Single course of high dose dexamethasone is more effective than conventional prednisolone therapy in the treatment of primary newly diagnosed immune thrombocytopenia

Abstract

Introduction

Immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) is an immune disorder commonly presents as isolated thrombocytopenia. Generally corticosteroids are the main treatment of ITP. This study was designed to evaluate effectiveness of high dose dexamethasone comparing conventional corticosteroid therapy in the treatment of ITP.

Materials and methods

In a randomized prospective study, sixty adult patients with newly diagnosed primary symptomatic ITP (Platelet count < 20,000) were evaluated. Patients divided into two groups. In group A, thirty patients (mean age of 24.9 years) received Dexamethasone 40 mg/IV/daily for four days (10 mg/q6h); and then Prednisolone 1 ^mg/_kg/day/PO with rapid tapering of prednisolone (10 mg/week). From the other hand, in group B, thirty patients (mean age of 27.2 years) were treated with Prednisolone 1 ^mg/_kg/day/PO for four weeks, then the drug tapered weekly.

Results

All the patients in group A showed favorable response within the first seven days, 27 cases presented complete response (CR) and three cases revealed response (R). In group B, 11 cases had CR, 13 cases showed R and six cases had No response (NR). After three months, rates of CR were 80% and 23.3% in group A and B; respectively. Responses were 16.7% and 33.3%, NRs were 6.6% and 43.3% in group A and B; respectively (P < 0.0001). After 6 months, CR was 73.3% vs.16.7%, and R was 16.7% vs.36.7% and NR was 10% vs. 46.7% in group A and B; respectively (P < 0.0001). After 12 months, there was no change in response rate in group A, but in group B 53% were non responsive, 40% showed R (chronic ITP) and complete response was observed only in 6.7% (P < 0.0001). Three cases in group A and 12 cases in group B had needed splenectomy (P < 0.00002).

Conclusion

We showed that high dose dexamethasone is more effective than conventional steroid therapy in newly diagnosed ITP as initial treatment with less relapses and toxicities.

Introduction

The primary immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) is an isolated thrombocytopenia without exogenous etiologic factors and secondary causes ( [1,2]). Pathogenesis of ITP is due to platelet specific autoantibodies (most commonly IgG type) that bind to the platelet surface and cause clearance of them in spleen and liver ( [3,4]). Treatment in patients with ITP is dynamic and may alter in various situations. Patients with life threatening bleeding may need treatment with glucocorticoids, IVIG, platelet transfusion, plasmapheresis or even emergency splenectomy as initial treatment ( [5,6]). Initial response to conventional prednisolone therapy (1-2 ^mg/_kg/day) varies from 65% to 85%, but sustained response has been reported to be less than 25% ( [7]). Terminology used in this manuscript was according to an international working group in 2009 ( [8]). Use of high dose dexamethasone as initial treatment in ITP is controversial, however a number of studies have reported good response rate with minimal toxicity ( [9-11]). The aim of this perspective randomized trial was to evaluate effectiveness of single course of high dose dexamethasone comparing conventional prednisolone therapy in the treatment of newly diagnosed adult ITP patients.

Methods

In a single-blind randomized prospective study in Ali-Ebne-Abitaleb hospital in Zahedan, newly diagnosed adult patients with ITP were evaluated. Our inclusion criteria were: newly diagnosed primary ITP with platelet count less than 20,000/microliter. Bleeding tendency was graded as a previously definition (Table 1) ( [12]). The study protocol was approved by regional medical ethical committee (Approved No; 328, 2007.2.24) and all of the patients provided informed consent. Patients with previously treated ITP, diabetes, liver and kidney dysfunction, infections including HIV, HCV, and HBV, pregnancy and SLE or any acute illness were excluded. ITP was diagnosed according to clinical features, CBC, and bone marrow aspiration ( [13,14]). After initial clinical evaluation and performing CBC, bone marrow aspiration was done. Collagen vascular diseases or anti phospholipid antibody and other hematologic disorders were ruled out using appropriate tests. Patients randomly divided into two groups: group A received dexamethasone 40 mg/day/IV (10 mg/q6h) for four days and then prednisolone 1^mg/_kg/day/PO with 10 mg/week tapering and discontinuation after 6 weeks. Group B treated with prednisolone 1^mg/_kg/day for four weeks and then tapering 10 mg/week. Peripheral blood smear and CBC checked daily during hospitalization, then weekly for 6 weeks, and then monthly. Response to treatment was classified to complete response (CR) (PLT count >100,000), response (R) (PLT count ≥30,000) and no response (NR) (no rising in PLT or PLT count < 30,000 or symptomatic bleeding) [8]. Patients were followed for at least 12 months (ranged 12-48 months) (Table 2, 3). Toxicities were graded according to CTCAE criteria ( [12,15]).

