Skip to main content
Journal of Food Science and Technology logoLink to Journal of Food Science and Technology
. 2010 Oct 21;47(5):557–563. doi: 10.1007/s13197-010-0101-6

Selection of starter cultures for idli batter fermentation and their effect on quality of idlis

J Sridevi 1, Prakash M Halami 1, S V N Vijayendra 1,
PMCID: PMC3551100  PMID: 23572685

Abstract

Idli batter samples were prepared using lactic starter cultures like Pediococcus pentosaceus (Pp), Enterococcus faecium MTCC 5153 (Ef), Ent. faecium (IB2 Ef-IB2), individually, along with the yeast culture, Candida versatilis (Cv). Idli batter prepared using Ef and Ef-IB2 cultures gave better results, when evaluated for the rise in batter volume (80 ml), level of CO2 production (23.8%), titratable acidity 2.4–3.5% (lactic acid) and pH 4.3–4.4. Storage stability of batter made with selected starter cultures was determined by analyzing the idlis prepared using the batter stored for 1 and 5 days for texture, nutrient composition and sensory quality. Slight variations in the results were seen among the idlis of different combination of cultures, whereas these results are better than that of the idlis made using naturally fermented idli batter. Sensory profile of idlis prepared using starter cultures had a higher score (3.9–4.4) compared to the control (3.6) for overall acceptability.

Keywords: Idli, Microbial profile, Nutrition, Starter culture, Batter, Fermentation, Storage stability, Texture

Introduction

Production of fermented foods is one of the oldest food processing technologies known to man. The diversity of the population of India has given rise to a large number of traditional fermented foods which have been extensively reviewed (Soni and Sandhu 1990; Achaya 1994). Cereals and legume based foods are a major source of economical dietary energy and nutrients, worldwide. The use of desirable microorganisms, particularly those of lactic acid bacteria (LAB), yeasts and fungi have been well documented (Steinkraus 1995). Idli is a white, fermented acid (leavened), soft, spongy textured product and steamed cake of rice (Oryza sativa) and dehulled black gram dhal (Phaseolus mungo). Idli fermentation has been the subject of many research investigations and reviews, covering aspects such as methods of preparation, microbiology and nutritive value (Desikachar et al. 1960; Mukherjee et al. 1965; Steinkraus et al. 1967; Ramakrishnan 1979; Venkatasubbaiah et al. 1984; Thyagaraja et al. 1992; Agrawal et al. 2000; Rati et al. 2003, 2006; Kanchana et al. 2008; Riat and Sadana 2009). Two significant changes occurring in idli fermentation are leavening and acidification of the batter (Jama and Varadaraj 1999).

A starter culture can be defined as a microbial preparation of a large number of cells of at least one microorganism to be added to a raw material to ferment food by accelerating and steering the fermentation process (Leroy and De Vuyst 2004). They cause rapid acidification of the raw material through the production of organic acids, mainly lactic acid. Also, their production of acetic acid, ethanol, aroma compounds, bacteriocins, exopolysaccharides and several enzymes is of importance. In this way they enhance shelf life and microbial safety, improve texture, and contribute to the pleasant sensory profile of the end product (Leroy and De Vuyst 2004). The bacteria identified as a part of the microflora for idli batter fermentation included Leuconostoc mesenteroides, Lactobacillus delbrueckii, Lb. fermentum, Lb. lactis, Lb. brevis, Streptococcus faecalis and Pediococus cerivisiae, which are essential for leavening of batter and for acid production in idli and yeasts such as Geotrichum candidum, Torulopsis holmii, T. candida, Trichosporon pullulans, Candida fragilola, C. kefyr, C. tropicalis, Hansenula anomala and Rhodotorula graminis, which are responsible for pH reduction and may increase the thiamine and riboflavin content (Mukherjee et al. 1965; Reddy et al. 1981; Venkatasubbaiah et al. 1984; Charan and Kadam 1989; Soni and Sandhu 1990, Thyagaraja et al. 1992; Purushothaman et al. 1993; Steinkraus 1995; Agrawal et al. 2000). In order to reduce the fermentation time of idli batter and to increase the shelf life of fermented batter, an improved process for the preparation of shelf-stable idli batter was made available (Varadaraj et al. 1999). Detailed texture profile analysis of idli made from parboiled rice and decorticated black gram was reported (Balasubramanian and Viswanathan 2007). The purpose and scope of the present study was to develop a suitable combination of starter cultures for idli batter fermentation and to evaluate the quality of batter and idlis for nutritional, textural and sensory quality.

