0033-z. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  41. Xiong L, Schumaker K, Zhu JK. Cell signaling during cold, drought, and salt stress. Plant Cell. 2002;14:165–183. doi: 10.1105/tpc.010278. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Yilmaz A, Ekiz H, Torun B, Gultekin I, Karanlik S, Bagei SA, Cakmak I. Effect of different zinc application methods on grain and zinc concentration in wheat cultivares grown on zinc deficient calcareous soils. J Plant Nutr. 1997;20:461–471. doi: 10.1080/01904169709365267. [DOI] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Physiology and molecular biology of plants : an international journal of functional plant biology are provided here courtesy of Springer

RESOURCES