Abstract
The diphosphoinositol polyphosphates (PP-IPs) are a central group of eukaryotic second messengers. They regulate numerous processes, including cellular energy homeostasis and adaptation to environmental stresses. To date, most of the molecular details in PP-IP signalling have remained elusive, due to a lack of appropriate methods and reagents. Here we describe the expedient synthesis of methylene-bisphosphonate PP-IP analogues. Their characterization revealed that the analogues exhibit significant stability and mimic their natural counterparts very well. This was further confirmed in two independent biochemical assays, in which our analogues potently inhibited phosphorylation of the protein kinase Akt and hydrolytic activity of the Ddp1 phosphohydrolase. The non-hydrolysable PP-IPs thus emerge as important tools and hold great promise for a variety of applications.
Introduction
Cellular decision-making is governed by the concerted actions of signalling proteins and small molecule second messengers. Among the eukaryotic second messengers, the diphosphoinositol polyphosphates (PP-IPs) constitute an important class. These molecules have captured the attention of both chemists and biologists, because of their unique chemical structure and their ability to mediate a plethora of interesting phenotypes.1
The PP-IPs are a group of highly phosphorylated signalling molecules, based on the myo-inositol scaffold, that contain one or two high-energy pyrophosphate groups. These phosphate groups are installed in a biosynthetic pathway that is well conserved from yeast to mammals (a simplified pathway diagram is shown in Figure 1).1
The successive phosphorylation reactions are carried out by a set of dedicated small molecule kinases. Genetic perturbation of these kinases in yeast revealed important functions for PP-IPs in many cellular processes, including telomere maintenance,2 response to oxidative stress,3 and nutrient sensing.4 Mice that lack the kinase Ip6k1 (inositol hexakisphosphate kinase 1) are not able to produce sufficient amounts of 5PP-IP5 – the best characterized PP-IP to date – in various tissues (Figure 1).5 These mice exhibit severe defects in insulin secretion, increased peripheral insulin sensitivity, and resistance to age and diet-induced obesity.5, 6 While these phenotypes are truly remarkable, the underlying molecular mechanisms have remained enigmatic.
Traditionally, small diffusible messengers bind to particular target proteins to control their activity or localization. It is therefore commonly assumed that PP-IPs utilize an allosteric mechanism to regulate protein function. However, only a handful of targets have been identified to date, and in some cases the biological relevance is not clear.4, 5b, 7 An alternative signalling mechanism for the PP-IPs involves the transfer of the high-energy β-phosphate group onto a phospho-serine residue, yielding a pyrophosphorylated protein.8 But due to technical challenges, it has only been possible to identify pyrophosphorylated proteins in biochemical assays and not from complex cell lysates.9 Overall, progress in decoding PP-IP signalling has been hindered by a lack of suitable methods and reagents. As current approaches rely on standard biochemical and genetic techniques, there is a pressing need for chemical tools that can help to decipher the discrete PP-IP signalling functions.
Here we report the synthesis and characterization of a number of non-hydrolysable methylene-bisphosphonate PP-IP analogues (Figure 2). We demonstrate that the analogues are good mimics of the natural counterpart with regard to their conformation in solution and their protein binding properties. Our analogues thus represent an important set of mechanistic probes that will be of great use for the inositol signalling community, and we highlight a number of possible applications.
Results and discussion
Expedient synthesis of PP-IP analogues
The methylene-bisphosphonate moiety has widely been used as a stable substitute for diphosphate groups; an important example is AMPPCP (β,γ-methyleneadenosine 5′-triphosphate), a non-hydrolysable analogue of ATP.10 Among the PP-IP family members, the 5PP-IP5 messenger is the most prominent one and we therefore decided to focus on the synthesis of the non-hydrolysable methylene-bisphosphonate 5PCP-IP5 (2, Figure 2) using the synthetic route outlined in Scheme 1.11 The protected myo-inositol 5 can be obtained from myo-inositol in three steps.12 The bisphosphonate group was then installed in the 5-position, to provide intermediate 6a in good yield. Removal of the benzoyland acetonide protecting groups furnished the pentaol 7b, which was subsequently phosphitylated and oxidized (8b). The phosphate groups were unveiled as the free phosphates via hydrogenation in the presence of NaHCO3, and 5PCP-IP5 (2) was isolated as the sodium salt. Compared to the synthesis of the natural molecule 5PP-IP5,13 the non-hydrolysable analogue is accessible in good quantity and high purity, while requiring fewer synthetic steps.
