Skip to main content
Journal of Radiology Case Reports logoLink to Journal of Radiology Case Reports
. 2012 Nov 1;6(11):8–15. doi: 10.3941/jrcr.v6i11.932

Angiomatoid Fibrous Histiocytoma: A Case Report and Review of the Literature

Adam Bauer 1,*, Bradley Jackson 2, Erin Marner 3, Dorothy Gilbertson-Dahdal 1
PMCID: PMC3558265  PMID: 23372863

Abstract

Angiomatoid fibrous histiocytoma (AFH) is a rare soft tissue tumor most commonly occurring in children, adolescents, and young adults. Clinically and radiographically the lesion is easily confused with a hematoma, soft tissue hemangioma, or malignant fibrous histiocytoma. While the lesion is rare, due to the potential for local recurrence and metastasis, it is imperative to consider this lesion in the differential diagnosis of a soft tissue mass in a child or adolescent. Here, we present the clinical, radiologic, and pathologic findings of a case of AFH.

Keywords: Angiomatoid fibrous histiocytoma, soft tissue neoplasm

CASE REPORT

An 11 year-old girl presented with a painless mass in her right thigh for 2 months. She reported no constitutional symptoms. Physical exam demonstrated a mobile, nontender, palpable mass along the lateral aspect of the right thigh without erythema or soft tissue swelling. Following initial presentation, radiographs of the right thigh (Figure 1) exhibited an ovoid, soft tissue density mass, measuring 2.2 × 4.1 cm, projecting over the subcutaneous tissue of the lateral aspect of the right thigh, at the level of the distal femoral diaphysis.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

An 11 year-old girl with angiomatoid fibrous histiocytoma. Anteroposterior radiograph of the distal right thigh demonstrates a 2.2 × 4.1 cm well-circumscribed, ovoid mass in the soft tissue of the distal thigh, lateral to the distal femoral diaphysis.

Subsequent magnetic resonance (MR) imaging of the right thigh and knee (Figure 2) demonstrated a well-circumscribed, ovoid mass measuring 1.9 × 3.3 × 3.2 cm in the subcutaneous adipose tissue of the lateral, distal thigh abutting the vastus lateralis fascia but without involvement of the underlying musculature. The lesion was homogeneously hypointense on the T1WI and heterogeneously hyperintense on the T2WI with variegated internal and nodular peripheral gadolinium enhancement. Peripherally, a pseudocapsule was markedly hypointense on both T1- and T2WI showing a fine enhancement after gadolinium IV administration. There were two internal peripherally enhancing regions of iso-hypointensity on the T1WI and hyperintensity on T2WI in the anteriomedial aspect of the lesion representing either cystic components or hyperacute blood products. No fluid-fluid levels were detected. Multiple punctate foci of marked hypointensity markedly were scattered peripherally throughout the mass on the gradient echo sequences consistent with hemosiderin deposits. Hyperintensity was recognized to track minimally in the adjacent peritumoral fascial planes fat suppressed T2 weighted images representing edema.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

An 11 year-old girl with diagnosis of angiomatoid fibrous histiocytoma. 1.5 Tesla MR scanner axial (A,B) T1-weighted spin echo (TR 617 TE 11.5), (C,D) T2 fat suppressed spin echo (TR 3970, TE 71.3), (E,F) fat suppressed fast multiplanar gradient echo (TR 185, TE 2.27), (G,H,I) axial and coronal fat suppressed fast multiplanar gradient echo (TR 185, TE 2.27) with 16 mL of Magnevist intravenous contrast, (J) coronal STIR (TR 3100, TE 63.14) images. A 1.9 × 3.3 × 3.2 cm well-circumscribed, ovoid, mixed cystic (green arrows) and solid mass is present in the subcutaneous fat of the lateral, distal right thigh abutting the vastus lateralis fascia without evidence of muscle infiltration. The lesion is homogeneously hypointense (isointense to muscle) on the T1WI and heterogeneously hyperintense on the T2WI. The periphery of the mass demonstrates the typical low signal on nonenhanced images representing a fibrous pseudocapsule (red arrows). There is variegated and micronodular peripheral gadolinium enhancement (yellow arrows), as well as nodular peripheral foci of susceptibility artifact on gradient echo images (teal arrows). T2 hyperintensity tracks minimally in the adjacent peritumoral fascial planes representing edema (pink arrows).