Materials and methods

Media

For cultivation and maintenance of LAB, Lactobacillus deMan- Rogosa- Sharpe agar (MRS agar) and for yeasts Sabouraud dextrose (SD) agar (Hi-Media Laboratories Pvt Ltd, Mumbai, India) were used. The lactic cultures were incubated at 37°C for 16 h for the cells to reach late exponential phase in static condition and the yeast culture was grown at 30°C for 48 h.

Preparation of idli batter:

Idli batter was prepared from the mixture of milled rice (Oryza sativa) and dehulled black gram (Phaseolus mungo) dhal in 4:1 ratio. The ingredients (rice and dhal) were processed using good manufacturing process (Agrawal et al. 2000). Soaking was done in potable water for 6–8 h. These ingredients were ground to a fine paste under hygienic conditions (Varadaraj et al. 1999) and pH of the fresh idli batter was checked. Four different starter cultures were used to prepare different idli batter samples using the following combinations: i) Pedicoccus pentosaceus + Candida versatilis, ii) Enterococcus faecium MTCC 5153 + Candida versatilis and iii) Enterococcus faecium IB2 + Candida versatilis. These combinations of starter cultures were added to the idli batter sample at 1% inoculum 0.5% LAB and 0.5% yeast. Idli batter prepared using the traditional method (without steaming the ingredients and without boiling the water used for soaking and grinding and without any added culture natural fermentation) was used as control. For the analysis of texture, nutrient composition and sensory profile of idli samples, the batter samples were prepared individually using 3 different combinations of cultures and naturally fermented batter were packed in polyethylene terephthalate—low density polyethylene (PET-LDPE) laminated pouches and stored at 30°C.

Analysis of idli batter

Rise in batter volume

The idli batter prepared using 3 different culture combinations and the batter without any added culture was poured into 500 ml measuring cylinders, individually, up to 100 ml mark, covered with aluminum foil and were kept at 30°C for 24 h and observed for rise in batter volume. The rise in CO2 production can be correlated with the increase in batter volume. The four idli batter samples were freshly prepared and packed in following three different packaging materials, PET-LDPE laminated pouches, air tight high density polyethylene (HDPE) tins and aluminum foil laminated LDPE pouches. The amount of CO2 produced was analyzed and compared.

The pH of the idli batter samples was checked individually using a microprocessor based digital pH meter (Henna Instruments, Singapore). The CO2 produced during fermentation of idli batter packed in 3 types of packing material, as indicated above, was analyzed using PBI Dansen analyzer. The microbial load of the batter stored at 30 and 10°C was checked for 0–7 days. The batter samples were serially diluted with 0.8% saline individually and appropriate dilutions were pour plated individually using MRS agar (for lactics) and spread plated on SD agar (for yeasts) plates. The plates were incubated at 37°C for 24–48 h. The colonies were counted using colony counter. The microbial load was estimated until the product became deteriorated with visual observation of yeast and molds growth.

