Skip to main content
PMC home page
Scientific Reports logoLink to Scientific Reports
. 2013 Feb 1;3:1197. doi: 10.1038/srep01197

Human adipose tissue-derived mesenchymal stem cells secrete functional neprilysin-bound exosomes

Takeshi Katsuda 1,2, Reiko Tsuchiya 3, Nobuyoshi Kosaka 1, Yusuke Yoshioka 1, Kentaro Takagaki 3, Katsuyuki Oki 3, Fumitaka Takeshita 1, Yasuyuki Sakai 2, Masahiko Kuroda 4, Takahiro Ochiya 1,a
PMCID: PMC3561625  PMID: 23378928

Abstract

Alzheimer's disease (AD) is characterized by the accumulation of β-amyloid peptide (Aβ) in the brain because of an imbalance between Aβ production and clearance. Neprilysin (NEP) is the most important Aβ-degrading enzyme in the brain. Thus, researchers have explored virus-mediated NEP gene delivery. However, such strategies may entail unexpected risks, and thus exploration of a new possibility for NEP delivery is also required. Here, we show that human adipose tissue-derived mesenchymal stem cells (ADSCs) secrete exosomes carrying enzymatically active NEP. The NEP-specific activity level of 1 μg protein from ADSC-derived exosomes was equivalent to that of ~ 0.3 ng of recombinant human NEP. Of note, ADSC-derived exosomes were transferred into N2a cells, and were suggested to decrease both secreted and intracellular Aβ levels in the N2a cells. Importantly, these characteristics were more pronounced in ADSCs than bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells, suggesting the therapeutic relevance of ADSC-derived exosomes for AD.

Alzheimer's disease (AD) is a progressive and fatal neurodegenerative disorder that is characterized by memory loss and cognitive ability deterioration. The accumulation of β-amyloid peptide (Aβ) in the brain plays a critical role in AD pathogenesis1,2. The steady-state level of Aβ is determined by a balance between its biosynthesis and clearance3. The physiological metabolite Aβ is constantly produced and removed in the brain, and it has been demonstrated that even small decreases in its removal lead to Aβ deposition3. Among several proteases involved in the proteolysis of Aβ, neprilysin (neutral endopeptidase: NEP), a type II membrane-associated metalloendopeptidase, appears to be the most important4,5. Indeed, AD patients show decreased expression and activity of NEP6. Thus, NEP has been intensively studied as a potential therapeutic target for AD7. One promising approach for lowering brain Aβ levels is the delivery of NEP. Recent reports have indicated that NEP gene delivery either peripherally or within the brain is effective in clearing brain Aβ7. However, safety issues related to the use of viral vectors limit the feasibility of this approach.

NEP, more often referred to as CD10, is expressed by mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs)8,9. However, to our knowledge, no study has explored the therapeutic potential of MSCs with regard to their Aβ degrading capacity. MSCs initially attracted interest for their ability to differentiate into cells of mesodermal lineage in vitro and in vivo11. Furthermore, in the last decade, it has been demonstrated that MSCs have many other functional properties. They can differentiate into cells from unrelated germline lineages, resist immunosurveillance, home to injured tissue, and secrete factors with immunosuppressive, anti-apoptotic, and trophic effects10,11. Accordingly, there is growing evidence that MSC-based therapies could benefit a wide range of neurodegenerative diseases12, including AD13,14,15,16,17,18. The mechanisms by which transplanted MSCs influence AD have been roughly classified as cellular replacement13,14 or paracrine secretion15,16,17,18, but the precise mechanism remains unclear. Thus, any possible mechanism of AD pathophysiology should be investigated, and any possible strategy for AD treatment should be explored.

Another recently reported remarkable feature of MSCs is their ability to secrete exosomes with therapeutic potential19. Exosomes are small, intraluminal vesicles of multivesicular bodies released when they fuse with the plasma membrane20. It has been suggested that these vesicles are produced by a variety of cell types and can function as intercellular transmitters of mRNA, microRNA, and proteins21,22,23. The first evidence of the therapeutic potential of MSC-derived exosomes was in a mouse model of acute kidney injury24. Bruno et al. found that bone marrow-derived (BM−) MSC exosomes activated a proliferative program in surviving tubular cells after injury via a horizontal transfer of mRNA. Lai et al. also reported that MSC-derived exosomes exerted therapeutic effects on myocardial ischemia/reperfusion injury25.

Given that exosomes are membrane vesicles and that MSCs express membrane-bound enzyme NEP, it can be assumed that MSCs would secrete exosomes with NEP on their membrane. Here, we report for the first time that adipose tissue-derived MSCs (ADSCs) produce NEP-bound exosomes approximately 100–200 nm in diameter. Furthermore, co-culture of N2a cells overproducing human Aβ with ADSCs led to decreases in the secreted Aβ40 and 42 levels as well as a decrease in the intracellular Aβ42 level. Importantly, these characteristics were more pronounced in ADSCs than BM-MSCs, suggesting the therapeutic relevance of ADSC-derived exosomes for AD.

Results

ADSCs express NEP at a higher level than BM-MSCs

To select the optimal source of MSCs for the present study, we performed comparative analyses on NEP expression between ADSCs and BM-MSCs. A flow cytometry analysis indicated that NEP-positive populations in ADSCs were greater than those in BM-MSCs (Fig. 1A); regarding the other surface markers, they showed the similar profiles that are characteristic to MSCs (positive for CD105, CD73, CD90, and CD44; negative for CD45, CD31, and CD34) (Fig. S1). By qRT-PCR analysis, we confirmed that NEP gene expression levels were considerably higher in ADSCs from each donor than in BM-MSCs from all 4 donors (Fig. 1B). In addition, immunoblot analysis revealed that the NEP protein expression level in ADSCs was ~ 4-fold higher than that of BM-MSCs (Fig. 1C). This observation was further confirmed by immunocytochemistry, where ADSCs were stained for NEP more strongly than BM-MSCs (Fig. 1D). Collectively, these results demonstrate that ADSCs express more NEP than BM-MSCs. Thus, we mainly focused on ADSCs for the subsequent experiments.

