Skip to main content
Avicenna Journal of Medical Biotechnology logoLink to Avicenna Journal of Medical Biotechnology
. 2010 Jul-Sep;2(3):137–143.

In Silico Design and Selection of Anti-fungal AmB-polyene-analog Lead Molecules by Virtual Screening Method

Marziyeh Ferdosiyan 1, Soroush Sardari 2,*
PMCID: PMC3558159  PMID: 23408489

Abstract

A major group of drugs that have been approved for the therapy of systemic fungal infections are polyene antibiotics. Amphotericin B (AmB), one of the polyene antibiotics, has been used to treat serious systemic fungal infections by binding to sterols such as ergosterol in fungal cells membrane, and is believed to form pores in the membrane and create a transmembrane ion-channel. Since all eukaryotic cells contain sterols, using AmB can cause toxicity in mammalian cells; this is the most serious unwanted side effect. Therefore, there is still a need to develop suitable antifungal compounds to be entered in the drug development pipeline. In this study, we report the screening of various compounds from the Enhanced NCI database against ergosterol and cholesterol as receptors. The strategy employed is divided into two categories, screening and docking, respectively. Screening was performed using structure search based on AmB and molecular constraints to filter compounds with physico-chemical properties similar to the polyene macrolid antibiotics. The selected compounds were docked and scored to identify structurally novel ligands that make similar interactions to AmB. Our screening approach identified several molecules with high ranking criteria mentioned above. Among these compounds, two molecules, NSC 89270 and NSC 62792 were tested for their bioactivity against three fungal strains using broth microdilution assay that presented to have moderate antifungal activity against tested fungi. Thus, they could be possible lead compounds that grant further research on them to improve their potency and compare their mechanism of action in comparison to AmB.

Keywords: Amphotericin B, Antifungal agents, Cholesterol, Ergosterol

Introduction

Different kinds of mycoses, especially invasive, have increased dramatically in the past decades in relation to AIDS, cancer chemotherapy agents, transplant recipients and other immunosuppressed individuals (13).

Part of the difficulty in treating fungal infection is the lack of a number of effective antifungal drugs (4). Marked differences were observed between mammalian membranes and fungal cell membranes. Mammalian membranes contain cholesterol and fungal cell membranes contain ergosterol as their principal steroid, whilst bacterial membranes do not normally contain steroids (5).

Biological action of polyene antifungal drugs is related to the cell membrane sterols (68). Amphotericin B (AmB), one of the polyene macrolide antibiotics which have been acted by binding to sterols such as ergosterol in fungal cells membrane, and are believed to form hydrophilic pores in the membrane and create a transmembrane ion-channel (9, 10).

AmB is the most commonly used drug for many invasive or life-threatening mycoses. This is because it has the broadest spectrum of activity of any available antifungal agent and very rare induction fungal resistance. But, it is somewhat toxic, because it also has high affinity for cholesterol-containing membranes, and its use in clinical treatment is limited to rather severe cases (11, 12).

While the azoles are much less toxic than amphotericin B, therapeutic failure and the emergence of azole resistance have limited their utility (13). The side effects of these drugs make the need for the necessity of new improved drugs. Hence, we try to find the new suitable analogues of AmB, by Virtual screening, which could be possible lead molecules with less toxicity. Traditional synthesis of a series of new compounds utilizing combinatorial chemistry and high-throughput screening can be carried out at high cost and also is time consuming. On the other hand, Virtual screening small molecule databases is now established as an effective paradigm for filtering compounds for drug discovery process (14, 15).

Virtual screening can apply docking and scoring of each compound from a dataset using a target receptor. Docking various ligands to target of interest followed by scoring to determine the affinity of binding and to reveal the strength of interaction has become increasingly important in the context of drug discovery. In general, it is important to understand the way the intermolecular interaction occurs by visualizing the docked positions of high-scoring compounds because many ligands are docked in different directions and may not fit in the manner of interactions that are known to be important for the target receptor (16, 17). Such studies become more difficult as the size of the dataset increases and CPU consumption and computer power become demanding.