Evaluation of idlis prepared using selected starter culture

The idlis made from batter samples prepared using selected combinations of starter cultures and stored for 1 and 5 days were evaluated for textural, sensory and nutritional parameters. The hardness of idlis was tested using Instron texture analyzer (Lloyds Instron texturomenter LRSK, UK) through shear force measurement. The shear force values in Newton (N) recorded under the operating conditions of 100 kg load with 100 mm/min plunger speed and shear plunger. The sensory evaluation of idlis prepared by the selected combinations of starter cultures was carried out organoleptically. The idlis were evaluated by 50 untrained judges in respect of colour, flavour, appearance, taste and overall acceptability, using 5-point Hedonic scale rating (Watts et al. 1989). The mean of the scores is reported. For estimation of moisture content method described by (Bemal et al. 2004) was used. Idlis (10 g) prepared using different batter were dried to a constant weight in a hot air oven at 100°C and the moisture content was estimated. To determine the ash content (Bemal et al. 2004), 5 g of batter samples were placed in pre-dried crucibles, individually and kept in a muffle furnace at 550°C until they appeared clean and white. Thiamine content was estimated after extracting it from the batter in acidic condition. It was oxidized to thiachrome by alkaline potassium ferricyanide and the intense blue colour fluorescence exhibited by thiochrome was measured fluorometrically as described by (Bemal et al. 2004). The carbohydrate content was determined by the calorimetric method as described by (Ranganna 1977). The energy or calorific value of idlis was determined by oxidizing a known weight of idlis in Bomb calorimeter (Rajdhani, CD-RSB5, Jaipur, India) and the heat produced was measured and expressed in terms of kcal. Nitrogen content was measured using microKjeldahl method (Bemal et al. 2004). Fat soluble material of idlis was extracted with ether bp 40°C from an oven dried sample using Soxhlet extraction method (Bemal et al. 2004). The iron content of idlis was determined by converting the iron to ferric form using oxidizing agent (hydrogen peroxide) and treated with potassium thiocyanate to form the red ferric thiocyanate, which was measured colorimetrically at 480 nm using a spectrophotometer (Elico, Scanning mini spec, Hyderabad, India).

Statistical analysis

The data in triplicate was subjected to statistical analysis by Duncan’s multiple range test (Duncan 1955).

Results and discussion

Both the Enterococcus cultures used in this study produced anti-listerial bacteriocin (Sangeetha et al. 2007). The pH of the samples ranged between 4.5 and 4.3 (Table 1). The combination of Ef and yeast showed high acidity compared to other combinations of starter cultures. Titratable acidity of the samples differed from 3.5 to 2.3%. At the end of fifth day, the combination of starter cultures namely, Ef and yeast and also Ef-IB2 and yeast gave better rise in volume up to 80% than the other combinations, suggesting that it was producing acid (due to lactics) and gas production (mainly by yeast) and with a titratable acidity of 2.3%.

Table 1.

Effect of starter culture in increasing the batter volume, titratable acidity and pH during idli batter fermentation

Storage period days Combination of starter cultures
PP + Cv Ef-IB2 + Cv Ef + Cv NF
RBV TA pH RBV TA pH RBV TA pH RBV TA pH
0 100 ND 6.73 100 ND 6.73 100 ND 6.73 100 ND 6.73
1 105 ± 2.30a 0.7 ± 0.11a 4.7 ± 0.22 a 115 ± 2.12b 0.9 ± 0.11a 4.8 ± 0.121a 115 ± 1.81b 1.2 ± 0.11a 4.7 ± 0.12a 30 ± 3.53c 1.0 ± 0.11a 4.8 ± 0.25a
2 105 ±3.11a 1.7 ± 0.10b 4.6 ± 0.31a 135 ± 3.21 b 1.4 ± 0.10b 4.7 ± 0.22a 135 ± 4.12b 1.7 ± 0.13a 4.7 ± 0.15a 140 ± 3.12c 1.6 ± 0.15b 4.7 ± 0.13a
3 105 ± 4.80a 2.1 ± 0.21c 4.6 ± 0.35a 155 ± 3.51d 2.0 ± 0.21c 4.6 ± 0.11a 155 ± 5.51c 2.3 ± 0.25a 4.5 ± 0.21a 140 ± 2.51b 2.2 ± 0.21c 4.6 ± 0.34a
4 105 ± 3.72a 2.7 ± 0.12d 4.6 ± 0.21a 180 ± 4.01c 2.7 ± 0.32e 4.5 ± 0.31a 180 ± 6.11c 2.9 ± 0.33a 4.4 ± 0.31a 140 ± 3.22b 2.9 ± 0.12d 4.5 ± 0.22a
5 105 ± 2.52a 3.3±.0.21e 4.4 ± 0.41a 180 ± 3.81c 2.6 ± 0.11d 4.4 ± 0.22a 180 ± 5.85c 3.6 ± 0.11a 4.3 ± 0.21a 140 ± 2.81b 3.5 ± 0.21e 4.5 ± 0.11a

PP Pediococcus pentosaceus; Ef Enterocuccus faecium MTCC 5153; Ef-IB2 Ent. faecium IB2; Cv Candida versatilis; NF Natural fermentation; RBV Rise in batter volume; TA Titratable acidity (% lactic acid); ND Not determined

