Skip to main content
Interventional Neuroradiology logoLink to Interventional Neuroradiology
. 2004 Oct 22;9(Suppl 2):47–52. doi: 10.1177/15910199030090S206

Intracranial Dural Arteriovenous Shunts in Children

The Toronto Experience

MPS Souza 1, RA Willinsky 1,1, KG TerBrugge 2
PMCID: PMC3556664  PMID: 20591280

Introduction

Intracranial dural arteriovenous shunts (DAVS) are a group of different nosologic entities sharing a similar angioarchitecture1. In the pediatric recognized (table 1)2. The neonatal-type (NDAVS) is characterized by a malformation of the dural sinuses (figures 1A,B). The most common symptoms are related to increased intracranial pressure (ICP), mild cardiac failure and coagulation disorders. The reduction of venous outlets of the brain and additional overload into the sinuses lead to spontaneous thrombosis and consequent occlusion of all venous outlets as well as coagulation consumption syndromes.

Table 1.

Classification of DAVS in the pediatric population2 *

Type Name Description

1 Neonatal DAVS Giant dural lake with a slow communication
towards the other sinuses

2 Infantile DAVS Often multifocal, without sinus malformation, with
high-flow angiopathy on both the arterial and the
venous side (resulting in jugular bulb occlusion)

3 Adult DAVS Cavernous plexus or sigmoid sinus, sinuses may be partially
thrombosed

*Modified from Lasjaunias, PL. and K. ter Brugge, Vascular Diseases in Neonates. Infants and Children.
Interventional Neuroradiology Management, ed. PL. Lasjaunias.1997, Paris: Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Neonatal-type DAVS (Case 5) A) Right occipital arteriogram (AP view) shows fistula from the occipital artery into a large, malformed dural sinus. B) Venous phase of right occipital arteriogram (lateral view) shows an occluded right transverse sinus (arrowhead) and a stenotic left jugular bulb (arrowhead).

The prognosis is poor for midline malformations whereas lateral malformations may have good outcomes if treated3.

The infantile-type (IDAVS), often present within the first few years of life, is often multifocal and the natural history includes a progressive occlusive venopathy with sigmoid sinus and/or jugular bulb stenosis and subsequent occlusion (figures 2A,B). Mild and well tolerated congestive heart failure (CHF) is usually present, and the treatment can be postponed until the development of macrocrania or hydrodynamic disorders. At that point, treatment is mandatory to avoid mental retardation.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Infantile-type DAVS (Case 2). A) Left internal carotid arteriogram (lateral view) shows a multifocal DAVS (arrows) towards the superior sagittal sinus. B) Left external carotid arteriogram (lateral view) shows separate fistula into the superior sagittal sinus and transverse sinus (arrows).

Other neurological symptoms will also depend on whether the cavernous sinus has matured sufficiently to be able to capture the cortical venous system of the brain (natural by-pass to the venous outflow)1-3.

The adult-type (ADAVS) is similar in appearance and presentation to DAVS in the adult population. It can develop following thrombosis of the sinus wall or after traumatic injuries to the sinus. Its symptoms depend on the drainage patterns of the shunt and on the coexistence of venous thrombosis. Multifocal and extra-sinusal (duro-subdural, osteodural) ADAVS have not been described in children2,3. We report a series of 11 cases with DAVS, describe their treatment and report their outcomes.

Methods

From April 1986 to July 2003, 11 children (nine boys and two girls) were evaluated for DAVS in our institution (table 2). These patients ranged in age from 5 days to 12 years at the time of first evaluation.

Table 2.

Clinical and radiological findings in 11 children presenting with DAYS

Case
(No.)/Sex
Age at First
Treatment
Presentation Type Other Clinical
Information
Initial Brain
Imaging
DAVS
Location

1/M 2 years Cranial bruit
(right retromastoid
region)
3 MRI: normal Right sigmoid
sinus

2/M 5 years Right hemiparesis
(TIA*), headaches,
seizures
2 CT: large right
frontal DVA†,
intracerebral
haematoma
Multifocal
SSS‡

3/M 4 years CHF§, headaches,
seizures, left-sided neck
and cranial bruit,
macrocrania
2 Severe asthma CT: moderate
hydrocephalus
Multifocal left
superior
petrosal
sinus

4/F 12 years Bruit in the left ear,
headaches, occasional
right hand numbness
3 MRI: normal Left
transverse
sinus

