Skip to main content
Emerging Infectious Diseases logoLink to Emerging Infectious Diseases
letter
. 2013 Jan;19(1):154–155. doi: 10.3201/eid1901.120764

Schmallenberg Virus in Central Nervous System of Ruminants

Kerstin Hahn 1,2,3, Andre Habierski 1,2,3, Vanessa Herder 1,2,3, Peter Wohlsein 1,2,3, Martin Peters 1,2,3, Florian Hansmann 1,2,3, Wolfgang Baumgärtner 1,2,3,
PMCID: PMC3557993  PMID: 23260872

To the Editor: In 2011, a new virus spread throughout ruminant populations in the Netherlands, Germany, and other European countries (1). Infected dairy cattle exhibited fever, reduced milk yield, loss of appetite, and diarrhea. Weeks after these signs appeared, epidemic abortions; births of malformed or stillborn animals; and perinatal deaths of calves, lambs, and goat kids were reported. Metagenomic analysis identified a novel orthobunyavirus (family Bunyaviridae), termed Schmallenberg virus (SBV), which is closely related to Akabane and Shamonda viruses (1). These arthropod-borne viruses are well-recognized ruminant pathogens in Africa, Asia, and Oceania; fetal infection is associated with an arthrogryposis–hydranencephaly syndrome.

Previous reports about SBV have addressed clinical signs (2), serologic findings (3), pathologic findings (4), and SBV RNA distribution in organs of malformed calves (5) detected by real-time quantitative reverse transcription PCR (qRT-PCR). However, pathogenesis and viral cell tropism are largely unknown. Therefore, our aims were to establish an in situ hybridization method (ISH) to detect SBV mRNA, to evaluate the usefulness of this method as a complementary diagnostic tool, and to further analyze SBV pathogenesis.

The in situ probe was generated according to established protocols (6). The SBV qRT-PCR product and primers used for diagnostics (5) were used to amplify an 88-bp segment of the nucleoprotein, encoded by the small segment of the SBV genome. The amplicon was cloned into a pCR4-TOPO vector (Invitrogen, Darmstadt, Germany) and sequenced. For generation of a digoxigenin-labeled antisense probe to detect viral mRNA, we used M13 reverse and SBV-S-469R primers (5). Specificity of the probe was ensured by distinct ISH signals in the brains of SBV-positive (as determined by qRT-PCR) animals (6). No reaction was detected in SBV-negative (as determined by qRT-PCR) goats, sheep, and calves; in ruminants with various non–SBV-associated nervous system lesions; or in the brain of a mouse that was experimentally infected with Akabane virus.

Thereafter, we investigated SBV mRNA distribution in the central nervous system (CNS) of 82 naturally infected ruminants (46 lambs, 2 goat kids, and 34 calves), all of which had previously been found by qRT-PCR to be positive for SBV. In addition, ISH was used to examine the following tissues from 10 of these animals (4 lambs, 1 goat kid, and 5 calves): placenta, muscle, eye, heart, aorta, lung, trachea, liver, kidney, spleen, small and large intestine, mesenteric and pulmonary lymph nodes, thymus, adrenal gland, testis, and uterus.

SBV mRNA was found in varying amounts, predominantly in neurons (Figure) of the cerebrum, cerebellum, brain stem, medulla oblongata, and spinal cord of 7 lambs, 1 goat kid, and 2 calves. Randomly distributed clusters of SBV-positive neurons were frequently found in small ruminants, whereas only single positive cells were found in both calves. SBV mRNA was not found in any peripheral organ. The Technical Appendix provides an overview of ISH results in relation to malformations and inflammatory CNS lesions. Histologic examination identified encephalitis, characterized by lymphohistiocytic, perivascular cuffs, in 11 (9 lambs, 1 goat kid, and 1 calf) of the 82 animals. Among animals that were positive according to ISH, all small ruminants showed inflammation, whereas both calves lacked inflammatory changes.

Figure.

Figure

In situ detection by using Nomarski differential interference contrast microscopy of Schmallenberg virus mRNA in neurons in the medulla of a neonatal sheep for which Schmallenberg virus infection was confirmed by real-time quantitative reverse transcription PCR. Scale bar = 100 μm.

The most frequent macroscopic lesions or conditions in animals that were SBV positive by qRT-PCR, especially calves, were arthrogryposis, brachygnathia inferior, torticollis, kyphosis, lordosis, scoliosis, and muscle hypoplasia (especially in calves) (4). The predominant CNS lesions or conditions were cerebellar and cerebral hypoplasia, hydranencephaly, porencephaly, hydrocephalus, and micromyelia. Among the 8 small ruminants that were SBV positive by ISH, hydrocephalus was found in 5, cerebellar hypoplasia in 5, hydranencephaly in 1, and arthrogryposis in 6. For the 2 calves that were SBV positive, micromyelia and arthrogryposis were found in both and cerebellar hypoplasia in 1.