Another PP-IP family member is 5PP-IP4 (Figure 1), a molecule that has been linked to telomere maintenance and DNA damage repair.2 The corresponding bisphosphonate analogue 5PCP-IP4 (3) was synthesized using a slightly modified route: Removal of the acetonide groups from 6a was followed by phosphitylation, and oxidation (8a). Subsequent hydrogenation afforded a diphosphoinositol phosphate analogue that is benzoyl-protected in the 2-position (4). The benzoyl group was cleaved using aqueous ammonia and yielded the non-hydrolysable analogue 5PCP-IP4 (3). Both 5PCP-IP4 (3) and 5PCP-IP5 (2) showed no signs of decomposition in aqueous solution at neutral pH, after 40 days at room temperature.
5PP-IP5 and 5PCP-IP5 exhibit the same pH dependent conformational change
The pKa’s of a pyrophosphate group differ slightly from those of a bisphosphonate group,14 and it was therefore important to determine that 5PP-IP5 (1), and the non-hydrolysable analogue 5PCP-IP5 (2), exhibit the same properties in solution. Since the conformation of the inositol ring depends on the ionization state of the individual phosphate groups, 1H and 31P NMR titration curves can be used to compare the solution properties of 1 and 2.14
To do so, 5PP-IP5 (1) was synthesized according to a modified literature procedure (Scheme S1),13, 16 and both 5PP-IP5 and 5PCP-IP5 were titrated in D2O (containing 140mM K+, 10mM Na+, and 1mM Mg2+ to mimic cellular metal cation content) at room temperature. Figure 3 depicts a subset of the 1H NMR titration data of the two molecules (for all data see Figures S1 and S2). The ring inversion, which converts 5 equatorial/1 axial substituents to 1 equatorial/5 axial substituents, occurred around pD 8.8 for both molecules.17 While these data do not provide a direct measurement of the pKa values for 1 and 2, the titration curves highlight the similarity of the overall ionization state of the two molecules.18
5PCP-IP5 exhibited much higher stability compared to 5PP-IP5. Even at a low or high pD (2.0 or 13.0), no detectable decomposition occurred after 40 days at room temperature. The non-hydrolysable PP-IP analogues will therefore be of great use to characterize the physicochemical properties of the PP-IP messengers. Furthermore, our lab is interested in the rich metal-coordination chemistry of these molecules.19 The presence of highly Lewis acidic metal cations, such as Mg2+ and Fe3+, promotes hydrolysis of the PP-IPs, but our bisphosphonate analogues circumvent this problem and can be used as surrogates to delineate the metal-binding properties of PP-IP molecules.
PP-IP analogues potently inhibit Akt phosphorylation in vitro
It is thought that PP-IPs can control protein activity or localization via allosteric regulation.4, 5b, 7 If 5PCP-IP5 indeed closely mimics 5PP-IP5, it should exert the same allosteric control over a given protein binding partner.
Recently, it was reported that 5PP-IP5 binds to the pleckstrin homology (PH) domain of the protein kinase Akt (also known as protein kinase B).5b This binding event was proposed to stabilize Akt in an inactive conformation, which precludes Akt from becoming phosphorylated on threonine 308 by the upstream kinase PDK1 (3-phosphoinositide-dependent protein kinase, Figure 4a). We tested the inhibitory activity of both 5PP-IP5 and 5PCP-IP5 in a biochemical assay, using purified inactive Akt and activated PDK1. The two kinases were incubated in the presence of varying concentrations of 5PP-IP5 or 5PCP-IP5 and inhibition of Akt phosphorylation at threonine 308 was monitored using a phosphospecific antibody (Figure 4b). As previously reported, 5PP-IP5 potently inhibited Akt phosphorylation. Under our assay conditions, 5PP-IP5 displayed an IC50 of 217 nM.20 Similarly, 5PCP-IP5 closely resembled its natural counterpart with an IC50 of 129 nM. These data illustrate that changing the pyrophosphate moiety to a methylene-bisphosphonate group did not significantly alter the affinity of the small molecule for a known protein binding partner. Consequently, it should be feasible to utilize 5PCP-IP5 as an affinity reagent to identify PP-IP protein binding partners.
From a synthetic perspective, the 2-position of 5PCP-IP5 could most easily be derivatized for attachment to a solid support. To determine how important the phosphate group in the 2-position is for the binding interaction with Akt, we evaluated the analogues 4PCP-IP5 (3) and 2Bz-4PCP-IP5 (4), which contain a hydroxyl group or a benzoyl group in the 2-position, respectively. Remarkably, those structural changes did not diminish their affinity for Akt (Figure 4b).21 Encouraged by these results, we are currently exploring a number of attachment strategies for these molecules.