The patient underwent en bloc surgical excision. On pathological examination, the lesion demonstrated characteristic features of AFH including multiple nodules of eosinophilic histiocytoid or more spindled cells associated with very prominent stromal hemorrhage, a dense hyaline fibrous pseudocapsule, and a peripheral lymphoplasmacytic infiltrate with germinal centers (Figure 3). The tumor cells showed strong positivity for desmin and multifocal positivity for epithelial membrane antigen (EMA) with no significant pleomorphism. Staging CT of the abdomen and pelvis 3 weeks after excision showed no evidence of metastasis and followup MR imaging 8 months after resection demonstrated small postoperative edema without evidence of recurrence.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

An 11 year-old girl with diagnosis of angiomatoid fibrous histiocytoma. H-E stain at 400×, 100× (A,D), Desmin immunostain at 400× (B), and EMA immunostain at 400× (C). On pathological examination, the resection specimen demonstrated (A) areas of spindled cells and microscopic hemorrhage resembling vascular spaces, (B) diffuse positivity for desmin immunostain, (C) focal positivity for EMA immunostain, and (D) peripheral lymphoplasmacytic infiltrate with germinal centers within a dense hyaline fibrous pseudocapsule confirming a diagnosis of AFH.

DISCUSSION

When Enzinger initially described “angiomatoid malignant fibrous histiocytoma” in 1979 [1], the histogenesis was controversial. Today, the precise line of differentiation remains unknown, but this entity is no longer termed “malignant” due to its benign microscopic appearance and favorable prognosis [2]. Additionally, the 2002 World Health Organization (WHO) classification removed it from the malignant fibrous histiocytoma subtype of sarcoma (now synonymous with undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma) and placed it under the category of tumors of uncertain differentiation as angiomatoid fibrous histiocytoma [3].

AFH is a neoplasm that most commonly affects children and young adults, with a median age of 14 years. The tumor is rare, accounting for approximately 0.3% of all soft tissue neoplasms, albeit incidence may be underestimated due to overlapping histopathological findings [4,5]. Presentation usually involves a painless, slow growing mass within the deep dermis and subcutis [6]. It most commonly arises in sites of normal lymphoid tissue such as the antecubital fossa, axilla, inguinal and supraclavicular regions [3]. The majority of cases occur in the extremities, although cases have been reported in the head and neck region (10%) and trunk [1,7,8,9]. A small proportion of patients experience systemic symptoms including pyrexia, anemia, and malaise, suggesting tumoral cytokine production [10]. Symptoms of pain and tenderness are rarely encountered [11].

Making a pre-operative diagnosis of AFH is challenging with no distinct clinical or imaging findings to lead to diagnosis. Nonetheless, soft tissue malignancies have been stratified according to age and location to suggest one diagnosis more than another. For example, 80 % of of rare malignant soft tissue masses in a 6 – 15 year old patient in the hand and wrist, upper extremity, axilla and shoulder, lower extremity, hip, groin and buttocks, or trunk are either most likely or second most likely to be AFH according to a study of 39,179 soft tissue lesions over a 10 year period [12,13].

Despite this rigorous study, the imaging findings of AFH are as nonspecific as its histogenesis. When originating in the soft tissues, radiographs and computed tomography show a heterogeneous mass, and possibly hint at cystic and enhancing components, but ultimately are inferior to MR soft tissue detail. Consistent with the MR appearance in the 6 cases reported in the literature, our case also demonstrated (a) multiple internal cystic areas, (b) an enhancing fibrous pseudocapsule which was markedly hypointense on T1- and T2WI, and (c) foci of susceptibility artifacts representing hemosiderin. Conversely, inconsistent findings in the 6 previously reported cases included pattern of enhancement, if present or reported, and the presence, or absence of fluid-fluid levels. A summary and comparison of the findings in the cases are presented in Table 1. Taken together, these findings can be found with metastasis, hemangioma, hematoma, malignant fibrous histiocytoma, myxoid chondrosarcoma, leiomyosarcoma with necrosis, malignant ossifying fibromyxoid tumor, and various other sarcomas [14,15,16,17]. MR has traditionally been used for staging and followup, however a recent report highlights the potential utility of positron emission tomography in staging [18].

Table 1.

Imaging characteristics of reported AFH cases.

Aijlan et al.32 Li et al.21 Murphey et al.15 Petrey et al.20 (osseous) Mansfield et al.33 Bauer, Jackson, Gilbertson-Dahdal
Case # 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Age (years) 28 85 32 10 5 25 11
Cystic areas + + + + + + +
Pseudocapsule + + + + + + +
Hemosiderin + + + ? + + +
Enhancement Marked Marked ? Faint Hetero + Hetero +
Fluid-fluid level + + + + ?
T1 Homo iso Homo iso Homo iso ? Homo iso Iso Homo iso
T2 Hyper Hyper Hetero iso/hyper ? Hetero hyper Hetero hyper Hyper

Given that AFH is histopathologically composed of blood/fluid-filled cystic spaces, the variability in enhancement is surprising. Presumably, this discrepancy arises due to fat suppression artifact in case 3 and the rare variant tissue of origin in case 5, bone. However, the variability of the presence of a fluid-fluid level is less confounding given that a it indicates tumoral hemorrhage, and therefore any variance can be attributed to differing ages of blood products [19,20,21].