Therefore, an alternative approach is to eliminate unpromising compounds before docking by restricting the dataset, by filtering the dataset based on similar features and appropriate properties. Using filters that reduce the number of possible interacting molecules can be highly effective in reducing the dataset to be docked (18, 19). In this study, we report screening a library of compounds from Enhanced NCI database against ergosterol, considered the ligand for AmB, by utilizing a fast, exhaustive docking application.

Materials and Methods

Tools and materials used

For our present study, we used Enhanced NCI database, ChemAxon and Hex (version 5.1, 2008) servers. ChemAxon is developed to help chemists quickly and easily draw molecules, calculate physico-chemical properties based on structure, and it can convert name to structure and vice versa. Hex is an Interactive Molecular Graphics Program for calculating and displaying feasible docking modes of receptor-Ligand. Assuming the ligand is rigid, and it can superpose pairs of molecules using only knowledge of their 3D shapes (20). It uses Spherical Polar Fourier (SPF) correlations to accelerate the search for candidate low-energy conformation (21).

Enhanced NCI database is a Web-based service with different kinds of output features and links to other services for continued processing. Molecules in Enhanced NCI database are annotated by properties that include molecular weight, calculated LogP, number of hydrogen-bond donors, hydrogen-bond acceptors and number of rotatable bonds, complexity, chiral centers, chiral double bonds (E/Z isomerism), net charge, drug likeness and PASS predictions. Biological activities of about 250,000 compounds in the Enhanced NCI Database are predicted by “PASS” prediction. This program predicts biological activity spectrum of compound based on its structural formula (22).

Screening

At first, AmB (Figure 1), one of the polyene macrolid antibiotics that is approved by FDA, was taken as an appropriate candidate to acquire new lead compounds based on structure-property relationship (SAR). Then, the Enhanced NCI database was screened for compounds similar to AmB structural features (structure based search) and by providing molecular constraints (property based search) according to properties of polyene macrolid antibiotics. The degree of similarity is dictated by the Tanimoto Index above 70% that given a numerical score for every compound to define the output ranking.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Structure of AmB

The physico-chemical properties such as log P value, H-bond donors, H-bond acceptors, topological polar surface and rotational bonds for about 60 polyene macrolid antibiotics were calculated using the ADME/ Tox filter server (23). Afterwards, using ChemAxon the structural of these obtained compounds that had less molecular complexity compared to AmB were sketched and converted to 3D structure. Receptors bound ligand AmB were docked to obtain the docked pose. Therefore, the 3D structure of these compounds and receptors (ergosterol and cholesterol) complexes were identified via docking and their relative stabilities were evaluated using molecular dynamics and their binding affinities, using free energy simulations. The default parameters used for the docking process. Ultimately best compounds were selected to examine their antifungal activities.

Antifungal assays

For determination of MICs of the intended compounds, approved reference method M27-A has been published by the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards (NCCLS) for testing with yeasts. And proposed reference method M38-P is being developed for filamentous fungi (24, 25).

Two strains of yeast, Candida albicans (C. albicans) (ATCC10231) and Saccharomyces cervisiae (S. cervisiae) (PTCC 5052), one strain of filamentous Aspergillus niger (A. niger) (A420) were chosen to represent the effect of these intended compounds by using broth microdilution assay.

All strains were grown on Sabouraud glucose agar (SAB) growth media for 24–48 hr at 35 °C. Yeast inocula were prepared in sterile 0.9% NaCl solution and to make the inoculum of A. niger, the spores were dispersed in 0.1% solution of Tween 20. The turbidity of the yeast and filamentous suspensions were adjusted respectively to 75–77% and 80–82% transmittance (T) by using a spectrophotometer at 530 nm. At last all inoculum suspensions were diluted (1:1000 for yeasts and 1:50 for filamentous) in Sabouraud maltose broth medium (SMB) to obtain the final test inoculum twice.

All tested compounds were dissolved in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) to a concentration of 10 mg/ml. Also, the concentration of 3.2 mg/ml of the antifungal agent amphotericin B (Sigma, Germany) in dimethyl sulf-oxide was applied as medium positive control. NSC 89270 was purchased from Carbo-synth (Compton Berkshire, UK) and NSC 62792 was from Sigma-Aldrich (Czech Rep).