PP-IP analogues inhibit the Ddp1 phosphohydrolase in vitro
We next sought to validate the non-hydrolysable analogues in a different biochemical assay, but examples of PP-IP binding proteins in the literature are scarce.4, 5b, 7 Since the enzymes involved in PP-IP metabolism must bind to their substrates, we chose to investigate the binding of our analogues to the yeast polyphosphate phosphatase Ddp1. Ddp1 hydrolyses diadenosine polyphosphates, inorganic polyphosphates, and a subset of PP-IPs.22 A recent report from Saiardi and co-workers demonstrated that Ddp1 exhibited highly varied activity towards different PP-IP isomers: While 1PP-IP5 - a PP-IP family member with the pyrophosphate group in the 1-position - was completely hydrolysed to IP6 after 30 minutes at 37 °C, 5PP-IP5 showed no signs of hydrolysis under the same conditions.22c We therefore reasoned that 5PP-IP5 could be a competitive inhibitor for Ddp1 when used in combination with other Ddp1 substrates, such as diadenosine pentakisphosphate (Ap5A).
Ddp1 was expressed and purified using an N-terminal polyhistidine tag (His). When His-Ddp1 was incubated with Ap5A, it displayed robust phosphohydrolase activity, as determined by HPLC analysis of the reaction products (Figure 5a).23 Next, varying concentrations of 5PP-IP5 were added to the Ap5A hydrolysis reaction. As expected, 5PP-IP5 acts as a competitive inhibitor with an IC50 of 2.5 µM (Figure 5b).24 Testing of 5PCP-IP5 and 5PCP-IP4 revealed very similar inhibition profiles (Figures 5b and S4), which corroborates that the bisphosphonate moiety is a suitable mimic for the pyrophosphate group, as it is bound by the protein with similar affinity. Interestingly, 2Bz-5PCP-IP4 exhibited the highest potency with an IC50 value in the submicromolar range (0.16 µM). As was also observed for Akt, the benzoyl substituent in the 2-position does not lower the binding affinity; in fact, it made the molecule significantly more potent. Possible explanations for the increased potency include a favourable interaction of the benzoyl group with the protein, and/or changes in solvation of the unbound 2Bz-5PCP-IP4, which may decrease its ground-state stabilization compared to the other analogues.
Based on its high potency, 2Bz-5PCP-IP4 may become useful to inhibit Ddp1 activity in cell lysates to prevent hydrolysis of Ddp1 substrates, thereby facilitating their identification and analysis. Overall, the Ddp1 inhibition studies paralleled our observations from the Akt assay, further validating that the bisphosphonate analogues are adequate surrogates for the natural molecules.
Conclusions
Even though the PP-IPs were discovered almost 20 years ago, we are just beginning to appreciate their complex functions as central regulators of cell homeostasis. This gap in our understanding is due to the dearth of reagents available to study PP-IP function in vivo and in vitro. The PP-IP analogues described in this paper hold great promise for filling several of these gaps. We have shown that the bisphosphonate group adequately mimics the pyrophosphate group in PP-IPs, while providing easier synthetic accessibility and increased stability. The non-hydrolysable analogues can therefore be developed into affinity reagents for the systematic identification of PP-IP interacting partners. Subsequently, the increased stability of the analogues will be advantageous for co-crystallizations of PP-IPs with their binding partners.
The bisphosphonate analogues will also be highly informative with respect to the other PP-IP signalling mechanism, protein pyrophosphorylation. Our compounds are not able to transfer their β-phosphoryl group onto protein substrates and provide a facile means to distinguish the two signalling mechanisms in biochemical assays. Progress on using the analogues as mechanistic probes will be described in due course.
Until now there has been a reliance on genetic and molecular biology techniques to study PP-IP function. A major focus, however, should be on the molecules themselves. We believe that the non-hydrolysable PP-IPs describe in this paper will help to shift this imbalance, and will provide valuable insight into the biological functions of PP-IP molecules.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank Dr. Adolfo Saiardi for providing the constructs for Ddp1 expression, and the Muir, Doyle, MacMillan and Sorensen groups for use of their chemicals and instruments.
Financial support was provided by Princeton University, and the NIH (R00 GM087306).