Mean scores, in a row within the treatment, without common superscripts are significantly different (p < 0.05) (n = 3)

Quantitative analysis of CO2 production

Rate of CO2 production was higher in samples packed with aluminum foil-LDPE laminate pouches compared to other two packing materials (Table 2). It might be due to the non-permeability of aluminium foil to gas. The highest amount of CO2 production in natural fermentation was 45.6% in aluminum foil-LDPE laminate pouches. Among all the three combinations of the cultures used, the combination of Ef and yeast resulted in higher CO2 production in all types of packing materials and the maximum of 32.2% was observed in pouches prepared with aluminum foil-LDPE laminate. The combination of starter cultures of Ef-IB2 + Cv and Ef + Cv produced high rate of CO2 due to the metabolic activity of yeast and its compatibility with added lactic culture. The rate of CO2 production due to microbial fermentation can directly be correlated to the rise in batter volume. This is due to of a large number of yeasts present in the batter.

Table 2.

Rate of carbon dioxide production by different starter cultures during idli batter fermentation

Fermentation period, days Amount of CO2 produced (%)/Combinations of starter culture
Pp + Cv Ef-IB2 + Cv Ef + Cv NF
PET laminated LDPE
1 14.6 ± 1.55b 15.3 ± 1.42b 16.2 ± 1.51b 12.0 ± 1.43a
2 16.2 ± 1.62b 16.2 ± 1.36b 17.3 ± 1.44b 12.0 ± 1.51a
3 17.1 ± 1.51a 17.7 ± 1.44a 18.7 ± 1.52a 21.3 ± 1.44b
4 19.3 ± 1.63a 19.9 ± 1.52a 20.2 ± 1.54a 21.3 ± 1.63a
5 20.3 ± 1.58a 22.2 ± 1.45b 23.8 ± 1.62b 23.0 ± 1.52b
Aluminum foil laminated LDPE
1 16.4 ± 1.15a 21.6 ± 1.19b 21.9 ± 1.22b 23.0 ± 1.41b
2 22.7 ± 1.26a 26.4 ± 1.22b 26.9 ± 1.41b 27.3 ± 1.33b
3 25.3 ± 1.28a 30.0 ± 1.42b 29.0 ± 1.53b 35.0 ± 1.41c
4 27.8 ± 1.58a 30.9 ± 1.31b 31.1 ± 1.51b 41.4 ± 1.46c
5 29.3 ± 1.42a 30.2 ± 1.26a 32.2 ± 1.43b 45.6 ± 2.17c
HDPE plastic ware with air tight lid
1 12.2 ± 1.12b 9.3 ± 1.02a 9.6 ± 1.11a 12.3 ± 1.12b
2 13.7 ± 1.02b 11.7 ± 1.21a 12.2 ± 1.12a 13.9 ± 1.21b
3 15.9 ± 1.22b 13.9 ± 1.11a 15.8 ± 1.13b 15.2 ± 1.46b
4 16.3 ± 1.12ab 15.4 ± 1.14b 17.3 ± 1.23b 16.8 ± 1.55ab
5 17.0 ± 1.31a 17.2 ± 1.12a 20.8 ± 1.45b 17.9 ± 1.41a

PP Pediococcus pentosaceus; Ef Enterocuccus faecium MTCC 5153; Ef-IB2 Ent. faecium IB2; Cv Candida versatilis; NF Natural fermentation

Mean scores, in a row within the treatment, without common superscripts are significantly different (p < 0.05) (n = 3)

Texture analysis

The hardness of idlis increased with longer storage period and it was high on 5 day old idli batter when compared to 1 day old idli batter (Table 3). The idlis prepared using naturally fermented batter required greater force to break. Hence, the idlis prepared from Ef-IB2 and yeast and Ef and yeast combinations were more soft compared to idlis prepared from the combination of Pp + yeast culture. The hardness of idlis increased due to the increase in acidity.

Table 3.