Figure 1. ADSCs express NEP at a higher level than BM-MSCs.

Figure 1

Open in a new tab

(A) Flow cytometry results of ADSCs #1 and #4 and BM-MSCs #1 and #4 for NEP. (B) qRT-PCR analysis of NEP in ADSCs and BM-MSCs. Transcript levels were normalized to β-actin levels. Data are the mean ± S.D. (n = 3). (C) Cell lysates of ADSCs or BM-MSCs were analyzed by immunoblotting with an anti-NEP or an anti-actin antibody (left). Either 3 μg or 1 μg of cell lysate protein per lane was loaded for NEP and actin, respectively. The relative signal intensity (NEP/Actin) for each sample was measured, and normalized values are shown in the graph. The average values of ADSCs and BM-MSCs are compared on the right. Data are the mean ± S.D. (D) Immuno cytochemistry of ADSCs for NEP. ADSCs were stained with a mouse-anti NEP monoclonal antibody (green), and nuclei were counterstained with Hoechst 33342 (blue). Scale bar: 50 μm.

ADSC-derived NEP exhibits specific enzyme activity

To investigate the feasibility of using ADSC-derived NEP as a therapeutic target, we examined whether ADSCs indeed exhibited NEP-specific enzyme activity. We measured NEP-specific enzyme activity using a fluorogenic peptide substrate, Mca-RPPGFSAFK(Dnp), and a selective NEP inhibitor, thiorphan. This substrate can be cleaved by several endopeptidases, including NEP, endothelin-converting enzyme (ECE)-1, ECE-2, angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE)-1, ACE-2, and insulin-degrading enzyme (IDE)26. However, at pH 7.5, the use of thiorphan allows the discrimination of NEP enzyme activity from other closely related enzymes26.

Cell lysates of ADSCs from each donor exhibited enzyme activity both in the presence and absence of thiorphan (Figs. S2 A-D). NEP-specific activity, calculated after the subtraction of fluorescence in the presence of thiorphan, demonstrated that all ADSCs exhibited NEP-specific enzyme activity (Fig. 2A). NEP-specific enzyme activity accounted for 38.3 ± 4.5% of total enzyme activity (Fig. 2B), and the activity level of 1 μg ADSC cell lysate was estimated to be equivalent to that of 0.35 ± 0.14 ng recombinant human NEP (rhNEP) (Fig. 2C, termed as NEP activity index). In contrast to the above observation, BM-MSCs showed weak or undetectable NEP enzyme activity (Fig. 2D). Intriguingly, the total enzyme activity of BM-MSCs measured in the absence of thiorphan was comparable to that of ADSCs (Figs. S3 A, B). That is, NEP-specific enzyme activity contributed relatively little to the total enzyme activity of BM-MSCs (Fig. 2D), suggesting that NEP activity is a unique characteristic of ADSCs. These results support the idea that NEP expressed by ADSCs, but not BM-MSCs, may be therapeutically useful for AD.

Figure 2. ADSCs, but not BM-MSCs, exhibit NEP-specific enzyme activity.

Figure 2

Open in a new tab

(A) NEP-specific enzyme activity was measured in ADSC cell lysates (left: #1–3 and right: #4–6) using a fluorogenic peptide substrate, Mca-RPPGFSAFK(Dnp). The average NEP activity represented by fluorescence intensity was measured with a reading interval of 5 min. The specific NEP activity was calculated by subtracting residual fluorescent intensity after incubation with the NEP inhibitor thiorphan (Fig. S2 A–D). Data are the mean ± S.D. (n = 3). (B) NEP contribution ratio calculated as the percentage ratio of NEP-specific activity rate to total activity rate. NEP-specific or total enzyme activity rate was determined as the gradient of the corresponding time course of fluorescent intensity. Data are the mean ± S.D. (n = 3). (C) NEP-specific enzyme activity levels of ADSCs were estimated from rhNEP standard curves (Fig. S2 E–H) and represented as the value ng-rhNEP/μg-protein (termed as NEP activity index in the diagram). Data are the mean ± S.D. (n = 3). (D) Comparison of NEP-specific enzyme activity levels between ADSC #4 and BM-MSCs #1–4. Data are the mean ± S.D. (n = 3).

ADSCs secrete exosomes to their culture supernatant

Recently, it has been shown that exosomes secreted by MSCs contribute to their paracrine effects19,25,26. Considering the reports that transplanted MSCs influenced AD via their paracrine effects15,16,17,18, we hypothesized that ADSC-derived exosomes would have therapeutic potential for AD, especially by focusing on their NEP producing ability.