Footnotes
† Electronic Supplementary Information (ESI) available: Experimental procedures, spectroscopic data, and supporting Figures. See DOI: 10.1039/b000000x/
Notes and references
- 1. For recent reviews on diphosphoinositol polyphosphate signalling see: Saiardi A. Subcell.Biochem. 2012;59:413. doi: 10.1007/978-94-007-3015-1_14. Chakraborty A, Kim S, Snyder SH. Sci. Signal. 2011;4:re1. doi: 10.1126/scisignal.2001958. Monserrate JP, York JD. Curr. Opin. Cell. Biol. 2010;22:365. doi: 10.1016/j.ceb.2010.03.006. Wundenberg T, Mayr GW. Biological chemistry. 2012;393:979. doi: 10.1515/hsz-2012-0133. Shears SB. Mole. Pharmacol. 2009;76:236. doi: 10.1124/mol.109.055897.. For recent reviews on inositol phosphate chemistry see: Conway SJ, Miller GJ. Nat. Prod. Rep. 2007;24:687. doi: 10.1039/b407701f. Best MD, Zhang H, Prestwich GD. Nat. Prod. Rep. 2010;27:1403. doi: 10.1039/b923844c.. While this manuscript was under review, a paper describing the synthesis of phosphonoacetic acid ester analogues of PP-IPs was published: Riley AM, Wang H, Weaver J, Shears S, Potter BVL. Chem. Comm. 2012 just accepted manuscript.
- 2.Saiardi A, Resnick AC, Snowman AM, Wendland B, Snyder SH. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 2005;102:1911. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0409322102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; 2b York SJ, Armbruster BN, Greenwell P, Petes TD, York JD. J. Biol. Chem. 2005;280:4264. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M412070200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Onnebo SMN, Saiardi A. Biochem. J. 2009;423:109. doi: 10.1042/BJ20090241. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.a) Lee Y-S, Mulugu S, York JD, O'Shea EK. Science. 2007;316:109. doi: 10.1126/science.1139080. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b) Lee Y-S, Huang K, Quiocho FA, O'Shea EK. Nat. Chem. Biol. 2008;4:25. doi: 10.1038/nchembio.2007.52. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.a) Bhandari R, Juluri KR, Resnick AC, Snyder SH. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 2008;105:2349. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0712227105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b) Chakraborty A, Koldobskiy MA, Bello NT, Maxwell M, Potter JJ, Juluri KR, Maag D, Kim S, Huang AS, Dailey MJ, Saleh M, Snowman AM, Moran TH, Mezey E, Snyder SH. Cell. 2010;143:897. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2010.11.032. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Illies C, Gromada J, Fiume R, Leibiger B, Yu J, Juhl K, Yang S-N, Barma DK, Falck JR, Saiardi A, Barker CJ, Berggren P-O. Science. 2007;318:1299. doi: 10.1126/science.1146824. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.a) Luo HBR, Huang YE, Chen JMC, Saiardi A, Iijima M, Ye KQ, Huang YF, Nagata E, Devreotes P, Snyder SH. Cell. 2003;114:559. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(03)00640-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b) Ye WL, Ali N, Bembenek ME, Shears SB, Lafer EM. J. Biol. Chem. 1995;270:1564. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.a) Saiardi A, Bhandari R, Resnick AC, Snowman AM, Snyder SH. Science. 2004;306:2101. doi: 10.1126/science.1103344. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b) Bhandari R, Saiardi A, Ahmadibeni Y, Snowman AM, Resnick AC, Kristiansen TZ, Molina H, Pandey A, Werner JK, Jr, Juluri KR, Xu Y, Prestwich GD, Parang K, Snyder SH. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 2007;104:15305. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0707338104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.a) Azevedo C, Burton A, Ruiz-Mateos E, Marsh M, Saiardi A. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 2009;106:21161. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0909176106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b) Szijgyarto Z, Garedew A, Azevedo C, Saiardi A. Science. 2011;334:802. doi: 10.1126/science.1211908. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.a) Elliott TS, Slowey A, Ye Y, Conway SJ. Med. Chem. Commun. 2012;3:735. [Google Scholar]; b) Mueller G, Wied S, Over S, Frick W. Biochemistry. 2008;47:1259. doi: 10.1021/bi701413t. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; c) Verrier JD, Exo JL, Jackson TC, Ren J, Gillespie DG, Dubey RK, Kochanek PM, Jackson EK. J. Neurochem. 2011;118:979. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2011.07392.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; d) Mochalkin I, Miller JR, Evdokimov A, Lightle S, Yan C, Stover CK, Waldrop GL. Prot. Sci. 2008;17:1706. doi: 10.1110/ps.035584.108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; e) Wang K-T, Wang J, Li L-F, Su X-D. J. Mol. Biol. 2009;390:747. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2009.05.032. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.We have also considered the incorporation of a difluoromethylene-bisphosphonate (PCF2P) group, because the PCF2P group more closely resembles the pKa values of the pyrophosphate group.10a However, the PCF2P analogues posed a significant synthetic challenge, and we ultimately focused our efforts on the methylene-bisphosphonates. We acknowledge that the differences in the pKa’s of 5PP-IP5 versus 5PCP-IP5 could be an issue, but, as our subsequent biochemical studies show, these differences in pKa do not appear to be a significant limitation in the two examples highlighted.