Table 1.

Grade and type of bleeding symptom

Grade	Type of bleeding
0	Absent
1	Petechiae
2	Ecchymoses and/or dripping with moderate loss of blood
3	Major mucous hemorrhage with copious loss of blood without sequelae
4	Major mucous and/or parenchymal hemorrhage with copious loss of blood with sequelae and/or life-threatening

Table 2.

General characteristics of patients

	Group A	Group B	P value
Sex(F/M)	24/6	23/7	0.75
Mean age(Year)	24.9 (17.5 – 44)	27.2 (18 – 48.4)	0.49
Mean platelet count (μL)	13900 (3400 – 18000)	10400 (1500 – 16400)	0.56
Grade of bleeding (No.)
0	0	0
1	16	19
2	8	7
3	6	4
4	0	0

Table 3.

Comparison of outcomes in group A versus group B

		Group A No. (%)	Group B No. (%)	P value
One week				0.024
	CR	27 (90)	11 (36.7)
	R	3 (10)	13 (43.3)
	NR	0 (0)	6 (20)
Three months				< 0.0001
	CR	24 (80)	7 (23.3)
	R	5 (16.7)	10 (33.3)
	NR	2 (6.6)	13 (43.3)
Six months				< 0.0001
	CR	22 (73.3)	5 (16.6)
	R	5 (16.6)	11 (36.7.3)
	NR	3 (10)	14 (46.7)
One year				< 0.0001
	CR	22 (73.3)	2 (6.6)
	R	5 (16.6)	12 (40)
	NR	3 (10)	16 (53.3)
Splenectomy		3 (10)	12 (40)	< 0.0002

Statistical analysis: Data analysis was performed using SPSS version 16 (SPSS Inc, Chicago, IL, USA). Independent T test was used for comparison of continuous variables. Differences in the distribution of variables between groups were analyzed by the X² or Fisher exact test. P < 0.05 was regarded as significant.

Results

Sixty patients completed the study and came for weekly follow up visits and laboratory evaluations. These consecutive patients randomly assigned to group A and B. There was no significant difference between mean age (P = 0.49), sex (P = 0.75) and platelet count (P = 0.56) of the two groups (Table 2).

Seven days after initiation of treatment protocol, in group A, CR and R were observed in 27 and three patients, respectively. In group B, we showed CR in 11 cases, R in 13 cases and NR in six cases. After three months, in group A, two patients were NR, five cases showed R and 23 cases revealed CR and loss of CR and R occurred in this period. In group B, NR, R and CR were observed in 13, 10 and seven patients, respectively (P < 0.0001). After 6 months, in group A versus group B, the number of patients with NR, R and CR were three versus 14, five versus 11 and 22 versus five (P < 0.0001). One year after the initial treatment, there were no further changes in group A; however, in group B, number of NR cases increased to 16, two cases showed CR and the remaining cases were in R group (P < 0.0001). Splenectomy as a second line treatment was performed for three cases in A group and for 12 cases in group B (P < 0.00002) (Table 3).

Overall, treatment related toxicities (Table 4) were minimal. Adverse reactions in group B were more common than group A. In group A, treatment related toxicities were weight gain in five cases (17.3%) (All grade 1), abnormal glucose level (grade 2 toxicity) needed transient treatment in one case, gastrointestinal distress in two cases (one case in grade 2 and another in grade three toxicity) and grade one hypertension in one case. In group B, the most common toxicities were weight gain in 13 cases (43.3%) with grade one toxicity, hypertension in three cases (10%), (one case in grade 2 and two cases in grade 1 toxicity), abnormal glucose level needed transient treatment in five cases (16.5%) (three in grade 2 and two in grade one of toxicity), and gastrointestinal toxicity in seven (23.3%) patients, (five in grade 2 and two in grade 3 of toxicity).

Table 4.