This study indicates that neurons are the predominant target in SBV-infected neonates. Surprisingly, only 10 of 82 ruminants were positive for SBV by qRT-PCR and ISH. This discrepancy could result from low SBV mRNA copy numbers per cell, which are detectable by qRT-PCR but not ISH, and/or from reduced viral load in individual cells because of the long time between assumed infection in early gestation and time of examination after birth (≈17 weeks in sheep and 27 weeks in calves). The latter explanation is indicated by the high incidence of malformations (7) typical for teratogenic insults and might especially apply to calves. Detection of CNS inflammation in all small ruminants that were SBV positive according to ISH indicates a cause-and-effect association between high SBV mRNA copy numbers per cell and lymphohistiocytic immune response. Furthermore, low numbers of infected cells and/or reduced replication as assumed for animals that were positive by qRT-PCR but negative by ISH might explain the absence of inflammation in the calf brains. The 3 tested animals in which inflammation was found but that were SBV negative by ISH could represent an advanced resolving lesion after viral clearance or reduction. In situ detection of SBV mRNA represents a suitable way to study SBV pathogenesis, especially in the active phase of infection, and might enable identification of SBV as the causative agent in cases of CNS inflammation of unknown etiology.

Technical Appendix

Absolute numbers and percentages of animals that were positive for Schmallenberg virus according to in situ hybridization in relation to central nervous system inflammation and occurrence of skeletal and brain malformations. Data refer to absolute numbers of 82 small and large ruminants that were positive for Schmallenberg virus by real-time quantitative reverse transcription PCR.

12-0764-Techapp-s1.pdf (91.2KB, pdf)

Acknowledgments

We thank Takafumi Hamaoka for providing the brain samples of the Akabane virus–infected mouse and Danuta Waschke, Bettina Buck, Caroline Schütz, and Claudia Herrmann for excellent technical assistance.

Suggested citation for this article: Hahn K, Habierski A, Herder V, Wohlsein P, Peters M, Hansmann F, et al. Schmallenberg virus in central nervous system of ruminants. Emerg Infect Dis [serial on the Internet]. 2013 Jan [date cited]. http://dx.doi.org/10.3201/eid1901.120764

1

These authors contributed equally to this article.

References

  • 1.Hoffmann B, Scheuch M, Höper D, Jungblut R, Holsteg M, Schirrmeier H, et al. Novel orthobunyavirus in cattle, Europe, 2011. Emerg Infect Dis. 2012;18:469–72 10.3201/eid1803.111905 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Gariglinany M-M, Hoffmann B, Dive M, Sartelet A, Bayrou C, Cassart D, et al. Schmallenberg virus in calf born at term with porencephaly, Belgium. Emerg Infect Dis. 2012;18:1005–6. 10.3201/eid1806.120104 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 3.Elbers AR, Loeffen WL, Quak S, de Boer-Luijtze E, van der Spek AN, Bouwstra R, et al. Seroprevalence of Schmallenberg virus antibodies among dairy cattle, the Netherlands, winter 2011–2012. Emerg Infect Dis. . Epub 2012 May 10.3201/eid1807.120323 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Herder V, Wohlsein P, Peters M, Hansmann F, Baumgärtner W. Salient lesions in domestic ruminants infected with the emerging so-called Schmallenberg virus in Germany. Vet Pathol. 2012;49:588–91 10.1177/0300985812447831 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Bilk S, Schulze C, Fischer M, Beer M, Hlinak A, Hoffmann B. Organ distribution of Schmallenberg virus RNA in malformed newborns. Vet Microbiol. . Epub 2012 March 30 10.1016/j.vetmic.2012.03.035 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Gröters S, Alldinger S, Baumgärtner W. Up-regulation of mRNA for matrix metalloproteinases-9 and -14 in advanced lesions of demyelinating canine distemper leukoencephalitis. Acta Neuropathol. 2005;110:369–82 10.1007/s00401-005-1055-z [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Gibbens N. Prevention of Schmallenberg virus. Vet Rec. 2012;170:130 10.1136/vr.e816 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Technical Appendix

Absolute numbers and percentages of animals that were positive for Schmallenberg virus according to in situ hybridization in relation to central nervous system inflammation and occurrence of skeletal and brain malformations. Data refer to absolute numbers of 82 small and large ruminants that were positive for Schmallenberg virus by real-time quantitative reverse transcription PCR.

12-0764-Techapp-s1.pdf (91.2KB, pdf)

Articles from Emerging Infectious Diseases are provided here courtesy of Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

RESOURCES