Textural quality shear force, (Newton) of idlis prepared using different starter cultures

Fermentation period, days Combination of starter cultures
PP + Cv Ef- IB2 + Cv Ef + Cv NF
1 6.4 ± 1.14aS 5.3 ± 0.91a 5.7 ± 0.55a 9.5 ± 1.15b
5 8.5 ± 1.25b 9.0 ± 1.14b 8.2 ± 0.92b ND

PP Pediococcus pentosaceus; Ef Enterocuccus faecium MTCC 5153; Ef-IB2 Ent. faecium IB2; Cv Candida versatilis; NF Natural fermentation; ND Not determined

Mean scores, in a column within the treatment, without common superscripts are significantly different (p < 0.05) (n = 3)

Nutrient analysis of idlis

The observations of the first and the fifth day samples showed variations in the nutrient content (Table 4). The nutrient contents were higher in first day sample compared to fifth day sample. In the first day sample, Pp + Cv combination gave better result for protein and fat and the carbohydrate content was higher in Ef-IB2 + Cv. The natural fermented idlis had high contents of carbohydrate, protein and iron. In the 5th day sample, the higher carbohydrate content in idlis prepared using Pp + Cv, higher fat content in Ef-IB2 + Cv and higher energy in the idlis prepared using EF + Cv combination were noticed. The thiamine was not detected in idli of any combination of cultures. It may be due to the polished rice used for the batter preparation. From the results, much difference was not seen among the idlis prepared with these combinations of cultures and the idlis prepared using the batter fermented naturally. Formation of acids can both increase the levels of bioactive compounds such as total amount of phenolic compounds or decrease the levels of some other compounds, such as thiamine, ferulic acid, dehydrodimers, tocopherols and tocotrienols (Boskov-Hansen et al. 2002; Liukkonen et al. 2003).

Table 4.

Nutrients in idlis prepared using different starter cultures

Parameter Day 1 Day 5
PP + Cv Ef-IB2 + Cv EF + Cv NF PP + Cv Ef-IB2 + Cv Ef + Cv
Moisture g (%) 51.9 ± 1.41a 50.9 ± 2.82a 50.2 ± 2.62a 50.5 ± 1.12 50.2 ± 3.12a 48.0 ± 2.82a 49.0 ± 3.62a
Energy kcal) 42.8 ± 2.52b 43.4 ± 2.76b 43.1 ± 3.24b 43.2 ± 1.04 37.2 ± 2.44a 37.7 ± 1.94a 38.1 ± 3.14a
Carbohydrate g (%) 8.1 ± 1.14a 7.7 ± 1.42a 7.9 ± 0.82a 8.2 ± 0.92 7.4 ± 0.92a 6.3 ± 0.82a 6.7 ± 1.52a
Protein g (%) 3.3 ± 0.65a 3.2 ± 0.64a 3.2 ± 0.14a 3.3 ± 0.22 3.0 ± 0.42a 2.9 ± 0.32a 3.0 ± 1.34a
Fat g (%) 0.2 ± 0.11a 0.1 ± 0.12a 0.1 ± 0.16a 0.1 ± 0.11 0.1 ± 0.22a 0.1 ± 0.14a 0.1 ± 1.46a
Iron mg 1.9 ± 0.11b 2.8 ± 1.21b 2.8 ± 0.12b 3.8 ± 0.32 ND 0.9 ± 0.16a 0.9 ± 0.11a
Ash g (%) 36.7 ± 2.24a 37.8 ± 2.33a 38.3 ± 2.12a 38.2 ± 2.82a 35.4 ± 2.12a 36.4 ± 2.52a 37.4 ± 2.48a

PP Pediococcus pentosaceus; Ef Enterocuccus faecium MTCC 5153; Ef-IB2 Ent. faecium IB2; Cv Candida versatilis; NF Natural fermentation; ND Not detected

Mean scores, in a row within the treatment, without common superscripts are significantly different (p < 0.05) (n = 3)

Microbial profile

Increase in viable count was observed till day 4 and day 6 in the samples maintained at 30 and at 10°C conditions, respectively (Table 5). After that, the samples kept at 30°C were spoiled, whereas, in the samples stored at 10°C, the decrease in the viable count was observed in all the combination of starter cultures. In day 1 samples, the microbial load indicated high yeast count which related to higher CO2 production and less lactic count, giving soft texture to idlis. In day 5 sample, low yeast count was observed compared to lactic count, produced high acidity and gave hardness to the final product. This confirms the necessity of cold storage to extend the shelf life of batter beyond 1 day. Decrease in viable count beyond 4 days of storage might be due to increased acidic conditions due to the fermentation of ingredients by the lactic cultures.