Serial dilution of these stock solutions on SMB was prepared in microdilution wells, 100 µl of the diluted suspension were added to 100 µl of the diluted solutions to obtain the desired starting concentration for the experiments. Addition of culture media and inoculum to the wells of these plates diluted the final tested compounds and amphotericin B concentrations respectively at 1000-1.9 and 32-0.06 µg/ml.

Microdilution trays were incubated at 35°C and examined after 24–48 hr to determine MIC (minimum inhibitory concentration) values.

Results

We searched the Enhanced NCI database using structural features that are similar to AmB and then the results were restricted based on the computed properties ranges of the polyene macrolid antibiotics that are given in Table 1.

Table 1.

Minimum to maximum ranges of about 60 polyene macrolid antibiotic properties

Properties log p-value H bond Donor H bond Acceptor Rotational Bonds Topological Polar Surface Complexity
Min. to Max. Ranges −1.3 to 5.5 3 to 24 8 to 40 1 to 21 147 to 719 927 to 4140

The number of similarity identified hits was 500 and among those, about 200 compounds had less molecular complexity compared to AmB. We docked these 200 compounds using Hex and evaluated binding compatibility with the receptors based on docked energy (in kcal/ mol).

The docking tool generated 100 conformers for each docked molecule. By the virtual screening technique employed in this study, we identified specific diverse ligands that bind in a comparable manner to AmB binding for ergosterol and the nearest interaction energy values with ergosterol in comparison to AmB. The final screening based on dock and property filter approach identified ten compounds from the Enhanced NCI database for compatible binding with ergosterol. AmB on docking with ergosterol and cholesterol produced energy values of −170.9 and −186.0, respectively. Also, the “PASS” predicted for antifungal activity was about 0.889. The binding affinities between these compounds and ergosterol/ cholesterol and their physico-chemical properties are tabulated in Table 2. Their “PASS” predicted antifungal activities are also shown in Table 2.

Table 2.

Interaction parameters of the selected compounds with ergosterol and cholesterol and their predicted antifungal activities

NSC Number E-Value (kJ/mol) log p value H bond Donor H bond Acceptor Rotational Bonds Topological Polar Surface Complexity PASS Predict

Ergosterol Cholesterol
87916 −167 −185.9 1.2 5 8 10 147 639 0.373
183502 −162.8 −175 3.53 4 6 15 110 479 0.341
177379 −162.2 −145.2 −0.1 5 7 18 141 468 0.549
94669 −154 −148.1 4 0 8 8 85.4 611 0.231
87915 −150.8 −141.3 0.8 6 9 10 167 667 0.381
174187 −150.1 −140.1 −3.3 5 10 5 162 547 0.637
89270 −139.8 −139.7 −0.7 5 8 3 143 353 0.413
103055 −137.7 −123.8 −0.3 4 8 4 140 442 0.449
62792 −133.8 −131.1 7.4 1 1 5 20.2 678 0.322
82037 −130.5 −135.3 −0.4 5 8 8 147 514 0.393

The structures of these compounds are presented in Figure 2. Among them, NSC 89270 and NSC 62792 were novel molecules and available to purchase. Interaction of the NSC 89270 and AmB ligand molecules with the receptors is presented in Figure 3. They were tested against mentioned fungal strains. Antifungal activities of the two compounds were compared with AmB and are shown in Table 3. We reported the results against C. albicans (ATCC10231), S. cervisiae (PTCC 5052) and A. niger (A420) isolates, which they were semi-susceptible.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Compound structures were obtained from virtual screening

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Interaction of compounds with ergosterol; A) NSC 89270-ergosterol and B) AmB-ergosterol

Table 3.

In vitro activities of NSC 89270, NSC 62792 and amphotericin B against two strains of yeast and one strain of filamentous fungi after 48 hr

Compound MIC (µg/ml)

C.albicans S.cervisiae A.niger
NSC 89270 125 125 250
NSC 62792 500 500 500
AmB 1 0.25–0.5 2

Highly-susceptible: MICs ≤8 µg/ml

Susceptible: 8< MICs <100 µg/ml

Semi-susceptible: MICs 100 < MICs < 1000 µg/ml

Discussion

Virtual screening methods are routinely and extensively used to reduce cost and time in the drug discovery process. It has been clearly demonstrated that the approach utilized in this study is successful in finding novel antifungal lead compounds, based on structural and functional profile of AmB, from the Enhanced NCI database. The applied approach has the capacity to screen among compound for certain mechanism of action.