5/M 1 year Headaches, epistaxis,
macrocrania
1 Prominent
orbital veins
MRI: moderate
hydrocephalus,
dystrophic brain
calcifications
Torcular

6/M 6 months Developmental delay
and left-sided facial
swelling, multiple left
ear haemorrhages
2 Heart murmur
caused by a patent
ductus arteriosus
MRI: mild brain
atrophy
Multifocal left
sphenoparietal
and inferior
petrosal sinuses

7/M 5 days CHF 1 MRI: mild
hydrocephalus
SSS

8/M 2 months CHF and left-
sided cranial bruit
2 on digoxine MRI: normal Multifocal
left transverse
sinus

9/M 7 years Right proptosis
and chemosis
3 Factor VIIA
deficiency, mild
head trauma 6
years before
MRI: normal,
prominent right
ophthalmic vein
Right cavernous
and inferior
petrosal sinuses

10/M 10 years Bilateral proptosis
(Right>Left)
and chemosis
3 Down’s syndrome Right ophthalmic
vein

11/F 3 years Cranial bruit
and headache
3 Right cheek
and neck
haemangioma
MRI: normal Right sigmoid
sinus

*TIA, Transient Ischaemic Attack; †DVA, Developmental Venous Anomaly;
‡SSS, Superior Sagittal Sinus; §CHF, Congestive Heart Failure.

A retrospective review of the patient’s charts and of all available imaging studies was performed. Their follow up was obtained in clinic consultations.

The treatment options were either transarterial embolisation alone, transvenous embolisa-tion alone or both routes combined. N-butyl-cyanoacrylate (NBCA) and Polyvinyl Alcohol (PVA) were the agents of choice in transarterial approaches, whereas coils were preferred in transvenous embolisations.

The embolisation was classified as partial when there was evidence of a residual arteriovenous shunt on angiography

Results

All patients treated (n = 10) had embolisation only One patient (Case 9), with a Factor VIIA deficiency, was not treated. There were 2 NADVS, 4 IDAVS and 5 ADAVS. The most common initial clinical presentations included bruit (n = 5), headaches (n = 5), neurological deficits (n = 3), CHF (n = 3), seizures (n = 2),proptosis (n = 2), and bleeding (n = 2). One patient with an adult-type DAVS (Case 9), had a history of trauma (table 3). CHF was detected immediately after birth in all three cases. The 2 cases of severe CHF occurred in the IDAVS. The third patient had mild CHF and a NADVS.

Table 3.

Treatment and Outcome in 10 children with DAYS*

Case # Embol†. Route #of
Embol.
Sessions
Embol.
Materials
Angiographic Outcome
(at last EmboL)
Clinical
Outcome
(time from 1st Embol.)

1 Combined‡ 2 NBCA§, Coils Cure Cured, no developmental
delay (7 years)

2 Combined 4 NBCA, Coils,
Stent, Balloon
Partial., recurrent
left internal jugular
stenosis
Controlled seizures,
mild developmental
delay, progressive
cortical atrophy
and dystrophic
calcifications (3 years)

3 Combined 2 NBCA, Coils Partial Death (1 month)

4 Transarterial 5 NBCA, PVA
_ _, Gelfoam
Partial Persistent symptoms
(8 years)

5 Transarterial 1 NBCA, PVA Partial Persistent symptoms,
developmental delay
(5 years)

6 Transarterial 4 NBCA, PVA Partial Relieved symptoms,
no developmental
delay (4 years)

7 Transarterial 1 NBCA Partial Persistent symptoms
(1 year)

8 Combined 3 NBCA, Coils Partial Persistent symptoms
(17 years)

10 Transarterial 1 NBCA Cure Cured (5 years)

11 Transarterial 1 NBCA Cure Cured (4 years)

*Case 9 excluded, not treated; †Embol., Embolization; ‡Combined,
Transarterial and Transvenous embolization; §NBCA, N-butylcyanoacrylate; _ _PVA, Polyvinyl Alcohol

On the initial brain imaging, normal brain parenchyma was present in 6 patients, whereas hydrocephalus was present in 3 cases (two cases of NADVS and one case of IDAVS). Multifocal DAVS were found in all cases of IDAVS. Three of the 4 multifocal DAVS involved either the transverse or the petrosal sinuses, and one involved the superior sagittal sinus. The sigmoid sinus was involved in 2 of the 5 cases of ADAVS.

A total of 24 sessions of embolisation were done in 10 patients. The number of sessions per patient ranged from 1 to 5 (mean = 2.4 per patient). All patients were treated using transarterial embolisation (NBCA, PVA or Gelfoam). Four patients were also treated using transvenous embolisation (coils, stent or balloon). No patient was treated using a direct puncture of the involved sinus.