- 12.a) Godage HY, Riley AM, Woodman TJ, Potter BVL. Chem. Commun. 2006:2989. doi: 10.1039/b605392k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b) Chung SK, Chang YT, Kwon YU. J. Carbohydr. Chem. 1998;17:369. [Google Scholar]
- 13. Zhang H, Thompson J, Prestwich GD. Org. Lett. 2009;11:1551. doi: 10.1021/ol900149x.. An alternative synthesis of 5PP-IP5 involved fewer synthetic steps but was carried out on a small scale: ref 8b.
- 14.a) Engel R. Chem. Rev. 1977;77:349. [Google Scholar]; b) Flohr A, Aemissegger A, Hilvert D. J. Med. Chem. 1999;42:2633. doi: 10.1021/jm991008q. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.a) Isbrandt LR, Oertel RP. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1980;102:3144. [Google Scholar]; b) Lindon JC, Baker DJ, Farrant RD, Williams JM. Biochem. J. 1986;233:275. doi: 10.1042/bj2330275. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; c) Blum-Held C, Bernard P, Spiess B. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001;123:3399. doi: 10.1021/ja015616i. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; d) Riley AM, Trusselle M, Kuad P, Borkovec M, Cho J, Choi JH, Qian X, Shears SB, Spiess B, Potter BVL. ChemBioChem. 2006;7:1114. doi: 10.1002/cbic.200600037. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.An HPLC purification step before the final deprotection proved to be essential to obtain 5PP-IP5 in the desired purity.
- 17.The assignments of conformations was based on previous reports, coupling constant analysis, 1H-1H COSY, and 1H-31P HSQC (see Supporting Information).
- 18.Interestingly, there is a noticeable difference in the chemical shifts of H4/6 for 1 versus 2 at basic pH. We believe that subtle changes in Mg2+ coordination may be responsible for this, as the difference in chemical shift is less pronounced when the NMR spectra were recorded in the absence of Mg2+ (see Supporting Information).
- 19.Nothing is known about the coordination chemistry of PP-IPs. For studies on the metal-coordination properties of IP5 and IP6 see: Veiga N, Torres J, Dominguez S, Mederos A, Irvine RF, Diaz A, Kremer C. J. Inorg. Biochem. 2006;100:1800. doi: 10.1016/j.jinorgbio.2006.06.016. Torres J, Dominguez S, Cerda MF, Obal G, Mederos A, Irvine RF, Diaz A, Kremer C. J. Inorg. Biochem. 2005;99:828. doi: 10.1016/j.jinorgbio.2004.12.011. Veiga N, Torres J, Godage HY, Riley AM, Domínguez S, Potter BV, Díaz A, Kremer C. J. Biol. Inorg. Chem. 2009;14:1001. doi: 10.1007/s00775-009-0510-z.
- 20.The published IC50 value is 20 nM. Presumably differences in buffer composition and/or incubation times are responsible for this discrepancy.
- 21.2Bz-5PCP-IP4 appeared to be the most potent. This trend was paralleled in subsequent experiments using the yeast Ddp1 phosphohydrolase and is discussed in the the following section.
- 22.a) Cartwright JL, McLennan AG. J. Biol. Chem. 1999;274:8604. doi: 10.1074/jbc.274.13.8604. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b) Safrany ST, Ingram SW, Cartwright JL, Falck JR, McLennan AG, Barnes LD, Shears SB. J. Biol. Chem. 1999;274:21735. doi: 10.1074/jbc.274.31.21735. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; c) Lonetti A, Szijgyarto Z, Bosch D, Loss O, Azevedo C, Saiardi A. J. Biol. Chem. 2011;286:31966. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M111.266320. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.We ruled out the possibility that the reaction product IP6 may be responsible for this inhibition, as the IC50 value for IP6 in this reaction is more than ten times higher (data not shown).
- 24.As a control, we confirmed that Ap5A showed no signs of hydrolysis when incubated with His-Ddp1EE/AQ, a catalytically inactive form of Ddp1 (Figure S3)
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.