To test whether ADSCs could secrete NEP via exosome release, we isolated putative exosome fractions from conditioned media of ADSCs from 4 donors (#1–4) with a standard ultracentrifugation method27,28. The phase-contrast electron micrographs of the exosomes revealed rounded and double-membraned structures with a size of approximately 60–200 nm (Fig. 3A). Immunoblot analyses revealed that tetraspanin CD81, a reliable exosomal marker29, was present in the exosome fraction but absent in the donor cell lysates (Fig. 3B). We also confirmed the presence of CD63, another well-established exosome marker29 (Fig. 3B). CD63 was also detected in the cell lysate, but this is in accordance with the fact that CD63 is expressed by MSCs30. In contrast, cellular proteins cytochrome c and actin were detected exclusively in the cell lysates (Fig. 3B). Then, we analyzed the size distribution of the isolated exosomes by two distinct methods: NTA and scanning ion occlusion sensing (SIOS). The size distribution was physically homogeneous with a peak at 150–200 nm, as determined by nanoparticle tracking analysis (NTA) (Fig. 3C, E), or at 110–160 nm, as determined by SIOS (Fig. 3D, E). The size of ADSC-derived exosomes was relatively larger than that of previously reported exosomes, which were 50–100 nm in diameter. The exosome yield per 106 ADSCs per day was 1–4 × 108 particles, as determined by NTA, or 1–4 μg protein, as determined by the Bradford method (Fig. 3E). Collectively, these results reveal that ADSCs secrete exosomes to the culture supernatant.

Figure 3. ADSCs secrete 100–200 nm exosomes.

Figure 3

Open in a new tab

(A) A phase-contrast transmission electron micrograph of purified ADSC #4-derived exosomes. Scale bar: 100 nm. (B) The exosome fractions and cell lysates of ADSCs #1 and #4 were analyzed by immunoblotting with antibodies against exosomal proteins CD63 and CD81 and cellular proteins cytochrome-c (Cyt-c) and actin (CD63 under nonreducing conditions). Equal amounts of protein from cell lysates or exosomes were used for each assay: 0.5 μg for CD63, 5 μg for CD81 and Cyt-c, and 1 μg for actin. (C, D) Size distribution of ADSC#1-derived exosomes as measured by nanoparticle tracking analysis (NTA) showed a peak at 175 nm (C), and scanning ion occlusion sensing (SIOS) showed a peak at 118.9 nm (D). (E) Yields and peak diameters of exosomes produced by ADSCs #1–4 are summarized. Protein amounts and particle numbers of harvested exosomes were determined by the Bradford method and NTA, respectively. Peak diameters were determined by NTA and SIOS. Data are the mean ± S.D. (n = 3−4).

ADSC-derived exosomes contain enzymatically active NEP

It is thought that the molecular composition of exosomes reflects the specialized functions of their original cells19,31. Thus, we next asked whether ADSC-derived exosomes contained enzymatically active NEP. Immunoblot analyses revealed that exosomes secreted by each line of donor-derived ADSCs contained NEP (Fig. 4A). Of note, the enzyme activity assay using a fluorogenic substrate revealed that these exosomes exhibited NEP-specific activity (Fig. 4B). Interestingly, comparison of exosomal enzyme activity in the presence and absence of thiorphan demonstrated that NEP-specific activity accounted for a large proportion of the total activity (Fig. 4C, D): the enzyme activity was almost completely lost in the presence of thiorphan (Fig. 4D). The NEP-specific activity / total activity ratios of ADSC-derived exosomes reached 89.5 ± 4.4% (Fig. 4E). NEP-specific activity level of 1 μg protein from ADSC-derived exosomes was estimated to be equivalent to 0.26 ± 0.07 ng rhNEP (Fig. 4F, Fig. 4S). In addition, we confirmed that ADSC-derived exosomes exhibited a higher NEP-specific activity than BM-MSC-derived esosomes (Fig. 4G). These results demonstrate that ADSC-derived exosomes possess enzymatically active NEP, implying that they can serve as a novel NEP protein delivery system.

Figure 4. ADSC-derived exosomes possess enzymatically active NEP.

Figure 4

Open in a new tab

(A) Immunoblotting for NEP of exosomes isolated from ADSCs #1–4. (B–D) NEP enzyme activity assay for ADSC-derived exosomes (#1–4). NEP enzyme activity was measured using a fluorogenic peptide substrate, Mca-RPPGFSAFK(Dnp) and NEP inhibitor thiorphan. NEP specific activity (B) was calculated by subtracting the residual fluorescence intensity measured in the presence of thiorphan (D) from the total enzyme activity measured in the absence of thiorphan (C). Addition of thiorphan sharply reduced the enzyme activity of ADSC-derived exosomes (D). (E) NEP contribution ratio for ADSC-derived exosomes calculated as the percentage ratio of NEP-specific activity rate to total activity rate. (F) NEP-specific enzyme activity levels of exosome fractions of ADSCs #1–4 were estimated from a rhNEP standard curve (Fig. 4S) and are represented as the value ng-rhNEP/μg protein (termed as NEP activity index in the diagram). N.D. indicates “not determined”.

ADSCs decrease both the extracellular and intracellular Aβ levels of N2a cells

To test whether ADSCs could contribute to decrease of both synthesized and secreted Aβ, we co-cultured ADSCs or BM-MSCs with a neuroblastoma cell line N2a cells genetically modified to overproduce human Aβ (Fig. 5A)32. Both Aβ40 and 42 levels in the N2a cell culture media were significantly decreased after co-culture with ADSCs or BM-MSCs (Fig. 5B, C). The decreasing degrees of both secreted Aβ40 and 42 levels were greater in co-culture with ADSCs than BM-MSCs (Fig. 5B, C). Of note, we also found that the intracellular Aβ42 level in N2a cells was significantly decreased by co-culture with ADSCs or BM-MSCs (Fig. 5D). This suggests that NEP-loaded exosomes secreted by ADSCs or BM-MSCs entered the cytoplasm of N2a cells, and degraded the intracellular Aβ of N2a cells. Indeed, addition of thiorphan raised the intracellular Aβ42 level from 77% to 92% of that of the control (Fig. 5E). We also confirmed that ADSC-derived exosomes, at least in part, contributed to decreasing the intracellular Aβ42 level in N2a cells (Fig. S5).

Figure 5. ADSCs decrease both the extracellular and intracellular Aβ levels of N2a cells.

