Abstract
Ruegeria pomeroyi expresses carbon monoxide (CO) dehydrogenase and oxidizes CO; however, CO has no effect on growth. Nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectra showed that CO has no effect on cellular metabolite profiles. These data support ecosystem models proposing that, even though bacterioplankton CO oxidation is biogeochemically significant, it has an insignificant effect on bacterioplankton productivity.
TEXT
Aerobic chemolithoautotrophic utilization of carbon monoxide (CO) by carboxidotrophic bacteria has been studied for some time (1). Carboxidotrophs use CO oxidoreductase, commonly referred to as CO dehydrogenase (CODH), to convert CO to carbon dioxide (CO2). With the energy conserved from CO oxidation, carboxidotrophs assimilate the CO2 produced from CO, typically via the Calvin Benson Bassham cycle, with the key enzyme ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase oxygenase (RuBisCO) (2).
Primarily as a result of genome sequencing, a relatively new group of CO-utilizing bacteria have been identified and termed the “carboxydovores” (2). In contrast to carboxidotrophs, carboxydovores appear unable to use CO as a source of carbon for growth. Typical elevated CO concentrations used to grow carboxidotrophs appear to inhibit growth of some carboxydovores, and many lack the metabolic capacity to assimilate CO2 (3). Carboxydovores are probably chemolithoheterotrophs, using CO as a supplementary energy source but requiring organic carbon for growth (2, 3).
Ruegeria pomeroyi DSS-3 is one of the group of carboxydovores first identified by King (3). The R. pomeroyi genome contains two different CO oxidation (cox) gene operons and lacks RuBisCO (4). Even though R. pomeroyi has been shown to oxidize CO (3–5), the effects of CO oxidation on R. pomeroyi, or any other CO-oxidizing marine Roseobacter clade strain, remain uncharacterized. The aim of this study is to establish a baseline understanding of CO physiology and metabolism in the model marine bacterioplankton R. pomeroyi.
R. pomeroyi was grown in marine ammonium mineral salt medium (MAMS) modified from that described in reference 6 by adding NaCl (20 g per liter) and was supplemented with glucose. CO was added to flask headspaces (0.1%), and flasks were incubated with shaking (150 rpm) at 30°C. CO uptake was monitored using an electrochemical CO meter (detection limit, ∼17 ppm) (Anton, United Kingdom), and growth was measured using absorbance (optical density at 600 nm [OD600]) (5). Glucose concentration was determined using a hexokinase/glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase assay (Sigma-Aldrich, United Kingdom).
R. pomeroyi growth corresponded with glucose uptake (Fig. 1). Growth rates with glucose and with glucose plus CO were 0.116 ± 0.010 h−1 and 0.114 ± 0.012 h−1, showing that CO had no significant effect during exponential growth. Throughout the experiment, R. pomeroyi depleted the headspace concentration of CO, indicating that CO oxidation occurs independently of growth phase. No effect of CO was detected when cells became glucose starved during stationary phase (Fig. 1). CO also had no effect on growth rate and growth yield on R. pomeroyi grown in MAMS medium with 10-fold less glucose (data not shown).
Fig 1.

Growth and glucose uptake of Ruegeria pomeroyi DSS-3 under control (glucose only; white symbols, n = 5 replicate flasks) and plus CO (glucose plus 0.1% CO; black symbols; n = 5 replicate flasks). The hatched line shows CO concentrations in the flask headspace during growth. Note that because the flasks needed to be opened to sample the cultures, the flask headspace was respiked with CO after each sample was taken. Error bars show standard deviations.
Based on the annotated genome, R. pomeroyi glucose catabolism is possible through both the Embden-Meyerhof-Parnas (EMP) glycolysis pathway and the Entner-Doudoroff pathway. EMP glycolysis when combined with the Krebs cycle and oxidative phosphorylation has a potential yield of 38 ATP molecules per glucose molecule (7). Assuming that one CO molecule yields one ATP molecule (8), the potential relative energy gain from CO under the experimental conditions here is <1% of the potential energy gain from glucose. Under natural seawater glucose concentrations, ranging from 1 μM to 10 nM (9), and CO concentrations of ≤15 nM in coastal waters and ≤3 nM in oligotrophic waters (10), CO still contributes only <1% toward the theoretical energy budget of the cell.