Complete obliteration of the DAVS was achieved in 3 ADAVS. Two of them were treated in a single session.

There were no complications from the endovascular treatment, although developmental delay became evident after partial embolisation in one IDAVS (Case 2) and in one NDAVS (Case 5). One IDAVS (Case 3) died, 15 days after being discharged, due to respiratory complications and seizures. In 5 patients symptoms persisted after partial embolisation (follow-up from one to 17 years), although headaches, seizures and cardiac function were well controlled in all cases. Even though Case 6 had an excellent clinical and neurological recovery at 4 years, a longer follow-up is necessary to classify it as a cure, since the IDVAS was partially embolised.

Discussion

DAVS account for approximately 10% of all intracranial arteriovenous shunts in children4, are often multifocal and have a more aggressive clinical course compared to adults5,6. The NDAVS has a poor outcome due to the development of venous outlet obstruction and coagulation consumption syndromes2,3. In our two NDAVS, both affecting the superior sagittal sinus and the torcula, the outcome was not favourable, with persistent symptoms in both and developmental delay in one.

Four of our 11 patients had multifocal lesions, typical of the IDAVS. Two of the four had a poor outcome despite treatment (developmental delay in one and death in another). In the patient with persistent developmental delay there was mild brain atrophy at the time of diagnosis.

Two of these 4 patients with IDAVS had seizures, two had hydrocephalus and one had macrocrania. One of the patients who had developmental delay had angioplasty and stenting of a jugular bulb stenosis. Initially this improved his neurological signs and symptoms however the stenosis recurred and his neurological function deteriorated.

Repeat angioplasty resulted in only a temporary improvement in the venous congestive encephalopathy.

The ADAVS have the best prognosis. These often do not have brain symptoms at presentation7,9. In our five cases of ADAVS, the presentations included bruit in three and orbital congestion in two. Transarterial embolisation was curative in three of the four patients in this group.

Conclusions

The current treatment of choice for DAVS in children in endovascular therapy, which may be life saving in the setting of cardiac failure and curative in ADAVS. Treatment strategies should focus on the patient’s clinical status, and on the neurological prognosis.

The goal of treatment may be to arrest the neurological deterioration since angiographic cure may not be feasible. Venous approaches have to be considered with caution, since progressive venous occlusive phenomena may interfere with the drainage pattern of the healthy brain.

References

  • 1.Vilela P, Willinsky R, et al. Treatment of Intracranial Venous Occlusive Disease with Sigmoid Sinus Angioplasty and Stent Placement in a Case of Infantile Multifocal Dural Arteriovenous Shunts. Interventional Neuroradiology, 2001;7:51–60. doi: 10.1177/159101990100700108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Lasjaunias PL, terBrugge K. In: Vascular Diseases in Neonates. Infants and Children. Interventional Neuroradiology Management. Lasjaunias PL, editor. Paris: Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg; 1997. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.terBrugge KG. Neurointerventional procedures in the pediatric age group. Childs Nerv Syst. 1999;15:751–754. doi: 10.1007/s003810050465. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Lasjaunias P, Magufis A, et al. Anatomoclinical Aspects of Dural Arteriovenous Shunts in Children. Interventional Neuroradiology. 1996;2:179–191. doi: 10.1177/159101999600200303. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Kincaid PK, Duckwiler GR, et al. Dural arteriovenous fistula in children: endovascular treatment and outcomes in seven cases. Am J Neuroradiol. 2001;22:1217–1225. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Willinsky R, Goyal M, et al. Tortuous, engorged pial veins in intracranial dural arteriovenous fistulas: correlations with presentation, location, and MR findings in 122 patients. Am J Neuroradiol. 1999;20:1031–1036. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Carvalho KS, Garg BP. Cerebral venous thrombosis and venous malformations in children. Neurol Clin. 2002;20:1061–1077. doi: 10.1016/s0733-8619(02)00011-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Garcia-Monaco R, Rodesch G, et al. Multifocal Dural Arteriovenous Shunts in Children. Childs Nerv Syst. 1991;7:425–431. doi: 10.1007/BF00263183. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.deVeber G, Andrew M. Cerebral sinovenous thrombosis in children. N Engl J Med. 2001;345:417–423. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200108093450604. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Interventional Neuroradiology are provided here courtesy of SAGE Publications

RESOURCES