Treatment related toxicity

	Group A No. (%)	Group B No. (%)
Weight gain	5(17.3)	13(43.3)
	Grade of toxicity : 1	Grade of toxicity : 1
Glucose intolerance	1(3.3)	5(16.5)
	Grade of toxicity : 2	Grade of toxicity :
		3 cases grade : 2
		2 cases grade : 1
Hypertension	1(3.3)	3(10)
	Grade of toxicity : 1	Grade of toxicity :
		One case grade : 2
		2 cases grade 1
Gastrointestinal distress	2(6.6)	7(23.3)
	Grade of toxicity : 1	Grade of toxicity : 1
	1 case grade 2	5 cases: grade 2
	1 case grade 3	2 cases : grade 3

Discussion

The standard treatment of ITP is corticosteroid therapy, mainly prednisolone at 1^mg/_kg for four weeks and then tapering ( [16]). Although response rate to this therapeutic regimen has been reported 50-60%, durability is low (10-25%) ( [7,17]).Our results showed that single course of high dose dexamethasone regimen is more effective than conventional therapy as an initial treatment for ITP patients.

Cheng and colleagues demonstrated that 85% of all cases received high dose dexamethasone had initial response, while half of them had sustained response. Other cases experienced relapse disease (PLT < 30,000). However, 50% of these cases only needed 10 mg/day prednisolone to continue response after second course of high dose dexamethasone and other cases needed more than 10 mg/day plus further treatment including splenectomy, IVIG, Anti D, danazol, vina alkaloid, and Cyclosporine. In our study initial response was similar to Cheng study, but we showed higher sustained and durable response and lower relapse rate (16.6% vs. 50%). This difference may be due to younger age of our patients and continuation of prednisolone for at least four weeks. The later probable reason may be supported by this fact that in cheng study 50% of relapses responded to 10 mg prednisolone ( [9]).

In another study Borst and coworkers treated 36 cases with high dose dexamethasone; 50% as first line therapy and 50% as second line. In first line group 59% had durable response (CR + PR) for 2-31 months, 28% had transient response with immediate relapse after cessation of high dose dexamethasone and 11% had no response ( [18]). In second line group 25% had durable response (CR + PR) for 4 – 54 months, 61% had transient response and 11% had no response. In both groups 30.5% of patients underwent splenectomy. In this study 44% had no evidence of any side effect, 13.8% had severe toxicity and refused this modality of treatment.

In 2007 Mazzucconi and colleagues conducted two studies: In a mono-center study 37 adult patients treated with 4-6 cycles of high dose dexamethasone every 28 days. Response rate was 89.2% (CR :62.2%, PR: 21.6%, MR: 5.4%, and NR in 10.8%). In this study, relapse rate and durable response were 24.2% and 75%, respectively. Sustained response was similar to our study (67.6% vs. 75%). Thirty three cases showed a favorable response to dexamethasone therapy and relapse occurred in eight cases which were higher than our ones. In the Multicenter study response rate was 85.6% (CR 64.5%; PR 20%; MR 1.1% and NR14.4%). With administration of every other course of high dose dexamethasone therapy, response rate increased (69.5%, 75.5%, 89%). The quality of response in younger patients was more favorable than older patients (P = 0.039) and relapse rate was lower (P = 0.01). Age was the most important factor for response and relapse in Mazzucconi study. After 6.5 months of treatment, relapse rate was 13% among responders. Durable response without any treatment after 8 months follow up was 74.4% ( [13]).

Compared to multicenter results, our patients were adults and duration of follow up was longer (12-48 vs. 3-24 months). Durable response was similar in both studies; however CR was lower in multicenter study (64.5% vs. 80%) and relapse rate was higher (22% vs. 16.6%).

The younger mean age of our patients and continuation of glucocorticoid after cessation of dexamethasone, may explain more favorable response especially higher durable response in our study.

The favorable and better outcome of current study comparing Mazzucconi and Cheng studies were: young age of our patients and continuation of corticosteroid administration after cessation of high dose dexamehasone. Continuation of prednisolone may be effective in sustained blockade of clearance system and inhibition of antibody synthesis and deposition ( [19-22]).

The strengths of our study were: the first randomized prospective study about comparison between high dose dexamethasone and conventional prednisolone therapy, being all cases in severe disease according to PLT count and doing close follow up visits. Our limitations were: Age distribution (excluding childhood and older cases), and single-blind study (instead of double-blind), and limited number of patients (only 30 cases in every groups).

Conclusion

Comparing conventional treatment, our study showed more effectiveness of single course of high dose dexamethasone with continuation and rapid tapering of prednisolone as an initial treatment for primary newly diagnosed immune thrombocytopenia with minimal and acceptable side effects. We recommend further head to head studies to evaluate effectiveness of this regimen comparing repeated cycles of dexamethasone as sole treatment.

Competing interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interest.

Author's contribution

All of the authors had the same contribution in article.

Acknowledgements

We wish to thank the Hematology Oncology and stem cell research center of Tehran medical university especially of Professor Ghavamzadeh and Dr Alimoghaddam.