Previous studies on CO oxidation in heterotrophically grown facultative carboxidotrophs have used higher CO concentrations than those used in this study, typically 10 to 90% (11–14). Comparative experimentation is not possible, because R. pomeroyi is inhibited at headspace CO concentrations of >1% (3). Inhibition caused by high CO concentrations has been shown in a range of bacterial species and is probably caused by damage to the electron transport chain (12). Hydrogenophaga pseudoflava when grown heterotrophically in the presence of CO (10%) had an increased growth yield but similar growth rate compared to those of cells grown in the absence of CO (13). Similar mixotrophic growth with high CO has also been shown in other facultative carboxidotrophs (14). However, some facultative carboxidotrophs when grown heterotrophically do not oxidize CO (11, 15).
Strains of the closely related Stappia spp. and Labrenzia aggregata have the potential to utilize CO as an energy source and as a carbon source, because some harbor the RuBisCO gene cbbL (16). Stappia and L. aggregata grown heterotrophically also rapidly oxidize CO at the same concentrations as those used in this study (16). Alkalilimnicola ehrlichii, a facultative arsenite-oxidizing chemoautotroph isolated from Mono Lake, when grown heterotrophically can also oxidize CO at concentrations similar to those used in this study and also did not show any evidence of increased growth from CO (17).
In order to determine CODH activity, exponential-phase cells were harvested and proteins were extracted using BugBuster master mix (Novagen) by following the manufacturer's instructions. Cell debris was removed by centrifugation, and the protein concentration in the resulting supernatant was determined (18). Native polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis was used for in-gel activity staining of CODH and was conducted as previously described (19).
Glucose-grown cells and glucose-grown cells plus CO showed similar CODH activities, indicating that CODH enzyme expression and activity was the same under both conditions (Fig. 2). CODH enzyme activity was also present in H. pseudoflava grown heterotrophically using glucose in the presence and absence of CO (13). Proteome analysis of R. pomeroyi incubated in seawater collected from a range of sources (e.g., marina, beach) indicates, however, that CODH expression can be variable (20).
Fig 2.

In-gel activity staining of carbon monoxide dehydrogenase in R. pomeroyi cell extracts (74 μg protein per lane) from glucose-grown cells and glucose-grown cells plus CO. Numbers show experimental replicates.
Metabolomics can provide an accurate snapshot of the global physiological and metabolic state of bacterial cells. Exponential-phase cells (15 ml) were harvested by filtration onto ashed GF/F filters (Whatman, United Kingdom) and washed twice with 15 ml of 350 mM NaCl (30°C) before metabolism was quenched using liquid nitrogen, and after which cells were immediately stored at −80°C. Metabolites were extracted and profiled with one-dimensional 1H-nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy using established protocols (I. Lidbury, R. Davidson, U. Sommer, M. R. Viant, M. Cunliffe, submitted for publication). Comparison of NMR spectra from R. pomeroyi grown with and without CO showed that there was no significant difference in the profile of cellular metabolites, indicating that CO had no effect on metabolism (Fig. 3).
Fig 3.

Principle component analysis of one-dimensional 1H-nuclear magnetic resonance spectra of R. pomeroyi cells grown with glucose and glucose plus CO.
Bacterioplankton oxidation is the primary CO sink in the marine environment, consuming up to 86% of the CO produced and minimizing the amount of CO that escapes to the atmosphere (21). cox genes are abundant in marine metagenomes, indicating that CO oxidation capability is widely distributed in the bacterioplankton (4, 8, 22). Moran and Miller (8) modeled the potential effects of CO-based lithoheterotrophy on bacterioplankton productivity along the Mid- and South Atlantic bights. The model indicated that only a minor fraction (maximum of 0.2%) of bacterioplankton productivity is attributed to CO oxidation. These data support the conclusion that bacterioplankton have the capacity to rapidly oxidize CO; however, CO has a negligible effect on bacterioplankton production.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
This work was supported by the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom. NMR spectroscopy was conducted at the Natural Environment Research Council Biomolecular Analysis Facility Birmingham and was supported by the grant Developing Metabolomics to Study Energy Metabolism in Marine Bacteria (NBAF467).