Table 5.

Microbial profile of idli batter at different storage temperatures

Storage Period, days Microbial count (Log10 cfu/g)
PP + Cv Ef-IB2 + Cv Ef + Cv
10°C 30°C 10°C 30°C 10°C 30°C
Lactics Yeasts Lactics Yeasts Lactics Yeasts Lactics Yeasts Lactics Yeasts Lactics Yeasts
0 7.3a 7.3a 7.1a 7.3a 7.1a 7.4a
1 8.6 ± 1.12a 8.7 ± 1.22a 9.2 ± 1.42b 9.25 ± 1.42b 8.6 ± 1.22a 8.7 ± 1.22a 9.1 ± 1.32b 9.2 ± 1.22b 8.3 ± 0.94a 8.6 ± 0.62a 9.1 ± 0.12b 9.4 ± 1.34b
2 8.7 ± 0.94a 8.8 ± 1.32a 9.3 ± 1.52b 9.29 ± 1.22b 8.8 ± 1.12a 8.8 ± 1.02a 9.3 ± 0.84b 9.3 ± 1.14b 8.6 ± 0.88a 8.8 ± 0.52a 9.4 ± 1.52b 9.4 ± 1.22b
3 8.8 ± 0.82a 9.0 ± 1.54a 9.5 ± 1.42b 9.4 ± 1.32b 9.0 ± 1.44a 9.1 ± 1.14a 9.5 ± 0.92b 9.5 ± 1.23b 8.6 ± 0.62a 8.9 ± 0.92a 9.6 ± 1.34b 9.5 ± 1.54b
4 ND ND 10.1 ± 1.64c 10.01 ± 1.44c ND ND 10.1 ± 1.24c 10.1 ± 1.6c ND ND 9.9 ± 1.66b 10.0 ± 1.78b
5 ND ND 9.2 ± 1.02b 9.0 ± 1.12b ND ND 9.2 ± 1.16b 9.1 ± 1.14b ND ND 9.3 ± 1.02b 8.8 ± 1.12b
6 9.1 ± 1.22a 9.1 ± 1.42a ND ND 9.0 ± 1.22a 9.1 ± 1.12a ND ND 9.0 ± 1.02a 9.0 ± 1.02a ND ND
7 8.9 ± 1.11a 9.0 ± 1.12a ND ND 9.0 ± 1.32a 9.1 ± 1.02a ND ND 8.9 ± 0.92a 9.0 ± 0.64a ND ND

PP Pediococcus pentosaceus; Ef Enterocuccus faecium MTCC 5153; Ef-IB2 Ent. faecium IB2; Cv Candida versatilis; NF Natural fermentation; ND Not Determined; Results are average of 3 independent experiments done in duplicate with standard deviation

Mean scores, in a row within the treatment, without a common letters are significantly different (p < 0.05) by DMRT

Sensory profile

The results of Table 6 indicate that the overall acceptability decreased with increase in storage period of idli batter. In the first day, the Pp + Cv combination of idli had high score for appearance, flavour and taste. However, the overall acceptability and the colour scores were good for Ef-IB2 + Cv combination. On the fifth day, the appearance, colour and flavour scores were good for Pp + Cv. However, overall acceptability was good for idlis prepared by using Ef + Cv cultures. Thus the idlis made from Ef + Cv combination showed better results compared to idlis prepared using the combination of Ef-IB2 + Cv after 5 days storage.

Table 6.

Sensory scores of fresh idlis prepared using selected combinations of starter cultures