The diagnosis of AFH is made based on histopathology and immunohistology. Macroscopically, AFH is generally firm and circumscribed. The characteristic microscopic appearance includes distributions of ovoid to spindle cells with bland, vesicular nuclei, lymphoplasmocytic infiltrate with intervening blood-filled cystic spaces, and a fibrous pseudocapsule [22,23]. Immunohistochemistry variably demonstrates positivity for desmin, CD68 and CD 99 [24]. Lastly, cytogenetic analysis has recently added to the diagnosis of AFH, with the EWSR1-CREB1 fusion gene present in the majority of AFH [4].

Since the tumor was originally described, many studies have been done to determine the malignant potential of AFH with varying conclusions. The cumulative findings of a meta-analysis of multiple studies demonstrate that the majority of patients (73.2%) are disease free after local excision and a minority (23.2%) develop recurrent disease and 8.7% develop metastatic disease within 24 months post operation [25]. The overall mortality rate is 4.3%, however maybe underestimated due to short follow-up periods [26]. While the tumor is often termed a low malignant potential lesion in the literature, it is officially classified as being of intermediate malignant potential [27,28,29]. The clinical behavior of the tumor cannot be determined based on clinical or histiologic parameters [6,30,31]. However, the development of both local recurrence and metastases has shown a correlation with invasion into the deep fascia or muscle as assessed surgically [30]. Treatment is surgical resection.

We report a case of AFH in the right thigh of a female adolescent. The case manifests the clinical, radiographic, and histopathologic features of AFH. The patient is free of recurrence following wide surgical excision approximately 30 months following surgery. Given the intermediate malignant potential of this lesion, the patient will require continued clinical and radiographic surveillance.

TEACHING POINT

Angiomatoid fibrous histiocytoma is a rare soft tissue tumor with intermediate malignant potential. While nonspecific, a mass with MR features including cystic areas, an enhancing fibrous pseudocapsule, and internal foci blood products in the extremity of a child or adolescent should prompt the consideration of AFH in the differential. Wide surgical excision with clear margins and post-excisional monitoring is warranted.

Table 2.

Differential Table of Angiomatoid Fibrous Histiocytoma

Radiography US CT MRI-T1 MRI-T2 Pattern of contrast enhancement PET
Findings (AFH) Soft tissue density in extremity Soft tissue mass with heterogeneous echotexture +/− cystic spaces, fluid levels Heterogeneous soft tissue mass in extremity isodense to muscle, high attenuation areas (corresponding with hemorrhage), hypodense areas corresponding to myxoid, necrosis, +/− cystic spaces, fluid levels Homogeneousl y isointense to muscle on T1WI and correlating with pseudocapsule, +/− susceptibility artifact Heterogeneously hyperintense, +/− susceptibility artifact, +/− cystic spaces, fluid levels, hypointense rim corresponding to pseudocapsule Variegated and nodular peripheral gadolinium enhancement Avid FDG uptake including lymph node metastasis
Differential Diagnosis - Adults Malignant fibrous histiocytoma Hematoma Soft tissue sarcomas including MFH, fibrosarcoma, angiosarcoma Soft tissue sarcomas including MFH, fibrosarcoma, angiosarcoma Soft tissue sarcomas including MFH, fibrosarcoma, angiosarcoma Soft tissue sarcomas including MFH, fibrosarcoma, angiosarcoma
Fibrosarcoma Soft tissue sarcomas Muscle metastases Muscle metastases Muscle metastases Muscle metastases
Muscle metastases Muscle metastases Melanoma Melanoma Melanoma
Hematoma Benign lesions including lipoma, nerve sheath tumor, vascular anomalies
Nerve sheath tumor Melanoma
Vascular anomalies
Melanoma
Differential Diagnosis - Children Malignant fibrous histiocytoma Hematoma Soft tissue sarcomas including MFH, angiosarcoma Soft tissue sarcomas including MFH, angiosarcoma Soft tissue sarcomas including MFH, angiosarcoma Soft tissue sarcomas including MFH, angiosarcoma
Extraosseous Ewing’s Soft tissue sarcomas Muscle metastases Muscle metastases Muscle metastases Muscle metastases
Muscle metastases Muscle metastases Extraosseous Ewing’s Extraosseous Ewing’s Extraosseous Ewing’s Extraosseous Ewing’s
Hematoma Benign lesions including lipoma, nerve sheath tumor, vascular anomalies
Nerve sheath tumor Extraosseous Ewing’s
Vascular anomalies

Table 3.