Figure 5

Open in a new tab

(A) Schematic representation of the co-culture experiments of N2a cells with ADSCs or BM-MSCs using cell culture inserts. Secreted Aβ40 (B) and Aβ42 (C) levels were measured using the collected CM in the bottom chambers by ELISA. Each value was normalized to the protein content of N2a cell lysates. Data are the mean ± S.D. (n = 4). (D) Intracellular Aβ42 levels were measured using the N2a cell lysates by ELISA. Each value was normalized to the protein content of N2a cell lysates. (E) Intracellular Aβ42 levels were compared in co-cultures of ADSCs and N2a cells in the presence and absence of thiorphan. Each value is shown as the relative level to the control. Data are the mean ± S.D. (n = 4).

ADSC-derived exosomes are incorporated into neuroblastoma cells

To verify that ADSC transferred their exosomes to N2a cells, we co-cultured PKH26 labeled ADSCs with PKH67 labled N2a cells (Fig. 6A). One day after co-culture, some, but not all, N2a cells were co-stained with PKH26 and PKH67, suggesting that exosomes secreted by ADSCs were transferred to N2a cells (Fig. 6A). Interestingly, however, we did not observe co-stained ADSCs, suggesting a certain mechanism underlying the unidirectional transport of exosomes from ADSCs to N2a cells, but not from N2a cells to ADSCs. Exosomal membrane is rich in ceramide, which may lead to inefficient incorporation of the cell membrane-linked PKH into the secreted exosomes33. Thus, we next directly labeled ADSC-derived exosomes with PKH67, and examined whether these exosomes were incorporated into N2a cells (Fig. 6B). Seven hr after exosome addition to N2a culture medium, some of the cells were already stained green. Furthermore, after 24 hr, most N2a cells were stained green, indicating that ADSC-derived exosomes were efficiently transferred into recipient N2a cells. Collectively, it was demonstrated that ADSCs transferred their exosomes to N2a cells, which may lead to the decrease in the intracellular Aβ42 level of N2a cells.

Figure 6. ADSC-derived exosomes are incorporated into N2a cells.

Figure 6

Open in a new tab

(A) Top diagram shows the schematic representation of the co-culture experiements of N2a cells and ADSCs labeled with PKH67 and PKH26, respectively.Bottom diagram shows the representative image taken 24 hr after co-culture of N2a cells with ADSCs. Filled arrowheads indicate N2a cells co-stained with PKH26 and PKH67. Open arrowheads indicate PKH26 labeled ADSCs. Scale bar: 50 μm. (B) Purified ADSC exosomes or vehicle PBS(-) as a control were labeled with PKH67, and incubated with cultured N2a cells. 7 hr after incubation, some of the cells were stained green (arrowheads). After 24 hr, most N2a cells were stained green. Scale bar: 25 μm.

Discussion

In this study, we demonstrated the unique potential of ADSCs for AD treatment. The main finding was that ADSCs secreted functional NEP in association with exosomes. Most importantly, these ADSC-derived exosomes exhibited NEP-specific enzyme activity. Furthermore, it was indicated that exosomes secreted by ADSCs were transferred to N2a cells, and contributed, at least in part, to decrease of both extracellular and intracellular Aβ levels. Another important observation was that ADSCs expressed NEP at a higher level than BM-MSCs. These results suggest that ADSCs may serve as a promising cell source for exosome-based AD treatments.

To our knowledge, this is the first report of the isolation of exosomes containing functional NEP from cultured cells, suggesting a promising new approach for AD treatment. Earlier studies have shown that NEP is present in microvesicles derived from certain body fluids, including prostatic fluid34, epididymal fluid35, and urine36. However, no study has focused on the therapeutic potential of microvesicle-bound NEP for AD. Indeed, it seems impractical to obtain a sufficient amount of microvesicles from the limited amount of available body fluid. In this context, MSCs have a great advantage because they can be isolated in large amounts from patients and they have the ability to expand many-fold in culture. Importantly, the co-culture experiments suggested that ADSC-derived exosomes contributed to decrease of the secreted Aβ level in N2a cells. Furthermore, it is intriguing that the intracellular Aβ42 level was also decreased by co-culture with ADSCs as well as by addition of ADSC-derived exosomes. Although we do not exclude other possible effects of ADSCs on the co-cultured N2a cells, the results indicate a novel possibility: that is, incorporated ADSC-derived exosomes contributed to the degradation of the intracellular Aβ42 in the recipient N2a cells. Many reports have suggested that accumulation of intraneuronal Aβ42 is an early event in the progression of AD, preceding the formation of extracellular Aβ deposits37. Thus, our results suggest the possibility that ADSC-derived exosomes contribute to prevention of extracellular plaque formation and subsequent AD pathogenesis.

Our results also demonstrated that ADSCs, but not BM-MSCs, expressed enzymatically active NEP. Since the discovery of MSCs in bone marrow, MSCs have been identified in many adult tissues8,9,10. Although ADSCs and BM-MSCs are considered to be similar, an increasing number of reports have indicated that these cells have phenotypic differences regarding differentiation capacity8, immunosuppressive potential38,39, homing and migratory behavior40, and trophic effects39,41. These observations highlight the importance of selecting the optimal mesenchymal tissue as a source of MSCs for specific purposes. In this context, our comparative analyses between ADSCs and BM-MSCs provide strong evidence that ADSCs are the more suitable source of NEP-bound exosomes.