Footnotes
Published ahead of print 9 November 2012
REFERENCES
- 1. Meyer O, Schlegel HG. 1983. Biology of aerobic carbon monoxide-oxidizing bacteria. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 37:277–310 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. King GM, Weber CF. 2007. Distribution, diversity and ecology of aerobic CO-oxidizing bacteria. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 5:107–118 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. King GM. 2003. Molecular and culture-based analyses of aerobic carbon monoxide oxidizer diversity. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 69:7257–7265 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Moran MA, Buchan A, Gonzalez JM, Heidelberg JF, Whitman WB, Kiene RP, Henriksen JR, King GM, Belas R, Fuqua C, Brinkac L, Lewis M, Johri S, Weaver B, Pai G, Eisen JA, Rahe E, Sheldon WM, Ye W, Miller TR, Carlton J, Rasko DA, Paulsen IT, Ren Q, Daugherty SC, Deboy RT, Dodson RJ, Durkin AS, Madupu R, Nelson WC, Sullivan SA, Rosovitz MJ, Haft DH, Selengut J, Ward N. 2004. Genome sequence of Silicibacter pomeroyi reveals adaptations to the marine environment. Nature 432:910–913 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Cunliffe M. 2011. Correlating carbon monoxide oxidation with cox genes in the abundant marine Roseobacter clade. ISME J. 5:685–691 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Goodwin K, Varner R, Crill P, Oremland R. 2001. Consumption of tropospheric levels of methyl bromide by C(1) compound-utilizing bacteria and comparison to saturation kinetics. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 67:5437–5443 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Madigan MT, Martinki JM, Parker J. 2003. Brock biology of microorganisms, 10th ed Pearson Education Inc., Boston, MA [Google Scholar]
- 8. Moran MA, Miller WL. 2007. Resourceful heterotrophs make the most of light in the coastal ocean. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 5:792–800 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Vaccaro RF, Hicks SE, Jannasch HW, Carey FG. 1968. The occurrence and role of glucose in seawater. Limnol. Oceanogr. 13:356–360 [Google Scholar]
- 10. Tolli JD, Taylor CD. 2005. Biological CO oxidation in the Sargasso Sea and in Vineyard Sound, Massachusetts. Limnol. Oceanogr. 50:1205–1212 [Google Scholar]
- 11. Conrad W, Meyer O, Seiler W. 1981. Role of carboxydobacteria in consumption of atmospheric carbon monoxide by soil. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 42:211–215 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Cypinoka H, Meyer O. 1982. Influence of carbon monoxide on growth and respiration of carboxydobacteria and other aerobic organisms. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 15:209–214 [Google Scholar]
- 13. Kiessling M, Meyer O. 1982. Profitable oxidation of carbon monoxide or hydrogen during heterotrophic growth of Pseudomonas carboxydoflava. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 13:333–338 [Google Scholar]
- 14. Kim YJ, Kim YM. 1989. Induction of carbon monoxide dehydrogenase during heterotrophic growth of Acinetobacter sp. strain JC1 DSM 3803 in the presence of carbon monoxide. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 59:207–210 [Google Scholar]
- 15. Sorokin DY, Tourova TP, Kovaleva OL, Kuenen JG, Muyzer G. 2010. Aerobic carboxydotrophy under extremely haloalkaline conditions in Alkalispirillum/Alkalilimnicola strains isolated from soda lakes. Microbiology 156:819–827 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Weber CF, King GM. 2007. Physiological, ecological and phylogenetic characterization of Stappia, a marine CO-oxidizing bacterial genus. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 73:1266–1276 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Hoeft SE, Blum JS, Stolz JF, Tabita FR, Witte B, King GM, Santini JM, Oremland RS. 2007. Alkalilimnicola ehrlichii sp. nov., a novel, arsenite-oxidizing haloalkaliphilic gammaproteobacterium capable of chemoautotrophic or heterotrophic growth with nitrate or oxygen as the electron acceptor. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 57:504–512 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Bradford MM. 1976. Rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Analyt. Biochem. 72:248–254 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Lorite MJ, Tachil J, Sanjuin J, Meyer O, Bedmar EJ. 2000. Carbon monoxide dehydrogenase activity in Bradyrhizobium japonicum. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 66:1871–1876 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Christie-Oleza JA, Fernandez B, Nogales B, Bosch R, Armengaud J. 2012. Proteomic insights into the lifestyle of an environmentally relevant marine bacterium. ISME J. 6:124–135 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Zafiriou OC, Andrews SS, Wang W. 2003. Concordant estimates of oceanic carbon monoxide source and sink processes in the Pacific yield a balanced global “blue-water” CO budget. Global Biogeochem. Cycles 17:15–11–15-13 [Google Scholar]
- 22. Mou X, Sun S, Edwards RA, Hodson RE, Moran MA. 2008. Bacterial carbon processing by generalist species in the coastal ocean. Nature 451:708–711 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