Summary Table of Angiomatoid Fibrous Histiocytoma

Etiology Uncertain differentiation
Incidence << 1%, ~ 1/100,000; 0.3% of soft tissue neoplasms
Gender Ratio 1:3 F:M
Age Predilection ≤ 30
Risk Factors None known
Treatment Surgical excision
Prognosis 23% recurrence, 8.7 % metastasis; generally favorable but classified as intermediate biologic behavior
Findings on imaging Soft tissue mass in extremity, heterogeneous density, echogenicity, T1,T2 signal, with hemorrhage, myxoid, necrosis, +/− cystic spaces, fluid levels

ABBREVIATIONS

AFH

angiomatoid fibrous histiocytoma

EMA

epithelial membrane antigen

H-E

Haematoxylin Eosin

MR

magnetic resonance

STIR

short tau inversion recovery

T1WI

T1-weighted image

T2WI

T2-weighted image

WHO

World Health Organization

REFERENCES

  • 1.Enzinger FM. Angiomatoid malignant fibrous histiocytoma: a distinct fibrohistiocytic tumor of children and young adults simulating a vascular neoplasm. Cancer. 1979;44:2147–2157. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(197912)44:6<2147::aid-cncr2820440627>3.0.co;2-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Matushansky I, Charytonowicz E, Mills J, et al. MFH classification: differentiating undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma in the 21st Century. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther. 2009 Aug;9(8):1135–44. doi: 10.1586/era.09.76. Review. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Fletcher CD. The evolving classification of soft tissue tumours: an update based on the new WHO classification. Histopathology. 2006 Jan;48(1):3–12. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2559.2005.02284.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Fanburg-Smith JC, Dal Cin p. Angiomatoid fibrous histiocytoma. Pathology and Genetics of Tumors of Soft Tissue and Bone. In: Fletcher CDM, Unni KK, Mertens F, editors. World Health Organization Classification of Tumors. Lyon, France: IARC Press; 2002. pp. 194–195. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Antonescu CR, Dal Cin P, Nafa K, et al. EWSR1-CREB1 is the predominant gene fusion in angiomatoid fibrous histiocytoma. Genes Chromosomes Cancer. 2007;46:1051Y1060. doi: 10.1002/gcc.20491. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Grossman LD, White RR, Arber DA. Angiomatoid fibrous histiocytoma. Annals of Plastic Surgery. 1996;36:649–651. doi: 10.1097/00000637-199606000-00016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Santa Cruz DJ, Kyriakos M. Aneurysmal (Angiomatoid) fibrous histiocytoma of the skin. Cancer. 1981;47:2053–2061. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19810415)47:8<2053::aid-cncr2820470825>3.0.co;2-a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Regezi JA, Zareo RJ, Tomich CE, Lloyd RV, Courtney RM, Crissman JD. Immunoprofile of benign and malignant fibrocystic tumors. Journal of Oral Pathology. 1987;16:260–265. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0714.1987.tb01490.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Costa D, Nagle SB, Wagholika UL. Angiomatoid malignant fibrous histiocytoma. Indian Journal of Pathology & Microbiology. 1990;33:280–283. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Fletcher CD. Angiomatoid “malignant fibrous histiocytoma”: an immunohistochemical study indicative of myoid differentiation. Hum Pathol. 1991;22:563–568. doi: 10.1016/0046-8177(91)90233-f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.McKenna DB, Kavanagh GM, McLaren KM, et al. Aneurysmal fibrous histiocytoma: an unusual variant of cutaneous fibrous histiocytoma. Journal of European Academy of Dermatological Venereology. 1990;12:238–240. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Kransdorf MJ. Benign soft-tissue tumors in a large referral population: distribution of specific diagnoses by age, sex, and location. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1995 Feb;164(2):395–402. doi: 10.2214/ajr.164.2.7839977. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Kransdorf MJ. Malignant soft-tissue tumors in a large referral population: distribution of specific diagnoses by age, sex, and location. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1995 Jan;164(1):129–34. doi: 10.2214/ajr.164.1.7998525. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.De Beuckeleer L. Fibrocytic tumor. In: De Schepper AM, Parizel PM, De Beuckeleer L, et al., editors. Imaging of soft tissue tumors. Berlin Heidelberg New York: Springer; 2001. pp. 181–193. [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Murphey MD, Gross TM, Rosenthal HG. From the archives of the AFIP. Musculoskeletal malignant fibrous histiocytoma: radiologic-pathologic correlation. Radiographics. 