Another interesting finding was that ADSC-derived exosomes were rich in NEP. The fluorogenic substrate used in the present study can be cleaved by NEP and closely related enzymes, including IDE, ECEs, and ACEs. All of these enzymes can degrade Aβ, although their contribution in Aβ clearance in the brain is small4,5. ECEs and ACEs are membrane-bound enzymes, suggesting their potential presence on secreted exosomes. However, the experiments with the NEP-specific inhibitor thirophan revealed that ~ 90% of the enzyme activity of ADSC-derived exosomes was accounted for by NEP; the counterpart of the donor ADSC lysates was ~ 40%. Furthermore, we also found that BM-MSC-derived exosomes also exhibited NEP-specific activity. Intriguingly, whereas NEP-specific activity of parental BM-MSCs slightly contributed to the total enzyme activity, that of their exosomes accounted for more than 70% of the total enzyme activity (Fig. S6). We do not have an explanation for these observations, but it is likely that NEP was enriched in exosomes during their biogenesis. Collectively, these results suggest that ADSC-derived exosomes offer a new therapeutic approach to AD.

Recent reports support a scenario in which NEP-loaded exosomes contribute to Aβ clearance in the brain. A major obstacle for systemically administered drugs is the blood-brain barrier (BBB). Membrane vesicles have been proposed to be transported across the interior of a cell via transcytosis42, which may enable these vesicles to cross the BBB. Indeed, recent reports have suggested that exosomes administered intravenously43 or intranasally44 crossed the BBB and resulted in successful delivery of the cargo directly into the brain. These studies strongly support the hypothesis that ADSC-derived exosomes can directly enter the brain and help clear extracellular Aβ. Another possibility is that ADSC-derived exosomes may help lower peripheral Aβ levels, which possibly promotes brain Aβ clearance. Peripheral degradation of Aβ through virus-mediated NEP gene delivery has been demonstrated to decrease brain soluble Aβ peptide levels45,46. In this context, NEP delivery using ADSC-derived exosomes has an advantage in patient safety because it does not require the use of viral vectors. Taken together, ADSC-derived exosomes may offer a promising approach to NEP delivery peripherally and/or directly into the brain.

In conclusion, this study proposes a new therapeutic approach to AD using ADSC-derived exosomes. Further work will be required to assess the utility of NEP-loaded exosomes for AD therapy.

Methods

Cell culture

ADSCs #1–3 were purchased from Invitrogen. ADSCs #4–6 were isolated in our laboratory by processing adipose tissue as previously described11. BM-MSCs #1–3 and #4 were purchased from the RIKEN cell bank and Cambrex, respectively. The donor information for ADSCs and BM-MSCs is listed in Supplementary Tables 1 and 2, respectively. BM-MSCs and ADSCs were routinely cultured in reduced serum (2%) medium (MesenPRO RS, Invitrogen) containing 1 × Glutamax (Invitrogen) and 1 × antibiotic antimycotic (Invitrogen). All ADSCs and BM-MSCs were used within the eighth passage. Stable mouse neuroblastoma N2a cells expressing both human APP695 with the Swedish mutation and presenilin 2 with the N141I mutation were kindly provided by Dr. Saido Takaomi (RIKEN Brain Institute, Japan). N2a cells were cultured in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (Invitrogen) supplemented with 10% FBS (Invitrogen) and 1 × antibiotic antimycotic.

Flow cytometry

Aliquots of detached cells were washed in PBS containing 2% BSA and stained with anti-CD10 PE-conjugated (Biolegend). Samples were acquired using Cytomics FC500 flow cytometer (Beckman Coulter) and analyzed by CXP and WinMDI software.

Quantitative reverse transcription PCR (qRT-PCR)

Total RNA was isolated from ADSCs and BM-MSCs with the RNeasy Mini Kit (QIAGEN). Reverse-transcription was performed using SuperScript III Reverse Transcriptase (Invitrogen, Tokyo, Japan) and random primers (Invitrogen) according to the manufacturer's guidelines. cDNAs were used for PCR utilizing Platinum SYBR Green qPCR SuperMix UDG (Invitrogen). NEP expression levels were normalized to an endogenous control, β-actin. The sequences of the NEP and β-actin primers (Invitrogen) were as follows: for NEP, 5′-CCTTCTTTAGTGCCCAGCAG-3′ (forward) and 5′- TGAGTCCACCAGTCAACGAG-3′ (reverse); for β-actin, 5′- ACTCTTCCAGCCTTCCTTCC-3′ (forward) and 5′- AGCACTGTGTTGGCGTACAG-3′ (reverse).

Protein extraction

ADSCs and BM-MSCs were dissolved in Mammalian Protein Extraction Reagent (M-PER) (Pierce, Rockford, IL). Prepared cell lysates were used for immunoblotting and NEP enzyme activity assays. The protein concentrations were measured by the Bradford method using a protein assay kit (Bio-Rad).

Immunoblot analysis

Cell lysates and exosomes were separated on SDS-polyacrylamide gels and transferred to polyvinylidine difluoride membranes (BIORAD, Tokyo, Japan). Blots were blocked in blocking solution (Nacalai Tesque) at 4°C overnight and incubated at room temperature for 1 hour with mouse monoclonal anti-NEP (Abcam) (1:1000), mouse anti-actin (1:2000), mouse-anti CD63 (BD) (1:200), mouse-anti CD81 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology) (1:200), or mouse-anti cytochrome-c (BD) (1:200) antibody (CD63 was assessed under nonreducing conditions). Following washing in TBS-T, the membranes were incubated for 1 hour with sheep anti-mouse IgG-HRP-linked whole antibodies. Bound antibodies were visualized by chemiluminescence using an ECL Plus Western blotting detection system (RPN2132) (GE HealthCare) or an ImmunoStar kit (Wako), and images were analyzed by a LuminoImager (LAS-3000; Fuji Film, Inc.).