Therefore, these predictions could help us to select the appropriate hits. It is important to note these compounds have rather less complexity than AmB, that may cause less toxicity and better drug likeness, maintaining flexibility in the pharmacokinetics factors and further formulation and administration in a desired route in the process of development. However, their present profile and potency may further necessitate changing their structure or considering their analogs. The selection approach was based on the best of the matched properties and dock results.

Thus, all properties of these compounds in Table 2 are not located in definition ranges for polyene antibiotics. Based on Tables 1 and 2, NSC 89270 has more similar properties to polyene macrolid antibiotics than NSC 62792. Also, its in vitro activity represented better antifungal activity. This characteristic has been referred to as activity-property relationship principle. NSC 62792 (Ergocalciferol) increases intestinal absorption and also stimulates renal reabsorption of calcium and phosphate. But no studies have been done on clinical application of NSC 89270.

Also, we found compounds such as NSC 177379 and NSC 174187 that their antifungal activities were previously studied and proved to be active, that further validates our approach in finding the bioactive hits. NSC 177379 (Myriocin) is a new antifungal antibiotic from Myriococcum albomyces (26, 27). NSC 174187 is also called for simmondsin, produce a clear dose-response effect on food intake and body weight and show a strong insecticidal activity against the third instar larvae of Spodoptera littoralis Boisduval (S. littoralis) and antifeedant activity against S. littoralis in a concentration-dependent manner (28). In addition, these compounds show moderate antifungal activity against four plant pathogenic fungi.

Conclusion

Overall, our selection algorithm is efficient because speeds up the initial lead compounds identification. Further researches on these lead compounds provide an insight into discovery of stronger new antifungal compounds with better profile of activity. In future research work on properties of these compounds can be carried out in order to prove the effect of these compounds on the ergosterol present in the fungal cell membrane. In order to prove the effect of the compounds on the ergosterol present in the fungal cell membrane, the reversal agent such as ergosterol is to be tested for ability to affect the membrane dependant activity.

Acknowledgement

The first author wishes to thank Drug Design and Bioinformatics Unit that all the study and experiments were carried out in it and for providing the supports.