1994;14:807–826. doi: 10.1148/radiographics.14.4.7938770. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Sangala JR, Park P, Blaivas M, et al. Paraspinal malignant ossifying fibromyxoid tumor with spinal involvement. J Clin Neurosci. 2010 Dec;17(12):1592–4. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2010.04.022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.De Schepper AM, De Beuckeleer L, Vandevenne J, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging of soft tissue tumors. Eur Radiol. 2000;10(2):213–23. doi: 10.1007/s003300050037. Review. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Makis W, Ciarallo A, Hickeson M, et al. Angiomatoid fibrous histiocytoma: staging and evaluation of response to therapy with F-18 FDG PET/CT. Clin Nucl Med. 2011 May;36(5):376–9. doi: 10.1097/RLU.0b013e31820aa28e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Tsai JC, Dalinka MK, Fallon MD, et al. Fluid-fluid level: a nonspecific finding in tumors of bone and soft tissue. Radiology. 1990;175:779–782. doi: 10.1148/radiology.175.3.2160676. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Petrey WB, LeGallo RD, Fox MG, et al. Imaging characteristics of angiomatoid fibrous histiocytoma of bone. Skeletal Radiol. 2011 Feb;40(2):233–7. doi: 10.1007/s00256-010-1023-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Li CS, Chan WP, Chen WT, et al. MRI of angiomatoid fibrous histiocytoma. Skeletal Radiol. 2004 Oct;33(10):604–8. doi: 10.1007/s00256-004-0769-7. Epub 2004 Jul 16. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Fanburg-Smith JC, Miettinen M. Angiomatoid “malignant” fibrous histiocytoma: a clinicopathologic study of 158 cases and further exploration of the myoid phenotype. Hum Pathol. 1999;30:1336–1343. doi: 10.1016/s0046-8177(99)90065-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Thway K. Angiomatoid Fibrous Histiocytoma. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2008;132:273–277. doi: 10.5858/2008-132-273-AFHARW. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Smith ME, Costa MJ, Weiss SW. Evaluation of CD68 and other histiologic antigens in angiomatoid malignant fibrous histiocytoma. Am J Surg Pathol. 1991;15:757–763. doi: 10.1097/00000478-199108000-00005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Costa MJ, Weiss SW. Angiomatoid malignant fibrous histiocytoma. A follow-up study of 108 cases with evaluation of possible histologic predictors of outcome. Am J Surg Pathol. 1990 Dec;14(12):1126–32. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Chow LT, Allen PW, Kumta SM, et al. Angiomatoid Malignant Fibrous Histiocytoma: Report of an Unusual Case with Highly Aggressive Clinical Course. J of Foot and Ankle Surgery. 1998;37:235–238. doi: 10.1016/s1067-2516(98)80117-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Fletcher CDM. Diagnostic Histopathology of Tumors. 1st edn. New York: Churchill Livingstone; 1995. p. 24. [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Devita VT, Jr, Hellman S, Rosenburg SA. Cancer Principles and Practice of Oncology. 6th edn. Philadelphia, Pennsylvania: Lippincot Williams & Wilkins; 2001. p. 1845. [Google Scholar]
  • 29.McMann CK, Gourin CRG. Pathology: sarcomas of the head and neck. 2002. URL: http://www.e-medicine.com/ent/topic675.htm.
  • 30.Costa MJ, Weiss SW. Angiomatoid malignant fibrous histiocytoma: a follow-up study of 108 cases with evaluation of possible histiologic predictors of outcome. Am J Surg Pathol. 1990;14:1126–1132. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Pettinato G, Manivel JC, De Rosa G, et al. Angiomatoid malignant fibrous histiocytoma: Cytologic, immunohistiochemical, ultrastructural, and flow cytometric study of 20 cases. Mod Pathol. 1990;3:479–487. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Ajlan AM, Sayegh K, Powell T, et al. Angiomatoid fibrous histiocytoma: magnetic resonance imaging appearance in 2 cases. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2010 Sep-Oct;34(5):791–4. doi: 10.1097/RCT.0b013e3181e39755. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Mansfield A, Larson B, Stafford SL, et al. Angiomatoid fibrous histiocytoma in a 25-year-old male. Rare Tumors. 2010 Jun 30;2(2):e20. doi: 10.4081/rt.2010.e20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Radiology Case Reports are provided here courtesy of EduRad

RESOURCES