Immunocytochemistry

The cells were cultured in glass base dishes (IWAKI), and subsequently fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde (Sigma-Aldrich) in PBS. Heat-induced antigen retrieval was performed using ImmunoSavor (Nisshin EM Co. Ltd.). After incubation in blocking solution (Nacalai Tesque), the cells were incubated with mouse monoclonal anti-NEP (Abcam) at 1:100 overnight at 4°C. Then, the cells were incubated with Alexa Fluor 488-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG antibody (Invitrogen) at 1:500 for 60 min. Nuclei were counterstained with Hoechst 33342 (Dojindo).

Preparation of conditioned medium (CM) and exosomes

Prior to culture medium collection, ADSCs were washed twice with PBS, and the medium was switched to fresh serum-free medium (StemPRO SFM, Invitrogen). After incubation for 2–3 days, the medium was collected and centrifuged at 2,000 × g for 15 min at room temperature. The cells were supplemented with fresh SFM, cultured for 2–3 more days, and the medium was collected and centrifuged as described above. The harvested media were combined into 1 batch. To thoroughly remove cellular debris, the supernatant was filtered with a 0.22-μm filter unit (Millipore). Then, the CM was ultracentrifuged at 110,000 × g for 70 min at 4°C. The pellets were washed with 11 ml PBS, and after ultracentrifugation, they were resuspended in PBS. The exosome fraction protein content was assessed by the Bradford method.

NEP enzyme activity assay

Neprilysin activity was determined by fluorescence resonance energy transfer. The fluorogenic peptide substrate Mca-RPPGFSAFK(Dnp)-OH (R&D Systems, Inc.) was added at a final concentration of 20 μM to 5 μg cell lysates, and 5 or 10 μg ADSC-derived exosomes, respectively. The enzymatic reaction was carried out at 37°C in the presence or absence of the NEP inhibitor thiorphan (2.5 μg/mL) (Enzo Life Science). Fluorescent intensity was read at excitation and emission wavelengths of 320 nm and 405 nm, respectively, in kinetic mode for 5 minutes using a Safire Multi-Detection Monochrometer Microplate Reader (Tecan). The NEP-specific activity was determined as the fluorescence difference occurring in the presence or absence of thiorphan. NEP-specific or total enzyme activity rate was determined as the gradient of the corresponding time course of the fluorescent intensity. Then, the NEP contribution ratio was calculated as the percentage ratio of the NEP-specific activity rate and the total activity rate. We also quantified absolute NEP-specific activity using serial dilutions of recombinant human NEP (rhNEP) (R&D Systems, Inc.) as a standard. The gradient of the time course of the fluorescent intensity in its linear region was determined at each concentration of the rhNEP dilution series to produce a standard curve. NEP activity per sample protein amount was determined as the rhNEP-equivalent amount, which we termed as the “NEP activity index” with the unit ng-rhNEP/μg-sample protein.

Phase-contrast transmission electron microscopy

ADSC-derived exosomes were visualized by Terabase Inc. using the phase-contrast transmission electron microscopy, which can envision the high-contrast images of nano structures of soft-materials including biological samples such as liposomes, viruses, bacteria, and cells, without staining process which may cause damages on the subjects. The natural structure of the sample distributed in the solution can be observed by preparing the sample with rapid vitreous ice embedding method and using cryo phase-contrast transmission electron microscopy.

Measurement of size distribution and particle number by nanoparticle tracking analysis (NTA)

NTA was carried out using the Nanosight system (NanoSight) on exosomes resuspended in PBS at a concentration of approximately 500 μg protein/mL and were further diluted 100-fold for analysis. The system focuses a laser beam through a suspension of the particles of interest. These are visualized by light scattering using a conventional optical microscope aligned perpendicularly to the beam axis, which collects light scattered from every particle in the field of view. A 60 s video records all events for further analysis by NTA software. The Brownian motion of each particle is tracked between frames, ultimately allowing calculation of the size through application of the Stokes-Einstein equation.

Size distribution analysis by scanning ion occlusion sensing (SIOS)

SIOS analysis was carried out using the qNano system (Izon Science, Ltd.) on exosomes resuspended in PBS. SIOS allows single particle measurements as colloids and/or biomolecular analytes are driven through pores one at a time. Particles crossing the nanopore are detected as a transient change in the ionic current flow, which is denoted as a blockade event with its amplitude as the blockade magnitude. As blockade magnitude is proportional to particle size, accurate particle sizing can be achieved after calibration with a known standard.

Co-culture of N2a cells with ADSCs

For assessing whether MSCs can affect production and secretion of Aβ by N2a cells, we performed co-culture experiment using cell culture inserts possessing 0.4 μm pores (BD Falcon). N2a cells were seeded to the bottom chambers of 24 well-plates (BD Falcon) at 2 × 104 cells/well. On the next day, ADSCs #2 were seeded to the top chambers at 6 × 103 cells/insert which gave an almost confluent monolayer. After 2 days, culture media in the both top and bottom chambers were changed with fresh media, and the cells were cultured for further 8 hr. Then, the media in the bottom chambers were collected, centrifuged at 2,000 × g for 10 min, and the supernatants were used for the subsequent analysis. N2a cell lysates were also collected using M-PER, and cellular protein amounts were determined by Bradford method. Secreted and intracellular Aβ40 and 42 levels were measured using the CM and the N2a cell lysates, respectively, with ELISA kits (Wako). Both secreted and intracellular Aβ levels were normalized by the protein content of N2a cells. To investigate whether the decrease of Aβ levels was ascribed to NEP activity, thiorphan was added to the culture inserts at the concentration of 20 μM.