Parameter PP + Cv Ef-IB2 + Cv Ef + Cv NF
1e 5 1 5 1 5 1 5
Appearance 3.7 ± 0.12a 3.5 ± 0.12a 3.7 ± 0.22a 3.1 ± 0.22a 3.1 ± 0.14a 3.2 ± 0.12a 3.5 ± 0.12a ND
Colour 3.5 ± 0.14a 2.8 ± 0.22a 4.0 ± 0.42b 2.6 ± 0.14a 3.7 ± 0.44a 2.5 ± 0.12a 3.6 ± 0.22a ND
Flavour 4.5 ± 0.32c 3.0 ± 0.14b 4.4 ± 0.44c 2.8 ± 0.32a 4.1 ± 0.56b 2.8 ± 0.34a 3.8 ± 0.26a ND
Taste 4.3 ± 0.26a 2.3 ± 0.22a 4.0 ± 0.36a 2.2 ± 0.22a 4.2 ± 0.44a 2.4 ± 0.26a 3.9 ± 0.24a ND
Overall acceptability 3.9 ± 0.32b 2.3 ± 0.24a 4.4 ± 0.32d 2.3 ± 0.12a 4.2 ± 0.58c 2.4 ± 0.22b 3.6 ± 0.22a ND

PP Pediococcus pentosaceus; Ef Enterocuccus faecium MTCC 5153; Ef-IB2 Ent. faecium IB2; Cv Candida versatilis; NF Natural fermentation; eStorage period of batter in days at 30°C. ND Not done

Mean scores, in a row within the treatment, without common superscripts are significantly different (p < 0.05) (n = 50 panelists)

Conclusion

The effect of 2 different strains Enterococcus faecalis, Pediococcus pentosaceus and the yeast Candida versatilis on the quality of idli batter fermentation and sensory quality of the idlis was studied. Slight variation in the results of the physic-chemical parameters like rise in batter volume, pH and acidity were seen in batter fermented by different combination of cultures. However, these results are higher than that of the idlis made using naturally fermented idli batter. Aluminum foil laminated LDPE pouches were found to be better in extending the keeping quality of the batter. Sensory profile of the idlis prepared using starter cultures Ent. faecium IB2 and Candida versatilis had a higher score (4.4), when compared to the control (3.6) for overall acceptability. This clearly indicates the importance of use of starter cultures in the preparation of fermented foods than the natural fermentation. Thus use of this culture can help to extend the keeping quality of the batter.

Acknowledgement

Authors are thankful to Prakash V, Director, CFTRI, Mysore, for his interest in the area of probiotics and for providing the facilities. Authors sincerely thank DST, Govt. of India, for providing financial help in-terms of Indo-Italian collaborative project (POC2005/7). Authors also thank Ravi R, Scientist, Sensory Science Dept., CFTRI, for statistical analysis of the data.