References

  • 1.García-Ruiz JC, Amutio E, Pontón J. Invasive fungal infection in immunocompromised patients. Rev Iberoam Micol. 2004;21(2):55–62. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Walsh TJ, Groll A, Hiemenz J, Fleming R, Roilides E, Anaissie E. Infections due to emerging and uncommon medically important fungal pathogens. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2004;10(1):48–66. doi: 10.1111/j.1470-9465.2004.00839.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Giusiano G, Mangiaterra M, Rojas F, Gámez V. Azole resistance in neonatal intensive care units in Argentina. J Chemother. 2005;17(3):347–350. doi: 10.1179/joc.2005.17.3.347. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Dismukes WE. Introduction to antifungal drugs. Clin Infect Dis. 2000;30(4):653–657. doi: 10.1086/313748. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.James PR, Rawlings BJ. Probing the mechanism of action of amphotericin B. Bioorg Med Chem Lett. 1996;6(5):505–508. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Hammond SM. Biological activity of polyene antibiotics. In: Ellis GP, West GB, editors. Progress in medicinal chemistry 14. Amsterdam: Elsevier, North Holland publishing company; 1977. pp. 105–283. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Betina V, Barathova H, Barath Z, Nemec P. Effects of polyene antibiotics on plant, fungal and animal cell membranes. Biologia. 1969;24(6):450–454. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Zotchev SB. Polyene macrolide antibiotics and their applications in human therapy. Curr Med Chem. 2003;10(3):211–223. doi: 10.2174/0929867033368448. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Baginski M, Sternal K, Czub J, Borowski E. Molecular modelling of membrane activity of amphotericin B a polyene macrolide antifungal antibiotic. Acta Biochimica Polonica. 2005;52(3):655–658. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Resat H, Baginski M. Ion passage pathways and thermodynamics of the amphotericin B membrane channel. Eur Biophys J. 2002;31(4):294–305. doi: 10.1007/s00249-002-0214-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Gallis HA, Drew RH, Pickard WW. Amphotericin B: 30 years of clinical experience. Rew Infect Dis. 1990;12(2):308–329. doi: 10.1093/clinids/12.2.308. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Borowski E. Novel approaches in the rational design of antifungal agents of low toxicity. Il Farmaco. 2000;55(3):206–208. doi: 10.1016/s0014-827x(00)00024-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Cameron ML, Schell WA, Bruch SJ, Bartlett A, Waskin HA, Perfect JR. Correlation of in vitro fluconazole resistance of Candida isolates in relation to therapy and symptoms in individuals sero-positive for human immunodeficiency virus type 1. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1993;37(11):2449–2453. doi: 10.1128/aac.37.11.2449. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Charifson PS, Walters WP. Filtering databases and chemical libraries. J Comput Aided Mol Des. 2002;16(5-6):311–323. doi: 10.1023/a:1020829519597. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Wilton D, Willett P, Lawson K, Mullier G. Comparison of ranking methods for virtual screening in lead-discovery programs. J Chem Inf Comput Sci. 2003;43(2):469–474. doi: 10.1021/ci025586i. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Downs GM, Willett P, Fisanick W. Similarity searching and clustering of chemical structure databases using molecular property data. J Chem Inf Comput Sci. 1994;34(5):1094–1102. [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Halperin I, Ma B, Wolfson H, Nussinov R. Principles of docking: an overview of search algorithms and a guide to scoring functions. Proteins. 2002;47(4):409–443. doi: 10.1002/prot.10115. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Sheridan RP, Kearsley SK. Why do we need so many chemical similarity search methods? Drug Discov Today. 2002;7(17):903–911. doi: 10.1016/s1359-6446(02)02411-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Taylor RD, Jewsbury PJ. A review of protein-small molecule docking methods. J Comput Aided Mol Des. 2002;16(3):151–166. doi: 10.1023/a:1020155510718. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Ritchie DW. Evaluation of protein docking predictions using Hex 3.1 in CAPRI rounds 1 and 2. Proteins. 2003;52(1):98–106. doi: 10.1002/prot.10379. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Ritchie DW, Kemp GJL. Protein docking using spherical polar fourier correlations. Proteins. 2000;39(2):178–194. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Poroikov V, Filimonov D, Ihlenfeldt WD, Gloriozova T, Lagunin A, Borodina Y, et al. PASS biological activity spectrum predictions in the enhanced Open NCI Database Browser. J Chem Inf Comput Sci. 2003;43(1):228–236. doi: 10.1021/ci020048r. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Wang R, Gao Y, Lai L. Perspectives in drug discovery. J Comput Aid Des. 2000;20(1):47–66. [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Rambali B, Antonio Fernadez J, Nuffel LV, Woestenborghs F, Baert L, Massart DL, et al. Susceptibility testing of pathogenic fungi with itraconazol: a process analysis of test variables. J Antimicrob Chem. 2001;48(2):163–177. doi: 10.1093/jac/48.2.163. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Kirkpatrick WR, McAtee RK, Revankar SG, Fothergill AW, McCarthy DI, Rinaldi MG, et al. Comparative evaluation of national committee for clinical laboratory standards broth macrodilution and agar dilution screening methods for testing fluconazole susceptibility of Cryptococcus neo-formans. J Clin Microb. 1998;36(5):1330–1332. doi: 10.1128/jcm.36.5.1330-1332.1998. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Sasek V, Sailer M, Vokoun J, Musilek V. Production of thermozymocidin (myriocin) by the pyrenomycete Melanconis flavovirens. J Basic Microb. 1989;29(6):383–390. doi: 10.1002/jobm.3620290619. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Kluepfel D, Bagli J, Baker H, Charest MP, Kudelski A, Sehgal SN, Vezina C. Myriocin, a new antifungal antibiotic from Myriococcum albomyces. J Antibiot. 1972;25(2):109–115. doi: 10.7164/antibiotics.25.109. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Abbassy M, Abdelgaleil S, Belal AS, Abdel Rasoul M. Insecticidal, antifeedant and antifungal activities of two glucosides isolated from the seeds of Simmondsia chinensis. Ind Crops Prod. 2007;26(3):345–350. [Google Scholar]

Articles from Avicenna Journal of Medical Biotechnology are provided here courtesy of Avicenna Research Institute

RESOURCES