Exosome transfer analysis by co-culture experiments

N2a cells were labeled with a PKH67 green fluorescent labeling kit (Sigma-Aldrich) following the manufacture's instruction, and seeded to 35 mm glass base dishes (IWAKI) at 5 × 104 cells/dish. On the next day, ADSCs #2 were labeled with a PKH26 red fluorescent labeling kit (Sigma-Aldrich) and added to the dishes at 5 × 104 cells/dish (Fig. 5A). After 24 hr, cells were observed under confocal microscopy.

PKH67-labeled exosome transfer

Purified exosomes derived from ADSCs #2 CM were labeled with PKH67. Exosomes were incubated with 2 M PKH67 for 5 min, washed 4 times using a 100-kDa filter (Microcon YM-100, Millipore) to remove excess dye, and incubated with N2a cells cultured in 35 mm glass base dishes (Fig. 6A). Exosome-free PBS(-) that received the same treatment as above was used as a control. The cells were observed at 1, 7, and 24 hr under confocal microscopy.

Author Contributions

T.O. supervised the project; T.K., R.T., K.O., F.T., Y.S., M.K. and T.O. designed research; T.K., R.T., Y.Y. and K.T. performed experiments; T.K. and R.T. analyzed data; and T.K., N.K. and T.O. wrote the paper.

Supplementary Material

Supplementary Information

Supplementary information

srep01197-s1.pdf (481.7KB, pdf)

Acknowledgments

We thank Drs. Takaomi Saido and Takashi Saito (RIKEN) for providing the N2a cells, Dr. Yukio Kato (Hiroshima University) for providing the human BM-MSCs #1 - #3, Dr. Yoko Kayama and Ms. Noriko Kai (Terabase Inc.) for providing electron microscopy images, Ms. Ayako Irie (Quantum Design Japan, Inc.) for assisting with NTA using the Nanosight system Mr. Ryushi Fukuda (Meiwafosis Co. Ltd) for assisting with the SIOS analysis using the q Nano system, and Ms. Ayako Inoue (National Cancer Center) for her excellent technical assistance. This study was supported in part by a Grant-in-Aid for the Third-Term Comprehensive 10-Year Strategy for Cancer Control of Japan, a grant-in-aid for Scientific Research on Priority Areas Cancer from the Japanese Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology, a Grant-in-Aid for cancer research promotion from National Cancer Center of Japan, the Program for Promotion of Fundamental Studies in Health Sciences of the National Institute of Biomedical Innovation (NiBio) of Japan, and Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research on Innovative Areas (‘‘functional machinery for non-coding RNAs’’) from the Japanese Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology.