References

  1. Achaya KT. Indian foods: A traditional companion. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1994. [Google Scholar]
  2. Agrawal R, Rati ER, Vijayendra SVN, Varadaraj MC, Prasad MS, Nand K. Flavour profile of idli batter prepared from defined microbial starter cultures. World J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2000;16:687–690. doi: 10.1023/A:1008939807778. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  3. Balasubramanian S, Viswanathan R. Texture profile analysis of idli made from parboiled rice and decorticated black gram. J Food Sci Technol. 2007;44:548–550. [Google Scholar]
  4. Bemal JS, Grenal RB, Kapoor CM, Garg MK. Practical methods in food analysis. Udaipur: Agrotech Publ Academy; 2004. [Google Scholar]
  5. Boskov-Hansen H, Andersen MF, Nielsen LM, Back-Knudsen KF, Meyer AS, Christensen LP, Hansen A. Changes in dietary fibre, phenolic acids and activities of endogenous enzymes during rye bread making. Eur Food Res Technol. 2002;214:33–42. doi: 10.1007/s00217-001-0417-6. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  6. Charan JK, Kadam SS. Nutritional improvement of cereals by sprouting. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 1989;28:401–437. doi: 10.1080/10408398909527508. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Desikachar HSR, Radhakrishnamurthy R, Ramarao G, Kadkol SB, Srinivasan M, Subrahmanyan V. Studies on idli fermentation. I: Some accompanying changes in the batter. J Sci Ind Res. 1960;196:168–172. [Google Scholar]
  8. Duncan DB. Multiple range and multiple F test. Biometrics. 1955;11:1–42. doi: 10.2307/3001478. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  9. Jama YH, Varadaraj MC. Antibacterial effect of plantaricin LP84 on food borne pathogenic bacteria occurring as contaminants during idli batter fermentation. World J Microbiol Biotechnol. 1999;15:27–32. doi: 10.1023/A:1008887201516. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  10. Kanchana S, Raghavan GSV, Venkatesh S, Yuan G. Quality assessment of dehydrated Idli. J Food Sci Technol. 2008;45:177–179. [Google Scholar]
  11. Leroy F, De Vuyst L. Functional lactic acid bacteria starter cultures for the food fermentation industry. Trends Food Sci Technol. 2004;15:67–78. doi: 10.1016/j.tifs.2003.09.004. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  12. Liukkonen KH, Katine K, Withelmson A, Myllymaki O, Lampi AM, Karimoto S, Piironen V, Heinonen SM, Nurmi T, Adlercreutz H, Peltoketo A, Pislava JM, Hetaniemi V, Poutanen K. Process induced changes on bioactive compounds in whole grain rye. Proc Nutr Soc. 2003;62:117–122. doi: 10.1079/PNS2002218. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Mukherjee SK, Albury MN, Pederson CS, Van Veen AG, Steinkraus KH. Role of Leuconostoc mesenteroides in leavening the batter of idli, a fermented food of India. Appl Microbiol. 1965;13:227–231. doi: 10.1128/am.13.2.227-231.1965. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Purushothaman D, Dhanapal N, Rangaswami G. Indian idli, dosa, dhokla, khaman and related fermentations. In: Steinkraus KH, editor. Handbook of indigenous fermented foods. New York: Marcel Dekker Inc; 1993. pp. 149–165. [Google Scholar]
  15. Ramakrishnan CV. Studies on Indian fermented foods. Baroda J Nutr. 1979;6:1–57. [Google Scholar]
  16. Ranganna S. Manual of analysis of fruit and vegetable products. New Delhi: McGraw-Hill; 1977. [Google Scholar]
  17. Rati ER, Vijayendra SVN, Varadaraj MC, Nirmala Devi S, Agrawal R, Nand K, Prasad MS. Fermentation technologies for smaller communities. J Rural Technol. 2003;1(1):28–32. [Google Scholar]
  18. Rati ER, Vijayendra SVN, Varadaraj MC. In: Food biotechnology. 2. Shetty K, Paliyath G, Pometto A, Levin RE, editors. Boca Raton: CRC Taylor and Francis; 2006. pp. 1759–1794. [Google Scholar]
  19. Reddy NR, Sathe SK, Pierson MD, Salunkhe DK. Idli, an Indian fermented food: a Review. J Food Qual. 1981;5:89–101. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-4557.1982.tb00736.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  20. Riat P, Sadana B. Effect of fermentation on amino acid composition of cereal and pulse based foods. J Food Sci Technol. 2009;46:247–250. [Google Scholar]
  21. Sangeetha KP, Raghavendra P, Badarinath V, Vijayendra SVN, Halami PM (2007) Development of defined starter culture for food fermentation. 77th Annual Symp, National Academy of Science, India, CFTRI, Mysore, 6–8th December
  22. Soni SK, Sandhu DK. Indian fermented foods: microbiological and biochemical aspects. Indian J Microbiol. 1990;30:135–157. [Google Scholar]
  23. Steinkraus KH. Handbook of indigenous fermented foods. New York: Marcel Dekker Inc; 1995. pp. 111–347. [Google Scholar]
  24. Steinkraus KH, Van Veck AG, Theireau DB. Studies on idli-an Indian fermented black gram rice food. Food Technol. 1967;21(6):110–111. [Google Scholar]
  25. Thyagaraja N, Otani H, Hosono A. Studies on microbiological changes during the fermentation of idli. Lebensm Wiss Technol. 1992;25:77–79. [Google Scholar]
  26. Varadaraj MC, Rati ER, Agarwal R, Vijayendra SVN, Prasad MS, Nand K (1999) An improved process for the preparation of shelf stable idli batter. Indian Patent IN 192486
  27. Venkatasubbaiah P, Dwarakanath CT, Sreenivasa Murthy V. Microbiological and physicochemical changes in idli batter during fermentation. J Food Sci Technol. 1984;22:59–63. [Google Scholar]
  28. Watts BMJ, Limarki GL, Jeffrey LK, Elias LG. Basic sensory methods for food evaluation. Ottawa: International Development Research Centre; 1989. pp. 1–16. [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of food science and technology are provided here courtesy of Springer

RESOURCES