References

  1. Hardy J. Amyloid, the presenilins and Alzheimer's disease. Trends Neurosci. 20, 154–159 (1997). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Selkoe D. J. The cell biology of beta-amyloid precursor protein and presenilin in Alzheimer's disease. Trends Cell Biol. 8, 447–453 (1998). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Iwata N., Higuchi M. & Saido T. C. Metabolism of amyloid-beta peptide and Alzheimer's disease. Pharmacol. Ther. 108, 129–148 (2005). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Iwata N. et al. Metabolic regulation of brain Abeta by neprilysin. Science 292, 1550–1552 (2001). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Iwata N. et al. Identification of the major Abeta1-42-degrading catabolic pathway in brain parenchyma: suppression leads to biochemical and pathological deposition. Nat. Med. 6, 143–150 (2000). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Yasojima K., Akiyama H., McGeer E. G. & McGeer P. L. Reduced neprilysin in high plaque areas of Alzheimer brain: a possible relationship to deficient degradation of beta-amyloid peptide. Neurosci. Lett. 297, 97–100 (2001). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Miners J. S., Barua N., Kehoe P. G., Gill S. & Love S. Aβ-degrading enzymes: potential for treatment of Alzheimer disease. J. Neuropathol. Exp. Neurol. 70, 944–959 (2011). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Sakaguchi Y., Sekiya I., Yagishita K. & Muneta T. Comparison of human stem cells derived from various mesenchymal tissues: superiority of synovium as a cell source. Arthritis Rheum. 52, 2521–2529 (2005). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Banas A. et al. Adipose tissue-derived mesenchymal stem cells as a source of human hepatocytes. Hepatology 46, 219–228 (2007). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Chamberlain G., Fox J., Ashton B. & Middleton J. Concise review: mesenchymal stem cells: their phenotype, differentiation capacity, immunological features, and potential for homing. Stem Cells 25, 2739–2749 (2007). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Banas A., Yamamoto Y., Teratani T. & Ochiya T. Stem cell plasticity: learning from hepatogenic differentiation strategies. Dev. Dyn. 236, 3228–3241 (2007). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Sadan O., Melamed E. & Offen D. Bone-marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cell therapy for neurodegenerative diseases. Expert. Opin. Biol. Ther. 9, 1487–1497 (2009). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Jin H. K., Bae J. S., Furuya S. & Carter J. E. Amyloid beta-derived neuroplasticity in bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells is mediated by NPY and 5-HT2B receptors via ERK1/2 signalling pathways. Cell Prolif. 42, 571–586 (2009). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Habisch H. J. et al. Efficient processing of Alzheimer's disease amyloid-Beta peptides by neuroectodermally converted mesenchymal stem cells. Stem Cells Dev. 19, 629–633 (2010). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Lee J. K. et al. Intracerebral transplantation of bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells reduces amyloid-beta deposition and rescues memory deficits in Alzheimer's disease mice by modulation of immune responses. Stem Cells. 28, 329–43 (2010). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Kil J., Jin H. K. & Bae J. S. Bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells reduce brain amyloid-beta deposition and accelerate the activation of microglia in an acutely induced Alzheimer's disease mouse model. Neurosci. Lett. 450, 136–141 (2009). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Lee H. J. et al. The therapeutic potential of human umbilical cord blood-derived mesenchymal stem cells in Alzheimer's disease. Neurosci. Lett. 481, 30–35 (2010). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Zilka N. et al. Mesenchymal stem cells rescue the Alzheimer's disease cell model from cell death induced by misfolded truncated tau. Neuroscience 193, 330–337 (2011). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Katsuda T., Kosaka N., Takeshita F. & Ochiya T. The therapeutic potential of mesenchymal stem cell-derived extracellular vesicles. Proteomics (in press). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Théry C., Ostrowski M. & Segura E. Membrane vesicles as conveyors of immune responses. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 9, 581–593 (2009). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Valadi H. et al. Exosome-mediated transfer of mRNAs and microRNAs is a novel mechanism of genetic exchange between cells. Nat. Cell Biol. 9, 654–659 (2007). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Taylor D. D. & Gercel-Taylor C. Exosomes/microvesicles: mediators of cancer-associated immunosuppressive microenvironments. Semin. Immunopathol. 33, 441–454 (2011). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Kosaka N. et al. Secretory mechanisms and intercellular transfer of microRNAs in living cells. J. Biol. Chem. 285, 17442–17452 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Bruno S. et al. Mesenchymal stem cell-derived microvesicles protect against acute tubular injury. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 20, 1053–1067 (2009). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Lai R. C. et al. Exosome secreted by MSC reduces myocardial ischemia/reperfusion injury. Stem Cell Res. 4, 214–222 (2010). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Miners J. S., Verbeek M. M., Rikkert M. O., Kehoe P. G. & Love S. Immunocapture-based fluorometric assay for the measurement of neprilysin-specific enzyme activity in brain tissue homogenates and cerebrospinal fluid. J. Neurosci. Methods 167, 229–236 (2008). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Théry C., Amigorena S., Raposo G. & Clayton A. Isolation and characterization of exosomes from cell culture supernatants and biological fluids. Curr. Protoc. Cell Biol. Chapter 3:Unit 3.22 (2006). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Taylor D. D., Zacharias W. & Gercel-Taylor C. Exosome isolation for proteomic analyses and RNA profiling. Methods Mol. Biol. 728, 235–246 (2011). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Denzer K., Kleijmeer M. J., Heijnen H. F., Stoorvogel W. & Geuze H. J. Exosome: from internal vesicle of the multivesicular body to intercellular signaling device. J. Cell Sci. 113, 3365–3374 (2000). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Stewart K. et al. STRO-1, HOP-26 (CD63), CD49a and SB-10 (CD166) as markers of primitive human marrow stromal cells and their more differentiated progeny: a comparative investigation in vitro. Cell Tissue. Res. 313, 281–290 (2005). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. van Niel G., Porto-Carreiro I., Simoes S. & Raposo G. Exosomes: a common pathway for a specialized function. J. Biochem. 140, 13–21 (2006). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Shirotani K. et al. Neprilysin degrades both amyloid beta peptides 1–40 and 1–42 most rapidly and efficiently among thiorphan- and phosphoramidon-sensitive endopeptidases. J. Biol. Chem. 276, 21895–21901 (2001). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Trajkovic K. et al. Ceramide triggers budding of exosome vesicles into multivesicular endosomes. Science 319, 1244–1247 (2008). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Carlsson L. et al. Characteristics of human prostasomes isolated from three different sources. Prostate 54, 322–330 (2003). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Gatti J. L., Métayer S., Belghazi M., Dacheux F. & Dacheux J. L. Identification, proteomic profiling, and origin of ram epididymal fluid exosome-like vesicles. Biol. Reprod. 72, 1452–1465 (2005). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Conde-Vancells J. et al. Candidate biomarkers in exosome-like vesicles purified from rat and mouse urine samples. Proteomics 4, 416–425 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. LaFerla F. M., Green K. N. & Oddo S. Intracellular amyloid-beta in Alzheimer's disease. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 8, 499–509 (2007). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Keyser K. A., Beagles K. E. & Kiem H. P. Comparison of mesenchymal stem cells from different tissues to suppress T-cell activation. Cell Transplant 16, 555–562 (2007). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Banas A. et al. IFATS collection: in vivo therapeutic potential of human adipose tissue mesenchymal stem cells after transplantation into mice with liver injury. Stem Cells 26, 2705–2712 (2008). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Ahmadian N. et al. Comparative analysis of chemokine receptor's expression in mesenchymal stem cells derived from human bone marrow and adipose tissue. J. Mol. Neurosci. 44, 178–185 (2011). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Ikegame Y. et al. Comparison of mesenchymal stem cells from adipose tissue and bone marrow for ischemic stroke therapy. Cytotherapy 13, 675–685 (2011). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Cocucci E., Racchetti G. & Meldolesi J. Shedding microvesicles: artefacts no more. Trends Cell Biol. 19, 43–51 (2009). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Alvarez-Erviti L. et al. Delivery of siRNA to the mouse brain by systemic injection of targeted exosomes. Nat. Biotechnol. 29, 341–345 (2011). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Zhuang X. et al. Zhang HG.Treatment of brain inflammatory diseases by delivering exosome encapsulated anti-inflammatory drugs from the nasal region to the brain. Mol. Ther. 19, 1769–1779 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Hemming M. L. et al. Reducing amyloid plaque burden via ex vivo gene delivery of an Abeta-degrading protease: a novel therapeutic approach to Alzheimer disease. PLoS Med. 4, e262 (2007). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Liu Y. et al. Expression of neprilysin in skeletal muscle reduces amyloid burden in a transgenic mouse model of Alzheimer disease. Mol. Ther. 17, 1381–1386 (2009). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Information

Supplementary information

srep01197-s1.pdf (481.7KB, pdf)

Articles from Scientific Reports are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES